Prognostic Value of BCR-ABL1 Transcript Type in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated Frontline with Nilotinib

Abstract Background. The fusion protein encoded by the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene may differ in size, but the great majority of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients have a e13a2 (b2a2) or a e14a2 (b3a2) junction. In CML patients treated frontline with imatinib, the e14a2 transcript has been recently associated to faster and deeper molecular responses; in some studies a better outcome has been also reported. Very limited information on the prognostic impact of the BCR-ABL1 transcript type in CML patients treated frontline with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is still available: a study from MDACC reported lower molecular response rates and a trend for inferior event-free survival in e13a2 patients. Aim. To evaluate if the BCR-ABL1 transcript type (e14a2 vs e13a2) affect the response and the clinical outcome in newly diagnosed adult CML patients treated frontline with nilotinib (NIL). Methods. An analysis of 345 CML patients in early chronic phase (ECP) enrolled within 3 multicentric prospective studies of the GIMEMA CML Working Party (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00481052, NCT00769327, NCT01535391) was performed. The initial treatment was NIL 300 mg BID or NIL 400 mg BID. Definitions: major molecular response (MMR), BCR-ABL1IS ratio < 0.1%; deep molecular response (MR4.0), BCR-ABL1IS ratio < 0.01% with > 10,000 ABL1 copies; progression, transformation to advanced phases; death, at any time and for any reason. Cumulative incidences of response were estimated under consideration of competing risks (progression, death) and compared by Gray test. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Results. Seven patients expressing rare transcripts (e1a2 or e19a2) and 10 patients with unknown transcript type were excluded: 328 out of 345 patients were evaluable, 124 (38%) with e13a2 transcript, 174 (53%) with e14a2 transcript and 30 (9%) expressing both transcripts. The baseline characteristics of patients with e13a2 or e14a2 transcripts were comparable: no significant differences in age, gender, Sokal or EUTOS long-term survival score distribution, presence of clonal chromosomal abnormalities in Ph+ cells, NIL dose were observed; the only difference was a higher platelet count in patients with e14a2 transcript (median 374 vs 313 x 103/µl, p=0.006). The median follow-up was 60 months in both groups (range 24-82 months). The response rates and the survival probabilities were uniformly lower in patients with e13a2 transcript (N=124) compared to patients with e14a2 transcript (N=174), but the differences were not significant: MMR by 12 months, 66% vs 72%, p=0.244; MR4.0 by 36 months, 56% vs 66%, p=0.067; estimated cumulative incidence of MMR, 82% vs 88%, p=0.135; estimated cumulative incidence of MR4.0, 60% vs 69%, p=0.101; estimated PFS, 88% vs 93%, p=0.547; estimated OS, 89% vs 94%, p=0.436 (Figure 1). The responses and the survival probabilities of patients co-expressing the e13a2 and the e14a2 transcripts (N=30) were similar to or even better than the ones of e14a2 patients. Grouping together the patients with e14a2 transcript alone and the patients with co-expression of both transcripts (N=174+30=204), and comparing them to patients with e13a2 transcript alone (N=124), the response differences became significant (cumulative incidence of MMR and MR4.0, p=0.050 and p=0.036, respectively), but no outcome differences emerged (PFS and OS, p=0.340 and p=0.276, respectively). Conclusions. Despite a trend for lower response rates and inferior outcome in patients with e13a2 transcript, the observed differences were small and mostly not significant. Further studies in larger patient cohorts are required to clarify whether nilotinib and other second generation TKIs are able to overcome the adverse prognostic impact of transcript type, potentially affecting the speed and the depth of molecular response, the probability of achieving a treatment-free remission and the patient outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Castagnetti: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gugliotta:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Ariad: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Carella:Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Tiribelli:Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bocchia:Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Soverini:Ariad: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Cavo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Martinelli:ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Rosti:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

The BCR-ABL1 Transcript Type Does Not Influence the Response and the Outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated Frontline with Nilotinib

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1680.1680 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1680-1680 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Fausto Castagnetti ◽

Gabriele Gugliotta ◽

Francesca Palandri ◽

Massimo Breccia ◽

Fabio Stagno ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Transcript Type

Abstract Abstract 1680 Background. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the presence of the BCR-ABL1 hybrid gene. Different types of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts can be found, but the most frequent are the e13a2 (b2a2) and the e14a2 (b3a2). In the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) era, few data about the prognostic significance of the transcript type in early chronic phase (ECP) CML are available. Three larger studies suggested that the e13a2 transcript may have an adverse prognostic impact in ECP CML patients treated with imatinib (IM): Vega-Ruiz et al. (251 patients, ASH 2007) reported inferior molecular responses; Lucas et al. (71 patients, Haematologica 2009) reported lower cytogenetic response rates and lower event-free survival (EFS); the GIMEMA CML WP (493 patients, EHA 2011) reported a slower time to major molecular response (MMR) with inferior EFS and progression-free survival (PFS). To our knowledge this is the first evaluation of the prognostic influence of the BCR-ABL1 transcript type on the responses and the outcome of ECP CML treated frontline with nilotinib (NIL). Methods. The CML Italian Registry of Nilotinib includes 215 patients treated with NIL-based regimens. The patients were enrolled within 2 multicenter phase II studies conducted by the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT00481052 and NCT00769327) or treated at the “S. Orsola-Malpighi” University Hospital (Bologna, Italy), with NIL 300 mg BID or 400 mg BID as initial treatment. All the registered patients were analyzed. Patients expressing rare transcripts and patients with both b2a2 and b3a2 transcripts were excluded: 201 out of 215 patients were evaluable, 81 (40%) with e13a2 transcript and 120 (60%) with e14a2 transcript. Differences between groups were tested using χ2 test, Fisher exact test or t-test, as appropriate. Response monitoring: conventional cytogenetic examination (bone marrow) and QPCR (peripheral blood). Definitions: MMR: BCR-ABLIS ratio <0.1% (International Scale); failures: according to 2009 ELN recommendations; events: failure or treatment discontinuation for any reason. The time-to-response and the outcome were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared by log-rank test. Results. The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable (no significant differences in age, Sokal/Hasford/EUTOS score distribution, clonal chromosomal abnormalities in Ph+ cells, NIL dose), except for the percentage of basophils in the peripheral blood, higher in patients with e14a2 transcript (3.4% vs 2.3%, p=0.01). The median observation was 29 months (range 18–47); 92% of the patients had at least 2 year observation. The CCgR and MMR rates at 12 months were comparable in the 2 groups. The time to MMR was longer for patients with e13a2 transcript (6 months vs 3 months, p=0.04), but the overall CCgR rates (93.8 vs 91.7, p=0.79) and the overall MMR rates (85.1 vs 90.0, p=0.38) were not significantly different in patients with e13a2 or e14a2 transcript, respectively. The probability of Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Failure-Free Survival (FFS) were comparable: 91.4% vs 95.8% (p=0.61), 90.7% vs 95.0% (p=0.51), and 90.7% vs 88.7% (p=0.40) in patients with e13a2 and e14a2 transcript, respectively. Conclusions. In our experience, based on 201 early CP CML patients treated frontline with NIL with a minimum follow-up of 18 months, the BCR-ABL transcript type did not show any relevant prognostic impact. The time to MMR was longer in patients with e13a2 transcript, but no response and outcome differences have been observed so far. The number of observed events was low and a longer observation is required. Acknowledgments. European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, Bologna University, BolognAIL Disclosures: Castagnetti: Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gugliotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Cavazzini:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Turri:Novartis: Consultancy, Novartis Other; Bristol Myers Squibb: Bristol Myers Squibb, Bristol Myers Squibb Other, Consultancy. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rosti:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Specific Drug Transporter Genotypes Are Significantly Associated with Increased Rates of Major and Complete Molecular Responses In Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Imatinib – A TOPS Correlative Substudy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.670.670 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 670-670

Author(s):

Simona Soverini ◽

Sabrina Angelini ◽

Eleonora Turrini ◽

Matt Burnett ◽

Gloria Ravegnini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

First Line ◽

Favorable Alleles ◽

Summary Measures

Abstract Abstract 670 The availability of multiple options for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment is not paralleled by the availability of biological predictors of outcome allowing to identify patients (pts) who are more likely to benefit from dasatinib or nilotinib rather than imatinib (IM). Pharmacogenetics has proven a potential source of biomarkers given the known influence of polymorphisms in key genes encoding drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes on drug delivery – hence effectiveness. In CML, only two studies had so far explored this field, but both were conducted in heterogeneous populations including pts at different stages of disease, not all receiving IM first-line. We thus aimed to investigate a panel of 20 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ABCB1, ABCG2, SLC22A1, OATP1A2, OCTN1, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes that can be hypothesized to influence IM transport and metabolism in 189 newly diagnosed CML pts enrolled in the TOPS phase III trial (Cortes et al, J Clin Oncol 2010). Pts selection was exclusively based on availability of written informed consent and sufficient amount of archived material. Median age was 46 years; male to female ratio was 103 to 86; 156 (83%) pts were Caucasian and 23 (12%) were Asian; low, intermediate and high Sokal risk pts were 84 (44.4%), 65 (34.4%) and 40 (21.2%), respectively. Baseline demographic/clinical features did not differ significantly from those of the overall population. Treatment outcomes (complete cytogenetic response [CCyR]; major molecular response [MMR] and complete molecular response [CMR]) were compared according to i) each candidate genotype ii) summary measures based on combinations of SNPs in the same gene and iii) summary measures based on combinations of SNPs in functionally related genes (uptake; efflux). CC genotype in OCTN1 had a favorable impact on the achievement of MMR at 12 months (MMR@12m; P = 0.03). With respect to the summary measures, combination of SNPs in the SLC22A1 gene was significantly correlated with MMR@12m (P = 0.03). When considering summary measures of uptake and efflux, the former was found to be associated with both MMR@12m and CMR@12m (P = 0.003 and P = 0.01, respectively). A separate analysis limited to Caucasian pts (n=156) yielded similar results (Table 1). In addition, the analysis in the Caucasian subgroup evidenced a significant association between the CC genotype in ABCB1 rs60023214 and MMR@12m (P = 0.005) (Table 1). Cumulative incidence plots based on the Kaplan-Meier method were also analyzed in the overall population and in Caucasians, with comparable results. Representative plots are shown in Figure 1. There was evidence for difference among MMR cumulative incidence curves for 2 single SNPs and 2 score measures. Presence of the major allele in OCTN1 (CC) and of the minor allele in CYP3A4 rs2740574 (GG) were associated with increased MMR rate (P = 0.028 and P = 0.042, respectively, in the overall population and P = 0.027 and P = 0.038, respectively, in Caucasians). Similarly, an increase in the number of favorable alleles in the SLC22A1 gene was associated with increased MMR rate (P = 0.030 and P = 0.043 in the overall population and in Caucasians, respectively). In addition, the combination of favorable alleles in the genes involved in IM uptake was associated with increased rates of both MMR and CMR (P = 0.004 and P = 0.015, respectively, in the overall population and P = 0.005 and P = 0.009, respectively, in Caucasians). Our results suggest that SNP genotyping might be helpful in selecting pts who are more likely to benefit from first-line use of more potent inhibitors. Further assessment of the SNPs here identified in larger series of pts is warranted. Supported by Novartis Oncology, Clinical Development, TOPS Correlative Studies Network Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria. White:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hatfield:Novartis: Employment. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Pediatrics — First Results From Study CML-PAED II.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.342.342 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 342-342 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Meinolf Suttorp ◽

Christian Thiede ◽

Josefine T Tauer ◽

Silja Roettgers ◽

Petr Sedlacek ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Side Effects ◽

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Bone Metabolism ◽

Treatment Response ◽

Muscle Pain ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Longitudinal Growth ◽

Molecular Response

Abstract Abstract 342 Background: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a rare malignancy in pediatrics. In this decade -like in adults- imatinib meyslate (IMA) has been established also as first line treatment for children with CML while allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) as treatment option is postponed for those cases becoming intolerant or refractory to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. However, results from controlled trials in children are lacking so far. We here report an analysis of pediatric data from patients (pts) with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-chromosome positive (Ph+) CML on up-front treatment with IMA. Pts and Methods: According to protocol CML-PAED II pediatric pts with confirmed diagnosis of Ph+ CML were treated in CP with IMA 300 mg/sqm once daily, while in accelerated phase (AP) or in blastic phase (BC) the dose was increased to 400 mg/sqm and 500 mg/sqm (bis daily), respectively. Initial and long-term clinical and laboratory data, treatment response and side effects were reported to the study center on standardized forms by the treating physician. Specimen from peripheral blood (pB) and bone marrow (BM) were assessed by cytogenetics and by quantitative RT-PCR for BCR-ABL transcript rates in central laboratories for standardized monitoring in three months intervals. Results: From 1. Jan 2004 until 31. Mrch 2009 a total of 51 pts (21 female, 30 male; median age: 10.6 yrs [range:1-20 yrs]) were registered: 10 pts with ongoing IMA treatment were recruited and analyzed retrospectively while 41 pts were enrolled prospectively from centers in Austria (n=1), Czech Rep. (n=6), Germany (n=40), Italy (n=1), Netherlands (n=1), Slovak Rep. (n=2). Stages of disease were: CP n=47; AP n=1; BC n=3 (two myeloid). Those four pts diagnosed in AP and BC underwent early SCT. Observed side effects in the whole group included: nausea (n=9), muscle pain (n=7), edema (n=3), rhabdomyolysis (n=1, short interruption of IMA), reduced blood cell count (n=2, short interruption of IMA in one pt), biochemical alterations in bone metabolism [for details see: N Engl J Med 2006;354:2006] (n = 8), impaired longitudinal growth (n=1, [Haematologica 2009;94:1177]). Two pts experienced intolerance (muscle pain) or toxicity (hepatic), respectively, therefore stopped IMA and were put on dasatinib after 4 and 10 months, respectively. Having achieved complete cytogenetic response (CyR) and 2 log-fold reduction of BCR-ABL transcript rate, one pt opted for SCT from her HLA-identical brother after 15 mo of treatment. Response rates in advanced stages of CML were as follows: in BC (n=3) two pts became hematological responders (HR), one pt exhibited partial HR. The only one pt diagnosed in AC exhibited partial CyR but complete HR. A landmark analysis in pts entering CML-paed II in CP exhibited that 2/42 pts (5%) had no complete HR at month 3; 2/28 (7%) had no complete CyR at month 12, and 2/19 (15%) pts achieved no major molecular response (MMR, defined as >0.1% BCR-ABL [Blood 2006;108:28–37]) at month 18 after start of IMA. Each two of those four patients with incomplete response (one pt with no CyR at month 12, one pt with no MMR at month 18) underwent SCT from a sibling donor and the other two pts stopped IMA and were put on dasatinib. With a median follow-up of 19 months (range: 0-63 months) all 47 pts diagnosed in CP are alive. Of note none of the six pts (median age at diagnosis: 5 yrs; range 1–13 years) treated by imatinib meanwhile for >36 months have opted for SCT. Conclusion: Keeping in mind that the number of pediatric pts is still small, IMA treatment for children and adolescents with CML in CP is associated -like in adults- with high treatment response rates. Refractoriness to IMA is uncommon and side effects seem tolerable, as only 10% of the total cohort stopped imatinib and were put on 2nd generation TKI. However, disturbances of bone metabolism and longitudinal growth impairment may be of special concern in this not yet outgrown cohort [N Engl J Med 2006;354:2006, Blood 2008;111:2538; Haematologica 2008;93:1101; Lancet 2008;372:111; Int J Hematol; 2009;89:251; Haematologica 2009;94:1177]. Only 3/47 pts not diagnosed in advanced phases of CML so far underwent SCT thus underlining that also in pediatrics SCT has been shifted to a second-line strategy for high-risk patients and those who failed therapy with IMA. Disclosures: Suttorp: Novartis : Research Funding. Thiede:Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Initial Molecular Response at 3 Months May Predict Both Response and Event-Free Survival at 24 Months in Imatinib-Resistant or -Intolerant Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase Treated With Nilotinib

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2011.40.5217 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (35) ◽

pp. 4323-4329 ◽

Cited By ~ 65

Author(s):

Susan Branford ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Simona Soverini ◽

Ariful Haque ◽

Yaping Shou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Close Monitoring ◽

Event Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Transcript Levels ◽

Imatinib Resistant

Purpose The association between initial molecular response and longer-term outcomes with nilotinib was examined. Patients and Methods Patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase from the phase II nilotinib registration study with available postbaseline BCR-ABL1 transcript assessments were included (N = 237). Results BCR-ABL1 transcript levels (International Scale [IS]) at 3 months correlated with complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 24 months. Patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) of > 1% to ≤ 10% at 3 months with nilotinib had higher cumulative incidence of CCyR by 24 months than patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) of > 10% (53% v 16%). BCR-ABL1 (IS) at 3 months predicted major molecular response (MMR) by 24 months. Cumulative incidence of MMR by 24 months for patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) of > 0.1% to ≤ 1%, > 1% to ≤ 10%, and > 10% was 65%, 27%, and 9%, respectively. These differences were observed for patients with or without baseline BCR–ABL1 mutations and for those with imatinib resistance or intolerance. Estimated event-free survival (EFS) rates at 24 months decreased with higher transcript levels at 3 months; patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) of ≤ 1% had an estimated 24-month EFS rate of 82%, compared with 70% for patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) of > 1% to ≤ 10% and 48% for patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) of > 10%. Conclusion Patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) of > 10% at 3 months had a lower cumulative incidence of CCyR and MMR and lower rates of EFS versus patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) of ≤ 10%. Prospective studies may determine whether close monitoring or alternative therapies are warranted for patients with minimal initial molecular response.

Download Full-text

Kinetics of the Leukemic Clone in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia during Pregnancy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115984 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4254-4254 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ekaterina Chelysheva ◽

Jane Apperley ◽

Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Konstantin Kotlyarchuk ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Late Pregnancy ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Deep Molecular Response ◽

Leukemic Clone ◽

Kinetics Of

Abstract Background Observation without treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is suggested only for patients (pts) with a durable and stable deep molecular response (DMR). However, CML women with various grade of molecular response usually stop tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for conception/pregnancy and/or breastfeeding. The kinetics of the leukemic clone during these long interruptions needs to be understood in order to provide the optimal recommendations for the pts. Aim To analyze the loss and recovery of molecular response in CML pts with initial major molecular response (MMR) and deep molecular response (DMR) who had TKI interruptions during pregnancy. Patients and methods Pregnancy cases of women with BCR-ABL p210 transcript CML chronic phase and at least MMR before TKI interruption were included; cases with insufficient follow-up and previous bone marrow transplantation were excluded. Only cases with "ongoing pregnancy" or at term for pregnancy were evaluated as they had a valid off-treatment period. Data were obtained from observational studies of CML and pregnancy, like the CML pregnancy registries of Russian hematology society, and other institutional databases. Pregnancy cases were divided into 3 groups according to the molecular response before TKI interruption: 1) with DMR and "stop" criteria; 2) with DMR and no "stop" criteria; 3) with MMR only. DMR, MMR and molecular response 2 (MR2) were considered as BCR-ABL≤0,01%; BCR-ABL>0,01% and ≤0,1%; BCR-ABL>0,1% and ≤1% accordingly by international scale (IS). "Stop" criteria were considered as the main inclusion criteria of EURO-SKI multicenter "stop" trial: 1) treatment by TKIs for ≥3 years,2) stable DMR for ≥1 year before TKI cessation. Probability of MMR loss and recovery were evaluated by Cumulative incidence function (CIF) using Gray test for comparison. TKI restart without MMR loss and death were considered as competitors. The proportion of pts with MR2 loss during TKI interruption was additionally assessed. Results In total 227 pregnancies from 172 CML pts were evaluated and 87 cases were eligible for the analysis. Distribution by groups was as follows: 39, 26 and 22 cases in group 1, 2 and 3 accordingly. Median (Me) time without TKI therapy was 8 months (mo)(range 1-54) (table 1). In 72 (83%) cases TKIs were restarted after MMR loss (n=58) and without MMR loss (n=14). TKIs were restarted after and during pregnancy in 54 and 18 cases correspondingly. Imatinib and nilotinib were used at late pregnancy (2nd-3rd trimester) in 15 and 3 cases; no birth defects were observed. Seven pts got IFN during TKI interruption. TKIs were not restarted in 15 (17%) cases: 14 pts with DMR remained off-treatment after labour for a median of 29 mo (range 3-54) and in 1 pt with MMR loss pregnancy is ongoing. Cumulative incidence (CI) of MMR loss at 6 and 12 mo after TKI cessation was 57% and 66%, and CI of MMR recovery at 6 and 12 mo after TKI restart was 50% and 75% in the whole cohort. CI of MMR loss at 6 and 12 mo was 35%, 65%, 86% and 46%, 76%, 86% in group 1,2 and 3 accordingly. CI of MMR recovery at 6 and 12 mo was 75%, 55%, 23% and 100%, 73% and 55% in group 1,2 and 3, respectively. CI of MMR recovery in group 2 and 3 at 24 mo after TKI restart was 86% and 78%. Significant differences (p<0,05%) were found between all groups for MMR loss and MMR recovery except the MMR recovery rates between groups 2 and 3 (figure 1). In 45 (52%) cases MR2 was lost simultaneously with MMR loss or after it (table 1). In 4 (5%) cases a complete hematologic response (CHR) was lost after MR2 loss; however, a MMR was regained in 2 of 4 pts. Two more pts with MR2 and CHR loss died later from progression of CML: 6 mo and approximately 8 years after labour. Both of them were non-compliant to therapy and stopped treatment again by self-made decisions with no control follow-up. Conclusions CML pts with DMR and "stop" criteria have the best chance to keep MMR during pregnancy after TKI cessation and may remain without treatment after labour. MMR is lost in the majority of pts with MMR/DMR and no "stop" criteria. However, the loss of response is reversible and MMR can be recovered within 1-2 years after TKI resuming in spite of even MR2 loss. Our data confirm the option for planning pregnancy not only in CML pts with stable DMR but also in pts who have a MMR only or non-stable DMR followed up by a careful molecular monitoring during and after pregnancy. The use of TKI during at late pregnancy will be discussed. Disclosures Chelysheva: Novartis: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures; Fusion Pharma: Other: provided consultations . Apperley:Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Abruzzese:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Kim:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Ilyang: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Shukhov:Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures ; Novartis: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures . Turkina:Novartis: Other: provided consultations; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: provided consultations; Phizer: Other: provided consultations; Fusion Pharma: Other: provided consultations.

Download Full-text

Correlation of Lymphocyte Count with Treatment Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4538.4538 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4538-4538

Author(s):

Koji Sasaki ◽

Ildefonso Ismael Rodriguez-Rivera ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Susan O'Brien ◽

Elias Jabbour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Lymphocyte Count ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Background: Total lymphocyte count (TLC) has been shown to correlate with outcomes in patients (pts) with acute leukemia. The clinical correlation to TLC in pts with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who were treated with a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) is unclear. Methods: Lymphocyte data in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP who were enrolled in consecutive or parallel clinical trials with front-line imatinib (IM), nilotinib (Nilo), or dasatinib (Dasa) were collected at the time of diagnosis, and 3 and 6 months (M) after the start of TKI. Relative lymphocytrosis (RLC) was defined as lymphocyte >150% at 3 or 6M compared with baseline at diagnosis. Absolute lymphocytosis (ALC) was defined as lymphocyte > 4,000 /µL at 3 or 6M after the start of TKI. Pts were assessed for response, overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), transformation-free survival (TFS), and failure-free survival (FFS) based on ALC and RLC. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate OS, EFS, TFS, and FFS. A log-rank test and Cox regression were used for univariate (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA), respectively. Results: A total of 483 pts were enrolled in this study: 271 in IM, 105 in Nilo, and 107 in Dasa. Patient characteristics and outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years, and median follow-up was 85M and ongoing (5-154+). Time from diagnosis to start of TKI, Sokal risk score, and ALC at baseline between groups did not differ clinically. Of 481 pts, 93 (19%) developed RLC at 3 or 6M; IM, 38 (14%); Nilo, 23 (22%); Dasa, 32 (30%) (p= .001). ALC at 3 or 6M was observed in 15 (3%); IM, 3 (1%); Nilo, 1 (1%); Dasa, 11 (10%) (p<.001). Overall, cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 6M, major molecular response (MMR) at 12M, molecular response with 4.5 log reduction by IS (MR4.5) at 24M did not differ significantly between RLC and non-RLC (3 or 6M), or between ALC and non-ALC (3 or 6M). 5-y TFS, EFS and OS in ALC group were significantly worse than those in non-ALC group (p= .002, p=.016, p=.008, respectively). By UVA and MVA related to OS, age [p <.001; Hazard ratio (HR), 1.062; 95% confidence interval (95%CI), 1.036-1.089], presence of ALC at 3 or 6M [p = .028; HR, 10.948; 95%CI, 1.297-92.415], absence of MMR at 24M [p=.016; HR, 2.263; 95%CI, 1.165-4.393] were identified as adverse prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion: The presence of ALC ≥4,000/µL at 3 or 6M of TKI therapies is rare but is adversely associated with overall survival. Table 1. Patient Characteristics and Outcomes (N=483)a Overall [n= 481] IM [n= 271] Nilo [n= 105] Dasa [n= 107] Age, (year) 48 (15-85) 48 (15-85) 49 (17-82) 48 (16-83) Sokal Risk, No. (%) Low 334 (69) 175 (65) 79 (75) 80 (75) Intermediate 114 (24) 74 (27) 18 (17) 22 (21) High 32 (7) 20 (7) 8 (8) 4 (4) Time from diagnosis to start of TKI, (M) 0.9 (0-12.6) 1.0 (0-12.6) 0.5 (0-5.6) 0.7 (0.1-7.8) ALC at baseline, (/109L) 2.5 (0-86.6) 2.4 (0-16.7) 2.6 (0.4-9.2) 2.7 (0.3-86.6) Incidence of Relative Lymphocytosis, No. (%) At 3M 65 (14) 25 (9) 16 (15) 24 (22) At 6M 76 (16) 32 (12) 20 (19) 24 (22) Overall 93 (19) 38 (14) 23 (22) 32 (30) Incidence of Absolute Lymphocytosis, No. (%) At 3M 8 (2) 1 (0) 0 7 (7) At 6M 11 (2) 3 (1) 1 (1) 7 (7) Overall 15 (3) 3 (1) 1 (1) 11 (10) Outcomes of RLC and ALC at any time in each group, +/- (%/%) (p) <10% BCR-ABL/ABL at 3M RLC 36/40 (.596) 22/44 (.213) 50/37 (.280) 31/38 (.537) ALC 38/39 (.952) 0/42 (.394) 100/39 (.214) 36/35 (.952) Cumulative CCyR at 6M RLC 75/75 (.288) 50/66 (.063) 96/90 (.413) 90/87 (.628) ALC 67/75 (.711) 33/64 (.276) 0/92 (.001) 82/89 (.599) Cumulative MMR at 12M RLC 67/74 (.406) 53/70 (.030) 83/82 (.921) 72/74 (.903) ALC 60/73 (.488) 33/68 (.197) 0/83 (.033) 73/74 (.745) Cumulative MR4.5 at 24M RLC 46/52 (.564) 37/50 (.139) 57/55 (.889) 50/57 (.729) ALC 33/52 (.332) 33/48 (.610) 0/56 (.264) 36/57 (.252) 5-y FFS RLC 61/71 (.133) 56/69 (.167) 62/70 (.710) 61/74 (.285) ALC 50/69 (.076) 0/68 (<.001) 0/70 (<.001) 71/70 (.974) 5-y TFS RLC 90/93 (.369) 88/93 (.597) 91/88 (.115) 91/99 (.213) ALC 72/93 (.002) 67/93 (.014) 0/90 (<.001) 80/97 (.121) 5-y EFS RLC 80/86 (.213) 71/83 (.154) 84/87 (.450) 86/93 (.486) ALC 64/85 (.016) 33/82 (<.001) 0/87 (<.001) 80/92 (.574) 5-y OS RLC 89/93 (.068) 81/94 (.007) 100/84 (.126) 96/99 (.207) ALC 82/93 (.008) 67/93 (.001) 100/88 (.847) 83/99 (.040) a Two in IM and 1 in Dasa were not evaluable due to lack of differential data at 3 and 6M. Figure 1. OS in Pts with ALC Figure 1. OS in Pts with ALC Disclosures O'Brien: Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Cessation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Treatment in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Deep Molecular Response: Results of the Euro-Ski Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.787.787 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 787-787 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Francois-xavier Mahon ◽

Johan Richter ◽

Joelle Guilhot ◽

Henrik Hjorth-Hansen ◽

Antonio Almeida ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

P Value ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Free Survival ◽

Tki Treatment

Abstract Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have dramatically improved survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with a high proportion of patients reaching deep molecular responses (DMR). The effectiveness of stopping TKI treatment is a key question regarding the management of CML. Actually, in several studies, it has been proven that a substantial part of patients in DMR can safely and successfully stop TKI therapy. However, the exact preconditions for stopping CML treatments are not yet defined. This is the aim of the European stop TKI (EURO-SKI) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: NCT01596114). Methods: Chronic phase CML patients without prior TKI failure, treated with either imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib, in DMR (BCR-ABL <0.01% on the international scale, MR4) for the duration of at least one year were proposed to stop TKI treatment. Molecular recurrence (MR) was defined by the loss of the major molecular response (MMR, BCR-ABL <0.1% IS) at any one point. We estimated molecular recurrence-free survival (MRFS) with the Kaplan-Meier method. The potential prognostic values for MR were tested by univariate and multivariable analyses and the cut-off was identified with the minimal p-value approach. Results: From June 2012 to December 2014, 821 CP CML patients were included in 11 European countries belonging to the European Leukemia Net (ELN). 750 patients had assessable molecular data (European standardization according to Cross et al, Leukemia 2012) for the estimation of MRFS. Of these patients, 348 lost MMR and 5 died in remission ; MRFS was 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59% - 67%) at 6 months (m), 56% (CI: 52% - 59%) at 12 m and 52% (CI: 48% - 56%) at 24 m on an "Intention to Treat Basis ". At the time of evaluation most patients regained DMR, and importantly, no progression to advanced disease phase was noted. A prognostic modelling was performed based on 448 patients treated with imatinib. Univariate analysis showed no significant association between age, gender, depth of molecular response (MR4.5 vs. no MR4.5) or any variable part of the Sokal, EURO, EUTOS, or ELTS scores and MMR status at 6 months after treatment stop. Treatment duration with imatinib and MR4duration prior to the stop were significantly (p<0.001) correlated with MMR status at 6 months. The odds ratio for treatment duration was 1.16 (95%-CI: 1.08-1.25), meaning that one additional year of treatment increases the odds to stay in MMR at 6 months by 16%. Molecular relapse-free survival at 6 months was 65.5% for imatinib treatment > 5.8 years and 42.6% for treatment ≤ 5.8 years. This cut-off was identified with the minimal p-value approach. A true pharmaco-economic study will be necessary but taking into account the number of months without treatment in 603 patients, Imatinib front line (with a median observation time of 24 m for patients still off treatment) and the cost of imatinib in each of the 11 European countries (range: 1.734-3.370 Euro per month) the total estimated savings amounted to 27.85 million Euro. Conclusion: Using standardized molecular monitoring, stopping TKI therapy in a very large cohort of CML-patients appears feasible and safe and high MRFS rates are achievable. Longer duration of imatinib-therapy (optimal ≥ 5.8 years) prior to TKI-stop is associated with a higher probability of MRFS. Taking into account the long follow-up without molecular relapse in the historical studies such as STIM1 (Etienne et al; JCO 2016) the "operational" cure of CML with oral TKI is an up-to-date issue. Disclosures Mahon: NOVARTIS PHARMA: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria; ARIAD: Honoraria. Richter:Ariad: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Almeida:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Berger:NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria. Machova Polakova:Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Mustjoki:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Saussele:NOVARTIS PHARMA: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

The Outcome of Unselected Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) In Chronic Phase (CP) Treated with Imatinib In the First Line and the Prognostic Value of ELN Defined Responses – Population Based Analysis of 458 Patients Treated Between 2003–2009.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1239.1239 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1239-1239 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hana Klamova ◽

Daniela Zackova ◽

Edgar Faber ◽

Katerina Steinerova ◽

Michal Karas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Treatment Response ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Response Evaluation ◽

Free Survival ◽

Optimal Response

Abstract Abstract 1239 Background. Imatinib (IM), a selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is a treatment of choice for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts) in chronic phase (CP) as it was shown in the IRIS trial. The treatment strategy and response evaluation is based on NCCN or ELN guidelines. Only limited “real life” data of IM impact on pts outcome as well as ELN (European LeukemiaNet) recommendations applicability in daily practice has been published. In the Czech as well as in the Slovak Republic (15 million inhabitants), the treatment of CML patients is centralized in overall 13 centers, capable carrying on both the treatment and laboratory monitoring. There are two CML prospective projects CAMELIA and INFINITY focused on CML pts analysis. Aims. To analyze the treatment response and long-term outcome in consecutive, unselected patients with CP-CML treated with IM and to evaluate the prognostic role of ELN 2006 and 2009 response evaluation. To analyze molecular response in more detail. Methods. Altogether 458 consecutively included patients in INFINITY (152 pts) and CAMELIA projects (306 pts) were assessed. For the treatment response evaluation the ELN 2006 and ELN 2009 definitions were used. We assessed rates and the cumulative incidences of complete hematologic responses (CHR), complete cytogenetic responses (CCyR), major (MMoR) and complete molecular responses (CMoR). Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the start of IM to death from any cause, overall survival CML-related death (OSCML), transformation-free survival (TFS) as survival without evidence of AP or BP or death from any cause, progression-free survival (PFS) as survival without evidence of AP or BP, loss of CHR, MCyR, increasing white blood cell count or death fron any cause while on IM treatment and event-free survival (EFS) –events defined as a progression (the same as in PFS, as described above), loss of CCyR, failure to achieve CHR at 6 months, MCyR at 12 months and CCyR at 18 months, or intolerance of IM as the cause its discontinution. The patient survival according to MMoR achievement and the cumulative incidence of MMoR according to different BCR-ABL ratio within the first 3 months of IM therapy was analysed. Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence methods and log rank test were used for survival statistic analysis. Results. A total of 458 patients (median age 52 year;17-81) treated with IM between 2003–2009 were analysed.The median follow-up was 33.1 months (1.4-82.1). At 2 and 4 years the cumulative incidence of CHR was 90.9% and 94.7%, CCyR 64.9% and 76%, MMR 52.4% and 68.1% and CMR 24.5% and 43%, respectively. In 4 years estimated OS was 91.1%, OSCML 96.6%, TFS 93.9%, PFS 83.2% and EFS 66%. According to ELN 2006 criteria the optimal response (OR) by 6 months (defined as PCyR) and by 12 months (defined as CCyR) resp. had significant impact on PFS (p=0.04 and p<0.001 resp.). The optimal reponse by 3 months (defined as CHR) had significant impact on TFS (p<0.001). According to actualized criteria in ELN 2009, the new definition of optimal response in the 3rd month - at least minor cytogenetic response (mCyR), did not show any prognostic impact on PFS. The achievement of MMoR was correlated with the significant improvement in PFS in the 3rd month (p=0.039) as well as in the 12th month (p<0.049). There was significant improvement in EFS for patients in MMoR in all timepoints (p<0.003, <0.001, <0.001, <0.005). The BCR-ABL ratio lower than 1% within the first 3 months was associated with MMoR achievement in higher number of patients in comparison to patients with higher BCR-ABL levels (p<0.001) Conclusion. The excellent and long-lasting efficacy of imatinib in the treatment of CP-CML in non-selected group of patients treated in the defined region was confirmed. Our results are comparable to those achieved in IRIS trial. Response criteria and their predictive role defined by ELN 2006 and 2009 seems to be helpful at some time points, but the ELN 2009 modification does not seem to represent significant improvement compared to ELN 2006. On the other hand based on the present analysis the earlier incorporation of molecular response into the evaluation scheme may be beneficial. Supported by: CELL-The Czech Leukemia Study Group for Life, Project INFINITY; Project CAMELIA. Disclosures: Faber: BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

BCR-ABL Fusion Transcript Do Not Significantly Influence the Outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients In Early Chronic Phase Treated with Imatinib Mesylate: a GIMEMA CML WP Analysis.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1230.1230 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1230-1230

Author(s):

Fausto Castagnetti ◽

Gabriele Gugliotta ◽

Francesca Palandri ◽

Massimo Breccia ◽

Giorgina Specchia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Fusion Transcript ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 1230 Background: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the presence of the BCR-ABL fusion gene. Different types of BCR-ABL transcripts can be found, due to different genomic breakpoints and alternative splicing. The most frequent transcripts are the e13a2 (b2a2) and the e14a2 (b3a2), that codify for a p210 protein. Occasionally, both transcripts may be present. In the imatinib (IM) era, few data about the prognostic significance of the transcript type are available, particularly in the setting of early chronic phase (ECP): one study suggested that patients with the b2a2 transcript may be more sensitive to IM (de Lemos et al. Genet Mol Res 2005), while two larger studies suggested that patients with b3a2 transcript may have better responses to IM (Vega-Ruiz et al. ASH 2007; Lucas et al. Haematologica 2009). No systematic evaluations in the context of large prospective clinical trials have been performed. AIM: To investigate the influence of the type of BCR-ABL fusion transcript on the responses and the outcome of CML patients treated with IM in ECP. Methods: We performed an analysis of 3 concurrent clinical trials of the GIMEMA CML Working Party (Clin Trials Gov. NCT00514488, NCT00510926 and the observational trial CML/023). Response monitoring was based on conventional cytogenetic examination (bone marrow) and quantitative molecular (Q-PCR) evaluation (peripheral blood). Definitions: Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCgR): 0% Ph+; Major Molecular Response (MMR): BCR-ABL/ABL ratio <0.1% (International Scale); failures: according to the revised European LeukemiaNet criteria (Baccarani et al. J Clin Oncol 2009). Results: 559 consecutive CML patients in early CP have been enrolled from January, 2004 to January, 2007. Patients expressing rare transcript types (e1a2 and e19a2) and patients with the presence of both b2a2 and b3a2 transcripts were excluded: 493 out of 559 patients were evaluable, 203 (41%) with a b2a2 transcript and 290 with a b3a2 transcript (59%). The 2 groups were comparable (no significant difference in sex, age, Sokal and Hasford scores, clonal chromosomal abnormalities in Ph+ cells before IM and imatinib dose). The median observation time is currently 60 (extremes 2–80) months. In patients with b2a2 and b3a2 transcript, the observed 12-months CCgR rates were 77% and 80%, respectively; the cumulative incidence of CCgR was 89% and 88%, respectively (no significant differences). The time to MMR was significantly shorter for patients with b3a2 transcript (fig.1), but the cumulative incidence of MMR was not significantly different (81% and 86% in patients with b2a2 and b3a2 transcript, respectively). The probabilities of Failure-Free Survival, Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival were 69% and 75%, 83% and 89%, 87% and 92% in patients with b2a2 and b3a2 transcript, respectively (fig. 1); no difference was statistically significant. Conclusions: In our experience, based on 493 early CP CML patients treated frontline with IM, the type of BCR-ABL fusion transcript had no relevant prognostic impact and no outcome differences have been observed so far. Acknowledgments: Work supported by European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, University of Bologna and BolognAIL. Disclosures: Castagnetti: Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Gugliotta:Novartis: Honoraria. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Wyeth: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Switching to a Second Generation TKI in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Late Suboptimal Response with Imatinib Obtained Better Molecular Responses That the “Watch and Wait” Approach. an Experience of a Multicenter Registry in Patients Outside Clinical Trials

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3768.3768 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3768-3768

Author(s):

J Valentin Garcia-Gutierrez ◽

Begoña Maestro ◽

Luis Felipe Casado ◽

Manuel Perez-Encinas ◽

Isabel Massague ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Second Generation ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Treatment Change ◽

Molecular Responses ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

Abstract Abstract 3768 Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically changed chronic myeloid leukemia prognostic. The European Leukemia Net guidelines are widely used for patients treated with TKIs. While strategies for patients with optimal response and failure after imatinib are clear, there are doubts about the best treatment option for patients with suboptimal response (SubR), specially for late SubR (patients with complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) but not mayor molecular response (MMR) after 18 months of treatment). Patients with MMR seem to have better outcomes than patients with CCyR but not MMR, but at this time, there are few data showing the benefits of treatment change in this group of patients. Aims: To identify the benefits of treatment change in patients with late SubR, outside clinical trials, in the setting of a multicenter hospital-based registry. Patients and methods: We have studied retrospectively a group of 488 CML chronic phase patients treated with imatinib as first TKI, identifying 96 patients (19%) with SubR criteria (following the ELN recommendations) after 18 months of treatment. These patients have been classified according to the strategy followed by their physician after SubR identification. Group 1 includes 65 patients (67%) continuing with imatinib (either initial dose or higher dose) and group 2 includes 31patients (33%) that were changed to second generation TKI (2GTKI: dasatinib or nilotinib). Sokal risk index was high in 17% and 9%; intermediate 44 % and 41%; and low in 39% and 50 % for group 1 and 2, respectively. 31% and 30% of patients had received interferon prior to imatinib. Molecular response was analyzed after 12 months of identifying late SubR (for group 1) or after switching to 2GTKI, for group 2. Results: The use of 2G TKIs resulted in significant benefit to patients in terms of improving molecular responses. Complete molecular responses (CMR) and MMR rates were 3.8% vs 27% and 41.5% vs 69% for group 1 and 2 respectively (p=0.006). Time for the achievements the best molecular responses was significantly lower for patients receiving second generation TKI (4.1 vs 20.2 months, p=0.004). Probabilities of treatment failure, defined as loss of CCR, were also higher in patients remaining with imatinib (15.4% vs 5.7% (p=0.12). Progression free survival was 93.8% vs 97.2% (p=0.18) for group 1 and 2 respectively. Changing treatment for late SubR patients was also safe, and only 17% of patients needed to switch to another TKI due to intolerance. Conclusions: In CML patients treated with Imatinib with late SubR, and outside clinical trials, switching to second generation TKI increased probabilities of achievement a deeper molecular response, with a good safety profile. Disclosures: Casado: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Steegmann:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text