scholarly journals The pathology of familial breast cancer: The pathology of familial breast cancer How do the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 relate to breast tumour pathology?

10.1186/bcr12 ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Bertwistle ◽  
Alan Ashworth
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Yue Jiang ◽  
Ting Tian ◽  
Chengxiao Yu ◽  
Wen Zhou ◽  
Junzhe Yang ◽  
...  

BRCA1 and BRCA2 as important DNA repair genes have been thoroughly investigated in abundant studies. The potential relationships of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants between multicancers have been verified in Caucasians but few in Chinese. In this study, we performed a two-stage study to screen BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants or variants of uncertain significance (VUS) with 7580 cancer cases and 4874 cancer-free controls, consisting of a discovery stage with 70 familial breast cancer cases and a subsequent validation stage with 7510 cases (3217 breast cancer, 1133 cervical cancer, 2044 hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1116 colorectal cancer). 48 variants were obtained from 70 familial breast cancer cases after BRCA1/2 exon detection, and finally, 20 pathogenic variants or VUS were selected for subsequent validation. Four recurrent variants in sporadic cases (BRCA1 c.4801A>T, BRCA1 c.3257del, BRCA1 c.440del, and BRCA2 c.7409dup) were identified and three of them were labeled Class 5 by ENIGMA. Two variants (BRCA1 c.3257del and c.440del) were specific in breast cancer cases, while BRCA2 c.7409dup and c.4307T>C were detected in two hepatocellular carcinoma patients and the BRCA1 c.4801A>T variant in one cervical cancer patient, respectively. Moreover, BRCA1 c.3257del was the most frequent variant observed in Chinese sporadic breast cancer and showed increased proliferation of BRCA1c.3257del-overexpressing triple-negative breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231) in vitro. In addition to the known founder deleterious mutations, our findings highlight that the recurrently pathogenic variants in breast cancer cases could be taken as candidate genetic screening loci for a more efficient genetic screening of the Chinese population.


Breast Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadashi Nomizu ◽  
Masami Matsuzaki ◽  
Naoto Katagata ◽  
Yusuke Kobayashi ◽  
Takeshi Sakuma ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 542-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maren Weischer ◽  
Stig Egil Bojesen ◽  
Christina Ellervik ◽  
Anne Tybjærg-Hansen ◽  
Børge Grønne Nordestgaard

Purpose CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity may be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; however, it is unclear whether the evidence is sufficient to recommend genotyping in clinical practice. Patients and Methods We identified studies on CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity and the risk of unselected, early-onset, and familial breast cancer through comprehensive, computer-based searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Aggregated risk estimates were compared with previous estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation heterozygotes. Results By using fixed-effect models for CHEK2*1100delC heterozygotes versus noncarriers, we found aggregated odds ratios of 2.7 (95% CI, 2.1 to 3.4) for unselected breast cancer, 2.6 (95% CI, 1.3 to 5.5) for early-onset breast cancer, and 4.8 (95% CI, 3.3 to 7.2) for familial breast cancer. For familial breast cancer, this corresponds to a cumulative risk of breast cancer at age 70 years in CHEK2*1100delC heterozygotes of 37% (95% CI, 26% to 56%), which compares with similar previous estimates of 57% (95% CI, 47% to 66%) for BRCA1 mutation heterozygotes and 49% (95% CI, 40% to 57%) for BRCA2 mutation heterozygotes. Conclusion These meta-analyses emphasize that CHEK2*1100delC is an important breast cancer–predisposing gene, which increases the risk three- to five-fold. Because the cumulative risk of breast cancer at age 70 years among familial patient cases for CHEK2*1100delC heterozygotes is almost as high as that for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation heterozygotes, genotyping for CHEK2*1100delC should be considered together with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening in women with a family history of breast cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Munir Abu-Helalah ◽  
Belal Azab ◽  
Rasmi Mubaidin ◽  
Dema Ali ◽  
Hanan Jafar ◽  
...  

Abstract Familial breast cancer is estimated to account for 15–20% of all cases of breast cancer. Surveillance for familial breast cancer is well-established world-wide. However, this service does not exist in Jordan, due to the scarcity of information with regard to the genetic profiling of these patients, and therefore lack of recommendations for policy-makers. As such, patients with very strong family history of breast or ovarian cancers are not screened routinely; leading to preventable delay in diagnosis. Whole coding sequencing for BCRA1/BCRA2 using next-generation sequencing (NGS)/Ion PGM System was performed. Sanger sequencing were then used to confirm the pathogenic variants detected by NGS. In this study, 192 breast cancer patients (and 8 ovarian cancer cases) were included. The prevalence of recurrent pathogenic mutations was 14.5%, while the prevalence of newly detected mutations was 3.5%. Two novel pathogenic mutations were identified in BRCA2 genes. The common mutations in the Ashkenazi population used for screening may not apply in the Jordanian population, as previously reported mutations were not prevalent, and other new mutations were identified. These data will aid to establish a specific screening test for BRCA 1/BRCA2 in the Jordanian population.


2015 ◽  
Vol 208 (9) ◽  
pp. 448-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ava Kwong ◽  
Jiawei Chen ◽  
Vivian Y. Shin ◽  
John C.W. Ho ◽  
Fian B.F. Law ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Alejandro Zayas-Villanueva ◽  
Luis Daniel Campos-Acevedo ◽  
José de Jesús Lugo-Trampe ◽  
David Hernández-Barajas ◽  
Juan Francisco González-Guerrero ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Zhang ◽  
Renguang Pei ◽  
Zhiyuan Pang ◽  
Tao Ouyang ◽  
Jinfeng Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document