scholarly journals The impact of substituting general practitioners with nurse practitioners on resource use, production and health-care costs during out-of-hours: a quasi-experimental study

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mieke Van Der Biezen ◽  
Eddy Adang ◽  
Regi Van Der Burgt ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
Miranda Laurant
2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (8) ◽  
pp. 1813-1824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mieke van der Biezen ◽  
Lisette Schoonhoven ◽  
Nancy Wijers ◽  
Regi van der Burgt ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna Camilo Turi ◽  
Henrique Luiz Monteiro ◽  
Rômulo Araújo Fernandes ◽  
Jamile Sanches Codogno

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela dos Santos de Jesus ◽  
Julia Moreira Pescarini ◽  
Andréa Silva ◽  
Ana Wieczorek Torrens ◽  
Elzo Pereira Pinto Júnior ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (22) ◽  
pp. 1935-1945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle B. Rocque ◽  
Courtney P. Williams ◽  
Harold D. Miller ◽  
Andres Azuero ◽  
Stephanie B. Wheeler ◽  
...  

PURPOSEMany community cancer clinics closed between 2008 and 2016, with additional closings potentially expected. Limited data exist on the impact of travel time on health care costs and resource use.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study (2012 to 2015) evaluated travel time to cancer care site for Medicare beneficiaries age 65 years or older in the southeastern United States. The primary outcome was Medicare spending by phase of care (ie, initial, survivorship, end of life). Secondary outcomes included patient cost responsibility and resource use measured by hospitalization rates, intensive care unit admissions, and chemotherapy-related hospitalization rates. Hierarchical linear models with patients clustered within cancer care site (CCS) were used to determine the effects of travel time on average monthly phase-specific Medicare spending and patient cost responsibility.RESULTSMedian travel time was 32 (interquartile range, 18-59) minutes for the 23,382 included Medicare beneficiaries, with 24% of patients traveling longer than 1 hour to their CCS. During the initial phase of care, Medicare spending was 14% higher and patient cost responsibility was 10% higher for patients traveling longer than 1 hour than those traveling 30 minutes or less. Hospitalization rates were 4% to 13% higher for patients traveling longer than 1 hour versus 30 minutes or less in the initial (61 v 54), survivorship (27 v 26), and end-of-life (310 v 286) phases of care (all P < .05). Most patients traveling longer than 1 hour were hospitalized at a local hospital rather than at their CCS, whereas the converse was true for patients traveling 30 minutes or less.CONCLUSIONAs health care locations close, patients living farther from treatment sites may experience more limited access to care, and health care spending could increase for patients and Medicare.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. A625-A626
Author(s):  
M. Ondrusova ◽  
M. Psenkova ◽  
M. Mlyncek ◽  
L. Masak ◽  
L. Hlavinkova ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Demont ◽  
A Bourmaud ◽  
A Kechichian ◽  
F Desmeules

Abstract Background Although the benefits of physiotherapy is well supported in the literature, the impact of having direct access to physiotherapy is not well established. Update of the current available evidence is warranted. The aim of this systematic review was to update the current evidence regarding the impact of direct access physiotherapy compared to usual care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Methods Systematic searches were conducted in 5 bibliographic databases up until May 2018. Two independent raters reviewed studies and used the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies to conduct the methodological quality assessment and a data extraction regarding patient outcomes, adverse events, health care utilization and processes, patient satisfaction and health care costs. Results Sixteen studies of weak to moderate quality were included. Five studies found no significant differences in pain reduction between usual family physician led care and direct access physiotherapy. However, three studies reported better clinical outcomes in patients with direct access in terms of function and quality of life. Five studies did not observe any adverse events with direct access physiotherapy. Three studies showed shorter waiting time and four studies reported fewer number of physiotherapy visits with direct access. Three studies showed that patients with direct access were less likely to have medication and imaging tests prescribed compared to usual care. Five studies reported higher levels of satisfaction for direct access. In terms of health care costs, four studies demonstrated that costs were lower with direct access and one study reported similar costs between both types of care. Conclusions Emerging evidence, although of weak to moderate quality, suggest that direct access physiotherapy provides equal or better outcomes than family physician led care models for musculoskeletal disorders patients. More methodologically strong studies are needed. Key messages This review supports the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of direct access PT, while increasing access to care with a more efficient use of resources. There is a need for more methodologically strong studies to evaluate the efficiency of direct access models of care of physiotherapy for patients with MSKD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document