scholarly journals Evidence-Based Minireview: Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndromes: a focused review

Hematology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 460-464
Author(s):  
Mrinal M. Patnaik ◽  
Terra Lasho

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap syndromes are unique myeloid neoplasms, with overlapping features of MDS and MPN. They consist of four adult onset entities including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), MDS/MPN-ring sideroblasts-thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), BCR-ABL1 negative atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and MDS/MPN-unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U); with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) being the only pediatric onset entity. Among these overlap neoplasms, CMML is the most frequent and is hallmarked by the presence of sustained peripheral blood monocytosis with recurrent mutations involving TET2 (60%), SRSF2 (50%) and ASXL1 (40%); with RAS pathway mutations and JAK2V617F being relatively enriched in proliferative CMML subtypes (WBC ≥13 × 109/L). CMML usually presents in the 7th decade of life, with a male preponderance and is associated with a median overall survival of <36 months. Adverse prognosticators in CMML include increasing age, high WBC, presence of circulating immature myeloid cells, anemia, thrombocytopenia and truncating ASXL1 mutations. While allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative option, given the late onset of this neoplasm and high frequency of comorbidities, most patients remain ineligible. Hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine, decitabine and oral decitabine/cedazuridine have been US FDA approved for the management of CMML, with overall response rates of 40-50% and complete remission rates of <20%. While these agents epigenetically restore hematopoiesis in a subset of responding patients, they do not impact mutational allele burdens and eventual disease progression to AML remains inevitable. Newer treatment modalities exploiting epigenetic, signaling and splicing abnormalities commonly seen in CMML are much needed.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3005-3005
Author(s):  
Giacomo Coltro ◽  
Guadalupe Belen Antelo ◽  
Terra Lasho ◽  
Christy Finke ◽  
Animesh Pardanani ◽  
...  

Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) overlap syndromes consist of 5 distinct WHO-defined entities; namely chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR/ABL1- (aCML), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), MDS/MPN with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), and MDS/MPN, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U) (Arber et al., Blood 2016). With the notable exception of JMML, a bona fide RASopathy, the other entities are characterized by clinical heterogeneity and molecular diversity. Loss of function TET2 mutations (TET2MT) are common in myeloid neoplasms, especially CMML (60%), and are known leukemogenic drivers. We carried out this study to assess the TET2 mutational landscape and phenotypic correlates in patients with MDS/MPN overlap syndromes. Methods: After approval by the institutional review board, adult patients with WHO defined MDS/MPN overlap syndromes were included; with the exception of JMML. The BM morphology, cytogenetics and 2016, WHO-diagnoses were retrospectively reviewed and all patients underwent targeted next generation sequencing for 29 myeloid-relevant genes, obtained on BM mononuclear cells, at diagnosis, or at first referral, by previously described methods (Patnaik et al., BCJ 2016). Results: Five hundred and four patients were included in the study; including 387 (77%) with CMML, 48 (10%) with MDS/MPN-RS-T, 17 (3%) with aCML and 52 (10%) with MDS/MPN-U. The median age at diagnosis was 71 (range, 18-99) years, and 333 (66%) were male. TET2MT were seen in 212 (42%) patients, with the frequency of other mutations being: ASXL1 45%, SRSF2 40%, NRAS 15%, SF3B1 13%, CBL, RUNX1 and SETBP1 12% each, and JAK2 V617F 11% (Figure B). Among the MDS/MPN overlap syndromes, TET2 was more frequently mutated in CMML (49%) and aCML (47%) compared to MDS/MPN-RS-T (10%) and MDS/MPN-U (15%). The prevalence of patients with TET2MT increased with age, a finding consistent across all MDS/MPN subtypes (Figure C). Overall, 341 TET2MT were identified in 212 patients (mean 1.6 variants/patient, range 0-5): 120 (24%) had >1 TET2MT, while 113 (22%), 5 (1%) and 2 (0.4%) had 2, 3 and 5 mutations, respectively. CMML and aCML patients were more likely to have an age-independent increase in multiple TET2MT (28% and 24%), in comparison to MDS/MPN-RS-T (4%) and MDS/MPN-U (8%). TET2 MT spanned the entire coding sequence and were mostly truncating (78%, Figure A): 59 (17%) were missense, 14 (4%) involved the splice-donor/acceptor sites, 2 (0.5%) were in-frame deletions, 129 (38%) were nonsense, and 137 (40%) were frameshift mutations. Overall, the distribution of TET2MT was superimposable across CMML, aCML, and MDS/MPN-U; the only exception being the absence of splice site mutations in the latter two. One hundred and eighty-seven (55%) TET2MT were secondary to pathogenic single nucleotide variants (SNV), while the remainders were secondary to deletions (25%) and insertions (15%). Transitions comprised the most frequent type of SNV (65%), with the C:G>T:A being the most common (56%). Patients with MDS/MPN overlap syndrome and TET2MT were more likely to have additional gene mutations compared to wild type patients (mean mutation number 3.1 vs 2.1, p<0.0001), with common co-mutations being SRSF2 (51%), ASXL1 (42%), and CBL (17%). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 29 (range, 0-170) months; 29 months for CMML, 63 months for MDS/MPN-RS-T, 14 months for aCML, and 25 months for MDS/MPN-U. On univariate analysis, OS was superior in CMML patients with TET2MT (35 months) compared to wild type cases (21 months, p<0.0001, Figure D), and in CMML patients with >1 TET2MT (41 months) in comparison to wild type (21 months, p<0.0001) and single TET2MT (29 months, p=0.0476) cases (Figure E). These observations were not seen in patients with aCML, MDS/MPN-RS-T, and MDS/MPN-U. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that TET2MT are among the most frequent mutations in patients with MDS/MPN overlap syndromes (42%), especially CMML (49%), with an age-dependent increase in the frequency and number of TET2MT. Mutations in TET2 were found to span the entire coding sequence, with truncating mutations being more common (78%). Importantly, in CMML, TET2MT, including number of TET2MT, were associated with favorable survival outcomes. Figure Disclosures Al-Kali: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Patnaik:Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Hematology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 450-459
Author(s):  
Mrinal M. Patnaik ◽  
Terra L. Lasho

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap syndromes are uniquely classified neoplasms occurring in both children and adults. This category consists of 5 neoplastic subtypes: chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), BCR-ABL1–negative atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), MDS/MPN-ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), and MDS/MPN-unclassifiable (U). Cytogenetic abnormalities and somatic copy number variations are uncommon; however, &gt;90% patients harbor gene mutations. Although no single gene mutation is specific to a disease subtype, certain mutational signatures in the context of appropriate clinical and morphological features can be used to establish a diagnosis. In CMML, mutated coexpression of TET2 and SRSF2 results in clonal hematopoiesis skewed toward monocytosis, and the ensuing acquisition of driver mutations including ASXL1, NRAS, and CBL results in overt disease. MDS/MPN-RS-T demonstrates features of SF3B1-mutant MDS with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS), with the development of thrombocytosis secondary to the acquisition of signaling mutations, most commonly JAK2V617F. JMML, the only pediatric entity, is a bona fide RASopathy, with germline and somatic mutations occurring in the oncogenic RAS pathway giving rise to disease. BCR-ABL1–negative aCML is characterized by dysplastic neutrophilia and is enriched in SETBP1 and ETNK1 mutations, whereas MDS/MPN-U is the least defined and lacks a characteristic mutational signature. Molecular profiling also provides prognostic information, with truncating ASXL1 mutations being universally detrimental and germline CBL mutations in JMML showing spontaneous regression. Sequencing information in certain cases can help identify potential targeted therapies (IDH1, IDH2, and splicing mutations) and should be a mainstay in the diagnosis and management of these neoplasms.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 410-410
Author(s):  
Elliot Stieglitz ◽  
Camille B Troup ◽  
Laura C Gelston ◽  
Eric D Chow ◽  
Kristie B Yu ◽  
...  

Abstract Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia (JMML) is an aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasm of childhood with a 5-year event free survival of 52% after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A hallmark of JMML is aberrant Ras pathway activation due to mutations in NF1, NRAS, KRAS, PTPN11 and CBL. However, robust predictors of response are lacking, as individual mutations are not reliably associated with outcome, and relapse remains the most common reason for treatment failure. Recently, massively parallel sequencing has identified recurrent mutations in the SKI domain of SETBP1 in a variety of myeloid disorders, including JMML (Piazza et al Nat Genet 2012, Makishima et al Nat Genet 2013, Sakaguchi et al Nat Genet, 2013). These mutations had a lower allelic frequency compared to Ras pathway mutations, but were associated with poor prognosis. These and other data suggested that SETBP1 mutations contribute to disease progression rather than initiation. We identified several patients with JMML who had clonal SETBP1 mutations detected at relapse. Analysis of mononuclear cell extracted DNA from serial samples of two patients who relapsed revealed an increase in the SETBP1 mutant allele frequency over time (Figure 1). Similarly, analysis of colonies plated in methylcellulose from serial time points indicated that the percentage of individual myeloid progenitor colonies that were heterozygous or homozygous for the SETBP1 mutation increased with each sequential sample despite intensive treatment. Based on these data, we tested the hypothesis that rare SETBP1 mutant clones exist at diagnosis in many patients who relapse, and that these rare cells undergo positive selection during treatment. Using a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) technology with a detection threshold as low as 0.001% of mutant DNA, we identified SETBP1 mutations in 16/53 (30%) of diagnostic JMML specimens from children treated on Children's Oncology Group trial AAML0122. Of these mutations, 12 were subclonal and 4 were clonal. Event free survival (EFS) at 4 years in patients with SETBP1 mutations was 19% ± 10% compared to 51% ± 8% in those with wild type SETBP1 (p=0.006). While samples of patients who relapsed on the AAML0122 trial were not available for analysis, one patient recently undergoing treatment who had a subclonal SETBP1 mutation (0.45% allelic fraction) detected at diagnosis by ddPCR, demonstrated an overt SETBP1 mutation at relapse. Finally, we isolated and analyzed hematopoietic stem (HSC), multipotent progenitor (MPP), common myeloid progenitor (CMP), and granulocyte-monocyte progenitor (GMP) populations from a relapsed sample with a SETBP1 mutation. Sanger sequencing demonstrated that all four progenitor compartments were affected by the mutation. Analysis of additional samples is underway. We conclude that the presence of a subclonal mutation in SETBP1 is a novel biomarker of adverse outcome in JMML. Understanding the mechanisms underpinning SETBP1-mediated resistance and relapse, and further identifying therapeutic vulnerabilities of HSCs expressing these mutant proteins will be critical to improve outcomes for patients with JMML and other myeloid malignancies. Furthermore, the presence of a subclonal SETBP1 mutation at diagnosis might identify JMML patients who will benefit from more intensive conditioning prior to HSCT or from novel therapeutic strategies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Troup: Bio-Rad Laboratories: Employment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (42) ◽  
pp. 1710-1719
Author(s):  
Krisztián Kállay ◽  
Judit Csomor ◽  
Emma Ádám ◽  
Csaba Bödör ◽  
Csaba Kassa ◽  
...  

Abstract: Introduction: Acquired bone marrow failures are rare but fatal diseases in childhood. Since 2013, Hungary has been participating as a full member in the work of the European Working Group on uniform diagnostics and therapy in patients with acquired bone marrow failure syndromes. Hypocellular refractory cytopenia of childhood has been emphasized as a frequent entity, transplanted by reduced intensity conditioning with excellent outcomes. Aim: To analyse and compare the results of treatment before and after our joining. Method: A total of 55 patients have been treated in the 8 centres of the Hungarian Pediatric Oncology Network during 5 years between 2013 and 2017 (severe aplastic anemia: 9, myelodysplastic syndrome: 41, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: 5 patients). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was performed in severe aplastic anemia in 7 cases, while antithymocyte globulin was administered in one case and one patient died before diagnosis. In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, watch and wait strategy was applied in 4, while transplantation in 37 cases. Reduced intensity conditioning was used in 54 percent of these cases. Transplantation was the treatment of choice in all 5 patients with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Results: In the whole patient cohort, the time from diagnosis to treatment was median 92 (3–393) days, while in severe aplastic anemia median 28 (3–327) days only. Grade II–IV acute graft versus host disease occurred in 22.6%, grade III–IV in 6.8% and chronic in 11.2%. All the patients treated with severe aplastic anemia are alive and in complete remission (100%). The overall estimated survival rate is 85.1% in myelodysplastic syndrome, while 75% in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. The median follow-up was 30.4 (1.1–62.5) months. There was a remarkable increase in overall survival comparing the data before (1992–2012) and after (2013) joining the international group, 70% vs. 100% (p = 0.133) in severe aplastic anemia and 31.3% vs. 85.1% (p = 0.000026) in myelodysplastic syndrome. Conclusion: Due to a change in the paradigm of the conditioning regimen in hypocellular refractory cytopenia of childhood, the overall survival rate has significantly increased. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(42): 1710–1719.


2021 ◽  
Vol 218 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Louka ◽  
Benjamin Povinelli ◽  
Alba Rodriguez-Meira ◽  
Gemma Buck ◽  
Wei Xiong Wen ◽  
...  

Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a poor-prognosis childhood leukemia usually caused by RAS-pathway mutations. The cellular hierarchy in JMML is poorly characterized, including the identity of leukemia stem cells (LSCs). FACS and single-cell RNA sequencing reveal marked heterogeneity of JMML hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), including an aberrant Lin−CD34+CD38−CD90+CD45RA+ population. Single-cell HSPC index-sorting and clonogenic assays show that (1) all somatic mutations can be backtracked to the phenotypic HSC compartment, with RAS-pathway mutations as a “first hit,” (2) mutations are acquired with both linear and branching patterns of clonal evolution, and (3) mutant HSPCs are present after allogeneic HSC transplant before molecular/clinical evidence of relapse. Stem cell assays reveal interpatient heterogeneity of JMML LSCs, which are present in, but not confined to, the phenotypic HSC compartment. RNA sequencing of JMML LSC reveals up-regulation of stem cell and fetal genes (HLF, MEIS1, CNN3, VNN2, and HMGA2) and candidate therapeutic targets/biomarkers (MTOR, SLC2A1, and CD96), paving the way for LSC-directed disease monitoring and therapy in this disease.


Author(s):  
Hironobu Kitazawa ◽  
Yusuke Okuno ◽  
Hideki Muramatsu ◽  
Kosuke Aoki ◽  
Norihiro Murakami ◽  
...  

Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a rare myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm that develops during infancy and early childhood. The array-based international consensus definition of DNA methylation has recently classified patients with JMML into the following three groups: high methylation (HM), intermediate methylation (IM), and low methylation (LM). To develop a simple and robust methylation clinical test, 137 patients with JMML have been analyzed using the Digital Restriction Enzyme Analysis of Methylation (DREAM), which is a next-generation sequencing based methylation analysis. Unsupervised consensus clustering of the discovery cohort (n=99) using the DREAM data has identified HM and LM subgroups (HM_DREAM, n=35; LM_DREAM; n=64). Of the 98 cases that could be compared with the international consensus classification, 90 cases of HM (n=30) and LM (n=60) had 100% concordance with the DREAM clustering results. For the remaining eight cases classified as the IM group, four cases were classified into the HM_DREAM group and four cases into the LM_DREAM group. A machine-learning classifier has been successfully constructed using a Support Vector Machine (SVM), which divided the validation cohort (n=38) into HM (HM_SVM; n=18) and LM (LM_SVM; n=20) groups. Patients with the HM_SVM profile had a significantly poorer 5-year overall survival rate than those with the LM_SVM profile. In conclusion, a robust methylation test has been developed using the DREAM analysis for patients with JMML. This simple and straightforward test can be easily incorporated in diagnosis to generate a methylation classification for patients so that they can receive risk-adapted treatment in the context of future clinical trials.


Leukemia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1658-1668
Author(s):  
Aurélie Caye ◽  
Kevin Rouault-Pierre ◽  
Marion Strullu ◽  
Elodie Lainey ◽  
Ander Abarrategi ◽  
...  

AbstractJuvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a rare aggressive myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm of early childhood, initiated by RAS-activating mutations. Genomic analyses have recently described JMML mutational landscape; however, the nature of JMML-propagating cells (JMML-PCs) and the clonal architecture of the disease remained until now elusive. Combining genomic (exome, RNA-seq), Colony forming assay and xenograft studies, we detect the presence of JMML-PCs that faithfully reproduce JMML features including the complex/nonlinear organization of dominant/minor clones, both at diagnosis and relapse. Further integrated analysis also reveals that although the mutations are acquired in hematopoietic stem cells, JMML-PCs are not always restricted to this compartment, highlighting the heterogeneity of the disease during the initiation steps. We show that the hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell phenotype is globally maintained in JMML despite overexpression of CD90/THY-1 in a subset of patients. This study shed new lights into the ontogeny of JMML, and the identity of JMML-PCs, and provides robust models to monitor the disease and test novel therapeutic approaches.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document