A randomised prospective controlled study to assess the effects of a respiratory case management model on hospital readmission rates in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Davies
2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
AM Yohannes ◽  
MJ Connolly

Hospital readmission rates for COPD patients are high, with two-week readmission rates of 22% being recorded in one study of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). In a separate study, patients admitted with PaCO2> 50 mm Hg had a readmission rate of 40% at six months. There are no agreed clinical evidence factors that determine readmission. A few studies have reported that readmission is associated with an individual’s inability to cope with the disease, and that anxiety and socioeconomic status are important variables. Others argue that readmission relates to severity of lung function abnormality, changes in atmospheric pollution, and impaired quality of life (QoL).


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e43-e49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katayoun Bahadori ◽  
J Mark FitzGerald ◽  
Robert D Levy ◽  
Tharwat Fera ◽  
John Swiston

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory exacerbations are the most frequent cause of medical visits, hospitalization and death for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and, thus, exert a significant social and economic burden on society.OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors associated with hospital readmission(s) for acute exacerbation(s) of COPD (AECOPD).METHODS: A review of admission records from three large urban hospitals in Vancouver, British Columbia, identified 310 consecutive patients admitted for an AECOPD between April 1, 2001, and December 31, 2002. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for readmissions following an AECOPD.RESULTS: During the study period, 38% of subjects were readmitted at least once. The mean (± SD) duration from the index admission to the first readmission was 5±4.08 months. Comparative analysis among the three hospitals identified a significant difference in readmission rates (54%, 36% and 18%, respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed that preadmission home oxygen use (OR 2.55; 95%CI 1.45 to 4.42; P=0.001), history of a lung infection within the previous year (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.97; P=0.048), other chronic respiratory disease (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.99; P=0.03) and shorter length of hospital stay (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.945 to 0.995; P=0.021) were independently associated with frequent readmissions for an AECOPD.CONCLUSIONS: Hospital readmission rates for AECOPD were high. Only four clinical factors were found to be independently associated with COPD readmission. There was significant variability in the readmission rate among hospitals. This variability may be a result of differences in the patient populations that each hospital serves or may reflect variability in health care delivery at different institutions.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e032931
Author(s):  
Pooja Saini ◽  
Tanith Rose ◽  
Jennifer Downing ◽  
Bashir Matata ◽  
Samantha Pilsworth ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo examine the effects of a consultant-led, community-based chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) service, based in a highly deprived area on emergency hospital admissions.DesignA longitudinal matched controlled study using difference-in-differences analysis to compare the change in outcomes in the intervention population to a matched comparison population, 5 years before and after implementation.SettingA deprived district in the North West of England between 2005 and 2016.InterventionA community-based, consultant-led COPD service providing diagnostics, treatment and rehabilitation from 2011 to 2016.Main outcome measuresEmergency hospital admissions, length of stay per emergency admission and emergency readmissions for COPD.ResultsThe intervention was associated with 24 fewer emergency COPD admissions per 100 000 population per year (95% CI −10.6 to 58.8, p=0.17) in the postintervention period, relative to the control group. There were significantly fewer emergency admissions in populations with medium levels of deprivation (64 per 100 000 per year; 95% CI 1.8 to 126.9) and among men (60 per 100 000 per year; 95% CI 12.3 to 107.3).ConclusionWe found limited evidence that the service reduced emergency hospital admissions, after an initial decline the effect was not sustained. The service, however, may have been more effective in some subgroups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document