Impact of Rapid Lymphocyte and Monocyte Recovery on Overall Survival Post-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) with Fludarabine/Melphalan Conditioning

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3040-3040
Author(s):  
Lori DeCook ◽  
Mary Thoma ◽  
Tanya Huneke ◽  
Nicole Johnson ◽  
Robert Wiegand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Absolute Lymphocyte Counts ◽  
Complete Blood Counts

Abstract Abstract 3040 We have previously shown that both lymphocyte and monocyte recovery are strongly associated with improved survival post-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for acute leukemia (Thoma et al, Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, in press). We hypothesized that rapid lymphocyte and monocyte recovery would have a similarly positive impact on overall survival in reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) HSCT with fludarabine/melphalan. To test our hypothesis, we analyzed 118 consecutive patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT with fludarabine/melphalan conditioning for AML (n=49) and MDS/MPN (n=38), ALL (n=7) and other lymphoid malignancies (n=24) at our institution from 2001–2010. The absolute lymphocyte counts and monocyte counts (ALC and AMC, respectively) derived from routine complete blood counts were determined longitudinally at days +15, +30, +60, +100 and correlated with clinical outcomes. At the day +30 time point, both ALC and AMC > 0.3 × 10(9) cells/L were strongly associated with improved survival (OS 29.6 months vs. 5.4 months, p=0.006 and 25.3 months vs. 5.1 months, p=0.01 respectively), a pattern that continued through the day +100 evaluation. Multivariate analysis including age, CD34+ cell dose, unrelated vs. related HSCT, presence of aGVHD, remission status, and longitudinal hematologic parameters revealed that day +100 ALC (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07–0.66, p= 0.0096) and day +100 AMC (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.2–0.9, p=0.047) were the only independent predictors of survival in the model. Pairwise correlations showed moderate negative associations between aGVHD and day +60 and day +100 ALC and AMC. To further explore whether any inherent patterns in the timing of lymphocyte and monocyte recovery had prognostic value post-HSCT, we performed unsupervised hierarchical clustering on the longitudinal hematopoietic parameters studied in this cohort and identified four clusters of patients, clusters A-D. Patient clusters A and C both demonstrated improved ALC and AMC recovery at the day +60 and day +100 time points and had significantly improved OS compared with clusters B and D (not reached for A and C vs. 54.9 and 22.3 months, respectively, p<0.001). No patient in cluster D had a day +100 AMC > 0.3 × 10(9) cells/L, and these patients experienced more acute GVHD (p=0.006) and relapse (8 of 14 patients, p=0.002) compared with clusters A, B, and C (p=0.002). 29 patients who were unable to be clustered with this algorithm, predominantly due to early toxic deaths, had a median survival of 6 months. Consistent with previous observations in our myeloablative cohort, both lymphocyte and monocyte recovery are predictive of overall survival post-RIC HSCT. However, compared to the myeloablative cohort, monocyte recovery in this series appears slightly less strongly associated with survival. Our results also extend the observation of improved survival of ALC and AMC recovery post-HSCT to diseases beyond acute leukemia. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals 1153. Characterization of Invasive Mold Infections in Acute Leukemia and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipient Patients and Risk Factors for Mortality - a Single Center Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S603-S604
Author(s):  
Ryan Kubat ◽  
Praveen Subramanian ◽  
Yanming Li ◽  
Kassem Hammoud ◽  
Albert Eid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Invasive Mold Infections

Abstract Background Invasive mold infections (IMIs) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute leukemia (AL) and those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We describe the epidemiology of IMIs, the incidence of IMI in patients with acute myelogenous Leukemia (AML) post HSCT, and risk factors for mortality. Methods Patients were identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes using a University of Kansas internal database from 2009-2019, microbiology records, and an AML HSCT database and were followed through May 1st, 2020. Patients’ electronic medical records were reviewed for inclusion. IMI was defined as proven or probable using the 2009 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (MSG) guidelines. Incidence was calculated as IMI cases/100-person-years. Risk factors for overall mortality were evaluated using a Cox regression model. Results We included 138 patients: 79 developed IMI after HSCT (8 autologous, 71 allogeneic) and 59 developed IMI after AL diagnosis. Seventeen of the AL patients underwent HSCT after IMI diagnosis (12 within 100 days of IMI). Proven IMI occurred in 45 (32.6%) and probable IMI occurred in 93 (67.4%) patients. The most common prophylactic agent prior to IMI diagnosis was fluconazole (31.2%), with 21.0% receiving none. Aspergillus was the most commonly identified mold with 91 (65.9%) cases. The average treatment duration was 101 (range 0 - 799) days. The incidence of IMI in patients with AML who underwent HSCT was 2.35 cases/100 person-years. All-cause mortality among patients with AL or HSCT who developed IMI was 23.1% at 6 weeks, 34.1% at 12 weeks, and 61.2% at 1 year. On univariate Cox model, Karnofsky performance status &gt; 70 was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.317, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.110, 0.914]) among HSCT recipients. ICU admission within 7 days prior to IMI diagnosis (HR 6.469, 95% CI [1.779, 23.530]) and each one point increase in BMI (HR 1.051, CI [1.001, 1.103]) were associated with increased mortality in the AL group. Figure 1 - Invasive mold infections by pathogen in HSCT-recipients and acute leukemia patients from 2009-2019. Figure 2 - Antifungal prophylactic agents prescribed for at least one week at time of IMI diagnosis Table 1 - Univariate survival analysis calculated using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model among patients who developed IMI after HSCT and patients who developed IMI after acute leukemia diagnosis Conclusion IMIs are associated with significant mortality in HSCT recipients and AL patients; patients at higher risk for mortality include those with lower baseline Karnofsky scores, recent ICU admissions, and higher BMI at time of IMI diagnosis. Disclosures Wissam El Atrouni, MD, ViiV (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) Scores Correlates with Increased Readmissions and Days In Hospital In Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4748-4748
Author(s):  
Szwed A. Ellen ◽  
Jack W. Hsu ◽  
Wei Hou ◽  
Randy A. Brown ◽  
Christopher R. Cogle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Conditioning Regimens ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4748 Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) Scores Correlates with Increased Readmissions and Days in Hospital in Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Ellen Szwed, Jack W. Hsu, Wei Hou, Randy A. Brown, Christopher R. Cogle, John W. Hiemenz, W Stratford May, Jan S. Moreb, Baldeep Wirk, John R. Wingard. The hematopoietic stem cell transplant comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was developed to assess the impact of comorbidities in allogeneic stem cell transplant (AlloSCT) recipients. It has been shown to correlate with non-relapse mortality and overall survival in both the myeloablative, non-myeloablative (NMA), and reduced intensity (RIC) settings, regardless of graft source. However, the economic impact of allogeneic transplant in patients with comorbidities has not been assessed. We retrospectively analyzed 181 consecutive patients who underwent AlloSCT from an HLA identical sibling following either myleoablative (n= 109) or NMA/RIC (n=71) conditioning regimens between January 2001 and December 2008. The HCT-CI score was calculated according to the method of Sorror, et al. (Sorror ML, et al. Blood. 2005 106: 2912–2919). Median follow-up of the entire cohort was 2 years. As previously published, there was a statistically significant correlation between HCT-CI and both non-relapse mortality (HR = 1.147, p = 0.0170,) and overall survival (HR = 1.152, p=0.0001) at 2-years of 23% and 50% respectively. We found statistically significant correlations between the HCT-CI score and total number of hospital readmissions (mean = 1.92; r=0.192; p = 0.0098) and total days in hospital after initial discharge from hospital after stem cell infusion (mean = 22.4 days; r=0.156; p = 0.036). Interestingly, the correlation for number of hospital days did not become statistically significant until 180 days or greater after transplantation. There was no correlation between HCT-CI with graft source, relapse or graft-vs.-host disease. When we stratified the HCT-CI to either myeloablative (N=109) or NMA/RIC (N=71) conditioning regimens, the correlations between the HCT-CI and both non-relapse mortality and overall survival were still statistically significant. The differences in days of hospitalization remained statistically significant in the myeloablative setting, but not in the NMA/RIC setting. In conclusion, our analysis of AlloSCT recipients found a correlation between the HCT-CI and the number of readmissions and hospital length of stay for myeloablative but not NMA/RIC conditioning regimens, suggesting a higher HCT-CI score results in greater use of hospital resources and costs. The increase in resource utilization is greater after the immediate post-transplant period. Whether these conclusions also apply in other transplant settings will need to be investigated. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Prognostic Factors and Outcomes in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Vs. Non-Transplant Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Patients: A Comparative Analysis with the Leukemia/BMT Program of British Columbia (BC) and the BC Provincial CLL Database

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2549-2549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian J. Swic ◽  
Alexander G. T. MacPhail ◽  
Chinmay B. Dalal ◽  
Steven J.T. Huang ◽  
Alina S. Gerrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Abstract Background: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) patients (pts) have significant (sig) heterogeneity; survival ranges from decades to <5 years (yrs). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is promising treatment (tx) for high-risk pts. Ideally, predictive (pred) tools would allow clinicians to recognize such pts early, permitting transplant performance to maximize benefit and minimize procedure associated risk. Factors with significant (sig) pred capacity are not, however, entirely clarified. Moreover, limited studies compare CLL pts who have/have not received HSCT in terms of differences (diff) in characteristics (char) at diagnosis (dx), population (pop) composition and outcomes. This study evaluates pred factors for outcomes post allo-HSCT, and compares dx char between (bn) tx CLL pts who did /did not receive HSCT by evaluating a large pop-based CLL cohort (n= 1044) from the BC Provincial CLL Database (BCPCD). Methods: 102 CLL pts (71M, 31F) had consecutive allo-HSCT (01-91 to 03-13, L/BMT Program of BC). Median (med) age (range) at dx:HSCT was 50 (26-65):57 (32-68) yrs; med interval dx to HSCT 5.8 yrs (0.5 to 29). Most pts (78, 76%) received non-ablative therapy; (n=61 [60%] reduced-intensity fludarabine /busulfan [flu/bu] based [RIC], n=17 [17%] non-myeloablative flu-cyclophosphamide based [NMA]); 24 pts had myeloablative (MA) conditioning (CON). Donor status was 50% unrelated (UD) (51UD:51RD); 73M, 28 F. Results: With median (med) follow up (FU) (range) post allo-HSCT of 2 yrs (0.5-18); post dx of 9 yrs (1-38), 67 (50%) pts survive. 70 (69%) achieved CR post-HSCT a med of 187 (28-1274) days (d). 27 had CLL PROG a med of 339 (25-4367) d; 18 of 27 (67%) survive a med of 3 (0.5-18) yrs post HSCT. Factors pred OS post HSCT (KM p=; UVA HR=) (p<0.05) were: pre-HSCT FISH deletion 17p (del 17p) (0.005; 2.9), Dohner rank (0.02), HSCT specific comorbidity index (CoI) >3 vs. 0-2 (0.04; 2.5), HLA mismatched (MM) donor (0.03;2.3), pre-HSCT tx with alemtuzumab (alem) (0.005;3.0), CON (MA vs NMA or RIC) (0.046; 3.0), acute (A) graft vs host disease (GVHD) grade (g) 3-4 vs 0-2. (<0.001; 4.5), dn chim <90% (0.001; 5.2), abn FISH not clear post-HSCT (0.009; 2.6), yr of HSCT (pre- vs post-2010) (0.03; 3.13) and lack of CR post HSCT (<0.001; 10.5).The following sig pred for (OR; p=): >90% dn chim: no B symptoms at dx (2.5; 0.004), CON (RIC vs. NMA, (2.6; 0.006); clear FISH abn post-HSCT: CR post-HSCT (4.6; 0.004); CR post-HSCT: B symptoms at dx (0.4; 0.02), <=1 FISH abn (1.7; 0.045), rituximab (R) pre-HSCT (2.5; 0.001), clear FISH abn (2.5; 0.01), flu sensitivity (S) pre-HSCT (1.8; 0.03), S to last tx pre-HSCT (1.7; 0.03), CON (MA vs. RIC or NMA) (3.2; <0.001); PROG: Richter’s transformation ( Rich trans) pre-HSCT (3.5; 0.008), graft failure (3.3; 0.008), CoI >3 vs. 0-2 (6.9; 0.006), no R pre-HSCT (6.7; 0.01), CON (MA vs. NMA or RIC), (0.2; 0.03); NRM: pre-HSCT alem (2.7; 0.03), CoI >3 vs. 0-2 (2.7; 0.049), HLA MM (2.8; 0.01), CON (MA vs. rest) (3.0; 0.007), AGVHD g 3-4 vs. 0-2 (5.9; <0.001), FISH abn not clear (2.6; 0.04), and no CR (6.5; <0.001). Comparison bn allo-HSCT and BCPCD CLL pts showed sig diff at dx for Dohner FISH rank: more del 17p (23% vs.11%) and 11q (23% vs. 9%) in allo-HSCT pts (n=84 with pre-HSCT FISH); less +12 (13% vs. 17%), del 13q (24% vs.41%) or normal (22% vs 18%), p<0.001 than non-HSCT pts (n=952); Age at dx (med, range) was lower in HSCT (50, 26-65) vs non (62, 25-96), p<0.001; lymphocyte (lymph) count higher (14, 1-300 vs.11, 1-662, p=0.03), tx-free survival (TFS) from dx to 1st tx shorter at 0.75 (0-9.3) vs. 2.86 (0-20.6) yrs. Rich trans was more frequent in HSCT pts (8%) vs. non (3%), p=0.015.OS was sig better for HSCT pts (n=103) (med 17.6, SE 4.5, CI 95% 8.8-26) compared to non (n=494) (med 14.4, SE 1.1, CI 95% 12.1-16.6) (p=0.03). Conclusion: CLL allo-HSCT pts have sig diff than non including higher lymph at dx, shorter time to 1st tx, and higher risk FISH abn. 17p del remains high-risk with allo-HSCT. Pre-HSCT R increased post HSCT CR. Strategies to optimize post-HSCT CR and dn chim are important; these milestones are crucial to best outcome. PROG post-HSCT does not confer worse OS; rescue strategies are successful and deserve further study. Comparison of this large allo HSCT and pop-based BPCDB cohort indicate improved OS for allo-HSCT tx CLL pts vs. other, with a survival plateau. This data indicates early recognition of high-risk CLL patients for HSCT is likely to yield best long-term outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document