Phase 2 Trial of Intracycle Sequential Ofatumumab and Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3933-3933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano J Costa ◽  
Suzanne Fanning ◽  
Joseph Stephenson ◽  
Lawrence Afrin ◽  
Tricia Bentz ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3933 Background Ofatumumab is a novel fully humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with antigenic target distinct from rituximab and enhanced antibody dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) with single agent activity in relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including heavily pretreated patients. The immunomodulatory agent (IMID) lenalidomide has been shown to induce T cell and NK cell activation and in vitro enhances rituximab induced killing of B-CLL cells via NK cell-mediated and monocyte-mediated ADCC. We hypothesized that the sequential treatment of patients with ofatumumab and lenalidomide would provide optimal pharmacodynamic interaction and be active in R/R patients previously treated with rituximab containing regimens. Methods Eligibility criteria included confirmed diagnosis of R/R CLL meeting criteria for treatment, prior therapy containing rituximab, age≥ 18 years, ECOG performance status ≤ 2 adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow function and willingness to comply with the required birth control measures. Patients were excluded if they had been previously exposed to any of the experimental agents, had active hepatitis B or carried HIV. Treatment consisted of ofatumumab 2000 mg (300 mg on the first cycle) intravenously on day 1 and lenalidomide 10 mg (5mg on the first cycle) on days 8–28. Treatment was administered for up to 6 cycles of 28 days duration. Patients received prophylaxis with acyclovir and trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole. Toxicity was assessed according to CTC v.4.0 and response was evaluated following the 2008 National Cancer Institute Working Group criteria. Results Seventeen patients have been enrolled and 14 have sufficient follow-up to be assessed for response. Median age of patients was 65 years (range 51–80). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 1–4) and median baseline white blood cell count was 75,000/mm3. The proportions of cases with unmutated IgvH chain and positive ZAP-70 expression were 15/17 (88%) and 13/16 (81%), respectively. There were 4/16 (25%) cases with del17p and 4/16 (25%) with del11q detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Thirteen cases (76%) were refractory to, or had relapsed after treatment containing a purine analogue. The most frequent adverse event (AE) > Grade 1 was tumor flare reaction (TFR), seen in 8/14 (57%) patients and infusion reactions seen in 6/14 (43%) patients. Four patients with TFR were managed successfully with non-steroidal anti inflammatory agents while 4 required glucocorticoids allowing continuation of therapy in all patients. The most common Grade 3+4 AE was neutropenia (11/14, 79%) although it was associated with infection in only 1 episode. One subject had early discontinuation due to toxicity (elevation in AST and ALT precluding further administration of ofatumumab). The majority of patients (11/14, 79%) required dose reduction or could not have the planned dose increase of lenalidomide after cycle 1 due to hematological toxicity. Overall 6/14 (43%) had objective response and 3/14 (21%) had stable disease for an overall clinical benefit in 64% of patients. All patients with TFR> Grade 1 had at least stable disease. Conclusion Intracycle sequential ofatumumab plus lenalidomide is well tolerated in advanced, high-risk CLL except for high rate of TFR and neutropenia without infection. Sequential ofatumumab and lenalidomide may be associated with higher rate of TFR than concomitant therapy. Approximately half the patients treated with this combination will obtain disease control. Further investigation is warranted in earlier lines and/or for more prolonged therapy. Disclosures: Costa: GSK: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for treatment of CLL.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18) ◽  
pp. 3015-3022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Gang Tong ◽  
Rong Chen ◽  
William Plunkett ◽  
David Siegel ◽  
Rajni Sinha ◽  
...  

Purpose SNS-032 is a highly selective and potent inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) 2, 7, and 9, with in vitro growth inhibitory effects and ability to induce apoptosis in malignant B cells. A phase I dose-escalation study of SNS-032 was conducted to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, biomarkers of mechanism-based pharmacodynamic (PD) activity, and clinical efficacy. Patients and Methods Parallel cohorts of previously treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma (MM) received SNS-032 as a loading dose followed by 6-hour infusion weekly for 3 weeks of each 4-week course. Results There were 19 patients with CLL and 18 with MM treated. Tumor lysis syndrome was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for CLL, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 75 mg/m2, and the most frequent grade 3 to 4 toxicity was myelosuppression. One patient with CLL had more than 50% reduction in measurable disease without improvement in hematologic parameters. Another patient with low tumor burden had stable disease for four courses. For patients with MM, no DLT was observed and MTD was not identified at up to 75 mg/m2, owing to early study closure. Two patients with MM had stable disease and one had normalization of spleen size with treatment. Biomarker analyses demonstrated mechanism-based PD activity with inhibition of Cdk7 and Cdk9, decreases in Mcl-1 and XIAP expression level, and associated CLL cell apoptosis. Conclusion SNS-032 demonstrated mechanism-based target modulation and limited clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with CLL and MM. Further single-agent, PD-based, dose and schedule modification is warranted to maximize clinical efficacy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 296-296
Author(s):  
Gurkamal S. Chatta ◽  
Leonard Joseph Appleman ◽  
David Friedland ◽  
Gail Tribble ◽  
Diwakar Davar

296 Background: First-line regimens for mTCC of the bladder are either MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) or the cisplatinum-gemcitabine doublet. There is no approved second-line option for mTCC. Both single agent D and O have response rates of 10 to 20%, and O in cisplatin-resistant patients (pts). Hence the combination of D and O may be useful in recurrent mTCC. Methods: The combination of D and O was primarily tested for efficacy in recurrent mTCC. All pts had histologically proven TCC with measurable disease, and had prior treatment with at least 1 platinum-containing regimen. D 60 mg/m2 followed by O 110 mg/m2 were administered every 3 weeks. Pts were evaluated for response every 2 cycles and were treated either till progression or for a maximum of 6 cycles. Results: 22 pts were enrolled of whom 19 were evaluable for response. Median age was 72 years (range 44 – 87). All pts had prior treatment with at least 1 cytotoxic regimen, with 8 pts having received 2 or more prior regimens. The mean number of cycles administered was 3. Of the 19 pts evaluable for efficacy, objective response was documented in two pts (both partial responses), three had stable disease, and the remaining fourteen progressed on therapy for an overall disease stabilization rate of 26%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 3.0 months (95% CI 0.2 to 5.8) and median overall survival (OS) was 7.0 months (95% CI 4.6 to 9.4). Toxicity, evaluated in all 22 patients, was relatively mild: grade 3-4 diarrhea in 6 patients, grade 3-4 hematological toxicity in 4 pts and grade 3-4 fatigue in 1 pt. No grade 3-4 neuropathy was observed and no toxic deaths were noted. The median follow-up period was 7.0 months (95% CI 4.5 to 9.5). Conclusions: The combination of D and O is active in previously treated pts with mTCC. This regimen appears to be well tolerated with overall mild toxicity. Whilst this study was not powered for assessing survival, the presence of stable disease in 26% of pts suggests that further investigation of the combination in carefully selected pts maybe warranted.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3118-3118
Author(s):  
Julie M. Roda ◽  
Aruna Gowda ◽  
Rehan Hussain ◽  
Asha Ramanunni ◽  
Amy Lehman ◽  
...  

Abstract Chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has demonstrated promising clinical activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We hypothesized that the gamma chain receptor cytokine IL-21, which is currently in clinical trials for lymphoma, might enhance the efficacy of this regimen by augmenting both immune-mediated clearance of CLL cells and a direct apoptotic mechanism involved in the homeostasis of normal B cells. CLL cells expressed variable levels of the IL-21 receptor alpha subunit (<10–80% positive cells, n = 16). IL-21 induced direct apoptosis in CLL cells from a subset of patients (40% ± 15.9 apoptotic cells; n = 9; p <0.0001), which directly correlated with increased expression of surface IL-21R (p = 0.001). The in vitro apoptosis occurred at physiologically attainable concentrations (25 ng/ml) and was time- and dose-dependent. As a single agent, IL-21 did not activate CLL cells, as evidenced by lack of surface expression of CD86, HLADR, CD95, or CD40. However, IL-21 induced phosphorylation of STAT-1Tyr-701 and STAT-3 Tyr-705 in CLL cells exhibiting > 20% apoptosis at 72 hours, whereas phosphorylation of these proteins was not seen in CLL cells failing to undergo apoptosis. Similar to normal murine B cells, IL-21-mediated death was associated with up-regulation of the pro-apoptotic BH3 only domain protein Bim, whereas Bim was not up-regulated in CLL cells insensitive to IL-21-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, silencing of Bim in primary CLL cells with siRNA antagonized IL-21-mediated death. Preliminary studies examining the mechanism of Bim up-regulation demonstrated that both total levels and phosphorylation of FOXO3AThr32 increases following IL-21 treatment. FOXO3a is involved in transcriptional regulation of Bim, and further mechanistic studies are ongoing and will be presented. Given the favorable modulation of Bim, we examined the ability of IL-21 to enhance apoptosis in response to rituximab, alemtuzumab, or fludarabine. Our studies confirm that CLL cells pre-treated with IL-21 are sensitized to rituximab and fludarabine, whereas IL-21 had no effect on fludarabine-mediated apoptosis of normal T cells. IL-21 also enhanced NK cell ADCC against rituximab-coated autologous CLL cells (42 ± 4.4% rituximab-specific lysis vs. 28 ± 3.1% at an E:T ratio of 25:1; p < 0.0001). These data provide evidence that IL-21 promotes direct apoptosis through induction of Bim and also enhances fludarabine- and rituximab-mediated apoptosis. Additionally, IL-21 enhances autologous innate immune activation of NK cells toward primary CLL cells coated with rituximab. Overall, these findings provide justification for combination studies of IL-21 with fludarabine and rituximab chemoimmunotherapy in CLL and point to Bim induction as a pharmacodynamic endpoint to predicting surrogate biologic activity of IL-21 in vivo as part of planned clinical trials with this agent.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1746-1751 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Hainsworth ◽  
Sharlene Litchy ◽  
John H. Barton ◽  
Gerry Ann Houston ◽  
Robert C. Hermann ◽  
...  

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of first-line single-agent rituximab, followed by re-treatment with rituximab at 6-month intervals, in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Patients and Methods: Forty-four previously untreated patients with CLL/SLL received rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. All patients were required to have one or more indications for treatment. Patients with objective response or stable disease continued to receive identical 4-week rituximab courses at 6-month intervals, for a total of four courses. Results: The objective response rate after the first course of rituximab was 51% (4% complete responses). Twenty-eight patients received one or more additional courses of rituximab. At present, the overall response rate is 58%, with 9% complete responses. After a median follow-up of 20 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 18.6 months, and the 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 62% and 49%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with only two episodes of grade 3 to 4 infusion-related toxicity. No cumulative toxicity or opportunistic infections occurred. Conclusion: Single-agent rituximab, used at a standard dose and schedule, is active in the first-line treatment of patients with CLL/SLL, producing substantially higher response rates than previously reported in relapsed or refractory patients (51% v 13%, respectively). Re-treatment with rituximab at 6-month intervals is well tolerated. The PFS time of 18.6 months in patients with CLL/SLL seems shorter than the 36- to 40-month median PFSs previously reported with first-line plus maintenance rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma. Additional follow-up is required to fully assess the impact of this treatment strategy.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (30) ◽  
pp. 7697-7702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
Charles C. Cunningham ◽  
Anatoliy K. Golenkov ◽  
Anna G. Turkina ◽  
Steven C. Novick ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of oblimersen sodium in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients and Methods Eligible patients had relapsed or refractory CLL after treatment with fludarabine. Oblimersen was administered at doses ranging from 3 to 7 mg/kg/d as a 5-day continuous intravenous infusion in cycle 1 and as a 7-day continuous intravenous infusion in subsequent cycles every 3 weeks in stable or responding patients. Results Forty patients were enrolled and treated (14 patients in phase I and 26 patients in phase II). Dose-limiting reactions in phase I included hypotension and fever, and the MTD for phase II dosing was established at 3 mg/kg/d. Two (8%) of 26 assessable patients achieved a partial response. Other evidence of antitumor activity included ≥ 50% reduction in splenomegaly (seven of 17 patients; 41%), complete disappearance of hepatomegaly (two of seven patients; 29%), ≥ 50% reduction of lymphadenopathy (seven of 22 patients; 32%), and ≥ 50% reduction in circulating lymphocyte counts (11 of 22 patients; 50%). Adverse events included transient hypotension, fever, fatigue, night sweats, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, hypokalemia, and cough. Plasma concentrations of oblimersen (parent drug) and its major metabolites were variable. Renal clearance represented only a small portion of total parent drug clearance. Conclusion Dosing with oblimersen sodium in patients with CLL is limited by development of a cytokine release syndrome that is characterized by fever, hypotension, and back pain. Oblimersen sodium has modest single-agent activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced CLL, and further evaluation of its activity in combination with cytotoxic drugs is warranted.


2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1032-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Kotkowska ◽  
Ewa Wawrzyniak ◽  
Jerzy Z. Blonski ◽  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Anna Korycka-Wolowiec

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7556-7556
Author(s):  
Hun Ju Lee ◽  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
Tanya Siddiqi ◽  
Jacqueline Claudia Barrientos ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
...  

7556 Background: Cirmtuzumab (Cirm) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the tumor promoting activity of ROR1 and had demonstrated additive/synergistic activity with many anti-cancer agents including ibrutinib (Ibr). Methods: Patients (Pts) with relapsed or refractory (RR) MCL or treatment naïve (TN) or RR CLL were enrolled. In Part 1 (Dose Escalation), doses of Cirm IV q2wks x5 then q4wks of 2-16 mg/kg and 300 or 600 mg were examined. Safety of Cirm alone was assessed during the first 28 days, then Ibr was started at approved doses for each indication. Cirm 600 mg IV q2wks x3 then q4wks in combination with Ibr starting day 0 was chosen as the recommended dosing regimen for use in Part 2 (Expansion) and Part 3 (CLL only, Cirm/Ibr vs. Ibr alone). Results: Twelve evaluable MCL pts were enrolled into Part 1, and 5 into Part 2. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1-5), including pts relapsing after Ibr (4), auto-SCT (3), auto-SCT/ allo-SCT (1), auto-SCT/CAR-T (1). In CLL, 34 evaluable pts (12 TN and 22 RR) enrolled into Part 1 (18) or Part 2 (16). At least 74% of CLL pts in Parts 1 and 2 were high risk as determined by unmutated IGHV, del17p, and/or del11q. In Part 3, 22 evaluable pts received Cirm/Ibr (15) or Ibr (7). As of the 30OCT2020 safety cut-off for MCL and CLL, common TEAEs (all grades) included diarrhea (41%), contusion (39%), fatigue (39%), URI (31%), hypertension (25%) arthralgia (23%). Grade ≥3 neutropenia was 13% and thrombocytopenia 1%. There were no Cirm dose reductions or discontinuations for toxicity. Overall, Cirm did not appear to negatively impact the safety of Ibr. Efficacy (MCL): As of the 02FEB2021 efficacy cutoff, the best response of 17 evaluable pts in Parts 1 and 2 included an objective response rate (ORR) of 82%, 41% CR/CMR, 41% PR, 12% SD, and 6% PD. CR/CMR remain durable from 8-28+ mos. Most responses occurred rapidly after ̃3 mos of Cirm/Ibr. Notably, responses were achieved in all pts who received prior SCT+/- CAR-T (4CR, 1PR) or prior Ibr (2CR, 2PR). At a median follow-up of 14.6 mos, the median PFS (mPFS) had not been reached (NR) (95% CI: 17.5, NA). Efficacy (CLL): The best response of 34 evaluable pts in Parts 1 and 2 included 91% ORR, 3% CR, 88% PR/PR-L, 9% SD, 0% PD. In Part 3, both arms achieved 100% ORR (all PRs). At a median follow-up of 20.2 mos, the mPFS was NR (95% CI: NA, NA), and the PFS estimate at 24 months was 95% for R/R, and 87% for TN, respectively, for evaluable CLL pts receiving Cirm/Ibr. Conclusions: Cirm/Ibr is a well-tolerated, active regimen in both MCL and CLL. For MCL, the mPFS of NR (95% CI: 17.5, NA) and CRR (41%), with all CRs remaining without PD, compare favorably to mPFS of 12.8 mos (95% CI 8.5-16.6) and CRR (20%) reported for single agent Ibr (Rule 2017). For CLL, the high ORR and PFS are encouraging, particularly for RR CLL. The study is ongoing, with MCL enrollment expanded to study Cirm + Ibr in pts who have had a suboptimal response to an Ibr regimen, or who have failed other approved BTKi agents. Clinical trial information: NCT03088878.


2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (11) ◽  
pp. 1402-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
Alessandra Tedeschi ◽  
Paul M. Barr ◽  
Carolyn Owen ◽  
...  

Leukemia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 991-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Buechele ◽  
T Baessler ◽  
S Wirths ◽  
J U Schmohl ◽  
B J Schmiedel ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19512-e19512
Author(s):  
Kyeryoung Lee ◽  
Zongzhi Liu ◽  
Meng Ma ◽  
Yun Mai ◽  
Christopher Gilman ◽  
...  

e19512 Background: Targeted therapy is an important treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, optimal strategies for deploying small molecule inhibitors or antibody therapies in the real world are not well understood, largely due to a lack of outcomes data. We implemented a novel temporal phenotyping algorithm pipeline to derive lines of therapy (LOT) and disease progression in CLL patients. Here, the CLL treatment pattern and time to the next treatment (TTNT) were analyzed in real-world data (RWD) using patient electronic health records. Methods: We identified a CLL cohort with LOT from the Mount Sinai Data Warehouse (2003-2020). Each LOT consisted of either a single agent or combinations defined by NCCN CLL guidelines. We developed a natural language processing (NLP)-based temporal phenotyping approach to automatically identify the number of lines and therapeutic regimens. The sequence of treatment and time interval for each patient were derived from the systematic treatment data. Time to event analysis and multivariate (i.e., age, gender, race, other treatment patterns) Cox proportional hazard (CoxPH) models were used to analyze the patterns and predictors of TTNT. Results: Four hundred eleven CLL patients received 1 to 7 LOTs. Ibrutinib was the predominant 1st LOT (40.8% of patients) followed by anti-CD20-based antibody therapies and chemotherapy in 30.6 and 19.2% of patients, respectively, followed by Acalabrutinib, Venetoclax, and Idelalisib in 3.4, 2.7, and 0.7% of patients, respectively (Table 1). The 2nd to 5th LOT showed the same or similar trends. We next analyzed the TTNT in the 1st line of each therapeutic class. Acalabrutinib resulted in a longer median TTNT than Ibrutinib. Both Acalabrutinib and Ibrutinib showed longer TTNT compared to Venetoclax (median TTNTs were 742 and 598 vs. 373 days: HR = 0.23, p=0.015 and HR = 0.48, p=0.03, respectively). In addition, patients with age equal to or older than 65 showed longer TNNT (HR=0.16, p=0.016). Conclusions: Our result shows the potential of RWD usage in clinical decision making as real-world evidence reported here is consistent with results derived from clinical trial data. Linking this study to genetic data and other covariates affecting treatment outcomes may provide additional insights into the optimal sequences of the targeted therapies in CLL. Table 1: Therapeutic class and patient numbers (%) in each line.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document