Comparison of quality of life and causes of hospitalization between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in China

Background In-center hemodialysis (HD) has been the standard treatment for older dialysis patients, but reports suggest an associated decline in physical and cognitive function. Cross-sectional data suggest that assisted peritoneal dialysis (aPD), an alternative treatment, is associated with quality of life (QoL) outcomes that are comparable to in-center HD. We compared longitudinal changes in QoL between modalities. Methods We enrolled 106 aPD patients, matched with 100 HD patients from 20 renal centers in England and Northern Ireland. Patients were assessed quarterly for 2 years using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), SF-12 physical and mental scores, symptom score, Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale (IIRS), Barthel's score, and the Renal Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (RTSQ). Mixed model analysis was used to assess the impact of dialysis modality on these outcomes during follow-up. P values were adjusted for multiple significance testing. Results Multivariate analysis showed no difference in any of the outcome measures between aPD and HD. Longitudinal trends in outcomes were also not significantly different. Higher age at baseline was associated with lower IIRS and RTSQ scores during follow-up. One-hundred and twenty-five (60.6%) patients dropped out of the study: 59 (28.6%) died, 61 (29.6%) withdrew during follow-up, and 5 (2.5%) were transplanted. Conclusions Quality of life outcomes in frail older aPD patients were equivalent to those receiving in-center HD. Assisted PD is thus a valid alternative to HD for older people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) wishing to dialyze at home.

Download Full-text

P1547THE EFFECT OF INTERNET-BASED CLOSED-LOOP MANAGEMENT ON QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, A SELF-CONTROL STUDY

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation ◽

10.1093/ndt/gfaa142.p1547 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽

Author(s):

Fang Cao

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Peritoneal Dialysis ◽

Management System ◽

Closed Loop ◽

Health Management ◽

Management Model ◽

Self Management ◽

Dialysis Patients

Abstract Background and Aims With the continuous advancement of information technology, mobile Internet has entered every family and shown its unique advantages. The development of hospital's information construction on the management of chronic disease, the continuous improvement of hospital APP and Wechat public number functions have provided intelligent services for patients throughout the process. Along with this process, the way of hospital patient follow-up has gradually expanded and improved, and the automation and intellectualization of follow-up work has become a reality. However, The establishment of peritoneal dialysis health management professional team and the implementation of closed-loop health management model, which is based on the Internet closed-loop management model has no clear impact on the self-management ability, quality of life and treatment effect of peritoneal dialysis patients. To explore the effectiveness of Internet based in-hospital and out of hospital closed loop management on the quality of life of patients with peritoneal dialysis, it is necessary to establish a set of closed loop management system for chronic diseases patients with promotion and practical significance. Method From July 2017 to July 2018, 214 patients with continuous peritoneal dialysis were followed up regularly in the Department of Nephrology of our hospital, and voluntarily participated in this study. The mean follow-up time was 12.6 ± 1.5 months. The differences of blood electrolytes, quality control indexes, self-management ability, quality of life of renal disease and hospital satisfaction were observed before and after closed-loop management. Results Ability of self-management behavior (p < 0.001), quality of life (p < 0.001), satisfaction (p < 0.001), the incidence of infection (p < 0.05), serum albumin (p < 0.05), hemoglobin (p < 0.05)were improved after participating in the closed-loop management. Conclusion The closed-loop management system based on Internet closed-loop management model is effective for the quality of life and treatment effect of peritoneal dialysis patients, which integrates the core functions of follow-up records, intelligent early warning, doctor-patient communication and health education. Through this closed-loop management, medical staff can digitally collect, store, transmit and process the information of in-hospital and out-of-hospital conditions through follow-up analysis, health guidance and remote assistance to achieve the purpose of patient health management. This study shows that this closed-loop management system can effectively manage the health of peritoneal dialysis patients, and provides a replicable model for the management of chronic diseases. Therefore, a comprehensive closed-loop management system based on mobile Internet and information technology, with clinical care as the leading factor and peritoneal dialysis patients as the terminal is a feasible and acceptable follow-up management method for peritoneal dialysis patients and hospitals.

Download Full-text