High-Throughput Drug Screening Identifies Pyrimethamine As a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2304-2304
Author(s):  
Amit Sharma ◽  
Nidhi Jyotsana ◽  
Courteney K. Lai ◽  
Anuhar Chaturvedi ◽  
Kerstin Görlich ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell differentiation is blocked in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) resulting in cytopenias and high risk of death. Most patients with AML become resistant to treatment due to lack of effective cytotoxic and differentiation fostering compounds. High expression of MN1 confers poor prognosis to AML patients and induces resistance to cytarabine and all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) induced differentiation. We thus set out to identify compounds which could potentially overcome the differentiation block in AML. Methods: Based on the above concepts and in an effort to identify novel compounds which are potent inducers of differentiation and apoptosis in AML, high-throughput drug screening was employed in the MN1 leukemic model. A total of 3580 bioactive compounds were tested in duplicate at a concentration of 2.5 µM using alamar blue fluorescence as readout. As MN1 cells are resistant to ATRA (at 1µM and even 10µM ATRA), the drug screening was performed in the presence of a clinically relevant dose of ATRA (1 µM) to identify compounds that concurrently act with the cytotoxic and/or differentiating effects of ATRA. To determine whether a compound was effective as monotherapy or if it synergized with ATRA, we also performed a validation phase study in which the IC50 of each candidate compound was tested alone and in combination with ATRA. Fifty-four inhibitors were chosen from the primary screen for further validation based on presumed mechanism of action and novelty. The shortlisted compound pyrimethamine (PMT) was validated for its differentiation and apoptosis promoting effects in various murine and human AML models. Results: Our high-throughput drug screening identified 117 compounds, which reduced MN1 leukemic cell proliferation by more than 80% above the ATRA-treated control in both replicates (inhibitors), 8 borderline inhibitors (one replicate with more than 80% inhibition and one with 74 to 80% inhibition), and 35 outliers, which inhibited cell proliferation by 80% or more in only one replicate. The biologic processes most frequently targeted by the 117 inhibitors were DNA replication (n=26), microtubule assembly (n=12), NF-kB pathway (n=8), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR, n=3) and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). Dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors, pyrimethamine and amethopterin/methotrexate emerged as top hits from the screening and preliminary validation studies. Validation studies identified the antifolate pyrimethamine (PMT) that potently induced apoptosis and differentiation in several murine and human leukemic cell lines when administered as a single agent. The cytotoxic effects of pyrimethamine were reversed by addition of an excess of folic acid whereas induction of myeloid differentiation at higher concentrations of pyrimethamine was not mediated through DHFR inhibition. We further evaluated the effect of pyrimethamine in an in vivo xenograft mouse model by subcutaneously inducing tumors with HL60 and THP1 cell lines. Oral pyrimethamine treatment significantly reduced tumor volumes after 14, 19 and 24 days post-transplantation and at death compared to solvent treated mice (P<0.01). The effect of pyrimethamine was further assessed in primary human AML cells and normal CD34+ cells by CFC assays. Colony numbers from primary AML cells, but not normal CD34+ bone marrow cells, were significantly reduced by pyrimethamine as compared to solvent control. Thus, our study identifies pyrimethamine as a candidate drug that is a potent and specific inducer of apoptosis and differentiation with the property of specifically targeting leukemic cells. Conclusion: Our high-throughput drug screening identified pyrimethamine as a potent and specific antileukemic compound and reinforces targeting of folate metabolism as a treatment strategy in acute myeloid leukemia. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 818-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Sharma ◽  
Nidhi Jyotsana ◽  
Courteney K. Lai ◽  
Anuhar Chaturvedi ◽  
Razif Gabdoulline ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 101048
Author(s):  
Priscilla Wander ◽  
Susan T.C.J.M. Arentsen-Peters ◽  
Sandra S. Pinhanҫos ◽  
Bianca Koopmans ◽  
M.Emmy M. Dolman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernestina Saulle ◽  
Isabella Spinello ◽  
Maria Teresa Quaranta ◽  
Luca Pasquini ◽  
Elvira Pelosi ◽  
...  

Metabolism in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells is dependent primarily on oxidative phosphorylation. However, in order to sustain their high proliferation rate and metabolic demand, leukemic blasts use a number of metabolic strategies, including glycolytic metabolism. Understanding whether monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT4, which remove the excess of lactate produced by cancer cells, represent new hematological targets, and whether their respective inhibitors, AR-C155858 and syrosingopine, can be useful in leukemia therapy, may reveal a novel treatment strategy for patients with AML. We analyzed MCT1 and MCT4 expression and function in hematopoietic progenitor cells from healthy cord blood, in several leukemic cell lines and in primary leukemic blasts from patients with AML, and investigated the effects of AR-C155858 and syrosingopine, used alone or in combination with arabinosylcytosine, on leukemic cell proliferation. We found an inverse correlation between MCT1 and MCT4 expression levels in leukemic cells, and showed that MCT4 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in AML patients. We also found that AR-C155858 and syrosingopine inhibit leukemic cell proliferation by activating two different cell-death related pathways, i.e., necrosis for AR-C155858 treatment and autophagy for syrosingopine, and showed that AR-C155858 and syrosingopine exert an anti-proliferative effect, additive to chemotherapy, by enhancing leukemic cells sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. Altogether, our study shows that inhibition of MCT1 or MCT4 impairs leukemic cell proliferation, suggesting that targeting lactate metabolism may be a new therapeutic strategy for AML, and points to MCT4 as a potential therapeutic target in AML patients and to syrosingopine as a new anti-proliferative drug and inducer of autophagy to be used in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic agents in AML treatment.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 40-41
Author(s):  
Caitlin O'Neill ◽  
Akil Merchant ◽  
Parkash S. Gill ◽  
Casey L. O'Connell

Background: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic neoplasm that results in bone marrow failure and frequently leads to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Hypomethylating agents (HMA) are the only FDA-approved treatment for MDS and among few options for chemotherapy-ineligible patients with AML. There are limited options for patients in whom HMA therapy fails and who are not candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplant, so therapies that complement or restore sensitivity to HMAs are needed. Studies have shown increases in bone marrow microvessel density (MVD) and angiogenic markers in patients with MDS and AML. A decrease in MVD has been shown to correlate with response to hypomethylating agents in MDS. A receptor-ligand interaction, comprised of receptor EphB4 and membrane localized ligand EphrinB2, mediates angiogenesis in normal tissue and appears to be a target unique to many cancer types. We have previously shown EphB4 to be highly expressed and a driver of leukemic cell survival in a subset of AML patients. Our group has developed a human fusion protein, sEphB4-HSA, that blocks bidirectional signaling induced by EphB4-EphrinB2 interaction to inhibit tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis. In phase I clinical trials of sEphB4-HSA in various tumor types, there were no myelosuppressive effects and minimal toxicity. Given its safety in phase I and potential to inhibit leukemic cell proliferation and angiogenesis, we proposed a pilot trial to evaluate the safety of sEphB4-HSA in combination with HMAs in MDS and AML patients who have failed treatment with HMAs. Methods: This pilot study was designed to enroll 6 patients with relapsed/refractory intermediate or high-risk MDS and 6 patients with AML refractory to or relapsed to HMA treatment and who are deemed unfit for chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of sEphB4-HSA 15 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks in combination with the FDA-approved HMA most recently or currently being used for treatment (decitabine 20mg/m2 IV/1hr on days 1 to 5 every 28 days or azacitidine 75mg/m2 SC or IV on days 1 to 7 every 28 days). Patients were treated for as long as they were receiving clinical benefit up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was toxicity and tolerability of sEphB4-HSA in combination with HMA. Toxicity was assessed and graded after each cycle according to the CTCAE version 4. Tolerability was defined as the ability to complete two cycles of treatment without the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity. A secondary efficacy endpoint was to assess best overall response, based on the IWG Working Group Criteria for MDS and AML, during the first two cycles of treatment. Enrollment was stopped after 7 patients due to expiration of funding. Results: Three patients with intermediate-risk MDS were treated for a median duration of 6 cycles (2-12) and 4 patients with AML were treated for 2 cycles. Median age was 75.5 years (67.9-84.8) and 57.1% were male. HMA included azacitadine in 6 patients and decitabine in one patient. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. There were 8 grade 3/4 events attributed to HMA, which included: neutropenia (2), thrombocytopenia (3), and leukopenia (3). There were 3 grade 3/4 events attributed to sEphB4, which included: febrile neutropenia (1), leukopenia (1), and hypertension (1). Of the MDS patients, 2 had stable disease, 1 patient after 2 cycles and 1 patient after 4 cycles. One patient achieved a hematologic improvement-erythroid after 6 cycles. AML patients had no disease response. Reasons for treatment discontinuation were death (1), disease progression (2), patient's decision (1), physician's decision (2), and hospice (1). Notably, a comparison of bone marrow biopsies at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment demonstrated a decrease in MVD (Figure 1). Discussion: This pilot study found sEphB4 in combination with HMAs to be tolerable with no significant toxicity beyond that expected with HMA therapy and associated with potential clinical benefit in MDS patients. Improvement in abnormal bone marrow MVD may indicate a potential for sEphB4-HSA plus HMA therapy to alter the malignant microenvironment in MDS/AML. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Stiehl ◽  
Anthony D Ho ◽  
Anna Marciniak-Czochra

AbstractAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease. One reason for the heterogeneity may originate from inter-individual differences in the responses of leukemic cells to endogenous cytokines. On the basis of mathematical modeling, computer simulations and patient data, we have provided evidence that cytokine-independent leukemic cell proliferation is linked to early relapses and poor overall survival. Depending whether the model of cytokine-dependent or cytokine-independent leukemic cell proliferation fits to the clinical data, patients can be assigned to two groups that differ significantly with respect to overall survival. The modeling approach further enables us to identify parameter constellations that can explain unexpected responses of some patients to external cytokines such as blast crisis or remission without chemotherapy.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4189-4189
Author(s):  
Tsz-Kan Fung ◽  
Kin-Pong Fan ◽  
HaiXia Wan ◽  
Howard C.H. Chow ◽  
Anders S.Y. Wong ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4189 Background: The SOX (Sry-related HMG box) gene family is a group of transcription factors containing in common a High-Mobility-Group (HMG) box domain which shares more than 60% homology to that in Sry. SOX proteins are involved in diverse embryonic processes and recently Sox7 was shown to regulate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells during mouse development. In this study, we examined the expression, regulation and function of SOX7 in human acute myeloid leukemia with a view to understand its link to leukemogenesis. Method: Bone marrow (BM) or blood samples from patients with primary hematological malignancies, as well as cord blood obtained from normal Caesarian Sections were prospectively collected and mononuclear cells (MNC) fractions were obtained. Screening for SOX gene expression was performed by reverse-transcription polymer chain reaction (RT-PCR) and SOX7 expression in different experiments was further evaluated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Methylation of CpG islands around the sox7 transcription start site was studied by bisulphate DNA sequencing and methylation-specific PCR. Leukemic cell-lines (KG1, ML2, K562) and primary AML samples were treated with demethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5AdC). Cell proliferation of GFP or GFP-SOX7 expressing K562 cells was evaluated by SNARF-1 staining, cell-cycle analysis, 3H-thymidine incorporation and clonogenic assays. Apoptosis were evaluated by Annexin V/7-AAD assay. Canonical wnt activity of K562 cells expressing GFP or GFP-SOX7 was measured by TOP-FLASH dual luciferase assay. Result: The expression of 19 SOX genes was tested by RT-PCR in normal umbilical cord blood (UCB) as well as bone marrow or blood samples from patients with hematological malignancies. SOX7 was uniquely expressed in CD34+ cells from UCB (N=11) and most case of precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (17 out of 20 tested) and a ALL derived cell line Nalm-20, but not any case of acute myeloid leukemia (N=22), myelodysplastic syndrome (N=16) or chronic myelogenous leukemia (N=13). In myeloid leukemia cell lines (KG1, ML2, K562) and primary AML samples, but not Nalm-20, the transcription start site of SOX7 contained CpG islands which were heavily methylated. Treating myeloid leukemic cell lines with 5AdC induced SOX7 expression. Enforced expression of SOX7 in K562 cells by lentiviral transduction significantly reduced cell proliferation as shown by cell growth in cultures (SOX7: 6.5-fold increase; GFP: 21.7-fold increase on Day 9, N=2), SNARF-1 staining (SOX7: 57.5%; GFP: 78.0% of total cells divided twice, N=2), 3H-thymidine incorporation assay (SOX7: 3987 cpm; GFP: 5767 cpm, N=2) and colony-forming unit (SOX7: 262±99 per 1000 input cells; GFP: 464±145 per 100 input cells, p=0.055). It also induced cell cycle delay in S/G2/M phases (SOX7: 53.4±0.35%; GFP: 44.4±2.28%, p=0.029). Apoptosis was not affected. SOX7 expression in K562 cells significantly reduced canonical-wnt activity as measured by TOP-FLASH dual luciferase assay (SOX7: 30.0±7.1-fold to FOP-FLASH; GFP: 130±18.8-fold to FOP-FLASH, p=0.0081). Conclusion: SOX7 expression in AML was regulated by promoter hypermethylation and its forced expression in K562 cells reduced cell proliferation and inhibited the canonical wnt signaling pathway. The pathogenetic link between SOX7 gene silencing and AML leukemogenesis is being investigated in our laboratory. Acknowledgments The project was supported by a grant from the strategic Research Theme of cancer stem cells in the HKU. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S306
Author(s):  
Irina Panovska-Stavridis ◽  
Nevenka Ridova ◽  
Simona Stojanovska ◽  
Sanja Trajkova ◽  
Aleksandra Pivkova-Veljanovska ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document