scholarly journals Association Between Antihypertensive Medication Use and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuxiu Xie ◽  
Men Wang ◽  
Peng Xu ◽  
Yujiao Deng ◽  
Yi Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Antihypertensive Medication ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

Background: The prevalence rate of hypertension and breast cancer increases with advancing age. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs), β-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics are widely used to treat patients with hypertension. Although, the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and breast cancer has been highly debated, recent evidence supporting this association remains controversial.Objective: To evaluate the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and the risk of breast cancer and its prognosis.Methods: This study was conducted using data from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases retrieved for the period from January 2000 to April 2021. Articles and their references were checked and summary effects were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity test and sensitivity analysis were also performed.Results: This meta-analysis included 57 articles, which were all related to breast cancer risk or prognosis. Assessment of breast cancer risk using the pooled data showed that the use of BBs or CCBs or diuretics was associated with increased cancer risk [BB: relative risk (RR) = 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09–1.32; CCBs: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.03–1.08; diuretics: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.11]. Long-term use of diuretic increased the risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.20), whereas long-term RASIs treatment reduced the risk (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68–0.91). In addition, we found that diuretic users may be related to elevated breast cancer-specific mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.18, 95% CI 1.04–1.33], whereas using other antihypertensive medications was not associated with this prognosis in patients with breast cancer.Conclusion: Using CCBs, BBs, and diuretics increased the risk of breast cancer. In addition, diuretics may elevate the risk of breast cancer-specific mortality. The long-term use of RASIs was associated with a significantly lower breast cancer risk, compared with non-users. Thus, this analysis provides evidence to support the benefits of the routine use of RASIs in patients with hypertension, which has important public health implications.

scholarly journals Mammography screening and mortality by risk status in the California teachers study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Lui Park ◽  
Jenny Chang ◽  
Vikram Haridass ◽  
Sophia S. Wang ◽  
Argyrios Ziogas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Overall Mortality

Abstract Background The debate continues among medical professionals regarding the frequency, starting age, and stopping age for mammography screening. Some experts suggest tailoring recommendations based on individuals’ personal breast cancer risk. Previous studies have not compared the impact of annual versus biennial mammography stratified by age group and risk category. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between mammography frequency and mortality by age group and risk category in the California Teachers Study. Methods Using data from study questionnaires from 93,438 women between the ages of 40 and 85 and linkages to the California Cancer Registry and other indices, overall and breast cancer-specific mortality by mammography frequency were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by age group and risk category at baseline as determined by the Gail breast cancer risk model. Results During the follow-up period of 20 years, overall mortality risk was lower in women who had annual or biennial mammography compared to less frequent or no mammography in all age groups. Annual mammography was associated with lower overall mortality risk compared to biennial mammography among women age 50–85. This difference was especially apparent in women age 60–74, regardless of estimated Gail risk category at baseline. Breast cancer-specific mortality was lower among women who had annual mammography compared to biennial or less frequent mammography among women age 60–74, regardless of their baseline risk. Conclusions Our findings suggest that at least biennial mammography is beneficial to most women age 40–85 and that annual mammography is more beneficial than biennial mammography to most women age 50–85 in terms of overall mortality.

Metformin and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis and critical literature review.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Nananda Col ◽  
Leslie Ochs ◽  
Vicky Springmann ◽  
Aaron K Aragaki ◽  
Rowan T. Chlebowski
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Invasive Breast Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Breast Cancer Incidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Study Quality

25 Background: Observational studies have suggested that metformin, commonly used for diabetes treatment that increases insulin sensitivity and improves glycemic control, decreases the incidence of several common cancers. However, findings regarding metformin and breast cancer incidence have been mixed. To explore this issue, a systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed with a focus on potential biases. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search for all pertinent studies addressing metformin use and breast cancer risk by searching Pub Med, Cochrane Library, Scopus (which includes Embase, ISI Web of Science) using the Mesh terms: "metformin" or "biguanides" or "diabetes mellitus, type 2/therapy" and "cancer" or "neoplasms". When multiple hazard ratios (HR) or odds ratio (OR) were reported, the most adjusted estimate was used in the base-case analysis. We pooled the adjusted HR using and performed sensitivity analyses on duration of metformin use (> or < 3 years use), study quality (assessed using the GRADE system), and initial observation year of the cohort (before vs after 1997). Results: From a total of 421 citations, 13 full-text articles were considered, and 7 independent studies were included. All were observational (4 cohort and 3 case control). Our combined OR for metformin association with invasive breast cancer of all 7 studies was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.97). Funnel plot analyses did not suggest publication bias. Stronger associations were found when analyses were limited to studies estimating the impact of longer metformin duration (OR = 0.75. 95% CI, 0.62-0.91) or among studies that began observing their cohort before 1997 (OR=0.68. 95% CI, 0.55-0.84). Stratification according to study quality did not affect the combined OR but higher quality studies had smaller CI and achieved statistical significance. Interpretation is limited by the observational nature of reports and different comparison groups. Conclusions: Our analyses support a protective effect of metformin on invasive breast cancer incidence among postmenopausal women with diabetes. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether metformin reduces breast cancer risk.

scholarly journals Breast Cancer Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Update Meta-Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guo Tian ◽  
Jia-Ning Liang ◽  
Zhuo-Yun Wang ◽  
Dian Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background. The incidence of breast cancer in RA patients remains controversial. Thus we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of RA on breast cancer.Methods. Published literature was available from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Pooled standardized incidence rate (SIR) was computed by random-effect model analysis.Results. We identified 16 separate studies in the present study, in which the number of patients ranged from 458 to 84,475. We did not find the increased cancer risk in RA patients (SIR=0.86, 95%CI=0.72–1.02). However, subgroup analysis showed that breast cancer risk in RA patients was positively different in Caucasians (SIR=0.82, 95%CI=0.73–0.93) and non-Caucasians (SIR=1.21, 95%CI=1.19–1.23), respectively. In subgroup analysis by style, a reduced incidence was found in hospital-based case subjects (SIR=0.82, 95%CI=0.69–0.97). Similarly, subgroup analysis for adjusted factors indicated that in A3 (age and sex) and A4 (age, sex, and race/ethnicity) the risk was decreased (SIR=0.87, 95%CI=0.76–0.99;SIR=0.63, 95%CI=0.59–0.67).Conclusions. The meta-analysis revealed no increased breast cancer risk in RA patients. However, in the subgroup analysis, the risk of breast cancer is increased in non-Caucasians patients with RA while it decreased in Caucasian population, hospital-based case subjects, and A3 group. Such relationship may provide preference for risk of breast cancer in different population.

scholarly journals Associations between ADIPOQ rs2241766 SNP and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Hu ◽  
Chunguo Cui ◽  
Tong Sun ◽  
Wan Wang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
P Value ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Potential Association

Abstract Purpose We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to accurately evaluate the potential association between ADIPOQ rs2241766 gene SNP and breast cancer risk. Methods A systematic literature search on Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) identified 8 articles with 1692 cases and 1890 controls. Strength of association was evaluated by pooled odds ratio (OR), 95 % confidence interval (CI) and p value. Funnel plots and Begger’s regression test were applied for testing the publication bias. Statistical analysis of all data was performed by Stata 12.0. Results The meta-analysis results indicated that the ADIPOQ rs2241766 gene polymorphism did not significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer for these genetic models (TT vs. TG + GG: OR = 1.20, 95 % CI = 0.77–1.89, p=0.417; TT + TG vs. GG: OR = 1.05, 95 % CI = 0.71–1.56, p=0.805; T vs. G: OR =1.17, 95 % CI = 0.79–1.74, p=0.437). Conclusions This study indicated that no significant relationship between the ADIPOQ rs2241766 SNP and breast cancer. Further large-scale and well-designed studies will be indispensable to confirm our result.

scholarly journals Association Use of Bisphosphonates with Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Rui Peng ◽  
Xingzhong Liang ◽  
Gang Zhang ◽  
Yuan Yao ◽  
Zhen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Contralateral Breast Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Contralateral Breast ◽  
Effect Model

Background. Previous studies have investigated the association between the use of bisphosphonates and the development of breast cancer, which presented controversial results. Thus, this meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the current evidence of the association of bisphosphonate use with breast cancer risk. Methods. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to March 2019 by two researches, who independently selected trials, retrieved relevant data, and assessed study quality. The summary relative risk (RR) for the use of bisphosphonates on the risks of developing breast cancer was calculated using a random-effect model. Results. The present meta-analysis, which included four case-control studies, involving 55052 breast cancer cases, and seven retrospective cohort studies, involving 14641 breast cancer cases, assessed the effect of bisphosphonates on breast cancer risk. The random-effect model meta-analysis found a reduced risk of breast cancer with exposure to bisphosphonates with pooled RR of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80 to 0.94). The short-term use of bisphosphonates (<1 year) did not render significant alteration (RR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.03), while a significant 26% risk reduction of breast cancer was noted with long-term use (>1 year) (RR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.90). A protective effect of bisphosphonates was shown in contralateral breast cancer (RR=0.41, 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.84). In terms of the type of bisphosphonates, a significant inverse relationship was noted for etidronate, with pooled RR of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.96). Conclusion. This meta-analysis suggested that the use of bisphosphonates was associated with reduced risk of breast cancer, including contralateral breast cancer. Compared to other types of bisphosphonates, only etidronate showed a significant inverse relationship. Additionally, the long-term use (>1 year) of bisphosphonates was more significant in lowering breast cancer risk. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to verify this association. This trial is registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42018105024) (registered on 29 August 2018).

scholarly journals Postdiagnosis Changes in Cigarette Smoking and Survival Following Breast Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Humberto Parada ◽  
Patrick T. Bradshaw ◽  
Susan E. Steck ◽  
Lawrence S. Engel ◽  
Kathleen Conway ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Never Smokers

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to examine whether at-diagnosis smoking and postdiagnosis changes in smoking within five years after breast cancer were associated with long-term all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality. Methods A population-based cohort of 1508 women diagnosed with first primary in situ or invasive breast cancer in 1996 to 1997 were interviewed shortly after diagnosis and again approximately five years later to assess smoking history. Participants were followed for vital status through December 31, 2014. After 18+ years of follow-up, 597 deaths were identified, 237 of which were breast cancer related. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Compared with never smokers, risk of all-cause mortality was elevated among the 19% of at-diagnosis smokers (HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.36 to 2.11), those who smoked 20 or more cigarettes per day (HR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.42 to 2.40), women who had smoked for 30 or more years (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.28 to 2.05), and women who had smoked 30 or more pack-years (HR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.39 to 2.37). Risk of all-cause mortality was further increased among the 8% of women who were at-/postdiagnosis smokers (HR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.56 to 3.39) but was attenuated among the 11% women who quit smoking after diagnosis (HR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.32 to 2.52). Compared with never smokers, breast cancer–specific mortality risk was elevated 60% (HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.79 to 3.23) among at-/postdiagnosis current smokers, but the confidence interval included the null value and elevated 175% (HR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.26 to 5.99) when we considered postdiagnosis cumulative pack-years. Conclusions Smoking negatively impacts long-term survival after breast cancer. Postdiagnosis cessation of smoking may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. Breast cancer survivors may benefit from aggressive smoking cessation programs starting as early as the time of diagnosis.

scholarly journals Association of circulating leptin, adiponectin, and resistin concentrations with long-term breast cancer prognosis in a German patient cohort

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Obi ◽  
Audrey Y. Jung ◽  
Tabea Maurer ◽  
Marianne Huebner ◽  
Theron Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cancer Prognosis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

AbstractAdipokines including leptin, adiponectin and resistin have been linked to risk of obesity-related cancers potentially through low-grade chronic inflammation pathways. We aimed to assess the role of post-diagnosis circulating adipokines on long-term prognosis in a prospective breast cancer cohort. Adipokines were measured in blood collected at baseline shortly after diagnosis (2002–2005) and at follow-up (2009) from 3112 breast cancer patients enrolled in the population-based MARIE study. Half of the patients had measurements at both time-points. All-cause mortality, breast cancer specific mortality and recurrences were ascertained up to June 2015 (11 years median follow-up). Associations with time-varying adipokine concentrations overall and stratified by estrogen and progesterone receptor (ERPR) were evaluated using adjusted proportional hazard regression. At baseline (n = 2700) and follow-up (n = 2027), median concentrations for leptin, adiponectin and resistin were 4.6 and 2.7 ng/ml, 24.4 and 30.0 mg/l, 15.4 and 26.2 ng/ml, respectively. After adjustment, there was no evidence for associations between adipokines and any outcome overall. In ERPR negative tumors, highest vs. lowest quintile of adiponectin was significantly associated with increased breast cancer specific mortality (HR 2.51, 95%CI 1.07–5.92). Overall, post-diagnosis adipokines were not associated with long-term outcomes after breast cancer. In patients with ERPR negative tumors, higher concentrations of adiponectin may be associated with increased breast cancer specific mortality and warrant further investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document