scholarly journals Oxygen reserve index for non-invasive early hypoxemia detection during endotracheal intubation in intensive care: the prospective observational NESOI study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Hille ◽  
Aurelie Le Thuaut ◽  
Emmanuel Canet ◽  
Jeremie Lemarie ◽  
Laura Crosby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Systolic Arterial Pressure ◽  
Preventive Action ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Single Centre Study ◽  
Oesophageal Intubation

Abstract Background To evaluate the ability of the oxygen reserve index (ORI) to predict the occurrence of mild hypoxemia (defined as SpO2  <  97%) during endotracheal intubation (ETI) of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods This observational single-centre study included patients without hypoxemia (defined as SpO2/FiO2  >  214) who required ETI in the ICU. Patients were followed during preoxygenation and ETI then until hospital discharge and/or day 28. We recorded cases of mild hypoxemia, moderate (SpO2  <  90%) and severe (SpO2  <  80%) hypoxemia, moderate arterial hypotension (systolic arterial pressure  <  90 mmHg), oesophageal intubation, aspiration, cardiac arrest, and death. Results Between January 2019 and July 2020, 56 patients were included prospectively and 51 patients were analysed. Twenty patients had mild hypoxemia between the end of preoxygenation and the end of intubation; in 10 of these patients, the decrease in SpO2 below 97% was preceded by an ORI  <  0.4, the median time difference being 81 s [interquartile range, 34–146]. By multivariable analysis, a higher ORI (by 0.1 increase) value during preoxygenation was associated with absence of hypoxemia (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.61;0.95; P  =  0.0141). Conclusion In non-hypoxemic patients, the 81-s [34–146] median time between the ORI decrease below 0.4 and the SpO2 decrease below 97% during apnoea may allow preventive action. A higher ORI value during preoxygenation was independently protective against hypoxemia. Whether these findings also apply to hypoxemic patients, and the clinical impact of a preoxygenation strategy based on ORI monitoring, remain to be evaluated prospectively. Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov, #NCT03600181.

scholarly journals Comparison of clinical features and outcomes in COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia patients requiring intensive care unit admission

Infection ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Oliva ◽  
G. Ceccarelli ◽  
C. Borrazzo ◽  
M. Ridolfi ◽  
G. D.’Ettorre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Single Centre Study ◽  
Male Sex

Abstract Background Little is known in distinguishing clinical features and outcomes between coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and influenza (FLU). Materials/methods Retrospective, single-centre study including patients with COVID-19 or FLU pneumonia admitted to the Intensive care Unit (ICU) of Policlinico Umberto I (Rome). Aims were: (1) to assess clinical features and differences of patients with COVID-19 and FLU, (2) to identify clinical and/or laboratory factors associated with FLU or COVID-19 and (3) to evaluate 30-day mortality, bacterial superinfections, thrombotic events and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in patients with FLU versus COVID-19. Results Overall, 74 patients were included (19, 25.7%, FLU and 55, 74.3%, COVID-19), median age 67 years (58–76). COVID-19 patients were more male (p = 0.013), with a lower percentage of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p = 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively) than FLU. SOFA score was higher (p = 0.020) and lymphocytes were significantly lower in FLU than in COVID-19 [395.5 vs 770.0 cells/mmc, p = 0.005]. At multivariable analysis, male sex (OR 6.1, p < 0.002), age > 65 years (OR 2.4, p = 0.024) and lymphocyte count > 725 cells/mmc at ICU admission (OR 5.1, p = 0.024) were significantly associated with COVID-19, whereas CKD and COPD were associated with FLU (OR 0.1 and OR 0.16, p = 0.020 and p < 0.001, respectively). No differences in mortality, bacterial superinfections and thrombotic events were observed, whereas IPA was mostly associated with FLU (31.5% vs 3.6%, p = 0.0029). Conclusions In critically ill patients, male sex, age > 65 years and lymphocytes > 725 cells/mmc are related to COVID-19. FLU is associated with a significantly higher risk of IPA than COVID-19.

scholarly journals Mortality Rate and Predictors among Patients with COVID-19 Related Acute Respiratory Failure Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Single Centre Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Christophe de Terwangne ◽  
Antonio Sorgente ◽  
Redente Tortora ◽  
Diana Cheung ◽  
Frederic Duprez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Morbidity Burden ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Laboratory Test Results ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Single Centre Study

Abstract Aim The objective of the study was to assess mortality rates in COVID-19 patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who also requiring mechanical ventilation. The predictors of mortality in this cohort were analysed, and the clinical characteristics recorded. Material and method A single centre retrospective study was conducted on all COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the Epicura Hospital Center, Province of Hainaut, Belgium, between March 1st and April 30th 2020. Results Forty-nine patients were included in the study of which thirty-four were male, and fifteen were female. The mean (SD) age was 68.8 (10.6) and 69.5 (12.6) for males and females, respectively. The median time to death after the onset of symptoms was eighteen days. The median time to death, after hospital admission was nine days. By the end of the thirty days follow-up, twenty-seven patients (55%) had died, and twenty–two (45%) had survived. Non-survivors, as compared to those who survived, were similar in gender, prescribed medications, COVID-19 symptoms, with similar laboratory test results. They were significantly older (p = 0.007), with a higher co-morbidity burden (p = 0.026) and underwent significantly less tra-cheostomy (p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, no parameter significantly predicted mortality. Conclusions This study reported a mortality rate of 55% in critically ill COVID-19 patients with ARDS who also required mechanical ventilation. The results corroborate previous findings that older and more comorbid patients represent the population at most risk of a poor outcome in this setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document