The BCR-ABL1 Transcript Type Does Not Influence the Response and the Outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated Frontline with Nilotinib

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1680-1680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Francesca Palandri ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Transcript Type

Abstract Abstract 1680 Background. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the presence of the BCR-ABL1 hybrid gene. Different types of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts can be found, but the most frequent are the e13a2 (b2a2) and the e14a2 (b3a2). In the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) era, few data about the prognostic significance of the transcript type in early chronic phase (ECP) CML are available. Three larger studies suggested that the e13a2 transcript may have an adverse prognostic impact in ECP CML patients treated with imatinib (IM): Vega-Ruiz et al. (251 patients, ASH 2007) reported inferior molecular responses; Lucas et al. (71 patients, Haematologica 2009) reported lower cytogenetic response rates and lower event-free survival (EFS); the GIMEMA CML WP (493 patients, EHA 2011) reported a slower time to major molecular response (MMR) with inferior EFS and progression-free survival (PFS). To our knowledge this is the first evaluation of the prognostic influence of the BCR-ABL1 transcript type on the responses and the outcome of ECP CML treated frontline with nilotinib (NIL). Methods. The CML Italian Registry of Nilotinib includes 215 patients treated with NIL-based regimens. The patients were enrolled within 2 multicenter phase II studies conducted by the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT00481052 and NCT00769327) or treated at the “S. Orsola-Malpighi” University Hospital (Bologna, Italy), with NIL 300 mg BID or 400 mg BID as initial treatment. All the registered patients were analyzed. Patients expressing rare transcripts and patients with both b2a2 and b3a2 transcripts were excluded: 201 out of 215 patients were evaluable, 81 (40%) with e13a2 transcript and 120 (60%) with e14a2 transcript. Differences between groups were tested using χ2 test, Fisher exact test or t-test, as appropriate. Response monitoring: conventional cytogenetic examination (bone marrow) and QPCR (peripheral blood). Definitions: MMR: BCR-ABLIS ratio <0.1% (International Scale); failures: according to 2009 ELN recommendations; events: failure or treatment discontinuation for any reason. The time-to-response and the outcome were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared by log-rank test. Results. The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable (no significant differences in age, Sokal/Hasford/EUTOS score distribution, clonal chromosomal abnormalities in Ph+ cells, NIL dose), except for the percentage of basophils in the peripheral blood, higher in patients with e14a2 transcript (3.4% vs 2.3%, p=0.01). The median observation was 29 months (range 18–47); 92% of the patients had at least 2 year observation. The CCgR and MMR rates at 12 months were comparable in the 2 groups. The time to MMR was longer for patients with e13a2 transcript (6 months vs 3 months, p=0.04), but the overall CCgR rates (93.8 vs 91.7, p=0.79) and the overall MMR rates (85.1 vs 90.0, p=0.38) were not significantly different in patients with e13a2 or e14a2 transcript, respectively. The probability of Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Failure-Free Survival (FFS) were comparable: 91.4% vs 95.8% (p=0.61), 90.7% vs 95.0% (p=0.51), and 90.7% vs 88.7% (p=0.40) in patients with e13a2 and e14a2 transcript, respectively. Conclusions. In our experience, based on 201 early CP CML patients treated frontline with NIL with a minimum follow-up of 18 months, the BCR-ABL transcript type did not show any relevant prognostic impact. The time to MMR was longer in patients with e13a2 transcript, but no response and outcome differences have been observed so far. The number of observed events was low and a longer observation is required. Acknowledgments. European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, Bologna University, BolognAIL Disclosures: Castagnetti: Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gugliotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Cavazzini:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Turri:Novartis: Consultancy, Novartis Other; Bristol Myers Squibb: Bristol Myers Squibb, Bristol Myers Squibb Other, Consultancy. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rosti:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals R-Interferon Treatment before Imatinib Reverses the Negative Impact of e13a2 Transcript Type on Treatment Free Remission Duration after Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Discontinuation in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4146-4146
Author(s):  
Mariella D'Adda ◽  
Mirko Farina ◽  
Angela Passi ◽  
Rosa Daffini ◽  
Doriana Gramegna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Tki Discontinuation ◽  
Transcript Type

BACKGROUND Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKIs) discontinuation has become, nowadays, under proper conditions, a feasible option for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) also in "real life" setting. Different papers investigated which factors (age, sex, type of TKI, previous r-interferonα -r-INFα- therapy, line of therapy at stop, type of transcript, duration of TKI therapy and of sustained deep molecular response -sDMR-, Sokal risk score) could predict a successful TKIs discontinuation either within protocols or outside of clinical trials, and the results are not unique. AIM We retrospectively evaluated our CML pts who stopped TKI after sDMR in order to assess the variables that could influence the probability of a durable TFR. METHODS BCR-ABL transcripts were determined by RQ-PCR performed according to EAC protocol (Gabert et al, 2003) and to the standards of the Italian National Network Labnet. Criteria for TKI discontinuation was sustained DMR (MR4 or better) for at least 2 years. After TKI withdrawal, RQ-PCR for BCR-ABL was performed every month during the first year and every 2 months thereafter. TKI treatment was reintroduced if DMR loss occurred.TFR was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method; potential prognostic factors were considered for multivariable analyses at a level less than .20. RESULTS Between October 2010 and January 2019, 68 patients discontinued TKIs, 18 of them after less than 5 years of treatment because of pregnancy desire (3), intolerance (6), patient's desire/non compliance (5), enrollment in study protocols (4). At discontinuation median age was 63 years (30-85), median time from TKI start 85 months (30-190), median duration of sustained DMR 48 months (24-153). Sokal distribution was 48%, 31% and 18% for low, intermediate and high risk respectively (2 patient was not evaluable). E14a2 transcript type was present in 52 pts and e13a2 in 16 pts. Thirty-eight patients stopped imatinib, 25 nilotinib (19 in 1st line, 6 in 2nd line), 5 dasatinib. Before imatinib 15 patients received r-IFNα, for a median time of 60 months (3-256). Median follow up after TKI stop was 39 months (5-105, >24 in 61, <12 in only 2 patients). Twenty-eight (41%) patients lost DMR. Median time off-therapy for these patients was 3 months (1-19), only 2 lost DMR after 6 months (at +16 and +19 months). One patient aged 87 years has not yet resumed therapy but remains in stable MR3 at 34 months after TKI discontinuation. Therapy was restarted in 27 patients (1 in MR1, 11 in MR2, 15 in MR3), 24 achieved a second DMR after a median interval of 2 months (1-18); 3/27 patients are in M3 after 2, 22 and 26 months. Neither cytogenetic relapses, nor progressions were documented. One patient died in DMR for pancreatic cancer. Univariate analysis showed no difference in relapse risk according to age, gender, type of TKI (imatinib vs 2nd generation TKIs), and Sokal score, while the e14a2 vs e13a2 transcript type (p = 0.011), duration of TKI therapy > 60 months (p = 0.025) and previous r-IFNα therapy (p=0.021) were significantly linked to better outcome after TKI discontinuation; sDMR > 72 months is very close to be a significant variable (p=0.055). At multivariate analysis only the type of BCR-ABL transcript (p=0.027) and previous r-IFNα ( p=0.016) remained independent significant prognostic factors -figure A and figure B-. CONCLUSION e14a2 transcript type was confirmed as a robust favorable prognostic factor for TFR maintenance. In our experience, 2GTKIs didn't impact favorably TFR duration after TKIs discontinuation, conversely r-IFNα treatment before TKI improved the probability of maintaining DMR after TKI withdrawal, particularly in e13a2 patients. In fact r-IFNα before imatinib reversed the negative prognostic impact on TFR maintenance of the e13a2 transcript type. Disclosures D'Adda: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rossi:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of BCR-ABL1 Transcript Type in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated Frontline with Nilotinib

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3070-3070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
Mariella D'Adda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Transcript Type

Abstract Background. The fusion protein encoded by the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene may differ in size, but the great majority of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients have a e13a2 (b2a2) or a e14a2 (b3a2) junction. In CML patients treated frontline with imatinib, the e14a2 transcript has been recently associated to faster and deeper molecular responses; in some studies a better outcome has been also reported. Very limited information on the prognostic impact of the BCR-ABL1 transcript type in CML patients treated frontline with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is still available: a study from MDACC reported lower molecular response rates and a trend for inferior event-free survival in e13a2 patients. Aim. To evaluate if the BCR-ABL1 transcript type (e14a2 vs e13a2) affect the response and the clinical outcome in newly diagnosed adult CML patients treated frontline with nilotinib (NIL). Methods. An analysis of 345 CML patients in early chronic phase (ECP) enrolled within 3 multicentric prospective studies of the GIMEMA CML Working Party (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00481052, NCT00769327, NCT01535391) was performed. The initial treatment was NIL 300 mg BID or NIL 400 mg BID. Definitions: major molecular response (MMR), BCR-ABL1IS ratio < 0.1%; deep molecular response (MR4.0), BCR-ABL1IS ratio < 0.01% with > 10,000 ABL1 copies; progression, transformation to advanced phases; death, at any time and for any reason. Cumulative incidences of response were estimated under consideration of competing risks (progression, death) and compared by Gray test. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Results. Seven patients expressing rare transcripts (e1a2 or e19a2) and 10 patients with unknown transcript type were excluded: 328 out of 345 patients were evaluable, 124 (38%) with e13a2 transcript, 174 (53%) with e14a2 transcript and 30 (9%) expressing both transcripts. The baseline characteristics of patients with e13a2 or e14a2 transcripts were comparable: no significant differences in age, gender, Sokal or EUTOS long-term survival score distribution, presence of clonal chromosomal abnormalities in Ph+ cells, NIL dose were observed; the only difference was a higher platelet count in patients with e14a2 transcript (median 374 vs 313 x 103/µl, p=0.006). The median follow-up was 60 months in both groups (range 24-82 months). The response rates and the survival probabilities were uniformly lower in patients with e13a2 transcript (N=124) compared to patients with e14a2 transcript (N=174), but the differences were not significant: MMR by 12 months, 66% vs 72%, p=0.244; MR4.0 by 36 months, 56% vs 66%, p=0.067; estimated cumulative incidence of MMR, 82% vs 88%, p=0.135; estimated cumulative incidence of MR4.0, 60% vs 69%, p=0.101; estimated PFS, 88% vs 93%, p=0.547; estimated OS, 89% vs 94%, p=0.436 (Figure 1). The responses and the survival probabilities of patients co-expressing the e13a2 and the e14a2 transcripts (N=30) were similar to or even better than the ones of e14a2 patients. Grouping together the patients with e14a2 transcript alone and the patients with co-expression of both transcripts (N=174+30=204), and comparing them to patients with e13a2 transcript alone (N=124), the response differences became significant (cumulative incidence of MMR and MR4.0, p=0.050 and p=0.036, respectively), but no outcome differences emerged (PFS and OS, p=0.340 and p=0.276, respectively). Conclusions. Despite a trend for lower response rates and inferior outcome in patients with e13a2 transcript, the observed differences were small and mostly not significant. Further studies in larger patient cohorts are required to clarify whether nilotinib and other second generation TKIs are able to overcome the adverse prognostic impact of transcript type, potentially affecting the speed and the depth of molecular response, the probability of achieving a treatment-free remission and the patient outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Castagnetti: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gugliotta:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Ariad: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Carella:Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Tiribelli:Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bocchia:Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Soverini:Ariad: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Cavo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Martinelli:ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Rosti:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals First-Line Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Newly Diagnosed Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 48-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Balsat ◽  
Vincent Alcazer ◽  
Gabriel Etienne ◽  
Gaelle Fossard ◽  
Francoise Huguet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Introduction Up to 10% of patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are already in accelerated phase (AP) at diagnosis and despite treatment advances in the field of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), management of these pts is challenging. This study aims to examine the benefit of second generation BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI2) as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed AP-CML. Methods Pts meeting criteria for AP-CML at diagnosis and treated with first-line TKI2 (i. e. Nilotinib or Dasatinib) were included in this retrospective multicenter observational national study. AP-CML were defined according to the ELN (Baccarani, Blood 2013) as hematological acceleration (HEM-AP, any of the following features: blasts in PB or marrow 15-29%, or blasts+promyelocytes in PB or marrow >30% with blasts <30%, basophils in PB ≥20%, or persistent thrombocytopenia <100×109/L (unrelated to therapy) and/or chromosomal abnormalities in addition to the Ph at diagnosis (ACA-AP). Pts initiated nilotinib at 6-800 mg BID or dasatinib at 100-140 mg QD with further dose adaptations according to toxicities or response. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and failure-free survival [FFS= progression to blast crisis, death, loss of any previous response (CHR, CCyR, or MMR) discontinuation of TKI2 for toxicity], were analysed since TKI2 initiation in intention-to-treat. Results Sixty-six pts were analysed: 45 males (68%) and 21 females (32%) with a median age at diagnosis of 49 (15-78.5) years. The median follow-up of the cohort was 43.5 (1.7-117) months. We segregated the pts in HEM-AP (n=33) and ACA-AP (n=33) for further analyses. Nine pts with HEM-AP harboured ACA and were analysed in the HEM-AP group. Fusion transcripts were of the Major BCR in 57 pts, 6 pts had atypical BCR-ABL transcripts (2 e19a2, and 1 e1a2 in the HEM-AP group and 2 e19a2 and 1 Ma3 in the ACA-AP group), and 3 transcripts unknown. Not surprisingly, spleen enlargement was significantly greater in the HEM-AP group [10 (5-14.75) vs. 3 (0-10)cm, p=0.014]. PB basophils [median 10 (6-16) vs. 3 (2-5)%, p <0.001], PB blasts [median: 12.05 (7.5-15) vs. 1.5 (0-4)%, p<.001], as well as PB blasts+promyelocytes [median 14 (11-20) vs. 4 (1-7)%, p<.001]. Hemoglobin levels were significantly lower in the HEM-AP group [median 93 (6-113.5) vs 120 (100-134) g/L, p<0.001]. Neither WBC counts, platelets counts, nor BCR-ABL/ABL load differed significantly between the 2 groups. In the ACA-AP group, 10 (30%) pts harbored major route ACA and 23 (70%) pts harbored minor route ACA of whom 3 pts with i(17q) and 1 with 7q abnormalities. In the ACA-AP group, Sokal score was low in 42%, intermediate in 32% and high in 26% of pts (2 pts unknown). Dasatinib was initiated in 19/33 pts (57.5%) in the HEM-AP group and in 8/33 pts (24%) in the ACA-AP group. Treatment responses did not significantly differ between ACA-AP and HEM-AP group, regardless of the TKI2 administered, with 33/33 (100%) vs 31/33 (94%) pts achieving a CHR, 2/33 (6%) pts vs 0/33 (0%) pts achieving a MCyR, 5/33 (15%) pts vs 5/33 (15%) pts achieving CCyR, 9/33 (27%) pts vs 4/33 (12%) pts achieving a MMR respectively. However, 11/33 (33%) HEM-AP vs 22/33 (66%) ACA-AP pts achieved a deep molecular response (p=0.013, Fisher test). Median times to CHR and MMR were not significantly different between ACA-AP group and HEM-AP group with 1.05 vs 1.25 months (p=0.088) for CHR and 6 vs 7 months (p=0.156) for MMR, respectively. Overall, the estimated 7-yr FFS rate was 56.92% (95%CI: 40-81), 7-yr PFS was 83.42% (95% CI: 69.6-100%) and 7-yr OS was 87.14% (95%CI: 73.5-100%) (Figure 1.) with no significant differences between ACA-AP vs HEM-AP pts [7-yr FFS: 57.7 vs. 62%, p=0.739; 7-yr PFS: 84.7% vs. 84%, p=0.185; 7-yr OS: 88.9% vs 86.6%, p=0.132] respectively. There was also no difference in FFS, PFS and OS according to the type of TKI2. The only factors influencing negatively OS were the % of BM blasts (HR=1.17, 95%CI: 1.1-1.28, p<0.001) and the % of BM blasts+promyelocytes (HR=1.14, 95%CI: 1.06-1.22, p<0.001). We identified too few significant factors in univariate analysis to perform a multivariate analysis. Conclusion The initiation of a TKI2 in newly diagnosed AP-CML pts induces excellent response and survival rates, probably superior to that of Imatinib first-line, and counterbalances the negative impact of this advanced disease, particularly in HEM AP subgroup. Disclosures Etienne: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Speakers Bureau. Berger:Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mahon:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Nicolini:BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy.

Real World Efficacy Evaluation of Branded and Copy Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Multicentric Study from Argentina

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Ana Ines Varela ◽  
Georgina Bendek ◽  
Carolina Pavlovsky ◽  
Maria Josefina Freitas ◽  
Veronica Ventriglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Sokal Score

Background: Data on the safety and efficacy of copy drugs is usually unavailable. Imatinib mesylate is used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in Argentina since 2002. During the last decade more than ten different imatinib copies are marketed by the different health-care systems in the country, usually for cost issues. In spite of the undoubted benefit of this tyrosine-kinase inhibitor indication in CML, there is no solid evidence that supports copy drug equivalent outcomes for this patient population. Aim: To compare the clinical presentation, treatment response and outcome of a chronic phase (CP) CML patient cohort treated with branded and copy imatinib in the real-life setting. Methods: Multicentric, retrospective trial based on data obtained from medical charts of adult CP CML patients treated with imatinib in 9 centers in Argentina from 2002 to 2020.We analyzed demographic characteristics and clinical characteristics described for branded and copy imatinib treated cohorts. Frequency of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 12 months, Major molecular response or better(≥MMR) at 12, 18 and 24 months and overall MR4.0, MR4.5 and deep molecular response (MR4.0 +MR4.5 IS) were analyzed. Event was defined as failure, progression or CML related death. Kaplan Meier comparison of event free, progression free and overall survival. Statistics: IBM SPSS version 1. Results: A total of 568 CP CML adult patients (pt) treated with imatinib were included. Mean age at diagnosis: 45.7 years (range 18 - 85). Male 55.6% (316/568). Sokal Score was recorded in 471 pt: 57% (269/471) low, 26% (122/471) intermediate and 17% (80/471) high-risk. Median follow-up 107 months (RIQ: 36-149). Branded imatinib treatment 330 (58%) and imatinib copies 238 (42%). For branded and copy imatinib cohorts mean age 46,1 (18-85) and 45.3(18-80), male 53% (175/330) and 59% (141/238), median follow up 102 (RIQ 101-130) and 61 (RIQ 62-146) respectively. Sokal score low 58% (164/284) and 56% (105/187), intermediate 27% (77/284) and 24% (45/187) and high 15% (43/284) and19% (37/187). Frequency of CCyR at 12 months 71% (67/94) and 69% (41/59), ≥MMR at 12 months 57% (79/138) and 43% (39/89), ≥MMR 18m 66 % (61/92) and 71% (43/60), ≥MMR 24m 65% (96/147) and 79% (58/73). Overall MR4, MR 4.5 and Deep MR with branded imatinib 62.4% (186/298), 42% (118/276) and 63% (189/300), compared to 45(97/214), 24% (50/207) and 46% (99/215) with copies. Difference in evaluation throughout the treatment periods with loss of data did not allow response rate statistical comparison in predetermined timepoints. Kaplan Meier Event free survival median 229 months vs 75 months p 0.001, Progression free survival mean 318 months vs 208 pt 0.034 and Overall Survival mean 275 months vs 206 months for branded and copy imatinib respectively. Discussion: Several case reports have shown poor outcomes in patients treated with imatinib copy drugs, including loss of responses previously attained with branded imatinib. This study reports data from a large cohort of CP CML patients treated in daily practice during a long period of time. Treatment results at determined timepoints is comparable. Although management and treatment decisions were performed in different time periods, results show different outcomes in EFS and PFS between patients treated with branded vs copy imatinib. Overall survival in both cohorts is comparable. As studies assesing the safety and efficacy of the copy drugs compared with branded imatinib will hardly be performed this evidence calls for careful attention and strict follow up measures when managing CML patients with copy imatinib. Figure Disclosures Varela: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Pavlovsky:Pint Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Freitas:Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board. Pavlovsky:Varifarma: Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau. Moiraghi:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau.

Prediction of Response to Imatinib by Prospective Quantitation of BCR-ABL Transcript in Late Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia PatientsBy GIMEMA Working Party on CML.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4672-4672
Author(s):  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
Fabrizio Pane ◽  
Marilina Amabile ◽  
Simona Bassi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prediction Of Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Blood Samples

Abstract Imatinib mesylate (STI571), a specific Bcr-Abl inhibitor, has shown a potent antileukemic activity in clinical studies of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Early prediction of response to imatinib cannot be anticipated. We used a standardized quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) for bcr-abl transcripts on 191 out of 200 late-chronic phase CML patients enrolled in a phase II clinical trial with imatinib 400 mg/day. Bone marrow samples were collected before treatment, after 3, 6 and 12 months or at the end of study treatment (12 months) while peripheral blood samples were obtained after 2, 3, 6, 10, 14, 20 and 52 weeks of therapy. The amount of Bcr-Abl transcript was expressed as the ratio of Bcr-Abl to β2-microglobulin (β2M). We show that, following initiation of imatinib, the early Bcr-Abl level trends in both bone marrow and peripheral blood samples made it possible to predict the subsequent cytogenetic outcome after 6 and 12 months of treatment, and that these early trends were also predictive of progression-free survival.

The BCR-ABL Transcript Levels At 3 and 6 Months Predict the Long-Term Outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated Frontline with Imatinib Mesylate: A Gimema CML WP Analysis

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1678-1678
Author(s):  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Giorgina Specchia ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Transcript Levels

Abstract Abstract 1678 Background. Imatinib mesylate (IM) is the therapeutic standard for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but nilotinib and dasatinib, at least in selected patients, have the potential to replace it. The early prediction of poor outcome is important to optimize the treatment strategy. In IM-treated patients, BCR-ABL transcript levels according to the International Scale (IS) > 10% at 3 and > 1% at 6 months were able to identify high-risk groups (Marin et al, JClinOncol 2011; Hanfstein et al, Leukemia 2012). Similar analysis were performed within the IM arms of the ENESTnd trial (Hochhaus et al, EHA 2012) and the DASISION trial (Jabbour et al, EHA 2012). Methods. To investigate the prognostic impact of BCR-ABLIS levels at 3 and 6 months on the future response status and the long-term outcome of CML patients treated frontline with IM, we analyzed 559 patients enrolled within 3 trials of the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinTrialsGov NCT00514488/NCT00510926, observational trial CML023). Patients with evaluable QPCR sample at 3 and 6 months: 487/559 (87%) and 492/559 (88%), respectively. Definitions: major molecular response (MMR): BCR-ABLIS ratio <0.1%; molecular response with 4.0-log reduction (MR4.0): BCR-ABLIS <0.01%; failures: according to 2009 ELN recommendations. The rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) and MMR at 1 year, the rate of MR4.0 at 2 years, the failure-free survival (FFS), the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) according to the BCR-ABL transcript levels (≤10% vs >10 and ≤1% vs >1%) at 3 and 6 months were analyzed. Patients with events or censored within 3 or 6 months were excluded from the respective analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used for descriptive purposes. Results. Median age: 52 years (range 18–84). IM dose: 76% 400mg, 24% 800mg. Sokal score: 39% low, 39% intermediate, 22% high; EUTOS score: 93% low, 7% high. Median follow-up: 76 months (range: 7–99); 95% of patients had at least 5-year observation. BCR-ABLIS at 3 months: ≤1% in 336/487 (69%), >1% to ≤10% in 120/487 (25%) and >10% in 31/487 (6%). BCR-ABLIS at 6 months: ≤1% in 425/492 (86%), >1% to ≤10% in 54/492 (11%) and >10% in 13/492 (3%). Responses and outcomes according to transcript levels are presented in table 1. Patients with BCR-ABLIS >10% at 3 months achieved inferior CCgR and MMR rates at 1 year and inferior MR4.0 rate at 2 years, but the long-term outcome was comparable to patients with transcript levels < 10%. On the contrary, a BCR-ABLIS >1% at 3 months was associated, not only to lower subsequent response rates, but also to significantly inferior FFS, PFS and OS. The BCR-ABLIS levels able to predict for FFS, PFS and OS with maximal sensitivity and specificity (ROC curves) were 1.9%, 0.8% and 0.8%, respectively. Results were similar, with small differences, in the 6-month analysis. Conclusions. In a multicentric nationwide experience, the proportion of patients with BCR-ABLIS transcript levels >10% at 3 and 6 months was low. The risk distribution and the proportion of patients treated with high-dose IM may explain, at least in part, the differences with other published reports. At 3 and 6 months, a BCR-ABLIS cutoff of 1% was a reliable surrogate marker of response and outcome. A transcript level >10% identified a smaller cohort with inferior responses, but failed to predict the long-term outcome. A BCR-ABLIS level >1% at 3 and 6 months represents a warning, requiring a close monitoring. A switch to 2nd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be considered. Acknowledgments. University of Bologna, BolognaAIL, COFIN, Fondazione Carisbo. Disclosures: Castagnetti: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gugliotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Abruzzese:Bristol Myers-Squibb and Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavazzini:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Martinelli:Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rosti:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Conventional Real Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Method Yields Similar Level of Sensitivity to Digital Droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of BCR-ABL p210 Transcripts in Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3382-3382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Asghari ◽  
Chetasi Talati ◽  
Alexandra Achille ◽  
John J. Powers ◽  
Eva Sahakian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Tki Discontinuation

Introduction: Several studies have investigated the utility of digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in the detection of p210 BCR-ABL fusion transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and have suggested greater sensitivity compared to real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). There is limited data regarding the utility and sensitivity of ddPCR in patients with chronic phase CML (CP-CML) who are candidates for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) discontinuation. We aimed to investigate the capability of ddPCR to detect p210 BCR-ABL transcript levels in CP-CML patients and compare the sensitivity to RT-qPCR. Methods: We analyzed 103 different peripheral blood (n=98) and bone marrow (n=5) samples from 36 patients with CP-CML treated at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2013 and 2018. Samples were from patients who either met clinical criteria for TKI discontinuation or were enrolled in a phase I dose-escalation study evaluating combination therapy with nilotinib plus ruxolitinib who had at least a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) to TKI therapy with detectable BCR-ABL transcripts by RT-PCR at the time of enrollment(1, 2). BCR-ABL levels were assessed by RT-qPCR at the time of collection with level of transcript reported as % International Standard (%IS). Samples collected from 2013 to 2014 were reported as p210 to ABL and converted to %IS per lab-specific conversion factor. Stored purified RNA samples were obtained retrospectively and ddPCR was performed using the QX-200 Droplet Digital PCR System and QXDx BCR-ABL %IS Kit (Bio-Rad). Droplets were analyzed by QXDx BCR-ABL reporter software to determine p210 transcript level (%IS). Analysis for RNA degradation of stored samples was performed via High Sensitivity RNA ScreenTape (Agilent). Samples that did not pass quality check upon performing ddPCR were excluded from further analysis. Correlation coefficient was calculated with p-value of <0.05 being significant. Results: Of the 36 patients, 28 were in the TKI discontinuation cohort and 10 were enrolled in the clinical trial of nilotinib plus ruxolitinib. Two patients who participated in the clinical trial subsequently also met criteria for TKI discontinuation. In the TKI discontinuation cohort, 46% of patients (n=13) lost major molecular response (MMR) with a median time to loss of MMR of 88 days. We observed a statistically significant correlation between RT-qPCR and ddPCR levels when comparing %IS (correlation coefficient R2=0.42; p<0.0001) as well as calculated molecular response (MR) logarithm values of all available samples (R2=0.67; p <0.0001) (Figure 1). There was a weaker correlation between patients determined to have MMR by RT-qPCR (MR≥3.0) compared to ddPCR (R2=0.55; p <0.0001) (Figure 2). A total of 91 different samples were consistent with MMR when tested by RT-PCR. Of these samples, 85.7% (n=78) were consistent with MMR when tested by ddPCR and the remaining 14.3% (n=13) appeared to have higher detectable levels of p210 transcripts (MR<3.0). When investigating deeper molecular responses, 62 samples were consistent with MR≥4.0 by RT-PCR, and 20.9% (n=13) of these samples did not achieve a deep molecular response (MR<4.0) when tested by ddPCR. Of note, 5 representative samples were also evaluated for potential RNA degradation and 3 were noted to have significant degradation present. Conclusion: Compared to RT-PCR, ddPCR represents a viable method for detection of p210 transcripts for patients with CP-CML. The two methods yield similar efficacy when detecting varying levels of molecular response, however further research is warranted for the ability to detect deeper molecular responses for patients in MMR. Our study is limited by inherent retrospective bias and quality of RNA in stored samples. 1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (Version 1.2019). 2. Sweet K, Hazlehurst L, Sahakian E, Powers J, Nodzon L, Kayali F, et al. A phase I clinical trial of ruxolitinib in combination with nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with molecular evidence of disease. Leuk Res. 2018;74:89-96. Disclosures Talati: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria. Shelton:Bio-Rad: Employment. Nodzon:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Abbvie: Other: Speaker Fees; Genentech: Consultancy, Other: Speaker Fees; Pfizer: Consultancy. Sweet:Stemline: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pinilla Ibarz:Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau.

Discontinuation of Imatinib in Children with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An International Registry of Childhood Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (I-CML-Ped) Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 53-54
Author(s):  
Frédéric Millot ◽  
Meinolf Suttorp ◽  
Stéphanie Ragot ◽  
Guy Leverger ◽  
Jean-Hugues Dalle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Free Remission ◽  
Tki Discontinuation

Background: Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is currently proposed as first line therapy in children with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). Studies in adults with CML demonstrated that 40 to 50% of patients with prolonged deep molecular response under TKI could discontinue TKI permanently without molecular relapse. However, data regarding TKI discontinuation in children with CML are limited. Methods: Using the ELN criteria we identified in the International Registry of Childhood Chronic Myeloid Leukemia 18 patients less than 18 years of age at diagnosis with CML in CP exhibiting under imatinib treatment sustained deep molecular response &gt;MR4.0 (DMR) for ≥ 2 years and then discontinued the TKI. We retrospectively analyzed outcome of these patients and treatment-free remission rate (TFR) at various time points. Treatment with imatinib was resumed in case of molecular relapse defined as loss of major molecular response (MMR). Results: There were 11 boys and 7 girls. From diagnosis in CP until TKI discontinuation the 18 children showed no progression, resistance, warning or suboptimal response or switch to another TKI before discontinuation. Median age at diagnosis of CML was 11.9 years (range, 2.3 to 15.8 years) and median age at discontinuation of TKI was 16 years (range, 9 to 24 years). Median overall follow-up from diagnosis of CML was 107 months (range, 67-209 months). DMR was achieved after a median time of 12 months (range, 3 - 50 months) on imatinib. Before discontinuation median treatment duration of imatinib was 73.25 months (range, 32 to 109 months) and median duration of MR4.0 was 46.2 months (range, 23.9 to 98.6 months). Seven patients experienced molecular relapse 4.1 months (range, 1.9-6.4 months) after stopping and restarted imatinib. Two patient resumed imatinib 3.6 and 3.4 months after discontinuation because of increased in transcript level (from 0.001% to 0.01 and 0.012, respectively) but without loss of MMR. The median molecular follow up after discontinuation was 116 months (range, 71 to 209 months) for the patients without molecular relapse. The proportion of patients maintaining molecular free remission was 61% (95% CI, 38%-83%), 56% (95% CI, 33%-79%) and 56% (95% CI, 33%-79%) at 6, 12, and 36 months, respectively (Figure 1). Six of the 7 children who experienced molecular relapse after discontinuation again achieved MR4.0 at median of 4.7 months (range, 2.5-18 months) after restart of imatinib; the remaining patient achieved MMR but not DMR and was switched to Dasatinib. No withdrawal syndrome was observed in this cohort of 18 patients. In univariate analysis, age, sex, Sokal and ELTS scores, imatinib treatment duration before discontinuation and duration of DMR until imatinib discontinuation had no influence on treatment free remission. Conclusion: These data indicate that imatinib could be safely discontinued in children younger than 18 years of age at diagnosis of CML with sustained MR4.0 for at least 2 years under imatinib. Larger studies of TKI discontinuation in children with CML are needed in order to identify factors predicting treatment free remission. Disclosures Dalle: Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria; Orchard: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; AbbVie Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Restrospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Dasatinib and Nilotinib in Patients with Imatinib-Resistant or –intolerant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: Korean CML Working Party

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1691-1691
Author(s):  
Jeong-Ok Lee ◽  
Inho Kim ◽  
Joo-Seop Chung ◽  
Yeo-Kyeoung Kim ◽  
Ho-Young Yhim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Abstract 1691 Dasatinib and nilotinib have been founded to be effective and well-tolerated in patients who develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib. Not enough data are currently available to recommend one over the other as the preferred second-line therapy based on efficacy data. Therefore we planned a multicenter retrospective study to analyze the efficacy and safety of dasatinib and nilotinib in patients with imatinib-resistant or –intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. In this Korean multicenter study, 126 patients imatinib-resistant or –intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase were treated with dasatinib (n=76) or nilotinib (n=50) The purpose of this study was to compare rates of cytogenetic and molecular response rate, event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and toxicities of nilotinib and dasatinib treatment of imatinib-resistant or –intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. PFS was defined as the time from the start of treatment to the earliest date of any of following event: loss of complete hematologic response (CHR), loss of major cytogenetic response (MCyR), progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blastic phase (BP), discontinuation due to treatment failure as assessed by the clinician, and death from any cause on therapy. Event was defined by any one of the following: loss of CHR, loss of MCyR, progression to AP or BP, discontinuation due to treatment failure as assessed by the clinician, treatment discontinuation due to toxicity, and death from any cause on therapy. For dasatinib and nilotinib group, median ages (51 years old vs. 53), median durations of CML (23.7 months vs. 19.8 ) before receiving dasatinib or nilotinib and duration of prior imatinib treatment (21.7 months vs 17.7) were comparable. Nilotinib group had a higher proportion of intermediate and high sokal scores at the time of diagnosis than dasatinib group (41.5 vs 29.3% (high), 41.5% vs 32.5%(intermediate), 17.1% vs 37.9(low), p= 0.04). After median follow-up durations of 20.2 months of dasatinib group and 25.3 months of nilotinib group, the rates of major molecular response were 50.0% for dasatinib group and 59.6% for nilotinib group (p=NS) and the rates of MCyR (complete and partial cytogenetic response) were 78.4% for dasatinib group and 74.5% for nilotinib group (p=NS). The estimated EFS at 24 months was 67% and 48% in dasatinib and nilotinib group, respectively. (p<0.05). The estimated PFS at 24 months was 85% and 56% in dasatinib and nilotinib group, respectively. (p<0.05) Overall survival rates were comparable in both treatment groups (24-months OS; dasatinib 91%, nilotinib 94%; p=0.65). Both were generally well tolerated. Hematologic toxicities were more frequent among patients receiving dasatinib. 10 patients (13%) had pleural effusion in dasatinib; 9 events were grade 1 or 2. Elevated liver enzyme were more frequent among patients receiving dasatinib. In conclusion, In this study population, nilotinib and dasatinib showed similar cytogenetic and molecular response rates and survival. Toxicity profiles of two drugs were different and both drugs showed tolerable toxicities. In terms of event-free survival and progression-free survival, dasatinib was superior to nilotinib, but caution is warranted in interpretation because baseline characteristics including hematologic and cytogenetic response at the time of start with dasatinib and nilotinib and sokal scores at the time of diagnosis were different. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals A Phase I Trial of Incorporating Natural Killer (K-NK) Cells for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Molecular Residual Disease after Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Therapy

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5-5
Author(s):  
Lindsay A.M. Rein ◽  
David A Rizzieri
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) ushering in an era where, in select patient populations, treatment planning goals have shifted towards the achievement of treatment free remission (TFR) after TKI cessation. Both duration and depth of response to TKI therapy are predictors of future success in achieving a lasting TFR and with improved outcomes independent of TKI cessation. Unfortunately, molecular residual disease (MRD) persists in many patients despite optimal therapy and predicts for worse outcomes over time and decreased ability to maintain a TFR after TKI cessation. Achievement of a major molecular response (MMR) and probability of TFR have been associated with increased numbers of NK cells, particularly mature cytolytic NK cells. Kiadis K-NK003 cells are off-the-shelf NK cells from a universal donor expanded using PM21, proprietary membrane particles modified to express membrane bound IL-21 and 4-1bb ligand. The resulting expanded K-NK003 cells have a hyperfunctional phenotype that are simultaneously highly cytotoxic with high release of perforin and Granzyme B, and potent producers of the cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2. This is an open label, non-randomized, prospective phase I pilot study designed to evaluate safety and to examine whether the addition of K-NK003 to ongoing TKI therapy for CML patients with persistent MRD will allow patients to achieve MRD negative status. Patients will be treated with K-NK003 on day 1 of each 14 day cycle, for a total of 6 cycles, in conjunction with their ongoing TKI therapy. The primary endpoint is safety. The efficacy objective is to estimate the rate of optimal molecular responses (negative to at least MR4.5). Secondary and exploratory endpoints include the proportion of patients with a reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts and NK cell number and function. Adult patients with chronic phase CML who have been on TKI therapy for at least 1 year prior to enrollment in the study will be eligible. Patients must have been on their most recent TKI consistently for at least 6 months prior to enrollment on study and must be expected to remain on current TKI for the duration of the study. Patients with current accelerated or blast crisis phase disease will be excluded. Disclosures Rein: Celgene: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicine: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Clinical Care Options: Consultancy, Other: Speaker. Rizzieri:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mustang: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acrobiotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document