Phase 1 Study of a Hepcidin Antagonist, LY2787106, in Cancer-Associated Anemia

Abstract BACKGROUND: Hepcidin is a 25-amino-acid peptide that binds to ferroportin and causes internalization and degradation of the hepcidin-ferroportin complex, leading to decreased iron absorption and reduced iron export from reticuloendothelial cells. High hepcidin levels are found in cancer patients (pts) and implicated in anemia pathogenesis. It is hypothesized that neutralizing hepcidin with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) will prevent internalization of ferroportin, restore iron efflux from cells, and allow transferrin-mediated iron transport to the bone marrow to support erythropoiesis. LY2787106 is a fully humanized mAb with high affinity for human hepcidin. This phase 1 study evaluated the safety, PK/PD, and efficacy (effects on serum iron panel [iron, ferritin, transferrin saturation (TSAT), soluble transferrin receptor, reticulocyte hemoglobin], reticulocytosis, and hemoglobin [Hb]) of LY2787106 in cancer pts with anemia. METHODS: A 3+3 design was used in the dose-escalation phase to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of LY2787106. Eligible pts were ≥18 years old with previously treated metastatic/incurable nonmyeloid cancer, Hb <11 g/dL, serum hepcidin ≥5 ng/mL, and ECOG performance status ≤2. The primary objective of Part A was to assess the safety of LY2787106 over a range of doses (0.3-10 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks [Q3W]); the primary objective of Part B was to assess mean change in Hb from baseline to end of Cycle 4 following LY2787106 treatment (10 mg/kg IV weekly) with (Cohort B1) or without (Cohort B2) oral iron supplementation. RESULTS: A total of 33 pts were enrolled (Part A, n=19; Part B, B1, n =7; B2, n=7). Overall, most pts had multiple myeloma (n=14 [42.4%]). Mean age was 65 years (range, 44-88 years). There were 20 females and 13 males. Patients had received a median of 4.5 prior oncology treatments. Mean (SD) Hb level at baseline was 9.2 (0.95) g/dL. The median number of cycles given and completed was 3. No DLTs were seen in Part A, so the MTD was not reached. Data from Part A showed that LY2787106 was well tolerated when given Q3W, had a short half-life (~7 days), and transiently increased serum iron. This supported more frequent weekly dosing in Part B. Treatment-emergent AEs related to LY2787106 occurred in 4 pts (12.1%): increased creatine phosphokinase (grade 2), cardiac failure (grade 3), QT prolongation (grade 1), and neutropenia (grade 2) (1 pt each). Eight pts generated antibodies to LY2787106, but none had hypersensitivity reactions. The LY2787106 PK profile was consistent with reported PK characteristics of a mAb; the profile included a small clearance of ~0.032 L/h associated with limited volume of distribution, resulting in a terminal half-life of ~7 days. LY2787106 PK was independent of time and dose and exposure linear in the 0.3-10 mg/kg dose range. PD data indicated that LY2787106 administration led to a mean maximum 3.48-fold increase (90% CI, 2.5-4.8) from baseline in serum iron at the highest dose (10 mg/kg) in Parts A and B. Serum iron increase was maximal ~24-48 hours post dose, but returned to baseline within a week after dosing. The increase in serum iron paralleled a transient increase in TSAT at dose levels of 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg. This translated to a transient increase in mean ratio of reticulocyte count relative to baseline at 2 weeks post dose in pts who received 10 mg/kg Q3W, but Hb levels remained relatively unchanged. In Part B, a ≥0.5 g/dL increase in Hb from baseline, albeit transient, was seen in 4 pts at Week 12 (2 pts each cohort). No consistent increase in reticulocytes or changes in iron profiles were seen in these pts. Factors that may have confounded the limited change in Hb and reticulocyte profiles included the myelosuppressive effects of chemotherapy concomitantly given during the study, comorbidities, and study-related blood draws. As expected, LY2787106 administration led to increased hepcidin concentrations secondary to hepcidin binding/neutralization by LY2787106 and hepcidin release in response to iron increase. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first clinical trial of a fully humanized mAb against hepcidin. LY2787106 was well tolerated in cancer pts with anemia. Targeting the hepcidin-ferroportin pathway by neutralizing hepcidin resulted in transient iron mobilization and reticulocyte count relative to baseline, thus supporting the role of hepcidin in iron regulation and anemia pathogenesis. Disclosures Vadhan-Raj: Eli Lilly & company: Research Funding. Goldman:Eli LIlly and Company: Research Funding. Slapak:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Tiu:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Wang:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Callies:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Cox:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Tuttle:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Lau:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Roeland:Cellceutix: Other: DSMB; Eisai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Helsinn: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Inform Genomics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TEVA: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Analysis of the Potential Effect of Ponatinib on the QTc Interval in Patients with Refractory Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.4441.4441 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 4441-4441

Author(s):

Daryl Sonnichsen ◽

David Dorer ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Moshe Talpaz ◽

Michael W. Deininger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Cardiac Repolarization ◽

Concentration Data ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Dose ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 4441 Background: Ponatinib, an oral multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is a potent pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor. Preliminary anti-leukemia activity of ponatinib was observed in patients with refractory chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and advanced hematologic malignancies in a phase 1 study. Due to the QT prolongation noted with other TKIs, the effect of ponatinib on ECGs was examined in this population. Methods: This ongoing phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, multicenter trial was designed to evaluate the safety of oral ponatinib administered to patients with advanced hematologic malignancies who failed available therapies. Patients received ponatinib orally once daily (2 mg to 60 mg) over at least 1 cycle (28 days) of study treatment unless an unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. Inclusion criteria required screening QTc < 450 ms and prohibited concomitant use of medications known to prolong QTc. For the last 3 cohorts (30 mg, 45 mg and 60 mg), 12-lead ECGs (supine) were recorded using GE MAC1200 ECG recorders at the following time-points: C1D1 pre-dose (triplicate); C1D15 pre-dose (single); C2D1 pre-dose (triplicate); C2D1 2-hour post-dose (triplicate); C2D1 4-hour post-dose (triplicate); C2D1 6-hour post-dose (triplicate). Matching plasma ponatinib concentration data were also obtained at these time-points. This analysis of the cardiac safety of ponatinib only included patients who had replicate ECGs at baseline and a minimum of 1 additional on-treatment time-point with matching plasma ponatinib concentration data. The primary assessment was Fridericia corrected QT (QTcF). Results: A total of 81 patients were enrolled in the phase 1 study; 39 patients who received 30 mg or more of ponatinib daily were included in this analysis. There was no significant effect on cardiac repolarization as measured by the lack of a significant change in QTcF at all doses. Mean QTcF change from baseline was −10.9, −3.6, and −5.9 ms for the 30 mg, 45 mg and 60 mg cohorts, respectively. In addition, the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models show the slope of the relationship for QTcF versus plasma ponatinib concentration was negative, indicating no exposure-effect relationship, with an estimated QTcF mean change of −6.4 (upper confidence interval −0.9) ms at Cmax for the 60 mg group. ECG data revealed no significant change in heart rate (+3.5, −3.3, and +1.0 bpm for 30 mg, 45 mg and 60 mg cohorts, respectively). There was no signal of any effect on atrioventricular conduction as measured by the PR interval duration (mean change: −0.4, −3.6, and −0.7 ms, respectively). There was a slight, dose responsive, non-clinically significant increase in QRS duration (mean change: −0.8, +1.3, and +3.6 ms, respectively) that may be due to variability secondary to the limited sample size. There were 2 subjects with new atrial fibrillation and new T wave inversion. These morphological changes likely reflect the patient population being studied rather than any potential drug effect. Adverse event (AE) reports from the trial had 3 patients with ECG QT prolonged (2 mg, 4 mg and 45 mg) documented as a treatment-related AE; 2 were grade 3 (4 mg and 45 mg). On review, all 3 patients were found to have baseline (C1D1) prolongation of QTc or were on concomitant medications associated with QTc prolongation. There were no clinical consequences of the ECG findings in these patients. Conclusion: This analysis of the QTc intervals of patients who received ponatinib 30 mg or higher in the phase 1 clinical trial revealed there was no significant effect of ponatinib on cardiac repolarization. Disclosures: Sonnichsen: ARIAD: Consultancy. Dorer:ARIAD: Employment. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Talpaz:ARIAD: Research Funding. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Shah:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Bixby:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau. Mauro:ARIAD: Research Funding. Flinn:ARIAD: Research Funding. Litwin:ARIAD: Consultancy. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Study of Tabalumab, a Human Anti-BAFF Antibody and Bortezomib in Patients with Previously-Treated Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.447.447 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 447-447 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Noopur Raje ◽

Edward Anthony Faber ◽

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Gary J. Schiller ◽

Raymond J. Hohl ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Median Number ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Baseline Serum ◽

Lower Baseline ◽

Previously Treated

Abstract Abstract 447 Background: Tabalumab, a human mAb that neutralizes membrane-bound and soluble B cell activating factor (BAFF), has demonstrated both anti-myeloma activity and osteoclastogenesis inhibition in xenograft models of multiple myeloma (MM). We initially conducted a Phase 1 study with the combination of tabalumab and bortezomib in previously-treated MM patients who were not refractory to bortezomib. The results from the dose escalation (Part A) have been previously reported, where a tabalumab dose of 100 mg was selected based on several factors, most notably the stabilization of the peak to trough concentration ratio. The cohort expansion (Part B) has since completed enrollment, and we now report the preliminary results for the entire study. Methods: The primary objective was to identify a safe and potentially efficacious dose of tabalumab to be combined with bortezomib. Bortezomib was given in a standard biweekly fashion, 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21 day cycle, and tabalumab at 1, 10, 30, 100, or 300 mg (Part A) or 100 mg (Part B) IV (30 min) on day 1 in Cycles 1 – 3, 5, and 7. The study was later amended to include dexamethasone to assess safety, and 12 patients received dexamethasone in combination with bortezomib and tabalumab. Response was assessed per IMWG criteria and adverse events per CTCAE v3.0. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) samples were obtained throughout the study, including BAFF, IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, VEGF, and TNF-alpha. Results: Forty-eight patients were enrolled to the study; 20 to dose escalation (Part A) and 28 to cohort expansion (Part B). The median age was 65.7 years and 56% were women. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1–10). All patients received either bortezomib or an IMiD; 75% received prior bortezomib and 88% received prior IMiD therapy. The median number of cycles was 5.5 (range 1–28). Grade 3/4 toxicities occurring in two or more patients included peripheral sensory neuropathy, pneumonia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, musculoskeletal pain, renal failure acute, fatigue, anemia, neuralgia, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Most patients discontinued treatment due to progressive disease or adverse events (neuropathy, neuralgia, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia). Two patients died during study participation - one during treatment from acute respiratory distress syndrome and another during follow-up from multiple myeloma. Confirmed responses included 2 complete responses, 4 very good partial responses, and 16 partial responses. Response associated with lower baseline serum BAFF or IL-6 levels, independent of the tabalumab dose. Also, response in patients treated with tabalumab 100 mg appeared to associate with lower baseline serum levels of IL-10 and undetectable TNF-alpha. With 14 patients censored, the TTP was 4.9 months (95% CI: 4 – 8). With 6 patients censored, the median response duration was 7.3 months (95% CI: 3.5 – 13.9). Conclusions: A 100 mg dose of tabalumab in combination with bortezomib was well tolerated; 22 patients achieved a PR or better despite prior bortezomib and/or IMiD therapy. Response correlated with lower baseline serum BAFF levels, supporting the hypothesis that a higher dose of tabalumab should be evaluated. A three-arm study randomizing patients to the combination(s) of bortezomib, dexamethasone, and tabalumab 100 mg vs. tabalumab 300mg vs. placebo is currently enrolling. Disclosures: Raje: Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Eli-Lilly: Research Funding. Richardson:Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schiller:Eli Lilly & Company: Research Funding. Cohen:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Carpenter:Eli Lilly & Company: Employment. Cronier:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Kaiser:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Wooldridge:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Anderson:Acetylon, Oncopep: Scientific Founder, Scientific Founder Other; Celgene, Millennium, BMS, Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Trial in Progress: A Phase I Trial of BTX-A51 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory AML or High-Risk MDS

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142557 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 18-19

Author(s):

Brian J. Ball ◽

Anthony S. Stein ◽

Gautam Borthakur ◽

Crystal Murray ◽

Karin Kook ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Expansion Phase

Background: For patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), low response rates and poor overall survival remain unmet clinical needs. AML cells evade apoptosis through overexpression of antiapoptotic genes and inactivation of p53. The antiapoptotic gene Mcl1 is overexpressed in AML cell lines resistant to venetoclax. Similarly, the sensitivity of AML patients' samples to venetoclax inversely correlates with the presence of a TP53 mutation or low expression of p53. In AML, p53 inactivation more commonly results from overexpression of its negative regulators, Mdmx and Mdm2. BTX-A51 is a novel, oral, direct inhibitor of Casein kinase 1α (CK1α), cyclin dependent kinase 7 (CDK7), and CDK9. CK1α phosphorylates Mdmx and Mdm2 leading to enhanced binding and degradation of p53. CDK7 and CDK9 phosphorylate RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to enable transcriptional initiation and elongation, particularly at large clusters of transcriptional enhancers termed super-enhancers (SE). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that BTX-A51 robustly increased p53 protein levels via CK1a inhibition and Mdm2 downregulation while preferentially decreasing SE transcription of key oncogenes such as Myc andMcl1, enabling selective apoptosis of leukemia cells. The combination of CK1α, CDK7, and CDK9 inhibition was synergistic and prolonged survival in multiple genetic and patient-derived xenograft AML models. Study Design and Methods: This is an open-label, multi-center, first-in-human Phase 1 study evaluating the safety of BTX-A51 in patients with R/R AML or high-risk MDS. The trial will be performed in two phases, a dose escalation (phase 1a) and dose expansion (phase 1b). Phase 1a utilizes a hybrid accelerated titration with single patient cohorts and a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design to assess 8 potential dosing cohorts. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be the dose for which the isotonic estimate of the toxicity rate is closest to the target toxicity rate of 0.3. Up to a maximum of 35 patients will be enrolled in the dose escalation phase of the study at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, MD Anderson Cancer Center, and City of Hope Cancer Center. Following determination of the MTD, 15 patients will be enrolled in the dose expansion phase for further evaluation of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and for preliminary evidence of efficacy. BTX-A51 will be dosed 3 weeks on drug, followed by 1 week off drug over a 28-day cycle. For the first cycle, patients will receive tumor lysis syndrome prophylaxis with allopurinol and intravenous fluids and be closely monitored. Key inclusion criteria are age ³ 18 years, R/R AML or R/R high-risk MDS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) £ 2 and life expectancy of ³ 6 weeks, and adequate kidney and liver function. Key exclusion criteria are receipt of cancer chemotherapy (other than hydroxyurea) within 2 weeks prior to the start of study drug, transplantation within 3 months prior to screening, active graft-versus-host disease requiring systemic immunosuppressive medications, and a white blood cell count > 20 × 109/L. The primary objective for the Phase 1 study is to determine the MTD and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of BTX-A51. Secondary objectives include evaluating overall response (complete remission, complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery, and partial remission) according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 criteria (Döhner et al. Blood. 2017), survival (overall survival and event-free survival) and pharmacokinetics. Correlative objectives include determining the changes in SEs and SE-driven expression of antiapoptotic genes by chromatin immunoprecipitation and RNA-sequencing. Recruitment is ongoing and this trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04243785 Disclosures Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Borthakur:BioLine Rx: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; FTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; BioTherix: Consultancy; Curio Science LLC: Consultancy; Xbiotech USA: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Polaris: Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BioLine Rx: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Nkarta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Treadwell Therapeutics: Consultancy. Murray:Salamandra: Current Employment. Kook:Salamandra: Current Employment. Chan:BioTheryx: Current Employment. Stein:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Biotheryx: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Elotuzumab In Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results of a Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.986.986 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 986-986 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Philippe Moreau ◽

Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽

Thierry Facon ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Infusion Reactions

Abstract Abstract 986 Introduction: Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody directed against CS1, an antigen highly and uniformly expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) cells but with restricted expression on normal cells. Elotuzumab exhibits significant antimyeloma activity in vitro and against MM xenografts, and its antitumor activity is enhanced independently by both lenalidomide and dexamethasone. In a dose-escalation phase 1 study that evaluated the combination of elotuzumab (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg), lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and the combination showed encouraging clinical activity (82% response rate) in patients with advanced MM. The most frequent infusion-related adverse events (AEs) were headache (21%), nausea (21%), and dizziness (11%), with 7% (2/28) of patients experiencing 3 serious infusion-related AEs during cycle 1 (1 with a grade 4 hypersensitivity reaction and 1 with 2 grade 3 stridor events). Key objectives of this dose randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study in patients with relapsed MM were to select the optimum dose of elotuzumab and to evaluate an enhanced premedication regimen to minimize the occurrence of infusion reactions. Methods: Patients with confirmed relapsed and/or refractory MM who had received 1–3 prior therapies were enrolled; prior lenalidomide therapy was excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive elotuzumab either 10 or 20 mg/kg (IV infusion on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle in the first 2 cycles and then days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles), along with lenalidomide 25 mg PO daily on days 1 to 21 and dexamethasone 40 mg PO weekly. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, if earlier. To control potential infusion reactions, patients received methylprednisolone (50 mg IV), diphenhydramine (25–50 mg PO or IV) or equivalent, ranitidine (50 mg IV) or equivalent, and acetaminophen (650–1000 mg PO) 30 to 60 minutes prior to each elotuzumab infusion. Objective responses (OR) were assessed according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Results: As of July 8, 2010, a total of 59 patients were randomized (intent to treat population); 47 patients received at least 1 dose of study medication (safety population); and 26 patients completed or progressed prior to completing 2 cycles of treatment (efficacy population). Median age was 64 years; 36 (61%) had received ≥2 prior therapies; 28 (48%) and 31 (53%) had received bortezomib or thalidomide, respectively, and 40 (68%) had undergone transplantation. Among efficacy evaluable patients, 22/26 (85%) had a confirmed or an unconfirmed response (≥ PR) including 31% VGPR/CR. The remaining 4/26 (15%) had stable disease (Table). Treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 36/47 patients (77%); the most common events were fatigue (26%) and nausea (21%). Serious treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 22% of patients; 2 events, nausea and febrile neutropenia with thrombocytopenia, were considered to be related to elotuzumab and lenalidomide. The most common infusion-related AEs within 24 hours of elotuzumab infusion were dizziness (15%), nausea (15%), and headache (9%). These decreased in frequency after the first treatment cycle. There were no severe AEs associated with infusion reactions. Conclusion: The combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone resulted in a high response rate in patients with advanced MM and was generally well tolerated. These results are consistent with the results previously reported from the phase 1 study. The revised premedication regimen appeared to be more effective in controlling infusion reactions, which were generally mild to moderate with no severe infusion reactions reported to date. Updated response and safety data on all patients by dose level will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Richardson: Millennium, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide. Moreau:Celgene, Facet, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Jakubowiak:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson Ortho-Centocor: Honoraria; Millennium, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium, Celgene, Centocor-Ortho Biotech: Speakers Bureau. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Millennium, Takeda Pharm, Janssen: Honoraria. Vij:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Reece:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rossi:Sanofi-Aventis, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tsao:Facet Biotech: Employment. Fry:Facet Biotech: Employment. Berman:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Singhal:Facet Biotech: Employment. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Onyx: Advisory Board, Consultancy; Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1 Study Of ARRY-520 With Bortezomib (BTZ) and Dexamethasone (dex) In Relapsed Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1938.1938 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1938-1938 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Ajai Chari ◽

Myo Htut ◽

Jeffrey Zonder ◽

Joseph W. Fay ◽

Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Initial Dose ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Ksp Inhibitor

Abstract Background ARRY-520 is a novel KSP inhibitor with encouraging activity in patients (pts) with RRMM. In preclinical models, the activity of ARRY-520 is synergistic with BTZ, providing a rationale to combine these drugs in the clinic. Methods ARRAY-520-111 is a Phase 1 study to identify the maximum tolerated dose of ARRY-520, BTZ and dex. Eligible pts have RRMM with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory agent. ARRY-520 is administered intravenously (IV) on Days 1, 2, 15 and 16 (Schedule 1) or on Days 1 and 15 (Schedule 2); BTZ is administered IV or subcutaneously (SC) on Days 1, 8 and 15; and 40 mg oral dex, if applicable, is taken on Days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle. Results A total of 41 pts have been treated to date at various dose levels of ARRY-520 and BTZ. Patients had a median of 5 prior regimens (range 2-10). All pts received a prior PI, 39 pts received prior BTZ, and 25 pts received at least 2 prior PI- including regimens (range 1-6). In Schedule 1, the initial dose level of ARRY-520 (1.0 mg/m2/day) with BTZ (1.3 mg/m2/day) and dex was not tolerated, with dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in 2/3 pts (pneumonia and pseudomonal sepsis). After a protocol amendment, dose escalation resumed at reduced doses of ARRY-520 (0.5 mg/m2/day) and BTZ (1.0 mg/m2/day) without dex. The addition of prophylactic filgrastim (G-CSF) enabled escalation to full dose ARRY-520 and BTZ (1.5 and 1.3 mg/m2/day, respectively). Only 1 DLT of pneumonia was observed during the further dose escalation, at 1.0 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 and 1.0 mg/m2/day BTZ. Dex has been added to the combination at 1.25 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 and 1.3 mg/m2/day BTZ and this dose level has been well tolerated. Enrollment is ongoing in the final planned dose level. In Schedule 2, the initial dose level of ARRY-520 (2.25 mg/m2/day) with BTZ (1.3 mg/m2/day) and dex was well tolerated and enrollment is ongoing at 3.0 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 and 1.3 mg/m2/day BTZ + dex, the maximum planned dose of both drugs. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) (in ≥ 15% of pts) include anemia, diarrhea, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infection, thrombocytopenia, cough, neutropenia, constipation, headache, fatigue, hyperuricemia, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. All Grade 3 – 4 non-hematologic AEs have an incidence of < 10%. Based on the laboratory data, Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 15% of patients, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 10%. Apart from the one pt described above with the DLT of pseudomonal sepsis, no other febrile neutropenic events were reported. Neuropathy (Grade 2) was observed in 1 pt. Monopolar spindles have been observed in a post-dose biopsy for a pt treated at 1.0 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 + 1.3 mg/m2/day BTZ, indicating that pharmacodynamic activity of ARRY-520 is maintained in the presence of full dose BTZ. Preliminary signs of efficacy have been observed in this ongoing dose-escalation study. To date, among the subset of 13 evaluable pts who received doses at ≥ 1.25 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 + 1.3 mg/m2/day BTZ, 4 (31%) partial responses (PR) and 1 minimal response (MR) have been observed. By contrast, in the 27 patients receiving lower doses of ARRY-520 and BTZ, only 1 MR has been reported. An additional 29 pts experienced stable disease (SD) on ARRY-520 + weekly BTZ without the use of steroids (dex), including 17 pts with disease refractory to BTZ. Conclusions ARRY-520 + BTZ with prophylactic G-CSF appears well tolerated with manageable non-hematologic AEs in this heavily pretreated pt population and has demonstrated preliminary evidence of activity, including PRs and SD in pts with disease refractory to BTZ. These data support further exploration of this novel KSP inhibitor in combination with BTZ in expansion cohorts. The authors would like to acknowledge the dedicated research staff and physicians at the participating centers of the Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium for their contribution to this study. Disclosures: Chari: Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: ARRY-520 is an investigational drug being combined with bortezomib in multiple myeloma. Zonder:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Skyline Diagnostics: Consultancy. Jakubowiak:Millenuim: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hilder:Array BioPharma: Employment. Ptaszynski:Array BioPharma: Employment. Rush:Array BioPharma: Employment. Kaufman:Millenium: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1 Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, and Ara-C in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2550.2550 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2550-2550

Author(s):

Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽

Amir T. Fathi ◽

Lillian Werner ◽

David Avigan ◽

Katarina Luptakova ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Complete Remission ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Dose Group ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Aml ◽

Count Recovery

Abstract Background: The prognosis for patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains extremely poor. Standard reinduction regimens, such as mitoxantrone, etoposide, and ara-C (MEC), have been associated with complete remission rates in the 23 to 30% range. Lenalidomide (Len), an immunomodulatory drug, has efficacy in relapsed AML and has been shown to augment the effects of standard chemotherapies (anthracyclines and ara-C) in preclinical AML studies. These data prompted the current phase 1 study of Len in combination with MEC in pts with relapsed AML. Methods: The trial included pts (≥ 18 yrs) with relapsed or refractory AML. The primary objective was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Len when given in combination with MEC. Secondary objectives included safety, efficacy and time to count recovery. The study examined escalating doses (5-10 mg) of Len given daily for the first 14 days in combination with standard MEC doses of mitoxantrone (8 mg/m2/d), etoposide (100 mg/m2/d), and ara-C (1000 mg/m2/d) on days 4 through 8. Due to observations of prolonged count recovery, the Len dosing schedule was amended by reducing the duration of treatment to 10 days starting on Day 1. The dose of len was then re-escalated starting at 5 mg/d (5-10-25-50). A standard 3+3 dose-escalation design was used. Dose limiting toxicity was defined as Grade IV rash or Grade IV neuropathy during the first 28 day period, or delayed neutrophil (ANC <500/mL) or platelet (platelet count <20,000/mL) recovery beyond Day 45 after start of re-induction chemotherapy in the absence of persistent AML. Pts achieving a complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) went on to consolidation chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the discretion of the treating physician. Results: A total of 33 pts have been enrolled in the study (25 escalation phase [5 mg days 1-14, n=3; 10 mg days 1-14, n=6; 5 mg days 1-10, n=3; 10 mg days 1-10, n=3; 25 mg days 1-10, n=3; 50 mg days 1-10, n=6] and 8 expansion phase pts at 50 mg/d days 1-10). One patient was enrolled, found to be ineligible, and not treated. The median age was 62 years (range, 28-74), 45% were male and the median number of prior treatments was 2. Three dose limiting toxicities, all due to delayed count recovery past day 45, were observed in the escalation phase (n = 2/6 pts in the 10 mg/d day1-14 dose group and n = 1/6 in the in the 50 mg/d day1-10 dose group). The RP2D of Len in combination with MEC was 50 mg/d on days 1-10. Among the 14 pts treated at the RP2D, common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality were mainly hematologic including febrile neutropenia (36%). Overall 4 pts including none treated at the RP2D died during treatment. All of the on-treatment deaths, (grade 5 sepsis, n =1; infection, n=1; respiratory failure, n =2), were determined to be unrelated to the study drug. 32 pts were evaluable for response (one pt too early for assessment) with 12 pts achieving a CR and 1 pt a CRi with a total CR/CRi rate of 41% (95% CI: 24-59%). The median time to a neutrophil count of 1500/mL was 30 days and to a platelet count of 100,000/mL was 22 days. Conclusions: Len in combination with MEC re-induction chemotherapy for pts with relapsed or refractory AML was generally well tolerated and associated with an improved response rate as compared to historical controls. The safety profile was consistent with reported events in other MEC chemotherapy trials. Overall, these data suggest further exploration of high-dose Len in combination with MEC. Disclosures DeAngelo: Celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Off Label Use: lenalidomide in AML. Fathi:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelexis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy. Steensma:Incyte: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy. Attar:Agios: Employment. Stone:Abbvie: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celator: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy, Other: DSMB for clinical trial; Roche/Genetech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; AROG: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Clinical Results from a Phase 1 Study of ACTR707 in Combination with Rituximab in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory CD20+ non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125995 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1587-1587

Author(s):

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Jason R. Westin ◽

Jonathon B. Cohen ◽

Luke P. Akard ◽

Samantha Jaglowski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Clinical Responses

Background: The Antibody-Coupled T-cell Receptor (ACTR) platform is an autologous engineered T-cell therapy that combines the cell-killing ability of T cells and the tumor-targeting ability of co-administered antibodies to exert potent antitumor immune responses. ACTR707 comprises the extracellular domain of CD16 linked to a CD3ζ signaling domain and a CD28 co-stimulatory domain. ACTR707 is in clinical development in combination with rituximab (NCT03189836) or trastuzumab (NCT03680560). Here we present clinical findings from the dose escalation phase of Study ATTCK-20-03, an ongoing, multicenter, phase 1 study of ACTR707+rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD20+ NHL. Methods: The primary objectives of this first-in-human study are to evaluate the safety of the combination of ACTR707 and rituximab and to determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Other objectives include evaluating antitumor activity and ACTR T-cell persistence. Subjects must have CD20+ NHL that is R/R after prior treatments, which must include anti-CD20 antibody-containing chemotherapy. Subjects receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) for 3 days, followed by rituximab and a single dose of ACTR707. Additional doses of rituximab are administered q3w until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Investigator decision. The study includes a dose escalation phase (increasing doses of ACTR707 with fixed dose of rituximab at 375 mg/m2 q3w) and an expansion phase at the RP2D. Results: Six subjects received ACTR707 at Dose Level 1 (DL1; 23-38×106 ACTR+ T cells), 3 subjects at DL2 (30-50×106 ACTR+ T cells), and 5 subjects at DL3 (45-55×106 ACTR+ T cells). The majority of the subjects were diagnosed with DLBCL (93%) and had refractory disease (71%), defined as progressive disease as the best response to any prior treatment or relapse <1 year post autologous stem cell transplant. In DL1 through DL3, as of 27 May 2019, there were no dose-limiting toxicities, AEs of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), serious or severe neurologic AEs, or AEs leading to deaths on treatment. TEAEs reported in >2 subjects, regardless of causality or grade, included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, cough, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. SAEs considered possibly related to ACTR707 were febrile neutropenia (n=2) and cytopenia (n=1). ACTR707 expansion generally reached peak levels within 1 to 2 weeks after administration. All subjects with complete response (CR) up to 1 year had detectable ACTR at the last timepoint evaluated. Higher ACTR707 CD8:CD4 T-cell ratios were associated with clinical responses. Clinical activity was reported across DL1 through DL3, with an overall response rate of 64% including durable complete responses (CRs), with one subject in CR for 387+ days (Table 1). Conclusions: Data available from DL1 through DL3 of ACTR707+rituximab suggest that clinical responses can be achieved without severe T cell-mediated toxicities (eg, CRS and neurotoxicity) that have been reported with other autologous T-cell products. Dose escalation continues at a target dose of 80×106 ACTR+ T cells; enrollment in DL4 (n=6) was recently completed. Updated data, including identified correlates of clinical outcomes, will be presented for DL1 through DL4. Disclosures Flinn: TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma, Agios, Calithera Biosciences, Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Westin:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; 47 Inc: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Cohen:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; UNUM: Research Funding; Hutchison: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Lymphoma Research Foundation: Research Funding; ASH: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Akard:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Jaglowski:Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Sachs:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Ranger:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Harris:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Payumo:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Bachanova:Celgene: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GT Biopharma: Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

An Interim Report on a Phase 1/2 Study of HPN217, a Half-Life Extended Tri-Specific T Cell Activating Construct (TriTAC ®) Targeting B Cell Maturation Antigen for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148176 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1654-1654

Author(s):

Sumit Madan ◽

Al-Ola Abdallah ◽

Andrew J. Cowan ◽

William I. Bensinger ◽

Jens Hillengass ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Half Life ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Life Extension ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Activation Markers ◽

B Cell Maturation

Abstract Background B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a clinically validated target for multiple myeloma (MM) based on its restricted expression profile and potential functional role in promoting MM cell survival. HPN217 is a BCMA-targeting T cell engager derived from the Harpoon Tri-specific T cell Activating Construct (TriTAC ®) platform. It is a recombinant polypeptide of approximately 50 kDa, engineered to be a small globular protein to enable efficient drug diffusion and exposure in tumor tissue and have a prolonged serum half-life at the same time. It contains three humanized antibody-derived binding domains, targeting BCMA for MM cell binding, albumin for half-life extension, and CD3ε for T cell engagement, activation, and cytolytic function differentiation. Methods The ongoing Phase 1 study initially evaluates escalating doses of once weekly IV administrations of HPN217 in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM who have received at least 3 prior therapies including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and a CD38-targeted therapy. Prior exposure to BCMA-targeting agent is permitted for this initial part of the trial. Premedication to minimize cytokine release syndrome (CRS) includes dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, acetaminophen, and a proton pump inhibitor. Primary endpoints are safety, tolerability, and determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives are pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and preliminary anti-myeloma activity. Results As of July 5, 2021, 22 patients have been treated with HPN217 in 8 individual cohorts ranging from 5 to 2150 µg/week. Patients treated received a median of 8 (range of 4 - 16) prior systemic regimens, including 5 patients who received prior BCMA-targeted belantamab mafodotin or orvacabtagene autoleucel. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) have been observed and MTD has not been reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are hematological changes including anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. No CRS was observed in dose cohorts receiving 5 - 270 µg/week (n=7). CRS (Grade 1, 2) was observed in 4 of 15 patients receiving ≥810 µg/week. In one patient treated at 810 µg/week, transient elevated liver transaminases (Grade 4 AST and Grade 3 ALT) was observed. A second patient in the 270 µg/week cohort also showed Grade 1 AST increase. All CRS events and liver enzyme increases resolved, and all patients were successfully re-treated with escalating doses. HPN217 demonstrated a dose proportional increase in Cmax and AUC with a median serum half-life of 74 hours (range of 38 - 197 hours), confirming half-life extension. Half-life, clearance rate, and volume of distribution were dose-independent, suggesting linear PK kinetics. Pharmacodynamic analysis shows a dose-dependent, transient increases in serum cytokines and chemokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNFα). A transient reduction in circulating T lymphocytes accompanied by upregulation of the activation markers CD25 and CD69 were also observed. Patient response to treatment will be reported. Conclusions HPN217 represents a novel half-life extended BCMA-targeting T cell engager that can be safely administered to patients with R/R MM at a dose of up to 2150 µg weekly. TEAEs have been transient and manageable. Transient serum cytokine/chemokine increase, T cell margination and upregulation of T cell activation markers, indicate target engagement of BCMA on plasma cells and CD3 on T cells, respectively, supporting the proposed mechanism of action for HPN217. Dose escalation, including implementation of step dosing, with the goal of establishing an RP2D regimen, is ongoing. NCT04184050 Disclosures Madan: Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Cowan: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy; Nektar: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Harpoon: Research Funding. Bensinger: BMS, Janssen, Poseida, Regeneron, Trillium: Research Funding; Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Hillengass: Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Curio Science: Speakers Bureau; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beijing Medical Award Foundation: Speakers Bureau; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Skyline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Axxess Network: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beijing Life Oasis Public Service Center: Speakers Bureau. Leleu: Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Carsgen Therapeutics Ltd: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support. Lipe: Seagen Inc.: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; sanofi: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; amgen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Harpoon: Research Funding. Nath: Harpoon Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sun: Harpoon Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months.

Download Full-text

FT-2102, an IDH1m Inhibitor, in Combination with Azacitidine in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Ayndrome (MDS): Results from a Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114126 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1452-1452 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Justin Watts ◽

Thomas Prebet ◽

Gary J. Schiller ◽

Sangmin Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Advisory Committee ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Clinical Data ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Inadequate Response ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations (IDH1m) occur in 7-14% of AML patients and 3% of MDS patients. Mutated IDH1 metabolizes alpha-ketoglutarate into 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite that impairs differentiation. FT-2102 is an oral, highly potent, selective small molecule inhibitor of mutated IDH1, with the therapeutic potential to restore normal cellular differentiation. Azacitidine (AZA), a hypomethylating agent (HMA), is a standard of care for MDS and for AML patients unfit for intensive therapy. We present Phase 1 clinical data from the ongoing Phase 1/2 study of FT-2102 in combination with azacitidine (FT-2102+AZA) in patients with IDH1m AML and MDS (CT.gov: NCT02719574). Methods: A Phase 1 study was initiated to evaluate the safety, PK/PD, and antileukemic activity of FT-2102 in patients with IDH1m AML or MDS and included both dose escalation and expansion. FT-2102 was administered daily (150 QD or 150 BID) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity; AZA was administered at 75 mg/m2 IV or SC daily for 7 days of each 28-day cycle. Eligible patients had IDH1m AML/MDS that was relapsed/refractory (R/R) or treatment-naïve (TN), were eligible for AZA therapy and had adequate liver and renal function. Prior IDH1 inhibitors and hypomethylating agents were allowed, and there were no restrictions for concomitant non-anticancer medications. Investigator-assessed responses were per modified IWG 2003/2006 criteria. Efficacy was assessed at Cycle 2 Day 1 and as clinically indicated thereafter. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed throughout the study per NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Results: At the time of the data cutoff, 07 April 2018, 27 patients had been enrolled and 26 had been treated with FT-2102+AZA, with a median of 3 months on treatment (range: 0.2 to 12 months). Of the 27 enrolled patients, 24 had AML (20 R/R; 4 TN) and 3 patients had MDS (all TN). The median number of prior antileukemia therapies was 3 (range: 0-5) in the AML patients. Doses of FT-2102 were 150 mg QD (n=7) and 150 mg BID (n=20). Thirteen (50%) patients discontinued treatment, with the most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were hematopoietic stem cell transplant (n=4), death (n=2), and progressive disease (n=2). No patients discontinued due to an AE. Severe (≥ Grade 3) AEs occurring in ≥ 5% of patients included febrile neutropenia (27%), anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis (19% each), fatigue, hypertension, neutropenia (15% each), nausea, pneumonia, hypokalemia (12% each) and abdominal pain (8%). Three patients had differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS), which resolved with FT-2102 temporary interruption, and treatment with dexamethasone, hydroxyurea, and supportive care in all three. Five patients died within 28-days of the last dose of study drug, none of which were considered related to FT-2102+AZA. No DLTs were observed during dose escalation. PK analysis demonstrated no impact of AZA on steady-state exposure of FT-2102. 2-HG levels to normal levels by C2D1. Table 1 shows the Investigator-assessed ORR per IWG. Responses have been seen as early as 1 month on treatment, and stable disease for greater than 6 months; 50% of patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: FT-2102+AZA is well tolerated in AML and MDS, with 150 mg BID selected as the RP2D based on safety, PK and PD (2-HG) response. Clinical activity has been observed, with an ORR of 42%. Durable CRs (>12 months) have been observed. The current data support the continued evaluation of FT-2102 150 mg BID+AZA in the Phase 2 study. Three Phase 2 combination therapy cohorts are currently open for enrollment in patients < 60 years with R/R AML or MDS naïve to HMA and IDH1m inhibitors; R/R AML or MDS with inadequate response/PD on HMA, and R/R AML or MDS who have progressed on a prior IDH1m inhibitor. Updated clinical data will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures Cortes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schiller:Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Lee:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Clinipace: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. Wang:Amgen: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ferrell:Incyte: Research Funding. Jonas:LP Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Kalobios: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Accelerated Medical Diagnostics: Research Funding; Tolero: Consultancy; Esanex: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Wei:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding. Montesinos:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kelly:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Li:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Sweeney:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Watson:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Mohamed:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1 Study of NKX019, a CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor Natural Killer (CAR NK) Cell Therapy, in Subjects with B-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146602 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3868-3868

Author(s):

Michael Dickinson ◽

Nada Hamad ◽

Christian E Bryant ◽

Gautam Borthakur ◽

Chitra Hosing ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

B Cell ◽

Nk Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Car T

Abstract Background: B-cell lineage cancers are a worldwide healthcare burden. Over 500,000 new cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 50,000 new cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are diagnosed world-wide each year (seer.cancer.gov, Smith 2015, Solomon 2017). Despite progress in treatment, many patients diagnosed with this heterogeneous group of cancers still succumb to their disease. Recently approved autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells specific for CD19 have altered the treatment landscape for some patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies, though significant toxicities associated with T-cell expansion and the necessity for bespoke manufacturing have limited their use. Natural killer (NK) cells, part of the innate immune system, efficiently recognize transformed cells and are particularly suited to address limitations of the approved CAR T products (Marcus 2014, Morvan 2016). Lacking a T-cell receptor and the consequent clonal expansion, non-engineered NK cells have been safely administered after lymphodepletion without side effects typically associated with T-cell therapies, such as severe cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity (Bachier 2020). Allogeneic NK cell-based therapies allow off-the-shelf use, obviating the necessity to wait for manufacture of autologous T-cell therapies. CD19-directed CAR NK cells have been administered safely, with promising preliminary efficacy (Liu 2020). NKX019 is a cryopreserved product, composed of expanded NK cells engineered to express a humanized CAR against CD19, fused to co-stimulatory (OX40) and signaling (CD3ζ) domains to enhance their intrinsic antitumor activity. NKX019 also expresses a membrane-bound interleukin-15 (IL-15) to serve as an autocrine growth factor and thereby increase NKX019 persistence, with an in vivo half-life of over up to 28 days without systemic IL-2 support. Preclinical characterization has shown that NKX019 cells are 10 times more effective at killing CD19+ target cells than non-engineered NK cells, resulting in greater suppression of xenograft tumor models (Morisot 2020). Further, NKX019, unlike CD19 CAR T cells, retained cytotoxicity even when CD19 antigen density was reduced >50x on target cells. Hence, clinical evaluation of NKX019 is being undertaken in this Phase 1 study in subjects with R/R NHL or ALL. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, Phase 1 study of NKX019 (Figure). The study will be conducted in 2 parts: Part 1 (dose finding) to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of NKX019 separately in adult patients with CAR T naïve R/R NHL or B-ALL, utilizing a "3+3" enrollment schema. Part 2 (dose expansion) will further evaluate safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, pharmacodynamics (PDn), and antitumor activity of NKX019 using RP2D with separate expansion cohorts for patients with ALL as well as different subtypes of NHL, including a cohort of CAR T pretreated large B-cell lymphoma. NKX019 is being manufactured from NK cells obtained from healthy adult donors. The study evaluates two dose levels of NKX019: 3 × 10 8 and 1 × 10 9 viable CAR+ NK cells. NKX019 will be administered on Days 0, 7, and 14 of a 28-day cycle following standard fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion (Table). Up to 5 total cycles may be administered based on response and tolerability assessed at the end of each cycle. The primary endpoint is incidence of adverse events, dose-limiting toxicities, clinically significant laboratory abnormalities, and determination of the RP2D. Secondary endpoints include evaluation of standard cellular PK parameters, PDn, immunogenicity, and antitumor responses. Subjects will be assessed for efficacy using disease-specific criteria: Lugano classification with LYRIC refinement for pseudo-progression (NHL), 2018 International Workshop (IW) criteria (CLL), 6th IW criteria (Waldenström macroglobulinemia [WM]), and National Comprehensive Cancer Version 1.2020 (B-ALL) (Cheson 2006, Cheson 2014, Hallek 2018, Owen 2013, Brown 2020). Enrollment across multiple sites in the US and Australia is expected to start in the second half of 2021. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Dickinson: Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hamad: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Bryant: Jansen, BMS/Celgene, Skyline Diagnostics: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria. Borthakur: Astex: Research Funding; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: Current Employment; Protagonist: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy; Ryvu: Research Funding; ArgenX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hosing: Nkarta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shook: Nkarta Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tan: Nkarta Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rajangam: Nkarta Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Liu: SITC: Honoraria; BMS; Karyopharm; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Agios; NGM Biopharmaceuticals; BeiGene: Consultancy. McSweeney: Kite-Gilead: Consultancy; Kite-Gilead, Autolus, Novartis: Research Funding; Kite-Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hill: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZenica: Consultancy, Honoraria; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte/Morphysis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gentenech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene (BMS): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text