Monosomal Karyotype Predicts Adverse Prognosis In Patients With Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Background Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematologic disorder that was classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a myelodysplastic/ myeloproliferative overlap disease. Cytogenetic abnormalities have a significant prognostic role in many hematologic neoplasms, but their prognostic value in CMML has been debatable. Recently, monosomal karyotype (MK) has been reported to be a marker of poor prognosis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and primary myelofibrosis, but its value in CMML is unknown. Aim To study MK effect on clinical outcome for patients diagnosed with CMML Method A retrospective study of all cases diagnosed with CMML at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1994 to 2011 was performed. Only pts with complete cytogenetic analysis at presentation to our institution were included. MK was defined as the presence of ≥ 2 autosomal monosomies or one autosomal monosomy with at least one structural abnormality (Breems et al, JCO 2008). CK was defined as the presence of at least 3 chromosomal abnormalities. Appropriate IRB approval was obtained in accordance with Helsinki declaration. Comparison between groups’ medians was done using Wilcoxon test, while survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves using JMP V9. Results A total of 262 pts diagnosed with CMML had available cytogenetic data at diagnosis. Median age was 72 years, 176 (67%) were male. Median hemoglobin 10.5 g/dL, white blood cells (wbc) 12 x109/L, platelet 89 x109/L, peripheral blood (PB) blast 0, and bone marrow (BM) blast 4%. CMML2 was seen in 9% while 47% were proliferative (wbc >13). Leukemic transformation was documented in 34 pts (13%). Median overall survival was 513 days. Cytogenetic (CG) analysis was diploid in 167 pts (64%). Trisomy 8 was the most frequent cytogenetic abnormality at 8% (22), followed by complex karyotype (CK) 5% (14), then -7 at 4% (10) and MK 3% (7, six of which were also CK). Comparing pts with diploid CG to other categories indicates: to abnormal CG pts had lower wbc (0.001), PB blasts (p<0.0001), and BM blasts (p=0.0001); to CK pts had lower PB blasts (p=0.003) and higher platelets (p=0.03); to -7 pts had lower wbc (p=0.005), PB blast (p=0.0004), BM blasts (p=0.03) and higher platelets (p=0.03); to +8 pts had lower PB blast (p=0.02) and BM blasts (p= 0.01); no difference was noted when compared to MK. Median OS was statistically significantly worse in MK+ vs MK- (24 vs 527 days, p= 0.002), but not in other comparisons: -7 vs others (250 vs 527 days, p=0.2), CK+ vs CK- (256 vs 527 days, p=0.05), diploid vs others (570 vs 365 days, p=0.1), +8 vs others (312 vs 527 days, p=0.1). Pts with MK+ only or MK+CK+ did worse than CK+ only or other groups (4, 63, 304, 527 days, respectively, p<0.0001). On a multivariate analysis, MK+ (in addition to platelet, BM blast, hemoglobin, and wbc) did have an impact on OS (p=0.0004), while CK+, -7, +8, diploid CG, age, PB blast did not. Conclusion Cytogenetic abnormalities were not frequent findings in pts diagnosed with CMML (36%), but did affect wbc, PB and BM blasts. The most common cytogenetic abnormality was +8 while MK was present at 3% (less than published data in MDS). Only MK predicted statistically significant shorter mOS between all other cytogenetic categories on both univariate and multivariate analysis. This finding needs to be validated by larger cohorts of pts due to its rare occurrence in CMML. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Molecular and Prognostic Correlates of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: A Mayo Clinic-French Consortium Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.412.412 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 412-412

Author(s):

Emnet A Wassie ◽

Raphael Itzykson ◽

Terra L Lasho ◽

Olivier Kosmider ◽

Christy Finke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mayo Clinic ◽

Risk Model ◽

Normal Karyotype ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Older Age ◽

World Health ◽

Abnormal Karyotype ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Monosomal Karyotype

Abstract Background: The prognostic significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) was recently revisited (AJH, 89; 813-818, 2014 and Blood April, 2013). Using a large Mayo Clinic-French Consortium database, we analyzed the molecular and prognostic correlates of cytogenetic abnormalities in CMML. Methods: CMML diagnosis was according to World Health Organization criteria. Cytogenetic analysis and reporting was done according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of cytogenetic studies. Results: Spectrum and frequency of cytogenetic abnormalities: A total of 409 patients participated in this study including, 268 (66%) from the Mayo Clinic and 141 (34%) from the French CMML consortium. Of these, 396 (97%) had ≥20 metaphases and 13 (3%) had ten to 19, analyzed. One hundred and fifteen (30%) patients displayed an abnormal karyotype, including 82 (71%) sole, 20 (17%) two and 13 (11%) complex abnormalities. The most common abnormalities were; +8 (23%), -Y (20%), -7/7q- (14%), 20q- (8%), +21 (8%) and der (3q) (8%). Other cytogenetic abnormalities included 5q-, 12p-, 13q- and i(17q), present at a much lower frequency (0.9-4%). Phenotypic correlates: Abnormal vs normal karyotype was associated with older age (p=0.03), hemoglobin<10 g/dL (p=0.0009), white blood cell count (WBC) >15 x 109/L (p=0.02), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >10 x 109/L (p=0.03), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) >2.5 x109/L ( p=0.04), peripheral blood (PB) blast ≥1% (p<0.0001), bone marrow (BM) blast ≥10% (p<0.0001) and circulating immature myeloid cells (IMC) (p=0.0003). +8 (p=0.01), +21 (p=0.03) and der (3q) (p=0.03) were associated with hemoglobin <10 g/dL. -Y was associated with older age (p=0.04), lower PB (p=0.04) and BM (p=0.02) blasts. -7/7q was associated with leukocytosis (p=0.005), neutrophilia (p=0.04), and higher PB blasts (p=0.004). 20q- was associated with thrombocytopenia (p=0.04). Molecular correlates: ASXL1 mutations were associated with abnormal karyotype (p=0.04) and SRSF2 with normal karyotype (p=0.02). In comparison to other abnormal karyotypes, the incidence of ASXL1 mutations was lower in –Y (P=0.04) and der(3q) (p=0.03). U2AF1 mutations were associated with monosomal karyotype (p=0.03) and SF3B1 with der (3q) (p<0.0001). Prognostic relevance : Median follow-up was 1.8 years with 244 (60%) deaths and 79 leukemic transformations (19%). A step-wise survival analysis resulted in three distinct cytogenetic risk categories (Figure 1): high (complex and monosomal karyotype), intermediate (all abnormalities not in high or low risk) and low (normal, sole -Y and sole der (3q)); the corresponding median survivals were 0.2 (HR 8.1, 95% CI 4.6-14.2), 1.7 (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.3). In multivariable analysis, the particular cytogenetic risk stratification remained significant in the context of Mayo molecular model (p<0.0001), MDAPS (p<0.0001), and the GFM risk model (P<0.0001). The Mayo-French cytogenetic risk model was also effective in predicting leukemic transformation with HR of 10.9 (95% CI 4.2-27.8) for high and 2.2 (95% CI 1.3-3.7) for intermediate risk groups. Conclusion: Cytogenetic abnormalities are seen in approximately 30% of patients with CMML and display significant associations with certain molecular and phenotypic characteristics. We describe a novel cytogenetic prognostic model for both over-all and leukemia free survival in CMML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Hematology ◽

10.1182/asheducation-2011.1.264 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 2011 (1) ◽

pp. 264-272 ◽

Cited By ~ 29

Author(s):

Mario Cazzola ◽

Luca Malcovati ◽

Rosangela Invernizzi

Keyword(s):

Clinical Laboratory ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

World Health ◽

Refractory Anemia ◽

Molecular Diagnostic ◽

Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Lymphoid Tissues ◽

Ring Sideroblasts ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms are clonal myeloid neoplasms that have some clinical, laboratory, or morphologic findings that support a diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome, and other findings that are more consistent with myeloproliferative neoplasms. These disorders include chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (BCR-ABL1 negative), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, unclassifiable. The best characterized of these latter unclassifiable conditions is the provisional entity defined as refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts associated with marked thrombocytosis. This article focuses on myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms of adulthood, with particular emphasis on chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts associated with marked thrombocytosis. Recent studies have partly clarified the molecular basis of these disorders, laying the groundwork for the development of molecular diagnostic and prognostic tools. It is hoped that these advances will soon translate into improved therapeutic approaches.

Download Full-text

Cytogenetic and Molecular Profile Analysis in Hispanic Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Patients From Puerto Rico

American Journal of Clinical Pathology ◽

10.1093/ajcp/aqz121.005 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 152 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S106-S106

Author(s):

Nawar Matti ◽

Ruifang Zheng ◽

Khalid Algarrahi ◽

Albert Alhatem ◽

Xinlai Sun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Puerto Rico ◽

Incidence Rate ◽

Lower Incidence ◽

Patient Population ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Wild Type ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Molecular Profiles ◽

Lower Incidence Rate ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Objectives Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic malignancy with both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features. The clinical and pathological features of CMML are highly heterogeneous. It was reported that Hispanic whites had an age-adjusted lower incidence rate of CMML compared to non-Hispanic whites. The aim of this study is to define the cytogenetic and genomic landscape of Hispanic CMML patients and explore their potential clinical significance. Methods Clinically relevant cytogenetic results and 40-gene molecular profiles of Hispanic CMML patients in Puerto Rico (PR) from 2009 to 2018 were obtained retrospectively. Results Total 111 Hispanic CMML patients from PR were diagnosed in our institute from 2009 to 2018. The age range was from 46 to 96 years with a median age of 74. Sixty-five were male and 46 were female. The epidemiological features are similar to that in a general CMML patient population. In total, 107 patients had karyotypes available; 17 patients had abnormal karyotype (17/107, ~16%). Compared with general CMML patients, Hispanic CMML patients had a significantly lower rate of cytogenetic abnormalities (30% vs 16%). Among total 111 Hispanic CMML patients, 40-gene myeloid molecular profiles were performed in 56 CMML patients. Fifty-five out of 56 patients had mutations identified (~98.2%). The most frequent mutated genes were TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1, NRAS, and ZRSR2. Twenty-six of 56 patients (~46.4%) had mutated TET2/wild-type ASXL1. Previous studies indicated that mutated ASXL1, NRAS, RUNX1, and SETBP1 likely associate with an unfavorable prognosis in a general CMML patient population. Mutated TET2 with wild-type ASXL1 (muTET2/wtASXL1) may associate with a favorable prognosis. Compared with general CMML patients, Hispanic CMML patients in this study had relatively lower mutational rates in ASXL1 (30.4% vs 37.0%), NRAS (10.7% vs 11.7%), RUNX1 (5.3% vs 7.9%), and SETBP1 (5.3% vs 8.9%) and a higher rate of muTET2/wtASXL1 (46.4% vs 37.8%). Conclusion Hispanic CMML patients from PR had a significantly lower rate in cytogenetic abnormalities; relatively lower mutational rates in ASXL1, NRAS, RUNX1, and SETBP1; and a higher mutational rate in muTET2/wtASXL1. The findings raise a possibility of a better prognosis in Hispanic CMML patients and could be one of the explanations of a lower incidence rate of CMML in Hispanic population.

Download Full-text

MicroRNA Expression Profiles in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.2699.2699 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 2699-2699

Author(s):

Mehdi Nassiri ◽

Joseph Olczyk ◽

Samantha Knapp ◽

Gail Vance ◽

Anupama Tewari ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Mirna Expression ◽

Expression Profiles ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Differentially Expressed ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Normal Bone ◽

Normal Reference ◽

Mirna Expression Profiles ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a hematopoietic malignancy with hybrid myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic features. The diagnostic criteria for CMML are evolving with the progress of our knowledge on various genetic lesions involved in the pathogenesis of myeloid neoplasms. This shift, including molecular genetic lesions in the diagnosis process, is highlighted in updated 2008 WHO classification system, which excludes myeloproliferative neoplasms with PDGFRB rearrangement, monocytosis and eosinophilia from CMML category. Despite these recent advancements, CMML remains a heterogeneous group of diseases with variable patient outcomes and no well-defined targeted therapy. To further investigate the biological diversity of this disorder, we studied microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles, their relation to the diagnostic and clinical parameters in CMML, and compared these profiles to global miRNA expression in normal reference bone marrow samples. MicroRNAs are a class of non-coding RNA molecules that alter gene expression by targeting and blocking mRNA. The role of miRNAs in carcinogenesis is related to their targeting of messenger RNAs encoding for oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Bone marrow samples from 22 patients with CMML were included in the study. Median age of the patients was 71 years with a range from 39 to 92 years. There were 15 males and 7 females. Seventeen patients presented with CMML-1 (blasts less than 5% in peripheral blood and less than 10% of bone marrow differential count). The remaining patients showed CMML-2. Nine patients had WBC below 13×109/L defining a myelodysplastic type of CMML. Cytogenetic results were available in 20 patients. Fourteen patients demonstrated a normal karyotype. Normal pooled bone marrow samples were used as a reference. The total RNA was isolated using RecoverAll RNA extraction kit. Micoroarray studies were performed using Agilent human miRNA microarrays (version 1.0) containing probes for 470 human and 64 human viral miRNAs cataloged in the Sanger database v9.1. The results were analyzed using BRB array tool and Genesis software. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering discovered two different groups of CMML samples with patterns of miRNA expression distinct from normal bone marrows (oneway ANOVA). Twenty seven miRNAs were differentially expressed in normal bone marrow reference samples vs. CMML-1 and -2. There was an overlap in miRNA profiles between groups of CMML based on blast percentage (CMML-1 vs. CMML-2), WBC count (<13×109/L vs. ≥13×109/L) and presence or absence of cytogenetic abnormalities. However, using PAM algorithm the following miRNAs showed predictive power: hsa-miR-519b (in CMML-1 vs. 2); hsa-miR-15b and hsa-miR-432* (in groups of samples separated by a cut-off WBC of 13×109/L) and hsa-miR-223 (comparing CMML with and without cytogenetic abnormalities). In summary, significantly different miRNA profiles were seen in CMML as compared to normal reference bone marrow. Two distinct subgroups of CMML were defined by the miRNA expression profiles. Select miRNAs were differentially expressed in known biological and clinical subgroups of CMML. Further correlation of clinical and outcome data with subgroups of CMML defined by miRNA expression profiles will be presented.

Download Full-text

Spliceosome Mutations Involving SRSF2, SF3B1 and U2AF35 in World Health Organization Defined Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia; Prevalence, Clinical Correlates and Prognosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1711.1711 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1711-1711

Author(s):

Mrinal M. Patnaik ◽

Terra L Lasho ◽

Christy Finke ◽

Curtis A Hanson ◽

Janice M Hodnefield ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Low Risk ◽

World Health ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Free Survival ◽

Clinical Correlates ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Abstract 1711 Background: Mutations in genes of the splicing machinery, such as SF3B1, SRSF2 and U2AF35 are common in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes [MDS] (Nature 2011;478:64) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [CMML] (Haematologica 2012;Epub). In MDS, SRSF2 gene mutations are an independent risk factor for shortened over-all (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) (Blood 2012;119:3578). In MDS with ring sideroblasts (RS), SF3B1 mutations have a high prevalence (∼50%), but do not influence either, the OS or the LFS (Blood 2012;119:569). We carried out this study to evaluate the prevalence, clinical correlates and prognosis of the aforementioned spliceosome mutations in CMML. Methods: The study included 227 patients with WHO defined CMML who were seen at the Mayo Clinic from 1997 through 2007. All patients underwent bone marrow (BM) examination and cytogenetic evaluation at diagnosis. DNA was interrogated in the three most frequent spliceosome genes with somatic mutations; SRSF2, SF3B1 and U2AF35. Results I: Prevalence and clinical correlates Among the 227 study patients, 153 (67%) were male, median age was 71 years (range, 17–90 years) and 192 (85%) met the WHO criteria for CMML-1. Ninety (40%) patients had SRSF2 mutations (86% CMML-1), 13 (6%) had SF3B1 mutations (75% CMML-1) and 20 (9%) had U2AF35 mutations (95% CMML-1). One-hundred and twenty three (54%) patients had at least one of three spliceosome mutations (86% CMML-1). Mutational hot spots were P95 for SRSF2 (P95L-n=36/H-n=32/R-n=13/A-n=1), K700E (n=7) and H662Q (n=2) for SF3B1, and Q157 (Q157R-n=5/P-n=5/G-n=1) and S34F (n=7) for U2AF35. Seven patients (54%) with SF3B1 mutations had ≥1% RS, with 5 (38%) showing ≥15% RS. Mutations involving all three spliceosome genes were mutually exclusive. The cytogenetic distribution based on the Spanish risk stratification system (Haematologica 2011;96:375) was; SRSF2 mutations: 69 (77%) low risk, 11 (12%) intermediate risk, and 10 (11%) high risk (+8-n=3, del/monosomy 7-n=2, monosomal karyotype-n=5); SF3B1 mutations: 8 (62%) low risk and 5 (38%) intermediate risk; U2AF35 mutations: 15 (75%) low risk, 3 (15%) intermediate risk and 2 (10%) high risk (p=0.89). The distribution of mutations according to the MD Anderson prognostic scoring system [MDAPS] (Blood 2002;99:840) was; SRSF2 - low-n=41, intermediate-1-n=26, intermediate-2-n=18, high-n=5, SF3B1- low-n=7, intermediate-1-n=3, intermediate-2-n=2, high-n=1, and U2AF35- low-n=11, intermediate-1-n=5, intermediate-2-n=3, high-n=1 (p=0.73). There was no statistically significant difference, among the three mutation groups, in prognostically relevant parameters, including gender distribution, median age, hemoglobin values, platelet counts, peripheral blood (PB) and BM blast counts, absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) and absolute monocyte counts (AMC). The only notable difference was that patients with the SF3B1 mutation had a lower median white blood cell count (p=0.04) and a lower absolute lymphocyte count (p=0.045). Results II: Prognostic impact of spliceosome mutations At a median follow-up of 15 months, 166 (73%) deaths and 33 (14.5%) leukemic transformations were documented. Median survivals for patients with mutations involving SRSF2, SF3B1 and U2AF35 were 24, 17 and 12 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, the presence of SRSF2 (p=0.67), SF3B1 (p=0.96) or U2AF35 (p=0.49) mutations had no prognostic impact on OS. Similarly, none of the three spliceosome mutations affected LFS; corresponding p values were 0.55 for SRSF2, 0.9 for SF3B1 and 0.38 for U2AF35 mutations respectively. We then examined possible prognostic value of having none of these mutations (n=104) vs otherwise (n=123) and the results were once again negative (p=0.87). Conclusions: SRSF2 is the most frequently mutated spliceosome gene in CMML, but neither it nor SF3B1 or U2AF35 mutations affect overall or leukemia-free survival in CMML. Furthermore, the current study suggests limited genotype-phenotype association, save for the already established association between SF3B1 mutations and RS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Short Survival and High Rates of Transformation Prevail in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Despite Hypomethylating Agent Therapy.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2800.2800 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2800-2800

Author(s):

Emily J. Vannorsdall ◽

Vu H. Duong ◽

Xinyi Ng ◽

Dan P. Zandberg ◽

Michael L. Tidwell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

World Health ◽

Free Survival ◽

Entire Cohort ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Abstract 2800 Background: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder categorized as a mixed myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic disorder in the World Health Organization classification system. Diagnostic criteria include a persistent peripheral blood monocytosis >1 × 109/L and bone marrow dysplasia. Our recent review of SEER Medicare data (ASH 2011 abstract 2784) demonstrated that CMML has a shorter overall survival (OS) and more frequent progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), compared to myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Due to the heterogeneity of this disease and its differences from MDS, efforts to identify prognostic factors have been ongoing. The MD Anderson prognostic score was previously validated, but was derived from patients treated prior to the availability of the hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacitidine and decitabine. HMAs have now emerged as standard therapy, with reported response rates of 37–69%, but their impact on survival and AML transformation is unclear. The OS of CMML patients has been reported at 12–18 months and transformation rates have varied between 15–52%. We reviewed our own single-center experience with CMML over the past 12 years. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of CMML patients evaluated at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center between January 2000 and August 2012. Patient and disease characteristics, treatments, complications, progression to AML, and OS were recorded and analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for all time-to-event data. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0. Results: We identified 35 patients with CMML, 71% were male and 71% white, with a median age of 69 (range 34–86) years; 75% had <10% bone marrow (BM) blasts and 68% had low-risk cytogenetic findings (normal karyotype or -Y). Most patients treated prior to 2005 received hydroxyurea and/or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or were enrolled on clinical trials, while patients treated since 2005 received HMAs as primary therapy. The median OS of the entire cohort was 19.5 months, with 49% of patients progressing to AML with a median time to progression (TTP) of 16.9 months. Of the entire cohort, patients with <10% and ≥10% BM blasts had an estimated OS of 19.4 and 11.7 months respectively (p=.021). Patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk (complex karyotype, +8, or chromosome 7 abnormalities) cytogenetic findings had an estimated OS of 23.3, 16.5, and 12.0 months respectively (p<0.001). Twenty-two patients received HMAs. Their estimated OS was 16.5 months, compared to 23.0 months for patients who did not receive HMAs (p =.683); 50% of patients treated with HMAs had known progression to AML, with TTP varying from 3–28 months. AML-free-survival was 16 months in patients receiving HMAs, compared to 14 months in patients not treated with HMAs (p=0.960). The majority of patients receiving HMA therapy (63%) were treated with ≥ 6 cycles; 57% of these patients transformed to AML despite initial response, often in a sudden and unpredictable manner. Conclusions: Published trials using HMAs in CMML have been limited by small patient numbers, short median follow-up, and paucity of data on AML transformation. Our study had a median follow-up period of 41.1 months. We found a high rate of AML transformation and short OS even in patients who received HMAs. HMA treatment had no statistically significant impact on AML-free survival or OS. Although the results may be confounded by some selection bias, treatment with HMAs was largely based on the date of diagnosis rather than prognostic variables or performance status. Therefore, the favorable response rates previously reported with these agents, and also seen in our patients, do not appear to translate into an OS or AML-free-survival advantage. Our study underscores the continued need for novel agents and the need to prioritize clinical trials for this group of patients. Additionally, based on our data, early bone marrow transplantation should be strongly considered for CMML patients when feasible. Disclosures: Davidoff: Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; GlaskoSmithKline: Research Funding. Baer:Novartis, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

"Proliferative" Versus "Dysplastic" Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: Molecular and Prognostic Correlates

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1987.1987 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1987-1987

Author(s):

Mrinal M Patnaik ◽

Terra L. Lasho ◽

Christy Finke ◽

Matthew T Howard ◽

Curtis A. Hanson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Leukocyte Count ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Hemoglobin Level ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

World Health ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Apparent Difference ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Proliferative Cmml

Abstract Background : The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms has recommended distinction between "proliferative" (WBC ≥ 13 x 10(9)/L) and "dysplastic" (WBC < 13 X 10(9)/L) subtypes of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). In the current study of 261 molecularly-annotated cases, we sought to clarify the prognostic relevance of distinguishing proliferative from dysplastic CMML and also describe differences in the distribution of disease-associated mutations. Methods : 261 patients with WHO-defined CMML were included in the study. All patients had bone marrow (BM) biopsies and cytogenetics performed at diagnosis. Targeted capture assays were carried out on BM DNA specimens obtained at diagnosis for the following genes; TET2, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, ASXL1, EZH2, SUZ12, SRSF2, SF3B1, ZRSR2, U2AF1, PTPN11, Tp53, SH2B3, RUNX1, CBL, NRAS, KRAS, JAK2, CSF3R, FLT3, KIT, CALR, MPL, NPM1, CEBPA, IKZF, and SETBP. The 2016 WHO criteria were used to sub-classify CMML into proliferative and dysplastic subtypes. Results :Among the 261 study patients, 65% were males and median age was 70 years. 154 (59%), 64 (25%) and 43 (16%) patients were classified as CMML-0, 1 and 2, respectively. At a median follow-up of 23 months, 174 (67%) deaths and 37 (14%) leukemic transformations were documented. Mutational frequencies were; TET2 45%, ASXL1 45%, SRSF2 40%, NRAS 14%, SETBP1 13%, CBL 10%, JAK2 7%, RUNX1 6%, U2AF1 6%, DNMT3A 6%, SF3B1 5%, ZRSR2 4%, Tp53 4%, IDH2 4%, KRAS 3%, PTPN11 2%, SH2B3 1%, CSF3R 1%, IDH1 1%, EZH2 1%, SUZ12 1%, KIT 1%, FLT3 1%, and CALR 1%. Risk stratification was based on the Mayo Molecular Model: 31% high, 30% intermediate-1, 28% intermediate-2 and 11 % low risk. i) Dysplastic versus proliferative CMML: phenotypic and molecular differences 139 (53%) patients had proliferative and 122 (47%) dysplastic subtypes. There was no difference between the CMML subtypes in terms of age and gender distribution, hemoglobin level, platelet count or BM blast content. Patients with proliferative CMML had higher absolute monocyte counts (AMC) (p<0.0001), circulating immature myeloid cells (IMC, p<0.001), circulating blasts (p<0.001) and serum LDH levels (p=0.01). The following gene mutations were more common in proliferative vs dysplastic CMML: ASXL1 (54% vs 37%, p=0.009), JAK2 (11% vs 3%, p=0.01) and CBL (11% vs 8%, p=0.047); SF3B1 mutations were more common in dysplastic CMML (8% vs 1%, p=0.02). There was no difference in the incidence of TET2, DNMT3A and SRSF2 mutations whereas there was a trend towards a higher prevalence of NRAS (p=0.06) and CSF3R (p=0.06) mutations in proliferative CMML. Cytogenetic abnormalities (p=0.03), including higher risk categories by the Spanish (p=0.03) and the Mayo-French (p=0.01) systems were more common in proliferative CMML. ii) Impact on overall and leukemia-free survival: Median survival for the entire cohort (n=261) was 24 months. In univariate analysis, survival was shorter in patients with proliferative (median 20 months) versus dysplastic (median 29 months) CMML (p=0.008; HR1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1; Figure 1A). Other variables of significance, in univariate analysis, included hemoglobin (p=0.001), leukocyte count (p=0.001), AMC (p=0.003), PB blast % (p=0.003), IMC (p=0.01), BM blast % (p=0.045), abnormal karyotype (p=0.02), ASXL1 (p=0.01) and DNMT3A (p=0.0003) mutations. In multivariable analysis, the difference in survival between proliferative and dysplastic subtypes remained significant with the addition of hemoglobin level (p=0.01), PB blast % (p=0.02), IMC (p=0.04), BM blast % (p=0.01) or DNMT3A mutations (p=0.01). This was, however, not the case with addition of leukocyte count (p=0.32), AMC (p=0.18) or ASXL1 mutational status (p=0.14); whereas the adverse impact on survival from the latter three parameters remained significant. The prognostic impact of ASXL1 mutations was most apparent in dysplastic CMML (Figure 1B). There was no difference in leukemic transformation rates (p=0.4). Conclusions: In the context of current prognostic models, sub-classification of CMML into proliferative and dysplastic subtypes might not provide additional prognostic value. The apparent difference in survival between the two subtypes of CMML is probably accounted for by the higher prevalence of leukocytosis/monocytosis and of ASXL1 mutations in proliferative CMML. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia - clinicobiological characteristics: A multivariate analysis in a series of 70 cases

European Journal Of Haematology ◽

10.1111/j.1600-0609.1989.tb01472.x ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 42 (5) ◽

pp. 466-473 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

M. C. Cañizo ◽

G. Sanz ◽

J. F. San Miguel ◽

T. Vallespi ◽

D. Irriguible ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Download Full-text

Prognostic Value of the ‘Monosomal Karyotype’ Entity in Elderly Patients with AML: a GOELAMS Study of 186 Patients with Unfavourable Cytogenetic Abnormalities.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1577.1577 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1577-1577 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Aurore Perrot ◽

Isabelle Luquet ◽

Arnaud Pigneux ◽

Francine Mugneret ◽

Jacques Delaunay ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Cox Model ◽

Young Patients ◽

Structural Abnormality ◽

Monosomy 7 ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Poor Risk ◽

Prognostic Prediction ◽

Monosomal Karyotype

Abstract Abstract 1577 Poster Board I-603 INTRODUCTION The prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients over 60 years of age remains very poor, especially in those with unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities. Breems et al. recently identified in AML patients under 60 years old, a monosomal karyotype (MK), defined by the presence of at least two autosomal monosomies or one monosomy plus one structural abnormality. MK provides a significantly better prognostic prediction than the conventionally defined complex karyotype (CK) in such young patients [J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4791-7]. METHODS In order to investigate the prognostic relevance of MK in the elderly, a retrospective study of 186 previously untreated AML patients with classically defined unfavourable cytogenetic was performed. All were aged 60 years or more and were selected among patients enrolled in 3 prospective GOELAMS trials (SA4, SA2002 and R04) between 1996 and 2006. In the three consecutive trials, patients were treated with standard dose cytarabine + idarubicin, followed by monthly re-inductions and maintenance. Poor-risk cytogenetics' patients were well-balanced between the treatment's arms and no significant influence of the hypotheses tested in the trials could be demonstrated (beneficial effect of fludarabine, androgenotherapy or gemtuzumab-ozogamicin, respectively) [manuscripts submitted]. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 68 years (range: 60-79 y) and the M/F ratio 95/91. Thirteen percent of the patients had secondary AML. Leukocytosis >30 G/L was noted in 15% of the cases. Poor cytogenetic features included monosomy 5 or del 5q in 89 patients (48%) and monosomy 7 or del 7q in 86 (46%). Only 9 patients (<5%) had 11q23 abnormalities, 15 (8%) 3q21q26 abnormalities and 3 t(6;9). CK (defined by three or more abnormalities) was found in 129 patients (69%) and 109 patients had abnormalities corresponding to MK (58%). Only 9 patients had MK without CK. The overall complete remission rate was 48%, induction failure 35% and induction death 17%. With a median follow-up of 43 months for survivors, overall survival (OS) was 13.7% at 2 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.4%-14.9%). Patients with MK had a significantly lower CR rate at 37% (41/109) vs 65% (49/75) for patients with poor-risk AML without MK (p=.0004) and a significantly increased rate of persistent leukemia at 40% (44/109) vs 20% (15/75) (p=.006). OS was significantly impaired in MK patients: 7% vs 22% at 2 years (p< .0001). In multivariate analysis using a Cox model, MK appeared as the major independent prognostic factor for CR achievement (OR 3.26, CI: 1.75-6.07, p=.0002) and OS (HR 1.84, CI: 1.34-2.52, p=.0001). Age (60-69, ≥70 years) and leukocytosis (<30, ≥30 G/L) did not stand as independent prognostic factors. By comparison with the standard cytogenetic classification, CK carries a worse prognostic prediction for OS than MK (HR 1.53, CI: 1.10-2.12, p=.01). In the subgroup of 129 CK patients, survival was also significantly impaired in MK+ patients: 8% OS at 2 years, by comparison with 25% in MK- patients, (p=.03). CONCLUSION These results, obtained within a cohort of elderly patients with cytogenetically unfavourable AML, show that MK, according to the criteria proposed by Breems et al., is also an independent factor of very poor prognosis in older age, further stratifying prognostic subgroups. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia With Preexisting Myelodysplastic Syndrome Or Myeloproliferative Neoplasm: Two Stages Of One Disease With Poor Prognosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1342.1342 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1342-1342 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yin Xu ◽

Aine Yung ◽

Brian Kwok ◽

Karen Macdonell ◽

Bashar Dabbas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽

De Novo ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Chromosome Abnormalities ◽

Refractory Anemia ◽

Jak2 Mutation ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Two Stages ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Introduction Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic malignancy characterized by persistent monocytosis with features of a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and/or myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). While most cases present as de novo disease, a subset of CMML has been described in the literature to evolve from a preexisting MDS (MDS-CMML). CMML with preexisting MPN (MPN-CMML) has not been characterized to our knowledge. It is uncertain whether CMML patients with preexisting MDS or MPN have one or more disease processes and if such patients behave differently from patients who present with de novo CMML. In an attempt to address these questions, we compared the clinicopathologic features between groups of MDS-CMML, MPN-CMML, and de novo CMML in the present study. Methods 126 cases with newly diagnosed CMML were retrieved from our database over a 3-year period. 22 cases had preexisting MDS (n=15) or MPN (n=7). Prior diagnoses of MDS included refractory anemia (n=5), refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (n=2), MDS with isolated 5q deletion (n=1), refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (n=6), and refractory anemia with excess blasts-1 (n=1). Prior diagnoses of MPN included essential thrombocythemia (n=1), primary myelofibrosis (n=3), and MPN NOS (n=3). Cytogenetic studies were performed in all cases. Other parameters obtained included age, gender, hemoglobin, white blood cell count, monocytes, platelets, bone marrow blasts and histology, and JAK2/MPL mutations. 22 consecutive cases of de novo CMML were included for comparative analysis. Results CMML with preexisting MDS or MPN comprised 17% of CMML (22/126 patients). Among these 22 patients, 15 were male and 7 female with a median age of 79 (range 61-86) years. Median age of the patients at CMML stage was similar to that of patients with de novo CMML (77 years; range 65-89). The median time between disease presentation as MDS or MPN and CMML was 22 months. Patients presented with marked monocytosis at the CMML stage (mean: 23% and 4564/uL) as compared to the stage of MDS (mean: 13% and 794/uL; p<0.001) or MPN (mean: 6.4% and 1216/uL; p<0.001); and the monocyte count was similar to that present in de novo CMML (mean: 24% and 4313/uL). Marrow blasts were significantly increased at the CMML stage as compared to the stage of MDS (mean: 5.3 vs. 1.6; p=0.017), MPN (mean: 5.1 vs. 1.9; p=0.048), or de novo CMML (5.2 vs. 1.9; p=0.009). There was no significant difference in average hemoglobin, platelet count or marrow cellularity between cases at the two disease stages or among the MDS-CMML and MPN-CMML subgroups. However, the marrows of MPN-CMML showed significantly increased diffuse reticulin fibrosis (p=0.002) and marked megakaryocytic hyperplasia (p=0.002) as compared to MDS-CMML. CMML with preexisting MDS or MPN is more frequently associated with cytogenetic abnormalities than de novo CMML (50% vs. 23%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.116). 8 (36%) cases had chromosome abnormalities at the MDS or MPN stages; 7 (87%) of the 8 cases demonstrated persistent chromosome abnormalities at the CMML stage. In addition, 4 (18%) patients acquired chromosome abnormalities at the CMML stage. JAK2 mutation was seen in 1 (7%) of 15 cases of MDS-CMML and 4 (57%) of 7 cases of MPN-CMML. Notably, 2 cases of JAK2 positive MPN became JAK2 negative at the CMML stage; one of the patients had been previously treated with a JAK2 inhibitor. No MPL mutation was found in any case. Conclusions CMML with preexisting MDS or MPN is not uncommon. The majority of cases exhibit persistent chromosomal abnormalities from the preexisting MDS or MPN, supporting the notion of one disease with two stages of presentation. The findings of a higher frequency of cytogenetic abnormalities and occasional cytogenetic evolution may suggest that chromosome alteration is one of the mechanisms involved in triggering disease progression to CMML. JAK2 V617F was more frequent in MPN-CMML, which correlated with myelofibrosis and megakaryocytic hyperplasia. However, loss of JAK2 mutation can occur at CMML stage. Loss/inhibition of JAK2 activity may contribute to a change in disease course. Our study revealed that CMML with preexisting MDS or MPN is characterized by more advanced disease with increased marrow blasts and therefore may be associated with a poorer prognosis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text