scholarly journals Ten-year cardiovascular risk in diabetes patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: a retrospective Western Denmark cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen ◽  
Morten Madsen ◽  
Christine Gyldenkerne ◽  
Pernille Gro Thrane ◽  
Troels Thim ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Diabetes patients without obstructive coronary artery disease as assessed by coronary angiography have a low risk of myocardial infarction, but their myocardial infarction risk may still be higher than the general population. We examined the 10-year risks of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and death in diabetes patients without obstructive coronary artery disease according to coronary angiography, compared to risks in a matched general population cohort. Methods We included all diabetes patients without obstructive coronary artery disease examined by coronary angiography from 2003 to 2016 in Western Denmark. Patients were matched by age and sex with a cohort from the Western Denmark general population without a previous myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization. Outcomes were myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and death. Ten-year cumulative incidences were computed. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) then were computed using stratified Cox regression with the general population as reference. Results We identified 5734 diabetes patients without obstructive coronary artery disease and 28,670 matched individuals from the general population. Median follow-up was 7 years. Diabetes patients without obstructive coronary artery disease had an almost similar 10-year risk of myocardial infarction (3.2% vs 2.9%, adjusted HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72–1.20) compared to the general population, but had an increased risk of ischemic stroke (5.2% vs 2.2%, adjusted HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.47-2.38) and death (29.6% vs 17.8%, adjusted HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.13–1.36). Conclusions Patients with diabetes and no obstructive coronary artery disease have a 10-year risk of myocardial infarction that is similar to that found in the general population. However, they still remain at increased risk of ischemic stroke and death.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K.K.W Olesen ◽  
M Madsen ◽  
C Gyldenkerne ◽  
P.G Thrane ◽  
T Thim ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with diabetes without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) by coronary angiography (CAG) have a risk of myocardial infarction (MI) similar to that of non-diabetes patients without CAD. Their cardiovascular risk compared to the general population is unknown. Purpose We examined the 10-year risks of myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and death in diabetes patients without CAD after CAG compared to the general population. Methods We included all diabetes patients without obstructive CAD examined by CAG from 2003–2016 in Western Denmark and an age and sex matched comparison group, sampled from the general population in Western Denmark without previous history of coronary heart disease. Outcomes were MI, ischemic stroke, and death. The 10-year cumulative incidences were estimated. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by stratified Cox regression using the general population as the reference group. Results We identified 5,760 diabetes patients without obstructive CAD and 29,139 individuals from the general population. Median follow-up was 7 years with 25% of participants followed for up to 10 years. Diabetes patients without obstructive CAD had an almost similar 10-year risk of MI (3.2% vs 2.9%, adjusted HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.70–1.17, Figure) compared to the general population cohort. Diabetes patients had an increased risk of ischemic stroke (5.2% vs 2.2%, adjusted HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.48–2.39), and death (29.7% vs 17.9%, adjusted HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.29–1.54). The duration of diabetes was associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Conclusions Absence of obstructive CAD by CAG in patients with diabetes ensures a low MI risk similar to the general population, but diabetes patients still have an increased risk of ischemic stroke and all-cause death despite absence of CAD. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital


Author(s):  
Kristina Fladseth ◽  
Haakon Lindekleiv ◽  
Christopher Nielsen ◽  
Andrea Øhrn ◽  
Andreas Kristensen ◽  
...  

Background The initial presentation to coronary angiography and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) vary greatly among patients, from ischemia with no obstructive CAD to myocardial infarction with 3‐vessel disease. Pain tolerance has been suggested as a potential mechanism for the variation in presentation of CAD. We aimed to investigate the association between pain tolerance, coronary angiography, CAD, and death. Methods and Results We identified 9576 participants in the Tromsø Study (2007–2008) who completed the cold‐pressor pain test, and had no prior history of CAD. The median follow‐up time was 10.4 years. We applied Cox‐regression models with age as time‐scale to calculate hazard ratios (HR). More women than men aborted the cold pressor test (39% versus 23%). Participants with low pain tolerance had 19% increased risk of coronary angiography (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.03–1.38]) and 22% increased risk of obstructive CAD (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.01–1.47]) adjusted by age as time‐scale and sex. Among women who underwent coronary angiography, low pain tolerance was associated with 54% increased risk of obstructive CAD (HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.09–2.18]) compared with high pain tolerance. There was no association between pain tolerance and nonobstructive CAD or clinical presentation to coronary angiography (ie, stable angina, unstable angina, and myocardial infarction). Participants with low pain tolerance had increased risk of mortality after adjustment for CAD and cardiovascular risk factors (HR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.19–1.64]). Conclusions Low cold pressor pain tolerance is associated with a higher risk of coronary angiography and death.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Gyldenkerne ◽  
Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen ◽  
Morten Madsen ◽  
Troels Thim ◽  
Lisette Okkels Jensen ◽  
...  

Objective: We examined the risk of myocardial infarction associated with glucose-lowering therapy among diabetes patients with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. Methods: A cohort of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (n = 12,030), who underwent coronary angiography from 2004 to 2012, were stratified by presence of obstructive (any stenosis ⩾50%) coronary artery disease and by type of diabetes treatment: diet, non-insulin treatment and insulin (±oral anti-diabetics). The primary endpoint was myocardial infarction. Adjusted hazard ratios were calculated using diet-treated patients without coronary artery disease as reference. Results: In patients without coronary artery disease, risk of myocardial infarction was similar in patients treated with non-insulin medication (adjusted hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.27–1.81) and insulin (adjusted hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.27–2.08) as compared to diet only. In patients with coronary artery disease, the risk of myocardial infarction was higher than in the reference group and an incremental risk was observed being lowest in patients treated with diet (adjusted hazard ratio 3.79, 95% confidence interval 1.61–8.88), followed by non-insulin medication (adjusted hazard ratio 5.42, 95% confidence interval 2.40–12.22), and highest in insulin-treated patients (adjusted hazard ratio 7.91, 95% confidence interval 3.51–17.82). Conclusion: The presence of obstructive coronary artery disease defines the risk of myocardial infarction in diabetes patients. Glucose-lowering therapy, in particular insulin, was associated with risk of myocardial infarction only in the presence of coronary artery disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K.K.W Olesen ◽  
P.G Thrane ◽  
C Gyldenkerne ◽  
T Thim ◽  
M Maeng

Abstract Background Diabetes patients have a higher risk of both ischemic stroke and dementia compared to non-diabetes patients. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. We hypothesized that diabetes and CAD are independent, and additive, risk factors for ischemic stroke and dementia. Purpose We examined the risk of dementia and ischemic stroke in diabetes and non-diabetes patients with and without CAD by coronary angiography. Methods We conducted a cohort study of all patients ≥65 years, who underwent coronary angiography between 2003–2016 in Western Denmark. Patients diagnosed with dementia or early cognitive decline at the time of CAG were excluded. Patients were stratified by diabetes and CAD. Outcomes were dementia and ischemic stroke. We estimated the cumulative incidence of a combined endpoint of dementia and ischemic stroke accounting for the competing risk of death. Follow-up was capped at the 75th percentile of overall follow-up (9.2 years). We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) using patients without diabetes and CAD as reference. We also examined the association between extent of CAD and dementia in subgroup analysis of diabetes patients. Results A total of 62,372 patients were included, of whom 10,417 (16.7%) had diabetes and 43,023 (69.0%) had obstructive CAD. Median follow-up was 5.8 years. Patients with both diabetes and CAD had the highest risk of dementia (aHR 1.47, 95% CI 1.27–1.71), including Alzheimer's dementia (aHR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01–1.56) and vascular dementia (aHR 2.60, 95% CI 1.78–3.80), as well as ischemic stroke (aHR 2.02, 95% CI 1.77–2.32). Patients with either diabetes or CAD were at intermediate risk of dementia and ischemic stroke (Figure). We did not find a significant trend between the extent of CAD and risk of dementia in diabetes patients (p for trend=0.0687). Conclusions Both diabetes and CAD were independent risk factors of dementia and ischemic stroke in patients ≥65 years after angiography. Patients with combined diabetes and CAD had a particularly high risk of cognitive impairment and ischemic stroke. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K.K.W Olesen ◽  
P.G Thrane ◽  
T Thim ◽  
M Wurtz ◽  
S.D Kristensen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Smoking increases risk of cardiovascular disease by increasing atherosclerosis and thrombogenesis. Purpose We examined the impact of smoking on cardiovascular risk in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) after coronary angiography. Methods We conducted a cohort study in patients without obstructive CAD examined by coronary angiography from 2003–2016 in Western Denmark and no previous history of MI or coronary revascularization. Smokers were compared with non-smokers (former/never smokers) and with an age- and sex matched comparison group sampled from the Western Denmark general population without a history of CAD. The main outcome was myocardial infarction (MI). Other outcomes were ischemic stroke and death. Maximum follow-up was 10 years. Adjusted hazards ratios (aHRs) were estimated using Cox regression. Results We identified 46,462 patients without obstructive CAD, of whom 10,879 (23%) were active smokers and 35,583 (77%) were non-smokers at the time of angiography. Patients were matched with 234,648 individuals from the general population with no previous MI or coronary revascularization. Median follow-up was 7.0 years. Smokers had higher risks of MI (aHR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.41–1.93), ischemic stroke (aHR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.28–1.74), and death (aHR 1.77, 95% CI: 1.67–1.87) compared to non-smokers undergoing CAG. As shown in the Figure, the MI risk increased immediately after start follow-up and the curves continued to diverge. Compared to the general population, smokers without obstructive CAD had a similar risk of MI (aHR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.83–1.10), but an increased risk of ischemic stroke (aHR 1.36, 95% CI: 1.19–1.56) and death (aHR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.41–1.56), while non-smokers had reduced risks of MI (aHR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.51–0.63), ischemic stroke (aHR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78–0.93), and death (aHR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.75–0.81). Conclusions In patients without obstructive CAD by coronary angiography, active smoking was associated with a 65% increased 10-year risk of MI compared to non-smokers, suggesting a prothrombotic effect of smoking. Compared to a general population, with unknown CAD and smoking status, smokers examined by CAG had a similar or higher risk of cardiovascular events despite the absence of CAD, while non-smokers had a lower risk. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital


Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hammadah ◽  
Naser Abdelhadi ◽  
Shuyang Fang ◽  
Zakaria Almuwaqqat ◽  
Ayman Alkhoder ◽  
...  

Background: Mental stress induced myocardial ischemia (MSIMI) is linked to increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but its mechanisms are thought to be different from those of conventional stress-induced ischemia (CSIMI). Specifically, whether MSIMI is associated with more severe underlying obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is unclear. We investigated the association between angiographically-defined CAD severity and both MSIMI and CSIMI with a hypothesis that, CAD severity will be linked to CSIMI, but not MSIMI. Methods: A total of 273 patients with stable CAD, aged 51±7 years, 49% female, who survived a myocardial infarction (MI) within the past 8 months (median 167±52 days) were enrolled in the Myocardial Infarction and Mental Stress 2 (MIMS-2) study. The coronary angiogram performed during the index MI hospitalization was used to assess CAD severity. Coronary artery obstruction was assessed by counting the number of diseased vessels with 70% stenosis (DV70%) and using the Gensini Score (GS) after correcting for revascularized vessels. Patients underwent 99mTc sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging during mental stress, using a public speaking task, and during conventional stress test, using exercise or pharmacological stress. MSIMI and CSIMI were defined as a new or worsening impairment in myocardial perfusion using a 17-segment model. Results: A total of 68 (26%) patients developed CSIMI, while 46 (17%) developed MSIMI. Median DV70% and GS were 0 (0-1), and 3 (0-12), respectively. Using logistic regression models, and after adjustment for age, gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes, obstructive CAD was associated with increased risk of CSIMI [OR(95%CI) of 1.54 (1.02 - 2.31) for DV70% and 1.25 (1.03-1.53), for GS], but not MSIMI [OR(95%CI) of 0.93 (0.56 - 1.53) for DV70%, and 0.94 (0.75-1.18) for GS]. Conclusion: Although CSIMI is linked to underlying coronary obstruction, MSIMI is independent of CAD severity among post- MI patients. Other mechanisms are likely responsible for MSIMI post MI.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2759
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Bryniarski ◽  
Pawel Gasior ◽  
Jacek Legutko ◽  
Dawid Makowicz ◽  
Anna Kedziora ◽  
...  

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is a working diagnosis for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary angiography. It is a heterogenous entity with a number of possible etiologies that can be determined through the use of appropriate diagnostic algorithms. Common causes of a MINOCA may include plaque disruption, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, coronary artery spasm, and coronary thromboembolism. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging modality which allows the differentiation of coronary tissue morphological characteristics including the identification of thin cap fibroatheroma and the differentiation between plaque rupture or erosion, due to its high resolution. In this narrative review we will discuss the role of OCT in patients presenting with MINOCA. In this group of patients OCT has been shown to reveal abnormal findings in almost half of the cases. Moreover, combining OCT with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was shown to allow the identification of most of the underlying mechanisms of MINOCA. Hence, it is recommended that both OCT and CMR can be used in patients with a working diagnosis of MINOCA. Well-designed prospective studies are needed in order to gain a better understanding of this condition and to provide optimal management while reducing morbidity and mortality in that subset patients.


Author(s):  
Martin Bahls ◽  
Michael F. Leitzmann ◽  
André Karch ◽  
Alexander Teumer ◽  
Marcus Dörr ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Observational evidence suggests that physical activity (PA) is inversely and sedentarism positively related with cardiovascular disease risk. We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to examine whether genetically predicted PA and sedentary behavior are related to coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. Methods and results We used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with self-reported moderate to vigorous PA (n = 17), accelerometer based PA (n = 7) and accelerometer fraction of accelerations > 425 milli-gravities (n = 7) as well as sedentary behavior (n = 6) in the UK Biobank as instrumental variables in a two sample MR approach to assess whether these exposures are related to coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction in the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D genome-wide association study (GWAS) or ischemic stroke in the MEGASTROKE GWAS. The study population included 42,096 cases of coronary artery disease (99,121 controls), 27,509 cases of myocardial infarction (99,121 controls), and 34,217 cases of ischemic stroke (404,630 controls). We found no associations between genetically predicted self-reported moderate to vigorous PA, accelerometer-based PA or accelerometer fraction of accelerations > 425 milli-gravities as well as sedentary behavior with coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. Conclusions These results do not support a causal relationship between PA and sedentary behavior with risk of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. Hence, previous observational studies may have been biased. Graphic abstract


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document