scholarly journals Virtual patients reflecting the clinical reality of primary care – a useful tool to improve cultural competence

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Rothlind ◽  
Uno Fors ◽  
Helena Salminen ◽  
Per Wändell ◽  
Solvig Ekblad
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Cultural Competence ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Virtual Patient ◽  
Virtual Patients ◽  
Informal Curriculum ◽  
Clinical Scenarios

Abstract Background Virtual patients are educational tools that may be described as case-based interactive computer simulations of clinical scenarios. In terms of learning outcomes, improved clinical reasoning skills and knowledge acquisition have been shown. For further exploring the role of virtual patients in medical education, a greater focus on context-specific cases, combined with suitable educational activities, has been suggested. A knowledge gap has been identified in cultural competence in primary care. As primary care physicians are often the main medical providers for patients with refugee backgrounds, they would probably benefit from improved training focusing on how to apply cultural competence in everyday work. Using virtual patient cases, as a complement to clinical training, may be one way forward. The aim of this study was therefore to explore a learner perspective on the educational use of a virtual patient system designed to contribute to training in cultural competence in a primary care context. Methods Three virtual patient cases portraying patients with refugee backgrounds were developed. The cases addressed various issues and symptoms common in primary care consultations, while also incorporating intercultural aspects. The system also provided the informants with individualized feedback. Primary care physicians and medical students were invited to test the cases and participate in an interview about their experience. Data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results The analysis generated the theme Virtual patients might help improve cultural competence in physicians and medical students by complementing knowledge gained through the informal curriculum. Informants at different educational levels found it suitable as a tool for introducing the topic and for reflecting on one’s own consultations. It could also compensate for the predominant informal manner of learning cultural competence, described by the informants. Conclusions Virtual patients could be useful for gaining cultural competence in a primary care context. Advantages that could benefit learners at both pre- and post-graduate levels are decreased dependence on the informal curriculum and being presented with an illustrative way of how cultural competence may be applied in the consultation.

High frequency of otolaryngology/ENT encounters in Canadian primary care despite low medical undergraduate

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan Sorichetti ◽  
Julie Pauwels ◽  
Thomas Jacobs ◽  
Neil Chadha ◽  
Emelie Kozak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Symptom Presentation ◽  
Undergraduate Medical Students ◽  
Related Symptom ◽  
Medical Undergraduate

Otolaryngology involves the treatment of patients with diseases and disorders of the ear, nose, throat (ENT), and related structures of the head and neck. Many medical students in Canada have limited experiences in ENT and a vast majority of these students go on to pursue a career as primary care physicians. Physicians at a primary care facility classified patient’s visits as either being “ENT” related or not, to assess the amount of ENT related concerns they typically encounter. The data was collected separately in the summer and winter months to assess any seasonal variability. One in eight patient encounters presented with an ENT related concern. The percentage of ENT related symptom presentation visits in the pediatric population for both data collection periods (29%) was more than three times that of the adult population (9%). The rate of ENT symptom presentation in both adult and pediatric populations was not affected by seasonality. Primary care physicians will encounter new patients presenting with ENT related concerns quite frequently. This is especially true in the pediatric patient population. Increased ENT medical education is both necessary and essential for undergraduate medical students, residents, and primary care physicians.

Establishment of Primary Care Continuity Experiences in Community Pediatricians' Offices: Nuts and Bolts

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 1185-1189
Author(s):  
Janice R. Sargent ◽  
Lucy M. Osborn ◽  
Kenneth B. Roberts ◽  
Thomas G. DeWitt
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Professional Education ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Clinical Teaching ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Ambulatory Training ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Tertiary Care Centers

During the past 30 years, there has been an increasing awareness of the importance of ambulatory care training in medical education. The discrepancy between education and practice was pointed out in the General Professional Education Panel report that indicated training was based largely in hospital settings even though the vast majority of doctor-patient encounters do not result in hospitalization.1 Perkoff,2 noting changes in hospital care such as shorter lengths of stay, increased outpatient care, and the need for well-trained primary care physicians, stated that programs need to make a major effort to emphasize clinical teaching in outpatient settings. Recognizing the need for these changes, the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has increased dramatically the requirement in primary care specialties for clinical ambulatory training.3 For pediatrics, these requirements have progressed from the suggestion that clinical training should be obtained in outpatient clinics (1961) to requiring clinical training in primary care clinics weekly for 3 years (1985). The problems in providing good training in ambulatory settings have been well described.2-4 In comparison inpatient teaching, training students and residents in an outpatient clinic is inefficient and costly. One of the methods suggested to address these problems has been to move ambulatory training out of tertiary care centers to community sites.5-9 Many pediatric programs are now using community sites for at least a portion of resident education.10 Alpert et al10 and Greenberg et al,11 although encouraging the use of these sites to reduce the gap between pediatric education and the service delivery system, pointed out that there are no standards for use of community sites.

scholarly journals Primary Care Tracks in Medical Schools

PRiMER ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maribeth P. Williams ◽  
Denny Fe Agana ◽  
Benjamin J. Rooks ◽  
Grant Harrell ◽  
Rosemary A. Klassen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Medical Schools ◽  
Clerkship Director ◽  
Medicine Clerkship ◽  
Faculty Mentorship

Introduction: With the estimated future shortage of primary care physicians there is a need to recruit more medical students into family medicine. Longitudinal programs or primary care tracks in medical schools have been shown to successfully recruit students into primary care. The aim of this study was to examine the characteristics of primary care tracks in departments of family medicine.  Methods: Data were collected as part of the 2016 CERA Family Medicine Clerkship Director Survey. The survey included questions regarding the presence and description of available primary care tracks as well as the clerkship director’s perception of impact. The survey was distributed via email to 125 US and 16 Canadian family medicine clerkship directors.  Results: The response rate was 86%. Thirty-five respondents (29%) reported offering a longitudinal primary care track. The majority of tracks select students on a competitive basis, are directed by family medicine educators, and include a wide variety of activities. Longitudinal experience in primary care ambulatory settings and primary care faculty mentorship were the most common activities. Almost 70% of clerkship directors believe there is a positive impact on students entering primary care.  Conclusions: The current tracks are diverse in what they offer and could be tailored to the missions of individual medical schools. The majority of clerkship directors reported that they do have a positive impact on students entering primary care.

scholarly journals Teaching Skin Cancer Detection to Medical Students Using a Dermoscopic Algorithm

PRiMER ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peggy R. Cyr ◽  
Wendy Craig ◽  
Hadjh Ahrns ◽  
Kathryn Stevens ◽  
Caroline Wight ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Family Physicians ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Posttest Score ◽  
Malignant Skin ◽  
Attending Physicians

Introduction: Early detection of melanoma skin cancer improves survival rates. Training family physicians in dermoscopy with the triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm (TADA) has high sensitivity and specificity for identifying malignant skin neoplasms. In this study we evaluated the effectiveness of TADA training among medical students, compared with practicing clinicians. Methods: We incorporated the TADA framework into 90-minute workshops that taught dermoscopy to family physicians, primary care residents, and first- and second-year medical students. The workshop reviewed the clinical and dermoscopic features of benign and malignant skin lesions and included a hands-on interactive session using a dermatoscope. All participants took a 30-image pretest and a different 30-image posttest. Results: Forty-six attending physicians, 25 residents, and 48 medical students participated in the workshop. Mean pretest scores were 20.1, 20.3, and 15.8 for attending physicians, resident physicians and students, respectively (P<.001); mean posttest scores were 24.5, 25.9, and 24.1, respectively (P=.11). Pre/posttest score differences were significant (P<.001) for all groups. The medical students showed the most gain in their pretest and posttest scores. Conclusion: After short dermoscopy workshop, medical students perform as well as trained physicians in identifying images of malignant skin lesions. Dermoscopy training may be a valuable addition to the medical school curriculum as this skill can be used by primary care physicians as well as multiple specialists including dermatologists, gynecologists, otolaryngologists, plastic surgeons, and ophthalmologists, who often encounter patients with concerning skin lesions.

scholarly journals Impact of a Primary Care Focused Regional Medical Campus on Recruitment into Primary Care Residencies

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Davis ◽  
Stoney Abercrombie ◽  
Nathan Bradford
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
University Of South Carolina ◽  
Hospital System ◽  
Non Profit ◽  
Regional Medical ◽  
College Of Osteopathic Medicine ◽  
Medical University

AnMed Health is a community based, non-profit hospital system in Anderson, South Carolina with a single residency in Family Medicine. In July 2014, a class of twelve third year medical students associated with Medical University of South Carolina-Charleston (MUSC-C) and Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Carolinas Campus (VCOM-CC) began their clinical training at AnMed. Since that time, 48 medical students have completed their clinical training at AnMed Health, and 75% of them have entered primary care residencies.

scholarly journals Exploring perception and usage of narrative medicine by physician specialty: a qualitative analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Fox ◽  
Joshua M. Hauser
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Time Management ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Narrative Medicine ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Specialties ◽  
General Internists

Abstract Background Narrative medicine is a well-recognized and respected approach to care. It is now found in medical school curricula and widely implemented in practice. However, there has been no analysis of the perception and usage of narrative medicine across different medical specialties and whether there may be unique recommendations for implementation based upon specialty. The aims of this study were to explore these gaps in research. Methods Fifteen senior physicians who specialize in internal medicine, pediatrics, or surgery (5 physicians from each specialty) were interviewed in a semi-structured format about the utilization, benefits, drawbacks (i.e., negative consequences), and roles pertaining to narrative medicine. Qualitative content analysis of each interview was then performed. Results Three themes emerged from our analysis: roles, practice, and outcomes. Through these themes we examined the importance, utilization, barriers, benefits, and drawbacks of narrative medicine. There was consensus that narrative medicine is an important tool in primary care. Primary care physicians (general internists and general pediatricians) also believed that narrative medicine is not as important for non-primary care providers. However, non-primary care providers (surgeons) generally believed narrative medicine is valuable in their practice as well. Within specialties, providers’ choice of language varied when trying to obtain patients’ narratives, but choice in when to practice narrative medicine did not differ greatly. Among specialties, there was more variability regarding when to practice narrative medicine and what barriers were present. Primary care physicians primarily described barriers to eliciting a patient’s narrative to involve trust and emotional readiness, while surgeons primarily described factors involving logistics and patient data as barriers to obtaining patients’ narratives. There was broad agreement among specialties regarding the benefits and drawbacks of narrative medicine. Conclusions This study sheds light on the shared and unique beliefs in different specialties about narrative medicine. It prompts important discussion around topics such as the stereotypes physicians may hold about their peers and concerns about time management. These data provide some possible ideas for crafting narrative medicine education specific to specialties as well as future directions of study.

scholarly journals UNDERSTANDING OSTEOPOROSIS SCREENING PRACTICES IN MEN: A NATIONWIDE PHYSICIAN SURVEY

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1237-1243
Author(s):  
Palak Choksi ◽  
Brittany L. Gay ◽  
David Reyes-Gastelum ◽  
Megan R. Haymart ◽  
Maria Papaleontiou
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Menopausal Woman ◽  
Significant Past Medical History ◽  
Endocrine Society ◽  
Osteoporosis Screening ◽  
Screening Practices ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
History Of

Objective: To understand osteoporosis screening practices, particularly in men, by a diverse cohort of physicians, including primary care physicians, endocrinologists, and geriatricians. Methods: We surveyed randomly selected members of the American Academy of Family Practice, Endocrine Society, and American Geriatrics Society. Respondents were asked to rate how often they would screen for osteoporosis in four different clinical scenarios by ordering a bone density scan. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with offering osteoporosis screening in men in each clinical scenario. Physicians were also asked to note factors that would lead to osteoporosis screening in men. Results: Response rate was 63% (359/566). While 90% respondents reported that they would always or frequently screen for osteoporosis in a 65-year-old post-menopausal woman, only 22% reported they would screen a 74-year-old man with no significant past medical history. Endocrinologists were more likely to screen a 74-year-old man compared to primary care physicians (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 4.88). In addition to chronic steroid use (94%), history of nontraumatic fractures (88%), and androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer (82%), more than half the physicians reported suppressive doses of thyroid hormone (64%) and history of falls (52%) as factors leading to screening for osteoporosis in men. Conclusion: Our survey results highlight heterogeneity in osteoporosis screening in men, with underscreening in some scenarios compared to women, and identify factors that lead to screening in men. These findings can help design interventions to improve osteoporosis screening in men. Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document