Prothrombin Complex Concentrate or Idarucizumab in a Multimodal Hemostatic Approach with Tranexamic Acid and Fibrinogen for the Acute Reversal of Dabigatran

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2275-2275
Author(s):  
Oliver Grottke ◽  
Markus Honickel ◽  
Rolf Rossaint ◽  
Till Braunschweig
Keyword(s):  
Liver Injury ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prothrombin Complex Concentrate ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Coagulation Parameters ◽  
Hemostatic Therapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background: Reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation in traumatized patients with massive bleeding using idarucizumab (IDA) or prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) together with other resuscitation measures will be first line treatment. In cases of continuous bleeding and/or elevated dabigatran levels, further hemostatic therapy with coagulation factors (tranexamic acid: TX, fibrinogen concentrate: FGN) may be required. This study tested the safety and efficacy of IDA or PCC, given as first or second line therapy in a two hit polytrauma model under dabigatran anticoagulation. A multimodal approach using TX plus FGN was also tested. In addition to the primary endpoint, reduction in blood loss (BL), a panel of coagulation parameters and the safety of these hemostatic measurements was investigated. Methods: Dabigatran etexilate (30 mg/kg bid) was given to 28 male pigs for 3 days after ethical approval. On day 4, pigs were anesthetized and given a dabigatran infusion before blunt liver injury and bilateral femur fractures. Animals were randomized to receive either 60 mg/kg IDA or 50 U/kg PCC after the first injury. One hour later these animals received the opposite treatment post second liver injury. In a second step, TX (20 mg/kg) plus FGN (100 mg/kg) were added to hemostatic therapy (IDA or PCC) after the first injury, and received the opposite hemostatic therapy (IDA 60 mg/kg or PCC 50 U/kg) after the second liver injury. BL, hemodynamic and coagulation parameters were monitored over 5 h or until death. Results: IDA as first line treatment resulted in a significant reduction in BL (IDA: 1040±202 mL) as compared to PCC (1389 ±194 mL) 60 min post injury. Despite increasing blood loss following the second trauma, the difference between groups remained significant (IDA-PCC: 1556 ± 205 mL, PCC-IDA: 1981±361 mL, P<0.0001). Likewise, in the initial TX+FGN+PCC (1696 ± 186 mL) and TX+FGN+IDA group (1416 ± 139 mL) blood loss was significantly lower compared to PCC mono-therapy (P=0.023 and P<0.0001). However, no significant difference between IDA monotherapy or TX+FGN+IDA was observed. Survival in all groups was 100%. Animals that received first IDA showed a complete reversal of coagulation parameters (e.g. aPTT, PT, thromboelastometry variables); PCC showed an improvement of clot initiation (CT) and PT, but parameters were not normalized to baseline values. The addition of FGN increased plasma concentration of fibrinogen and improved clot strength. Pathological analyses and clinical parameters including pulmonary pressure exhibited no adverse events in any of the investigated groups. Conclusion: Under conditions of ongoing blood loss after polytrauma and dabigatran anticoagulation, both IDA and PCC prevented exsanguination, although therapy with IDA was more effective. This can be explained by differences in mechanisms, IDA binds dabigatran and inhibits its anticoagulant effect, whereas PCC has no impact on dabigatran anticoagulation but nonspecifically enhances thrombin generation. Their different effects on coagulation parameters also reflect this. Moreover our data imply that clinically used multimodal hemostatic therapy with TX plus FGN and PCC or IDA appears safe under these conditions. Disclosures Grottke: NovoNordisk: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Research Funding. Rossaint:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Combination with Fibrinogen Plus Tranexamic Acid Is More Effective Than Mono-Therapy with Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in a Dabigatran Anticoagulation Experimental Polytrauma Model

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 346-346
Author(s):  
Oliver Grottke ◽  
Markus Honickel ◽  
Henri M.H. Spronk ◽  
Hugo ten Cate ◽  
Joanne van Ryn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prothrombin Complex Concentrate ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitor ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Coagulation Parameters ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Observation Period

Abstract Background: Urgent surgery or life-threatening bleeding requires prompt reversal of the anticoagulant effects of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. As no specific reversal agent in situations of life-threatening bleeding with dabigatran is currently available, this study assessed the ability of a four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) as mono-therapy as well as PCC in combination with tranexamic acid (TX) and fibrinogen in an experimental polytrauma pig model. Methods: After ethical approval dabigatran etexilate (30 mg/kg p.o. twice daily, n=24) was administered to male pigs for 3 days. On day 4, the pigs were anesthetized and given a 90 min infusion of active dabigatran to achieve consistent, supratherapeutic plasma levels. A standardized polytrauma including bilateral femur fractures and a blunt liver injury was induced. Animals underwent hemorrhagic shock and were resuscitated using Ringer’s solution (1 L). Twelve min after polytrauma, animals received either placebo (control group, n=6); TX, 20 mg/kg plus fibrinogen (80 mg/kg; TX+F group, n=6); PCC alone (PCC group, 50 U/kg, n=6); or TX (20 mg/kg) plus fibrinogen (80 mg/kg) plus PCC (50 U/kg; TX+F+PCC group, n=6) according to randomized group allocation. Coagulation was assessed by thromboelastometry, coagulation parameters and diluted TT. Blood loss (BL) was measured over the observation period of 240 min. Data were analyzed by ANOVA (± SD). Results: Dabigatran levels were 504 ± 171 ng/mL prior to injury and plasma levels remained significantly elevated in all animals throughout the observation period. The degree of injury was similar among animals with comparable BL of 803 ± 46 mL 12 min post injury. Anticoagulation with dabigatran without intervention resulted in a total BL of 3521 ± 600 mL, with 100% mortality and mean survival time of 101 ± 34 min (range: 67 - 148 min; p<0.05 vs PCC-treated groups). In contrast, treatment with 50 U/kg PCC (1712 ± 147 mL) resulted in a significant reduction in BL (p<0.05 vs. controls, TX+F group) and 100% survival. Blood loss was further reduced by adding TX and F with PCC (TX+F+PCC group: 1234 ± 215 mL, p<0.05 vs. all groups). In contrast total BL in animals treated with only TX plus F was 3601 ± 410 mL and comparable to control animals receiving only dabigatran, mortality was 100%, although the onset of bleeding was slightly reduced. Likewise, coagulation parameters improved substantially in animals from PCC and TX+F+PCC groups. Despite a significant increase of fibrinogen after substitution (196 ± 22 mg/dL) in the TX+F group, only moderate effects were measured on coagulation parameters including clot strength and kinetics of clot formation. Clinically and macroscopically no adverse events were observed. Conclusions: This study shows that bleeding in a lethal trauma model can be reduced with mono-therapy using a four-factor PCC. Prior correction of hypofibrinogenanemia with fibrinogen concentrate and tranexamic acid further improves PCC efficacy. Although the effects of PCCs on dabigatran reversal are not well understood, one possible explanation is that by elevating thrombin concentrations through PCC administration, (i.e. PCCs contain prothrombin) this may competitively bind to dabigatran, thereby reducing its anti-thrombin anticoagulant activity. This hypothesis is supported by the lack of effect on blood loss by mono-therapy with TX plus fibrinogen in this study. Disclosures Grottke: Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding. Honickel:Boehringer Ingelheim: Travel support Other. Spronk:Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. van Ryn:Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma: Employment. Rossaint:CSL Behring: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Real World Treatment Patterns and Toxicity Among Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5571-5571
Author(s):  
Jesus D Gonzalez-Lugo ◽  
Ana Acuna-Villaorduna ◽  
Joshua Heisler ◽  
Niyati Goradia ◽  
Daniel Cole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Treatment Change ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a disease of the elderly; with approximately two-thirds of cases diagnosed at ages older than 65 years. However, this population has been underrepresented in clinical trials. Hence, there are no evidence-based guidelines to select the most appropriate treatment that would balance effectiveness against risk for side effects in the real world. Currently, guidelines advise that doublet regimens should be considered for frail, elderly patients; but more detailed recommendations are lacking. This study aims to describe treatment patterns in older patients with MM and compare treatment response and side effects between doublet and triplet regimens. Methods: Patients diagnosed with MM at 70 years or older and treated at Montefiore Medical Center between 2000 and 2017 were identified using Clinical Looking Glass, an institutional software tool. Recipients of autologous stem cell transplant were excluded. We collected demographic data and calculated comorbidity burden based on the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Laboratory parameters included cell blood counts, renal function, serum-protein electrophoresis and free kappa/lambda ratio pre and post first-line treatment. Treatment was categorized into doublet [bortezomib/dexamethasone (VD) and lenalidomide/dexamethasone (RD)] or triplet regimens [lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (RVD) and cyclophosphamide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (CyborD)]. Disease response was reported as VGPR, PR, SD or PD using pre-established criteria. Side effects included cytopenias, diarrhea, thrombosis and peripheral neuropathy. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained by manual chart review. Event-free survival was defined as time to treatment change, death or disease progression. Data were analyzed by treatment group using Stata 14.1 Results: A total of 97 patients were included, of whom 46 (47.4%) were males, 47 (48.5%) were Non-Hispanic Black and 23 (23.7%) were Hispanic. Median age at diagnosis was 77 years (range: 70-90). Median baseline hemoglobin was 9.4 (8.5-10.5) and 14 (16.1%) had grade 3/4 anemia. Baseline thrombocytopenia and neutropenia of any grade were less common (18.4% and 17.7%, respectively) and 11 patients (20%) had GFR ≤30. Treatment regimens included VD (51, 52.6%), CyborD (18, 18.6%), RD (15, 15.5%) and RVD (13, 13.4%). Overall, doublets were more commonly used than triplets (66, 68% vs 31, 32%). Baseline characteristics were similar among treatment regimen groups. There was no difference in treatment selection among patients with baseline anemia or baseline neutropenia; however, doublets were preferred for those with underlying thrombocytopenia compared to triplets (93.8% vs 6.2%, p<0.01). Median first-line treatment duration was 4.1 months and did not differ among treatment groups (3.9 vs. 4.3 months; p=0.88 for doublets and triplets, respectively). At least a partial response was achieved in 47 cases (63.5%) and it did not differ between doublets and triplets (61.7% vs 66.7%). In general, first line treatment was changed in 50 (51.5%) patients and the change frequency was higher for triplets than doublets (71% vs 42.4%, p<0.01). Among patients that changed treatment, 17(34.7%) switched from a doublet to a triplet; 15 (30.6%) from a triplet to a doublet and 17 (34.7%) changed the regimen remaining as doublet or triplet, respectively. There was no difference in frequency of cytopenias, diarrhea, thrombosis or peripheral neuropathy among groups. Median event-free survival was longer in patients receiving doublet vs. triplet therapy, although the difference was not statistically significant (7.3 vs 4.3 months; p=0.06). Conclusions: We show a real-world experience of an inner city, elderly MM cohort, ineligible for autologous transplantation. A doublet combination and specifically the VD regimen was the treatment of choice in the majority of cases. In this cohort, triplet regimens did not show better response rates and led to treatment change more often than doublets. Among patients requiring treatment, approximately a third switched from doublet to triplet or viceversa which suggest that current evaluation of patient frailty at diagnosis is suboptimal. Despite similar frequency of side effects among groups, there was a trend towards longer event-free survival in patients receiving doublets. Larger retrospective studies are needed to confirm these results. Disclosures Verma: Janssen: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Stelexis: Equity Ownership, Honoraria; Acceleron: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Clinical and Biological Characteristics and Outcomes of Richter Transformation : A French Multicenter Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4112-4112
Author(s):  
Charline Moulin ◽  
Romain Morizot ◽  
Thomas Remen ◽  
Hélène Augé ◽  
Florian Bouclet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Long Term Survivors ◽  
First Line Treatment

Introduction: About 2 to 10% of patients (pts) diagnosed with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, so-called Richter transformation (RT)) over long-term follow-up. The outcomes of pts with RT are variable and poorly understood and there is no consensus on the best therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, outcomes and factors predictive of survival in a large series of RT from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO). Methods: Biopsy-confirmed RT (limited to DLBCL and excluding Hodgkin lymphoma) diagnosed from 2001 to 2018 were identified from eight FILO centers. Clinical and biological characteristics of CLL and RT at diagnosis, including cytogenetics, clonal relation with the pre-existing CLL, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, cell of origin (COO) analyzed by immunohistochemistry and RT score (Tsimberidou AM et al, J Clin Oncol, 2006) were analyzed as well as treatment and outcomes. Overall survivals (OS) were defined as time from CLL and RT diagnosis to death from any cause and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4. Results: A total of 70 CLL pts who developed RT were identified. The median age at CLL diagnosis was 62 years old (range 35-82), and 50 (71.4 %) were male. The median time to transformation was 5.5 years (range 0 to 22 years), with 12 simultaneous diagnosis of CLL and RT. Prior to RT, 20 (29%) pts had not been treated for CLL, 50 received one (n=21) or more (n= 29) line of treatment ; 6 pts had received a novel agent (ibrutinib, idelalisib or venetoclax). The median age at RT diagnosis was 68 years old (range 42-88). All biopsies were centrally reviewed; 38/58 pts (66%) had elevated LDH (>1.5N) ; 35/65 pts (54 %) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm); 10/54 (18.5%) pts had del(17p) or TP53 mutation ; 9/42 pts (21%) had a complex karyotype (at least 3 abnormalities). The CLL and RT were clonally related in 27/27 (100%) tested pts. COO by Hans algorithm was non germinal center B cell-like (GCB) in 26/28 pts (93%). EBV was positive or detected in 5/40 (12.5%) pts. The median of Ki67 positivity was 70% (range 30% to 100%). The RT score (based at RT diagnosis on ECOG performance status 2-4, LDH >1.5 x normal, platelets<100 x 109/L, tumor size >5 cm and >1 prior therapy for CLL) was : low risk in 17 pts (31%), low-intermediate risk in 10 pts (19%), high-intermediate risk in 14 pts (25%) and high risk in 14 pts (25%). The most common first-line treatment of RT was immunochemotherapy (n=57, 87%) including R-CHOP-like regimen (n=48, 73%). Autologous or allogeneic transplantation was performed for 7 pts (11%). Response to first-line treatment was complete or partial response in 26 pts (40%), and stable disease or progression in 39 pts (60%). After a median follow-up of 8 years, 51/64 pts (80%) have died. The main causes of death were progressive DLBCL (n=36, 71%), infection (n=8, 16%) or progressive CLL (n=2, 4%). The median OS of the cohort from CLL and RT diagnosis (Figure 1) were 7.8 years and 9.5 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with TP53 disruption at CLL stage, low platelets count, elevated LDH, elevated beta2-microglobulin, high ECOG score, high RT score, EBV positivity and absence of response to first-line RT treatment had worse OS. The ECOG score, platelets count and TP53 disruption remain significant in multivariate Cox-regression. Last, we compared the clinical and biological parameters of two Richter groups defined as: (i) short-term survivors (<12 months, n = 34) and (ii) long-term survivors (>48 months, n = 18). Long survival was significantly associated with elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to RT first-line treatment. Discussion: The clinical outcomes of RT patients is poor and novel treatment options are needed. However, a group of long-term survivors was identified, characterized by elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to immunochemotherapy. Disclosures Leblond: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Thieblemont:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cymbalista:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Guièze:Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Broseus:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Feugier:gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Major Improvement of Invasive Aspergillosis Outcome Is Not Enough to Improve Overall Survival In Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Results From a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1244-1244
Author(s):  
Géraldine Salmeron ◽  
Raphaël Porcher ◽  
Anne Bergeron ◽  
Marie Robin ◽  
Regis Peffault de Latour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 1244 Background. Voriconazole (V) treatment has been shown to improve the 12 week (W) survival rate of hematological patients (pts) with invasive aspergillosis (IA), including recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). We investigated whether this early survival advantage could translate into a significant increase in overall survival. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive pts who received a transplant between Sept. 1997 and Dec. 2008 at Saint-Louis Hospital and were diagnosed as having IA. The temporal origin of the study was the date of IA diagnosis for each patient. Factors associated with survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. Separate models were estimated for survival up to 12 W and for survival between 12 W and 24 months (M) in pts surviving longer than 12 W. The deaths of pts with and without IA were analyzed with a competing risk framework. Cumulative incidence curves were compared using Gray's tests. Results. Our study examined 89 IA pts. The median follow-up was 70 M (range, 11–130 M). Two pts did not receive any antifungal treatment and were excluded from subsequent analyses. Of the 87 pts, 42 received first-line V and 45 primarily received a lipid formulation of amphotericin B (n=25), amphotericin B deoxycholate (n=10), caspofungin (n=8) or itraconazole (n=2). The primary characteristics of pts with IA and their causes of death, separated by V as first-line treatment, are shown in the table below. The median survival was 2.6 M, and the overall survival at 24 M was 19% (95% CI 12–30 M) (see figure). Overall, the survival rates of the two groups were significantly different (P= 0.010). However, the differences in survival were quite dramatic prior to 10 M, whereas both survival curves became very close after one year. At 18 M, the numbers of surviving pts were almost identical in the two groups [19% (95% CI: 11–34%) in pts who did not receive V as first-line treatment vs. 21% (95% CI 11–38%) in pts who did]. Pts who did not receive V as a first-line treatment displayed a higher probability of dying from IA than those who did (P=0.004), whereas opposite results were found for mortality in pts without IA (P=0.006). The 24-M cumulative incidence of death from IA was 47% (95% CI 31–61%) in the no V group and 19% (95% CI 9–33%) in the group treated with V. The 24-M cumulative incidence of death in pts without IA was 4% (95% CI 7–14%) in the no V group and 27% (95% CI 14–42%) in pts treated with V. The probability of death from another cause, with IA, was similar in both groups (29% vs. 36% at 24 M; P=0.46). After adjusting for donor type, conditioning regimen, progressive GVHD at diagnosis of IA and cumulated steroid dose (mg/kg) in the W preceding IA diagnosis, administration of V as first-line treatment was found to decrease the risk of death during the first 12 W by approximately 70% [HR=0.31 (95% CI 0.16–0.60); P=0.0005]. Conversely, analysis of mortality between 12 W and 24 M failed to identify any significant predictor of risk of death; however, only 24 pts died during this period. Conclusions. The finding that first-line treatment with V, which is associated with a tremendous improvement in IA outcome, does not translate into an increase in overall survival (even in the context of early diagnosis) is striking. Diagnosis of IA following HSCT, whatever the outcome, appears to be a strong marker for poor long-term prognosis. Disclosures: Bergeron: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau, none; Merck: Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Speakers Bureau, none. Sulahian:Pfizer: Research Funding, non; Merck: Research Funding, none. Ribaud:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, none; Gilead: Speakers Bureau, none.

Clinicopathological Features of Nodular Sclerosis-Type Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma In the Elderly: Multicenter Study of Hodgkin Lymphoma In Japan

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2677-2677
Author(s):  
Naoko Asano ◽  
Tomohiro Kinoshita ◽  
Koichi Ohshima ◽  
Tadashi Yoshino ◽  
Nozomi Niitsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Clinicopathological Features ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 2677 Background: Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL), which is characterized by the presence of Hodgkin and Reed Sternberg (H-RS) cells in a background of non-neoplastic inflammatory cells, is divided into four histological subgroups, nodular sclerosis (NSCHL), mixed cellularity (MCCHL), lymphocyte-rich, and lymphocyte depletion. While NSCHL in young adults is characterized by a mediastinal mass and good prognosis, the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCHL in the elderly (NSCHL-e) remain uncertain. Patients and methods: Enrolled patients were diagnosed with CHL between 1986 and 2006 as part of the Hodgkin Lymphoma's Multicenter Study Group. To better characterize NSCHL-e, we compared the clinicopathological profiles of 84 NSCHL-e patients aged 50 or over with 237 NSCHL-y patients aged 49 or younger and 302 with MCCHL. Results: The total of 743 CHL patients consisted of 496 men and 247 women with a median age of 48 years (range, 15– 89 years). The pathological diagnoses were NSCHL in 324 patients (43%) and MCCHL in 303 (41%). NSCHL patients showed a bimodal age distribution, with an initial peak in their 20s and a second small peak in their 60s. We categorized the former as NSCHL-y (49 or younger) and the latter as NSCHL-e (50 and over). NSCHL-e patients were characterized by male predominance and a more advanced clinical stage (53%) than NSCHL-y. Immunophenotypically, H-RS cells had the prototypic immunophenotype of CD15+ CD30+ and Pax5+. NSCHL-e cases showed a significantly higher rate of CD20 (24%) than NSCHL-y (8%, P = 0.001). Furthermore, H-RS cells in 29 of 75 (39%) patients with NSCHL-e were positive for EBV RNA transcripts by in situ hybridization, whereas only 7% of NSCHL-y cases were EBER-positive (P < 0.0001) (Table). Regarding NSCHL-e and MCCHL, no significant difference between these patients was seen in clinical characteristics. Immunophenotypically, NSCHL-e patients showed significantly higher rates for CD3 and TIA-1, while MCCHL patients showed higher EBV positivity (75%). Fifty-five of 63 patients received systemic multi-agent chemotherapy as first-line treatment, consisting of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbacin (ABVD) in 38 patients; CHOP in 8; C-MOPP in 8; and BEACOPP in 1. Overall, 51 patients responded to first-line treatment, 39 with complete response and 12 with partial response. Disease-specific survival of NSCHL-e was poorer than that of NSCHL-y (P < 0.001) but similar to that of MCCHL (P = 0.43) (Figure). Conclusion: NSCHL-e is characterized by an unfavorable prognosis and different clinicopathological features to NSCHL-y, which is considered as typical NSCHL. A number of cases of NSCHL-e might have been associated with MCCHL, with most being EBV-positive. These results suggest the limitations of current histological subgroupings for CHL. Disclosures: Matsushita: Pfizer CO.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter Co.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Menorrhagia in Women with Severe Bleeding Disorders

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4626-4626
Author(s):  
Susan Halimeh ◽  
Joanna Davies ◽  
Debra Pollard ◽  
Rezan Abdul-Kadir
Keyword(s):  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Severe Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Disorders ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment ◽  
Factor Concentration

Abstract Abstract 4626 The management of menorrhagia presents a challenge in women with severe bleeding disorders. Conservative medical management is the first line treatment and most women with severe bleeding disorder require combination treatment. Surgical intervention may ultimately be offered to women in whom medical management has failed and whom no longer desire fertility. Women with low factor levels are at risk of perioperative bleeding complications and may require haemostatic support. A total of 50 women with severe factor deficiencies (less than 20iu/dL) were included in this study. 46 women were registered at the Haemophilia Centre at the Royal Free Hospital in London. Four cases were also included from the Rhine-Ruhr Haemophilia Centre in Duisburg, Germany. We reviewed the occurrence of menorrhagia and the management options that were offered. In those that required surgical intervention, the incidence of postoperative bleeding complications and the requirement for factor concentration was also reviewed. The bleeding disorders in these women were 34 (68%) with severe factor XI deficiency, 10 (20%) with severe type 1 and type 3 von Willebrand's disease, 4 (8%) with factor VII deficiency, 2 (4%) had factor V or X deficiencies and one (2%) had a combination of factor VI and VIII deficiency. The ISTH/SSC joint working group bleeding assessment tool was used to assess the severity and frequency of bleeding symptoms among this cohort of women. The bleeding scores ranged from −2 to 30 with a median score of 9.5. In total, 32 out of 50 (64%) women with severe factor deficiency required medical attention for menorrhagia. Medical treatment included hormonal preparations (combined oral contraceptive pill or levonorgestrel intrauterine device), which was used as a first line treatment in 15 out of 32 (46.8%) women. Haemostatic treatment included antifibrinolytic medication such as tranexamic acid, which was used in combination with hormonal therapy. One women required intranasal DDAVP, von Willebrand factor concentrate and tranexamic acid. Failure to control menstrual bleeding occurred in 14 (43.7%) women and surgical intervention was required. 7 out of 14 (50%) women required hysterectomy and the remaining 7 women underwent endometrial ablation. Prophylaxis with factor concentration to cover surgical intervention was given in 8 out of 14 women (64.2%). The remainder received tranexamic acid for 24–48 hours following surgery. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 7 women that had surgical intervention, despite two women receiving prophylaxis. This study highlights the complexity involved in the management of menorrhagia in women with severe bleeding disorders and the high risk of postoperative bleeding. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Dasatinib (Sprycel®) and Low Intensity Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment in Patients with De Novo Philadelphia Positive ALL Aged 55 and Over: Final Results of the EWALL-Ph-01 Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 666-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
Marie Magdeleine Coudé ◽  
Françoise Huguet ◽  
Marina Lafage ◽  
Thibaut Leguay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Src Family Kinases ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
European Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 666 Background. Dasatinib (Sprycel®, Bristol-Myers Squibb) is a potent multi-targeted kinase inhibitor (TKI) of BCR-ABL and SRC family kinases. The EWALL group for adult ALL decided to run a study at the European level evaluating the combination of dasatinib and chemotherapy for Philadelphia positive (Ph+) ALL patients (pts) aged 55 and over. Aim. To analyse efficacy of Dasatinib combined to low intensity chemotherapy and to test factors associated with outcome. (EudraCT 2006–005694-21). Methods. After prephase, dasatinib was administered at 140 mg QD (100 mg over 70y) during the induction period in combination with weekly vincristine (VCR) 1 mg IV and dexamethasone (DEX) 40 mg for 2 days (20 mg over 70y) for 4 weeks. Consolidation Disclosures: Rousselot: BMS, Novartis: Research Funding. Gambacorti-Passerini:BMS, Novartis: Research Funding.

Chemoimmunotherapy With Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) Versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) In Previously Untreated and Physically Fit Patients (pts) With Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results Of a Planned Interim Analysis Of The CLL10 Trial, An International, Randomized Study Of The German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 526-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Eichhorst ◽  
Anna-Maria Fink ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Elisabeth Lange ◽  
Hubert Köppler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction FCR is the current standard first line treatment regimen in advanced CLL (Hallek et al., Lancet, 2010), but is associated with significant side effects. The GCCLSG initiated an international phase III study in order to test the non-inferiority regarding efficacy and potentially better tolerability of BR compared to FCR in first-line therapy of physically fit pts without del(17p). Methods and Patients 688 CLL pts from 158 sites in five countries (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Denmark and Czech Republic) were screened centrally for immunophenotype, genomic aberrations by FISH, IGHV sequenzing, comorbidity burden and renal function. 564 CLL pts with CIRS score ≤ 6, creatinine clearance > 70 ml/min and without del(17p) were enrolled between October 2008 and June 2011. Pts were randomly assigned to receive 6 courses of either FCR (N= 284; F 25mg/m2 i.v. d1–3, C 250 mg/m2 i.v. d1–3, R 375 mg/m2 i.v. d 0 at first cycle and 500 mg/m2 d1 all subsequent courses; q 28 days) or BR (N=280; B 90mg/m2 i.v. d1+2, R 375 mg/m2 i.v. d 0 at first cycle and 500 mg/m2 d1 all subsequent courses; q 28 days). The intent-to-treat population consisted of 561 pts, because three patients were excluded due to deferred treatment (1 pt decision, 1 treatment before randomization, 1 misdiagnosis). 22 % were Binet A, 38 % Binet B and 40 % Binet C. The median age was 62 years (yrs) (range 33 to 82), median CIRS score 2 (range 0-6). There were significantly more pts with unmutated IGVH in the BR arm (68%) in comparison to the FCR arm (55%; p=0.003). All other characteristics including median age were well balanced. A mean number of 5.27 courses was given in the FCR arm versus 5.41 courses in the BR arm (p=0.022). 70.6% (FCR) and 80.3% (BR) of pts received 6 courses (p=0.008). Dose was reduced by more than 10% in 27.3% (FCR) and 31.6% (BR) of all courses given (p = 0.012). Results The median observation time was 27.9 months (mo) in all pts alive. While response evaluation was missing in 14 pts, 547 pts (274 FCR; BR 273) were evaluable for response and all 561 pts (282 FCR; 279 BR) for progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS) and OS. The overall response rate was identical in both arms with 97.8% (p=1.0). The complete response rate (CRR) (confirmed by central immunhistology) with FCR was 47.4% as compared to 38.1% with BR (p=0.031). MRD data were available at interim analysis from 192 pts (99 FCR; 93 BR) of the first 300pts. 71.7% of pts in the FCR and 66.7% in the BR arms achieved MRD-levels below 10-4 in peripheral blood at final staging (p=0.448). The complete MRD data set will be available by November. PFS was 85.0% at 2 yrs in the FCR arm and 78.2% in the BR arm (p=0.041). EFS was 82.6% at 2 yrs in the FCR arm and 75.7% in the BR arm (p=0.037).There was no difference in OS rate for the FCR vs BR arm (94.2% vs 95.8% at 2 years p=0.593). Hazard Ratio for PFS, EFS and OS was 1.385, 1.375 and 0.842 respectively. PFS was assessed in pts < 65 yrs and ≥ 65 yrs. While there was a significant difference in pts < 65 yrs between both treatment arm (median PFS for BR 36.5 mo vs not reached for FCR; p=0.016), the difference disappeared in elderly pts (not reached vs. 45.6 mo; p=0.757). A multivariate analysis including treatment arm, Binet stage, age, sex, comorbidity, serum TK, serum beta2-microglobulin (Beta2M), del(11q) and IGHV status identified treatment arm, Beta2M, del(11q) and IGHV as independent prognostic factors for PFS and EFS. FCR treated pts had significantly more frequent severe, CTC grade 3 to 5, adverse events during the whole observation period (90.8% vs 78.5%; p<0.001). Especially severe hematotoxicity was more frequent in the FCR arm (90.0% vs 66.9%, p<0.001). The higher rate of severe neutropenia (81.7% vs 56.8%, p<0.001) resulted in a significantly higher rate of severe infections (39.0% vs 25.4%, p=0.001) in the FCR arm, especially in the elderly (FCR: 47.4% vs BR: 26.5%; p=0.002). Treatment related mortality occurred in 3.9% (n=11) in the FCR and 2.1% (n=6) in the BR arm. Conclusion The results of this planned interim analysis show that FCR seems more efficient than BR in the first-line treatment of fit CLL pts with regard to higher CRR, as well as longer PFS and EFS. These advantages might be balanced by a higher rate of severe adverse events, in particular neutropenia and infections, associated with FCR. In light of these results, no firm recommendation of one regimen over the other can be given at the present time regarding the first-line use in CLL pts with good physical fitness. Disclosures: Eichhorst: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gregor:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Travel Support Other; Mundipharma: Travel Support, Travel Support Other. Plesner:Mundipharma: Research Funding. Trneny:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Fischer:Roche: Travel grants Other; Mundipharma: Travel grants, Travel grants Other. Kneba:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wendtner:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kreuzer:Roche: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria. Stilgenbauer:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel grants Other; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Böttcher:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hallek:Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding.

Predictors of Early Relapse Following Initial Therapy for Systemic Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2082-2082
Author(s):  
Nidhi Tandon ◽  
Surbhi Sidana ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Early Relapse ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL Amyloidosis) is a monoclonal plasma cell proliferative disorder that is characterized by tissue deposits of misfolded insoluble κ or λ light chain derived amyloid fibrils, leading to organ dysfunction. The prognosis of patients depends on the number and severity of organ involvement, especially cardiac involvement. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), if eligible, alkylator (melphalan) and novel drugs like proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulators (IMiD) have improved the overall survival (OS) during the past decades. But still, nearly half of the patients die within a year of diagnosis. We analyzed the factors predicting early relapse / progression or death (within 12 months) after first line therapy for systemic AL amyloidosis. Methods Clinical and laboratory data of all consecutive patients with systemic AL amyloidosis seen at Mayo Clinic within 90 days of their diagnosis, between 2006 and 2015, was collected by chart review and analyzed retrospectively. Patients who died within 3 months of starting the first line treatment were excluded from analysis. Early relapse (ER) was defined as relapse / progression requiring treatment change / re-institution or death within 12 months of starting first line treatment. Patients in the cohort with ER were compared with patients with a follow up of more than 12 months who had a relapse / progression beyond 12 months or had continuing response at the time of analysis. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi - square and Fisher's exact test and continuous variables using Kruskal- Wallis test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariate analysis was done using logistic regression model. Results Seven hundred and eighty six patients with newly diagnosed systemic AL amyloidosis met the study criteria and were included in the analysis. Among these, 230 (29.3%) patients had ER within 12 months of starting initial therapy while 556 (70.7%) patients either relapsed after 1 year or had continuing response at the time of analysis. Baseline demographics, organ involvement and type of first line therapy are presented in Table1. The median estimated follow up for the entire cohort from start of initial therapy was 62.9 months (95% CI; 59.9, 67.3). The variables included in the univariate and multivariate analyses for factors predicting ER were age at diagnosis (≤ vs > 70 years ), revised mayo stage (I and II vs III and IV), bone marrow plasma cell percentage (BMPC; ≤ 10% vs > 10%), presence of any chromosomal abnormalities, trisomies or IgH translocations by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multiorgan involvement [(>1 vs 1) (heart, liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, autonomic neuropathy), incorporation of ASCT in initial therapy. In univariate analysis, mayo stage (p<0.0001), multiorgan involvement (p=0.0008) and inclusion of ASCT as part of initial therapy (p<0.0001) were significantly associated with ER, while age (p=0.06), BMPC(p=0.9), FISH abnormalities (p=0.2) were not. However, in multivariate analysis, only mayo stage (III + IV vs I + II; p=0.01) and non-inclusion of ASCT in first line treatment (p=0.0001) were significantly predictive of ER. Conclusions Despite the introduction of ASCT and novel drugs, the early mortality in systemic AL amyloidosis remains high. This study demonstrates that patients with ER are older with higher prevalence of cardiac involvement and multiorgan involvement and higher Mayo stage (III and IV). Incorporation of ASCT as part of the initial therapy was associated with reduced early relapse, but it is difficult to separate the influence of the eligibility for ASCT from the effect of ASCT itself. This will help us in characterizing these patients to better understand their mechanisms of resistance to therapy and gives an insight to the type of initial therapy that benefits them. Disclosures Dispenzieri: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; pfizer: Research Funding. Kapoor:Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kesios: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document