scholarly journals Psychological predictors of intention and avoidance of attending organized mammography screening in Norway: applying the Extended Parallel Process Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ivanova ◽  
Ingela Lundin Kvalem
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Psychological Factors ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Parallel Process ◽  
Extended Parallel Process Model ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Response Efficacy

Abstract Background Mammography screening is the main method for early detection of breast cancer in Norway. Few studies have focused on psychological determinants of both attendance and non-attendance of publicly available mammography screening programs. The aim of the current study, guided by the Extended Parallel Process Model, was to examine how psychological factors influence defensive avoidance of breast cancer screening and intention to attend mammography. Methods Cross-sectional survey data from a community sample of women living in Norway aged ≥ 18 (N = 270), and without a history of breast cancer, was collected from September 2018 to June 2019 and used to investigate the relationships between the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) constructs and two outcomes: defensive avoidance of breast cancer screening and intention to attend mammography within the next two years. After adjusting for confounding factors, the hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses was conducted to assess the ability of the independent variables based on the EPPM to predict the two outcome variables. Significance level was chosen at p < 0.05. Results Multivariate analyses showed that defensive avoidance of breast cancer screening was predicted by lower perceived susceptibility to breast cancer (β =  − 0.22, p = 0.001), lower response efficacy of mammography screening (β =  − 0.33, p = 0.001), higher breast cancer fear (β = 0.15, p = 0.014), and checking breasts for lumps (β =  − 0.23, p = 0.001). Intention to attend mammography within the next two years was predicted by higher response efficacy of mammography screening (β = 0.13, p = 0.032), having a lower educational level (β =  − 0.10, p = 0.041), and regular previous mammography attendance compared to never attending (β = 0.49, p = 0.001). Conclusions The study revealed that defensive avoidance of breast cancer screening and intention to attend mammography were not predicted by the same pattern of psychological factors. Our findings suggest future health promotion campaigns need to focus not only on the psychological factors that encourage women’s decision to attend the screening, but also to counter factors that contribute to women’s decision to avoid it.

scholarly journals Barriers to Mammography Screening in Nigeria: A Survey of Two Communities With Different Access to Screening Facilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 31s-31s
Author(s):  
Olalekan Olasehinde ◽  
Olusegun I. Alatise ◽  
Olukayode A. Arowolo ◽  
Victoria L. Mango ◽  
Olalere S. Olajide ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Local Government ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Delayed Presentation ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Screening Practices

Purpose Breast cancer outcomes are poor in most low- and middle-income countries. This is a result, in part, of delayed presentation. Critical to improving this gloomy picture is the promotion of breast cancer screening programs; however, designing a formidable screening program requires obtaining necessary background data. This survey evaluates breast cancer screening practices and barriers in two Nigerian communities with different geographic access to screening facilities. Methods We administered a 35-item questionnaire to women age 40 years and older—1,169 participants (52.6%) in the Ife Central Local Government, where mammography services are offered, and 1,053 (47.4%) in the Iwo Local Government, where there are no mammography units. Information on breast cancer screening practices and barriers to mammography screening were compared between the two communities. Results Most women had heard of breast cancer (Ife, 94%; Iwo, 97%), but few have had any form of breast cancer screening recommended to them—37.7% of Ife respondents and 36.6% of Iwo respondents. Few women were aware of mammography (Ife, 11.8%; Iwo, 11.4%), whereas mammography uptake was 2.8% Ife respondents and 1.8% in Iwo respondents, despite the latter offering mammography services. Awareness and practice of mammography were not statistically different between the two communities ( P = .74 and P = .1 for Ife and Iwo, respectively). Lack of awareness was the most common reason cited for not undergoing mammography in both communities. Cost was also identified as a barrier, as only 20% of respondents could afford mammography. Despite being offered at little or no cost, uptake of clinical breast examination (CBE) was poor in both communities—27.4% in Iwo and 19.7% in Ife; however, the majority were willing to participate in a routine CBE-based breast cancer screening program. Conclusion Access without awareness and community mobilization does not guarantee use of breast cancer screening services. Given the above findings, a comprehensive breast health program that incorporates awareness creation, routine CBE-based screening, and selective mammography is currently underway in a selected Nigerian community. AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No COIs from the author

scholarly journals Telemammography for breast cancer screening: a cost-effective approach in Argentina

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e100351
Author(s):  
Victoria Alba Malek Pascha ◽  
Li Sun ◽  
Ramiro Gilardino ◽  
Rosa Legood
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Access To Healthcare ◽  
Over 40 Years ◽  
Improve Access

ObjectivesArgentina is a low and middle-income country (LMIC) with a highly fragmented healthcare system that conflicts with access to healthcare stated by the country’s Universal Health Coverage plan. A tele-mammography network could improve access to breast cancer screening decreasing its mortality. This research aims to conduct an economic evaluation of the implementation of a tele-mammography program to improve access to healthcare.MethodsA cost-utility analysis was performed to explore the incremental benefit of annual tele-mammography screening for at-risk Argentinian women over 40 years old. A Markov model was developed to simulate annual mammography or tele-mammography screening in two hypothetical population-based cohorts of asymptomatic women. Parameter uncertainty was evaluated through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Model structure uncertainty was also explored to test the robustness of the results.ResultsIt was estimated that 31 out of 100 new cases of breast cancer would be detected by mammography and 39/100 by tele-mammography. The model returned an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £26 051/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) which is lower than the WHO-recommended threshold of £26 288/QALY for Argentina. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed the ICER is most sensitive to the uptake and sensitivity of the screening tests. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed tele-mammography is cost-effective in 59% of simulations.DiscussionTele-mammography should be considered for adoption as it could improve access to expertise in underserved areas where adherence to screening protocols is poor. Disaggregated data by province is needed for a better- informed policy decision. Telemedicine could also be beneficial in ensuring the continuity of care when health systems are under stress like in the current COVID-19 pandemic.ConclusionThere is a 59% chance that tele-mammography is cost-effective compared to mammography for at-risk Argentinian women over 40- years old, and should be adopted to improve access to healthcare in underserved areas of the country.

scholarly journals A limited review of over diagnosis methods and long-term effects in breast cancer screening

2011 ◽  
pp. 143-147
Author(s):  
Dongfeng Wu ◽  
Adriana Pérez
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Critical Issue ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Probability Modeling

Breast cancer screening programs have been effective in detecting tumors prior to symptoms. Recently, there has been concern over the issue of over-diagnosis, that is, diagnosis of a breast cancer that does not manifest prior to death. Estimates for over-diagnosis vary, ranging from 7 to 52%. This variability may be due partially to issues associated with bias and/or incorrect inferences associated with the lack of probability modeling. A critical issue is how to evaluate the long-term effects due to continued screening. Participants in a periodic screening program can be classified into four mutually exclusive groups depending on whether individuals are diagnosed and whether their symptoms appear prior to death: True-earlydetection; No-early-detection; Over-diagnosis; and Not-sonecessary. All initially superficially healthy people will eventually fall into one of these four categories. This manuscript reviews the major methodologies associated with the over-diagnosis and long-term effects of breast cancer screening.

Access to Breast Cancer Screening Programs for Women with Disabilities

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 1609-1619
Author(s):  
Renée Proulx ◽  
Céline Mercier ◽  
Fanny Lemétayer ◽  
Sylvie Jutras ◽  
Diane Major
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Women With Disabilities ◽  
Screening Programs

scholarly journals Linking Reminders and Physician Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Results From a National Survey

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Siembida ◽  
Archana Radhakrishnan ◽  
Sarah A. Nowak ◽  
Andrew M. Parker ◽  
Craig Evan Pollack
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
National Sample ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Practice Characteristics

Purpose Physician reminders have successfully increased rates of mammography. However, considering recent changes to breast cancer screening guidelines that disagree on the optimal age to start and stop mammography screening, we sought to examine the extent to which reminders have been deployed for breast cancer screening targeting younger and older patients. Methods A mailed survey was sent to a national sample of 2,000 primary care physicians between May and September 2016. Physicians were asked whether they received reminders to screen women in various age groups (40 to 44, 45 to 49, and ≥ 75 years), the organizational screening guidelines they trusted most, and whether they recommended routine breast cancer screening to average-risk women in the different age groups. Using regression models, we assessed the association between reminders and physician screening recommendations, controlling for physician and practice characteristics, and evaluated whether the association varied by the guidelines they trusted. Results A total of 871 physicians responded (adjusted response rate, 52.3%). Overall, 28.9% of physicians reported receiving reminders for patient ages 40 to 44 years, 32.5% for patient ages 45 to 49 years, and 16.5% for patient ages ≥ 75 years. Receiving reminders significantly increased the likelihood of physicians recommending mammography screening. In adjusted analyses, 84% (95% CI, 77% to 90%) of physicians who received reminders recommended screening for women ages ≥ 75 versus 65% (95% CI, 62% to 69%) of those who did not receive reminders. The associations between reminders and screening recommendations remained consistent regardless of which guidelines physicians reported trusting. Conclusion Reminders were significantly associated with increases in physician screening recommendations for mammography, underscoring the need for careful implementation in scenarios where guidelines are discordant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document