A phase I study of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in refractory solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2531-2531
Author(s):  
J. A. Ninan ◽  
H. Bailey ◽  
J. Kolesar ◽  
R. Marnocha ◽  
J. Eickhoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Subjective Evidence ◽  
Tumor Types

2531 Background: Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) is an oral histone deacytlase (HDAC) inhibitor that has anti-tumor activity in hematologic malignancies and advanced solid tumors. Vorinostat has been postulated to act synergistically with bortezomib at the level of aggresome inhibition with creation of reactive oxygen species. We previously conducted a study of this combination with once-daily dosing of vorinostat with bortezomib (Step A). This study (Step B) was conducted to evaluate twice daily dosing of vorinostat during administration of bortezomib to determine safety and efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and activity this combination. Methods: This study used standard eligibility criteria except patients must have had no prior bortezomib. The treatment plan initially consisted of vorinostat given orally twice daily on days 1–14 with bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21 day cycle. Two DLTs (elevated ALT and fatigue) were observed at level 1, and the protocol was amended to administer vorinostat twice daily on days 1–4 and 8–11. Starting dose was vorinostat 200 mg and bortezomib 1 mg/m2. RECIST was used to measure response. Results: 29 pts have been enrolled; 13 men and 16 women. Tumor types include: Prostate (1), Colorectal (3), Pancreatic (6), Sarcoma (7), Biliary (1), Thymus (1), GIST (2), Mesothelioma (1), ovarian (1), Neuroendocrine (1), Lung (1), Head and Neck (1), Breast (2), and Cervical (1). Grade 3–4 toxicities possibly related to SAHA at any dose level were as follows: thrombocytopenia (5), fatigue (3), increased ALT (1), elevated INR (1), anemia, (1), hypotension (1), diarrhea (3), anorexia (1), dizziness (1), nausea/vomiting (1), and hypoalbuminemia (1). The only dose limiting toxicities included elevated ALT (1), fatigue (1). There were two deaths but neither was felt to be related to the drug. The MTD for Step B was established at vorinostat 300 mg BID and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2. Conclusions: The MTD for Step B was established at vorinostat 300 mg BID and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2. Subjective evidence of clinical activity has been observed in patients with refractory solid tumors. These studies were supported by NCI, UO1, CA062491, SAIC 25XS097, and 1ULRR025011. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study of sorafenib in children with refractory solid tumors: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10012-10012 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. C. Widemann ◽  
E. Fox ◽  
P. C. Adamson ◽  
S. Baruchel ◽  
A. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Normal Alt ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

10012 Background: Sorafenib, an oral multitargeted kinase inhibitor, is indicated for treatment of adults with refractory renal cell or hepatocelluar carcinoma. We performed a phase I trial to determine the toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of sorafenib in children with refractory solid tumors. Methods: Sorafenib was administered q12h for 28 consecutive day cycles. Cohorts of 3–12 patients were enrolled at 105, 130, 150, 200, and 250 mg/m2/dose dose levels. Results: 34 eligible pts [16M, median age 14.6 yrs, (range, 5–21)] with osteosarcoma (n = 8), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 3), other sarcomas (n = 13), hepatoblastoma (n = 3), or other solid tumors (n = 7) received 1–22 cycles (median 2). Grade 3 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in 4/6 pts at the starting dose (150 mg/m2) and included hypertension (n = 1), rash/urticaria (n = 1), back pain (n = 1), thrombocytopenia (n = 1) and ALT/AST (n = 1). No DLTs were observed at 105 (n = 6) or 130 (n = 3) mg/m2, and the dose was re-escalated to 150 mg/m2 with modified eligibility criteria (normal ALT) and revised guidelines for grading and management of hypertension. Gr 3 DLTs occurred in 1/6 pts (lipase) at 150 mg/m2 and 2/2 pts (hyponatremia, hand-foot syndrome) at 250 mg/m2. At 200 mg/m2 only 1/6 pts experienced DLT (gr 3 ALT). No objective responses were observed, but 2 pts had tumor shrinkage. Sorafenib AUC did not increase proportionally with dose - the mean AUC0–24h was similar at 150 mg/m2 (28±24 μg · h/mL, n = 9) and 200 mg/m2 (28±17 μg · h/mL, n = 4). Tmax was prolonged and variable (10±11 h, n = 19). Plasma VEGFR (n = 13) decreased from 9.9±1.6 ng/mL at baseline to 8.3±1.7 ng/mL by d 28 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The MTD of sorafenib in children with solid tumors is 200 mg/m2, similar to the adult recommended dose (400 mg). No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I study of triapine in combination with irinotecan in refractory tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12011-12011 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. R. Schelman ◽  
K. Holen ◽  
D. Mulkerin ◽  
J. Kolesar ◽  
J. Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Resonance Spectroscopy ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Paramagnetic Resonance ◽  
Molecule Inhibitor ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

12011 Background: Triapine is a small molecule inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase and has anti-tumor activity alone and in combination with other agents in advanced solid tumors. Based on its ability to limit DNA repair, Triapine has been postulated to act synergistically with irinotecan. This study was conducted to determine the toxicities and efficacy of Triapine with irinotecan. Correlative studies included: pharmacokinetics, MDR polymorphisms, and the effects of Triapine on cell cycle and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Methods: This study used standard eligibility criteria with the following exceptions: patients must have had no prior irinotecan and no G6PD deficiency. The treatment plan consisted of irinotecan on day 1 with Triapine on days 1- 3 of a 21-day cycle. Starting dose (level 1) was irinotecan (150 mg/m2) and Triapine (85 mg/m2/day). RECIST was used to measure response. Results: 10 patients have been enrolled; 5 men, 5 women. Tumor types: 4 pancreatic, 2 cholangio, 1 esophageal, 1 sarcoma, 1 lung, 1 ovarian. Grade 3–4 toxicities at least possibly related to Triapine at any dose level were as follows: neutropenia (3), leukopenia (2), fatigue, hypoxia, nausea, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, abdominal cramping, hypocalcemia, and thrombosis. The first patient enrolled at level 1 developed a DLT (Grade 3 hypoxia). Consequently, irinotecan and Triapine doses were reduced to 100 mg/m2 and 60 mg/m2/day, respectively (level -1). One of 6 patients experienced a DLT at this dose level. Further patients were then enrolled at level 1. There were 2 DLTs of 4 patients at level 1. One partial response (NSCLC) was seen. Conclusions: Unacceptable toxicities were seen at dose level 1; however, dose level -1 was well tolerated. The trial has therefore been amended in order to evaluate a higher dose of irinotecan (150 mg/m2) with the level -1 dose of Triapine (60 mg/m2/day). Accrual continues at this dose level. Antitumor activity in NSCLC was noted at level 1. [Table: see text]

A phase I study of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in refractory solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3573-3573 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. R. Schelman ◽  
J. Kolesar ◽  
K. Schell ◽  
R. Marnocha ◽  
J. Eickhoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Hdac Inhibitors ◽  
26S Proteasome ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Objective Evidence ◽  
Level 1

3573 Background: Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that has anti- tumor activity in hematologic malignancies and advanced solid tumors. Based on studies showing that HDAC inhibitors increase the activity of the 26S proteasome, vorinostat has been postulated to act synergistically with bortezomib. This study was conducted to determine the toxicities and efficacy of vorinostat with bortezomib. Correlative studies included pharmacokinetics and the effects of vorinostat/bortezomib on cell cycle, proteasome inhibition, histone acetylation, gene expression and apoptosis. Methods: This study used standard eligibility criteria except pts must have had no prior bortezomib. The treatment plan consisted of vorinostat given orally on days 1–14 with bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. Starting dose (Step A, level 1) was once-daily vorinostat (400 mg) and bortezomib (0.7 mg/m2). Step B consisted of twice-daily dosing of vorinostat (200mg) with bortezomib at MTD established in Step A. RECIST was used to measure response. Effects on G2/M-phase arrest in buccal mucosa cells (BMC) were measured using flow cytometry. Samples were collected on days 1 and 9, at 0, 2 and 4 hr following treatment. Results: 22 pts have been enrolled; 14 men, 8 women. Tumor types: 5 sarcoma, 5 colorectal, 3 pancreatic, 2 lung, 1 breast, 1 ovarian, 1 bladder, 1 gastric, 1 germ cell, 1 mesothelioma, 1 GIST. Grade 3–4 toxicities at least possibly related to vorinostat at any dose level were as follows: fatigue (3), n/v (1), thrombocytopenia (1), and hyponatremia (1). One pt was unevaluable. DLTs included fatigue (3), hyponatremia (1) and elevated ALT (1). The MTD for Step A was established at vorinostat 400mg daily and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2. One pt with refractory soft tissue sarcoma had a PR > 9 mo. There was no effect on cell cycle arrest observed with vorinostat in BMCs. Conclusions: The MTD for Step A was established at vorinostat 400mg daily and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2. Accrual continues at Step B, dose level 1. Subjective and objective evidence of clinical activity has been observed in pts with refractory solid tumors. (Supported by NCI grant UO1 CA062491, NCI SAIC contract 25XS097 and GCRC M01 RR03186.) No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Selinexor in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyaw Z. Thein ◽  
Sarina A. Piha-Paul ◽  
Apostolia Tsimberidou ◽  
Daniel D. Karp ◽  
Filip Janku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

AbstractSelinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), was demonstrated to hinder the DNA damage repair (DDR) system by reducing DDR proteins while enhancing the killing of cancer cells by DDR-based therapeutics in vivo studies. In this single-center, multi-arm phase 1b study, selinexor with carboplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (DC), irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFIRI), irinotecan, and capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX), were employed as separate parallel arms. Eligible patients have relapsed/ metastatic refractory solid tumors following standard therapy or addition of selinexor to systemic therapy was appropriate. Nineteen patients were treated in the 5 arms. Tumor types included were colorectal (n  = 3), breast (n  = 3), neuroendocrine (n  = 2), ovarian (n  = 2), and pancreas cancers (n  = 2). All patients developed one treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). The most prevalent TRAE were thrombocytopenia (84%), nausea (68%), leukopenia (68%), neutropenia (63%), and fatigue (58%). The common grade 3/4 TRAE were neutropenia (42%), leukopenia (26%), and hyponatremia (21%). Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in 3 separate arms. Fourteen patients were evaluable for response. Although no patients achieved complete or partial response (CR or PR), seven patients attained stable disease (SD). Disease control rate (DCR) was 14%. The combination of oral selinexor with different standard chemotherapies showed limited clinical activity despite toxicity and DLT prevented further dose escalation. Optimizing supportive care, the utility of growth factors, and aggressive measures on antiemetics strategies remain tangible.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495). Sponsor(s): Karyopharm Therapeutics

scholarly journals Safety and clinical activity of intratumoral MEDI9197 alone and in combination with durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Siu ◽  
Joshua Brody ◽  
Shilpa Gupta ◽  
Aurélien Marabelle ◽  
Antonio Jimeno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Palliative Radiation ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Palliative Radiation Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundMEDI9197 is an intratumorally administered toll-like receptor 7 and 8 agonist. In mice, MEDI9197 modulated antitumor immune responses, inhibited tumor growth and increased survival. This first-time-in-human, phase 1 study evaluated MEDI9197 with or without the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced solid tumors.Patients and methodsEligible patients had at least one cutaneous, subcutaneous, or deep-seated lesion suitable for intratumoral (IT) injection. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design. Patients received IT MEDI9197 0.005–0.055 mg with or without RT (part 1), or IT MEDI9197 0.005 or 0.012 mg plus durvalumab 1500 mg intravenous with or without RT (part 3), in 4-week cycles. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and objective response based on Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors version 1.1. Exploratory endpoints included tumor and peripheral biomarkers that correlate with biological activity or predict response.ResultsFrom November 2015 to March 2018, part 1 enrolled 35 patients and part 3 enrolled 17 patients; five in part 1 and 2 in part 3 received RT. The maximum tolerated dose of MEDI9197 monotherapy was 0.037 mg, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of cytokine release syndrome in two patients (one grade 3, one grade 4) and 0.012 mg in combination with durvalumab 1500 mg with DLT of MEDI9197-related hemorrhagic shock in one patient (grade 5) following liver metastasis rupture after two cycles of MEDI9197. Across parts 1 and 3, the most frequent MEDI9197-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade were fever (56%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (21%). The most frequent MEDI9197-related grade ≥3 events were decreased lymphocytes (15%), neutrophils (10%), and white cell counts (10%). MEDI9197 increased tumoral CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells, inducing type 1 and 2 interferons and Th1 response. There were no objective clinical responses; 10 patients in part 1 and 3 patients in part 3 had stable disease ≥8 weeks.ConclusionIT MEDI9197 was feasible for subcutaneous/cutaneous lesions but AEs precluded its use in deep-seated lesions. Although no patients responded, MEDI9197 induced systemic and intratumoral immune activation, indicating potential value in combination regimens in other patient populations.Trial registration numberNCT02556463.

Inducible T-cell co-stimulatory (ICOS) receptor agonist, feladilimab (fela), alone and in combination (combo) with pembrolizumab (P): Results from INDUCE-1 urothelial carcinoma (UC) expansion cohorts (ECs).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4519-4519
Author(s):  
Arjun Vasant Balar ◽  
Victor Moreno ◽  
Eric Angevin ◽  
Hui Kong Gan ◽  
Maria Vieito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

4519 Background: INDUCE-1 is a first-in-human trial evaluating fela, an IgG4 ICOS agonist non-T-cell depleting mAb, as monotherapy (mono) and in combo with P. ECs include tumor types, such as UC, with high ICOS expression and immunotherapy-favorable features. Fela induced IFNγ, increased PD-1/L1 expression, and enhanced antitumor activity in combo with PD-1 blockade nonclinically. We report preliminary efficacy, safety, and biomarker data of fela ± P in INDUCE-1 UC ECs. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had recurrent/metastatic (R/M) UC of the upper or lower urinary tract, ≤6 prior systemic therapy lines in the advanced setting, measurable disease, and no active autoimmune disease. Pts received 0.3 or 1 mg/kg fela (mono EC; anti-PD-1/L1–experienced [exp] pts) or 0.3 mg/kg fela + 200 mg P (combo EC; anti-PD-1/L1–naïve pts) every 3 wks, up to 35 cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Disease was assessed every 9 wks through wk 54, then every 12 wks. Archival and/or fresh biopsy tumor tissue was collected for biomarker analyses and safety assessed. Results: By Nov 6 2020, 13 anti-PD-1/L1–exp and 32 anti-PD-1/L1–naïve pts were evaluable in the mono and combo ECs, respectively. In the mono EC, median age was 69 yrs (range: 47–82), 92% of pts were male, and 85% received ≥2 prior therapy lines in the metastatic setting. In the combo EC, median age was 70 yrs (range: 42–84), 75% of pts were male, and 72% received ≥1 prior therapy line in the metastatic setting. In the mono EC, median duration of follow-up (mDoF) was 10.6 mo (range: 1.1–22.8); overall response rate (ORR) was 8% (1 partial response [PR]; 95% CI: 0.2, 36.0) with a duration of response (DoR) of 6.1 mo; disease control rate (DCR [response or stable disease for ≥9 wks]) was 23% (95% CI: 5.0, 53.8), and median overall survival (mOS) was 14.5 mo (95% CI: 2.8, NR), with 74% of pts alive at 6 mo. In the combo EC, mDoF was 9.6 mo (range: 0.9–28.3); ORR was 22% (7 PRs; 95% CI: 9.3, 40.0) with a median DoR of 8.3 months (range: 3.5–23.3+); DCR was 63% (95% CI: 43.7, 78.9), and mOS was 10.7 mo (95% CI: 5.2, 18.1), with 64% of pts alive at 6 mo. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were reported for 0% and 9% of pts in the mono (N = 16) and combo (N = 44) safety populations, respectively. PD-L1 expression and ICOS-specific biomarkers are being evaluated, with promising trends observed in enrichment of clinical activity in preliminary analyses. Conclusions: Fela is the first ICOS agonist with reported single-agent activity in anti-PD-1/L1–exp relapsed/refractory UC. Fela + P in combo shows promising clinical activity and manageable safety in PD-1/L1–naïve R/M UC. Further study is warranted. Updated data to be presented. Funding: Study 204691 (NCT02723955) funded by GlaxoSmithKline in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Clinical trial information: NCT02723955.

Phase 1 dose escalation study of MGC018, an anti-B7-H3 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2631-2631
Author(s):  
Sekwon Jang ◽  
John D. Powderly ◽  
Alexander I. Spira ◽  
Ouiam Bakkacha ◽  
Deryk Loo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Tumor Types

2631 Background: MGC018 is an investigational ADC with a duocarmycin payload linked to an anti-B7-H3 monoclonal antibody (mAb). B7-H3 is expressed on multiple solid tumors with limited normal tissue expression. It is hypothesized that MGC018 may exert activity against B7-H3-expressing tumors with an acceptable safety profile. Studies demonstrate that B7-H3 is a significant factor in progression and events of metastasis of multiple tumor types, including melanoma. Methods: This phase 1 study characterizes safety, maximum tolerated or maximum administered dose, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and tumor response per RECIST v1.1 of MGC018 in a 3+3+3 dose escalation design in patients with advanced solid tumors. MGC018 was administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks. Results: The study enrolled 29 patients of multiple tumor types, which included 3 melanoma patients refractory to ≥2 prior lines of checkpoint therapy. The study completed 5 of 6 planned dose cohorts (0.5 mg/kg - 4 mg/kg) as of the data cutoff of 21 January 2021. The final cohort of 4 mg/kg has 3 patients with ongoing treatment and follow-up at the date of submission. Dosing MGC018 IV every 3 weeks resulted in minimal serum accumulation. At least 1 treatment emergent adverse event occurred in 29 patients (100.0%); most common (≥25%) were anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, hyperpigmentation, infusion related reaction, nausea, and palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia. Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred; one grade 4 neutropenia (2 mg/kg) and one grade 3 fatigue lasting 7 days (4 mg/kg). No febrile neutropenia was reported. The 3 melanoma patients had reductions in target lesion sum of 24.4%, 27.5%, and 35% (unconfirmed partial response) and remain on treatment as of the data cutoff. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 3 mg/kg. Conclusions: Results to date demonstrate a manageable safety profile, with early evidence of clinical activity in pretreated metastatic melanoma. Cohort expansion is ongoing using a recommended phase 2 dose of 3 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. The planned enrollment includes advanced metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03729596.

A phase 1 trial of FID-007, a novel nanoparticle paclitaxel formulation, in patients with solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3021-3021
Author(s):  
Jacob Stephen Thomas ◽  
Diane Habib ◽  
Diana L. Hanna ◽  
Irene Kang ◽  
Syma Iqbal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Topical Therapy ◽  
Maculopapular Rash ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Proportional

3021 Background: FID-007 (FID) consists of paclitaxel encapsulated in a polyethyloxazoline (PEOX) polymer excipient designed to enhance PK, biodistribution, and tolerability. In addition to allowing the drug to remain in solution until it can enter a cancer cell, the PEOX nanoparticle preferentially delivers paclitaxel to the tumor through the leaky hyperpermeable vasculature. In xenograft studies, FID reduced or limited tumor growth in multiple tumor types including lung, gastric, breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer. FID was more effective at lower or comparable taxane doses with fewer side effects. We present the first-in-human trial of FID. Methods: The study is evaluating the safety, PK, and efficacy of FID in pts with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective is to determine the MTD and RP2D. Pts received FID in doses between 15mg/m2 and 125mg/m2 using a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. FID was given IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Eligibility included ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function, and no more than 3 prior lines of cytotoxic therapy for advanced disease. Results: Twenty-five pts were treated across 6 dose levels. Median age was 62 (44-76). ECOG PS was 2 in 1 pt and 1 in 64%. Median number of cycles was 2 (1-16). There were 2 DLTs of grade 3 rash at 100 mg/m2. Given the transient nature of the rash and response to topical therapy, DLT definition was modified to exclude grade 3 rash that lasts ≤ 7 days and additional patients were treated at 100 mg/m2 which was deemed tolerable. There was 1 DLT of grade 3 neutropenia at 125 mg/m2. All grade treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥ 25% of pts were rash (64%), alopecia (52%), pruritus (44%), anemia (44%) leukopenia, fatigue (40% each), dysgeusia, anorexia, nausea (32% each), and neutropenia (28%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurring in > 1 pt were anemia (20%), neutropenia, leukopenia, and maculopapular rash (16%). There were no treatment discontinuations due to toxicity. Twenty-two pts were evaluable for response by RECIST 1.1 with a PR rate of 14% (PR in pancreatic, biliary tract and NSCLC) and disease control rate of 59%. PK is linear and dose proportional. There is no paclitaxel accumulation after weekly dosing, and the t1/2 is between 18-26 hours. Conclusions: FID has a manageable safety profile with MTD not reached. Accrual is continuing at 125 mg/m2. PK is linear, dose proportional and comparable to that of nab-paclitaxel. There is preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated pts across different tumor types. Enrollment in dose escalation continues. Combination studies with immunotherapeutic agents are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03537690.

scholarly journals A first-in-human phase 1 dose escalation study of spartalizumab (PDR001), an anti–PD-1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aung Naing ◽  
Justin F Gainor ◽  
Hans Gelderblom ◽  
Patrick M Forde ◽  
Marcus O Butler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Tumor Biopsies

BackgroundSpartalizumab is a humanized IgG4κ monoclonal antibody that binds programmed death-1 (PD-1) and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2. This phase 1/2 study was designed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of spartalizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.MethodsIn the phase 1 part of the study, 58 patients received spartalizumab, intravenously, at doses of 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg, administered every 2 weeks (Q2W), or 3 or 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W).ResultsPatients had a wide range of tumor types, most commonly sarcoma (28%) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (10%); other tumor types were reported in ≤3 patients each. Most patients (93%) had received prior antineoplastic therapy (median three prior lines) and two-thirds of the population had tumor biopsies negative for PD-L1 expression at baseline. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The recommended phase 2 doses were selected as 400 mg Q4W or 300 mg Q3W. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and adverse events included those typical of other PD-1 antibodies. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were fatigue (22%), diarrhea (17%), pruritus (14%), hypothyroidism (10%), and nausea (10%). Partial responses occurred in two patients (response rate 3.4%); one with atypical carcinoid tumor of the lung and one with anal cancer. Paired tumor biopsies from patients taken at baseline and on treatment suggested an on-treatment increase in CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration in patients with clinical benefit.ConclusionsSpartalizumab was well tolerated at all doses tested in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors. On-treatment immune activation was seen in tumor biopsies; however, limited clinical activity was reported in this heavily pretreated, heterogeneous population. The phase 2 part of this study is ongoing in select tumor types.Trial registration numberNCT02404441.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Irinotecan and Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: Preliminary Evidence of Clinical Activity

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1116-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex A. Adjei ◽  
Cheri E. Klein ◽  
Helen Kastrissios ◽  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Steven R. Alberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Intravenous Infusion ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and describe the toxicities of the combination of irinotecan and docetaxel administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced malignancies and, also, to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel and describe preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients received 85 courses (median, two courses; range, one to 15 courses) of treatment with irinotecan, administered over 90 minutes by intravenous infusion, followed by docetaxel, administered over 60 minutes by intravenous infusion. Four escalating dose levels of irinotecan/docetaxel (160/50 mg/m2, 160/65 mg/m2, 200/65 mg/m2, and 200/75 mg/m2) were studied. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel. RESULTS: The most common and dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, which consisted of neutropenia that was severe (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria [NCI CTC] grade 4) but brief (< 5 days) in 11 patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicities of anorexia, nausea, and stomatitis were mild to moderate (NCI CTC grades 1 and 2), but there was one incidence each of both CTC grade 3 anorexia and nausea. All patients had total alopecia. Diarrhea was dose-dependent and severe in four patients who failed to take adequate antidiarrhea therapy. Five out of 16 assessable patients, one with cholangiocarcinoma, one with leiomyosarcoma, and three with non–small-cell lung cancer, achieved partial remissions. CONCLUSION: The combination of irinotecan and docetaxel causes significant reversible myelosuppression, which was dose limiting but led to no serious sequelae. There was no evidence of a clinically significant interaction using these two agents in this sequence. The combination showed antitumor activity at all the dose levels tested and should be further studied in a number of tumor types. The recommended phase II dose on this schedule is irinotecan 160 mg/m2 and docetaxel 65 mg/m2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document