scholarly journals Australian GPs’ perceptions of barriers and enablers to best practice palliative care: a qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Herrmann ◽  
Mariko L. Carey ◽  
Alison C. Zucca ◽  
Lucy A. P. Boyd ◽  
Bernadette J. Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Care Provision ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
Barriers And Enablers

Abstract Background General Practitioners (GPs) often play an important role in caring for people at the end of life. While some international studies suggest that GPs experience a number of barriers to providing palliative care, little is known about views and experiences of GPs in Australia. This study explored Australian GPs’ perceptions of barriers and enablers to the provision of palliative care and provides new insights into how to implement best practice care at the end of life. Methods This was a qualitative study using 25 semi-structured phone interviews conducted with GPs practising in metropolitan and non-metropolitan New South Wales, Australia. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results GPs reported difficulties with palliative care provision due to i) the complex and often emotional nature of doctor-family-interaction; ii) a lack of evidence to guide care; and iii) the need to negotiate roles and responsibilities within the healthcare team. GPs listed a number of strategies to help deal with their workload and to improve communication processes between healthcare providers. These included appropriate scheduling of appointments, locally tailored mentoring and further education, and palliative care guidelines which more clearly outline the roles and responsibilities within multidisciplinary teams. GPs also noted the importance of online platforms to facilitate their communication with patients, their families and other healthcare providers, and to provide centralised access to locally tailored information on palliative care services. GPs suggested that non-government organisations could play an important role by raising awareness of the key role of GPs in palliative care provision and implementing an “official visitor” program, i.e. supporting volunteers to provide peer support or respite to people with palliative care needs and their families. Conclusions This study offers new insights into strategies to overcome well documented barriers to palliative care provision in general practice and help implement optimal care at the end of life. The results suggest that researchers and policy makers should adopt a comprehensive approach to improving the provision of palliative care which tackles the array of barriers and enablers identified in this study.

Happiness at the end of life: A qualitative study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Tan Seng Beng ◽  
Wong Ka Ghee ◽  
Ng Yun Hui ◽  
Ooi Chieh Yin ◽  
Khoo Wei Shen Kelvin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Terminal Illness ◽  
Terminally Ill ◽  
Social Connections ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Pain And Suffering ◽  
The University ◽  
Eudaimonic Happiness

Abstract Objective Dying is mostly seen as a dreadful event, never a happy experience. Yet, as palliative care physicians, we have seen so many patients who remained happy despite facing death. Hence, we conducted this qualitative study to explore happiness in palliative care patients at the University of Malaya Medical Centre. Method Twenty terminally ill patients were interviewed with semi-structured questions. The results were thematically analyzed. Results Eight themes were generated: the meaning of happiness, connections, mindset, pleasure, health, faith, wealth, and work. Our results showed that happiness is possible at the end of life. Happiness can coexist with pain and suffering. Social connections were the most important element of happiness at the end of life. Wealth and work were given the least emphasis. From the descriptions of our patients, we recognized a tendency for the degree of importance to shift from the hedonic happiness to eudaimonic happiness as patients experienced a terminal illness. Significance of results To increase the happiness of palliative care patients, it is crucial to assess the meaning of happiness for each patient and the degree of importance for each happiness domain to allow targeted interventions.

scholarly journals General practitioners’ perceptions of best practice care at the end of life: a qualitative study

BJGP Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. bjgpopen19X101660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Herrmann ◽  
Mariko Carey ◽  
Alison Zucca ◽  
Lucy Boyd ◽  
Bernadette Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Natural Extension ◽  
Family Needs ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Practice Care

BackgroundGPs can play a central role in palliative care delivery. However, little is known about their views on what constitutes best practice care at the end of life.AimTo explore, in a sample of Australian GPs, their perceptions of best practice palliative care and their ideal role in its delivery.Design & settingA qualitative interview study of 25 GPs practising in metropolitan and non-metropolitan locations in New South Wales, Australia.MethodSemi-structured telephone interviews were conducted. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.ResultsParticipants had a mean age of 51 years, and had practised between 3 and 38 years (mean 19 years). Best practice palliative care was perceived to be proactive and responsive to a wide range of patient and family needs. Many participants indicated a need for relational continuity, which involves GPs establishing a care pathway from diagnosis to palliation, coordinating care across the pathway, and collaborating with other healthcare providers. A number of participants perceived palliative care as a natural extension of primary care and indicated that best practice palliative care mainly requires experiential knowledge and good communication skills, rather than specialised medical knowledge. Participants listed a number of communication strategies to offer patients and their families choice and ongoing negotiation about the recommended treatments.ConclusionThis study provides novel in-depth insights into GPs’ perceptions of best practice palliative care. Future research should further investigate the identified features of care, and whether they can maximise the outcomes of patients and their families.

scholarly journals Information sharing challenges in end-of-life care: a qualitative study of patient, family and professional perspectives on the potential of an Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination System

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e037483
Author(s):  
Holly Standing ◽  
Rebecca Patterson ◽  
Mark Lee ◽  
Sonia Michelle Dalkin ◽  
Monique Lhussier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Information Sharing ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Health And Social Care

ObjectivesTo explore current challenges in interdisciplinary management of end-of-life care in the community and the potential of an Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination System (EPaCCS) to facilitate the delivery of care that meets patient preferences.DesignQualitative study using interviews and focus groups.SettingHealth and Social Care Services in the North of England.Participants71 participants, 62 health and social care professionals, 9 patients and family members.ResultsFour key themes were identified: information sharing challenges; information sharing systems; perceived benefits of an EPaCCS and barriers to use and requirements for an EPaCCS. Challenges in sharing information were a source of frustration for health and social care professionals as well as patients, and were suggested to result in inappropriate hospital admissions. Current systems were perceived by participants to not work well—paper advance care planning (ACP) documentation was often unavailable or inaccessible, meaning it could not be used to inform decision-making at the point of care. Participants acknowledged the benefits of an EPaCCS to facilitate information sharing; however, they also raised concerns about confidentiality, and availability of the increased time and resources required to access and maintain such a system.ConclusionsEPaCCS offer a potential solution to information sharing challenges in end-of-life care. However, our findings suggest that there are issues in the initiation and documentation of end-of-life discussions that must be addressed through investment in training in order to ensure that there is sufficient information regarding ACP to populate the system. There is a need for further qualitative research evaluating use of an EPaCCS, which explores benefits and challenges, uptake and reasons for disparities in use to better understand the potential utility and implications of such systems.

Impact of palliative care on end-of-life management of cancer patients dying in the hospital.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20613-e20613
Author(s):  
Syed Mustafa Karim ◽  
Jamal M Zekri ◽  
Ehab Mosaad Abdelghany ◽  
Azhar Rizvi ◽  
Aboelkhair Al-Gahmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Time Of Death ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Eol Care

e20613 Background: A substantial number of cancer patients receive inpatient care at the end-of-life (EoL). Involvement of palliative care teams during the course of cancer treatment has been shown to improve quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients. In this study, we compare the EoL care of cancer patients dying in the hospital under medical oncology (MO) and palliative care (PC) services. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records of adult cancer patients who received chemotherapy during their illness and died in our hospital between January 2010 and January 2012 was conducted. The quality metrics measured as endpoints were: chemotherapy given within 21 days of death, death in the ICU, CPR at time of death, and time from last chemotherapy to death (TLCD). These endpoints were compared between patients who died under the MO service (cohort A) and those dying under PC service (cohort B). Chi-square test and T-test were used to compare the endpoints between the two cohorts. Results: Of the 106 cancer patients who died in the hospital, 40 and 66 were in cohorts A and B respectively. 30% of all patients were 65 years of age or older, and were equally distributed between the two cohorts. Patients in cohort A were more likely to receive chemotherapy within last 3 weeks of life (27.5% versus 7.5%, p=0.012, 95% CI 4.16-37.15), to have CPR at time of death (15% versus 0%, p=0.005, 95% CI 4.2-29.8) and to die in the ICU (52.5% versus 1.5%, p=<0.001, 95% CI 33.3-67.1) as compared to patients in cohort B. The average time from last chemotherapy to death was significantly longer (221 days) for cohort B patients as compared to cohort A patients (96 days), p=0.01. Patients in cohort A who had PC consultation during their hospitalization had no differences in the measured endpoints when compared to patients in cohort B. Conclusions: Cancer patients who die in the hospital while under MO service without PC involvement tend to have more aggressive EoL care. This may impact negatively on some QoL features. Early referral to palliative care services may facilitate better understanding and fulfillment of the needs of cancer patients and their caregivers by the healthcare-providers.

End-of-life characteristics and palliative care provision for elderly patients suffering from acute myeloid leukemia

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hon-Wai Benjamin Cheng ◽  
Cho-Wing Li ◽  
Kwok-Ying Chan ◽  
Ho-Yan Au ◽  
Pan-Fong Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Care Provision ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals Palliative care in the context of immune and targeted therapies: A qualitative study of bereaved carers’ experiences in metastatic melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1351-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A Fox ◽  
John Rosenberg ◽  
Stuart Ekberg ◽  
Danette Langbecker
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Family Needs ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Treatment Paradigm

Background: Immune and targeted therapies continue to transform treatment outcomes for those with metastatic melanoma. However, the role of palliative care within this treatment paradigm is not well understood. Aim: To explore bereaved carers’ experiences of immune and targeted therapy treatment options towards end of life for patients with metastatic melanoma. Design: An interpretive, qualitative study using a social constructivist framework was utilised. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using grounded theory methods. Setting/participants: Participants ( n = 20) were bereaved carers of patients who had received some form of immune and/or targeted therapy at one of three Australian metropolitan melanoma treatment centres. Results: Carers struggled to reconcile the positive discourse around the success of immune and targeted therapies in achieving long-term disease control, and the underlying uncertainty in predicting individual responses to therapy. Expectations that immune and targeted therapies necessarily provide longer-term survival were evident. Difficulty in prognostication due to clinical uncertainty and a desire to maintain hope resulted in lack of preparedness for treatment failure and end of life. Conclusion: Immune and targeted therapies have resulted in increased prognostic challenges. There is a need to engage, educate and support patients and carers to prepare and plan amid these challenges. Educational initiatives must focus on improving communication between patients, carers and clinicians; the differences between palliative and end-of-life care; and increased competency of clinicians in having goals-of-care discussions. Clinicians must recognise and communicate the benefit of collaborative palliative care to meet patient and family needs holistically and comprehensively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document