scholarly journals Discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students’ use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Solarte ◽  
Karen D. Könings
2019 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 63-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Ayaad ◽  
Aladeen Alloubani ◽  
Eyad Abu ALhajaa ◽  
Mohammad Farhan ◽  
Sami Abuseif ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 129-129
Author(s):  
Gregory P. Hess

129 Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) are being increasingly adopted in part driven by reports of their positive impact on patient’s quality of care. An underlying assumption is that data recorded will be relatively complete. As a field of primary importance, this study assessed the frequency with which cancer stage was recorded within an EMR data field during a historical and recent 12-month period. A random sample of records with missing stage was assessed to identify at a qualitative level reasons that stage may be omitted. Methods: Two datasets were constructed. The first comprised of oncology EMRs from 77 practices covering 476 sites of care across 34 states from 1/1/2000-12/31/2010. The second dataset from 58 practices covering 391 sites of care across 37 states. Inclusion criteria required patients to have a valid visit (i.e., not simply ‘scheduled’) and ≥ 1 diagnosis of a primary, malignant, neoplasm (except brain or spine). All data fields utilized to record stage (stage I, II, etc.) or from which stage could be reliably derived (T, M, N fields) were defined as "recorded." Practices were not required to exist in each dataset. Recorded stage by age, gender, state, and payer type was also assessed. Results: Reasons reported for absent stage within the data field included: consult visit only, written in the progress notes, text present in a scanned report, stage X (insufficient information), continuing treatment initiated elsewhere, and missing entry error. Conclusions: A significant proportion of cancer patients may not have stage recorded in the designated, searchable, data field within an EMR. The frequency of recorded stage is increasing over time. Reasons for unpopulated stage field(s) include use of nonsearchable text entries, scanned reports, and short episodes of care. Further research is needed to validate the observations in this study, determine root causes, and employ appropriate solutions. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 111-112
Author(s):  
Elahe Gozali ◽  
Marjan Ghazisaiedi ◽  
Malihe Sadeghi ◽  
Reza Safdari

Introduction: Today, with the complexity of the process of conducting activities, the increase in diversity and the number of hospital services, and the increase in the expectations of clients - consistent with the fast technological advances - most of the hospitals in Iran have turned to mechanized systems to organize their daily activities and to register the patients' information and the care provided. One of these technologies is electronic medical records, which is known as a valuable system to evaluate patients' information in hospitals. The purpose of this paper was to examine the advantages of running electronic medical records in patient safety. Methods: This study is a review paper based on a structured review of papers published in the Google Scholar, SID, Magiran, Pubmed, and Science Direct databases (from 2007 to 2015) and the books on the benefits of implementing electronic medical records in patient safety and the related keywords. Results: Clinical information systems can have a significant effect on the quality of the outputs and patient safety. Various studies have indicated that the physicians with access to clinical guidelines and features such as computer reminders, doctors who did not have these features, presented more appropriate preventive care. Studies show that electronic medical records play a crucial role in improving the quality of patient health and safety services. Moreover, electronic medical record system is usually in connection with other technological tools: electronic drug management records,  electronic record of time and date of drug management are usually associated with bar code technology. Among the benefits of this system is the possibility to record clinical care by the treatment team, which would be especially beneficial for patient's bedside record. If the treatment personnel forgets to ask the patient a particular question, system reminds him/her. Furthermore, electronic medical record is able to remind the nurses of the patient's allergic reactions and medical history without the need for the patient to remind, which improves patient safety. Conclusion: Implementation of electronic medical records boosts up the quality of health services, patient safety, people's access to health care services, and the speed of patients treatment, leading to lower healthcare costs. Thus, considering the benefits mentioned and some other benefits of this kind, one can use this technology in clinical care provided to patients to come up with a safe and effective clinical care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Bernardo ◽  
David Gonzalez-Chica ◽  
Jackie Roseleur ◽  
Luke Grzeskowiak ◽  
Nigel Stocks

Abstract Focus and outcomes for participants Modern technologies offer innovative ways of monitoring health outcomes. Electronic medical records (EMRs) stored in primary care databases provide comprehensive data on infectious and chronic conditions such as diagnosis, medications prescribed, vaccinations, laboratory results, and clinical assessments. Moreover, they allow the possibility of creating a retrospective cohort that can be tracked over time. This rich source of data can be used to generate results that support health policymakers to improve access, reduce health costs, and increase the quality of care. The symposium will discuss the use and future of routinely-collected EMR databases in monitoring health outcomes, using as an example studies based on the MedicineInsight program, a large general practice Australian database including more than 3.5 million patients. This symposium welcomes epidemiologists, researchers and health policymakers who are interested in primary care settings, big data analysis, and artificial intelligence. Rationale for the symposium, including for its inclusion in the Congress EMRs are becoming an important tool for monitoring health outcomes in different high-income countries and settings. However, most countries lack a national primary care database collating EMRs for research purposes. Monitoring of population health conditions is usually performed through surveys, surveillance systems, or census that tend to be expensive or performed over longer time intervals. In contrast, EMR databases are a useful and low-cost method to monitor health outcomes and have shown consistent results compared to other data sources. Although these databases only include individuals attending primary health settings, they tend to resemble the sociodemographic distribution from census data, as in countries such as Australia up to 90% of the population visit these services annually. Results from primary care-based EMRs can be used to inform practices and improve health policies. Analysis from EMRs can be used to identify, for example, those with undiagnosed medical conditions or patients who have not received recommended screenings or immunisations, therefore assessing the impact of government programmes. At a practice-level, healthcare staff can have better access to comprehensive patient histories, improving monitoring of people with certain conditions, such as chronic cardiac, respiratory, metabolic, neurological, or immunological diseases. This information provides feedback to primary care providers about the quality of their care and might help them develop targeted strategies for the most-needed areas or groups. Another benefit of EMRs is the possibility of using statistical modelling and machine learning to improve prediction of health outcomes and medical management, supporting general practitioners with decision making on the best management approach. In Australia, the MedicineInsight program is a large general practice database that since 2011 has been routinely collecting information from over 650 general practices varying in size, billing methods, and type of services offered, and from all Australian states and regions. In the last few years, diverse researchers have used MedicineInsight to investigate infectious and chronic diseases, immunization coverage, prescribed medications, medical management, and temporal trends in primary care. Despite being initially created for monitoring how medicines and medical tests are used, MedicineInsight has overcome some of the legal, ethical, social and resource-related barriers associated with the use of EMRs for research purposes through the involvement of a data governance committee responsible for the ethical, privacy and security aspects of any research using this data, and through applying data quality criteria to their data extraction. This symposium will discuss advances in the use of primary care databases for monitoring health outcomes using as an example the research activities performed based on the Australian MedicineInsight program. These discussions will also cover challenges in the use of this database and possible methodological innovations, such as statistical modelling or machine learning, that could be used to improve monitoring of the epidemiology and management of health conditions. Presentation program The use of large general practice databases for monitoring health outcomes in Australia: infectious and chronic conditions (Professor Nigel Stocks) How routinely collected electronic health records from MedicineInsight can help inform policy, research and health systems to improve health outcomes (Ms Rachel Hayhurst) Influenza-like illness in Australia: how can we improve surveillance systems in Australia using electronic medical records? (Dr Carla Bernardo) Long term use of opioids in Australian general practice (Dr David Gonzalez) Using routinely collected electronic health records to evaluate Quality Use of Medicines for women’s reproductive health (Dr Luke Grzeskowiak) The use of electronic medical records and machine learning to identify hypertensive patients and factors associated with controlled hypertension (Ms Jackie Roseleur) Names of presenters Professor Nigel Stocks, The University of Adelaide Ms Rachel Hayhurst, NPS MedicineWise Dr Carla Bernardo, The University of Adelaide Dr David Gonzalez-Chica, The University of Adelaide Dr Luke Grzeskowiak, The University of Adelaide Ms Jackie Roseleur, The University of Adelaide


Author(s):  
Andrew Georgiou

This chapter reviews what is currently known about the effect of the Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) on aspects of laboratory test ordering, their impact on laboratory efficiency, and the contribution this makes to the quality of patient care. The EMR can be defined as a functioning electronic database within a given organisation that contains patient information. Although laboratory services are expected to gain from the introduction of the EMRs, the evidence to date has highlighted many challenges associated with the implementation of EMRs, including their potential to cause major shifts in responsibilities, work processes, and practices. The chapter outlines an organisational communication framework that has been derived from empirical evidence. This framework considers the interplay between communication, temporal, and organisational factors, as a way to help health information technology designers, clinicians, and hospital and laboratory professionals meet the important challenges associated with EMR design, implementation, and sustainability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document