Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with High Risk Multiple Myeloma: Post- Transplant Responses Do Not Translate to Longer Survival

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease with a heterogeneous clinical course, somewhat explained by the occurrence of high-risk prognostic markers. The International Myeloma Working Group defined high risk myeloma (HRM) as the presence of del17p13 or t(4;14) with ISS II/III. Conflicting data exist regarding t(14;16), hypodiploidy and chromosome 1 abnormalities (1q21 amplification, 1p deletion and others). Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of 142 HRM patients with high risk FISH or cytogenetic findings reported to the CIBMTR from 2008-2012 treated with an upfront (within 12 months of diagnosis), melphalan-conditioned autologous hematopoietic cell transplant and compared them to 573 patients with no high-risk markers (NHRM). Patients that received more than 2 induction regimens were excluded in this analysis. The HRM cohort comprised del17p13 (n=27), t(4;14) (n=27), t(14;16) (n=5), chromosome 1 abnormalities (n=42), hypodiploidy (n=13) and ≥2 high-risk markers (n=31). Planned post-transplant therapy was collected. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The HRM and NHRM groups were similar to each other except for the following differences: HRM was associated with lower Karnofsky (KPS) (49% vs 36% with KPS<90, p 0.02) and higher stage at diagnosis (41% vs 28% with ISS/DSS III, p 0.008). More HRM patients received induction with bortezomib and immunomodulatory drug (imid) combinations (55% vs 43%, p <0.001) and had a lower complete response rate prior to transplant (12% vs 16%, p 0.04). More HRM patients had planned post-transplant combined bortezomib and imid therapy (27% vs 12%, p<0.0001). Median follow up in the 2 groups was 36 months for HRM and 44 months for NHRM. At 100 days post-transplant, similar numbers of patients had achieved complete and very good partial responses in the 2 groups (Table 1). At 3 years post-transplant, HRM patients had lower PFS (36% vs 50%, p <0.001) and OS (73% vs 85%, p <0.001) compared to NHRM. Univariate outcomes are shown in Table 2 divided by type of HRM. Table 3 shows the results of the multivariate analysis. The figure shows the Kaplan-Meier curves of probability of survival. Among the relapsed patients (HRM = 91, NHRM = 296), the 2 year survival was 48 (35-60)% for HRM and 70 (64-76)% for the NHRM groups, p-value 0.004. Conclusions: Patients with HRM achieved similar day 100 response compared to NHRM but were unable to maintain this response over time despite being more likely to receive post-transplant therapy. HRM was associated with shorter PFS and further shortened post-relapse survival. Patients with chromosome 1 abnormalities or del 17p alone appeared to have similar outcomes to those with NHRM while those with t(4;14) and those with more than 1 high-risk marker had the least favorable outcomes. In addition to HRM, obtaining less than complete response prior to transplant and the lack of post-transplant therapy were associated with worse PFS and OS. Finally, African-American race and higher stage at diagnosis were also associated with lower OS in our study. Table 1. Day 100 post-transplant response Variable HRM NHRM P-value Day 100 response 0.55 sCR/CR/nCR 40 (28) 176 (31) VGPR 43 (30) 174 (30) PR 39 (27) 129 (23) SD/NR 14 (10) 63 (11) Progression/relapse 5 (4) 13 (2) Missing 1 (<1) 18 (3) Table 2. Outcomes at 3 years post-transplant. Values are expressed as probabilities with 95% confidence intervals. NHRM t(4;14) del 17p Chr 1 ≥ 2 HR p-value PFS 50 (46-55)% 30 (12-51)% 44 (25-64)% 40 (24-56)% 23 (9-41)% <0.001 OS 85 (81-88)% 58 (36-78)% 81 (60-95)% 87 (74-96)% 65 (47-82)% <0.001 Table 3. Multivariate analysis Outcome Hazard ratio (95% CI) p-value PFS HRM vs NHRM 1.7 (1.3-2.3) <0.0001 Pre-transplant CR PR SD Progression 1 2.1 (1.2-3.7) 2.0 (0.8-5.0) 4.5 (1.9-10.3) 0.0245 0.008 0.14 0.0003 Planned post-transplant therapy vs no therapy 0.6 (0.4-0.8) <0.0001 OS HRM vs NHRM 2.0 (1.4-3.0) 0.0001 African-American race vs Caucasian 1.7 (1.1-2.5) 0.007 ISS/DSS III Yes vs No 1.8 (1.2-2.5) 0.0008 Pre-transplant CR PR SD Progression 1 1.4 (1.0-1.9) 1.8 (1.0-3.0) 2.7 (1.5-4.8) 0.008 0.03 0.02 0.0004 Planned post-transplant therapy vs no therapy 0.5 (0.3-0.8) 0.0001 Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Krishnan: Onyx: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy. Gasparetto:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Hypogammaglobulinemia during Rituximab Maintenance after Transplantation Is a Surrogate Marker for Disease Control in Patients with Mantle-Cell Lymphoma, an Analysis from the LyMa Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139990 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 42-42

Author(s):

Louise Bouard ◽

Catherine Thieblemont ◽

Krimo Bouabdallah ◽

Thomas Gastinne ◽

Anne Moreau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Immune Deficiency ◽

Disease Control ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

P Value ◽

Immune Recovery ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Rituximab Maintenance ◽

Mantle Cell

Introduction Rituximab maintenance (RM) (375mg/m2 per infusion every 2 months for 3 years) in transplanted patients with mantle-cell lymphomas (MCL) prolongs disease control (LyMa trial, Le Gouill et al NEJM; NCT00921414). However, post-transplant RM might also induce long-term immune deficiency and thus increases risk of infection. To address these issues, we performed an ancillary pre-planned study based on the LyMa trial, a phase III trial that compared RM versus observation (Obs) after ASCT in MCL patients. We compared post-transplant immune-deficiency and its impact on PFS and OS in the RM vs Obs groups. Method All transplanted and randomized patients enrolled in the LyMa trial were eligible for the present study. The following data were collected during the post-ASCT period and monitored according to protocol procedure: febrile event, clinically documented infection, hospitalization for infection, neutropenia, hypogammaglobulinemia and T CD4 lymphocytes count. We also retrospectively collected the use of immune globulin (Ig) substitution. In the LyMa trial, patients were randomized between RM vs Obs after transplantation. To decipher the implication of ASCT or RM in immune recovery, treatment periods were divided in 4: < 6 months after randomization, from 6 to 12 months after randomization, from one to two year after randomization, and from 2 to 3 years after randomization (respectively periods A, B, C and D). Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used as appropriate to investigate differences between arms in each treatment period. For all tests, a two-sided p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant Results 240 patients were eligible, 120 in each arm. Patients' characteristics at diagnosis and inclusion were similar in the two arms. Number of hospitalizations due to infections was not statistically different in RM vs Obs in all periods. As previously shown, grade 3/4 infections incidence did not differ in the 2 arms. However, febrile events were more frequent in the RM arm (32 pts vs 11; 38 events vs 12) but this was statistically significant only in C and D periods; p=0,03 for the 2 periods. In all, 51 infections in 44 pts were reported in Obs vs 127 events in 82 pts in RM arm. This difference was also only statistically significant during the C period, p=0,001. Grade 4 neutropenia incidence and T CD4 count did not differ between the two arms in all tested periods. Hypogammaglobulinemia was statistically more frequent in RM during C and D periods (p=0,0001 and p< 0,0001, respectively). Mean level of gammaglobulinemia on D period was 6,50 g/L (range 0,6-11,7) in obs arm versus 4,99 (range 1,0-9,5) in RM arm (p< 0,0001). 36 pts in RM arm vs 10 pts in obs arm were substituted with Ig and the difference was statistically significant only in period D, p<0,0001. Febrile and infectious episodes; neutropenia and T CD 4 lymphopenia did not modify PFS and OS. Patients with gammaglobulinemia < 6g/L in RM arm and in the whole cohort had longer PFS compared to pts who did not present hypogammaglobulinemia : 3-years PFS 93,2% vs 63,5% in RM arm HR = 0,294, 95% CI (0,113-0,767 and), p=0,01 and 3-years PFS 85,6% vs 63,6% in the whole cohort, HR adjusted on treatment arm=0,488 95% CI (0,287-0,830), p=0,008 . PFS was not modified by gammaglobulin level in the Obs arm and it did not modified OS in both arms. We performed a multivariate analysis to determine which data were predictive of infectious events and delayed immune recovery (neutropenia, hypogamma, T CD 4 lymphopenia). This included all univariate parameters with p value < 0,2, among clinical and biological characteristics at diagnosis, response after induction and number of rituximab injections. Interestingly, among others expected parameters, complete response assessed by TDM was predictive of hypogamma with Odd Ratio 2,972 (1,263-6,994) p=0,0126. No value was predictive of neutropenia or T CD4 cytopenia. Conclusion As compared to observation, the use of post-transplant RM does not increase risk of neutropenia and T CD4 lymphopenia. However febrile and infectious events, hypogammaglobulinemia and Ig substitution are more frequent after one year post transplantation. Hypogamma < 6g/L is associated with longer PFS and complete morphologic response. This suggests that hypogammaglobulinemia could be a surrogate for disease response quality and duration. Our findings deserve to be confirmed. Disclosures Thieblemont: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Cellectis: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria; University Employement: Current Employment. Bouabdallah:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oberic:Roche, Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Honoraria; Roche, Janssen: Consultancy. Hermine:AB Science: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celgene BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Alexion: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy. Le Gouill:Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Consultancy; Roche Genentech, Janssen-Cilag and Abbvie, Celgene, Jazz pharmaceutical, Gilead-kite, Loxo, Daiichi-Sankyo and Servier: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL0434: Successful Disease Control without Cranial Radiation in Newly Diagnosed T Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113481 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1000-1000 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Robert James Hayashi ◽

Stuart S. Winter ◽

Kimberly P. Dunsmore ◽

Meenakshi Devidas ◽

Brent Wood ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Complete Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Patients ◽

To Receive ◽

Standard Risk

Abstract Background: COG AALL0434 evaluated the safety and efficacy of a multi agent chemotherapy backbone containing Capizzi based methotrexate/pegaspargase in newly diagnosed T-LL patients. High-risk patients were randomized to receive the COG augmented BFM (ABFM) regimen with or without Nelarabine. This was part of a larger trial including T-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) patients featuring a 2 x 2 pseudo-factorial randomization at the end of induction using the COG ABFM regimen with a randomization of Capizzi MTX/pegaspargase (C-MTX) verses high dose MTX and a randomization with or without Nelarabine (Nel). Methods: AALL0434 enrolled 277 patients with T-LL (2010-2014). Patients were assigned to two risk categories based upon the degree of bone marrow involvement at diagnosis: (≥1%, High Risk, <1% Standard Risk), and the ability to achieve at least a partial response at the end of induction. Patients with prior steroid treatment were assigned to the high risk group. Both groups were treated using the ABFM C-MTX regimen. High-risk patients were randomized to receive or not receive six, 5-day courses of Nel 650 mg/m2/day. No patients received prophylactic cranial radiation and CNS3 patients were ineligible. Response criteria included, Complete Response (CR): disappearance, Complete Response unconfirmed (CRu): >75% reduction, Partial Response (PR): >50% reduction, of all measurable disease, all without new lesions. Results: At the end of induction, 98.9% of the evaluable patients achieved at least a partial response (30.7% CR, 34.7% CRu, 33.5% PR). For all T-LL patients, the 4-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 87.0 +/- 2.1% and 90.0+/-1.8%. The 4-year Disease Free Survival (DFS) from end of induction was 90.0+/- 2.1%. There was no difference in DFS observed between the high risk and standard risk groups, (p=0.25) or by treatment regimen (p=0.31). Nel did not show an advantage for high-risk T-LL patients, with 4-year DFS 85.0 +/- 5.6% with Nel (N=60) vs 89.0 +/- 4.7% without Nel (N=58) (p=0.28). Neither stage nor tumor response at the end of four weeks of induction therapy resulted in differences in EFS (p= 0.34 and p= 0.22, respectively). Minimal detectable disease (MDD) of the bone marrow at diagnosis (<0.1%, 0.1-0.99%, >1.0%), used to establish the risk assignment for this trial, failed to demonstrate thresholds at diagnosis that resulted in differences in EFS (p=0.27). Relapse involving the CNS only occurred in 4 patients (1.4%). Overall toxicity and neurotoxicity was acceptable and not significantly different than that experienced from the ALL cohort. There was one observed second malignancy and 5 deaths not from progressive disease. Conclusion: COG AALL0434 produced excellent outcomes in one of the largest trials ever conducted for patients with newly diagnosed T-LL. The COG ABFM regimen with C-MTX provides excellent disease control regardless of stage, or the degree of disease involvement of the bone marrow at diagnosis. Nelarabine did not show an improvement in the outcome, although the trial was underpowered to address this specific question. Disclosures Teachey: Amgen: Consultancy; La Roche: Consultancy. Bollard:Torque: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Neximmune: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

A Phase IB Study of Blinatumomab (blina) in Patients with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) As Post-Allogeneic Blood or Marrow Transplant (allo-BMT) Remission Maintenance

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128255 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 778-778

Author(s):

Jonathan Webster ◽

Richard F. Ambinder ◽

Richard J. Jones ◽

Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽

Gabrielle T. Prince ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase Ib ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Remission Maintenance

Background: AlloBMT can be curative as consolidation for high risk B ALL and NHL. However, long term survival is limited by transplant-related toxicity and particularly by disease relapse. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis limits GVHD and facilitates the use of alternative allograft sources. Moreover, following PTCy, cellular immune reconstitution is favorable for the integration of strategies to augment anti-tumor immunity. Blina, a CD19/CD3 bispecific T cell engager antibody construct, is effective in the treatment of CD19+ ALL and NHL. Blina leads to T cell activation that may enhance established posttransplant tumor-specific T cell responses, leading to a more potent graft-versus-tumor effect. Thus, we have undertaken a phase Ib trial to assess the tolerability and preliminary efficacy of blina as post-alloBMT remission maintenance in B-cell ALL and NHL. Methods: Patients ³18 years-old with high risk CD19+ B ALL or NHL who underwent alloBMT using PTCy were eligible including those with prior blina exposure. Patients had to be 60-180 days from transplant with documented count recovery and no evidence of disease progression. Patients had to be off all post-transplant immunosuppression including steroids for the treatment of GVHD for ≥4 weeks prior to treatment initiation, and without a history of grade ≥3 acute GVHD or severe chronic GVHD. Patients could receive two cycles of blina if they had evidence of disease (including MRD) at their pre- and/or post-transplant evaluations but otherwise received only one cycle. Blina was given as a continuous infusion at 9 mcg/day on C1D1-7 and 28 mcg/day on C1D8-28 and C2D1-28. Results: As of July 23, 2019, 12 adults (10 males/2 females) have enrolled including 4 patients with B ALL and 8 patients with NHL. Among the B ALL patients, two with known TP53 mutations were transplanted in CR1, while two with relapsed disease were transplanted in CR3. Among the NHL patients, five had large cell transformation (3 from follicular and 2 from CLL); one had relapsed primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL); one had relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); and one had diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The median age was 53 (range, 30-73). All patients underwent alloBMT using a conditioning regimen of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation (TBI). Eight patients received allografts from haploidentical donors, three from matched-unrelated donors, and one from a matched-related donor. Five patients received peripheral blood allografts, and seven bone marrow. Two patients were enrolled after a second alloBMT, and 3/4 ALL patients previously received blina. Baseline characteristics are presented in Figure 1. Patients started blina a median of 144 days post-transplant (range, 90-180). One patient stopped treatment on day 5 due to a grade 2 tremor, and one patient required dose reduction on day 25 due to grade 4 neutropenia. Toxicities were otherwise mild and are presented in Figure 2. There were no exacerbations of GVHD. At a median follow-up of 13.7 months after BMT (range 3.8-23 months), ten patients remain in remission, while one patient suffered a third CNS relapse of ALL at 20.6 months after his 2nd transplant and another had relapse of his transformed lymphoma. Data on biomarkers including changes in T cell subpopulations in both BM and PB, and co-signaling molecule expression will be presented. Conclusions: Post-alloBMT maintenance therapy with blina is feasible with minimal toxicity. 83% of the very high risk patients treated on study remain in CR at a median of 13.7 months post-transplant. Based on promising safety and efficacy data from the phase IB, the plan is to proceed to the phase II portion of the study. Disclosures Webster: Amgen: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Wagner-Johnston:Jannsen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Luznik:Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; WindMiL Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Patent holder. Gojo:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Amphivena: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Blinatumomab is not labeled for use as post-transplant maintenance therapy or for use in the non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (VRD) Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma; The Mayo Clinic Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111147 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2147-2147

Author(s):

M Hasib Sidiqi ◽

Mohammed A Aljama ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Eli Muchtar ◽

Francis K. Buadi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Mayo Clinic ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Standard Risk

Abstract We retrospectively reviewed all patients receiving bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone induction followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) within 12 months of diagnosis for multiple myeloma at the Mayo Clinic. 243 patients treated between January 2010 and April of 2017 were included in the study. Median age was 61 (interquartile range, 55-67) with 62% of patients being male. High risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA) were present in 34% of patients. 166 (68%) patients received some form of maintenance/other therapy post transplant (no maintenance (NM, n=77), lenalidomide maintenance (LM, n=108), bortezomib maintenance (BM, n=39) and other therapy (OT, n=19)). Overall response rate was 99% with complete response (CR) rate of 42% and 62% at day 100 and time of best response post transplant respectively. The four cohorts categorized by post transplant therapy were well matched for age, gender and ISS stage. HRA were more common amongst patients receiving bortezomib maintenance or other therapy post transplant (NM 18% vs LM 22% vs BM 68% vs OT 79%, p<0.0001). Two year and five year overall survival rates were 90% and 67% respectively with an estimated median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of 96 months and 28 months respectively for the whole cohort. OS was not significantly different when stratified by post-transplant therapy (Median OS 96 months for NM vs not reached for LM vs 62 months for BM vs not reached for OT, p=0.61), however post-transplant therapy was predictive of PFS (median PFS 23 months for NM vs 34 months for LM vs 28 months for BM vs 76 months for OT, p=0.01). High risk cytogenetics was associated with a worse OS but not PFS when compared to patients with standard risk (median OS: not reached for standard risk vs 60 months for HRA, p=0.0006; median PFS: 27 months for standard risk vs 22 months for HRA, p=0.70). In patients that did not receive maintenance therapy presence of HRA was a strong predictor of OS and PFS (median OS: not reached for standard risk vs 36 months for HRA, p<0.0001; median PFS: 24 months for standard risk vs 7 months for HRA, p<0.0001). Patients receiving maintenance therapy appeared to have a similar PFS and OS irrespective of cytogenetics (median OS: not reached for standard risk vs 62 months for HRA, p=0.14; median PFS: 35 months for standard risk vs 34 months for HRA, p=0.79).On multivariable analysis ISS stage III and achieving CR/stringent CR predicted PFS whilst the only independent predictors of OS were presence of HRA and achieving CR/stringent CR. The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone followed by ASCT is a highly effective regimen producing deep and durable responses in many patients. Maintenance therapy in this cohort may overcome the poor prognostic impact of high risk cytogenetic abnormalities. Table Table. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Dingli:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kumar:KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gertz:Abbvie: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; annexon: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; Prothena: Honoraria; spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy; Ionis: Honoraria; Teva: Consultancy; Alnylam: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Risk Factors Associated with Survival Outcome in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia in Accelerated Phase Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1222.1222 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1222-1222

Author(s):

Kee Yon, Lionel See ◽

Kok Chong Bernard Yap ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Hein Than ◽

Yeow-Tee Goh

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

P Value ◽

Survival Curves ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Kaplan Meier

Abstract Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) is a triphasic disease which typically presents in chronic phase with risk of progression to more aggressive phases in a certain proportion of patients. Accelerated Phase (AP), as described in the pre-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) era by Kantarjian et al in 1988, is an intermediate stage with a poor median overall survival (OS) of ≤18 months without haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Since TKI therapy has revolutionized CML treatment, a significantly improved OS has been seen in most CML patients, including those in AP. Not all CML-AP patients require HSCT upfront nowadays and many are able to achieve major molecular remission (MMR) and favourable OS on TKI therapy. However, updated classifications of CML-AP by the World Health Organization (WHO) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) do not reflect these significant advances in the TKI era. There is a need to re-evaluate the CML-AP classification that will have an impact on treatment decisions for CML-AP patients. In this study, we explored the association between various haematological parameters at diagnosis and the probabilities of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) of CML-AP patients on TKI therapy. Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) trends of 75 newly diagnosed CML-AP patients treated with frontline TKIs between 2000 to 2013 from Singapore General Hospital and Seoul St. Mary's Hospital in South Korea were retrospectively analysed with regards to demographic and haematological parameters, such as cell counts from serum and bone marrow at diagnosis, using cox proportional hazards analysis. Survival was also compared using log-rank test with Bonferroni corrections between CML-AP patients and 227 CML Chronic Phase (CML-CP) high-risk Sokal and 34 Blast Crisis (CML-BC) patients on TKI-based therapy. OS was defined as duration from diagnosis of CML-AP to death from any reason. PFS was defined as duration from disease diagnosis to the first occurrence of progression or death due to CML. As a whole, CML-AP patients treated with frontline TKI had survival that paralleled CML-CP high-risk Sokal patients (p-value = 0.694 for OS, p-value = 0.258 for PFS). Most of the death and progression occurred less than 3 years of starting TKI therapy (69.2% for OS, 84.6% for PFS). Multivariable analysis in CML-AP patients showed that male gender, bone marrow (BM) blasts ≥10% and clonal chromosomal abnormalities (CCAs) at diagnosis were associated with poor OS (Hazard Ratio (HR) 18.53, p-value = 0.013; HR 1.16, p-value = 0.010; HR 5.05, p-value = 0.044, respectively) and poor PFS (HR 12.96, p-value = 0.021; HR 1.17, p-value = 0.007; HR 8.84.05, p-value = 0.008, respectively). CML-AP patients with all 3 of these risk factors experienced the worst OS compared to those with 1 or zero risk factors (p-value <0.001). Patients with all 3 risk factors also had the poorest PFS compared to those with 2, 1 and zero risk factors (p-value = 0.022, <0.001, <0.001 respectively; figure 1). CML-AP Patients with 2 risk factors or less, had OS and PFS probabilities comparable to CML-CP patients with high-risk Sokal score (p-value = 0.082 for OS, p-value= 0.813 for PFS, figure 2 and 3 respectively). However, CML-AP patients with all 3 risk factors showed inferior OS and PFS probabilities similar to CML-BC patients (p-value = 0.799 for OS, p-value = 0.624 for PFS; figure 2 and 3 respectively). Our findings suggested that CML-AP was a heterogeneous group with varying survival probabilities on TKI therapy. Male gender, BM blasts ≥10% and CCAs at diagnosis were risk factors shown to be predictive of survival probabilities, and identified a high-risk sub-group among CML-AP patients with inferior OS and PFS rates similar to CML-BC patients. Aggressive chemotherapeutic strategies including HSCT should be warranted in these patients. However, TKI therapy alone with close molecular surveillance may be a reasonable option for optimally responding low-risk CML-AP patients who are not eligible for HSCT. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PFS according to stratification of the number of risk factors present in CML-AP patients. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PFS according to stratification of the number of risk factors present in CML-AP patients. Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for OS according to phases of CML with AP patients separated by number of risk factors present. Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for OS according to phases of CML with AP patients separated by number of risk factors present. Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PFS according to phases of CML with AP patients separated by number of risk factors present. Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PFS according to phases of CML with AP patients separated by number of risk factors present. Disclosures Kim: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Goh:BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention with Semuloparin in Cancer Patients Initiating Chemotherapy: Benefit-Risk Assessment by VTE Risk in SAVE-ONCO

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.206.206 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 206-206 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Daniel George ◽

Giancarlo Agnelli ◽

William Fisher ◽

Ajay Kakkar ◽

Michael R Lassen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Assessment ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

P Value ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Benefit Risk Assessment ◽

Bayer Healthcare ◽

High Risk Cancer

Abstract Abstract 206 Background: Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy are at increased risk for VTE. Recent oncology guidelines emphasize the need for randomized studies with VTE risk assessment in these patients (Streiff MB, et al. JNCCN. 2011;9:714–777). Semuloparin is a new ultra-low-molecular-weight heparin with high anti-factor Xa and minimal anti-factor IIa activities. The SAVE-ONCO study investigated semuloparin vs placebo for VTE prevention in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with metastatic or locally advanced cancer of lung, pancreas, stomach, colon-rectum, bladder or ovary initiating a chemotherapy course, were randomized to once-daily subcutaneous semuloparin 20 mg or placebo until change of chemotherapy. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, any non-fatal pulmonary embolism, or VTE-related death. The main safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding (major and non major). Baseline VTE risk was assessed by a score specifically developed and validated in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients (Khorana AA, et al. Blood. 2008;111:4902–7). According to this predictive model a score of 2 was assigned to very high-risk cancer sites (pancreatic or gastric), a score of 1 was assigned to high-risk cancer sites (lung, ovarian, or bladder cancer) and 1 is added to the score for each of the following parameters: platelet count ≥350 × 109/L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL and/or use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents, leukocyte count >11 × 109/L, and body mass index ≥35 kg/m2. Results: Among the 3212 patients randomized, the majority had lung (36.6%) or colorectal (28.9%) cancer and approximately two-thirds had metastatic cancer. In total, 550 (17.4%) of patients enrolled were at high risk of VTE, 1998 (63.2%) were at moderate risk, and 614 (19.4%) were at low risk (VTE risk score of ≥ 3, 1–2, or 0 points, respectively). All risk groups were well balanced between the treatment groups. Median treatment duration was approximately 3.5 months. Overall, semuloparin significantly reduced VTE or VTE-related death by 64% (p<0.0001; Table) vs placebo. The treatment effect was consistent across various levels of VTE risk (interaction p-value=0.6048; Table). Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 2.8% and 2.0% of the patients in the semuloparin and placebo groups, respectively (Table). The incidence of major bleeding was similar: 1.2% and 1.1% patients in the semuloparin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–1.99). No increased incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was observed with semuloparin vs placebo across various levels of VTE risk (interaction p-value=0.9409; Table). Conclusions: In cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, thromboprophylaxis with semuloparin was consistently associated with a favorable benefit-risk profile across various levels of VTE risk, but greatest in moderate to high risk patients. Antithrombotic prophylaxis should be considered in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy, particularly in those who are at moderate to high risk of VTE. Disclosures: George: Viamet: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Medivation: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ipsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Dendreon: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; GSK: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Research Funding; Exelixis: Research Funding. Agnelli:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; sanofi-aventis: Honoraria. Fisher:Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; sanofi-aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kakkar:Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ARYx Therapeutics: Consultancy; Canyon: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria. Lassen:Astellas Pharma Europe: Consultancy; Bayer HealthCare AG: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Merck Serono: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Protola Pharma: Consultancy; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy. Mismetti:sanofi-aventis: served as a member of Steering Committees. Mouret:Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Honoraria; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lawson:Sanofi: Employment. Turpie:Astellas Pharma Europe: Consultancy; Bayer HealthCare AG: Consultancy; Portola Pharma: Consultancy; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Similar Efficacy and Safety of CT-P10 and Reference Rituximab in Patients with Advanced Stage Follicular Lymphoma: Updated Phase III Study Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112716 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1616-1616

Author(s):

Won-Seog Kim ◽

Christian Buske ◽

Larry W Kwak ◽

Michinori Ogura ◽

Bertrand Coiffier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Complete Response ◽

P Value ◽

Maintenance Period ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Duration Of Response

Abstract Background: CT-P10 is an approved biosimilar to the innovator rituximab (RTX) from many countries including European Union based in part on the pharmacokinetics (PK) equivalence and comparable efficacy in patients with previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) when treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) as an induction therapy (Coiffier B et al. ASH 2016; Kim WS et al. ASCO 2017). Objective: We report here the updated efficacy outcomes including progression free survival (PFS), duration of response, overall survival (OS), as well as updated safety profile of CT-P10 compared to RTX in advanced FL patients with median follow-up duration of 23 months including the Maintenance Period with rituximab monotherapy. Methods: These results were derived from an ongoing randomized and double-blind study in patients with previously untreated advanced FL (NCT02162771). A total of 140 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio and 124 patients completed 8 cycles of R-CVP induction therapy. One-hundred twenty two patients (62 patients in CT-P10 group and 60 patients in RTX group), who showed response during the Induction Period, entered the Maintenance Period where a total of 12 cycles of rituximab monotherapy was to be administered every 2 months. The study was planned to continue until death or up to 3 years from the randomized date of the last patient. Kaplan Meier (KM) method was used to estimate PFS, duration of response, and OS. Results: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics; overall median age of 58 years, 55% female, 57% with FLIPI score ≥3, 100% with Stage III/IV, 18% with bulky disease (≥7cm) and 26% with B-Symptom. As of the cut-off date for investigator-assessed PFS, duration of response and OS, median follow-up was 23 months (range, 0.5-34) in the CT-P10 group and 22 months (range, 0.2-33) in the RTX group. The proportion of patients who had experienced relapse, disease progression or death from any cause was 22.9% (16/70) and 24.3% (17/70) for the CT-P10 and RTX groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between CT-P10 and RTX groups in PFS (log rank, p-value: 0.806) with 2-year PFS of 75.2% and 73.5%, respectively (Figure 1). In terms of sustained response, the proportions of patient who showed relapse or disease progression after achieving overall response (Complete Response, unconfirmed Complete Response, or Partial Response) were 19.4% (13/67) in CT-P10 group and 21.3% (13/61) in RTX group, and the KM curves showed no statistically significant difference between CT-P10 and RTX (log rank, p-value: 0.997) (Figure 2). Death from any cause were 5.7% (4/70) and 2.9% (2/70) in the CT-P10 and RTX groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in OS (log rank, p-value: 0.464) between the CT-P10 and RTX groups with 2-year OS of 93.2% and 95.3%, respectively. Overall safety profile of CT-P10 was consistent with that of RTX (Table 1). A similar number of patients in each treatment group experienced at least 1 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) considered to be related to the study drug, infusion-related reaction, and infection. The proportion of patients with positive anti-drug antibody was also similar in both groups (4.3% [3/70] vs 5.7% [4/70] in the CT-P10 and RTX groups). Neither progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy nor Hepatitis B virus reactivation was reported in either group. Conclusion: At the median follow-up duration of 23 months, the updated efficacy data in advanced FL patients demonstrated comparable PFS, sustained response and OS between CT-P10 and RTX. CT-P10 was also well tolerated and its safety profile was similar to that of RTX. The updated safety results did not reveal any trends or new signals noted in the patients treated with CT-P10. Disclosures Kim: Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Buske:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ogura:MeijiSeika Pharma: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundi Pharma: Consultancy; SymBio: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Cellgene: Honoraria. Coiffier:CELGENE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MUNDIPHARMA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELLTRION: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MORPHOSYS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NOVARTIS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Celltrion, Inc: Employment. Kim:Celltrion, Inc: Employment.

Download Full-text

Older Age As a Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival for Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Upfront Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114200 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2144-2144

Author(s):

David M. Cordas Dos Santos ◽

Rima M. Saliba ◽

Romil Patel ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

Chitra Hosing ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Older Age ◽

Stage Ii ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Cart Analysis ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is considered the standard of care for newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Due to improvements in induction, stem cell mobilization, and dose adjustment of the conditioning regimen, auto-HCT is increasingly used in older MM patients, with several retrospective analyses showing similar clinical outcomes compared to younger patients. Methods To further confirm these results, we performed a single-center retrospective analysis of MM patients undergoing auto-HCT between January 2006 and December 2016. Patients were divided into two groups: older (> 70 years) and younger (≤ 70 years). Results 1128 patients (182 older, 946 younger) were included in this analysis. Patient characteristics are summarized in the attached Table. More patients (59% vs. 45%, p = 0.01) in the older cohort had ISS stage II or III disease. Older cohort was more likely to receive reduced-dose melphalan (140 mg/m²) as conditioning regimen (32% vs 3%, p = <0.0001). There was no significant difference in high-risk cytogenetics, induction regimens, and response to induction, or post-transplant maintenance between the older and younger cohorts. The overall median follow-up among survivors was 49 months in the older and 52 months in the younger group. One-hundred-day non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 2/182 (1.1%) and 6/946 (0.6%) (p = 0.5) in the older and younger groups, respectively. However, 1-year NRM was significantly higher in the older vs. younger cohort (7 /182 (4%; unknown 3, pneumonia or respiratory failure 4) vs. 9/946 (1%; unknown 2, pneumonia or respiratory failure 4, cardiac failure 3), HR 4.1, p = 0.005). Post-transplant, 75 (41%) and 431 (45%) achieved complete remission (CR) in the older and younger groups, respectively (p = 0.29). There was no significant difference in the rate of disease progression post-transplant between older (31%) and younger (30%) groups (p = 0.3). The 5-year progression free survival (PFS) was 24% and 37% in the older and younger groups, respectively (HR 1.3, p = 0.02). Similarly, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 56% and 73% in the older and younger groups (HR 1.8, p = <0.001). In univariate analyses, age > 70 years, high-risk cytogenetics, serum creatinine level > 2 mg/dl and ISS stage III were associated with worse PFS and OS. In contrast, melphalan 200 mg/m² for conditioning and achievement of CR after induction therapy were associated with better PFS and OS. These 6 factors were studied in multivariate analyses using a classification and regression tree (CART) method. In CART analysis for PFS, ISS stage II or III, and high-risk cytogenetics were associated with shorter PFS. Similarly, in CART analysis for OS, older age (> 69 years), ISS stage II or III, and high-risk cytogenetics were associated with a shorter OS. Conclusion In this large single-center analysis, there was no difference in 100-day NRM, CR rates and the risk of progression after auto-HCT between the older and the younger patients. However, older age was associated with a shorter PFS and OS due to increased NRM. On multivariate CART analysis, ISS stage II or III and high-risk cytogenetics were associated with a worse PFS and OS, while age > 69 years was associated with a worse OS only. The impact of comorbidities on NRM is being evaluated in ongoing analyses. Disclosures Lee: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai Biopharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patel:Abbvie: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Thomas:Bristol Myers Squibb Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Research Funding; Array Pharma: Research Funding. Orlowski:BioTheryX, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Champlin:Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation for Secondary CNS Lymphoma: A Retrospective Review of 21 Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126253 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3342-3342 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Cole Sterling ◽

Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽

Douglas E Gladstone ◽

Richard F. Ambinder ◽

Lode J. Swinnen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Cns Lymphoma ◽

P Value ◽

Myeloablative Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Term Survival ◽

Cns Disease ◽

Post Transplant

INTRODUCTION: Allogeneic blood or marrow transplant (alloBMT) is widely used in relapsed/refractory systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The graft-versus-tumor effect has been thought to be blunted by the immune privilege of the central nervous system (CNS). Communication between the CNS and the systemic immune system suggests that CNS disease could benefit from the graft versus lymphoma (GVL) effect provided by alloBMT. METHODS: The charts of all patients who received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis between January 2004 and October 2018 were reviewed. Survival statistics were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in time to death between groups were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with systemic lymphoma involving the CNS were identified. The median age was 59 years (range 24-73); 7 were over the age of 60 and 13 were male. Histology types included diffuse large B cell (71%), Burkitt (10%), T cell (10%), follicular (5%), and anaplastic large cell (5%). Prior to transplant, 12 patients were in complete remission, 9 had residual disease, and 5 had residual CNS disease by imaging. Induction therapy included CNS radiation therapy in 11 of 21 patients (52%) and high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in 10 (48%). Only 1 patient was in first remission, with the remaining 20 in second or later remission. All but 1 patient received non-myeloablative conditioning using fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total-body irradiation; the other patient received busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Fifteen patients (71%) had haploidentical donors. Graft source was bone marrow in 18 patients and G-CSF-stimulated peripheral blood in 3. Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 1375 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 184-NR) and median progression free survival (PFS) was 1375 days (95% CI 112-NR). Three-year overall survival was 51% (95% CI 27-71%). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 29% (95% CI 9-49%) at 3 years, and non-relapse mortality was 20% (95% CI 2-38%) at 1 year. Of the 6 patients who relapsed, 2 were CNS only, 2 were systemic only, and 2 were combined CNS / systemic. There were 2 cases of grade III-IV acute GVHD and 1 case of chronic GVHD involving the mouth. Univariable analysis revealed no predictors of survival in our small data set: age > 60 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48, 95% CI 0.42-5.29, p-value 0.54), haploidentical donor (HR 4.2, 95% CI 0.53-33.66, p-value 0.17), residual disease (HR 1.3, CI 0.37-4.52, p-value 0.68), and prior CNS radiation (HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.42-5.31, p-value 0.53). DISCUSSION: Allogeneic BMT with non-myeloablative conditioning is potentially curative in patients with secondary CNS lymphoma. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide is well tolerated in this older group. Myeloablative conditioning directed at the CNS is not required for long-term survival. Given its biologic plausibility and potential as a viable treatment option in certain patient populations, the role of alloBMT in CNS lymphoma deserves further investigation. Figure Disclosures Wagner-Johnston: ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Swinnen:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

The Role of Bortezomib-Containing Regimens in Improving Response in Patients with Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2713.2713 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2713-2713

Author(s):

Ranjit Banwait ◽

Edie Weller ◽

Nitin Ropur ◽

Claudia E. Paba-Prada ◽

Lina Benajiba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Staging System ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Low Risk ◽

P Value ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 2713 INTRODUCTION: Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare low-grade lymphoma characterized by the presence of lymphoplasmacytic cells in the bone marrow. Several clinical trials have shown that bortezomib has high activity in patients with WM. Bortezomib has also been indicated for patients with high-risk disease in multiple myeloma, a related plasma cell dyscrasia. We sought to investigate the role of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, in overall response rate compared to other non-bortezomib containing regimens in patients with WM. In addition, we examined the role of the international staging system for WM (ISS-WM) at the time of initial therapy compared to the time of relapsed disease in this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 182 WM patients enrolled on various clinical trials at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between November 2000 to October 2009. Patient were stratified as newly diagnosed/upfront (n=86) or relapsed (n=96) according to their disease status at the time of entry into clinical trial. Patient medical records were studied to gather information on demographics, initial diagnosis, disease staging by ISS-WM (at initial therapy and at the time of relapsed disease), prior medical history including prior lines of therapies, types of therapies, and best response on clinical trial (PR or better). RESULTS: Among the 182 patients, 112 (62%) were female and 86 (47%) patient were previously untreated, while 96 (53%) had at least one prior line of treatment; 44(24%) had 1 line, 29(16%) had 2 lines, and 23(13%) had 3 or more lines of therapy. Both the upfront and relapsed groups had a median age of 63 yrs (range, 42–86 and 43–81 respectively). Based on the Morel ISS-WM study, 49 (27%) patients were high risk, 71 (39%) were intermediate risk, and 62 (34%) were low risk. In the upfront setting, 75% (24/32) of patients on a bortezomib containing regimen responded with a PR or better, while 80% (43/54) of patients not receiving bortezomib containing regimen responded with a PR or better (p-value=0.79). When looking at ISS-WM staging and bortezomib-containing regimen in the upfront setting, patients who received bortezomib as their initial therapy and were low risk by ISS-WM staging had a response rate of 73% (8/11), while those who had non-bortezomib containing regimen as their initial therapy and were low risk by ISS-WM staging had a response rate of 82% (14/17). Similarly, patients who received bortezomib as their initial therapy and were intermediate/high risk by ISS-WM staging achieved a response rate of 76% (16/21), while those who had a non-bortezomib containing regimen achieved a response rate of 78% (29/37). We further explored the role of bortezomib in patients who received a bortezomib-containing regimen in the relapsed setting. Of the 96 relapsed patients, 55% (18/33) of patients on a bortezomib containing regiment responded with a PR or better, while only 33% (21/63) of patients not receiving bortezomib containing regimen responded with a PR or better (p=0.05). Furthermore, when assessing response rate by ISS-WM and regimen containing bortezomib in relapsed setting, low risk patients by ISS-WM who received bortezomib had a response rate of 60% (6/10), while those with non-bortezomib containing regimen and low risk by ISS-WM had a response rate of 42% (10/24, p-value=0.45). Similarly, patients with intermediate/high risk by ISS-WM staging who received bortezomib had a response rate of 52% (12/23), while those who received a non-bortezomib containing regimen had a response rare of 28% (11/39, p-value=0.10). CONCLUSION: The results of this analysis indicate that bortezomib can improve response rate (PR or better) in patients in the relapsed setting. In the upfront setting, bortezomib had a similar activity to other therapeutic agents, suggesting that a novel agent such as bortezomib can achieve similar response rate to standard therapies including cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. Moreover, patients in the relapsed setting who received bortezomib and were low or intermediate/high risk by ISS-WM staging showed a high response rate compared to those who did not receive bortezomib and were low or intermediate/high ISS staging system, though the numbers did not reach statistical difference. Based on this study, larger prospective studies to evaluate the role of bortezomib as a factor in overcoming poor prognostic features in the relapsed setting are warranted. Disclosures: Treon: Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria. Ghobrial:Noxxon: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Noxxon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text