scholarly journals A phase I trial of recombinant human interleukin-6 in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 3066-3076 ◽  
Author(s):  
MS Gordon ◽  
J Nemunaitis ◽  
R Hoffman ◽  
RL Paquette ◽  
C Rosenfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Acute Phase Proteins ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Growth Factors ◽  
Elevated Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Platelet Counts

To evaluate the hematologic effects of recombinant human interleukin-6 (rhIL-6, Escherichia coli, SDZ ILS 969, IL-6), and determine its toxicity profile, we performed a phase I trial of IL-6 in 22 patients with various myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), platelet counts < 100,000/microL, and < 5% bone marrow (BM) blasts. Patients received one of four doses of IL-6 (1.0, 2.5, 3.75, and 5.0 micrograms/kg/d) as a subcutaneous injection on day 1, followed by a 7-day wash-out period, and then 28 days of IL-6 therapy. Dose-limiting toxicities of fatigue, fever, and elevated alkaline phosphatase were seen at 5.0 micrograms/kg/d; the maximum tolerated dose was 3.75 micrograms/kg/d. All patients experienced at least grade II fever and all had an increase in acute phase proteins. Eight patients (36%) experienced at least a transient improvement in platelet counts; three fulfilled the criteria for response, whereas five others had clinically significant increases that failed to meet response criteria. Various IL-6-related toxicities prevented more than three patients from receiving maintenance therapy. Two of the three patients who received maintenance IL-6 therapy had a persistent increase in platelet counts, during 3 and 12 months of IL-6 therapy, respectively. Laboratory studies indicated that IL-6 increased the frequency of higher ploidy megakaryocytes but did not significantly increase the number of assayable megakaryocytic progenitor cells, suggesting that IL-6 acts as a maturational agent rather than a megakaryocyte colony-stimulating factor. Although IL-6 therapy can promote thrombopoiesis in some MDS patients, its limited activity and significant therapy-related toxicity preclude its use as a single agent in this patient population. Further studies, combining low doses of IL-6 with other hematopoietic growth factors, are underway.

Multi-Agent Phase I Trials in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4528-4528
Author(s):  
Richard Sposto ◽  
Elizabeth A. Raetz ◽  
Charles P. Reynolds ◽  
Paul S. Gaynon
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase I Trials ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Single agent phase I trials with conventional methodology may not be suitable for children with relapsed leukemia. Accrual of children with ALL in relapse to single-agent phase I trials is poor due to clinical urgency and a &gt; 30% likelihood of complete response (CR) with a variety conventional agents combinations (Br J Haematol.2005; 131(5): 579) with the option of hematopoietic stem cell transplant in remission. As most drugs are ultimately used in combination, a Phase I trial testing a new agent in combination with conventional agents would seem most useful and might increase accrual. However, with conventional phase I methodologies determination of a maximum tolerated dose is complicated by the toxicities of the accompanying conventional agents and by the background morbidity of relapsed leukemia. Methods: The Children’s Oncology Group (COG) study, AALL01P2, employed vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin, and pegylated asparaginase for children with ALL in first marrow relapse. We determined the incidence of conventional non-hematologic dose limiting toxicities (DLT’s) and modeled the impact on a hypothetical phase I trial of a candidate agent with no additional toxicity. Results: Among 111 patients on AALL01P2, 19% had conventional non-hematologic DLT’s. Induction therapy was judged clinically acceptable. With a traditional Phase I escalation scheme that accepts 0/3 and 1/6 DLT’s at a dose-level and rejects 2/3 and 2/6 DLT’s, an agent that adds no morbidity would be rejected as too toxic at any dose 30% of the time. Conclusion: Background morbidity confounds identification of an acceptable dose of a non-toxic new agent tested in combination with conventional drugs for recurrent ALL. We propose a modification to the traditional Phase I design that increases the DLT thresholds to 1/3 and 2/6, which effectively compensates for background toxicity and reduces the chance of falsely rejecting an acceptable agent.

Phase I Trial Examining Addition of Gemcitabine to CHOP in Intermediate Grade NHL.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4765-4765
Author(s):  
John L. Reagan ◽  
James N. Butera ◽  
Alan G. Rosmarin ◽  
Ahmed Nadeem ◽  
Fred J. Schiffman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Chop Chemotherapy ◽  
Intermediate Grade ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Regimen ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

Abstract Abstract 4765 BACKGROUND Gemcitabine induces a 20% response as single agent therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory NHL. We report phase I findings of gemcitabine in combination with standard CHOP chemotherapy with G-CSF support for intermediate grade NHL. The protocol was modified during enrollment to include rituximab in CD 20+ lymphomas. METHODS Patients received CHOP plus gemcitabine at 500 mg/m2 (Cohort 1) or 750 mg/m2 (Cohort 2) on days 1,4 of each 21 day cycle. Accrual was suspended once each cohort was filled. Dose escalation occurred after all patients in the cohort were determined to not have a dose limiting toxicity. RESULTS Between 4/02 and 5/04 10 patients were enrolled and completed the study treatment (6 in cohort 1, 4 in cohort 2). In Cohort 1, grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia, anemia, neuropathy, and constipation. Grade 4 toxicities were febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. In Cohort 2, grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, anemia and intestinal obstruction. Grade 4 toxicities included febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. One patient developed MDS 36 months after chemotherapy. Three of four patients in Cohort 2 developed dose limiting toxicities (mucositis and thrombocytopenia) requiring dose reduction of gemcitabine after cycle 1. Overall, the survival rate at 2.5 years was 71%. CONCLUSIONS This Phase I trial concludes that gemcitabine 500mg/m2 on days 1 and 4 of each 21 day cycle is the maximum tolerated dose when combined with standard CHOP chemotherapy with G-CSF support for intermediate grade NHL. Response rates are encouraging for this novel chemotherapeutic regimen. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Gemcitabine was added to standard CHOP chemotherapy in this trial.. Sikov:Eli Lilly: Honoraria.

Phase I trial of escalating doses of weekly everolimus (RAD001) in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1066-1066
Author(s):  
S. L. Moulder ◽  
E. Rivera ◽  
J. Ensor ◽  
A. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
M. Christofanilli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Interpatient Variability ◽  
Grade 3

1066 Background: Inhibition of mTOR with everolimus (E) may improve efficacy in combination with docetaxel (D), but both drugs are metabolized by CYP3A4, thus a pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction may also exist. Methods: 15 patients (pts) with MBC were treated with docetaxel and everolimus using the continuous reassessment method (CRM) to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Docetaxel doses were 40–75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Everolimus doses were 20–50 mg PO on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle (except cycle 2, where only day 8 was given to allow single agent PK analyses of both drugs). Response was measured every 2 cycles using RECIST. Results: Median age= 58 years and 77% of pts had >2 prior chemotherapies for MBC. Initially 2 of 2 pts treated (D= 75 mg/m2, E= 30 mg) developed DLT (neutropenic fever/infection), prompting a mandatory PK evaluation for all pts enrolled in subsequent cohorts. A second cohort of 3 patients (D=60 mg/m2, E=20mg) had no DLT, but no pts received day 8 of E due to grade 3–4 neutropenia. PK analyses demonstrated a 42% lowered (-42%) D clearance at the 60 mg/m2 in the presence of E (n=1). Subsequent cohorts were accrued at D=40 mg/m2 with escalating doses of E (Table). For the entire group, an 18% decrease (-18%) in D clearance was observed when D was administered concomitantly with E. High interpatient variability of D clearance was observed (range +16% to -135%). No pts had CR/PR, but 6 had SD>4 cycles and 2 had SD=8 cycles. Conclusions: Weekly everolimus appears to cause widely variable and unpredictable changes in docetaxel clearance making this combination unfeasible. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

First-in-human phase I clinical trial of QBI-139, a human ribonuclease variant, in solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3113-TPS3113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Strong ◽  
John A. Kink ◽  
Baigen Mei ◽  
Mark N. Shahan ◽  
Ronald T. Raines
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
In Vivo Models ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Naturally Occurring

TPS3113 Background: RNA has been recognized as a drug target for cancer therapy, as evidenced by the ongoing clinical trials of RNAi and antisense therapies. An alternative approach that circumvents the delivery and stability issues of RNAi and antisense is to harness the activity of naturally occurring enzymes that degrade RNA. Variants of human ribonucleases (RNase) have been generated with diminished binding to their natural inhibitor inside cells, which allows the new proteins to kill cancer cells. QBI-139, a variant that retains 95% sequence identity to a naturally occurring RNase, has demonstrated efficacy as both a single agent and in combination against multiple tumor types in in vivo models of human cancer. A first in human phase I trial was designed and initiated for QBI-139. Methods: Since QBI-139 showed efficacy against multiple cancers in model systems, a first in human phase I trial was designed for patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT00818831). Patients receive QBI-139 by intravenous infusion once weekly for a cycle of three weeks. In the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, treatment can continue on the twenty one day cycle. The trial is a standard 3+3 design with cohorts of three to six patients receiving escalating doses of QBI-139 until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose is determined. The inclusion/exclusion criteria are typical for the patient population. Forty three patients have been treated to date (January 2012) without identification of dose limiting toxicity. The starting dose in the clinical trial was 3 mg/m2 while the most recently completed cohort was treated with a dose of 50.4 mg/m2. Dose escalation is ongoing. The primary outcome is to evaluate the toxicity and tolerability of QBI-139 in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. This information will allow for identification of the maximum tolerated dose. Clinical exposure levels are being monitored by measuring the pharmacokinetics of QBI-139. Tumor response to QBI-139 will be measured using RECIST criteria. Since QBI-139 demonstrated broad efficacy in model systems, another outcome of the phase I trial may be identification of the indications for the next stage of clinical development.

scholarly journals Phase I Trial of Oral Irinotecan and Temozolomide for Children With Relapsed High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A New Approach to Neuroblastoma Therapy Consortium Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1290-1296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars M. Wagner ◽  
Judith G. Villablanca ◽  
Clinton F. Stewart ◽  
Kristine R. Crews ◽  
Susan Groshen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeIrinotecan and temozolomide have single-agent activity and schedule-dependent synergy against neuroblastoma. Because protracted administration of intravenous irinotecan is costly and inconvenient, we sought to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of oral irinotecan combined with temozolomide in children with recurrent/resistant high-risk neuroblastoma.Patients and MethodsPatients received oral temozolomide on days 1 through 5 combined with oral irinotecan on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12 in 3-week courses. Daily oral cefixime was used to reduce irinotecan-associated diarrhea.ResultsFourteen assessable patients received 75 courses. Because neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were initially dose-limiting, temozolomide was reduced from 100 to 75 mg/m2/d for subsequent patients. Irinotecan was then escalated from 30 to 60 mg/m2/d. First-course grade 3 diarrhea was dose-limiting in one of six patients treated at the irinotecan MTD of 60 mg/m2/d. Other toxicities were mild and reversible. The median SN-38 lactone area under the plasma concentration versus time curve at this dose was 72 ng · hr/mL. One patient with bulky soft tissue disease had a complete response through six courses. Six additional patients received a median of seven courses (range, three to 22 courses) before progression.ConclusionThis all-oral regimen was feasible and well tolerated in heavily pretreated children with resistant neuroblastoma, and seven (50%) of 14 assessable patients had response or disease stabilization for three or more courses in this phase I trial. SN-38 lactone exposures were similar to those reported with protracted intravenous irinotecan. The dosages recommended for further study in this patient population are temozolomide 75 mg/m2/d plus irinotecan 60 mg/m2/d when given with cefixime.

Preliminary results of a phase I trial of sorafenib combined with cisplatin/etoposide (CE) or carboplatin/pemetrexed (CbP) in solid tumor patients (pts)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13521-e13521
Author(s):  
N. S. Dhruva ◽  
T. E. Stinchcombe ◽  
C. M. Walko ◽  
M. A. Socinski ◽  
S. Bernard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Level 1

e13521 Background: Sorafenib had demonstrated single agent activity in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer. Methods: A non-comparative, two arm phase I trial escalating sorafenib in combination with fixed doses of CE or CbP was performed. A 3-patient cohort design was utilized to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Dose level 0 for all pts was a sorafenib dose of 200 mg po BID continuously. Pts on arm A received C (60 mg/m2) on day 1 and E 120 mg/m2 on days 1,2,3 every 3 weeks with escalating doses of sorafenib. On arm B, pts received treatment with Cb (AUC=6) and P 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with escalating doses of sorafenib. However, excessive toxicity was observed on arm B, therefore the trial was amended such that Cb dose was lowered to AUC=5 (arm C). DLT were assessed in the 1st cycle and defined as grade (gr.) 4 anemia or thrombocytopenia, gr. 4 neutropenia lasting > 7 days, gr. ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicity (except nausea, vomiting, and alopecia) and > 2 week dose delay. Response was assessed every 2 cycles according to RECIST, and best response was recorded. Results: Between 9/2007 and 9/2008, 20 pts were treated on the trial; median age 62 (range 47–73), male/female: 12/8, PS of 0/1: 6/14, and median number of prior therapies 2 (range 1–4). The most common tumor types were NSCLC (n=8), SCLC (n=4) and head/neck (n=2). At dose level 0 arm A (200 mg BID), 2 of 4 patients experienced DLT (gr.4 thrombocytopenia, gr.3 fatigue, febrile neutropenia and gr.4 neutropenia for > 7 days, gr.3 febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, hypokalemia, hyponatremia); 2 pts have been enrolled at dose level -1 (200 mg po QD) without DLT. Two of 3 patients enrolled on arm B at dose level 0 had gr.4 thrombocytopenia. On arm C at dose level 0 (200 mg po BID), 1/6 pts experienced DLT (gr.3 hyponatremia, dehydration, hypoglycemia). Enrollment continued at dose level 1 (400 mg po BID), but 2/5 pts experienced a DLT (both gr. 3 fatigue/anorexia). Responses observed were: PR (n=3) (all arm C), and SD (n=6). Conclusions: The MTD of sorafenib in combination with carboplatin (AUC=5) and pemetrexed 500 mg every 3 weeks is 200 mg po BID. The MTD of sorafenib in combination with cisplatin/etoposide has yet to be determined and is currently accruing at dose level -1. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A Bayesian dose-finding design for outcomes evaluated with uncertainty

2021 ◽  
pp. 174077452110015
Author(s):  
Matthew J Schipper ◽  
Ying Yuan ◽  
Jeremy MG Taylor ◽  
Randall K Ten Haken ◽  
Christina Tsien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Data Augmentation ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Continual Reassessment Method ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Continual Reassessment ◽  
Partially Observed ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

Introduction: In some phase I trial settings, there is uncertainty in assessing whether a given patient meets the criteria for dose-limiting toxicity. Methods: We present a design which accommodates dose-limiting toxicity outcomes that are assessed with uncertainty for some patients. Our approach could be utilized in many available phase I trial designs, but we focus on the continual reassessment method due to its popularity. We assume that for some patients, instead of the usual binary dose-limiting toxicity outcome, we observe a physician-assessed probability of dose-limiting toxicity specific to a given patient. Data augmentation is used to estimate the posterior probabilities of dose-limiting toxicity at each dose level based on both the fully observed and partially observed patient outcomes. A simulation study is used to assess the performance of the design relative to using the continual reassessment method on the true dose-limiting toxicity outcomes (available in simulation setting only) and relative to simple thresholding approaches. Results: Among the designs utilizing the partially observed outcomes, our proposed design has the best overall performance in terms of probability of selecting correct maximum tolerated dose and number of patients treated at the maximum tolerated dose. Conclusion: Incorporating uncertainty in dose-limiting toxicity assessment can improve the performance of the continual reassessment method design.

Multidimensional Phase I Dose Ranging Trials for Stroke Recovery Interventions: Key Challenges and How to Address Them

2021 ◽  
pp. 154596832110193
Author(s):  
Emily J. Dalton ◽  
Leonid Churilov ◽  
Natasha A. Lannin ◽  
Dale Corbett ◽  
Bruce C. V. Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Early Phase ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Stroke Recovery ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Dose Ranging

Despite an increase in the amount of published stroke recovery research, interventions have failed to markedly affect the trajectory of recovery poststroke. We argue that early-phase research to systematically investigate dose is an important contributor to advance the science underpinning stroke recovery. In this article, we aim to ( a) define the problem of insufficient use of a systematic approach to early-phase, multidimensional dose articulation research and ( b) propose a solution that applies this approach to design a multidimensional phase I trial to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). We put forward a design template as a decision support tool to increase knowledge of how to develop a phase I dose-ranging trial for nonpharmaceutical stroke recovery interventions. This solution has the potential to advance the development of efficacious stroke recovery interventions, which include activity-based rehabilitation interventions.

scholarly journals EPCT-19. A PHASE I STUDY OF RIBOCICLIB AND EVEROLIMUS FOLLOWING RADIATION THERAPY IN CHILDREN WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED NON-BIOPSIED DIFFUSE PONTINE GLIOMAS (DIPG) AND RB+ BIOPSIED DIPG AND HIGH GRADE GLIOMAS (HGG)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii307-iii307
Author(s):  
Mariko DeWire ◽  
James Leach ◽  
Christine Fuller ◽  
Peter de Blank ◽  
Trent Hummel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Genomic aberrations in the cell cycle and mTOR pathways have been reported in diffuse pontine gliomas (DIPG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG). Dual inhibition of CDK4/6 (ribociclib) and mTOR (everolimus) has strong biologic rationale, non-overlapping single-agent toxicities, and adult clinical experience. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus administered during maintenance therapy following radiotherapy was determined in the phase I study as a rolling 6 design. Ribociclib and everolimus were administered once daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively starting two-four weeks post completion of radiotherapy. All HGG patients and any DIPG patient who had undergone biopsy were screened for RB protein by immunohistochemistry. Eighteen eligible patients enrolled (median age 8 years; range: 2–18). Six patients enrolled at dose levels 1,2, and 3 without dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Currently, five patients are enrolled at dose level 3 expansion cohort. The median number of cycles are 4.5 (range: 1–20+). Among the expansion cohort, one dose limiting toxicity included a grade 3 infection and one patient required a dose reduction in course 3 due to grade 3 ALT and grade 4 hypokalemia. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia. Preliminary pharmacokinetic studies on 12 patients suggest an impact of ribociclib on everolimus pharmacokinetics. The MTD/RP2D of ribociclib and everolimus following radiotherapy in newly diagnosed DIPG and HGG is anticipated to be 170 mg/m2/day x 21 days and 1.5 mg/ m2/day every 28 days which is equivalent to the adult RP2D.

A phase I trial evaluating the effects of plerixafor, G-CSF, and azacitidine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Eric Huselton ◽  
Michael P. Rettig ◽  
Theresa Fletcher ◽  
Julie Ritchey ◽  
Leah Gehrs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Phase I Trial
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document