Bortezomib-Containing Regimens for Multiple Myeloma Maintenance Therapy: a Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3473-3473
Author(s):  
Yucai Wang ◽  
Wenwen Zhang ◽  
Fang Yang ◽  
Xiaoxiang Guan ◽  
Neil Kothari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Cardiac Disorders ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib-containing regimens in maintenance therapy of multiple myeloma through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patients and methods: PubMed, Web of Science and ASH databases were searched for RCTs that investigated the treatment outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) of maintenance therapy with bortezomib-containing regimens in patients with multiple myeloma. Study endpoints included PFS, OS, and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for survival outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Comprehensive MetaAnalysis (v2). Results: Three RCTs comprising 1396 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with maintenance therapy without bortezomib and/or no maintenance therapy, bortezomib-based maintenance therapy regimens significantly prolonged PFS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.58 - 0.76, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.62 - 0.88, P = 0.001) in multiple myeloma patients. In patients who received high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), bortezomib-based maintenance therapy increased both PFS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.61 - 0.86, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.61 - 0.95, P = 0.016). For transplant ineligible patients, maintenance therapy with bortezomib-containing regimen also increased PFS (HR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.47 - 0.71, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52 - 0.92, P = 0.012). However, bortezomib-based maintenance therapy increased the risks of grade 3 or 4 adverse events including thrombocytopenia (RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.01 - 1.87, P = 0.046), infections (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02 - 1.64, P = 0.035), cardiac disorders (RR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.17 - 3.47, P = 0.012), and vascular events (RR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.15 - 1.45, P= 0.015). Conclusions: Bortezomib-based maintenance therapy results in significant improvement in PFS and OS in multiple myeloma patients, but may increase the risk of developing some grade 3 or 4 adverse events, such as thrombocytopenia, infections, cardiac disorders, and vascular events. Further studies are needed to corroborate the above findings given the limited data on proteasome inhibitor based maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Efficacy and Safety of Immunomodulatory Drugs in Multiple Myeloma Maintenance Therapy: Results of a Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3477-3477
Author(s):  
Yucai Wang ◽  
Fang Yang ◽  
Wenwen Zhang ◽  
Xiaoxiang Guan ◽  
Neil Kothari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in maintenance therapy of multiple myeloma through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patients and methods: PubMed, Web of Science, ASCO, ESMO and ASH databases were searched for RCTs that investigated the treatment outcomes (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS] and/or event-free survival [EFS] and/or time to progression [TTP]) of maintenance therapy with IMiDs in patients with multiple myeloma. Study endpoints included OS, PFS/EFS/TTP, and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for survival outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Comprehensive MetaAnalysis (v2). The random-effect model was utilized in view of clinical heterogeneity in the study population. Results: Eighteen RCTs comprising a total of 6562 patients were included in this meta-analysis. IMiDs used in the RCTs included thalidomide (14 trials) and lenalidomide (4 trials). Overall, IMiD-based maintenance therapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 - 0.99, P = 0.027) and PFS (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.60 - 0.68, P < 0.001). Notably, IMiDs maintenance therapy increased OS in the setting of ASCT but showed no OS prolongation without ASCT. On further stratification, thalidomide-based maintenance therapy demonstrated OS benefit only in the setting of ASCT, while lenalidomide-based maintenance therapy did not show OS benefit regardless of transplantation status. For PFS however, both thalidomide- and lenalidomide-based maintenance therapies demonstrated significant survival benefits, regardless of transplantation status (Table 1). IMiD-based maintenance therapy increased the risk of developing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (RR = 3.04, 95% CI = 2.49 - 3.70, P < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (RR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.90 - 3.79, P < 0.001), anemia (RR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.23 - 3.15, P = 0.005), infection (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.22 - 1.92, P < 0.001), fatigue (HR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.24 - 2.36, P = 0.001), constipation (RR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.15 - 3.62, P = 0.015), and peripheral neuropathy (RR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.20 - 3.39, P = 0.008). Conclusions: IMiD-based maintenance therapy results in significant improvement in OS and PFS in multiple myeloma patients but increased the risk of developing some grade 3 or 4 adverse events. While thalidomide-containing maintenance therapy regimens showed OS benefits in the setting of ASCT, lenalidomide-containing maintenance therapy did not prolong OS regardless of transplantation status. Both thalidomide- and lenalidomide-based maintenance therapies increased PFS in multiple myeloma patients independent of transplantation status. When more data on lenalidomide and the newer agent pomalidomide become available, further analysis will be warranted to analyze the efficacy and safety of IMiDs in multiple myeloma maintenance therapy. Table 1. Effects of IMiD-based maintenance therapy on OS and PFS in multiple myeloma patients IMiD ASCT status Survival Number of trials HR 95% CI P value Thalidomide/Lenalidomide combined OS 18 0.91 0.84 - 0.99 0.027 with ASCT OS 10 0.88 0.78 - 0.99 0.036 without ASCT OS 9 0.94 0.83 - 1.06 0.299 Thalidomide combined OS 14 0.92 0.84 - 1.01 0.090 with ASCT OS 8 0.87 0.77 - 1.00 0.049 without ASCT OS 7 0.97 0.85 - 1.10 0.640 Lenalidomide combined OS 4 0.84 0.67 - 1.04 0.102 with ASCT OS 2 0.89 0.66 - 1.20 0.457 without ASCT OS 2 0.78 0.57 - 1.06 0.114 Thalidomide/Lenalidomide combined PFS 17 0.63 0.60 -0.68 < 0.001 with ASCT PFS 9 0.62 0.57 - 0.67 < 0.001 without ASCT PFS 9 0.66 0.60 - 0.73 < 0.001 Thalidomide combined PFS 13 0.67 0.63 - 0.72 < 0.001 with ASCT PFS 7 0.66 0.60 - 0.72 < 0.001 without ASCT PFS 7 0.69 0.62 -0.77 < 0.001 Lenalidomide combined PFS 4 0.50 0.43 - 0.58 < 0.001 with ASCT PFS 2 0.49 0.41 - 0.58 < 0.001 without ASCT PFS 2 0.52 0.40 - 0.67 < 0.001 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Lenalidomide Compared to Ixazomib Maintenance in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3776-3776
Author(s):  
Eunice Lai ◽  
Yu Yang Soon ◽  
Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin Lee ◽  
Shi Yin Wong ◽  
Cinnie Yentia Soekojo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Maintenance Strategies

Abstract Background Maintenance therapy is considered a standard of care in transplant eligible (TE) and non transplant eligible (NTE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). While immunomodulators (IMID) and proteasome inhibitors (PI) have been proposed as maintenance therapy options, there are no randomised trials (RCTs) directly comparing these agents in the maintenance setting. The IMID lenalidomide (Len) and the PI ixazomib (Ixa) have been compared against placebo as maintenance strategies in NDMM. We present a network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of Len and Ixa maintenance therapies in NDMM. Methods We searched various biomedical databases for eligible studies evaluating Len or Ixa against placebo/ observation as maintenance therapy in patients with NDMM from date of inception through November 2020. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes include overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AE). The Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2.0 was used to assess trial quality. A Bayesian NMA model was used to assess the relative effects of competing treatments on PFS and OS outcomes. Adverse events were assessed using the synthesis without meta-analysis (SWIM) approach due to variability in the toxicity scoring criteria. The GRADE approach was used to rate the certainty of the evidence. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021226157. Results We identified eight studies including 3229 transplant eligible (TE) and 1689 non transplant eligible (NTE) patients. All studies were judged to have low risk of bias. Len but not Ixa was associated with statistically significant improvement in PFS when compared to placebo in TE (Len: Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.46, 95% Credible Interval (CrI) 0.35-0.56, high certainty; Ixa: HR 0.72, 95% CrI 0.46-1.13, moderate certainty) and NTE (Len: HR 0.46, 95% CrI 0.29-0.75, high certainty; Ixa: HR 0.69, 95% CrI 0.43-1.18, moderate certainty). Bayesian modelling demonstrated a 97% and 93% probability that Len resulted in superior PFS compared to Ixa in TE and NTE patients respectively. Both Len and Ixa were not associated with statistically significant improvement in OS compared to placebo in TE and NTE patients. There was no significant effect modification on the effect of Len vs placebo and Ixa vs placebo by cytogenetics status, use of proteasome inhibitors for induction or duration of maintenance therapies for PFS and/or OS outcomes. Len were judged to have a higher incidence of second malignancies and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia than Ixa while Ixa was judged to have a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia than Len. Conclusions Maintenance therapy with Len may provide a larger PFS benefit than Ixa regardless of type of induction therapy and cytogenetic risk in patients with NDDM. The differing toxicity profile of these agents is also an important consideration for treatment decisions. RCTs directly comparing these maintenance strategies are warranted. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ooi: Jansen: Honoraria; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Chng: Sanofi: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Bortezomib-Based Consolidation/Maintenance Therapy for Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3293-3293
Author(s):  
Shijia Zhang ◽  
Yucai Wang ◽  
Yvonne Datta ◽  
Veronika Bachanova ◽  
Sarah Cooley
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that can lead to cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Bortezomib-based regimens are widely used as induction therapy of multiple myeloma (MM). Unlike lenalidomide (an immunomodulatory drug), the role of bortezomib in the consolidation and maintenance therapy of multiple myeloma is less clear. This study aims to examine the efficacy and safety of bortezomib-based regimens as consolidation/maintenance therapy in MM patients following induction therapy with or without autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Methods: PubMed, ASH, and ASCO databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RTC) of bortezomib-based regimens (either single-agent or combination) as consolidation/maintenance therapy for MM patients through July 2018. Study endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AE). Pooled hazard ratios (HR) for survival outcomes and relative risks (RR) for dichotomous data with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with a random effect model using MedCalc (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). For studies that did not report HRs for survival outcomes but provided graphical survival curves, the log HRs and variances were estimated based on the method by Parmar et al (Stat Med 1998; 17: 2815-2834). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic of inconsistency, with statistically significant heterogeneity defined as I2 > 50% or p-value < 0.1. Results: Eight randomized controlled trials (7 phase III, 1 phase II; 2 were published in a single article) were identified. Bortezomib-based regimens were administered as consolidation treatment in 5 RTCs and maintenance therapy in 3 RTCs, following induction therapy +/- ASCT. A total of 2439 patients were included: 1154 patients received bortezomib-based regimens, and 1285 patients received non-bortezomib-based regimens or observation. Two RCTs (1 for consolidation, 1 for maintenance) did not provide HRs, which were estimated as described as above. Pooled data from the 8 RCTs showed that bortezomib-based consolidation/maintenance therapy improved progression-free survival (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.64-0.79, P < 0.001; I2 = 6.61%) and overall survival (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.94, P = 0.005; I2 = 0%) compared to observation or regimens without bortezomib. When the 2 RCTs that did not report HRs were excluded from the meta-analysis, it did not alter the favorable outcome of bortezomib-based consolidation/maintenance therapy: PFS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60-0.82, P < 0.001; I2 = 40.54%) and OS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.91, P = 0.002; I2 = 0%). The PFS benefit was maintained in a subgroup analysis by the setting of treatment (consolidation, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.85, P < 0.001; I2 = 0%, maintenance, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.0.86, P = 0.001; I2 = 55.63%). Bortezomib-based therapy prolonged OS in the maintenance setting (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.86, P < 0.001; I2 = 0%) but not in the consolidation setting (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.77-1.33, P = 0.935; I2 = 0%). Regarding safety, bortezomib-based consolidation/maintenance therapy significantly increased the risk of grade 3 or 4 peripheral sensory neuropathy and neuralgia (RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.11-3.95, p = 0.022; I2 = 52.64%) compared to observation or regimens without bortezomib. There was a trend toward increased rates of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.95-2.52, p = 0.08; I2 = 21.67%), GI symptoms (RR 2.54, 95% CI 0.63-10.25, p = 0.19; I2 = 76.72%), vascular events (RR 1.90, 95% CI 0.80-4.53, p = 0.15; I2 = 0.00%), and fatigue (RR 2.10, 95% CI 0.83-5.30, p = 0.12; I2 = 0.00%) with bortezomib-based consolidation/maintenance, but these did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Bortezomib-based consolidation/maintenance significantly improves PFS and OS in MM patients following induction therapy +/- ASCT. The OS benefit appears to be limited to the maintenance setting based on a subgroup analysis. Bortezomib-based regimen increases the risk of grade 3 or 4 peripheral sensory neuropathy and neuralgia. Disclosures Bachanova: Gamida Cell: Research Funding; GT Biopharma: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab Based Regimens for Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3292-3292
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abu Zar ◽  
Ahmad Kamal ◽  
Ali Younas Khan ◽  
Saad Ullah Malik ◽  
Mustafa Nadeem Malik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Drug Regimen ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Daratumumab is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 that has been approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). We performed a meta-analysis of trials with daratumumab to find its efficacy and safety. Materials and Methods: Extensive literature search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov on 5/07/2018 identified a total of 1596 articles. Fourteen articles (n = 1439) met the inclusion criteria, eleven in the relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and three in the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) group (Table 1). A meta-analysis was performed using STATA version 15 and inter study heterogeneity was calculated using I² statistic. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was 69% (95% CI: 51-84%) and very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) was 40% (95% CI: 22-60%) in RRMM patients. In a subgroup analysis with three, two and single drug regimen, ORR was 85% (95% CI: 77-92%), 30% (95% CI: 21-40%) and 31% (95% CI: 24-39%) respectively in RRMM patients. The hazard ratio (HR) for progression free survival (PFS) with daratumumab based regimens was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.26-0.45) as compared to non-daratumumab based regimens in two randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The most effective regimen, in terms of PFS for RRMM patients with a median of a single previous line of therapy was daratumumab with lenalidomide with dexamethasone (24-months PFS rate: 68%) in the POLLUX trial (Dimopoulos et al., 2017). The ORR was 97% (95% CI: 92-100%) and ≥VGPR rate was 64% (95% CI: 44-83%) in NDMM patients (Figure 1). In the only available RCT for NDMM patients, the HR for PFS was 0.50 (95% CI: 0.38-0.65) (Mateos et al., 2017). Incidence of neutropenia was 30% (95% CI: 16-46%) and thrombocytopenia was 25% (95% CI: 15-37%). While the incidence of anemia was 17% (95% CI: 13-21%). Incidence of ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic treatment emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) were as follows: pneumonia (11.3-12%), hypertension (8-12%) and fatigue (4-12.5%). In daratumumab and non-daratumumab based regimens ≥ grade 3 infusions related reactions occurred in 5% of the patients. In the three RCTs, these hematologic (≥ grade 3) TEAEs were comparable as neutropenia occurred in 36.86% vs 29.57%, thrombocytopenia in 30% vs 29% and anemia in 16.67% vs 19% respectively. Patients on daratumumab based regimens who discontinued treatment due to TEAEs were 8.56% vs 9.93% on non-daratumumab based regimens in the three RCTs which shows that most of the treatment discontinuations was due to other drugs in the regimen. Conclusion: Our results suggest that daratumumab containing regimen is more effective than non-daratumumab based regimens for RRMM and NDMM patients. Three drug daratumumab based regimens are more effective when compared to two drug or daratumumab monotherapy regimens. The safety profile of daratumumab is favorable, which makes it an extremely useful drug. Despite limited data in NDMM patients, daratumumab based regimens appear to be highly effective. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to compare various daratumumab based regimens. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous Administration of Bortezomib in Combination with Thalidomide and Dexamethasone for Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenghao Wu ◽  
Cuiping Zheng ◽  
Songyan Chen ◽  
Xiaoping Cai ◽  
Yuejian Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Subcutaneous Administration ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Other ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Objective. To investigate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients with the therapy of subcutaneous (subQ) administration of bortezomib and dexamethasone plus thalidomide (VTD) regimen.Methods. A total of 60 newly diagnosed MM patients were analyzed. 30 patients received improved VTD regimen (improved VTD group) with the subQ injection of bortezomib and the other 30 patients received conventional VTD regimen (VTD group).The efficacy and safety of two groups were analyzed retrospectively.Results. The overall remission (OR) after eight cycles of treatment was 73.3% in the VTD group and 76.7% in the improved VTD group (P>0.05). No significant differences in time to 1-year estimate of overall survival (72% versus 75%,P=0.848) and progression-free survival (median 22 months versus 25 months;P=0.725) between two groups. The main toxicities related to therapy were leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, fatigue, and renal and urinary disorders. Grade 3 and higher adverse events were significantly less common in the improved VTD group (50%) than VTD group (80%,P=0.015).Conclusions. The improved VTD regimen by changing bortezomib from intravenous administration to subcutaneous injection has noninferior efficacy to standard VTD regimen, with an improved safety profile and reduced adverse events.

Incidence of Febrile Episodes During Stem Cells Mobilization After High Dose Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy and G-CSF (filgrastim or lenograstim) Administration in Multiple Myeloma Patients: Preliminary Final Results.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4560-4560
Author(s):  
Enrico Orciuolo ◽  
Gabriele Buda ◽  
Emerenziana Marturano ◽  
Elisa Mauro ◽  
Giuseppe Milone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Absolute Count ◽  
Functional Block ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Febrile Episodes

Abstract Abstract 4560 Introduction The G-CSF, primary regulator of granulopoiesis, has shown its efficacy in reducing duration of neutropenia after chemotherapy or myelosuppressive therapy. In these situations G-CSF, accelerating the granulocytous reconstitution, may enable a significant reduction of the incidence, duration and severity of infection. Commercially formulations of rHu-G-CSF include lenograstim, a glycosylated form, and filgrastim, a non-glycosylated form. Glycosylation of the molecule contribute to pharmacokynetis advantages and to higher affinity to specific receptor. Additionally, lenograstim exposed neutrophils maintain unchanged all their functions in vitro, while filgrastim exposed neutrophils present functional defects due to higher adhesivity, cytoscheletric alterations and a more immature phenotype. Aim On these bases, we hypotized that lenograstim may prevent febrile episodes (FE) and reduce their lasting in patients with chemotherapy derived neutropenia more efficiently than filgrastim. Primary endpoint is the incidence of FE (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00932217). Patients and methods starting from April 2005, 180 multiple myeloma patients achieving high dose cyclophosphamide for stem cells mobilization were enrolled in 11 Italian Centers. Treatment plan consisted in: high dose cyclophosphamide (3 or 4 g/sqm) on day 1, G-CSF (random 1:1 on the base of a generated random list: filgrastim or lenograstim) 30 MU/day from day +4 to +9, 60 MU/day from day +10 to the achievement of an optimal CD34+ cell count for staminoapheresis. FE, significant if equal or higher than 38 °C for at least 2 different determinations, were recorded till day +30. Results 176 of 180 patients received scheduled treatment and are eligible for final analyses. All 176 patients underwent post-chemo grade 4 neutropenia and G-CSF was administered starting from day +4. FE were recorded in 26 pts, 16 in the filgrastim arm (89 total patients) and 10 in the lenograstim arm (87 total patients). The global fever incidence was 14.77%, 17.98% with filgrastim and 11.49% with lenograstim. However, to demonstrate functional block of filgrastim exposed neutrophils, FE have been related to neutrophil absolute count. Related to the neutropenia grade, 8 FE are recorded with filgrastim (8.99%) and 1 FE with lenograstim (1.15%) with absolute neutrophil count >500/μL (grade 3) (chi square test with Yates' correction: p=0.0436); this difference is still evident when neutrophils are >1000/μL (grade 2), with 7 episodes with filgrastim (7.87%) versus 1 (1.15%) with lenograstim. Conclusions Lenograstim is associated with a reduced global incidence of FE in multiple myeloma patients undergoing to high dose cyclophosphamide and stem cells mobilization when compared to filgrastim. Additionally, excluding the time frame when neutrophils are not yet recovered (neutrophils <500/μL; grade 4 neutropenia) and G-CSF effects may not be demonstrated, filgrastim treated patients present, when compared to lenograstim treated patients, an higher FE incidence at neutrophil absolute count recovery (both with grade 3 and grade 2 neutropenia), confirming the functional block of filgrastim exposed neutrophils described in vitro. On the contrary, lenograstim allows to recovery normally functional neutrophils as demonstrated by the very low incidence of FE (1.15% with neutrophils >500/μL) in treated patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Lenalidomide Consolidation Followed by Maintenance After Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma Decreases Thymic Output and Terminally Differentiated CD4 and CD8 T Cells but Increases Treg

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4046-4046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Clave ◽  
Corinne Douay ◽  
Tereza Coman ◽  
Marc Busson ◽  
Caroline Bompoint ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Immune Surveillance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Post Transplantation

Abstract Abstract 4046 Treatment with lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug, increases the time to progression in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. However, due to its pleiotropic effect, it is not known whether the efficacy of this drug is due only to direct tumor toxicity or also to immunomodulatory effects. We assessed in vivo the changes in T-cell reconstitution induced by lenalidomide consolidation and maintenance treatment following autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in a cohort of multiple myeloma patients. Twenty-nine newly diagnosed myeloma patients were treated with the induction combination bortezomib plus dex followed by high dose melphalan (140–200 mg/m2) and ASCT. A first group of 11 patients were treated with lenalidomide consolidation initiated 3 to 6 months post transplantation: 25 mg/day, days 1–21 of a 28 day cycle for 2 months, followed by maintenance (10 mg/day) until disease progression. This group was compared with the 18 patients who did not receive any treatment after ASCT. Blood samples were collected at diagnosis, before the transplant and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months after ASCT. Thymic function was assessed by real-time PCR quantification of T cell receptor excision circles (sjTREC) and percentages and absolute counts of T lymphocyte subpopulations were determined by multicolor flow cytometry. Statistics were performed using the Log-Rank or Mann-Whitney test. The two cohorts had similar baseline characteristics and all 29 patients were in remission after ASCT. With a median follow-up of 4 years, progression-free survival (PFS) was superior with lenalidomide treatment (69% vs 36%, p=0.05) while overall survival (OS) was similar (82% vs 75%, p=0.5). Lenalidomide treatment induced a progressive decrease in sjTREC (median at 18 months, 0.25/μL vs 1.61/μL, p<0.05) and a decrease in the percentages and absolute counts of CD4+ and CD8+ CD45RA+CCR7- effector terminal T cell subpopulations (median at 18 months, 3.2/μL vs 17.6/μL, p<0.05 for CD4+CD45RA+CCR7- and 109/μL vs 345/μL, p<0.05 for CD8+CD45RA+CCR7-). Conversely, lenalidomide treated patients displayed an increase in CD4+CD25+CD127-/low Treg populations, in both percentage and absolute count (median 13% vs 8 %, p<0.05 and 48.9/μL vs 29.3/μL, p<0.05, respectively). No correlation was found with documented infections, relapse or survival. We confirm an increase in PFS with lenalidomide consolidation/maintenance following ASCT. However, our data also suggest that in myeloma patients, the effect of lenalidomide on the myeloma tumor may not be T cell mediated and this treatment may have a negative impact on the T cell immune surveillance. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Prevalence of Oligoclonal Bands in Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Achieved Better Results Than Very Good Partial Response after Treatment with Standard or High Doses Chemotherapy-Final Analysis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4210-4210
Author(s):  
Luiza soares Vieira ◽  
Edvan de queiroz Crusoe ◽  
Manuella de S. Sampaio Almeida ◽  
Lais Sousa ◽  
ana Lucia Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Oligoclonal Bands ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Good Partial Response

Abstract Introduction - Oligoclonal bands (OB) are monoclonal proteins distinct from those originally identified in the multiple myeloma (MM) diagnosis. Some authors consider that appearance of these bands confers a better prognosis and may be linked to immune reconstitution. There is no data of the exact prevalence of OB emergence in patients with very good partial response (VGPR) or better after different treatment schedules. Objectives - To determine the prevalence of OB in MM patients treated with or without high-dose chemotherapy that obtained at least VGPR and its prognostic value. Methods- This is a retrospective and prospective cohort study. Data were collected from records of patients that achieved at least VGPR to identify the OB emergence. Subsequently, new sample collections from the positive patients were made in order to monitor the progress and duration of the maintenance of these bands. Results-Median follow-up was 42m and 101 patients were included. Median age was 58y (29-87) and 55% were male. IgG was the most frequent component (60%). Durie-Salmon IIIA/B was identified in 92% of the population; ISS was 33% in stage I, 30% in stage II, and 31% in stage III. The prevalence of OB identified by SPE and IF was 50.5% (51 cases), with a higher prevalence in those who underwent transplantation and those who achieved complete response (p=0.00139 and p=0.0368, respectively). Progression free survival (PFS) was longer in the OB group (45.4m x 34.7m p = 0.0075). Conclusion - The OB prevalence in this population was 50.5% and oligoclonality resulted in a longer PFS. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Efficacy and Safety of Bortezomib Based Regimens Retreatment in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from a Retrospective Study.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5387-5387
Author(s):  
Wenjun Wu ◽  
Gaofeng Zheng ◽  
Xiaoyan Han ◽  
Yi Zhao ◽  
Donghua He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib retreatment in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, who previously responded to bortezomib. Methods: This retrospective observational study included data from 45 patients and evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib based retreatment in these patients, who had achieved at least a partial response (PR) on initial bortezomib therapy in our hospital from May 2006 to May 2013. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was 71.2%, among them 9% patients achieved CR, 11.1% patients achieved very good partial response (VGPR), 51.1% patients achieved PR. All patients were divided into 3 groups according to the response of initial bortezomib therapy, including CR group, VGPR group and PR group. After bortezomib retreatment, the ORR of the 3 groups was 76.9%, 75% and 62.5%, respectively. According to the response of bortezomib retreatment, the patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 who at least achieved PR, group 2 who showed no response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) after bortezomib retreatment for group 1 and 2 was 9( 95% confidence interval 7.947~10.051) and 10 (95% confidence interval 8.381∼11.619) months, respectively (P>0.05), while the median overall survival (OS) after bortezomib retreatment was 71 (95% confidence interval 66.694∼75.306)) and 37 (95% confidence interval 1-28) months, respectively (P<0.05). In patients with bortezomib retreatment had different degrees of adverse events (AE) , the most AE for grade 1~2. The most common grade ≥3 AE was thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and anemia. The incidence rate of grade ≥3 AE peripheral neuropathy bortezomib was 15%. Conclusion: Bortezomib based regimens retreatment was effective and tolerable in relapsed MM patients, who had achieved at least a partial response (PR) on initial therapy. The incidence rate of AE was not significantly increased. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Maintenance Therapy for Myeloma: How Much, How Long, and at What Cost?

2012 ◽  
pp. 515-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Attal ◽  
Murielle Roussel
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Dose Therapy

Overview: Maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma has been under investigation for more than 3 decades and has been without evidence of clear advantage in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) until the mid-2000s. Neither conventional chemotherapy, prednisone, nor interferon-based maintenance regimens offered any benefit after conventional or high-dose therapy. Thalidomide was the first drug, mainly given as maintenance after high dose therapy, to demonstrate clinical benefits in terms of PFS and, in some studies, of overall survival (OS). The role of other novel agents such as lenalidomide and bortezomib as maintenance therapy is emerging. Lenalidomide has been shown to reduce the risk of relapse with longer follow-up needed to see if this will translate into a survival benefit. At present, a number of key questions remain unanswered. What are the optimal dose and duration of those treatments? Is the risk of toxicity and second primary malignancies acceptable? Will the disease be more aggressive at time of relapse? Is the clinical benefit predicted by initial prognostic factors and response to previous therapy? Does maintenance therapy work by further eradication of minimal residual disease or by immunological control of the malignant clone? Ongoing randomized trials are evaluating lenalidomide and bortezomib, both in the transplant and nontransplant settings, to better define the role of these drugs as maintenance in multiple myeloma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document