Addition of More Immunosuppressive Drugs As Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis Does Not Improve Gvhd Outcomes in Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from Unrelated Donors

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5786-5786
Author(s):  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
Mohamad Sobh ◽  
Fiorenza Barraco ◽  
Xavier Thomas ◽  
Marie Balsat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Immunosuppressive Drugs ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Related Mortality ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background: Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have led to a dramatic reduction of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The concept of RIC is to deliver adequate immunosuppression with manageable graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and the eventual development of a potent graft-versus-leukemia effect. Nevertheless, GVHD prophylaxis remains a challenging task after allo-HSCT. While the combination of cyclosporine A (CsA) and a short course of methotrexate (Mtx) after transplantation is considered as the gold standard for GVHD prophylaxis after conventional myeloablative allo-HSCT from HLA-identical siblings, there is no consensus on the optimal preventive GVHD prophylaxis after RIC allo-HSCT. On the other hand, recent and ongoing studies are evaluating a promising GVHD prophylaxis strategy using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of different GVHD prophylaxis used after RIC allo-HSCT in patients receiving peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from unrelated donors for hematological malignancies. Patients and methods: We evaluated 127 consecutive patients with hematological malignancies who received RIC allo-HSCT and were followed in our center between January 2008 and January 2016; 74 (58%) were males, median age was 58 years (range: 18-70), 52 (41%) had acute myeloid leukemia, 36 (28%) myelodysplastic syndrome, 12 (10%) myeloproliferative syndrome, 9 (7%) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 9 (7%) chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 6 (5%) multiple myeloma and 3 (2%) chronic myeloid leukemia. At transplantation, 65 (51%) patients were in complete response (CR) or chronic phase (CP). RIC regimen consisted on fludarabine, intermediate doses of IV busulfan and anti-thymocyte golbulins (ATG) (Thymoblobulin) in 56 (44%) patients and a sequential FLAMSA regimen in 71 (56%) patients and who also received similar doses of ATG (Thymoglobulin). PBSC donors were 10/10 HLA matched in 81 (64%) patients and 9/10 HLA mismatched in 46 (36%) patients. Patients were divided according to GVHD prophylaxis into 3 groups: group 1 consisted on CsA alone with 23 (18%) patients, group 2 include patients who received either CsA + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), n= 64 (50%) or CsA + Mtx, n= 20 (16%) or CsA + cyclophosphamide n= 5 (4%), and group 3 included patients receiving CsA + MMF + tacrolimus n= 15 (12%) patients. Results: After transplantation, all patients in group 1 engrafted after a median of 17 (3-25) days, 81/89 (91%) engrafted in group 2 after a median of 17 (5-58) days and 14/15 (94%) engrafted in group 3 after a median of 16 (9-24) days. We did not observe any significant impact of the type of GVHD prophylaxis on the 100-day incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD, which occurred in 6/15 (40%), 34/81 (42%) and 7/14 (50%) for the groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively (p=0.18). Grade III-IV acute GVHD occurred in 3 (20%), 24 (29%) and 5 (33%) in the three groups respectively (p=0.11). Similarly, cumulative incidence of 1 year chronic GVHD was not different between groups 1, 2 and 3 reaching 46%, 43% and 46% respectively (p=0.6) among them 3/15 (20%), 18 (22%) and 3/14 (21%) patients had an extensive form. After a median follow-up of 22 months for surviving patients, although there was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of non-relapse mortality, we observed more infection-related mortality with 45% and 83% in groups 2 and 3 respectively compared to 47% in group 1. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 22%, 31 and 26% for the three groups respectively (p=0.23). Overall survival rates at two years were 43%, 31% and 44 % for groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively (p=0.42). The multivariate analysis taking into account the type of disease, donor HLA matching, disease status at transplantation, type of RIC and the type of prophylaxis, showed that the incidence of acute GVHD was influenced only by the use of FLAMSA regimen from mismatched donors, HR= 2.2 [1.3-3.1], p=0.05 which had also the same impact on the occurrence of chronic GVHD. Conclusion: Despite its limitations and the need for prospective randomized studies, the results of our study suggest that in the RIC allo-HSCT from unrelated donors, the different GVHD prophylaxis associations lead to similar GVHD outcomes. Patients with more immunosuppressive drugs had a higher incidence of infection-related mortality and in which PTCy could be a better option. Disclosures Nicolini: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Reduced Incidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) and Transplant-Related Mortality (TRM) with the Addition of Short-Course Mini-Dose Methotrexate (MTX) to Cyclosporine (CSA) as GVHD Prophylaxis Following Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (NST).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2990-2990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramaprasad Srinivasan ◽  
Haley Hedlin ◽  
Rose Goodwin ◽  
Aleah Smith ◽  
Catalina Ramos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Related Mortality ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Acute GVHD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following NST. A high incidence of aGVHD occurs when CSA alone is used as prophylaxis. We investigated the effect of combining either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or an abbreviated course of low dose MTX with CSA on the incidence and severity of aGVHD. Between 11/97 and 07/07, 230 consecutive patients (pts) (solid tumors n=127, hematologic malignancies n=57, non-malignant hematologic disorders n=46) underwent conditioning with fludarabine (125mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (120mg/kg), followed by a G-CSF mobilized PBSC transplant from an HLA identical (n=222: 96%) or 5/6 HLA-matched (n=8: 4%) related donor. Forty-eight pts with a history of heavy RBC transfusions or those receiving a 5/6 HLA-matched transplant had ATG (40mg/kg/d × 4 days) added to their conditioning. The initial cohort of pts (Group 1, n=66), received CSA alone (dose adjusted to maintain therapeutic serum levels) as GVHD prophylaxis. Due to the high incidence of severe aGVHD in this group, subsequent pts received CSA with either MMF (1 gram po bid; Group 2, n=82) or an abbreviated course of mini-dose MTX (5mg/m2 days +1, +3, +6; Group 3, n=82). In all three groups, decisions regarding discontinuation of CSA and MMF were based on donor T cell chimerism, presence of GVHD, and disease status. With a median follow-up of 2963, 2317 and 894 days in the three consecutive cohorts, a comparison was undertaken using competing risk analysis. The incidence of grades II–IV and III–IV GVHD was significantly higher in pts receiving CSA alone or CSA+MMF compared to those receiving CSA+MTX; the cumulative incidence of grades II–IV GVHD in the three groups was 56%, 59%, and 37% (p=0.05) while grades III–IV GVHD occurred in 30%, 34%, and 15% (p=0.019) respectively. The incidence of chronic GVHD (45% vs. 57% vs. 46%, p=0.27) was similar in the three groups. The lower incidence of aGVHD associated with MTX use was accompanied by a significantly improved TRM in group 3 pts; transplant related mortality was 21% in group 1, 21% in group 2 and 5% in group 3 pts (p=0.019). The impact of adding MMF or MTX to CSA on disease-specific outcome in pts with different malignant diseases could not be assessed due to small sample sizes. Conclusion: The addition of an abbreviated course of mini-dose methotrexate to CSA was associated with a significantly lower incidence of grades II–IV and III–IV aGVHD as well as lower TRM compared with CSA used alone or in combination with MMF in pts undergoing NST. To our knowledge this is the first report demonstrating a benefit of adding mini-dose MTX for GVHD prophylaxis in patients undergoing NST. Group 1 (N=66) Group 2 (N=82) Group 3 (N=82) P value Cumulative Incidence of Grade II–IV aGVHD (95% CI) 56% (44%–68%) 59%(48%–70%) 37%(25%–49%) 0.05 Cumulative Incidence of Grade III–IV aGVHD (95% CI) 30%(19%–41%) 34%(22%–46%) 15%(7%–23%) 0.019 Transplant Related Mortality(95% CI) 21%(11%–31%) 21%(12%–30%) 5%(0%–7%) 0.019 Proportion of Evaluable Pts with Chronic GVHD (%) 24/53 (45%) 43/75(57%) 34/74(46%) 0.274

scholarly journals Children with Acute Leukemia Given Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) from an HLA-Compatible Sibling, or an Unrelated Donor (UD) or an HLA-Haploidentical Relative after Alpha/Beta T-Cell Depletion Have a Comparable Outcome

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 195-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Bertaina ◽  
Barbarella Lucarelli ◽  
Riccardo Masetti ◽  
Pietro Merli ◽  
Roberto Rondelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Cell Depletion ◽  
T Cell Depletion ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background: Allogeneic HSCT is a widely used treatment for children with acute leukemia (AL) either relapsed or at high risk of treatment failure. However, an HLA-identical sibling is available for only 20-25% of patients and an UD can be located in a suitable time only for a portion of the remaining population. HSCT from an HLA-haploidentical relative (haplo-HSCT) is now considered an alternative option, especially in view of the recent insights in graft manipulation. We recently developed a novel method of more selective T-cell depletion based on physical elimination of α/β T cells (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01810120), shown to be effective for both preventing graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and for conferring improved protection against infections in comparison to haplo-HSCT performed through the infusion of positively selected CD34+ cells. The initial results on 40 patients with AL were reported at the ASH Meeting in 2013 (Bertaina et al). We now present the comparison of the outcome of 80 children with AL given haplo-HSCT after α/β T-cell depletion (group 1) with that of patients transplanted from an HLA-identical sibling (group 2) or an UD (group 3) in the same time period. Patients and methods: All patients with AL were transplanted at the Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital in Rome, Italy, between December 2010 and September 2014; 80 patients were included in group 1, 41 in group 2 and 51 in group 3. Patients were offered α/β T-cell-depleted haplo-HSCT in the absence of suitable conventional donor (HLA identical sibling or 10/10 UD evaluated using high resolution typing) or if affected by rapidly progressive disease not permitting time to identify an UD. Clinical characteristics of patients assigned to the 3 groups and those of their donor are shown in Table1. All children were given a fully myeloablative regimen. No group 1 patient was given any post-transplantation GvHD prophylaxis, while patients of group 2 and 3 were given Cyclosporine-A and short-term methotrexate. Group 1 and 3 patients received ATG Fresenius® (4 mg/Kg/day) from day -5 to -3 for preventing both graft rejection and GvHD. Results: All group 2 and 3 patients had sustained engraftment of donor cells, while 1 of the 80 patients included in group 1 experienced primary graft failure and was rescued by haplo-HSCT from the other parent. The cumulative incidence (CI) of acute GvHD was 30%, 41% and 42%, respectively. Remarkably, all children of the group 1 who developed acute GvHD had a skin-only involvement, while 17% and 16.3% of those of group 2 and 3 had either gut or liver involvement (p<0.001). The CI of chronic GvHD was significantly lower in group 1 children than in those of groups 2 and 3 (p=0.02, see also Figure 1-Panel A). None of the 4 group 1 patients experiencing chronic GvHD had the extensive form of the disease, while the CI of extensive chronic GvHD of group 2 and 3 was 8% and 14%, respectively (p=0.01). Four, 1 and 6 children of patients assigned in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively, died for transplant-related causes; the CI of transplantation-related mortality (TRM) in the 3 groups is shown in Figure 1-Panel B. Relapse was the main cause of treatment failure and occurred at a comparable CI in all the 3 groups (see also Panel C of Figure 1). The 3-year probability of Event-Free Survival (EFS) was comparable in the 3 groups (Figure 1 - Panel D). In multivariate analysis, a Total Body Irradiation (TBI)-containing regimen was the only variable favourably influencing EFS of group 1 children (hazard ratio 2.93, 95% Confidence Interval 1.24-6.95). No variable influenced EFS of group 2 and 3 patients. Conclusions: Overall, these data indicate that haplo-HSCT after α/β T-cell depletion is associated with a risk of TRM and leukemia recurrence comparable to that of transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling or an UD, this translating in a similar probability of EFS. In view of the low incidence of chronic GvHD, this transplant option has to be considered a competitive alternative for children with AL in need of an allograft. Table. Sibling (n=41) MUD (n=51) Haplo (n=80) Sex p=0.77 M 27 32 55 F 14 19 25 Age at Transplantation (years) 10.6 9.4 9.7 p=0.20 Disease p=0.23 ALL 34 35 56 AML 7 16 24 Disease status at Transplantation p=0.13 CR1 20 30 30 CR2 21 20 47 ≥CR3 0 1 3 CMV serology (Donor/Recipient) p=0.001 neg/neg 8 5 6 neg/pos 8 21 7 pos/neg 1 4 11 pos/pos 24 21 56 Source of Stem Cells p<0.0001 BM 40 40 0 PBSC 1 11 80 Conditioning regimens p=0.10 TBI-based 26 29 60 non TBI-based 15 22 20 Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Evaluation of Three Different Cyclosporine-Based Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis Regimens Following Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (NST).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1236-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramaprasad Srinivasan ◽  
Nancy Geller ◽  
Sakti Chakrabarti ◽  
Igor Espinoza-Delgado ◽  
Teresa Donohue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Malignant Diseases ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Acute GVHD is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality following NST. A high incidence of grades II–IV GVHD occurs when cyclosporine A (CSA) alone is used as prophylaxis. Consequently, we investigated the effect of combining either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or methotrexate (MTX) with CSA on the incidence and severity of acute GVHD. Between 11/97 and 07/04, 185 consecutive patients (solid tumors n=116, hematologic malignancies n=48, non-malignant hematologic disorders n=21) underwent nonmyeloablative conditioning with fludarabine (125mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (120mg/kg), followed by a G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplant from an HLA identical (n=177: 96%) or 5/6 antigen-matched (n=8: 4%) related donor. Twenty-four patients with a history of heavy RBC transfusions or those receiving a 5/6 HLA-matched transplant had anti-thymocyte globulin (40mg/kg/d x 4 days) added to their conditioning regimen. The initial cohort of patients (Group 1, n=66), received CSA alone (dose adjusted to maintain therapeutic serum levels) as GVHD prophylaxis. Due to the high incidence of severe acute GVHD in this group subsequent patients received CSA with either MMF (1 gram po bid; Group 2, n=82) or MTX (5mg/m2 days +1, +3, +6; Group 3, n=37). In all three groups, decisions regarding discontinuation of immunosuppression were based on the degree of donor T cell chimerism, presence of GVHD, and disease status in those with malignant diseases. In the absence of grade II–IV GVHD and disease progression, CSA (+/− MMF) was tapered slowly beginning on day +60. Baseline characteristics of patients in the three groups were compared using the Wilcoxon test for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for discrete variables. The three groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, sex mismatch (female into male) and CD34 cell dose. Median follow-up in groups 1, 2 and 3 was 1901 days, 1248 days and 346 days respectively. The cumulative incidence of grades II–IV GVHD in these three groups was 56% (95% CI 44%–68%), 59% (95% CI, 48%–70%), and 34% (95% CI 18%–50%, p=0.11) respectively. The cumulative incidence of grades III–IV GVHD (30% vs. 34% vs. 16%, p=0.2) and the incidence of chronic GVHD (46% vs. 57% vs. 50%, p=0.49) were also similar in the three groups. Transplant related mortality was 15% (95% CI, 6%–24%) in group 1, 12% (95% CI, 5%–19%) in group 2 and 5% (95% CI, 0%–13%) in group 3 patients (p=0.44). The cumulative incidence of death from acute GVHD was 9% (95% CI, 0%–16%) and 2% (95% CI, 0–5%) respectively in groups 1 and 2, while no deaths from acute GVHD occurred in group 3. Overall survival in the three groups did not differ significantly (log-rank test, p=0.48), with medians 244 days (95% CI 196–402), 486 days (95% CI 306–620) and 438 days, (95% CI 210–662) respectively. The impact of adding MMF or MTX to CSA on disease-specific outcome in patients with malignant diseases was not assessed. Conclusion: There was a trend towards a lower incidence of grades II–IV GVHD in group 3 patients. However, despite the addition of either MMF or MTX to CSA, severe grade III–IV acute GVHD remains a major morbidity complicating NST. Additional strategies aimed at preventing GVHD and optimizing the management of established GVHD are needed to improve outcome following this approach.

scholarly journals Significance of Degree of HLA Disparity When Using Haploidentical Donors with T-Replete PBSC and Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in First Complete Hematologic Remission (CR1)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3910-3910
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Ernesto Ayala ◽  
Ali Bazarbachi ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Hla Mismatches ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background: Haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo) has expanded applicability of the procedure to patients for whom a suitable HLA compatible donor was not available in the past. A small multicenter retrospective study of 185 patients with hematologic malignancies who received a nonmyeloablative preparative regimen followed by infusion of bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic cells from haploidentical donors showed no significant association between the number of HLA mismatches (HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 combined) and risk of acute grade 2-4 graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.89; P=0.68 for 3-4 mismatches vs fewer antigen mismatches). This haploidentical transplant platform has certainly evolved. Nowadays, G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are commonly used owing to its increased convenience vis-à-vis performing a BM harvest. Study population: Here, we evaluate post transplant outcomes when using haploidentical donors with T-replete PBSC and PTCy in AML in CR1. A total of 494 patients (4/8 HLA mismatch (group 1)=360, 2-3/8 HLA mismatch (group 2)=134) underwent the procedure at an EBMT participating center. The primary endpoints were cumulative incidences of grade 2-4 acute GVHD and chronic (all grades) GVHD. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of relapse (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free (LFS) and overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS). Results: Group 1 and group 2 were not statistically different in regards to median age at allografting (54.1 vs. 56.1 years, p=0.51), median year of haplo transplantation (2018 vs. 2018, p=0.36), incidence of de novo AML (86.4% vs. 88.1%, p=0.63), Karnofsky equal or more than 90 (77.5% vs. 79.1%, p=0.70), and use of myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (44.7% vs. 48.5%, p=0.45). Patients in group 1 had a longer time from diagnosis to haplo-transplantation (5.3 vs. 4.9 months, p=0.03). In multivariate analysis, group 1 and group 2 did not differ in cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD (Hazard ratio (HR)=0.89 (95%CI=0.62-1.26), p=0.51) but group 1 had a significantly higher incidence of chronic (all grades) GVHD (HR=1.49 (95%CI=1.02-2.16), p=0.04). There was no difference in RI (HR=0.73 (95%CI=0.47-1.14), p=0.17), NRM (HR=1.25 (95%CI=0.78-2.02), p=0.36), LFS (HR=0.95 (95%CI=0.69-1.31), p=0.76), OS (HR=1.09 (95%CI=0.76-1.55), p=0.64) and GRFS (HR=1.07 (95%CI=0.81-1.42), p=0.64) between the groups. Presence of adverse cytogenetics was independently associated with higher RI (HR=1.90 (95%CI=1.20-2.99), p=0.006), inferior LFS (HR=1.59 (95%CI=1.15-2.19), p=0.005), inferior OS (HR=1.48 (95%CI=1.05-2.08), p=0.03), and worse GRFS (HR=1.54 (95%CI=1.17-2.04), p=0.002). Conclusion: Results show that patients undergoing haplo-transplantation with 4/8 (vs. 2-3/8) HLA mismatches have a higher incidence of chronic GVHD (all grades) without adversely affecting acute grade 2-4 GVHD, RI, LFS, OS and GRFS. Disclosures Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Bazarbachi: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Hikma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. McDonald: BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Forcade: Novartis: Other: travel grant. Ciceri: IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele: Current Employment. Mohty: Takeda: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria.

Long-Term Survival Is Demonstrated in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Both the Consolidation and Salvage Settings

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2302-2302
Author(s):  
Phyllis McKiernan ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Tracy Andrews ◽  
Scott D. Rowley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Related Mortality

Abstract Background: Allogeneic transplantation (alloHSCT) is a potentially curative treatment option for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). Questions such as optimal donor source, role of graft versus host disease (GvHD), treatment-related mortality and patient selection still remain. Methods: We report on 118 consecutive pts with MM who received an alloHSCT between November 2004 and September 2015 at the John Theurer Cancer Center. Pts received either a non-myeloablative (NMA), a reduced intensity (RIC) or a myeloablative (MA) regimen. The NMA regimens consisted of combinations of fludarabine (flu)/cyclophosphamide and low dose TBI. The RIC regimens consisted of flu/melphalan (mel) or flu/mel/bortezomib with the addition of low dose thymoglobulin (ATG) for unrelated donors (URD). The MA regimen was busulfan/mel, also with ATG for unrelated donors. All pts received at least one prior autograft. The consolidation group was defined as pts entering their allogeneic HSCT for consolidation after demonstrating a response (>/= PR) to their first autograft and without evidence of progression. The salvage group was defined as pts with < PR or with relapse after their first autograft. Results: The median age was 54 years (range 35-66) and 48 (41%) pts were female. Seventy-five pts were in the consolidation group and 43 pts were in the salvage group. The hematopoietic cell donors were 67 related donors (RD) including 9 (8%) haplo-identical, and 51 URD including 17 (14%) mismatched donors. In our cohort, 10 (8%) pts received a MA, 72 (61%) received a RIC and 36 (30%) received a NMA regimen. The median follow-up for all surviving pts (n = 65) was 49.2 months (6.9-134.3). There were no significant differences between the RD and the URD cohorts except for lower age of unrelated donors (p<0.0001). Overall 40 (34%) pts achieved a CR, 35 (30%) pts a VGPR, 23 (19%) pts a PR and 10 (8%) pts had stable disease as their best response post transplantation. Sixty-two (52%) pts relapsed post transplantation, of whom 37 received DLI or underwent immune suppression withdrawal, with 15 pts (42%) responding to this intervention. Pts with an URD had a higher rate of all grade acute GvHD compared to pts with a RD, 52% versus 47% (p=0.042). There was no difference in grade III/IV acute GvHD. The cumulative incidence of all grade chronic GvHD was 54%, with no difference between recipients of RD or URD. The transplant-related mortality was 15.2% with no difference between the salvage and consolidation groups. The overall survival (OS) for all 118 pts was 48% at 10 years. The OS at 10 years for the 43 pts who received alloHSCT as salvage was 36%, compared to 68% for the consolidation group (p=0.0007). In multivariate analysis, severe acute GvHD (grade III/IV), lack of chronic GvHD, and having two or more prior autologous HSCTs were significant predictors of decreased OS. Pts with severe acute GvHD had a greater mortality risk than pts without (p=0.0026), and having ≥ 2 prior auto HSCTs predicted for a higher risk of mortality (p=0.0447). Chronic GvHD was favorable, associated with a 36% improvement in overall survival (p=0.0008). Conclusions: Long-term survival can be achieved in pts receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This was observed in pts receiving alloHSCT for either salvage treatment or consolidation, with an acceptable transplant-related mortality. Donor source had no obvious effect on outcome. The development of chronic GvHD was significantly associated with improved survival (p=0.0008) supporting the importance of the graft-vs-myeloma effect. Disclosures Siegel: Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Vesole:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Biran:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Richter:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen: Speakers Bureau. Skarbnik:Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Goy:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Writing support, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; infinity: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Decreased Rejection and Improved Survival of First and Second Marrow Transplants for Severe Aplastic Anemia (A 26-Year Retrospective Analysis)

Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. 2742-2749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Stucki ◽  
Wendy Leisenring ◽  
Brenda M. Sandmaier ◽  
Jean Sanders ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aplastic Anemia ◽  
Graft Rejection ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Severe Aplastic Anemia ◽  
Probability Of Survival ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
American Society ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Between 1970 and 1996, 333 patients with severe aplastic anemia underwent HLA-matched related marrow transplant after conditioning with cyclophosphamide (CY). Thirty-five percent of patients transplanted between 1970 and 1976 (group 1), 12% of those transplanted between 1977 and 1981 (group 2), and 9% of patients transplanted between 1982 and 1997 (group 3) had graft rejection. Graft rejection occurred later among group 3 patients (median, 180 days) than among those in groups 1 and 2 (medians, 28 and 47 days, respectively; P &lt; .001 group 3 v 2). In group 3, 92% of rejecting patients underwent a second transplant, compared with 78% and 77% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Group 1 patients received various conditioning regimens before second transplant, whereas most patients of groups 2 and 3 received CY combined with antithymocyte globulin (ATG). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after second transplant consisted of methotrexate (MTX) for all group 1 and 2 patients, whereas group 3 patients received MTX combined with cyclosporine (CSP). Over the three time periods studied, first graft rejection decreased from 35% to 9%, and the proportion of rejecting patients undergoing second transplants increased from 77% to 92%. The 10-year probability of survival after second transplants increased from 5% to 83%. Multivariate analysis showed MTX/CSP GVHD prophylaxis to be a significant factor accounting for the increase in patient survival after second transplant. © 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.

Less Treatment Related Mortality with Variable Intensity Conditioning Than Non-Myeloablative Conditioning in Unrelated and Related Adult Allogeneic Transplant Recipients.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5051-5051
Author(s):  
Carolyn L. Bigelow ◽  
Stephanie Elkins ◽  
Cheryl L. Hardy ◽  
Joe Clark Files
Keyword(s):  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Allogeneic Transplant ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Variable Intensity ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
One Year ◽  
Treatment Related Mortality ◽  
Related Mortality ◽  
Group 1

Abstract For the past four years our adult allogeneic transplant program has employed two alternative approaches to standard recipient conditioning, the use of non-myeloablative “mini” conditioning and variable intensity conditioning. We now report a retrospective comparison of relapse, day +100 and one year survival, engraftment and grades I-II and III-IV acute GVHD in unrelated as well as related recipients in these two preparative regimen groups. Patients with a variety of malignancies were not randomized to receive either non-myeloablative (Group 1) or variable intensity (Group 2) conditioning. Twenty patients with a median age of 49 (range 27–64, Group 1) and 17 patients also with a median age of 49 (range 24–58, Group 2) received either marrow or peripheral blood stem cells, usually with a 6/6 match grade; one recipient in Group 2 received a cord blood transplant (4/6 match). Group 1 regimen consisted of fludarabine 30 mg/m2 x 3d and TBI 200 cGY. Group 2 regimen consisted of Campath 20 mg/d either 5 or 3 days, fludarabine x 5d and melphalan 140 mg/m2 x 1d. GVHD prophylaxis was the same in both groups (standard dose cyclosporine or tacrolimus and MMF.) All patients received an adequate CD34+ cell dose and none of the products was manipulated. Relapse rate was 37% in Group 1 and 53% in Group 2. Day+100 survival and one year survival were 55% and 20%, respectively, in Group 1 vs 69% and 33% in Group 2. Only one patient in Group 2 had acute GVHD, grades I-II; none had grades III-IV. However, in Group 1, 6 patients had grades I-II and 8 had grades III-IV (40%). Graft failure occurred in five patients in Group 1, while no patients in Group 2 experienced it. We conclude, first, that in our program the application of variable intensity conditioning has been quite successful in unrelated transplant recipients, as well as in related. Second, significant treatment related mortality in the form of graft failure and acute GVHD occurred less frequently in recipients who received this conditioning than in those receiving non-myeloablative conditioning. This regimen requires some further modification to enhance its tumoricidal properties; however, its treatment-related toxicity is minimal and allows us to offer this therapy to patients with co-morbid conditions and older age.

NOD2/CARD15 Genotype and HLA-DPB1 Matching Status Can Be Used To Predict Disease Relapse in Recipients of an Unrelated Donor Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Acute Leukaemia.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 830-830
Author(s):  
J. Alejandro Madrigal ◽  
Neema P. Mayor ◽  
Hazael Maldonado-Torres ◽  
Bronwen E. Shaw ◽  
Steven G.E. Marsh
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Disease Relapse ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Risk Of Relapse ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) using volunteer Unrelated Donors (UD) has become an important and viable option in the treatment of Acute Leukaemia (AL). While matching donors and recipients usually refers to five of the classical HLA genes (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1), the impact of a sixth gene, HLA-DPB1, on the outcome of UD-HSCT is increasingly emerging. We have previously shown an increased risk of relapse with HLA-DPB1 matching and independently, with NOD2/CARD15 genotype. In light of these data, we have analysed a larger UD-HSCT cohort in order to establish the impact on transplant outcome when both HLA-DPB1 matching status and NOD2/CARD15 genotype are considered. HLA typing and NOD2/CARD15 genotyping was performed on 304 AL patients and their Anthony Nolan Trust volunteer unrelated donors. Transplants occurred between 1996 and 2005 at UK transplant centres. Diagnoses were ALL (47%) and AML (53%). 67% of the cohort were a 10/10 HLA match with 16% also being matched for HLA-DPB1. Myeloablative conditioning regimens were used in 74% of transplants. T-cell depletion was included in 82% of conditioning protocols. Bone marrow was used in 72% of transplants with the remaining 28% using peripheral blood stem cells. Two forms of post-transplant immunosuppression predominated, Cyclosporine A and Methotrexate (47%) and Cyclosporine A alone (38%). Previous studies on a subgroup of this cohort showed that HLA-DPB1 matching and NOD2/CARD15 SNPs independently caused an increase in disease relapse. Consequently, the cohort was grouped into three categories to reflect this risk, group 1 (DPB1 matched; NOD2/CARD15 SNP, n=24), group 2 (HLA-DPB1 matched; NOD2/CARD15 Wild-Type (WT) or HLA-DPB1 mismatched; NOD2/CARD15 SNP, n=112) and group 3 (HLA-DPB1 mismatched; NOD2/CARD15 WT, n=168). There was a significant difference in disease relapse between the three groups (1 year: group 1; 68%, group 2; 48%, group 3; 30%, p=0.0038). This finding persisted in multivariate analysis where being in either group 2 or 3 was protective towards relapse as compared to group 1 (RR 0.321; 95% CI 0.167–0.616; p=0.001 and RR 0.478; 95% CI 0.244–0.934; p=0.031 respectively). In the group with the highest relapse risk (group 1), this resulted in a decrease in Overall Survival (OS) (33% vs 54% in group 3, RR 0.617; 95% CI 0.359–1.060; p=0.080). The best OS was seen in the group with the lowest risk of relapse (group 3). Here, in addition to low relapse, there was increased acute and chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD) (p=0.0019 and p=0.0058 respectively). In this cohort, cGvHD (in its limited form) was associated with a significantly lower incidence of relapse (p=0.0066) and better OS (p<0.0001). In concordance with our previous theories, it appears that being HLA-DPB1 matched and having NOD2/CARD15 SNPs predicts for the worst outcome with a significant increase in relapse and reduced OS. Conversely, the ideal pairing would be HLA-DPB1 mismatched and NOD2/CARD15 WT. These data suggest that prospectively typing AL patients for HLA-DPB1 and NOD2/CARD15 SNPs will allow the prediction of disease relapse, aGvHD and cGvHD and in addition will allow the effects of being independently HLA-DPB1 matched or having a NOD2/CARD15 SNP to be offset by intelligently selecting a suitable, less precarious donor.

One Antigen HLA-Mismatched Related and 8/8 Allele Matched Unrelated Donors Are Associated with Similar Survival after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 965-965
Author(s):  
David Valcarcel ◽  
Fangyu Kan ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Stephanie J. Lee ◽  
Stephen R Spellman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Related Donor ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Patients in need of an allogenetic hematopoietic cell transplant but who lack an HLA genotypically identical sibling donor, are faced with the decision to consider a single HLA antigen mismatched related donor, or a search for a suitable 8/8 matched unrelated donor. We compared the outcomes of adult patients (≥18 years old) receiving a transplant for the treatment of AML or ALL in first or second remission from either a one-antigen mismatched related donor (MMRD group, N=89) reported to the CIBMTR or an 8/8 HLA-A, B, C and DRB1 allele matched unrelated donor (UD group, N=700) facilitated by the NMDP between 1995–2005. MMRD group was typed by serological or DNA-based methods for HLA-A, -B and –DR with all results verified by lab report review. The UD group was retrospectively typed for HLA-A, B, C and DRB1 by high resolution typing methods. Most received myeloablative conditioning regimens (77%), calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis (100%) and T cell replete grafts (100%). 13% received ATG with the conditioning regimen. Median follow-up was 54 and 38 months in the MMRD and UD groups, respectively. The MMRD group was younger (median age 35 vs 43, p=0.002), had more ALL patients with low-risk cytogenetics (43% vs 18%, p=0.005), had older donors (median age: 38 vs 34, p=0.047), were more likely to receive methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis (89% vs 77%, p=0.014) and were more likely to be transplanted prior to 2001 (62% vs 24%; p<0.001). There were no differences in patient or donor gender, diagnosis, disease-status, cytogenetic-risk of AML, time from diagnosis to transplant, stem cell source, conditioning regimen, use of ATG and Karnofsky index. Univariate comparisons (MMRD vs. UD) showed: 3-year OS (42% vs 44%, p=0.647), 3-year DFS (41% vs 41%, p=0.931), 3-year TRM (39% vs 31%, p=0.136), 3-year incidence of relapse (20% vs 28%, p=0.094), grade III–IV acute GVHD by 100 days (22% vs. 15%, p=0.147), chronic GVHD by 1 year (35% vs 47%, p=0.029). All multivariate analyses were adjusted for patient and transplant characteristics and are shown in the table below. In summary, transplants utilizing one-antigen mismatched related and 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donors did not significantly differ in overall survival or disease free survival, but chronic GVHD was more frequent after UD transplantation. Outcome RR (MMRD vs. UD) 95% CI p-value Survival 0.99 0.73–1.34 0.94 Disease-free survival 1.06 0.80–1.41 0.69 Treatment related mortality 1.14 0.77–1.69 0.52 Relapse 0.81 0.50–1.30 0.38 Acute GVHD III–IV 1.53 0.91–2.57 0.11 Chronic GVHD 0.58 0.39–0.85 0.006

Outcome of Patients Aged ≥60 After Allogeneic Hematopoietec Cell Transplantation: Age Has No Impact on Survival

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3540-3540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Federmann ◽  
Christoph Faul ◽  
Wichard Vogel ◽  
Lothar Kanz ◽  
Wolfgang A. Bethge
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Allogeneic Hct ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Abstract 3540 Historically, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been offered only to patients with good performance status and below the age of 60. However, the peak incidence of most hematologic malignancies is above 60 years of age. The introduction of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens enabled successful allogeneic HCT in patients with considerable comorbidities and older than 60 years. The impact of age on outcome of allogeneic HCT in patients ≥60 years has not been evaluated extensively. We retrospectively analyzed 109 consecutive patients (f=43, m=66) aged≥60 who received allogeneic HCT 2000–2010 at our institution. Median age of the patients was 65 years (range, 60–76). Patients were grouped in two cohorts depending on age: group 1 aged 60–65 years (n=60, median age=63) and group 2 aged 66–76 years (n=49, median age=68). Diagnoses were acute leukemia (AML n=65, ALL n=1), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=14), osteomyelofibrosis (n=7), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=9), multiple myeloma (n=8), aplastic anemia (n=1), chronic myeloid leukemia (n=2) and chronic lymphatic leukemia (n=2). At time of HCT, 41 of the patients were in complete remission (CR), 68 in partial remission (PR) (group 1: CR 21, PR 39; group 2: CR 20, PR 29) and 18 patients had a preceding HCT, 14 in group 1. Conditioning regimens were grouped in high (TBI/Bu+Cy, n=5, all group 1), intermediate (FLAMSA, Flu/Mel/BCNU, n=28, group 1=11, group 2=17), low (FLU+alkylans, n=48, group 1=32, group 2=16) and minimal (2GyTBI/Flu, n=28, group 1=12, group 2=16) intensity. Intermediate intensity conditioning was particularly used for high risk patients in PR (25/28). 22 patients were transplanted from matched related (MRD), 46 from matched unrelated (MUD) and 41 from mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD). Kaplan-Meier-estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 45% for all patients, 32% for group 1 and 62%, for group 2, respectively (p=0.02), with more patients with high risk constellation in group 1. 3-year OS for patients transplanted with MUD was 57%, with MMUD 46% vs. with MRD 0% (p=0.01). Non-relapse-mortality was 28% for all patients, 40% in group 1 and 12% in group 2, probably due to the higher intensity in conditioning in group 1. The outcomes with intermediate, low and minimal intensity conditioning were comparable, while all patients after high intensity conditioning died. Table 1 describes Kaplan-Meier estimated 3-year-OS and statistical univariate analysis by log-rank test in the different subgroups. Table 1. 3-year OS (in%) All Group 1 Age 60–65 Group 2 Age 66–76 Remission CR 52 p=0.25 31 p=0.76 77 p=0.15 PR 40 32 50 Conditioning high 0 p=0.5 0 p=0.08 – p=0.38 intermediate 52 50 53 low 48 43 57 minimal 45 17 67 Donor MRD 0 p=0.01 0 p=0.06 73 p=0.45 MUD 57 53 65 MMUD 46 40 33 GVHD acute no 18 p=0.003 13 p=0.008 33 p=0.27 ≥II 43 53 58 chronic no 39 p=0.25 36 p=0.70 52 p=0.08 limited 52 30 100 extensive 50 30 67 In group 1 the outcome of minimal conditioning was inferior compared to intermediate and low conditioning while patients in group 2 had a better outcome with minimal vs. low and intermediate conditioning. Incidences of acute GVHD ≥II, limited and extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) were 10%, 28% and 13%, respectively. In group 1, acute GVHD ≥II occurred in 13% and cGVHD in 35%, in group 2 in 5% and 41% of the patients, respectively. Acute GVHD ≥II was associated with inferior outcome (3-year OS of 18% vs. 43%, p=0.003) while cGVHD had a positive impact on OS. In group 2 patients with limited cGVHD showed better 3-year OS than patients without cGVHD (67% vs. 52%, p=0.12). Age alone had no major impact on outcome of allogeneic HCT. Patients aged ≥60 seemed to benefit from the use of MUD rather than an older MRD. Chronic GVHD had a positive influence on survival. Our data indicate that the regimen used should be tailored to disease risk and patient performance status. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document