Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone (Pom/Dex) in Relapsed Lenalidomide Refractory Myeloma: Long Term Follow up and Comparison of 2 Mg Vs 4 Mg Doses

Abstract Background: Pomalidomide has demonstrated excellent activity in patients with relapsed, lenalidomide refractory, multiple myeloma (MM). Between November 2007 and March 2012, we enrolled 285 patients with relapsed MM on 5 sequential phase 2 trials; patients received pomalidomide at 2mg or 4 mg daily with weekly dexamethasone (Pom/dex). The approved dose of pomalidomide is 4 mg for 21 of 28 days. We wished to compare efficacy, tolerability and long-term outcomes between cohorts treated with 2 mg or 4mg daily continuously and 4mg daily for 21/28 days. Methods: After excluding two ineligible patients, 283 patients with lenalidomide refractory, relapsed MM from 5 sequential cohorts were analyzed. These patients were divided into 3 groups: Group1 received Pom 2mg for 28/28 day cycle (N= 69), Group 2 received Pom 4 mg for 28/28 day cycle (N= 95) and Group 3 received Pom 4mg for 21/28 day cycle (N= 119). All patients received oral dexamethasone given 40 mg daily on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Response was assessed by the IMWG Uniform Response criteria. All patients received aspirin 325 mg daily for DVT prophylaxis or full dose anticoagulation. Results: The median age was 63 years (32-85); 35% were female. The median time from diagnosis was 53 months and the median number of prior regimens was 4. 127 (46%) had high-risk molecular markers. Prior therapies (% received) included lenalidomide (100%), thalidomide (46%), bortezomib (78%), autologous stem cell transplant (71%), and allogeneic transplant (4%). The median follow-up is 16.4 months (3.2-64.4). Forty eight percent are alive and 26% remain progression free; 15 patients are continuing to receive treatment. Frequency of AEs by groups are shown in Table 1. The most notable difference is grade 3+ neutropenia seen in 39% of group 1 and 56% and 57% of groups 2 and 3. Confirmed responses of PR or better were seen in 29% (group1), 35% (group2) and 24% (group3). Median duration of response (DOR) was 14.1 months (group1), 14.5 months (group2) and 10.2 months (group3). Median PFS was 5.5 months (group1), 6.9 months (group2) and 4.3 months (group3). Although the dose level cohorts were sequential rather than randomized, we compared OS between the dose levels in an exploratory manner. There was no significant difference in OS between dose levels (p=0.26). Median overall survival (OS) was 16.6 months (group1), 21.9 months (group2) and 16.0 months (group3). Conclusions: Pom/dex is active and well tolerated even in heavily pretreated patients Responses are durable. Response rates and overall toxicity are similar between the 2 mg and 4 mg doses. Neutropenia is more common in those receiving doses of 4mg daily or for 21/28 days compared to those receiving 2 mg daily. Table 1. All Grades Grade 3+ 2mg 28 Day 4mg 28 Day 4mg 21 Day 2mg 28 Day 4mg 28 Day 4mg 21 Day Anemia 68% 58% 74% 14% 15% 27% Lymphopenia 22% 51% 11% 16% 32% 8% Neutropenia 71% 82% 77% 39% 57% 56% Thrombocytopenia 51% 61% 63% 10% 9% 23% Leukopenia 59% 77% 72% 26% 38% 39% Pneumonia 7% 11% 12% 6% 7% 11% Fatigue 51% 65% 60% 9% 5% 8% Neuropathy 28% 32% 28% 0% 3% 0% Elevated Blood Glucose 10% 21% 8% 4% 6% 3% Pneumonitis 3% 2% 3% 3% 1% 1% VTE (Thrombosis) 3% 3% 3% 1% 3% 3% Secondary Malignancy 0% 2% 1% 0% 2% 1% Figure1. Kaplan Meier Overall Survival Curves Figure1. Kaplan Meier Overall Survival Curves Disclosures Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Fonseca:Medtronic, Otsuka, Celgene, Genzyme, BMS, Lilly, Onyx, Binding Site, Millennium, AMGEN: Consultancy, patent for the prognostication of MM based on genetic categorization of the disease. He also has sponsored research from Cylene and Onyx Other, Research Funding. Bergsagel:Novartis: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; OncoEthix: Research Funding; MundiPharma: Research Funding. Stewart:Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Array BioPharma: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding. Reeder:Millennium, Celgene, Novartis: Research Funding. Mikhael:Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Detailed Evaluation of Transplant-Related Toxicities and Outcome for Patients with CNS Lymphoma (CNSL) Consolidated with High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (HDT-ASCT) Using Thiotepa, Busulfan (Bu), Cyclophosphamide (TBC) Conditioning

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4354.4354 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4354-4354

Author(s):

Michael Scordo ◽

Valkal Bhatt ◽

Meier Hsu ◽

Antonio M. Omuro ◽

Matthew J. Matasar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Secondary Malignancy ◽

Cns Lymphoma ◽

High Dose ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Clinically Significant ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: HDT-ASCT with TBC conditioning has emerged as a common consolidation strategy for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) primary (PCNSL) or secondary (SCNSL) (Welch et al, Leuk & Lymph 2014). In a prospective study, chemosensitive PCNSL pts in first remission after induction with R-MPV (rituximab, MTX, procarbazine and vincristine) proceeding to HDT-ASCT with TBC conditioning, experienced an encouraging 2-year PFS and OS of 75% and 81%, respectively (Omuro et al, Blood, 2015). Three of these patients experienced transplant-related mortality (TRM, 11.5%), which appears greater than HDT-ASCT for other lymphomas. The purpose of this report is to correlate characteristic toxicities of TBC conditioning for CNSL to pre-HDT-ASCT clinical variables. Methods: The MSKCC IRB approved this retrospective chart review. Eligible pts (n=34) were ≥ 18 years of age with PCNSL or SCNSL that was chemosensitive to induction therapy after which they proceeded to HDT-ASCT conditioned with TBC between December 2006 and April 2015. All pts included were treated outside of prospective clinical trials. Clinically significant grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicities per CTCAE 4.0 occurring in >20% of pts were recorded from the initiation of conditioning until 6 months post ASCT (Figure 1). Pre-HDT-ASCT variables for analysis include: age, gender, disease (PCNSL or SCNSL), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCT-CI), number of prior regimens, prior use of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and disease status prior to HDT-ASCT (CR/CRu or PR). We evaluated the association of these pre-HDT-ASCT characteristics with the number of clinically significant grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicities (≥4 vs. <4) using FisherÕs exact test. We further estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Thirty-three patients (97%) experienced ≥ 1 grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicity. Febrile neutropenia (grade 3) occurred in 32 pts (94%). Of all pre-HDT-ASCT variables, only the number of prior regimens (>2) was significantly associated with incurring more grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicities, p=0.04 (Table 1). With a median follow-up for survivors of 12 months (range, 1.5-86.2 months), PFS was 79% (95% CI, 65-96) and OS was 82% (95% CI, 68-98) at 1 year (Figures 2 and 3). During the follow-up period, there were 7 pt deaths: 4 died of disease, 2 died secondary to TRM (5.9%), and one died of a secondary malignancy (squamous cell carcinoma) 86.2 months after HDT-ASCT. There were no progression events beyond 12 months. In a limited subset analysis wherein n=22 had first dose bu pharmacokinetics evaluated, pre-HDT-ASCT variables were not associated with higher bu AUC levels, though 64% of these pts required a dose reduction. Conclusions: We reaffirmed that HDT-ASCT with TBC conditioning is effective consolidation for CNSL, but it is associated with more grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicity in pts having had >2 prior regimens. Risk-adapted dose attenuation of TBC conditioning for this group of pts may mitigate observed toxicity. Table 1. Association of Pre-ASCT Variables & Grade 3-5 Non-hematologic Toxicities Number of Clinically Significant Grade 3-5 Toxicities Pre-ASCT Variables All (N=34) Fewer than 4 (N=21) 4 or more (N=13) p-value Age 0.71 <60 23 (68%) 15 (71%) 8 (62%) ≥60 11 (32%) 6 (29%) 5 (38%) Gender 0.72 Female 13 (38%) 9 (43%) 4 (31%) Male 21 (62%) 12 (57%) 9 (69%) Disease 0.30 PCNSL 19 (56%) 10 (48%) 9 (69%) SCNSL 15 (44%) 11 (52%) 4 (31%) KPS 0.99 ≥80 32 (94%) 20 (95%) 12 (92%) <80 2 (6%) 1 (5%) 1 (8%) BMT HCT CI 0.99 ≤2 17 (50%) 11 (52%) 6 (46%) >2 17 (50%) 10 (48%) 7 (54%) Number of Prior Regimens 0.04 ≤2 21 (62%) 16 (76%) 5 (38%) >2 13 (38%) 5 (24%) 8 (62%) WBRT 0.17 No 28 (82%) 19 (90%) 9 (69%) Yes 6 (18%) 2 (10%) 4 (31%) Disease state prior 0.99 CR/CRu 29 (85%) 18 (86%) 11 (85%) PR 5 (15%) 3 (14%) 2 (15%) Figure 1. Analysis of Grade 3-5 Non-Hematologic Toxicities Figure 1. Analysis of Grade 3-5 Non-Hematologic Toxicities Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Curve for PFS Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Curve for PFS Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier Curve for OS Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier Curve for OS Disclosures Bhatt: Spectrum: Consultancy. Moskowitz:GSK: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Giralt:TAKEDA: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding; SANOFI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Slowly resorbable biosynthetic mesh: 2-year results in VHWG grade 3 hernia repair

Hernia ◽

10.1007/s10029-021-02453-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

M. M. J. Van Rooijen ◽

T. Tollens ◽

L. N. Jørgensen ◽

T. S. de Vries Reilingh ◽

G. Piessen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Hernia Repair ◽

Hernia Recurrence ◽

Recurrence Rates ◽

Elective Repair ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Information on the long-term performance of biosynthetic meshes is scarce. This study analyses the performance of biosynthetic mesh (Phasix™) over 24 months. Methods A prospective, international European multi-center trial is described. Adult patients with a Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) grade 3 incisional hernia larger than 10 cm2, scheduled for elective repair, were included. Biosynthetic mesh was placed in sublay position. Short-term outcomes included 3-month surgical site occurrences (SSO), and long-term outcomes comprised hernia recurrence, reoperation, and quality of life assessments until 24 months. Results Eighty-four patients were treated with biosynthetic mesh. Twenty-two patients (26.2%) developed 34 SSOs, of which 32 occurred within 3 months (primary endpoint). Eight patients (11.0%) developed a hernia recurrence. In 13 patients (15.5%), 14 reoperations took place, of which 6 were performed for hernia recurrence (42.9%), 3 for mesh infection (21.4%), and in 7 of which the mesh was explanted (50%). Compared to baseline, quality of life outcomes showed no significant difference after 24 months. Despite theoretical resorption, 10.7% of patients reported presence of mesh sensation in daily life 24 months after surgery. Conclusion After 2 years of follow-up, hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh shows manageable SSO rates and favorable recurrence rates in VHWG grade 3 patients. No statistically significant improvement in quality of life or reduction of pain was observed. Few patients report lasting presence of mesh sensation. Results of biosynthetic mesh after longer periods of follow-up on recurrences and remodeling will provide further valuable information to make clear recommendations. Trial registration Registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02720042), March 25, 2016.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Sustained Responses Following Ibrutinib Discontinuation after Frontline Therapy with Obinutuzumab Plus Ibrutinib in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-143473 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 33-34

Author(s):

Paula A. Lengerke Diaz ◽

Michael Y. Choi ◽

Eider F. Moreno Cortes ◽

Jose V. Forero ◽

Juliana Velez-Lujan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Side Effects ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Combination Regimen ◽

Grade 3

Single oral targeted therapies have emerged as a standard of care in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, accessibility, side effects, and financial burden associated with long term administration limit their clinical use. Mainly, it is unclear in what clinical situation discontinuation of oral therapy can be recommended. The combination of type II anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab-Gazyva® with ibrutinib (GI) has shown a significant progression-free survival benefit in patients (pts) with CLL, including those with high-risk genomic aberrations. We conducted a phase 1b/2, single-arm, open-label trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GI as first-line treatment in 32 CLL pts. We report the outcome in pts that discontinued ibrutinib (either after 3 years of sustained complete response (CR) as stipulated in the clinical protocol, or due to other reasons). CLL pts enrolled in this protocol were ≥65 years old, or unfit/unwilling to receive chemotherapy. Pts received GI for six cycles, followed by daily single-agent ibrutinib. The protocol was designed to ensure that pts with a sustained CR after 36 months were allowed to discontinue ibrutinib. The median age was 66 years (IQR 59-73), and 6% of the evaluated pts had 17p deletion. All pts were able to complete the six planned cycles of obinutuzumab. The combination regimen was well-tolerated, and the most common adverse events (>5% CTCAE grade 3-4) were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hyperglycemia. The rate and severity of infusion-related reactions (IRR) were much lower than expected (Grade≥ 3, 3%), and pts without IRR had lower serum levels of cytokines/chemokines CCL3 (P=0.0460), IFN-γ (P=0.0457), and TNF-α (P=0.0032) after infusion. The overall response rate was 100%, with nine pts (28%) achieving a CR, and four pts (12.5%) with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) in the bone marrow, defined as <10-4 CLL cells on multicolor flow cytometry. At a median follow-up of 35.5 months (IQR 24.5-42.7) after starting treatment, 91% of the enrolled pts remain in remission with a 100% overall survival. Sixteen pts have completed a long-term follow-up of 36 months. Six pts showed CR, with three of them achieving uMRD in the bone marrow. Ten of these pts were in PR, and only one had disease progression and started treatment for symptomatic stage I disease with obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. In total, thirteen pts (41%) have stopped ibrutinib, with a median time on treatment prior to discontinuation of 35 months. Five (16%) of these pts had CRs and discontinued after 36 months. Eight additional pts (25%) had PRs and discontinued ibrutinib without being eligible: three pts discontinued prior to 36 months due to toxicities, and five pts discontinued after 36 months (3 due to side effects, and 2 due to financially driven decision). One patient eligible to discontinue ibrutinib, decided to remain on treatment despite sustained CR. After a median follow up time following ibrutinib discontinuation of 8 months (IQR 3.5-17), only two out of 13 pts have progressed (10 and 17 months after Ibrutinib discontinuation). None of the pts that stopped ibrutinib after achieving a CR have shown signs of disease progression. Of note, the pharmaceutical sponsor provided ibrutinib for the first 36 months, after which pts or their insurer became financially responsible. This particular scenario could bias the discontinuation pattern compared to a real world experience. It also provided us with a perspective about diverse factors affecting the treatment choices of pts. In summary, the obinutuzumab plus ibrutinib combination therapy was well-tolerated, with a much lower IRR rate. Efficacy compares favorably with historical controls with all pts responding to therapy, no deaths associated with treatment or disease progression, and a longer than expected time-to-progression after discontinuation of ibrutinib. The rate of ibrutinib discontinuation was higher than reported in the literature, most likely influenced by the protocol design and financial decisions driven by the switch from sponsor-provided ibrutinib to insurance or self-paid medication. Our observations regarding safety, efficacy and lack of disease progression after ibrutinib discontinuation are encouraging, and warrant confirmation in long-term prospective studies. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02315768. Funding: Pharmacyclics LLC. Disclosures Choi: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Amaya-Chanaga:AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Other: Research performed while employed as an investigator of this study at UCSD.. Kipps:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Castro:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Thirty-Five Year Follow-up Analysis of Follicular Lymphoma Patients Treated through the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group: Prognostic Factor Analysis and Outcomes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142743 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 7-8

Author(s):

Amulya Yellala ◽

Elizabeth R. Lyden ◽

Heather Nutsch ◽

Avyakta Kallam ◽

Kai Fu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Treatment Regimen ◽

Research Funding ◽

Study Group ◽

Secondary Malignancies ◽

Lymphoma Study Group

Background Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and most common of the clinically indolent NHLs. Although often considered an incurable disease, overall survival has increased significantly with refinement in diagnostic techniques and the addition of rituximab. The course of FL is quite variable and presence of symptoms, organ dysfunction, cytopenias, aggressiveness of tumor are all taken into consideration when deciding individual treatment. In this study, we evaluated a large patient cohort with FL treated over a 35 year period for progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) based on FLIPI score, tumor grade, and treatment regimen and also looked at causes of late failures. Methods We evaluated 1037 patients (pts) from the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group that were diagnosed with FL between the years of 1983-2020. Descriptive statistics were stratified according to age, histological subtype, treatment regimen, FLIPI category, presence and type of secondary malignancy. PFS was calculated from the time of diagnosis to progression or death and OS was the time from diagnosis to death from any cause. PFS and OS were plotted as Kaplan-Meier curves with statistically significant p<0.05. Results The median age at diagnosis and treatment was 61 years (yrs, range 17-91). A total of 9.1% were characterized as FLIPI high risk, 37.8% intermediate risk, and 33.6% low risk, 19.5% unavailable. Among the histological grade, 23.1% had FL- grade 1, 30.2% FL-2, 27.3% FL-3A, 2.5 % FL-3B and 16.9 % Composite Lymphoma. Anthracycline + rituximab was given in 24.5% of pts, whereas 43.8% of pts received an anthracycline based regimen without rituximab, 9.8% received rituximab without an anthracycline and 10.6% received neither of these agents. 6.75% (70 pts) were later found to have secondary malignancies of which 11 pts had myelodysplastic syndrome, 10 pts had acute leukemia and 9 pts had lung cancer. With a median follow up of 9.2 yrs and a maximum of 36 yrs, 29.7% (308 pts) had not relapsed. The median PFS across all groups was 4.6 yrs (Fig 1) and OS was 12.1 yrs. Median OS was significantly longer in patients that received rituximab at 16.1 yrs as compared to patients that did not receive rituximab at 9.89 yrs (Fig 2). PFS was 8.6 yrs, 3.6 yrs and 2.1 yrs and OS was 15.1 yrs, 11.7 yrs and 4.9 yrs in FLIPI low, intermediate and high risk groups respectively (p=<0.001) (Fig 3), suggesting that survival was influenced by FLIPI score. Median PFS in FL-3B and FL-3A was 9.2 yrs and 5.2 yrs respectively which is longer than 4.7 yrs and 4.2 yrs for FL-1 and FL-2 (p=0.24). OS in FL-3A and FL-3B subgroups was 10.8 yrs while it was 11.6 yrs and 14.3 yrs in FL-2 and FL-1 (P=0.081). PFS is significantly longer at 10.6 yrs in pts treated with both anthracycline and rituximab containing regimen as compared to 5.3 yrs in pts treated with rituximab alone and 3.05 yrs in pts that had only anthracycline based regimen (p=<0.001) (Fig 4). The median OS also was significantly higher in the combination regimen group at 18.8 yrs as compared to 11.3 yrs in rituximab only group and 9 yrs in anthracycline based regimen group (p=<0.001). When pts with FL-3A and FL-3B were grouped together and stratified according to treatment regimen, the group that received anthracycline and rituximab combination has highest PFS and OS at 13.3 yrs and 18.8 yrs (p<0.001). when pts with FL-3A were analyzed separately and stratified by treatment regimen, the results of PFS and OS were similar and statistically significant. However, of the 24 pts in FL-3B group, analysis revealed that PFS and OS was longer in anthracycline based regimen only group, however results were not statistically significant. Among the pts that relapsed/died after 10 years (n=190), the cause of death was relapsed lymphoma in 13.7%, unknown in 55.8%, secondary malignancies in 4.2%, treatment related in 2.6% and not related to disease in 23.7%. A total of 278 pts survived > 10 yrs, and of these pts, 119 (30%) had not relapsed at the last follow up. Conclusion The addition of rituximab to standard anthracycline based chemotherapy has resulted in significant improvements in the PFS and OS rates of FL. These results also support the prognostic value of the FLIPI in patients treated in the rituximab era. Late relapses after 10 yrs from disease can occur, but 11.5% of patients had not relapsed with long term follow up. Secondary malignancies are also an important consideration in the long term survivors. Disclosures Lunning: Acrotech: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Curis: Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Aeratech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Legend: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy. Armitage:Trovagene/Cardiff Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Samus Therapeutics: Consultancy; Ascentage: Consultancy. Vose:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Allogene: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria, Research Funding; Wugen: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Roche/Genetech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria; Loxo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Long-term functional outcomes of different subtypes of primary congenital glaucoma

British Journal of Ophthalmology ◽

10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315131 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. bjophthalmol-2019-315131 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Richard Sher Chaudhary ◽

Amisha Gupta ◽

Ajay Sharma ◽

Shikha Gupta ◽

Rayees Ahmad Sofi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Visual Acuity ◽

Congenital Glaucoma ◽

Cumulative Probability ◽

Primary Congenital Glaucoma ◽

Visual Outcomes ◽

Post Surgery ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Significant Difference

AimTo analyse long-term visual outcomes across different subtypes of primary congenital glaucoma (PCG).MethodsPatients with PCG with a minimum of 5-year follow-up post surgery were included in the study. Snellen visual acuity recordings taken at their last follow-up were analysed. We evaluated the results using Kaplan-Meier curves to predict the probability of maintaining good vision (as defined by a visual acuity of 6/18 or better) in our patients after 30-year follow-up. The results were also analysed to determine whether there were any differences in the long-term visual acuities with time between the neonatal and infantile PCG. We also analysed the reasons for poor visual outcomes.ResultsWe assessed a cohort of 140 patients with PCG (235 eyes) with an average follow-up of 127±62.8 months (range 60–400 months). Overall, the proportion of eyes with good visual acuity was 89 (37.9%), those with fair visual acuity between 6/60 and 6/18 was 41 (17.4%), and those with poor visual acuity (≤6/60) was 105 (44.7%). We found a significant difference (p=0.047) between neonatal and infantile patients with PCG whereby the neonatal cohort fared worse off in terms of visual morbidity. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cumulative probability of survival of a visual acuity of 6/18 or better was more among the infantile PCG in comparison to the neonatal PCG (p=0.039) eyes, and more among the bilateral than the unilateral affected eyes (p=0.029). Amblyopia was the most important cause for poor visual acuity as shown on a Cox proportional-hazards regression model .ConclusionsLong-term visual outcomes of infantile are better than neonatal PCG. Eyes with unilateral have worse visual outcomes compared with those with bilateral PCG because of the development of dense amblyopia.

Download Full-text

Dose Intensive Induction Chemotherapy Does Not Decrease Tumor Contamination of Autograft or Improve Survival for Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplant.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v106.11.2932.2932 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 106 (11) ◽

pp. 2932-2932

Author(s):

Farzana A. Sayani ◽

Nizar J. Bahlis ◽

Peter Faris ◽

Mary Lynn Savoie ◽

Ahsan Chaudhry ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Small Sample ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Intensive Chemotherapy ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Time To Relapse

Abstract Multiple dose intensive chemotherapy regimens have been used for induction/mobilization of stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma. However, the exact role and regimens of such dose intensive chemotherapy has not been clearly defined. We therefore did a retrospective study to determine if dose intensive cyclophosphamide (Cyclo) 5.25 g/m2, etoposide 1.05 g/m2 and cisplatin 105 mg/m2 (DICEP) results in improved relapse rate and survival compared to standard mobilization with only Cyclo 2 g/m2. Between January 1998 and March 2004, a consecutive series of 57 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients receiving DICEP (38) or Cyclo (19) for in-vivo purging/mobilization were analyzed. Both groups were similar in regards to age and sex. There were no significant differences in IPI score, Durie-Salmon stage, B2 microglobulin, calcium, creatinine and albumin levels between treatment groups. Outcomes included time to relapse and time to death. Median follow up time was 799 days. Kaplan-Meier plots for time to relapse showed no significant difference (p=0.0992). Median relapse time in the DICEP group was 905 days (95% CI 580–1604) compared to 1112 days (95% CI 742-infinity) in the Cyclo group. Kaplan-Meier plots for overall survival showed no significant difference between both groups (p=0.8664). The median survival times have not yet been reached in either group and are not reported. Analysis revealed no discernable confounding risk factors. Effects of treatment on outcomes were not altered after adjusting for IPI score and Durie-Salmon staging using the stratified log-rank test. Small sample size and short duration of followup are potential limiting factors for this study, however, preliminary analysis of a larger sample of 91 multiple myeloma patients receiving either DICEP or a less intense induction/mobilization regimen, also revealed no significant difference in disease free or overall survival. Monoclonal plasma cell contamination of stem cell products was not significantly different between both groups (DICEP 42.9%, Cyclo 56.3%, p=0.5573). This study therefore suggests that the very intense DICEP induction/mobilization regimen results in no significant difference in survival outcomes. The more intense regimen does not significantly decrease tumor contamination of autograft stem cells. Overall, our experience suggests that novel induction therapies such as bortezomib, lenolidomide etc. should be pursued in preference to any further study of high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy induction. Figure Figure

Download Full-text

Seven-Year Follow-up Data on Sequential Prospective Trials of Imatinib 400mg Vs 800mg Daily Schedule for Front-Line Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3438.3438 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3438-3438

Author(s):

Naveen Pemmaraju ◽

Hagop Kantarjian ◽

Susan O'Brien ◽

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Elias Jabbour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Annual Rate ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Free Survival ◽

Cumulative Rate ◽

Prospective Trials

Abstract Abstract 3438 Background: The standard of care for most patients (pts) with CML has been imatinib mesylate at a dose of 400mg by mouth daily. Earlier studies have suggested that there may be a benefit to pts to start treatment at a higher dose as this may result in faster and more durable responses to imatinib. It is not yet known whether long-term event-free survival (EFS), transformation-free survival (TFS), and overall survival (OS) will be impacted by the higher dosing schedule. Objectives: To determine the long term responses and clinical benefit of imatinib 800mg daily versus 400mg daily dosing when used as upfront treatment strategy in CML. Methods: We conducted sequential prospective trials using imatinib 400mg or 800mg daily as initial therapy for patients with previously untreated chronic phase CML. Results: A total of 281 pts were included in these trials: 208 treated with 800mg and 73 with 400mg. The median follow-up for each group was 79 months (range: 3–107) and 110 months (range: 2–116). The overall, cumulative rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was 91% and 87%, respectively (p=0.49) for those treated with high- and standard-dose, and the cumulative rate of major molecular response (MMR) was 87% and 78%, respectively (p=0.06). Rates of CCyR at 12 months were 90% and 66%, respectively (p < 0.001), and MMR at 18 months 82% and 68%, respectively (p=0.04). A significantly better EFS (definition per IRIS criteria) was observed for the 800 mg group compared to that in the 400mg group (log-rank test, p=0.049; estimated 7-year EFS 86% vs 76% by Kaplan-Meier method). No significant differences were seen for survival free from transformation to accelerated and blast phase (p = 0.46) and overall survival (p = 0.27). For OS, thus far 19 pts in the 800mg group have died (2 probable CML-related, 3 unknown causes, 14 non CML related) compared to 13 pts (10 probable CML-related, 3 non CML-related) in the 400mg group. The table below shows the annual rate of events and transformation for each dose group. Treatment discontinuation for toxicity occurred in 16 (8%) pts treated with 800mg and 6 (8%) pts treated with 400mg. Conclusions: At 7-year follow up, pts treated with 800mg demonstrated a significantly better EFS (by IRIS criteria) compared to those treated with 400mg. There is a trend for a lower annual rate of events and transformation with the higher dose, particualry in the earlier years, but no difference in OS. These results suggest a modest benefit for patients treated with higher dose imatinib. Disclosures: Off Label Use: imatinib at dose of 800mg po daily for CML. Kantarjian:BMS, Pfizer and Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Ravandi:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novarits: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Alemtuzumab Plus Oral Dexamethasone, Followed by Alemtuzumab Maintenance or Allogeneic Transplantation in Ultra High-Risk CLL: Interim Analysis of a Phase II Study of the GCLLSG and fcgcll/MW

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2854.2854 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2854-2854 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽

Florence Cymbalista ◽

Véronique Leblond ◽

Alain Delmer ◽

Dirk Winkler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Long Term Results ◽

High Dose ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Ultra High Risk ◽

Grade 3 ◽

The Impact

Abstract Abstract 2854 Alemtuzumab (A) proved to be efficacious in CLL patients (pts) with very poor prognosis, either due to fludarabine (F) refractoriness or due to unfavorable cytogenetics (17p-). However, rate and duration of remissions still remain unsatisfactory. Therefore, the French and German CLL study groups jointly embarked on this trial, trying to achieve higher overall response rates (ORR) by adding high-dose dexamethasone (D) to A and, simultaneously, investigating the consolidation effect of prolonged A maintenance or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT), respectively. Induction treatment consisted of subcutaneous A 30 mg weekly × 3 for 28 days, combined with oral D 40 mg on days 1–4 and 15–18, and prophylactic pegfilgrastim 6 mg on days 1 and 15. Depending on the remission status, pts were treated for up to 12 weeks. If CR was documented at 4 or 8 weeks, or at least SD was achieved at 12 weeks, consolidation was scheduled with either allo-SCT or A maintenance with 30 mg every 14 days for up to 2 years (y), at the discretion of pt and physician. Between January 2008 and July 2011, 124 pts were recruited at 26 centers, 120 of whom were eligible. Pts were generally subdivided into three cohorts: 55 pts were refractory (i.e. no response or relapse within 6 months) to regimens containing F or a similar drug (i.e. pentostatin, cladribine, bendamustine). Non-refractory pts all exhibited 17p- and had either untreated (n=39) or relapsed CLL (n = 26) requiring therapy. The median age was high with 66/64/66 y in 17p- 1st line, 17p- relapse, and F-refractory pts, respectively. The three cohorts had 46/54/75% Binet C disease, 41/35/27% B symptoms, 38/42/53% reduced performance status (ECOG 1/2), median thymidine kinase levels of 35/49/24 U/L, median ß2MG levels of 3.8/5.5/4.6 mg/L, and IGHV was unmutated in 89/96/87%. In the F-refractory group, 53% exhibited 17p deletion and 22% had 11q deletion. Pretreated patients had received a median of 3 (F-refractory) or 2 prior lines (17p- relapse). 5 pts had previously undergone autologous and 1 pt allo-SCT. Treatment and efficacy data are currently available for 87 pts who completed induction therapy :17p- 1st-line (n=30), 17p- relapse (n=17), and F-refractory (n=40). Of these, 80/53/55% received the full induction of 12 weeks. ORR (best observed status) was generally high with 97/76/70%. CR was achieved in 20/0/5%. After a median follow-up of 11.8 months (mo), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.9/10.4/8.4 mo. Deaths are recorded in 13/27/36% of pts, with median overall survival (OS) not yet reached (>24 mo) in the 17p- 1st line group, and 15/12 mo in 17p- relapse/F-refractory pts. Consolidation treatment was performed as maintenance A (median duration 32 weeks, range 2 – 89) in 34%, and allo-SCT in 30%, with a median age of 66 and 61 y in these subgroups. The main reasons for going off-study without consolidation were death due to infection (14%, n=11, of these 6 without response, and 10 in the F-refractory cohort), CLL progression (12%), and other toxicity (5%). Among the 28 pts not receiving consolidation, there were 19 (68%) deaths, 15 of them in the F-refractory cohort. When comparing A maintenance and allo-SCT for consolidation, there were 9 (35%) and 7 (30%) PD events, respectively and there was so far no significant difference in PFS (median 17 mo in both groups) or OS. During induction, grade 3/4 hematotoxicity consisted of anemia in 28%, neutropenia in 47%, and thrombopenia in 44%. Grade 3/4 non-CMV infection occurred in 29% of 17p- 1st-line, 15% of 17p- relapsed, and 56% of F-refractory pts. CMV reactivation was observed in 54/25/40%, without severe sequelae recorded. During A maintenance, grade 3/4 toxicity consisted of neutropenia in 39% pts and thrombopenia in 4% pts with 6 SAEs (ITP, diarrhea, infection, erythema, tachycardia, and thrombosis). Conclusions: The combination of A and D shows high response rates in ultra high-risk CLL, with promising preliminary findings for PFS and OS, despite the high median age of the pts. The results compare favorably to ORR/CR of 68%/5%, and median PFS of 11.3 mo in the 17p- subgroup of the CLL8 study treated with FCR, consisting of younger pts (median 61 y). In F-refractory CLL however, when compared to the preceding CLL2H study with single agent A, the improved initial response by adding dexamethasone does not seem to translate into improved long-term results. More mature follow-up is needed, especially with respect to the impact of allo-SCT. Disclosures: Stilgenbauer: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Alemtuzumab in 1st line CLL treatment. Cymbalista:Roche (d) Mundipharma (e) Genzyme (e): Honoraria, Research Funding. Hinke:WiSP (CRO): Employment.

Download Full-text

Escalated Dose Bortezomib Once Weekly Combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (eVRD) Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance in First Relapse of Multiple Myeloma (MM). the HOVON 86 Phase 2 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1853.1853 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1853-1853

Author(s):

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Okke de Weerdt ◽

Mark-David Levin ◽

Wendimagegn Ghidey ◽

Edo Vellenga ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Level 3 ◽

First Relapse ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 1853 Background: Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) combined with Lenalidomide (10–25 mg) and Dexamethasone (VRD) is effective in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Reported data on the effect of these drugs in relapse/refractory MM are available from the APEX and MM-009/MM-010 trials, respectively. These trials, however, were performed in patients with 2–8 prior regimens. Aim: This investigator sponsored two-step phase 2 HOVON trial was designed to evaluate escalated dosages of Bortezomib (B) given once weekly and daily Lenalidomide (L) combined with weekly Dexamethasone (D) (eVRD) followed by Lenalidomide maintenance in an homogenous group of patients with symptomatic MM in first relapse. The goal was to explore the maximum tolerated dose of this combination in order to achieve a durable second remission. Methods: Dose levels were B 1.3 mg/m2, L 10 mg, (level 1); B 1.6 mg/m2, L 10 mg (level 2); B 1.6 mg/m2, L 15 mg (level 3); B 1.6 mg/m2, L 20 mg (level 4). D dose was 20 mg days 1–2, 8–9, 15–16 in all dose levels. Inclusion criteria were symptomatic MM ISS stage 1–3, aged 18–80 in first relapse after initial treatment. The primary endpoint was response (complete response (CR) according to IMWG criteria, very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), together overall response (ORR)) with Progression-free Survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity as secondary endpoints. Results: Eighty-one patients were included, i.e. 15 patients in dose levels 1, 2 and 3, followed by 66 in the phase 2 part. This report is based on 12 patients in the dose escalation phase and the first 42 patients in the phase 2 part. Median age was 67 yrs, with ISS stages 1 (56%), 2 (40%) and 3 (5%). 37/54 patients had received HDM followed by stem cell transplant as part of first-line treatment. The MTD was reached at dose level 3 when the maximum of 3 SAEs in 5 patients was observed. After establishment of the MTD, the phase 2 part of the trial was performed with B 1.6 mg/m2 once weekly for 3 weeks, L 20 mg days 1–21 and D 20 mg days 1–2, 8–9, 15–16, for 8 cycles of 28 days followed by L maintenance 10 mg days 1–21 of a 28 days cycle. The median number of cycles was 6 in the dose-escalation phase and 7 cycles in phase 2. 7/12 (58%) patients in the dose-escalation phase and 23/42 (55%) patients in phase 2 started lenalidomide maintenance. Reasons for premature discontinuation of the protocol treatment were toxicity (14%), progression (24%), no response (5%) or other (14%). Polyneuropathy grade 3–4 occurred in 19% with a median time to maximum PNP of 123 days. Hematological toxicity grade 3 and 4 was observed in 29 % of patients In the phase 2 part including 42 patients the ORR was 92 %, ≥VGPR 64% and CR/nCR 30%. Median time to response was 1.1 cycles. At a median follow-up of 13.6 months PFS at 18 months was 52% and OS 76%. Among predetermined risk factors ISS stage, prior HDM/ASCT and achieved response on protocol, depth of response was the only significant factor which was associated with PFS (p<0.001) and OS (p<0.001), Eight patients died from progressive MM (n=4) or other causes (n=4). One second primary malignancy was observed in dose level 3. Conclusions: Escalated VRD followed by Lenalidomide maintenance is effective and feasible in patients with first relapse MM. We will present an updated follow-up at ASH This trial was registered as Eudract nr 2007–002533–37. Unrestricted grants and study drug were provided by Janssen and Celgene. Disclosures: Sonneveld: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

5-Azacytidine (AZA) in Combination with Ruxolitinib (RUX) As Therapy for Patients (pts) with Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MDS/MPNs)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.823.823 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 823-823 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Naval Daver ◽

Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Lingsha Zhou ◽

Sherry Pierce ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽

Single Agent ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽

Hematological Toxicity ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Clinical trials exclusively focusing on pts with MDS/MPN are lacking. AZA is a DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor approved for the therapy of MDS while RUX is a JAK inhibitor approved as therapy for primary myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera. RUX and AZA may target distinct clinical and pathological manifestations of MDS/MPNs. Aim: To determine the efficacy and safety of RUX + AZA in pts with MDS/MPN requiring therapy including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia BCR-ABL1 negative (aCML), and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U)(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01787487). Methods: A sequential approach with single-agent RUX 15 mg orally twice daily (if platelets 100-200) or 20 mg twice daily (if platelets >200) continuously (pts with platelets below 50 were not eligible) in 28-day cycles for the first 3 cycles followed by the addition of AZA 25 mg/m2 on days 1-5 of each 28-day cycle starting cycle 4 was adopted. The AZA dosage could be gradually increased to a maximum of 75 mg/m2. The AZA could be started earlier than cycle 4 and/or at a higher dose in pts with proliferative disease or elevated blasts. Results: 24 pts were enrolled between March 1, 2013 and April 1, 2015. Baseline characteristics are summarized in table 1. 17 pts remain alive after a median (med) follow-up of 6.0 (3.7 - 21.3+) months. Responses were evaluated by the MDS/MPN IWG response criteria (Savona et al., Blood 2015, 125(12):1857-65). Responses were noted in 12 (50%) pts. Details of responses are shown in table 2. Med time to responses was 1.8 mos (0.7 - 5.5+) and the med duration of response is 7.0 mos (1.8 - 17.6+). Additionally, 9 pts had >5% pretreatment BM blasts: 6 of these pts had follow-up BM evaluations and 3 achieved a reduction in blasts to <5% with a med time to blast reduction of 5.5 mos (5.5 - 11.2+). Serial evaluation of bone marrow biopsies documented reduction in EUMNET fibrosis score in 3 of 11 (27%) evaluable pts after a med of 5.5 mos (2.1 - 5.6+) on therapy. The reduction was by one grade in all 3 pts (MF-2 to MF-1 in 2 pts, MF-1 to MF-0 in 1 pt) and was confirmed on a subsequent BM biopsy in 2 pts. No pts experienced grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity. New onset grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia were seen in 12 (50%; of which 5 had a 2+ grade change) and 8 (31%) pts, respectively. The med overall survival is 15.1+ mos. 7 pts have died: pneumonia (n=3), sepsis (n=2), progression to AML (n=1), and transition to hospice (n=1). The AZA was started in cycle 4 in 12 pts (50%). The AZA was started earlier due to leukocytosis or increased blasts in 11 pts (46%), in cycle 1 (n=6), cycle 2 (n=4), and cycle 3 (n=1). 13 pts have discontinued protocol therapy due to leukocytosis (n=6), progression to AML (n=1), lack of response (n=3), pneumothorax (n=1), stem cell transplant (n=1), and loss of insurance (n=1), respectively. Conclusion: Concomitant administration of RUX with AZA was feasible and effective in pts with MDS/MPNs, with expected myelosuppression as the only significant toxicity. This combination warrants further evaluation. Table 1. Baseline characteristics (N = 24) Characteristic N (%) / [range] Med age, years 71 [55 - 79] Prior treatment 9 (38) Diagnosis MDS/MPN-U CMML aCML 11 (46) 10 (42) 3 (12) MF - DIPSS Int-1/ Int-2/ High 4(17)/ 11(46) / 9(37) MDS - IPSS Low/ Int-1/ Int-2/ High 9(38) /12(50) / 2(8) / 1(4) Splenomegaly 12 (50) Med WBC x 109/L 26.3 [3 - 123.2] Peripheral blood blasts >/= 1% 17 (71%) LDH 1040 [409 - 3567] EUMNET fibrosis grade MF-1/ MF-2/ MF-3 10(42)/ 6(26)/ 1(4) JAK2 + 6 (25) Med JAK2 allele burden 42.2 [3 - 90] Karyotype Diploid Abnormal 18 (75) 6 (25) 28-gene molecular panel in 23 pts*, (1 pt not done) ASXL1 DNMT3A TET2 KRAS/NRAS PTPN11 IDH 2 4 (17) 4 (17) 3 (13) 2(8) / 2(8) 2(8) 2 (8) *Mutations identified in only 1 pt included EZH2, GATA2, RUNX1, MPL, KIT. Table 2. Response evaluation by the MDS/MPN IWG 2015 criteria Response category Evaluable pts Responders/Evaluable (%) *All responses, some pts have > 1 response All 12/24 (50) Clinical improvement (CI) spleen Pts with palpable spleen > 5 cm 8/11 (73) CI total symptom score Pts with baseline TSS > 20 3/12 (25) CI Hemoglobin (HGB) Baseline HGB < 10 g/dL 1/7 (15) CI Transfusion independence History of transfusion dependence 1/5 (20) Partial marrow response Baseline and follow-up BMs 5/11 (45) Optimal marrow response Baseline and follow-up BMs 1/11 (9) *No CR or PR documented Disclosures Daver: ImmunoGen: Other: clinical trial, Research Funding. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy. Pemmaraju:Stemline: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy, Honoraria. DiNardo:Novartis: Research Funding. Konopleva:Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Stemline: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Threshold: Research Funding.

Download Full-text