Efficacy and Safety of Bortezomib Based Regimens Retreatment in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from a Retrospective Study.

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib retreatment in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, who previously responded to bortezomib. Methods: This retrospective observational study included data from 45 patients and evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib based retreatment in these patients, who had achieved at least a partial response (PR) on initial bortezomib therapy in our hospital from May 2006 to May 2013. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was 71.2%, among them 9% patients achieved CR, 11.1% patients achieved very good partial response (VGPR), 51.1% patients achieved PR. All patients were divided into 3 groups according to the response of initial bortezomib therapy, including CR group, VGPR group and PR group. After bortezomib retreatment, the ORR of the 3 groups was 76.9%, 75% and 62.5%, respectively. According to the response of bortezomib retreatment, the patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 who at least achieved PR, group 2 who showed no response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) after bortezomib retreatment for group 1 and 2 was 9( 95% confidence interval 7.947~10.051) and 10 (95% confidence interval 8.381∼11.619) months, respectively (P>0.05), while the median overall survival (OS) after bortezomib retreatment was 71 (95% confidence interval 66.694∼75.306)) and 37 (95% confidence interval 1-28) months, respectively (P<0.05). In patients with bortezomib retreatment had different degrees of adverse events (AE) , the most AE for grade 1~2. The most common grade ≥3 AE was thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and anemia. The incidence rate of grade ≥3 AE peripheral neuropathy bortezomib was 15%. Conclusion: Bortezomib based regimens retreatment was effective and tolerable in relapsed MM patients, who had achieved at least a partial response (PR) on initial therapy. The incidence rate of AE was not significantly increased. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab Based Regimens for Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-110580 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3292-3292

Author(s):

Muhammad Abu Zar ◽

Ahmad Kamal ◽

Ali Younas Khan ◽

Saad Ullah Malik ◽

Mustafa Nadeem Malik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Drug Regimen ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Extensive Literature ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Line Of Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Daratumumab is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 that has been approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). We performed a meta-analysis of trials with daratumumab to find its efficacy and safety. Materials and Methods: Extensive literature search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov on 5/07/2018 identified a total of 1596 articles. Fourteen articles (n = 1439) met the inclusion criteria, eleven in the relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and three in the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) group (Table 1). A meta-analysis was performed using STATA version 15 and inter study heterogeneity was calculated using I² statistic. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was 69% (95% CI: 51-84%) and very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) was 40% (95% CI: 22-60%) in RRMM patients. In a subgroup analysis with three, two and single drug regimen, ORR was 85% (95% CI: 77-92%), 30% (95% CI: 21-40%) and 31% (95% CI: 24-39%) respectively in RRMM patients. The hazard ratio (HR) for progression free survival (PFS) with daratumumab based regimens was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.26-0.45) as compared to non-daratumumab based regimens in two randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The most effective regimen, in terms of PFS for RRMM patients with a median of a single previous line of therapy was daratumumab with lenalidomide with dexamethasone (24-months PFS rate: 68%) in the POLLUX trial (Dimopoulos et al., 2017). The ORR was 97% (95% CI: 92-100%) and ≥VGPR rate was 64% (95% CI: 44-83%) in NDMM patients (Figure 1). In the only available RCT for NDMM patients, the HR for PFS was 0.50 (95% CI: 0.38-0.65) (Mateos et al., 2017). Incidence of neutropenia was 30% (95% CI: 16-46%) and thrombocytopenia was 25% (95% CI: 15-37%). While the incidence of anemia was 17% (95% CI: 13-21%). Incidence of ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic treatment emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) were as follows: pneumonia (11.3-12%), hypertension (8-12%) and fatigue (4-12.5%). In daratumumab and non-daratumumab based regimens ≥ grade 3 infusions related reactions occurred in 5% of the patients. In the three RCTs, these hematologic (≥ grade 3) TEAEs were comparable as neutropenia occurred in 36.86% vs 29.57%, thrombocytopenia in 30% vs 29% and anemia in 16.67% vs 19% respectively. Patients on daratumumab based regimens who discontinued treatment due to TEAEs were 8.56% vs 9.93% on non-daratumumab based regimens in the three RCTs which shows that most of the treatment discontinuations was due to other drugs in the regimen. Conclusion: Our results suggest that daratumumab containing regimen is more effective than non-daratumumab based regimens for RRMM and NDMM patients. Three drug daratumumab based regimens are more effective when compared to two drug or daratumumab monotherapy regimens. The safety profile of daratumumab is favorable, which makes it an extremely useful drug. Despite limited data in NDMM patients, daratumumab based regimens appear to be highly effective. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to compare various daratumumab based regimens. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Subcutaneous Administration of Bortezomib in Combination with Thalidomide and Dexamethasone for Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2015/927105 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 2015 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Shenghao Wu ◽

Cuiping Zheng ◽

Songyan Chen ◽

Xiaoping Cai ◽

Yuejian Shi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Subcutaneous Administration ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

The Other ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3

Objective. To investigate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients with the therapy of subcutaneous (subQ) administration of bortezomib and dexamethasone plus thalidomide (VTD) regimen.Methods. A total of 60 newly diagnosed MM patients were analyzed. 30 patients received improved VTD regimen (improved VTD group) with the subQ injection of bortezomib and the other 30 patients received conventional VTD regimen (VTD group).The efficacy and safety of two groups were analyzed retrospectively.Results. The overall remission (OR) after eight cycles of treatment was 73.3% in the VTD group and 76.7% in the improved VTD group (P>0.05). No significant differences in time to 1-year estimate of overall survival (72% versus 75%,P=0.848) and progression-free survival (median 22 months versus 25 months;P=0.725) between two groups. The main toxicities related to therapy were leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, fatigue, and renal and urinary disorders. Grade 3 and higher adverse events were significantly less common in the improved VTD group (50%) than VTD group (80%,P=0.015).Conclusions. The improved VTD regimen by changing bortezomib from intravenous administration to subcutaneous injection has noninferior efficacy to standard VTD regimen, with an improved safety profile and reduced adverse events.

Download Full-text

The Efficacy and Safety of Immunomodulatory Drugs in Multiple Myeloma Maintenance Therapy: Results of a Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3477.3477 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3477-3477

Author(s):

Yucai Wang ◽

Fang Yang ◽

Wenwen Zhang ◽

Xiaoxiang Guan ◽

Neil Kothari ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efﬁcacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in maintenance therapy of multiple myeloma through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patients and methods: PubMed, Web of Science, ASCO, ESMO and ASH databases were searched for RCTs that investigated the treatment outcomes (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS] and/or event-free survival [EFS] and/or time to progression [TTP]) of maintenance therapy with IMiDs in patients with multiple myeloma. Study endpoints included OS, PFS/EFS/TTP, and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for survival outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Comprehensive MetaAnalysis (v2). The random-effect model was utilized in view of clinical heterogeneity in the study population. Results: Eighteen RCTs comprising a total of 6562 patients were included in this meta-analysis. IMiDs used in the RCTs included thalidomide (14 trials) and lenalidomide (4 trials). Overall, IMiD-based maintenance therapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 - 0.99, P = 0.027) and PFS (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.60 - 0.68, P < 0.001). Notably, IMiDs maintenance therapy increased OS in the setting of ASCT but showed no OS prolongation without ASCT. On further stratification, thalidomide-based maintenance therapy demonstrated OS benefit only in the setting of ASCT, while lenalidomide-based maintenance therapy did not show OS benefit regardless of transplantation status. For PFS however, both thalidomide- and lenalidomide-based maintenance therapies demonstrated significant survival benefits, regardless of transplantation status (Table 1). IMiD-based maintenance therapy increased the risk of developing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (RR = 3.04, 95% CI = 2.49 - 3.70, P < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (RR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.90 - 3.79, P < 0.001), anemia (RR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.23 - 3.15, P = 0.005), infection (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.22 - 1.92, P < 0.001), fatigue (HR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.24 - 2.36, P = 0.001), constipation (RR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.15 - 3.62, P = 0.015), and peripheral neuropathy (RR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.20 - 3.39, P = 0.008). Conclusions: IMiD-based maintenance therapy results in signiﬁcant improvement in OS and PFS in multiple myeloma patients but increased the risk of developing some grade 3 or 4 adverse events. While thalidomide-containing maintenance therapy regimens showed OS benefits in the setting of ASCT, lenalidomide-containing maintenance therapy did not prolong OS regardless of transplantation status. Both thalidomide- and lenalidomide-based maintenance therapies increased PFS in multiple myeloma patients independent of transplantation status. When more data on lenalidomide and the newer agent pomalidomide become available, further analysis will be warranted to analyze the efficacy and safety of IMiDs in multiple myeloma maintenance therapy. Table 1. Effects of IMiD-based maintenance therapy on OS and PFS in multiple myeloma patients IMiD ASCT status Survival Number of trials HR 95% CI P value Thalidomide/Lenalidomide combined OS 18 0.91 0.84 - 0.99 0.027 with ASCT OS 10 0.88 0.78 - 0.99 0.036 without ASCT OS 9 0.94 0.83 - 1.06 0.299 Thalidomide combined OS 14 0.92 0.84 - 1.01 0.090 with ASCT OS 8 0.87 0.77 - 1.00 0.049 without ASCT OS 7 0.97 0.85 - 1.10 0.640 Lenalidomide combined OS 4 0.84 0.67 - 1.04 0.102 with ASCT OS 2 0.89 0.66 - 1.20 0.457 without ASCT OS 2 0.78 0.57 - 1.06 0.114 Thalidomide/Lenalidomide combined PFS 17 0.63 0.60 -0.68 < 0.001 with ASCT PFS 9 0.62 0.57 - 0.67 < 0.001 without ASCT PFS 9 0.66 0.60 - 0.73 < 0.001 Thalidomide combined PFS 13 0.67 0.63 - 0.72 < 0.001 with ASCT PFS 7 0.66 0.60 - 0.72 < 0.001 without ASCT PFS 7 0.69 0.62 -0.77 < 0.001 Lenalidomide combined PFS 4 0.50 0.43 - 0.58 < 0.001 with ASCT PFS 2 0.49 0.41 - 0.58 < 0.001 without ASCT PFS 2 0.52 0.40 - 0.67 < 0.001 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Prevalence of Oligoclonal Bands in Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Achieved Better Results Than Very Good Partial Response after Treatment with Standard or High Doses Chemotherapy-Final Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4210.4210 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4210-4210

Author(s):

Luiza soares Vieira ◽

Edvan de queiroz Crusoe ◽

Manuella de S. Sampaio Almeida ◽

Lais Sousa ◽

ana Lucia Perez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Final Analysis ◽

Complete Response ◽

High Dose Chemotherapy ◽

Oligoclonal Bands ◽

High Dose ◽

Good Partial Response

Abstract Introduction - Oligoclonal bands (OB) are monoclonal proteins distinct from those originally identified in the multiple myeloma (MM) diagnosis. Some authors consider that appearance of these bands confers a better prognosis and may be linked to immune reconstitution. There is no data of the exact prevalence of OB emergence in patients with very good partial response (VGPR) or better after different treatment schedules. Objectives - To determine the prevalence of OB in MM patients treated with or without high-dose chemotherapy that obtained at least VGPR and its prognostic value. Methods- This is a retrospective and prospective cohort study. Data were collected from records of patients that achieved at least VGPR to identify the OB emergence. Subsequently, new sample collections from the positive patients were made in order to monitor the progress and duration of the maintenance of these bands. Results-Median follow-up was 42m and 101 patients were included. Median age was 58y (29-87) and 55% were male. IgG was the most frequent component (60%). Durie-Salmon IIIA/B was identified in 92% of the population; ISS was 33% in stage I, 30% in stage II, and 31% in stage III. The prevalence of OB identified by SPE and IF was 50.5% (51 cases), with a higher prevalence in those who underwent transplantation and those who achieved complete response (p=0.00139 and p=0.0368, respectively). Progression free survival (PFS) was longer in the OB group (45.4m x 34.7m p = 0.0075). Conclusion - The OB prevalence in this population was 50.5% and oligoclonality resulted in a longer PFS. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

The impact of kidney function on the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients: CORE-URO-01 study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e16063 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e16063-e16063

Author(s):

Maria Giuseppa Vitale ◽

Cristina Masini ◽

Giuseppe Procopio ◽

Ugo De Giorgi ◽

Sebastiano Buti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Side Effects ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Therapy Initiation ◽

Frequent Monitoring ◽

Group 2 ◽

Grade 3 ◽

The Impact ◽

Group 1

e16063 Background: Pazopanibhas been approved for treatment of patients (pts) with mRCC based on the prospective randomized trial that enrolled only pts with adequate renal parameters. There are no data on the toxicity profile and efficacy of pazopanib in pts with renal insufficiency (RI).The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of renal function on treatment outcomes in pts treated with pazopanib for mRCC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of the mRCC pts treated with pazopanib with respect to renal function in eleven Italian institutions from January 2010 to June 2016. Baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula at the time of therapy initiation. Pts with MDRD < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group 1) were compared with pts with MDRD ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2(group 2) in terms of response rates, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and side effects. Results: One hundred and twenty-ninepts with mRCC were included in this study: 70 pts in group 1 and 59 pts in group 2. 67% of pts were male, median age was 66 years (34-83) and median CrCl was 49 ml/min (6.3-59.5) in group 1. In group 2, 64% of pts were male, median age was 65 years (38-80), and median CrCl was 64 ml/min (58.1-137.1) Pts with MDRD < 60 were more likely to have had a previous nephrectomy (84.3% vs 79.7%). No difference between the 2 groups was observed in terms of outcomes: PFS was 9.6 months (0.6–56.9) and 9.0 months (0.4–60.1), OS was 16.1 months (1.3–56.9) and 17.0 months (1.2–60.1), for MDRD < 60 group and MDRD ≥60 respectively. The disease control rate was 85.8% in group 1, and 72.9% in group 2. About grade 1-2 toxicity, no difference between the 2 groups was reported (67.1% vs 67.8%) while a higher incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity was evident in the group 1 (25.7% vs 18.6%). Conclusions: RI was commonly observed in pts with mRCC. Renal function at therapy initiation does not adversely affect the efficacy and safety of pazopanib. More frequent monitoring of side-effects in patients with RI is recommended.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Monoclonal Antibodies targeting CD38, SLAMF7 and PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with Bortezomib/Immunomodulators plus Dexamethasone/Prednisone for the treatment of Multiple Myeloma: An Indirect-Comparison Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

10.21203/rs.3.rs-132450/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Wu Ye ◽

Xia Wu ◽

Xiaoyan Liu ◽

Xue Zheng ◽

Jili Deng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Monoclonal Antibodies ◽

Partial Response ◽

Randomized Controlled Trials ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Group Versus ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background In recent years, there were many clinical trials assessed the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) in combination with proteasome inhibitors or immunomodulators plus dexamethasone/prednisoneare for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). The treatment outcomes of comparing different MAbs in combination with above-mentioned agents remain unknown. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare indirectly the efficacy and safety of MAbs targeting CD38, SLAMF7 and PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with bortezomib/immunomodulators plus dexamethasone/ prednisone in patients with MM. Methods We electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which at least one of the three MAbs was included among multiple arms. We included eleven eligible RCTs with 5367 patients in the meta-analysis. Statistical analysis used StataMP14 and Indirect Treatment Comparisons software. Results We synthesized hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), relative risk (RR) for overall response rate, complete response (CR) or better, very good partial response (VGPR) or better, VGPR, partial response, stable disease and grade 3 or higher adverse events among the three groups. The HR for PFS of the CD38 group vs SLAMF7 group, CD38 group vs PD-1/PD-L1 group and SLAMF7 group vs PD-1/PD-L1 group were 0.662(95CI0.543-0.806), 0.317(95CI 0.221–0.454) and 0.479(95CI0.328-0.699) respectively. The HR for OS of the CD38 group vs SLAMF7 group was 0.812(0.584–1.127). The RR for CR or better in the CD38 group versus SLAMF7 group was 2.253(95CI1.284-3.955). The RR for neutropenia of the CD38 group versus SLAMF7 group was 1.818(95CI1.41-2.344). Conclusions Treatment with the CD38 group resulted in longer PFS and better treatment response than the SLAMF7 and PD-1/PD-L1 group. In addition, the SLAMF7 group prolonged PFS compared with the PD-1/PD-L1 group, and had a lower incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia than the CD38 and PD-1/PD-L1 group. In

Download Full-text

Combination Therapy Based on Bortezomib for Newly-Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: a Chinese Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.5036.5036 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 5036-5036

Author(s):

Li Yang ◽

Jing-Song He ◽

WenJun Wu ◽

Xiujin Ye ◽

Jimin Shi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Combination Chemotherapy ◽

Chinese Population ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Malignant Neoplasm ◽

Chinese Patients ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 5036 Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant neoplasm of plasma. With conventional chemotherapy, the rates of complete remission (CR) or very good partial remission (VGPR) are still low. Little has been reported on Bortezomib-based therapies specifically in the Chinese pateitns with MM. Here we report our results with combination therapy based on bortezomib in the Chinese population. We investigated the efficacy and safety of Bortezomib-based therapies in previously untreated MM patients. Methods: Between June 2006 and June 2010, 61 consecutive newly-diagnosed patients with symptomatic MM were treated with combination therapies based on Bortezomib. Forty-two patients were male and 19 were female. Median age was 59 years (range 37–86 years). Forty-four patients were stage 3 according to the International Staging System, 6 patients were stage 2 and 11 patients were stage 1. The conbinations included dexamethasone, dexamethasone plus subsequent thalidomide and dexamethasone plus cyclophosphamide. In detail, Bortezomib was at the dose of 1.3 mg per square meter IV on days 1, 4, 8, 11 and dexamethasone at 20 mg per square meter IV daily on the day of bortezomib and the day after, with or without daily oral thalidomide that was escalated from 100 mg to 200 mg (BD group or BDT group) or plus cyclophosphamide at 0.2 per square meter IV on days 1 to days 4 (BDC group). Thirty-four patients were in BDT group, 12 in BD group and 15 in BDC group. All patients received a median of three cycles of therapy (range 1–6). The IMWG criteria were used for response evaluation and toxicities were evluated according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria version 3. Results: The proportions of patients with very good partial response (VGPR) or better were 38% (13/34), 25% (3/12) and 60% (9/15) in BDT, BD and BDC group, respectively; 44% (15/34), 33% (4/12) and 33% (5/15) achieved partial response (PR). Therefore the overall response (VGPR plus PR) were 82% (28/34), 58% (7/12) and 93% (14/15). Three patients died with severe infection without disease progression. Grade 3–4 toxicities included fatigue (4/34, 1/12 and 4/15), thrombocytopenia (8/34, 3/12 and 5/15), diarrhea (4/34, 2/12 and 2/15) and infection (7/34,3/12,6/15) in BDT, BD and BDC group, respectively. Grade 1–2 neuropathy were occurred in 20 patients (59%), 6 patients (50%) and 9 patients (60%) and grade 3–4 were occurred in 6 (18%), 1 (8%) and 1 (7%) in BDT, BD and BDC group, respectively. Herpes zoster occurred in 6 patients (18%), 1 patients (8%) and 2 patients (13%) respectively. Routine anticoagulation or anti-thrombsis were not used. Only 1 patient suffered from DVT/PE but did well with treatment. Conclusions: Our preliminary experience in Chinese patients indicated that combination chemotherapy based on Bortezomib is highly effective in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma and BDC or BDT regimens may be more superior than BD in Chinese population. There were relative lower rates of grade 3–4 neuropathy and DVT/PE in the Chinese patients with MM receved combination chemotherapy based on bortezomib. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Clinical Efficacy of a Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Compared with Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.1868.1868 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 1868-1868

Author(s):

Jae-Sook Ahn ◽

Deok-Hwan Yang ◽

Joon Ho Moon ◽

Sang Kyun Sohn ◽

Sung-Hoon Jung ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Herpes Zoster ◽

Partial Response ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Sensory Neuropathy ◽

Salvage Regimen ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Acyclovir Prophylaxis

Abstract Abstract 1868 Backgrounds & Aims: Salvage therapy such as bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (Vel-CTD) showed an effective regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, toxicities of this regimen due to combination bortezomib and thalidomide interrupt the consecutive treatments in a few patients. Therefore, we compared the clinical responses and toxicities between bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Vel-CD) and Vel-CTD in patients with relapsed or refractory MM patients, retrospectively. Methods: Eighty-six patients received at least 2 cycles of treatment with Vel-CTD (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 i.v. on D1, 4, 8 and 11; cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2 orally on D1-4; thalidomide 50 mg/day orally every day; and dexamethasone 20 mg/m2 i.v. on D1, 4, 8 and 11 for every 3 weeks) and 67 patients with Vel-CD, which is the same regimen except thalidomide. Vel-CD group was only received low-dose acyclovir for prevention of herpes zoster. Results: 17/67 (25%) and 10/86 (12%) of light chain disease was enrolled in Vel-CD and Vel-CTD group respectively (p=0.027) and there was no statistical difference at baseline demographic and disease characteristics between two groups in the others. The median time from diagnosis to treatment in Vel-CD and Vel-CTD was 15.6 months (range, 2–250 months) and 15.7 months (range, 1–230 months), respectively (p=0.54). The median number of treatment cycles was 6 cycles (range, 2–18) in Vel-CD and 8 cycles (range, 2–24) in Vel CTD group, and the number of cycles delivered was 430 and 678, respectively. The overall response rates (≥PR) of Vel-CD and Vel-CTD group were 88% and 90% ( 49% and 48% of complete response, 9% and 14% of very good partial response, 30% and 28% of partial response), respectively (each, p>0.05). There was no difference in progression free survival (p=0.69) and overall survival (p=0.49). Grade 3 or more hematologic adverse events occurred in the same proportion of patients in the both group. In non hematologic toxicities profiles, Vel-CTD group (14%) showed the higher proportion of grade 3 or more sensory neuropathy compared with Vel-CD group (3%) (p=0.02). Dose adjustment of bortezomib in Vel-CD and Vel-CTD were 40% (27/67) and 41%(35/86), respectively (p=0.96). Two patients (3%) in Vel-CD group received acyclovir prophylaxis developed herpes zoster compared with 17 patients (20%) in Vel-CTD group they were not received acyclovir prophylaxis (p=0.002). Three patients showed thrombotic events (2: pulmonary thromboembolism, 1: acute myocardial infarction) in only Vel-CTD group despite aspirin prophylaxis (p=0.16). Conclusion: Vel-CD combination therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory MM is an effective and more tolerable salvage regimen compared with Vel-CTD in the aspect of comparable response rate, less non-hematologic toxicities especially thalidomide associated adverse events. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Combination Therapy Based on Bortezomib for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.5048.5048 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 5048-5048

Author(s):

Jingsong He ◽

Li Yang ◽

Dian Jin ◽

Xuanru Lin ◽

Qianqian Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Complete Response ◽

Chinese Patients ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Novel Drugs ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 5048 Introduction: Novel drugs, such as bortezomib, have significantly improved the response rates in multiple myeloma (MM), but little has been reported on bortezomib-based therapies in Chinese patients. Methods: In the initial eight 28-day cycles, newly diagnosed ymptomatic patients were treated with combination therapy including bortezomib plus dexamethasone (PD) and the triplet combinations of PD with adriamycin (PAD), cyclophosphamide (PCD), thalidomide (PDT) between February 1, 2006 and May 31, 2012. Among the above regimens, bortezomib (1. 3 mg/m2) was given intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, 11, while dexamethasone (20 mg/m2/day) was given intravenously on days 1–2, 4–5, 8–9, 11–12, adriamycin (10 mg/m2) was given intravenously on days 1–4, cyclophosphamide (200 mg/m2) was given intravenously on days 1–4 and thalidomide (100 mg) was administered orally each day. Results: The overall response rate (¡Ý partial response, PR) of all the 151 eligible patients was 88. 7% (including 29. 8% very good partial response (VGPR) and 25. 8% complete response/near complete response (CR/nCR). The responses per IMWG criteria for patients are shown in Table 2. The median PFS was 20. 3 months (95% CI: 14. 8–25. 8 months) in the patients who received PDT, 24. 8 months (95% CI: 20. 0–30. 0 months) in the patients who received PCD, 22. 9 months (95% CI: 17. 6–28. 2 months) in patients who received PAD and 21. 8 months (95% CI: 15. 3–28. 3 months) in the patients who received PD with no significant differences between the groups. The median OS for PD arm was 42. 0(95% CI: 20. 1–63. 9 months) months while other arms were not reached, but the median OS for PDT, PCD and PAD was significant longer than PD (P=0. 042, 0. 039, 0. 010). PFS and OS for patients with favorable cytogenetics were significantly longer than those with unfavorable cytogenetics by FISH. The frequently observed hematologic toxicities (Grade 3/4) were: thrombocytopenia (17. 00%), neutropenia (15. 00%) and anemia (8. 61%). The most common non-hematologic toxicities included (all Grades) peripheral neuropathy(57. 61%), fatigue(27. 15%), infection(23. 84%), constipation(22. 52%), herpes zoster(17. 22%) and diarrhea(15. 23%). Conclusions: Our experience indicated that bortezomib-based regimens were active and well-tolerated for MM patients, and triplet combinations were superior to PD. Serious Adverse events were rare in the Chinese patients with MM who received bortezomib-based chemotherapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a comparative analysis of 411 patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2009-08-239046 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 115 (7) ◽

pp. 1343-1350 ◽

Cited By ~ 88

Author(s):

Francesca Gay ◽

Suzanne R. Hayman ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

Francis Buadi ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Matched Pair ◽

Similar Proportion ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Free Survival ◽

Matched Pair Analysis ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Control Study

AbstractThe objective of this case-control study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (len/dex) versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone (thal/dex) as initial therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma. We retrospectively studied 411 newly diagnosed patients treated with len/dex (228) or thal/dex (183) at the Mayo Clinic. The differences were similar in a matched-pair analysis that adjusted for age, sex, transplantation status, and dexamethasone dose. The proportions of patients achieving at least a partial response to len/dex and thal/dex were 80.3% versus 61.2%, respectively (P < .001); very good partial response rates were 34.2% and 12.0%, respectively (P < .001). Patients receiving len/dex had longer time to progression (median, 27.4 vs 17.2 months; P = .019), progression-free survival (median, 26.7 vs 17.1 months; P = .036), and overall survival (median not reached vs 57.2 months; P = .018). A similar proportion of patients in the 2 groups experienced at least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event (57.5% vs 54.6%, P = .568). Main grade 3 or 4 toxicities of len/dex were hematologic, mainly neutropenia (14.6% vs 0.6%, P < .001); the most common toxicities in thal/dex were venous thromboembolism (15.3% vs 9.2%, P = .058) and peripheral neuropathy (10.4% vs 0.9%, P < .001). Len/dex appears well-tolerated and more effective than thal/dex. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

Download Full-text