scholarly journals Mammography screening and mortality by risk status in the California teachers study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Lui Park ◽  
Jenny Chang ◽  
Vikram Haridass ◽  
Sophia S. Wang ◽  
Argyrios Ziogas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Overall Mortality

Abstract Background The debate continues among medical professionals regarding the frequency, starting age, and stopping age for mammography screening. Some experts suggest tailoring recommendations based on individuals’ personal breast cancer risk. Previous studies have not compared the impact of annual versus biennial mammography stratified by age group and risk category. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between mammography frequency and mortality by age group and risk category in the California Teachers Study. Methods Using data from study questionnaires from 93,438 women between the ages of 40 and 85 and linkages to the California Cancer Registry and other indices, overall and breast cancer-specific mortality by mammography frequency were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by age group and risk category at baseline as determined by the Gail breast cancer risk model. Results During the follow-up period of 20 years, overall mortality risk was lower in women who had annual or biennial mammography compared to less frequent or no mammography in all age groups. Annual mammography was associated with lower overall mortality risk compared to biennial mammography among women age 50–85. This difference was especially apparent in women age 60–74, regardless of estimated Gail risk category at baseline. Breast cancer-specific mortality was lower among women who had annual mammography compared to biennial or less frequent mammography among women age 60–74, regardless of their baseline risk. Conclusions Our findings suggest that at least biennial mammography is beneficial to most women age 40–85 and that annual mammography is more beneficial than biennial mammography to most women age 50–85 in terms of overall mortality.

scholarly journals Association Between Antihypertensive Medication Use and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuxiu Xie ◽  
Men Wang ◽  
Peng Xu ◽  
Yujiao Deng ◽  
Yi Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Antihypertensive Medication ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

Background: The prevalence rate of hypertension and breast cancer increases with advancing age. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs), β-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics are widely used to treat patients with hypertension. Although, the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and breast cancer has been highly debated, recent evidence supporting this association remains controversial.Objective: To evaluate the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and the risk of breast cancer and its prognosis.Methods: This study was conducted using data from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases retrieved for the period from January 2000 to April 2021. Articles and their references were checked and summary effects were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity test and sensitivity analysis were also performed.Results: This meta-analysis included 57 articles, which were all related to breast cancer risk or prognosis. Assessment of breast cancer risk using the pooled data showed that the use of BBs or CCBs or diuretics was associated with increased cancer risk [BB: relative risk (RR) = 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09–1.32; CCBs: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.03–1.08; diuretics: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.11]. Long-term use of diuretic increased the risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.20), whereas long-term RASIs treatment reduced the risk (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68–0.91). In addition, we found that diuretic users may be related to elevated breast cancer-specific mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.18, 95% CI 1.04–1.33], whereas using other antihypertensive medications was not associated with this prognosis in patients with breast cancer.Conclusion: Using CCBs, BBs, and diuretics increased the risk of breast cancer. In addition, diuretics may elevate the risk of breast cancer-specific mortality. The long-term use of RASIs was associated with a significantly lower breast cancer risk, compared with non-users. Thus, this analysis provides evidence to support the benefits of the routine use of RASIs in patients with hypertension, which has important public health implications.

Prior DCIS and overall mortality in women with stage I breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12593-e12593
Author(s):  
Rebecca A. Nelson ◽  
Lily L. Lai ◽  
Joanne E. Mortimer ◽  
Enrique Soto Perez De Celis ◽  
Rowan T. Chlebowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Invasive Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Breast Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Overall Mortality

e12593 Background: Whether a prior diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) impacts women later diagnosed with invasive breast cancer is unclear. If localized breast cancer following DCIS is more aggressive than localized breast cancer alone, this could inform therapy decisions. To our knowledge, no study has examined the impact of prior DCIS on overall mortality in women with stage I invasive breast cancer. The study objective was to determine if overall mortality for women with stage I breast cancer with prior DCIS is different from those with stage I disease without prior DCIS. Our hypothesis was that women with prior DCIS would have higher mortality compared to those without prior DCIS. Methods: 302,484 patients with stage I cancer diagnosed from 1998 to 2016 were ascertained from SEER. Of these, 5,011 (1.7%) had prior DCIS. Patients with DCIS were matched 1:2 to women with no prior DCIS based on age, year of diagnosis, race/ethnicity, marital status, and invasive breast cancer characteristics including histology, tumor grade, tumor size, T stage, N stage, ER/PR status, surgery type, radiation, and chemotherapy status. The primary study outcome was overall mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Cases and controls had similar demographics. Compared to women with stage I breast cancer without prior DCIS, overall mortality was statistically significantly lower in women with stage I breast cancer with prior DCIS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89 95% confidence interval [CI]0.80-0.98). Other factors associated with overall mortality were bilateral mastectomy (adjusted HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.49-0.78), radiation therapy (adjusted HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.56-0.75) and chemotherapy (adjusted HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99). Factors associated with higher overall mortality included age (trend p < 0.001), tumor grade (trend p = 0.003), and negative PR receptor status (adjusted HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.13-1.45). Breast cancer specific mortality, however, was statistically significantly higher in women with prior DCIS to their breast cancer diagnosis compared to women without prior DCIS to their breast cancer diagnosis (HR 1.24 95% CI 1.01-1.52). Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, women with prior DCIS and subsequent stage I breast cancer have lower overall mortality compared to matched controls with stage I breast cancer without prior DCIS. In contrast, those with prior DCIS have higher breast cancer specific mortality than those without prior DCIS. Reasons for this discrepancy are unknown, but since DCIS is most commonly diagnosed on mammogram, differences may be related to sociodemographic characteristics that are associated with both higher screening adherence and higher overall survival, such as higher income, higher education achievement , and higher access to health care.

scholarly journals Associated Factors and Survival Outcomes for Breast Conserving Surgery versus Mastectomy among New Zealand Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2738
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shoaib Abrahimi ◽  
Mark Elwood ◽  
Ross Lawrenson ◽  
Ian Campbell ◽  
Sandar Tin Tin
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Factors ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

This study aimed to investigate type of loco-regional treatment received, associated treatment factors and mortality outcomes in New Zealand women with early-stage breast cancer who were eligible for breast conserving surgery (BCS). This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Auckland and Waikato Breast Cancer Registers and involves 6972 women who were diagnosed with early-stage primary breast cancer (I-IIIa) between 1 January 2000 and 31 July 2015, were eligible for BCS and had received one of four loco-regional treatments: breast conserving surgery (BCS), BCS followed by radiotherapy (BCS + RT), mastectomy (MTX) or MTX followed by radiotherapy (MTX + RT), as their primary cancer treatment. About 66.1% of women received BCS + RT, 8.4% received BCS only, 21.6% received MTX alone and 3.9% received MTX + RT. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with the receipt of the BCS + RT (standard treatment). Differences in the uptake of BCS + RT were present across patient demographic and clinical factors. BCS + RT was less likely amongst patients who were older (75+ years old), were of Asian ethnicity, resided in impoverished areas or areas within the Auckland region and were treated in a public healthcare facility. Additionally, BCS + RT was less likely among patients diagnosed symptomatically, diagnosed during 2000–2004, had an unknown tumour grade, negative/unknown oestrogen and progesterone receptor status or tumour sizes ≥ 20 mm, ≤50 mm and had nodal involvement. Competing risk regression analysis was undertaken to estimate the breast cancer-specific mortality associated with each of the four loco-regional treatments received. Over a median follow-up of 8.8 years, women who received MTX alone had a higher risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05–1.82) compared to women who received BCS + RT. MTX + RT and BCS alone did not have any statistically different risk of mortality when compared to BCS + RT. Further inquiry is needed as to any advantages BCS + RT may have over MTX alternatives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document