Design Of a Phase 1/2 Study Of Moxetumomab Pasudotox In Adult Patients With Relapsed and/Or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5021-5021
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Trishna Goswami ◽  
Fujun Wang ◽  
Ramy Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Multiple Time ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Primary Endpoints

Abstract Background Adult ALL encompasses a heterogeneous group of lymphoid malignancies. Long-term survival in adults is currently only 35% to 45%; the predominant reason for this is disease recurrence. Current outcomes of salvage chemotherapy for ALL are poor, with complete response rates of 20% to 30% depending on prior therapy and duration of first remission. Older patients with ALL who relapse have a very poor prognosis and very limited options. Thus, adults with relapsed/refractory ALL are a population with significant unmet needs, requiring effective salvage therapies that maintain durable remissions. CD22 is expressed on most B-lineage ALL blasts; thus, it is an ideal target for eliminating leukemic cells. Moxetumomab pasudotox (MP) is a recombinant immunoconjugate composed of an anti-CD22 immunoglobulin variable domain genetically fused to a truncated form of Pseudomonasexotoxin, PE38. MP has been clinically tested and showed antitumor activity in other B-cell malignancies including relapsed hairy cell leukemia (Kreitman RJ, et al. J Clin Onc. 2012;30:1822-28) and pediatric ALL (Shah NN, et al. 2nd International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse After HSCT Program and Abstract Book; Bethesda, MD. 2012. P-49). Study Design This is a single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2, single-institution study of MP in relapsed and/or refractory adult patients with ALL. The phase 1 portion will determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the regimen. The phase 2 portion will evaluate the clinical activity of the regimen as well as the tolerability and safety profile. The primary endpoints of the phase 1 are MTD and DLTs. In the phase 2, the primary endpoints are overall response, including complete remission (CR), CR without recovery of counts, and partial remission; the secondary endpoints are event-free survival (time from enrollment to relapse or death, or the last known follow-up) and overall survival at 2 years. MP will be administered intravenously over 30 minutes. The phase 1 will start with a 30 µg/kg dose every other day x 6 doses in a 21-day cycle; it will use a standard 3+3 dose escalation. Additional dose regimens may be investigated. The phase 2 starting dose will be the MTD from phase 1. Dosing will be discontinued upon disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, recommendation for alternate therapy, or patient noncompliance. Minimal residual disease at multiple time points and immunogenicity will be assessed. Enrollment will include a maximum of 60 patients. Conclusion This study will provide new insights into the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory ALL as well as expand upon the clinical activity of MP previously demonstrated in B-cell malignancies. This study is sponsored by MD Anderson Cancer Center. Collaborator: MedImmune. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01891981 Disclosures: Ravandi: MedImmune: Research Funding. Kantarjian:MedImmune: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Goswami:MedImmune: Employment. Wang:MedImmune: Employment. Ibrahim:MedImmune: Employment.

Safety Profile and Clinical Response To MEDI-551, a Humanized Monoclonal Anti-CD19, In a Phase 1/2 Study In Adults With Relapsed Or Refractory Advanced B-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1810-1810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
Michelle A. Fanale ◽  
Celeste M. Bello ◽  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
B Cell Malignancies

Abstract Background MEDI-551 is an affinity-optimized and afucosylated humanized IgG kappa monoclonal antibody directed against CD19 and induces malignant clone destruction by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. This study evaluates the safety profile and clinical activity of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. These include chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and multiple myeloma (MM). Objectives Determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. Secondary objectives include clinical activity of MEDI-551. Methods In this phase 1/2 open-label multicenter, global dose-escalation and expansion study, patients with relapsed or refractory CLL, DLBCL, FL, or MM received MEDI-551 (at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 mg/kg) by intravenous infusion administered over 28-day cycles using standard 3+3 dose escalation. Dose escalation continued to the maximum dose ≤12 mg/kg or until MTD was reached. Therapy continued for 2 cycles beyond complete response (CR), or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as a MEDI-551-related adverse event (AE) that prevented completion of a full first cycle of MEDI-551, or as a ≥grade 3 toxicity (excluding hematologic toxicity) that could not be ascribed to another cause. Results Of 91 patients who received ≥1 dose of MEDI-551, 25 patients (CLL [3], DLBCL [6], FL [12], MM [4]) were enrolled in the phase 1 escalation portion (Jun 2010–Aug 2011). No MTD was achieved. The phase 2 expansion phase included 66 patients (CLL [23], DLBCL [20], FL [22], MM [1]) as of 14Jul2013. Three patients were re-treated with MEDI-551 upon relapse. Median age of patients treated was 66 years; median lines of prior therapy was 6. The median number of treatment cycles was 5 with a maximum of 28 cycles. There were 14 deaths due to AEs (none were drug-related) and 15 subjects discontinued treatment. One subject each discontinued due to drug-related neutropenia and infusion reaction. Most AEs were grade 1/2 with dose-independent frequency and severity (Table). Of 91 patients, 5 (5.5%) patients had grade 4 TEAEs (2 with drug-related neutropenia) and 9 (9.9%) had grade 5 events, none were drug related. Of 19 patients with 38 serious AEs (SAE), 2 patients had 3 events that were considered drug-related; pneumonia and sepsis in 1 patient and infusion related reaction in the other. Of 83 patients in the efficacy evaluable population (includes all patients who received any treatment of MEDI-551 and completed at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment), 9 had CR, 12 had partial responses (PR) and 42 had stable disease (SD; Figure 1). ORR to single-agent MEDI-551 was 24%, 24%, or 31% respectively in heavily pre-treated patients with CLL, DLBCL, or FL. Median progression-free survival was ≈9 months (Figure 2). Conclusions MEDI-551 has an acceptable safety profile warranting further study. Anti-tumor activity was achieved in a heavily pre-treated population of DLBCL, CLL, and FL patients respectively in this single-agent study. Phase 2 studies of MEDI-551 in combination with chemotherapy in DLBCL and CLL are ongoing. Funding Source This study was sponsored by MedImmune. Disclosures: Forero-Torres: MedImmune: Research Funding. Hamadani:MedImmune: Research Funding. Fanale:MedImmune: Research Funding. Bello:MedImmune: Research Funding. Kipps:MedImmune: Research Funding. Offner:MedImmune: Research Funding. Verhoef:MedImmune: Research Funding. Federico:MedImmune: Research Funding. Gregory:MedImmune: Research Funding. Sonet:MedImmune: Research Funding. Assouline:MedImmune: Research Funding. Pérez de Oteyza:MedImmune: Research Funding. Tomas:MedImmune: Research Funding. Cuneo:MedImmune: Research Funding. Elgeioushi:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Goswami:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Ibrahim:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Herbst:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Cheson:MedImmune: Research Funding.

Target Engagement, Pathway Inhibition, and Efficacy Of The Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (Btk) Inhibitor CC-292

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4169-4169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W Pierce ◽  
Sabine Ponader ◽  
Kumudha Balakrishnan ◽  
Varsha Gandhi ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Post Dose ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction The B-cell receptor (BCR) and its downstream effectors have emerged as important therapeutic targets in B-cell malignancies. CC-292 is a novel, potent, covalent, and highly selective inhibitor of Btk (IC50apparent of 0.5 nM, kinact/KI ratio of 7.69 × 104 M-1s-1), that does not appreciably inhibit other kinases involved in BCR signaling (eg, IC50 Lyn kinase, 4401 nM) (Evans et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013). Here, we report preclinical characterization and clinical data in CLL from a single-agent phase 1 dose-escalation trial of CC-292 in B-cell malignancies, with a focus on how target engagement and downstream events correlate with clinical activity. Results Pharmacodynamic effects of Btk inhibition by CC-292 can be monitored by occupancy of the Btk catalytic site, Btk autophosphorylation on Y223, and downstream phosphorylation of Plc-γ2 and Erk. We developed a sensitive (10 pg/mL lower limit of quantification) and quantitative assay to measure covalent binding of CC-292 to Btk (Evans et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013), as well as Western and novel phos-flow assays to probe downstream signal transduction. These methods showed that CC-292 treatment blocks Btk autophosphorylation and downstream pathway activation in both tumor cells and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The extent of CC-292 binding to Btk correlated with its in vitro and in vivo effects. The occupancy assay demonstrated that CC-292 effectively targets Btk in tumor cell lines, PBMCs, spleen, and lymph nodes (LNs) in animal models, and in PBMC and lymph node samples from clinical trial subjects. In rats and non-human primates treated with CC-292, Btk occupancy in spleen and LNs was dose-dependent. Measured occupancy in rat spleen and axillary, mesenteric, and superficial cervical LNs was 94%, 92%, 90%, and 76% respectively, 4 hours (hrs) after a single 30-mg/kg dose. Interim data from the phase 1 CLL trial showed that PBMC Btk was completely occupied in the majority of subjects 4 hrs post-dose with both QD and BID dosing. Twenty-four hrs post-dose at 750 and 1000 mg QD, CC-292 exhibited 83% ± 17% Btk occupancy, whereas with BID dosing at 375 and 500 mg, occupancy was 94% ± 16% at the corresponding time point (12 hrs after the second dose). Thus, while both schedules achieved extensive and sustained Btk occupancy, residual free Btk levels were lower with the BID schedule, offering a rationale for an early trend towards more rapid nodal responses, lymphocytosis, and partial responses on the BID schedule observed to date in the phase 1 study. In the 10 clinical LN biopsies tested to date, no measurable levels of unoccupied Btk have been detected, although Btk protein was present as determined by Western blotting, showing that CC-292 was able to penetrate LNs and inhibit Btk in human subjects as it did in preclinical models. For monitoring downstream signal transduction, we developed reagents and assays including a phos-flow assay based on a novel rabbit monoclonal antibody to detect Btk pY223 levels in PBMC subsets. CC-292 effectively inhibited constitutive and induced phosphorylation of Btk and Plc-γ2 at low nanomolar concentrations. CC-292 also inhibited BCR activation and nurse-like cell–supported survival of CLL cells. Furthermore, CC-292 reduced CLL cell migration and actin polymerization in response to chemokines (CXCL12, CXCL13) and inhibited secretion of the chemokines CCL3 and CCL4 by CLL cells. These chemokines are essential for migration and retention of normal and neoplastic B cells in the marrow and secondary lymphatic tissues. Consistent with this preclinical data, CC-292 treatment resulted in rapid reductions in circulating CCL3 and CCL4 levels. In subjects treated at the 750 mg QD, 1000 mg QD, 375 mg BID, and 500 mg BID dose levels, plasma CCL3 was reduced from 99 ± 16 pg/ml before treatment to 28 ± 5 pg/ml (N = 48, mean ± SEM) at 24 hrs after the first dose, while CCL4 was reduced from 235 ± 59 pg/ml to 74 ± 16 pg/ml (N = 51). Conclusions These data demonstrate that CC-292 achieves significant and durable occupancy of Btk in vitro and in vivo, inhibits Btk-mediated downstream signaling events and chemokine production, and that these preclinical activities have translated into the clinic. Taken together, these results argue that Btk inhibition is necessary and sufficient for clinical activity in CLL. These emerging data support continued development of CC-292 for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Disclosures: Pierce: Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. O'Brien:Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent: Consultancy, Research Funding; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Talon: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva/Cephalon: Consultancy. Heise:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nacht:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Aslanian:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hong:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zavodovskaya:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Marine:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barnett:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nava-Parada:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mei:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chopra:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Burger:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Singh:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

177lu-Satetraxetan-Lilotomab in the Treatment of Patients with Indolent Non-Hodgkin B-Cell Lymphoma (NHL), Phase 1/2 Safety and Efficacy Data from Four Different Pre-Dosing Regimens

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1780-1780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Kolstad ◽  
Ulf Madsbu ◽  
Matthew Beasley ◽  
Michael Bayne ◽  
Tim Illidge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Dosing Regimen ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Pre Treatment

Abstract 177Lu-Satetraxetan-lilotomab (Betalutin®) is a novel CD37-binding IgG1 antibody labelled with the beta-emitter lutetium-177, in a ready-to-use formulation currently in Phase 1/2 clinical development for the treatment of Non-Hodgkins lymphoma. CD37 is an internalizing transmembrane antigen highly expressed on most B-cell malignancies, and is a promising therapeutic target. The optimisation of the pre-dosing regimen prior to administration of 177Lu-Satetraxetan-lilotomab may result in an improved safety and efficacy profile. The phase 1 stage of this study is designed with 4 arms to test different pre-dosing regimens (no pre-dosing, rituximab and two doses of lilotomab) on the effect of 177Lu-Satetraxetan-lilotomab. Methods: Patients with relapsed incurable NHL of follicular grade I-IIIA, marginal zone, mantle cell, lymphoplasmacytic and small lymphocytic subtypes and with platelet counts ≥ 150 x109/l were eligible for inclusion in the study. All patients received pre-treatment with rituximab (375 mg/m2) to deplete peripheral B cells and improve biodistribution of the labelled antibody. Pre-dosing with lilotomab (cold anti-CD37 antibody) was given in arms 1 and 4 or rituximab in arm 3, within 4 hours of 177Lu-Satetraxetan-lilotomab to block binding in the non-tumour tissue. The pre-treatment and pre-dosing regimen used in each arm is summarised below: Arm 1: rituximab day1 and 8, lilotomab (40 mg) plus Betalutin day 29 Arm 2: rituximab day 1 and 8, Betalutin day 29 Arm 3: rituximab day 1, rituximab plus Betalutin day 15 Arm 4: rituximab day 1, lilotomab (100 mg/m2) plus Betalutin day 15 The starting dose for Arm 1 was10 MBq/kg and was 15 MBq/kg for arm 2, 3 and 4 and in phase 2. Response was assessed by FDG PET/CT scans at 3 and 6 months post-treatment and then by CT scan up to 5 years after treatment. The results of the protocol specified interim analysis will be presented. Results: A total of36 patients have been enrolled into study, of which 24 are currently evaluable. Patients enrolled into the study had either follicular (n=20), mantel cell (n=2) or marginal zone (n=2) lymphoma. The number of prior therapies ranged from 1 to 8. The efficacy and safety results from patients enrolled into Arms 3 and 4 and treated with two different pre-dosing regimens will be presented for the first time. The most common toxicities observed were hematologic with all dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) being reversible and manageable and related to thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. At a dose of 15 MBq/kg, pre-dosing with 40 mg of lilotomab (Arm 1 and phase 2) reduced the incidence of hematological DLTs to 14% (2/14 patients) compared with 100% (2/2 patients) with no pre-dosing in Arm 2. No DLTs have been reported at 10 MBq/kg in either Arm 1 or 2. Fourteen serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported by 8 patients: Atrial fibrillation (n=2) and platelet count decreased (n=2) were the only SAEs reported by more than one patient. There have been no deaths and no secondary malignancies or other long-term safety events. The overall tumor response rate observed in 23 patients evaluable for efficacy was 57%, comprising 7/23 complete responses, 6/23 partial responses, 5/23 stable disease and 5/23 with progressive disease. In addition, one patient had a confirmed transformed lymphoma at 3 months. One patient is still in remission more than 3 years after treatment and two further patients are still in remission more than 2 years after treatment. Conclusions: Betalutin has the potential to be a novel, safe and effective therapy for B-cell malignancies with durable responses. Betalutin, a single dose, ready-to-use formulation, has a predictable and manageable safety profile which is improved by pre-dosing. Most AEs were haematological, all transient and reversible. Disclosures Kolstad: Nordic Nanovector: Other: Membership of Scientific Advisory Board. Illidge:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy. Dahle:Nordic Nanovector ASA: Employment, Equity Ownership. Baylor Curtis:Nordic Nanovector: Employment. Østengen:Nordic Nanovector: Employment. Turner:Nordic Nanovector: Employment. Hartvig Larsen:Nordic nanovector: Equity Ownership. Holte:Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

The Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, PCI-32765, Is Well Tolerated and Demonstrates Promising Clinical Activity In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL): An Update on Ongoing Phase 1 Studies

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 57-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Nathan Fowler ◽  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Jeff Porte Sharman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Bcr Signaling ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 57 Introduction: Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk) is a downstream mediator of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling and is not expressed in T-cells or NK-cells. As such, Btk represents an ideal therapeutic target for B-cell malignancies dependent upon BCR signaling. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL) has been reported to have constitutively active BCR signaling. PCI-32765 is a potent, selective, irreversible and orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of Btk that has pre-clinical activity in B-cell malignancies (Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010;107(29):13075-80). PCI-32765 was therefore moved forward to a Phase 1 study in B-cell malignancies including patients (pts) with CLL/SLL. A subsequent CLL/SLL-specific Phase 1b study was initiated to further explore safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of PCI-32765. This report includes a composite summary of the CLL/SLL experience in both of these studies. Pts and Methods: Pts with CLL/SLL who had relapsed or refractory disease after >1 prior treatment regimens were eligible for treatment in each of the studies whereas the second Phase 1b study also included a cohort of elderly pts (aged ≥ 65 years) with CLL/SLL who required treatment and were “treatment-naive”. Responses were assessed by the investigator using the International Working Group CLL criteria (Hallek et al, Blood 2008 for pts with CLL) and the International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas (Cheson et al, J Clin Oncol 2007 for pts with SLL). Results: To date, 30 CLL/SLL patients (including 4 treatment-naive) have been enrolled across the 2 studies. Eighty-four percent of subjects are men with an overall median age of 68 (range 44–82) years. Of the subjects with prior therapy for CLL/SLL the median number of prior therapies is 3 (range 1–4). Treatment has been well-tolerated; Grade ≥ 3 toxicities have been infrequent (10/30 pts; 33%). Two study-drug related serious adverse events have been reported: 1 case of viral adenitis (Grade 3) and 1 case of viral infection (Grade 2). Two adverse events have led to discontinuation of study drug: a small bowel obstruction (Grade 3) and exacerbation of chronic obstructive disease (Grade 3); both events were reported as unrelated to study drug. No study-drug related deaths have reported. There has been no change in either NK cell or T cell counts. Target inhibition as measured by a probe of Btk drug occupancy showed inhibition of Btk at PCI-32765 exposure levels of ≥ 245 ng•h/mL. Of the 14 patients currently evaluable for response using the pre-defined criteria, the overall response rate is 64% (1 complete remission [CR], 8 partial remissions [PR], and 4 SD). Both studies are ongoing and open to enrollment. An update on response rate, response duration, safety, and PD information will be presented on enrolled patients based on a November 2010 database cut-off. Conclusion: PCI-32765 is a novel oral and selective “first-in-human” inhibitor of Btk that induces objective partial and complete responses in a substantial proportion of pts with CLL/SLL and has a favorable safety profile. These data support further studies of both monotherapy and also combination treatment with PCI-32765 in CLL/SLL. Disclosures: O'Brien: Pharmacyclics, Inc: Honoraria, PI grant. Fowler:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Advani:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Honoraria, PI grant. Sharman:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Honoraria, PI grant. Furman:Pharmacyclics, Inc: PI grant. Izumi:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Employment. Buggy:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Loury:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hamdy:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Disparity in Clinical Trial Opportunities for Patients with B-Cell Malignancies in the United States

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4861-4861
Author(s):  
Sikander Ailawadhi ◽  
Sri Lekha Bodepudi ◽  
Zan Tahir Shareef ◽  
Fabiola Coromoto Cardozo ◽  
Salman Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Geographical Distribution ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
The Us

Abstract Background: Clinical trials are fundamental to advance therapeutics systematically and improve patient outcomes. Despite this, enrollment on clinical trials remains dismal in the United States (US) and is a constant focus of healthcare policy. We studied distribution of clinical trials for B-cell malignancies over time across the US and unique clinical trial opportunities i.e. individual clinical trials for the given diagnosis at a site that patients may have access to participate. Methods: We abstracted data from clinicaltrials.gov for all trials that had non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM) as an inclusion indication between 1999-2018. Clinical trial characteristics and distribution over US geographical divisions (West, Midwest, Northeast, and South) were studied, and differences were assessed by Chi-square test. Results: A total of 1930 trials were identified (NHL: 982, MM: 948), of which 483 were recruiting at the time of data abstraction (NHL: 250, MM: 233). Over the past 2 decades, 182691 patients were enrolled on the various trials (NHL: 81592, MM: 101099). Trials by phase of study included phase 1: 629, phase 1/2: 316, phase 2: 813, phase 2/3: 11 and phase 3: 161. Number of trials by phase separated by NHL and MM are shown in Figure 1. Of these, 197 trials were randomized (NHL: 67, MM: 130). Geographical distribution of trials by diagnosis type is shown in Figure 2. A total of 31806 unique trial opportunities were noted for MM and NHL, of which 9,513 were international and 22,293 were in the US, with a geographical distribution of 5080 in West, 8198 in Midwest, 3944 in Northeast, and 5071 in South. 4,883 of the unique trial opportunities were available at NCI/NCCN accredited sites and 17,410 were at non-NCI/NCCN sites in the US. Treatment characteristics of the trials included monoclonal antibodies in 1218, other targeted agents in 2641, stem cell transplant in 526, and other agents in 517 trials with several trials utilizing more than one of these therapeutic options. There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of clinical trials by phase of study across various US geographical regions for MM (p=0.71), NHL (p=0.98) or combined MM+NHL (p=0.16). On the other hand, unique trial opportunities were significantly different by study phase and geographical distribution for MM, NHL or MM+NHL (all p<0.001) (Figure 3). Conclusions: Widespread access to clinical trials within a cancer diagnosis is imperative for generalizability of trial results. In a comprehensive, national analysis we noted that while it may appear that clinical trials are available across the US, sites where they are open are distributed unevenly, giving rise to a disparity in access to evidence-based therapeutic advancements for patients. Disclosures Ailawadhi: Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Sher:Affimed: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Results from a First-in-Human, Proof-of-Concept Phase 1 Trial in Pretreated B-Cell Malignancies for Loxo-305, a Next-Generation, Highly Selective, Non-Covalent BTK Inhibitor

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 501-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony R. Mato ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
Jennifer R. Brown ◽  
Chan Y. Cheah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
B Cell Malignancies

Introduction: Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have transformed the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and other B-cell malignancies by inducing durable responses, improving quality of life and prolonging overall survival. Prolonged use of BTKi in the real-world setting is limited by toxicity and acquired resistance. Discontinuation rates for BTKis may be as high as 40% in relapsed/refractory CLL, with BTK C481-mediated resistance evident in many progressing patients. Alternative therapies such as venetoclax are associated with on-target (BCL2) acquired resistance. We hypothesized that a selective, non-covalent BTKi would benefit patients with B-cell malignancies in the setting of acquired resistance and/ or unacceptable toxicities following an irreversible BTKi. LOXO-305 is a next-generation, highly selective, oral, non-covalent BTKi that inhibits wild-type and C481-mutated BTK preclinically. Here, we report results from a first-in-human, proof-of-concept phase 1 trial in patients with B-cell malignancies. Methods: This multicenter phase 1/2 trial (NCT 03740529) enrolled patients with advanced B-cell malignancies who had failed or were intolerant to &gt; 2 prior therapies. LOXO-305 was dosed orally in 28-day cycles, using a standard 3+3 dose-escalation design with a primary endpoint of MTD/RP2D identification. Results: As of 26 July 2019, 13 patients (9 CLL and 4 MCL) were enrolled to 3 dose levels: 25mg (n=5), 50mg (n=5) and 100mg (n=3) QD. Median age was 65 (range 51-79) years and the median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 2-6). 12 patients (8 CLL, 4 MCL) received prior chemotherapy + anti-CD20 antibody; 2 MCL patients underwent prior autologous stem cell transplantation; 5 CLL patients received prior umbralisib; 10 patients (7 CLL, 3 MCL) received prior ibrutinib (5 intolerant, 5 relapsed), including 1 who had also received venetoclax. 6 CLL patients displayed high-risk genetic features, including unmutated IGHV (4), complex karyotype (4) and del17p (3). Molecular characterization was available in 7 patients (6 CLL, 1 MCL) and revealed: BTK C481S mutations (in 2 CLL patients post-ibrutinib), a BCL2 G101V mutation (in a CLL patient post-venetoclax), and a TP53 mutation (in an MCL patient post-ibrutinib). At doses ≥50 mg QD, LOXO-305 exposure exceeded the calculated IC90 for wild-type and C481S mutated BTK. No DLTs were reported and all TEAEs are grade 1-2. Clinical activity was noted within the first cycle of therapy and at the first dose level of 25mg QD. The first eight patients were evaluable for initial response and 7 tumor responses (87.5%) were observed (by disease-defined criteria): 5/5 CLL patients (1 PR and 4 PR-L including one with BTK C481S mutation after ibrutinib and one with BCL2 G101V mutation after venetoclax) and 2/3 MCL patients (2 PR and 1 PD with a preexisting TP53 mutation). 2 additional CLL patients were awaiting initial radiologic assessment but had already demonstrated treatment-induced lymphocytosis. 12/13 patients remain on therapy, the longest 5+ months. Conclusion: Phase 1 data with LOXO-305 demonstrate a favorable safety profile and provide proof-of-concept evidence of efficacy in heavily pretreated CLL and MCL patients, including patients with acquired resistance to available BTKis and venetoclax. Disclosures Mato: DTRM Biopharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: DSMB member , Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; LOXO: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding. Flinn:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma, Agios, Calithera Biosciences, Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Consultancy. Pagel:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Brown:Teva: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Dynamo Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Loxo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Catapult Therapeutics: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; Invectys: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Morphosys: Other: Data safety monitoring board; AbbVie: Consultancy. Cheah:Roche, Janssen, MSD, Gilead, Loxo Oncology, Acerta, BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Roche, Abbvie: Research Funding; Roche: Other: Travel expenses. Coombs:Medscape: Honoraria; Covance: Consultancy; Cowen & Co.: Consultancy; H3 Biomedicine: Honoraria; Dedham Group: Consultancy; Loxo: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Octopharma: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. Rothenberg:LOXO Oncology Inc.: Employment. Tsai:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Ku:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Wang:BioInvent: Consultancy, Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Aviara: Research Funding.

scholarly journals ZUMA-4: A Phase 1/2 Multicenter Study of KTE-X19 in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 42-42
Author(s):  
Alan S. Wayne ◽  
Gerard Michel ◽  
Daniel W. Lee ◽  
André Baruchel ◽  
Sonali Chaudhury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Primary Phase ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Publicly Traded

Background: Although approximately 80% - 85% of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common childhood malignancy, achieve durable complete remissions (CRs) after initial treatment, the remaining 15% - 20% of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) ALL have unfavorable outcomes (Leukemia2018;32:2316-25; N Engl J Med 2015;373:1541-52) and could benefit from effective new therapies. KTE-X19 is an autologous, anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy approved for the treatment of R/R mantle cell lymphoma and under investigation for additional R/R hematologic malignancies including chronic lymphocytic leukemia, adult ALL, and pediatric B cell ALL and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). KTE-X19 treatment has shown high rates of CRs, with a manageable safety profile for adult patients with R/R B cell ALL in the Phase 1 portion of ZUMA-3, including those with poor risk factors (J Clin Oncol 2019;37[suppl, abstr]:7006). ZUMA-4 is an ongoing Phase 1/2 study evaluating KTE-X19 in pediatric and adolescent patients with R/R B cell ALL or NHL (NCT02625480). End-of-Phase 1 interim analysis of ZUMA-4 showed the feasibility of KTE-X19 therapy with optimized dosing and adverse event (AE) management strategies for the treatment of pediatric patients with R/R ALL (Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019;66[suppl]:S24). The protocol for Phase 2 of ZUMA-4 has been amended to include broader B cell ALL enrollment criteria with a focus on patients with early relapse associated with poorer outcomes, and an NHL cohort was added. Methods: Key B cell ALL enrollment criteria include age ≤ 21 years, weight ≥ 10 kg, and B cell ALL that is primary refractory, relapsed within 18 months of first diagnosis, R/R after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy, or R/R after allogeneic stem cell transplantation at least 100 days prior to enrollment. Criteria for disease burden have been amended to also include patients with minimal residual disease-positive disease at enrollment. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL are eligible if intolerant to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy or if R/R after ≥ 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. Patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia lymphoid blast crisis or clinically significant infections are not eligible. For B cell NHL, key enrollment criteria include age &lt; 18 years, weight ≥ 10 kg, histologically confirmed diffuse large B cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (DLBCL NOS), primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma (BL), Burkitt-like lymphoma or unclassified B cell lymphomas intermediate between DLBCL and BL, with ≥ 1 measurable lesion. For NHL, disease must be primary refractory, R/R after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy, or R/R after autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation ≥ 100 days prior to enrollment. Patients with acute graft-versus-host disease or chronic graft-versus-host disease requiring treatment within 4 weeks of enrollment are not eligible. Patients with central nervous system-1 disease (no detectable lymphoblasts in cerebrospinal fluid), with central nervous system-2 disease (detectable disease, but white blood cell count &lt; 5/μL in cerebrospinal fluid) without clinically evident neurologic changes, or who had prior blinatumomab treatment can be included in the ALL and NHL cohorts. Patients with prior CD19-directed therapy, except for blinatumomab, are excluded. Patients receive conditioning chemotherapy with fludarabine 25 mg/m2 on Days −4, −3, and −2 and cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m2 on Day −2 followed by a single infusion of KTE-X19 at a target dose of 1 × 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg on Day 0. The study has completed the Phase 1 portion and is currently enrolling in Phase 2, with a target accrual of approximately 50 additional patients with ALL and 16 with NHL. For ALL, the primary Phase 2 objective is to evaluate KTE-X19 efficacy as assessed by overall CR rate (CR + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery). For NHL, the primary Phase 2 objective is KTE-X19 efficacy assessment by objective response rate (complete response + partial response). Secondary Phase 2 objectives for ALL and NHL cohorts include safety and tolerability, additional efficacy endpoints, and changes in patient-reported outcome scores. ZUMA-4 is currently recruiting at 23 sites in the United States, Canada, France, and the Netherlands. Disclosures Wayne: Servier: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding. Lee:Amgen Oncology: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Harpoon Therapeutics: Consultancy. Baruchel:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy. Brown:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Servier: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Hermiston:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Krueger:Atara: Other: Travel support; Kite, a Gilead Company: Other: Travel support; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; no honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Shen:Gilead: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment, Other: Travel support. Tailford:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Masouleh:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

scholarly journals ZUMA-11: A Phase 1/2 Multicenter Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) + Utomilumab Patients with Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4084-4084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Reshef ◽  
David B. Miklos ◽  
John M. Timmerman ◽  
Caron A. Jacobson ◽  
Nabila N. Bennani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T

Background: Relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is associated with poor outcomes to standard salvage therapy (Crump M, et al. Blood. 2017). In SCHOLAR-1, a large multicenter, patient-level, retrospective study, patients with R/R diffuse LBCL had a 26% objective response rate (ORR) to the next line of therapy, a 7% complete response (CR) rate, and a median overall survival of 6.3 months (Crump M, et al. Blood 2017). Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy approved for patients with R/R LBCL with ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. With a median follow-up of 27.1 months in ZUMA-1, the ORR with axi-cel was 83% (58% CR rate) in patients with refractory LBCL (Locke FL, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). Activation of the costimulatory receptor 4-1BB (CD137) on CAR T cells may enhance axi-cel antitumor activity by enhancing T cell proliferation, function, and survival. Utomilumab (uto), an investigational monoclonal antibody agonist of the 4-1BB pathway, enhanced T cell function and survival in preclinical studies (Fisher TS, et al. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012) and had favorable single-agent safety in patients (Segal NH, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2018). Possible mechanisms of resistance to axi-cel are thought to be suboptimal CAR T cell expansion an exclusionary tumor microenvironment and CD19 target antigen loss (Neelapu SS, et al. Blood 2017, Rossi JM, et al J Immunother Cancer. 2018). Combination strategies that increase proliferation, expansion, and persistence of CAR T cells or prevent activation-induced cell death of CAR T cells may improve clinical outcomes observed with axi-cel. ZUMA-11 is a Phase 1/2 study investigating the efficacy and safety of axi-cel + uto in patients with refractory LBCL. Methods: The primary objectives of this study are to determine the safety, recommended Phase 2 dosing and timing (Phase 1), and efficacy (Phase 2) of axi-cel + uto in adult patients with refractory LBCL. Patients with progressive or stable disease as the best response to second-line chemotherapy or relapse ≤ 12 months after autologous stem cell transplantation, a prior anti-CD20 antibody and anthracycline-containing regimen, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 are eligible. Patients with histologically proven primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma, history of Richter's transformation or chronic lymphocytic lymphoma, prior CAR T cell therapy, or central nervous system involvement of lymphoma are ineligible. In Phase 1, ≈24 patients in ≤ 3 cohorts will receive a single dose of axi-cel and escalating doses of uto (10, 30, or 100 mg) using a 3 + 3 design in up to 4 of 6 cohorts. The recommended uto dose will be based on dose-limiting toxicities and other factors. Patients will be leukapheresed and may receive optional, nonchemotherapy bridging therapy per investigator decision. After conditioning chemotherapy, patients will receive a single infusion of axi-cel (target dose, 2 × 106 CAR T cells/kg) on Day 0 followed by uto on Day 1 and every 4 weeks for 6 months or until progressive disease. Patients will be treated one at a time during Phase 1, and patients treated with axi-cel will be staggered by ≥ 2 weeks. Day 21 uto administration will be explored if toxicity is unacceptable with Day 1 administration. The primary endpoints are incidence of dose-limiting toxicities in Phase 1 and CR rate in Phase 2. Secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and levels of CAR T cells and cytokines in blood. This study uses a single-arm design to estimate the true CR rate; with a sample size of 27 patients, of which ≤ 3 patients will have been treated in the Phase 1 portion, the maximum half-width of the 95% confidence interval about response will be ≥ 21%. ZUMA-11 is open and accruing patients. Disclosures Reshef: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Atara: Consultancy, Research Funding; Magenta: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Miklos:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Becton Dickinson: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; AlloGene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Kite, A Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene-Juno: Consultancy. Timmerman:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Kite, A Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; ImmunGene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Jacobson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Humanigen: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support. Bennani:Kite, A Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rossi:Kite, A Gilead Company: Employment. Sherman:Kite, A Gilead Company: Employment. Sun:Kite, A Gilead Company: Employment. Palluconi:Kite, A Gilead Company: Employment. Kim:Kite, A Gilead Company: Employment. Jain:Kite/Gilead: Consultancy.

Pralatrexate and Gemcitabine in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoproliferative Malignancies: Phase 1 Results.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1674-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Horwitz ◽  
Julie M. Vose ◽  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Kamalesh Sankhala ◽  
Swaminathan Padmanabhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Group A ◽  
Refractory Lymphoma ◽  
Group B

Abstract Abstract 1674 Poster Board I-700 Background Pralatrexate is a new anti-folate with increased affinity for the reduced folate carrier 1 (RFC-1) and longer intracellular retention in tumor cells due to efficient polyglutamation by folylpolyglutamyl synthetase (FPGS). Pralatrexate and gemcitabine each have activity as monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. Preclinical data reported synergy for the combination in NHL cell lines and xenografts that was schedule dependent (pralatrexate followed by gemcitabine) (Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:924-932). We initiated a multi-center Phase 1/2a study (PDX-009; NCT00481871) to evaluate this treatment combination. The primary objective of the Phase 1 portion was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and optimal Phase 2 dose and schedule for the combination of pralatrexate and gemcitabine in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. Methods Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed lymphoma, progressive disease after ≥1 prior treatment and ECOG performance score 0-2. Patients in group A (n=7) received pralatrexate on day 1 and gemcitabine on day 2, once weekly for 3/4 wks. Patients in group B (n=10) also received pralatrexate and gemcitabine on sequential days, but were treated only every 2 wks (q2w). Patients in group C (n=17) received pralatrexate followed 1h later by gemcitabine on the same day q2w. All patients received vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation. Prior gemcitabine exposure was permitted. Results As of May 2009, 34 patients were treated in Phase 1, including 24 men (71%), and median age was 63 years (range, 19-81). Histology included 13 patients with B-cell lymphoma, 11 with T/NK-cell lymphoma, 7 with Hodgkin's lymphoma, and 3 with “other” lymphoma. Patients had received a median of 3.5 prior regimens (range 1-11). All patients with once-weekly sequential-day dosing (pralatrexate 10-15 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 300-400 mg/m2) in Group A had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia; therefore accrual to this schedule was halted and subsequent cohorts received pralatrexate with gemcitabine on the q2w schedule (groups B and C). The MTD with the q2w dosing schedule was pralatrexate/gemcitabine 10/400 mg/m2 when given on sequential days (group B) and 15/600 mg/m2 when given on the same day (group C). The DLTs for group B were cellulitis, pulmonary embolus, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia and the DLTs for Group C were fatigue, hypoxia, mucositis, and thrombocytopenia. Across all groups, the most frequently reported Gr 3-4 pralatrexate-related adverse events were neutropenia (41%), thrombocytopenia (35%), anemia (29%), and leukopenia (12%). Of 33 patients who were evaluable for response, 7 (21%) showed partial response, including patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (4), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (1), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (1), and composite diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and T-cell lymphoma (1). Responses were seen in patients treated on the same day as well as the sequential day schedules. Conclusion Treatment with pralatrexate and gemcitabine is feasible, with acceptable toxicity, when administered on a q2w schedule. However, the MTD of each drug is 50% greater when given on the same day as compared to treating on sequential days. Preliminary results show activity of the combination of pralatrexate and gemcitabine in lymphoid malignancies with a 21% response rate in this heavily pretreated population. Phase 2 expansions at the MTD will explore both sequential-day dosing (10/400 mg/m2) and same-day dosing (15/600 mg/m2) in a q2w schedule. Disclosures Horwitz: Allos Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Advani:Allos Therapeutics, Inc: Research Funding. Fruchtman:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document