Selinexor in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

AbstractSelinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), was demonstrated to hinder the DNA damage repair (DDR) system by reducing DDR proteins while enhancing the killing of cancer cells by DDR-based therapeutics in vivo studies. In this single-center, multi-arm phase 1b study, selinexor with carboplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (DC), irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFIRI), irinotecan, and capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX), were employed as separate parallel arms. Eligible patients have relapsed/ metastatic refractory solid tumors following standard therapy or addition of selinexor to systemic therapy was appropriate. Nineteen patients were treated in the 5 arms. Tumor types included were colorectal (n = 3), breast (n = 3), neuroendocrine (n = 2), ovarian (n = 2), and pancreas cancers (n = 2). All patients developed one treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). The most prevalent TRAE were thrombocytopenia (84%), nausea (68%), leukopenia (68%), neutropenia (63%), and fatigue (58%). The common grade 3/4 TRAE were neutropenia (42%), leukopenia (26%), and hyponatremia (21%). Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in 3 separate arms. Fourteen patients were evaluable for response. Although no patients achieved complete or partial response (CR or PR), seven patients attained stable disease (SD). Disease control rate (DCR) was 14%. The combination of oral selinexor with different standard chemotherapies showed limited clinical activity despite toxicity and DLT prevented further dose escalation. Optimizing supportive care, the utility of growth factors, and aggressive measures on antiemetics strategies remain tangible.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495). Sponsor(s): Karyopharm Therapeutics

Download Full-text

Selinexor in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: Results of an open label, single-center, multiarm phase 1b study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5565 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 5565-5565

Author(s):

Shannon Neville Westin ◽

Siqing Fu ◽

Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou ◽

Sarina Anne Anne Piha-Paul ◽

Fechukwu Akhmedzhanov ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Solid Tumors ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Nuclear Export ◽

Nuclear Accumulation ◽

Weekly Paclitaxel ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Single Center ◽

Open Label ◽

Phase 1B

5565 Background: Selinexor is a first-in-class novel, oral potent selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) which blocks Exportin-1 (XPO1) leading to nuclear accumulation and activation of tumor suppressor proteins and prevention of translation of proto-oncogenes. Weekly paclitaxel is a standard chemotherapy regimen used in various tumor types. Preclinical models show that selinexor with paclitaxel exerts antitumor activity against multiple solid tumors. Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of selinexor and weekly paclitaxel. Methods: This was an open label, single-center, multi-arm phase 1b study utilizing a “3 + 3” design and a “basket type” expansion. Selinexor (twice weekly orally) and weekly paclitaxel (80mg IV 2 week on, 1 week off) was employed as one of 13 parallel arms. Two dose levels (DL) of selinexor were explored: DL1 selinexor 60mg; DL2 selinexor 80mg. Patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were eligible if they had adequate bone marrow and organ function. There was no limit on prior lines of therapy. Efficacy was evaluated using RECIST 1.1. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as time from treatment until disease progression or death. Results: Of 35 pts treated, all were evaluable for toxicity, and 31 (88%) were evaluable for response. Pt diagnoses included ovarian (n = 28), breast (n = 4), prostate (n = 2), and cervical (n = 1) cancer. Pts had a median of four prior therapies (range 1-10), and 47% had a prior taxane. All pts with ovarian cancer had platinum resistant/refractory disease; high grade serous histology was most common. There were no DLTs and DL1 was chosen as the RP2D given its long term tolerability. 97% of pts had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and the most common TEAEs were anemia (74%), nausea (57%), fatigue (51%), leukopenia (51%), neutropenia (49%), thrombocytopenia (46%), and vomiting (31%). The most prevalent grade ≥ 3 TEAE were neutropenia (46%), anemia (31%), leukopenia (17%), and fatigue (9 %). Partial responses (PR) were noted in 4 pts (13%); 10 pts (32%) achieved stable disease for > 4 months for a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 45%. 16 pts (47%) had prior exposure to a taxane, including 1 pt who achieved PR. Among 24 evaluable pts with ovarian cancer, response rate was 17%, CBR was 58%, and PFS was 6.83 months (95% CI 3.73, not reached (NR)). Median duration of clinical benefit in ovarian cancer was 7.57 months (95% CI: 4.43, NR). Conclusions: Oral selinexor in combination with weekly paclitaxel demonstrated promising clinical activity with manageable toxicity, and further evaluation with once weekly selinexor is warranted. This combination should be considered for further exploration in a randomized study, especially in ovarian malignancies. Clinical trial information: NCT02419495.

Download Full-text

A phase 1b/2 study of INCB039110 + nab-paclitaxel (N) and gemcitabine (G) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors and pancreatic cancer (PC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.4_suppl.362 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 362-362 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Gregory Lawrence Beatty ◽

Safi Shahda ◽

J. Thaddeus Beck ◽

Nikhil Premparkash Uppal ◽

Steven J. Cohen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Solid Tumors ◽

Cancer Progression ◽

Malignant Cell ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Induction Phase ◽

Open Label ◽

Prior Therapy ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Grade 3

362 Background: JAK-STAT activity has been associated with malignant cell proliferation and production of proinflammatory cytokines involved in cancer progression. INCB039110 is a potent and selective inhibitor of JAK1. Methods: This was a 2-part phase 1b/2 open-label study evaluating INCB039110 (300 or 400 mg QD) in combination with N and G in pts with advanced or metastatic solid tumors (Part 1 [P1], dose optimization phase) and pts with advanced or metastatic PC who had not received prior chemotherapy (Part 2 [P2] and 2A [P2A]). Pts in P2 received the MTD established in P1: INCB039110 (300 mg QD) + N (125 mg/m2 day [d] 1, 8, 15) + G (1000 mg/m2 d 1, 8, 15), 28-d cycle. For exploratory purposes, pts in P2A underwent a 7-d induction phase with INCB039110 (200 mg QD) before receiving INCB039110 (200 mg QD) + N (125 mg/m2 d 1, 8, 15) + G (1000 mg/m2d 1, 8, 15). The primary objective was to evaluate safety/tolerability. Results: 55 pts were enrolled (27 P1, 20 P2, and 8 P2A). Most patients had advanced PC (n = 46). Median age was 65 (P1), 67 (P2), and 66 years (P2A). Prior therapy: 67% in P1, 30% in P2, and 0% in P2A. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; 41% P1, 20% P2, 38% P2A), disease progression (37% P1, 45% P2, 0% P2A), and study termination by the sponsor (0% P1, 0% P2, 38% P2A). Median treatment durations were 84 d (P1), 121 d (P2), and 47 d (P2A). The most common non-hematologic AEs (all grades) were fatigue (59% P1, 75% P2, 88% P2A), nausea (41% P1, 50% P2, 38% P2A), pyrexia (37% P1, 40% P2, 13% P2A), and peripheral edema (30% P1, 50% P2, 25% P2A), with few grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic AEs. The most common grade 3 or 4 hematologic AEs (laboratory values) were neutropenia (33% P1, 60% P2, 13% P2A), lymphopenia (30% P1, 30% P2, 13% P2A), and leukopenia (30% P1, 45% P2, 0% P2A). The most common serious AEs occurring in ≥ 3 pts were pneumonia (n = 4 P1, n = 2 P2, n = 0 P2A) and anemia (n = 3 P1, n = 2 P2, n = 2 P2A). Among evaluable patients, ORR (all PRs) and DCR were 27% (13/48) and 75% (36/48), respectively. Responses were seen across INCB039110 doses. Conclusions: INCB039110 + N/G showed an acceptable safety profile in pts with advanced PC, with the combination demonstrating clinical activity. Clinical trial information: NCT01858883.

Download Full-text

A phase I study of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in refractory solid tumors

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.2531 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 2531-2531

Author(s):

J. A. Ninan ◽

H. Bailey ◽

J. Kolesar ◽

R. Marnocha ◽

J. Eickhoff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Solid Tumors ◽

Treatment Plan ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Combination Methods ◽

Starting Dose ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Subjective Evidence ◽

Tumor Types

2531 Background: Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) is an oral histone deacytlase (HDAC) inhibitor that has anti-tumor activity in hematologic malignancies and advanced solid tumors. Vorinostat has been postulated to act synergistically with bortezomib at the level of aggresome inhibition with creation of reactive oxygen species. We previously conducted a study of this combination with once-daily dosing of vorinostat with bortezomib (Step A). This study (Step B) was conducted to evaluate twice daily dosing of vorinostat during administration of bortezomib to determine safety and efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and activity this combination. Methods: This study used standard eligibility criteria except patients must have had no prior bortezomib. The treatment plan initially consisted of vorinostat given orally twice daily on days 1–14 with bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21 day cycle. Two DLTs (elevated ALT and fatigue) were observed at level 1, and the protocol was amended to administer vorinostat twice daily on days 1–4 and 8–11. Starting dose was vorinostat 200 mg and bortezomib 1 mg/m2. RECIST was used to measure response. Results: 29 pts have been enrolled; 13 men and 16 women. Tumor types include: Prostate (1), Colorectal (3), Pancreatic (6), Sarcoma (7), Biliary (1), Thymus (1), GIST (2), Mesothelioma (1), ovarian (1), Neuroendocrine (1), Lung (1), Head and Neck (1), Breast (2), and Cervical (1). Grade 3–4 toxicities possibly related to SAHA at any dose level were as follows: thrombocytopenia (5), fatigue (3), increased ALT (1), elevated INR (1), anemia, (1), hypotension (1), diarrhea (3), anorexia (1), dizziness (1), nausea/vomiting (1), and hypoalbuminemia (1). The only dose limiting toxicities included elevated ALT (1), fatigue (1). There were two deaths but neither was felt to be related to the drug. The MTD for Step B was established at vorinostat 300 mg BID and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2. Conclusions: The MTD for Step B was established at vorinostat 300 mg BID and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2. Subjective evidence of clinical activity has been observed in patients with refractory solid tumors. These studies were supported by NCI, UO1, CA062491, SAIC 25XS097, and 1ULRR025011. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Avelumab in Combination with Axitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results from the Phase 1b VEGF Liver 100 Trial

Liver Cancer ◽

10.1159/000514420 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-11

Author(s):

Masatoshi Kudo ◽

Kenta Motomura ◽

Yoshiyuki Wada ◽

Yoshitaka Inaba ◽

Yasunari Sakamoto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Group Performance ◽

Objective Response ◽

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Recist 1.1 ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Grade 3

Introduction: Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a targeted antiangiogenic agent may leverage complementary mechanisms of action for the treatment of advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Avelumab is a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 antibody with clinical activity in various tumor types; axitinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3. We report the final analysis from VEGF Liver 100 (NCT03289533), a phase 1b study evaluating safety and efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib in treatment-naive patients with aHCC. Methods: Eligible patients had confirmed aHCC, no prior systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, and Child-Pugh class A disease. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks plus axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Endpoints included safety and investigator-assessed objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) for HCC. Results: Twenty-two Japanese patients were enrolled and treated with avelumab plus axitinib. The minimum follow-up was 18 months as of October 25, 2019 (data cutoff). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 16 patients (72.7%); the most common (≥3 patients) were hypertension (n = 11 [50.0%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (n = 5 [22.7%]), and decreased appetite (n = 3 [13.6%]). No grade 4 TRAEs or treatment-related deaths occurred. Ten patients (45.5%) had an immune-related AE (irAE) of any grade; 3 patients (13.6%) had an infusion-related reaction (IRR) of any grade, and no grade ≥3 irAE and IRR were observed. The objective response rate was 13.6% (95% CI: 2.9–34.9%) per RECIST 1.1 and 31.8% (95% CI: 13.9–54.9%) per mRECIST for HCC. Conclusion: Treatment with avelumab plus axitinib was associated with a manageable toxicity profile and showed antitumor activity in patients with aHCC.

Download Full-text

Safety and clinical activity of intratumoral MEDI9197 alone and in combination with durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer ◽

10.1136/jitc-2020-001095 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. e001095 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Lillian Siu ◽

Joshua Brody ◽

Shilpa Gupta ◽

Aurélien Marabelle ◽

Antonio Jimeno ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Radiation Therapy ◽

Solid Tumors ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Objective Response ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advanced Solid Tumors ◽

Palliative Radiation ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Palliative Radiation Therapy ◽

Grade 3

BackgroundMEDI9197 is an intratumorally administered toll-like receptor 7 and 8 agonist. In mice, MEDI9197 modulated antitumor immune responses, inhibited tumor growth and increased survival. This first-time-in-human, phase 1 study evaluated MEDI9197 with or without the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced solid tumors.Patients and methodsEligible patients had at least one cutaneous, subcutaneous, or deep-seated lesion suitable for intratumoral (IT) injection. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design. Patients received IT MEDI9197 0.005–0.055 mg with or without RT (part 1), or IT MEDI9197 0.005 or 0.012 mg plus durvalumab 1500 mg intravenous with or without RT (part 3), in 4-week cycles. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and objective response based on Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors version 1.1. Exploratory endpoints included tumor and peripheral biomarkers that correlate with biological activity or predict response.ResultsFrom November 2015 to March 2018, part 1 enrolled 35 patients and part 3 enrolled 17 patients; five in part 1 and 2 in part 3 received RT. The maximum tolerated dose of MEDI9197 monotherapy was 0.037 mg, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of cytokine release syndrome in two patients (one grade 3, one grade 4) and 0.012 mg in combination with durvalumab 1500 mg with DLT of MEDI9197-related hemorrhagic shock in one patient (grade 5) following liver metastasis rupture after two cycles of MEDI9197. Across parts 1 and 3, the most frequent MEDI9197-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade were fever (56%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (21%). The most frequent MEDI9197-related grade ≥3 events were decreased lymphocytes (15%), neutrophils (10%), and white cell counts (10%). MEDI9197 increased tumoral CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells, inducing type 1 and 2 interferons and Th1 response. There were no objective clinical responses; 10 patients in part 1 and 3 patients in part 3 had stable disease ≥8 weeks.ConclusionIT MEDI9197 was feasible for subcutaneous/cutaneous lesions but AEs precluded its use in deep-seated lesions. Although no patients responded, MEDI9197 induced systemic and intratumoral immune activation, indicating potential value in combination regimens in other patient populations.Trial registration numberNCT02556463.

Download Full-text

Inducible T-cell co-stimulatory (ICOS) receptor agonist, feladilimab (fela), alone and in combination (combo) with pembrolizumab (P): Results from INDUCE-1 urothelial carcinoma (UC) expansion cohorts (ECs).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.4519 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4519-4519

Author(s):

Arjun Vasant Balar ◽

Victor Moreno ◽

Eric Angevin ◽

Hui Kong Gan ◽

Maria Vieito ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Single Agent ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Prior Therapy ◽

Metastatic Setting ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Prior Systemic Therapy ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Tumor Types

4519 Background: INDUCE-1 is a first-in-human trial evaluating fela, an IgG4 ICOS agonist non-T-cell depleting mAb, as monotherapy (mono) and in combo with P. ECs include tumor types, such as UC, with high ICOS expression and immunotherapy-favorable features. Fela induced IFNγ, increased PD-1/L1 expression, and enhanced antitumor activity in combo with PD-1 blockade nonclinically. We report preliminary efficacy, safety, and biomarker data of fela ± P in INDUCE-1 UC ECs. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had recurrent/metastatic (R/M) UC of the upper or lower urinary tract, ≤6 prior systemic therapy lines in the advanced setting, measurable disease, and no active autoimmune disease. Pts received 0.3 or 1 mg/kg fela (mono EC; anti-PD-1/L1–experienced [exp] pts) or 0.3 mg/kg fela + 200 mg P (combo EC; anti-PD-1/L1–naïve pts) every 3 wks, up to 35 cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Disease was assessed every 9 wks through wk 54, then every 12 wks. Archival and/or fresh biopsy tumor tissue was collected for biomarker analyses and safety assessed. Results: By Nov 6 2020, 13 anti-PD-1/L1–exp and 32 anti-PD-1/L1–naïve pts were evaluable in the mono and combo ECs, respectively. In the mono EC, median age was 69 yrs (range: 47–82), 92% of pts were male, and 85% received ≥2 prior therapy lines in the metastatic setting. In the combo EC, median age was 70 yrs (range: 42–84), 75% of pts were male, and 72% received ≥1 prior therapy line in the metastatic setting. In the mono EC, median duration of follow-up (mDoF) was 10.6 mo (range: 1.1–22.8); overall response rate (ORR) was 8% (1 partial response [PR]; 95% CI: 0.2, 36.0) with a duration of response (DoR) of 6.1 mo; disease control rate (DCR [response or stable disease for ≥9 wks]) was 23% (95% CI: 5.0, 53.8), and median overall survival (mOS) was 14.5 mo (95% CI: 2.8, NR), with 74% of pts alive at 6 mo. In the combo EC, mDoF was 9.6 mo (range: 0.9–28.3); ORR was 22% (7 PRs; 95% CI: 9.3, 40.0) with a median DoR of 8.3 months (range: 3.5–23.3+); DCR was 63% (95% CI: 43.7, 78.9), and mOS was 10.7 mo (95% CI: 5.2, 18.1), with 64% of pts alive at 6 mo. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were reported for 0% and 9% of pts in the mono (N = 16) and combo (N = 44) safety populations, respectively. PD-L1 expression and ICOS-specific biomarkers are being evaluated, with promising trends observed in enrichment of clinical activity in preliminary analyses. Conclusions: Fela is the first ICOS agonist with reported single-agent activity in anti-PD-1/L1–exp relapsed/refractory UC. Fela + P in combo shows promising clinical activity and manageable safety in PD-1/L1–naïve R/M UC. Further study is warranted. Updated data to be presented. Funding: Study 204691 (NCT02723955) funded by GlaxoSmithKline in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Clinical trial information: NCT02723955.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 dose escalation study of MGC018, an anti-B7-H3 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.2631 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 2631-2631

Author(s):

Sekwon Jang ◽

John D. Powderly ◽

Alexander I. Spira ◽

Ouiam Bakkacha ◽

Deryk Loo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Solid Tumors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advanced Solid Tumors ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Multiple Tumor ◽

Melanoma Patients ◽

Tumor Types

2631 Background: MGC018 is an investigational ADC with a duocarmycin payload linked to an anti-B7-H3 monoclonal antibody (mAb). B7-H3 is expressed on multiple solid tumors with limited normal tissue expression. It is hypothesized that MGC018 may exert activity against B7-H3-expressing tumors with an acceptable safety profile. Studies demonstrate that B7-H3 is a significant factor in progression and events of metastasis of multiple tumor types, including melanoma. Methods: This phase 1 study characterizes safety, maximum tolerated or maximum administered dose, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and tumor response per RECIST v1.1 of MGC018 in a 3+3+3 dose escalation design in patients with advanced solid tumors. MGC018 was administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks. Results: The study enrolled 29 patients of multiple tumor types, which included 3 melanoma patients refractory to ≥2 prior lines of checkpoint therapy. The study completed 5 of 6 planned dose cohorts (0.5 mg/kg - 4 mg/kg) as of the data cutoff of 21 January 2021. The final cohort of 4 mg/kg has 3 patients with ongoing treatment and follow-up at the date of submission. Dosing MGC018 IV every 3 weeks resulted in minimal serum accumulation. At least 1 treatment emergent adverse event occurred in 29 patients (100.0%); most common (≥25%) were anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, hyperpigmentation, infusion related reaction, nausea, and palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia. Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred; one grade 4 neutropenia (2 mg/kg) and one grade 3 fatigue lasting 7 days (4 mg/kg). No febrile neutropenia was reported. The 3 melanoma patients had reductions in target lesion sum of 24.4%, 27.5%, and 35% (unconfirmed partial response) and remain on treatment as of the data cutoff. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 3 mg/kg. Conclusions: Results to date demonstrate a manageable safety profile, with early evidence of clinical activity in pretreated metastatic melanoma. Cohort expansion is ongoing using a recommended phase 2 dose of 3 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. The planned enrollment includes advanced metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03729596.

Download Full-text

A phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study to evaluate camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) as monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.2556 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 2556-2556

Author(s):

Igor Puzanov ◽

Patricia LoRusso ◽

Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽

Christopher T. Chen ◽

Yvan LeBruchec ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antitumor Activity ◽

Solid Tumors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Single Agent ◽

Treatment Withdrawal ◽

Advanced Solid Tumors ◽

Open Label ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Grade 3

2556 Background: Depletion of tumor-infiltrating CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), which inhibit tumor-specific immune responses, could contribute to tumor eradication. Cami (ADCT-301), an anti-CD25, pyrrolobenzodiazepine-based antibody-drug conjugate, targets CD25+ Tregs. A mouse surrogate has shown potent antitumor activity in solid tumor models. Here we report preliminary data from the monotherapy arm of a phase 1b trial of Cami in pts with selected advanced solid tumors. Methods: The monotherapy dose-escalation part of this open-label study enrolled pts (aged ≥18 years) with selected advanced solid tumors and no suitable existing therapy. The primary objective was to characterize safety and tolerability, and to identify the recommended phase 2 dose of Cami monotherapy. Secondary and exploratory objectives included evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity. Pts received Cami every 3 weeks (1 cycle) with dose escalation per a 3+3 design. Disease control rate (DCR) was assessed (complete and partial responses [CR, PR] and stable disease). Results: At data cut-off (Dec 17, 2020), 44 pts were enrolled, with primary tumor types (stage IVA/B: 27 pts; 61.4%) of colorectal (15 pts; 34.1%), pancreatic (14 pts; 31.8%), head and neck, ovarian/fallopian tube, and renal cell carcinoma (all 3 pts; 6.8%), non-small cell lung cancer (2 pts; 4.5%), gastric, esophageal/GEJ, melanoma, and triple-negative breast cancer (each 1 pt; 2.3%). Median (range) age was 60.5 (33–82) years; median (range) number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (1–9). Pts received a median (range) of 2 (1–6) Cami cycles at doses of 20–150 µg/kg. Median (range) treatment duration was 22 (1–178) days. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. All-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥20% pts were nausea (18 pts; 40.9%), decreased appetite and fatigue (each 16 pts; 36.4%), constipation (13 pts; 29.5%), abdominal pain (11 pts; 25%), and rash (10 pts; 22.7%). The only Grade ≥3 TEAE in ≥10% pts was anemia (5 pts; 11.4%). Grade 3 autoimmune AEs (colitis, immune-mediated AE, systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and neurologic AEs (dysphagia and asthenia, but not GBS) were reported in 3 (6.8%) and 2 (4.5%) pts, respectively. 1 (2.3%) Cami-related TEAE led to treatment withdrawal; no Cami-related TEAEs were fatal. DCR was 25% (95% CI: 11.1, 34.7); 11/44 pts attained stable disease. No pts had CR or PR. Conclusions: Dose escalation of Cami monotherapy is complete. The safety profile is encouraging and MTD was not reached. PK/PD data will be presented. 150 µg/kg is the highest dose investigated for single-agent Cami and the highest to be investigated combined with pembrolizumab in selected advanced solid tumors in the current protocol. Funding: ADC Therapeutics SA NCT03621982. Clinical trial information: NCT03621982.

Download Full-text

A phase 1 trial of FID-007, a novel nanoparticle paclitaxel formulation, in patients with solid tumors.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3021 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 3021-3021

Author(s):

Jacob Stephen Thomas ◽

Diane Habib ◽

Diana L. Hanna ◽

Irene Kang ◽

Syma Iqbal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Solid Tumors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Topical Therapy ◽

Maculopapular Rash ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Multiple Tumor ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Tumor Types ◽

Dose Proportional

3021 Background: FID-007 (FID) consists of paclitaxel encapsulated in a polyethyloxazoline (PEOX) polymer excipient designed to enhance PK, biodistribution, and tolerability. In addition to allowing the drug to remain in solution until it can enter a cancer cell, the PEOX nanoparticle preferentially delivers paclitaxel to the tumor through the leaky hyperpermeable vasculature. In xenograft studies, FID reduced or limited tumor growth in multiple tumor types including lung, gastric, breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer. FID was more effective at lower or comparable taxane doses with fewer side effects. We present the first-in-human trial of FID. Methods: The study is evaluating the safety, PK, and efficacy of FID in pts with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective is to determine the MTD and RP2D. Pts received FID in doses between 15mg/m2 and 125mg/m2 using a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. FID was given IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Eligibility included ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function, and no more than 3 prior lines of cytotoxic therapy for advanced disease. Results: Twenty-five pts were treated across 6 dose levels. Median age was 62 (44-76). ECOG PS was 2 in 1 pt and 1 in 64%. Median number of cycles was 2 (1-16). There were 2 DLTs of grade 3 rash at 100 mg/m2. Given the transient nature of the rash and response to topical therapy, DLT definition was modified to exclude grade 3 rash that lasts ≤ 7 days and additional patients were treated at 100 mg/m2 which was deemed tolerable. There was 1 DLT of grade 3 neutropenia at 125 mg/m2. All grade treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥ 25% of pts were rash (64%), alopecia (52%), pruritus (44%), anemia (44%) leukopenia, fatigue (40% each), dysgeusia, anorexia, nausea (32% each), and neutropenia (28%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurring in > 1 pt were anemia (20%), neutropenia, leukopenia, and maculopapular rash (16%). There were no treatment discontinuations due to toxicity. Twenty-two pts were evaluable for response by RECIST 1.1 with a PR rate of 14% (PR in pancreatic, biliary tract and NSCLC) and disease control rate of 59%. PK is linear and dose proportional. There is no paclitaxel accumulation after weekly dosing, and the t1/2 is between 18-26 hours. Conclusions: FID has a manageable safety profile with MTD not reached. Accrual is continuing at 125 mg/m2. PK is linear, dose proportional and comparable to that of nab-paclitaxel. There is preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated pts across different tumor types. Enrollment in dose escalation continues. Combination studies with immunotherapeutic agents are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03537690.

Download Full-text

A first-in-human phase 1 dose escalation study of spartalizumab (PDR001), an anti–PD-1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer ◽

10.1136/jitc-2020-000530 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. e000530 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Aung Naing ◽

Justin F Gainor ◽

Hans Gelderblom ◽

Patrick M Forde ◽

Marcus O Butler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Solid Tumors ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advanced Solid Tumors ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Dose Escalation Study ◽

Wide Range ◽

Tumor Types ◽

Tumor Biopsies

BackgroundSpartalizumab is a humanized IgG4κ monoclonal antibody that binds programmed death-1 (PD-1) and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2. This phase 1/2 study was designed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of spartalizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.MethodsIn the phase 1 part of the study, 58 patients received spartalizumab, intravenously, at doses of 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg, administered every 2 weeks (Q2W), or 3 or 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W).ResultsPatients had a wide range of tumor types, most commonly sarcoma (28%) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (10%); other tumor types were reported in ≤3 patients each. Most patients (93%) had received prior antineoplastic therapy (median three prior lines) and two-thirds of the population had tumor biopsies negative for PD-L1 expression at baseline. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The recommended phase 2 doses were selected as 400 mg Q4W or 300 mg Q3W. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and adverse events included those typical of other PD-1 antibodies. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were fatigue (22%), diarrhea (17%), pruritus (14%), hypothyroidism (10%), and nausea (10%). Partial responses occurred in two patients (response rate 3.4%); one with atypical carcinoid tumor of the lung and one with anal cancer. Paired tumor biopsies from patients taken at baseline and on treatment suggested an on-treatment increase in CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration in patients with clinical benefit.ConclusionsSpartalizumab was well tolerated at all doses tested in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors. On-treatment immune activation was seen in tumor biopsies; however, limited clinical activity was reported in this heavily pretreated, heterogeneous population. The phase 2 part of this study is ongoing in select tumor types.Trial registration numberNCT02404441.

Download Full-text