Complete Molecular Remission (CMR 4.5) of CML Is Induced Faster by Dose – Optimized Imatinib and Predicts Better Survival - Results From the Randomized CML-Study IV

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 67-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rüdiger Hehlmann ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Benjamin Hanfstein ◽  
Martin C. Müller ◽  
Annette Schreiber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 67 Dose optimized imatinib (IM) at doses of 400– 800mg has been shown to induce faster and deeper cytogenetic and molecular – responses than standard IM (400mg/day). Since complete molecular remission (CMR 4.5) identifies a subgroup of patients who may stay in remission even after discontinuation of treatment, it was of interest to analyse whether CMR 4.5 is reached faster with dose optimized IM and whether CMR 4.5 correlates with survival. CMR 4 and CMR 4.5 are defined as ≤ 0.01% BCR-ABL IS or ≥ 4. log reduction and ≤ 0.0032% BCR-ABL IS or ≥ 4.5 log reduction, respectively, from IRIS baseline as determined by real-time PCR. CML-Study IV is a five arm randomized study of IM 400 mg vs IM 400 mg + IFN vs. IM 400 mg + Ara C vs. IM after IFN failure vs. IM 800 mg. In the IM 800 arm, a 6 weeks run in period at IM 400 mg was followed by a dose increase to 800 mg and then by a dose reduction according to tolerability. Grade 3 or 4 adverse effects (AE) were to be avoided. From July 2002 to March 2012 a total of 1551 patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML were randomized of whom 1525 were evaluable. Median age was 52 years, 88% were EUTOS low risk, 12% high risk, 36% were Euro score low risk, 52% intermediate and 12% high risk, 38% were Sokal low risk, 38% intermediate and 24% high risk. 113 patients were transplanted, 246 received 2nd generation TKI. 152 patients have died, 90 of CML or unknown reasons, 62 of not directly CML-related causes. After a median observation time of 67,5 months 6 years OS was 88.2% and PFS 85.6%. CCR, MMR, CMR 4 and CMR 4,5 were achieved significantly faster with dose optimized IM (400 – 800 mg). No significant differences in remission rates were observed between IM 400 mg and the combination arms IM 400 mg + IFN and IM 400 mg + Ara C, whereas IM after IFN failure thus far yielded significantly slower response rates. After 4 years CCR rates were for IM 400, IM 400 + IFN, IM 400 + Ara C, IM 400 after IFN, and IM 800, 80%, 75%, 73%, 59% and 80%, respectively, MMR rates 84%, 77%, 82%, 61% and 88%, CMR 4 rates 57%, 55%, 55%, 40% and 65%, and CMR 4.5 rates 40%,42%, 42%, 28% and 52%, respectively. CMR 4 was reached after a median of 27 months with IM 800 and 41.5 months with IM 400. CMR 4.5 was reached after a median of 41.5 months with IM 800 and 63 months with IM 400. EUTOS low risk patients reached all remissions faster than EUTOS high risk patients. The differences of CMR 4 rates between IM 800 and IM 400 at 3 years were 13% and at 4 years 8%, and of CMR 4.5 rates at 3 years 10% and at 4 years 13%. Grade 3 and 4 AE were not different between IM 400 and dose optimized IM 800. Independent of treatment approach, CMR 4 and more clearly CMR 4.5 at 3 years predicted better OS and PFS, if compared with patients without CMR 4 or CMR 4.5, respectively. CMR 4 and 4.5 were stable. After a median duration of CMR 4 of 3.7 years only 4 of 792 patients with CMR 4 have progressed. Life expectancy with CMR 4 and 4.5 was identical to that of the age matched population. We conclude that dose optimized IM induces CMR 4.5 faster than IM 400 and that CMR 4 and CMR 4.5 at 3 years are associated with a survival advantage. Dose optimized IM may provide an improved therapeutic basis for unmaintained treatment discontinuation in patients with CML. Disclosures: Hehlmann: Novartis: Research Funding. Müller:Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Hochhaus:Novartis, BMS, MSD, Ariad, Pfizer: Consultancy Other, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Effect of dose-optimized imatinib (IM) 800 mg on deep molecular responses (CMR 4.5) and prediction of survival: Results from the randomized CML-study IV.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7051-7051
Author(s):  
Rüdiger Hehlmann ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Benjamin Hanfstein ◽  
Martin C. Müller ◽  
Annette Schreiber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Landmark Analyses ◽  
Better Than

7051 Background: Since complete molecular remission (CMR 4.5) defines a subgroup of patients who may stay in remission even after discontinuation of treatment, we analysed whether CMR 4.5 is reached faster with dose optimized IM 800 mg and whether the achievement of CMR 4.5 at specified points in time results in better survival than the achievement of less deep remissions. Methods: Confirmed CMR 4 and CMR 4.5 are defined as ≤ 0.01% BCR-ABL IS or ≥ 4 log reduction and ≤ 0.0032% BCR-ABL IS or ≥ 4.5 log reduction, respectively, from standardized baseline as determined by real-time PCR in 2 independent analyses. Details on CML-Study IV have been published (Hehlmann et al., JCO 2011). Cumulative incidences were estimated under consideration of competing risks. Landmark analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of different remissions at 4 years on survival. Results: Of 1551 randomized patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML 1525 were evaluable. Median age was 52 years, 88% were EUTOS low risk, 12% high risk. 113 patients were transplanted (73 in first chronic phase), 246 received 2nd generation TKI. 152 patients have died. After a median observation time of 67.5 months, 6-year OS was 88.2%.CMR 4.5 was reached after a median of about 76.1 months with IM 800 and 107.3 months with IM 400. EUTOS low-risk patients reached all remissions faster than high-risk patients. Independent of treatment approach CMR 4.5 at 4 years predicted OS significantly better than complete cytogenetic remission (p=0.043), but not significantly better than major molecular remission (MMR) or CMR4. After a median observation of 3.9 years 1 of 626 patients with CMR 4 has progressed. Only six of the 394 patients with CMR 4.5 have died after a median observation time of 3.0 years, no patient has progressed. An additional finding was that achieving MMR at 3 and at 6 months predicts faster achievement of CMR 4.5. Conclusions: We conclude that dose optimized IM 800 induces CMR 4.5 faster than IM 400 and that CMR 4.5 at 4 years is associated with a survival advantage. Dose optimized IM 800 may provide an improved therapeutic basis for treatment discontinuation in patients with CML. Clinical trial information: NCT00055874.

scholarly journals A Novel Prognostic Model That Is Superior to FLIPI-1 and FLIPI-2 and Integrates Clinical and Treatment Factors to Predict Progression-Free Survival and Early Treatment Failure in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in the GALLIUM Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2872-2872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farheen Mir ◽  
Andrew Grigg ◽  
Michael Herold ◽  
Wolfgang Hiddemann ◽  
Robert Marcus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Prognostic Variables ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Risk Disease ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Progression of disease within 24 months of initial therapy (POD24) is associated with poor survival in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). Existing prognostic models, such as FLIPI-1 and FLIPI-2, show poor sensitivity for POD24, and are derived from cohorts lacking bendamustine-treated patients. More accurate predictive models based on current standard therapies are needed to identify patients with high-risk disease. The Phase III GALLIUM trial (NCT01332968) compared the safety and efficacy of standard chemotherapy regimens plus rituximab (R) or obinutuzumab (G) in patients with previously untreated FL. Using GALLIUM data, we developed a novel risk stratification model to predict both PFS and POD24 in FL patients after first-line immunochemotherapy. Methods: Enrolled patients were aged ≥18 years with previously untreated FL (grades 1-3a), Stage III/IV disease (or Stage II with bulk), and ECOG PS ≤2, and required treatment by GELF criteria. Patients were randomized to receive either G- or R-based immunochemotherapy, followed by maintenance with the same antibody in responders. The chemotherapy arm (CHOP, CVP, or bendamustine) was selected by each study center. POD24 was defined as progressive disease or death due to disease within 24 months of randomization (noPOD24 = no progression or lymphoma-related death in that period). The most strongly prognostic variables, based on PFS hazard ratios, were estimated using penalized multivariate Cox regression methodology via an Elastic Net model. Selected variables were given equal weights, and a clinical score was formed by summating the number of risk factors for each patient. Low- and high-risk categories were determined using a cut-off that provided the best balance between true- and false-positives for PFS. PFS correlation and sensitivity to predict POD24 were assessed. The data used are from an updated GALLIUM efficacy analysis (data cut-off: April 2018; median follow-up: 57 months). Results: 1202 FL patients were enrolled. Based on data availability and biological plausibility (i.e. could reasonably be linked with high-risk disease), 25 potential clinical and treatment-related prognostic variables were entered into the Elastic Net model (Table). A model containing 11 factors was retained by the methodology and chosen as the best model (Table). Patients were categorized as 'low risk' if they scored between 0 and 3 (n=521/1000 patients with complete data) and as 'high risk' if they scored between 4 and 11 (n=479/1000 patients). At 2 years, the PFS rate was 84.5% in the whole FL population. Using our model, 2-year PFS for high-risk patients was 77% compared with 79.9% for FLIPI-1 and FLIPI-2. In low-risk patients, 2-year PFS was 92% compared with 87.9% for FLIPI-1 and 87.6% for FLIPI-2 (low-intermediate-risk patients). Our model increased the inter-group difference in 2-year PFS rate from 8% (FLIPI-1) and 7.7% (FLIPI-2) to 15%. At 3 years, the inter-group difference increased from 6.9% (FLIPI-1) and 9% (FLIPI-2) to 17% (Figure). Sensitivity for a high-risk score to predict POD24 was 73% using our model compared with 55% for FLIPI-1 and 52% for FLIPI-2 (based on 127 POD24 and 873 noPOD24 patients with complete data). Excluding patients who received CVP, which is now rarely used, resulted in an inter-group difference in PFS of 15% at 2 years and 16.8% at 3 years. A sensitivity analysis showed that inclusion of the 9 clinical factors only (i.e. removal of CVP and R treatment as variables) formed a more basic scoring system (low-risk patients, 1-3; high-risk patients, 4-9); the inter-group difference in PFS was 16.5% at 2 years and 17.6% at 3 years. However, sensitivity for POD24 decreased to 56%. Conclusion: Our clinical prognostic model was more accurate at discriminating patients likely to have poor PFS than either FLIPI-1 or FLIPI-2, and its prognostic value was sustained over time. Our model also identified the FL population at risk of POD24 with greater sensitivity. Variables such as age and bone marrow involvement were not retained by our model, and thus may not have a major impact in the current era of therapy. Factors such as sum of the products of lesion diameters were included, as this captures tumor burden more accurately than presence of bulk disease. Future studies will aim to improve the accuracy of the model by considering gene expression-based prognostic markers and DNA sequencing to form a combined clinico-genomic model. Disclosures Mir: F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Employment. Hiddemann:F. Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Marcus:F. Hoffman-La Roche: Other: Travel support and lecture fees; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support and lecture fees ; Gilead: Consultancy. Seymour:Genentech Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bolen:Roche: Other: Ownership interests PLC*. Knapp:Roche: Employment. Launonen:Launonen: Other: Ownership interests none PLC; Travel, accommodation, expenses; Novartis: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Other: Ownership interests none PLC; Travel. accommodation, expenses; Roche: Employment, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses. Mattiello:Roche: Employment. Nielsen:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Other: Ownership interests PLC. Oestergaard:Roche: Employment, Other: Ownership interests PLC. Wenger:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Ownership interests PLC. Casulo:Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding.

The EUTOS Survival Score Is Preferable over the Sokal Score for Prognosis of Long-Term Survival of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 595-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Pfirrmann ◽  
Joerg Hasford ◽  
Susanne Saussele ◽  
Anna Turkina ◽  
Witold Prejzner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Survival Score ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Sokal Score

Abstract Introduction: The in-study and out-study sections of the European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) registry comprise data on imatinib-treated adult patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who were prospectively enrolled in clinical studies or registries between 2002 and 2006. All patients diagnosed with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML were eligible for analysis. The new EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) score was developed in 2,205 in-study patients (Blood 2014; 124(21):153). Its purpose is the discrimination of three risk groups with clinically significantly different probabilities of dying from CML. The score was validated in 1,120 out-study patients. Aims: Up to now, many investigators still apply the Sokal score for the prognostic discrimination of CML-patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The Sokal score allocated more than 20% of chronic-phase patients to the high-risk group while it was 12% with the new ELTS score. Long-term outcome with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) suggests that the allocation of more than 20% chronic-phase CML patients into a high-risk group is too pessimistic. The focus of this analysis was the comparison of risk group allocations and prognosis between the two scores. Methods: Survival time was calculated from the date of start of treatment to death or to the latest follow-up date. Survival was censored at the time of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first chronic phase. Cumulative incidence probabilities (CIPs) of dying of CML were compared with the Gray test and overall survival probabilities with the log-rank test. As "death due to CML", only death after confirmed disease progression was regarded. Progression was defined in accordance with the recommendations of the ELN (Baccarani et al, Blood 2013). Level of significance was 0.05. Results: Both registries combined, the 3,325 patients had a median observation time of 6.1 years. Six-year overall survival probability was 91% (95% confidence interval (CI): 89-92%). Death was due to CML in 142 of 309 deceased patients (46%).The 6-year CIP of dying of CML was 4% (CI: 4-5%). From low to high risk groups, the Sokal score resulted in 6-year CIPs of 3% (n=1358 (41%), CI: 2-4%), 4% (n=1209 (36%), CI: 3-5%), and 8% (n=758 (23%), CI: 6-11%) and the ELTS score in 6-year CIPs of 2% (n=2030 (61%), CI: 2-3%), 6% (n=898 (27%), CI: 4-7%), and 13% (n=397 (12%), CI: 10-17%). Of the 758 patients allocated to high risk by the Sokal score, the ELTS score classified 165 (22%) as low risk and 265 (35%) as intermediate risk. Compared to the 328 high-risk patients (43%) according to both scores (6-year CIP of dying: 13%, CI: 9-17%), the CIPs of dying were significantly lower for the 165 low-risk patients (p=0.0062, 6-year CIP: 5%, CI: 2-9%) and for the 265 intermediate-risk patients (p=0.0050, 6-year CIP: 5%, CI: 3-9%). These 430 Sokal high but ELTS non-high-risk patients (6-year OS: 89%. CI: 86-92%) showed significantly higher OS probabilities than the 328 Sokal and ELTS high-risk patients (p=0.030, 6-year OS: 81%. CI: 76-85%). Of the 2030 patients identified as low risk by the ELTS score, the Sokal score allocated 603 (30%) to the intermediate- and 165 (8%) to the high-risk group. Without significant CIP differences to the latter group, at 6 years, the CIP of dying was 2% (CI: 1-3%) in the 1262 low-risk and also 2% in the 603 intermediate-risk patients (CI: 1-3%). The OS probabilities of the 768 non-low-risk patients according to the Sokal score (6-year OS: 93%. CI: 91-95%) were not significantly different from the 1262 classified as low-risk by both scores (6-year OS: 95%. CI: 93-96%). Conclusions: To be able to perform comparisons between the various prognostic groups suggested by the Sokal and the EUTOS survival score with a reasonable power, data of in- and out-study samples were combined. The Sokal score allocated an absolute difference of 12% (n=430) more patients to the high-risk groups than the EUTOS survival score. As these patients had significantly and clinically relevantly lower CIPs and higher OS probabilities, the allocation of the Sokal score was not appropriate. Contrarily, the long-term outcome of 768 patients assessed as low-risk by the ELTS and non-low-risk by the Sokal score was not different from the outcome of 1262 assesses as low-risk patients by both scores. For prognosis of long-term survival outcome, the use of the EUTOS survival score is recommended. Disclosures Pfirrmann: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hasford:Novartis: Research Funding. Saussele:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant. Turkina:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis Pharma: Consultancy. Prejzner:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Steegmann:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Simonsson:Novartis Pharma: Research Funding. Zaritskey:University of Heidelberg: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Zackova:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Janssen:Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Cervantes:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; CTI-Baxter: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Hehlmann:Novartis Pharma: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Comparing the Prognostic Significance of Early Predictors of Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Treated with Imatinib - an Analysis of the Randomized CML-Study IV

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 156-156
Author(s):  
Benjamin Hanfstein ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Rüdiger Hehlmann ◽  
Susanne Saussele ◽  
Philipp Erben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Intervention ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Early prediction of outcome using response-related predictive landmarks has become a major paradigm in the clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Several studies have shown the predictive impact of 10% BCR-ABLIS at 3 and 6 months for different tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The question, which landmark should define treatment failure and determine treatment intervention has been discussed vividly. However, an objective analysis of quality criteria for different early prognostic landmarks is lacking up to now. Here we compare sensitivity, specificity and the proportion of later disease progressions predicted by 3-month and 6-month landmarks in imatinib-treated patients of the CML-study IV. Methods: A total of 1,303 newly diagnosed patients were assigned to an imatinib-based treatment arm of CML-Study IV by April 2010. Median follow-up was 7.1 years. The number of molecular assessments was as follows: n=789 (at 6 months), n=692 (at 3 months) and n=301 (at 3 months and at diagnosis, without pretreatment). Gene expression levels were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. At 3 and 6 months, a BCR-ABL ratio was calculated using ABL as reference gene and standardized according to the international scale (BCR-ABLIS). In addition, at 3 months and at diagnosis a BCR-ABL ratio was calculated using beta-glucuronidase (GUS) as reference gene in order to ensure linearity of measurement at diagnosis. The log reduction at 3 months was calculated from the BCR-ABL ratio at 3 months and at diagnosis. Due to the time-dependent nature of censored survival data, the sensitivity and specificity at eight years were calculated using the method by Heagerty et al. (Biometrics 2000). Overall survival (OS) is defined by the absence of death from any reason, progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as survival in the absence of progression to accelerated or blastic phase. Landmark analyses were performed to compare survival outcomes according to Kaplan-Meier. Results:Comparing the 10% BCR-ABLIS landmark at 3 and 6 months, 8-year OS and PFS rates are equal or comparable (table). In contrast, sensitivity and specificity differ substantially with an advantage in favor of sensitivity for the 3-month landmark and in favor of specificity for the 6-month landmark. This difference is paralleled by a smaller proportion of high-risk patients and less progressions identified by the 6-month landmark. From a clinical point of view the 6-month landmark is not only less than half as sensitive, moreover a treatment intervention at 6 months might also prevent less progressions due to the delay of 3 months. The half-log reduction landmark at 3 months is as sensitive as 10% BCR-ABLIS at the same time. However, it shows improved specificity and defines the smallest proportion of high-risk patients. Conclusion: The 10% BCR-ABLIS landmark, which is currently defining treatment failure at 6 months according to European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria, fails to detect the majority of patients with later disease progression. Less than a half-log reduction of individual baseline BCR-ABL transcript levels at 3 months on treatment identifies patients with later progressions as sensitive but with higher specificity as compared to 10% BCR-ABLIS. Abstract 156. Table Prognostic landmark 8-year OS (%) 8-year PFS (%) P-value for PFS Sensitivity to predict progression (%) Specificity to predict progression (%) High-risk patients Disease progressions classified as high-risk / total 3 months (n=692) 10% BCR-ABLIS 88 vs. 96 82 vs. 90 0.001 41.1 74.6 191 (28%) 32/74 (43%) 6 months (n=789) 10% BCR-ABLIS 88 vs. 96 84 vs. 95 0.001 18.2 93.8 95 (12%) 17/74 (23%) 1% BCR-ABLIS 90 vs. 97 89 vs. 97 <0.001 39.6 68.6 291 (37%) 46/74 (62%) 3 months (n=301) 0.5-log reduction 81 vs. 95 75 vs. 94 <0.001 42.6 86.9 48 (16%) 10/24 (42%) Disclosures Hanfstein: Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Hehlmann:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Saussele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Pfizer: Honoraria, Travel, Travel Other. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Neubauer:MedUpdate: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kneba:Novartis: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Pfirrmann:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Hochhaus:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Müller:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Randomized Comparison of Imatinib 800 Mg Vs. Imatinib 400 Mg +/- IFN in Newly Diagnosed BCR/ABL Positive Chronic Phase CML: Analysis of Molecular Remission at 12 Months; The German CML-Study IV.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 339-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudiger Hehlmann ◽  
Susanne Jung-Munkwitz ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Armin Leitner ◽  
Nadine Pletsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Abstract 339 Initial reports that high dose imatinib results in better responses more rapidly than standard dose imatinib remain controversial. The German CML Study Group therefore compared imatinib 800 mg (IM 800) with standard dose imatinib +/- IFN (IM 400, IM 400 + IFN) in newly diagnosed, not pretreated CML with regard to molecular response at 12 months and survival in a randomized clinical trial. By April 30, 2009, 1026 chronic phase CML patients have been randomized (326 for IM 400, 338 for IM 800, 351 for imatinib + IFN). Comparison was for molecular and cytogenetic remissions, overall (OS) and progression free (PFS) survival and toxicity. 1015 patients were evaluable at baseline, 904 for survival analysis (294 for IM 400, 286 for IM 800, 324 for IM 400+IFN), 790 for cytogenetic (analysis of at least 20 metaphases required) and 823 for molecular response. The three treatment groups were similar regarding median age, sex, median values of Hb, WBC, platelets and distribution according to the EURO score. Median follow-up was 25 months in the imatinib 800 mg arm and 42 months in the imatinib 400 mg +/-IFN arms. The difference is due to the fact that at first the IM 800 arm was designed for high risk patients only and opened up to all risk groups in July 2005. The median daily doses of imatinib were 626 mg (209- 800 mg) in the IM 800 arm and 400 mg (184- 720 mg) in the IM 400 +/- IFN arms. Of 218 patients receiving imatinib 800 mg and evaluable for dosage at 12 months, 100 (45.9%) received more than 700 mg/day, 27 (12.4%) 601-700 mg, 37 (17.0%) 501-600 mg, 48 (22.0%) 401-500 mg and only 6 (2.8%) 400 mg/day or less. The cumulative incidences at 12 months of complete cytogenetic remission (CCR) were 52.3%, 64.9% and 50.6%, and of major molecular remission (MMR) 30.2%, 54.3% and 34.6% with IM 400, IM 800 and IM 400 +IFN, respectively. The cumulative incidences of achieving CCR and MMR with IM 400, IM 800 and IM 400+IFN at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after start of treatment are summarized in the table. MMR at 12 months was reached faster with IM 800 than with IM 400 (p=0.0003) or IM400+IFN (p=0.0131). Optimal molecular response (OMR=<0.01% BCR-ABL according to the international scale) was reached with IM 800 after a median of 31.3 months vs. 47.5 and 42.5 months with IM 400 +/- IFN. Also CCR was reached faster with IM 800 (p<0.01). The more rapid achievement of MMR with IM 800 was observed in low and intermediate risk patients with little or no difference in high risk patients. In an analysis “as treated” patients receiving more than 600 mg/day reached remissions faster than those receiving lower dosages (CCR after a median of 7.8 vs. 8.9 months, MMR after a median of 10.4 vs. 12.9 months). At the time of this evaluation, OS (92% at 5 years) and PFS (88% at 5 years) showed no difference. Type and severity of adverse events (AE) at 12 months did not differ from those expected (all grades and grades III/IV). Hematologic (thrombocytopenia 7% vs. 4%) and non-hematologic AEs (gastrointestinal 35% vs. 15-24% and edema 29% vs. 16-19%) were more frequent with IM 800, fatigue (14% vs. 7-13%) and neurological problems (15% vs. 6-7%) more frequent with IM 400 + IFN (all grades). These data show a significantly faster achievement of MMR at 12 months with IM 800 as compared to IM 400 +/-IFN. So far, this faster response rate did not translate into better OS or PFS. Hence IM 400 should still be considered as standard of care. With some individual dose adjustments tolerability of IM 800 was good. Longer observation is required to determine whether this more rapid achievement of MMR and CCR will have a long term impact or not. Disclosures: German CML Study Group: Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; European LeukemiaNet: Research Funding; Kompetenznetz Leukämie: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.

Steady-State Imatinib Trough Levels as Well as Dose Interruptions Are Associated with Clinical Response (CCyR and MMR) and Adverse Events (AEs) in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Receiving IM as Frontline Therapy.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2213-2213
Author(s):  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Yen Lin Chia ◽  
Camille Granvil ◽  
François Guilhot ◽  
Brian J. Druker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Cumulative Dose ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Trough Levels

Abstract Abstract 2213 Poster Board II-190 Background: Correlations between IM trough plasma levels (Cmin) and clinical response have been previously reported [Picard et al. Blood 2007; Larson et al. (IRIS) Blood 2008; Guilhot et al. (TOPS) ASH 2008]. This analysis correlates IM Cmin on Day 29 of initial treatment with complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular responses (MMR) at 12 months and with cumulative Grade 3&4 toxicity over 12 months based on data pooled from 2 studies, IRIS (400 mg qd) and TOPS (400 mg bid (800 mg/daily) vs 400 mg qd), in newly diagnosed, previously untreated, Ph+ CML-CP. Methods: Steady-state Cmin was defined as predose blood level collected within ±3 hours of the scheduled dosing time on Day 29 without any dose interruptions within 5 days prior to PK sampling. The correlation between IM Cmin and CCyR and MMR at 12 months was studied by two approaches: 1) analysis of outcomes by quartile groups based on patients' IM Cmin levels; 2) logistic regression analysis with Cmin as a continuous variable plus Sokal risk scores and cumulative days with any dose interruptions during the initial 12 months. Safety parameters included Grade 3&4 AEs, as well as all frequently-occurring (>10%) AEs of any grade that occurred during the 12 months. Patients with missing covariates were excluded. Results: Steady-state IM Cmin trough levels were available in 526 patients: 319 in IRIS and 207 from TOPS. At the time of assessment most patients received either 400 mg or 800 mg; 8 patients received reduced doses (6 at 300 mg; 2 at 600 mg). The median IM Cmin [25-75% quartiles] for 400 mg in the pooled dataset was 943 ng/mL [688-1280 ng/mL], and that for 800 mg was 2910 ng/mL [2333-3900 ng/mL]. IM Cmin showed large inter-patient variability for both 400 mg and 800 mg dose groups (52.7% and 39.9%, respectively). Both CCyR and MMR rates at 12 months were significantly correlated with IM Cmin on Day 29. Besides Cmin on Day 29, Sokal risk scores and cumulative dose interruptions (due either to treatment-related toxicities or non-adherence) were significant covariates for 12 month CCyR and MMR. Patients with high Sokal scores (H) had lower CCyR and MMR rates than those with low Sokal scores (L), 64% (H), 69% (intermediate (I)), and 83% (L), respectively, for CCyR, and 37%, 48%, and 59%, respectively, for MMR. Response rates at 12 months were significantly lower for patients with cumulative dose interruptions > 28 days (in the first 12 months): 45% vs 76% for CCyR, and 27% vs 48% for MMR. Modeling predicts that at a Cmin level of 1000 ng/mL and assuming no or minimal dose interruptions, the CCyR at 12 months would be 85%, 78%, and 68% for L, I, and H Sokal risk patients, respectively, and for MMR 55%, 45% and 36%, respectively. If the Cmin were 2000 ng/mL, the CCyR at 12 months would be 93%, 89%, and 83% for L, I, and H Sokal risk patients, respectively, and for MMR 65%, 55% and 44%, respectively. The predicted CCyR and MMR would be lower if there were dose interruptions. Patients who had Grade 3&4 AEs over first 12 months period (n=136) had a higher IM Cmin on Day 29 (median [25-75% quartiles], 1985 [982-2943] ng/mL vs 1010 [728-1468] ng/mL, P<0.001), than those without (n=390) as well as longer cumulative dose interruptions (20 [8-41] days vs 0 [0-2] days, P<0.001), lower CCyR rate (66%; 77/117 vs 75%; 277/369, P=0.05), and lower MMR rate (37%; 49/131 vs 48%; 155/323, P=0.006). Most Grade 3&4 AEs were treatment-related hematologic AEs with median times to onset between 50-63 days. Regression analysis showed the correlation between hematologic Grade 3&4 AEs and IM Cmin level for the population (Figure). Among all-grade non-hematologic AEs, rash and vomiting were associated with higher IM Cmin levels. Conclusion: IRIS+TOPS pooled data confirmed earlier findings that higher steady-state IM levels correlate with better CCyR and MMR responses but also with more Grade 3&4 treatment-related toxicities. Dose interruptions compromise CCyR and MMR rates at 12 months. IM Cmin levels provide additional information together with clinical response and tolerability to inform dose changes for individual patients. Disclosures: Larson: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Chia:Novartis: Employment. Granvil:Novartis: Employment. Guilhot:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Druker:OHSU patent #843 - Mutate ABL Kinase Domains: Patents & Royalties; MolecularMD: Equity Ownership; Roche: Consultancy; Cylene Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Calistoga Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Avalon Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ambit Biosciences: Consultancy; Millipore via Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Patents & Royalties; Novartis, ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. O'Brien:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Baccarani:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Mayer Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding. Nedelman:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Sequential Treatment with Rituximab and CHOP Chemotherapy in B-Cell PTLD - Moving Forward to a First Standard of Care: Results From a Prospective International Multicenter Trial.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 100-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Trappe ◽  
Sylvain Choquet ◽  
Stephan H.K. Oertel ◽  
Veronique Leblond ◽  
Daan Dierickx ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Sequential Treatment ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Abstract 100 Purpose: This trial aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sequential treatment with rituximab and CHOP-21 in patients with PTLD unresponsive to reduction of immunosuppression. Methods: An ongoing prospective, multicenter, international phase II trial was initiated in January 2003. Initially patients were treated with a fixed sequence of rituximab at days 1, 8, 15 and 22 (4R) followed by four cycles of CHOP-21 combined with G-CSF support starting 4 weeks after the last dose of rituximab (sequential treatment, ST). Based on the results of an earlier interim analysis showing that the response to rituximab predicts OS the trial was amended in 2007 introducing risk stratification according to the response to 4R (risk stratified sequential treatment, RSST). In RSST patients achieving a complete remission after 4R (low risk) continue with four 3-weekly courses of rituximab monotherapy while patients in PR, SD or PD (high risk) are followed by four cycles of R-CHOP-21 + G-CSF. Results: This is a scheduled interim analysis after inclusion of a total of 104 patients. The median follow up is 34.0 months for ST (64 pts.) and 9.1 months for RSST (40 pts.). 61 ST and 35 RSST patients were diagnosed with monomorphic PTLD, 3/5 with polymorphic PTLD. 27/23 patients were kidney, 3/0 kidney+pancreas, 15/8 liver, 13/6 heart, 6/3 lung or heart+lung transplant recipients. Median age at diagnosis of PTLD was 53/60 years (mean age: 48/56 years). 59%/58% of patients had an advanced stage of disease (Ann Arbor III/IV) and 49%/47% of tumors were EBV positive. 75%/75% of patients had late PTLD (i.e. later than 1 year after transplantation). LDH was elevated in 71%/64% of patients, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) to 4 initial courses of rituximab monotherapy (4R, N=104) was 54% with a CR-rate of 32% and the subsequent completion of treatment with CHOP or R-CHOP allowed a clear increase of the response (p<0.0001, Fig. 1). With ST the final ORR was 89% (CR rate: 69%). 86%, 75% and 75% of patients were without disease progression at one, two and three years, respectively (Fig. 2a). Disease free survival was 87%, 78% and 70% at one, two and three years. There were 6 early treatment associated deaths (9%) resulting from infections (1 from CMV-colitis, 1 from PcP-pneumonia, 1 from fulminant hepatitis, 3 from sepsis) and 2/64 patients died from refractory PTLD. Two further patients died due to hemorrhage during treatment. With RSST the ORR was 90% and 73% achieved a complete remission. 90% of patients were without disease progression at one year (Fig. 2a). There was one early treatment related death due to infection (2.5%). This patient died from sepsis secondary to intestinal perforation in response to R-CHOP treatment. 2/40 patients died from refractory PTLD. With 1 event in 16 patients in both, the ST and the RSST-arms, subsequent consolidation with rituximab monotherapy (RSST) seems not to be inferior to consolidation with 4 cycles of CHOP (ST) in patients with a CR after 4R. Up to now there is no difference in toxicity between CHOP and R-CHOP in ST/RSST. Patients failing to achieve a complete remission with 4R (72 patients) seem to benefit from the subsequent escalation from CHOP to R-CHOP (Fig. 2b). Conclusions: This is the largest prospective study in PTLD. Sequential treatment with rituximab and CHOP-21 + G-CSF is well tolerated and highly effective with a treatment related mortality of less than 10% and an efficacy of up to 90%. In comparison to historic series of rituximab monotherapy, significantly more patients achieve a CR with sequential treatment and time to progression (TTP) is very much prolonged. In comparison to historic series of CHOP, sequential treatment is much better tolerated. This may result from a lower tumor burden and a better patient fitness at the time chemotherapy is applied. Introduction of risk stratification according to the response to 4 courses of rituximab monotherapy might further improve these results restricting chemotherapy related toxicity to high risk patients while these data suggest that low risk patients can effectively be treated with extended rituximab monotherapy. Thus, risk stratified sequential treatment (RSST) might further improve OS in this difficult to treat disease. Disclosures: Trappe: Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN GmbH: Research Funding. Choquet:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oertel:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leblond:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ekman:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Honoraria. Dührsen:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Salles:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Morschhauser:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Honoraria. Riess:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN GmBH: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Bosutinib and Imatinib in Older Versus Younger Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia–BELA Trial

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4442-4442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽  
Tim H Brümmendorf ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Irina Dyagil ◽  
Hagop M Kantarjian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4442 Bosutinib (BOS) is an orally active, dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor with activity and manageable toxicity in the phase 3 BELA trial of patients (pts) with newly diagnosed (≤6 mo) chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The current analysis of the BELA trial summarizes the activity and tolerability of BOS 500 mg/d and imatinib (IM) 400 mg/d among older (≥65 y; BOS n = 30; IM n = 27) versus younger pts (<65 y; BOS n = 220; IM n = 225). Sokal risk scores were balanced between treatment arms but, as expected, higher among older pts (4% low; 72% intermediate; 25% high) versus younger pts (39% low; 44% intermediate; 17% high). Minimum follow-up duration was 24 mo. BOS was discontinued by 37% of pts (57% older vs 35% younger; P = 0.023); difference between age groups was primarily due to adverse events (AEs; 39% vs 22%; most commonly increased alanine aminotransferase [ALT]). IM was discontinued by 27% of pts (35% older vs 28% younger; P= 0.496); disease progression was the primary reason. In the intent-to-treat population, cumulative rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 24 mo in older/younger pts was 70%/80% on BOS and 78%/80% on IM. Median time to CCyR was 24.0 wk for older versus 12.7 wk for younger pts on BOS and 24.4 wk versus 24.7 wk on IM; in younger pts CCyR was achieved significantly faster on BOS versus IM (P<0.001). Among older/younger pts with a CCyR, 57%/79% on BOS and 76%/85% on IM were still on treatment and retained their CCyR as of the data cutoff. Cumulative rates of major molecular response (MMR) by 24 mo in older/younger pts were 53%/60% on BOS and 48%/49% on IM. Median time to MMR was 48.1 wk for older versus 48.0 wk for younger pts on BOS and 60.6 wk versus 84.1 wks on IM; for younger pts MMR was achieved significantly faster on BOS versus IM (P<0.001). Among older/younger pts with a MMR, 63%/84% on BOS and 92%/89% on IM were still on treatment and retained their MMR as of the data cutoff. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival in older/younger pts at 2 y was 100%/91% on BOS and 81%/88% on IM. Kaplan-Meier on-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase CML by 2 y was 0% for older and 2% (4 transformations) for younger pts on BOS (4 total), and 9% (2 transformations) for older and 5% (11 transformations) for younger pts on IM (13 total). Kaplan-Meier overall survival in older/younger pts at 2 y was 100%/97% on BOS and 92%/95% on IM. The majority of deaths were due to disease progression (BOS, n = 6; IM, n = 10); few deaths due to AEs on BOS (n = 1) or IM (n = 2) were reported, none treatment related. BOS was associated with higher rates of gastrointestinal TEAEs, elevated ALT and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and pyrexia; IM was associated with higher rates of musculoskeletal TEAEs and edema (Table). Rates of common TEAEs were generally similar or higher among older pts. Pleural/pericardial effusion occurred in 6 (21%) older pts (3/6 with treatment-related events; median event duration, 36.5 d) versus 5 (2%) younger pts (all with treatment-related events) on BOS, and in no IM pts. Overall grade 3/4 TEAEs were more frequent among older pts on both BOS and IM, as was dose modification (Table). Grade 3/4 lab abnormalities of elevated ALT (BOS, 18% older/24% younger; IM, 4% each) and AST (BOS, 7%/12%; IM, 4% each) were more frequent with BOS versus IM, but similar between age groups. Grade 3/4 lab abnormalities of neutropenia were more frequent with IM (23% older/22% younger) versus BOS (11% each) regardless of age; grade 3/4 anemia (6%-14%) and thrombocytopenia (14%-23%) were generally similar regardless of age or treatment arm. In conclusion, BOS demonstrated activity in both older and younger pts with newly diagnosed CP CML. Although the frequency of certain toxicities as well as treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs was higher among older pts, the toxicity profile of BOS remained manageable and distinct from that of IM regardless of age. Event, % BOS IM ≥65 y (n = 28) <65 y (n = 220) ≥65 y (n = 26) <65 y (n = 225) Non-hematologic TEAEsa     Diarrhea 86 68 46 22     Rash 36 22 27 18     Nausea 36 32 31 37     Vomiting 32 32 19 15     Dyspnea 32 5 12 3     Pyrexia 29 17 4 13     Elevated ALT 29 32 15 8     Elevated AST 25 27 15 8     Elevated lipase 25 12 19 10     Headache 21 12 8 12     Asthenia 21 5 4 7     Dyspepsia 14 6 23 5     Muscle spasms 14 3 35 21     Periorbital edema 7 <1 35 12 Any grade 3/4 TEAE 89 65 73 56 Dose reduction due to AE 64 40 42 18 Dose interruption due to AE 89 63 69 42 Treatment discontinuation due to AE 39 22 8 9 All treated pts were included in the safety analyses. a Includes TEAEs reported for ≥20% of older or younger pts. Disclosures: Gambacorti-Passerini: Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis, Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy. Brümmendorf:Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination: Patents & Royalties. Kim:BMS, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Pavlov:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gogat:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Duvillie:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Shapiro:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cortes:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Ariad, Chemgenex: Consultancy, Research Funding.

The Rate of Individual BCR-ABL Decline As an Optimized Predictor of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Treatment Outcome in Chronic Phase CML Patients, Comparison with CML Prognostic Scores and Early Molecular Response Achievement

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5150-5150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Fominykh ◽  
Vasily Shuvaev ◽  
Irina Martynkevich ◽  
Grigory Tsaur ◽  
Natalya Bederak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Prognostic Scores ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Optimal Response ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background. About 70% of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients achieve early molecular response (BCR-ABLIS2 10% at 3-months) that lead to 5-years overall survival close to 95%. However, CML patients remain heterogeneous group and several studies in recent years were aimed to personalize treatment based on individual patients' characteristics. Our group previously put forward a hypothesis about the prognostic value of individual BCR-ABL declinerate in the first three months of CML therapy1,2. The ratio BCR-ABL at 3 months to baseline had chosen as 0.1 as best cut-off value to predict MMR at 12 months. The aims of this study were to validate our prognostic method in larger group of patients and compare these results according to CML prognostic scores. Patients and methods. Fifty-five patients (median age, 52 years; range 19-84; 24 male and 31 female) with chronic phase CML were included in the study. Patients' distribution for Sokal risk groups were as follows: low-30 / intermediate-15 / high-10. Six patients had EUTOS high-risk. Forty-two patients started treatment with Imatinib 400 mg/day, 12 patients started with Nilotinib 600 mg/day and 1 patient started with Dasatinib 100 mg/day. Median BCR-ABL transcript levels was 41.38% at diagnosis, range 3.39-3185.36% (IS). The ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to baseline for each patient was calculated. In addition, we calculated ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to BCR-ABL levels at 1 month for 13 patients. Comparison was made of the predictive sensitivity to achieve early molecular response at 3 months (10% by IS) and according to prognostic CML scores (Sokal and EUTOS). We also assessed positive likelihood ratio (LR) value for the probability of achieving MMR between patients' stratification methods. Statistical analysis was conducted with Fisher exact test and sensitivity-specificity analyses. Results. Twenty-six out of 34 patients (76.5%) with ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to baseline below than 0.1 achieved MMR at 12 months, while only 9 of 21 patients (42.9%) with ratio more than 0.1 had optimal response (LR = 1.86 (1.05 - 3.29); p=0.003). Ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to 1 month showed much better results with the same (0.1) cut-off value - 5 out of 6 patients (83.3%) with ratio BCR-ABL at 3 months to 1 month below than 0.1, while only 1 patient (14.3%) with ratio more than 0.1 achieved optimal response (LR = 5.83 (0.92 - 37.08); p=0.05), respectively. Application of early molecular response at 3 months (10% by IS) yielded worse discrimination results: 34 of 47 (72.3%) patients with BCR-ABL level ²10% at 3 months, whereas 2 of 8 (25%) patients with BCR-ABL >10% had MMR at 1 year (LR = 1.38 (1.01 - 1.89); p=0.78), respectively. CML prognostic scores results had the following sensitivity-specificity results: for Sokal - low-risk 23 of 30 (76.7%), intermediate-risk 9 of 15 (60%) and 3 of 10 (30%) high-risk patients achieved MMR at 1 year (LR (low+intermediate)/high = 1.41 (1.00 - 1.97); p=0.03); for EUTOS-score - low-risk 34 of 49 (69.4%) and only 1 of 6 (16.7%) high-risk patients had achieved MMR at 12 months (LR = 1.30 (1.00 - 1.68); p=0.02). Furthermore, application of our ratio cut-off value among patients with BCR-ABL level ²10% at 3 months allowed us to revealed additional 6 high-risk patients have not reached MMR at 1 year of therapy (Table 1). Conclusion. Our study showed that individual rates of BCR-ABL decline from baseline to 3 months and to 1 month had better LR than CML prognostic scores (Sokal, EUTOS) or early molecular response achievement (BCR-ABL levels ²10% at 3 months) and might be useful as an optimized predictors of outcome for CML patients (MMR at 1 year of treatment). 1 Fominykh M., ShuvaevV., Martynkevich I. et al. ELN Frontiers Meeting ÇWhere science meets clinical practiceÈ 16-19 October, 2014, Berlin, Germany. Abstract book: 11. 2 Shuvaev V., Fominykh M., Martynkevich I. et al. Blood (56th ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), 2014; 124 (21): 5529. Figure 1. The patient numbers of achieving MMR at 12 months of therapy in various stratification groups with sensitivity-specificity characteristics Figure 1. The patient numbers of achieving MMR at 12 months of therapy in various stratification groups with sensitivity-specificity characteristics Disclosures Chelysheva: Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Turkina:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis Pharma: Consultancy.

Validation of the Inhospital Mortality for Pulmonary Embolism Using Claims Data (IMPACT) Prediction Rule within an All-Payer Inpatient Administrative Claims Database

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 747-747
Author(s):  
Craig I Coleman ◽  
Christine G Kohn ◽  
Concetta Crivera ◽  
Jeff Schein ◽  
W Frank Peacock
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prediction Rule ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Claims Database ◽  
Impact Prediction ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background: Current guidelines suggest that low risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients may be managed as outpatients or with an abbreviated hospital stay. There is need for a claims-based prediction rule that payers and hospitals can use to efficiently risk stratify PE patients. The authors recently derived a rule found to have high sensitivity and moderate specificity for predicting in-hospital mortality. Objective: To validate the In-hospital Mortality for PulmonAry embolism using Claims daTa (IMPACT) prediction rule originally developed in a commercial claims database in an all-payer administrative database restricted to inpatient claims. Methods: This study utilized data from the 2012 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Adult PE admissions were identified by the presence of an appropriate International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code either in the primary position or secondary position when accompanied by a primary code for a PE complication. The IMPACT rule, consists of age + 11 weighted comorbidities calculated based upon the maximum of 25 ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes and 25 procedural codes reported for each discharge in the NIS (myocardial infarction, chronic lung disease, stroke, prior major bleeding, atrial fibrillation, cognitive impairment, heart failure, renal failure, liver disease, coagulopathy, cancer), and was used to estimate patients' risk of in-hospital mortality. Low risk was defined as in-hospital mortality ≤1.5%. We present the validity of the rule by calculating prognostic test characteristics and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In order to estimate the potential cost savings from an early discharge, we calculated the difference in total hospital costs between low-risk patients having and not having an abbreviated hospital stay (defined as ≤1, ≤2 or ≤3 days). Results: A total of 34,108 admissions for PE were included (46.7% male, mean ± standard deviation age of 61.9±17.2); and we observed a 3.4% in-hospital PE case-fatality rate. The IMPACT prediction rule classified 11,025 (32.3%) patient admissions as low-risk; and had a sensitivity of 92.4% (95%CI=90.7-93.8), specificity of 33.2% (95%CI=32.7-33.7), negative and positive predictive values of 99.2% (95%CI=99.0-99.4) and 4.6% (95%CI=4.4-4.9) and a C-statistic of 0.74 (95%CI=0.73-0.76) for in-hospital mortality. Low-risk patients had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (0.8% vs. 4.6%, odds reduction of 83%; 95%CI=79-87), shorter LOSs (-1.2 days, p<0.001) and lower total treatment costs (-$3,074, p<0.001) than patients classified as higher-risk. Of low-risk patients, 13.1%, 31.1% and 47.7% were discharged within 1, 2 and 3 days of admission. Low-risk patients discharged within 1 day accrued $5,465 (95%CI=$5,018-$5,911) less in treatment costs than those staying longer. Discharge within 2 or 3 days in low-risk patients was also associated with a reduced cost of hospital treatment [$5,820 (95%CI=$5,506-$6,133) and $6,314 (95%CI=$6,031-$6,597), respectively] when compared to those staying longer. Conclusion: The prior claims-based in-hospital mortality prediction rule was valid when used in this all-payer, inpatient only administrative claims database. The rule classified patients' mortality risk with high sensitivity and had a high negative predictive value; and consequently, may be valuable to those wishing to benchmark rates of PE treated at home or following an abbreviated hospital admission. Disclosures Coleman: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Research Funding. Crivera:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schein:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment. Peacock:Singulex: Consultancy; Prevencio: Consultancy; The Medicines Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cardiorentis: Research Funding; Banyan: Research Funding; Alere: Research Funding; Abbott: Research Funding; Comprehensive Research Associates, LLC: Equity Ownership; Emergencies in Medicine, LLC: Equity Ownership.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document