scholarly journals Potentially inappropriate medications in elderly ambulatory and institutionalized patients: an observational study

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Petruta Primejdie ◽  
Marius Traian Bojita ◽  
Adina Popa
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Institutionalized Patients ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

Potentially inappropriate medications in older adults: A review of the 2012 Beers Criteria and the implications in persons with dementia

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 166-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole J. Brandt ◽  
Traci Turner
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Beers Criteria ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Drug Classes ◽  
Information Set ◽  
Sliding Scale ◽  
Institutionalized Patients ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

In 2012, the American Geriatrics Society (AGS), along with a panel of 11 experts, updated the Beers Criteria which has evolved significantly since its inception in 1991. The Beers Criteria, in general, classifies medications/medication classes as: (1) potentially inappropriate for use in all older adults, (2) potentially inappropriate for older adults with certain diseases or symptoms and (3) requiring extra caution when used in older adults. Although each patient must be evaluated individually, the Beers Criteria is a useful clinical tool that can be used when initiating pharmacologic agents in both ambulatory and institutionalized patients. The concept behind use of the Beers Criteria is that it allows prescribers to readily identify, and avoid, medications associated with negative outcomes in older adults therefore decreasing the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). Within this review article, there will be a highlight of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) commonly seen in clinical practice settings such as antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics, anticholinergics and sliding scale insulin. The focus will be to outline the risk-benefits of these drug classes within the context of persons with dementia. Furthermore, the use of PIMs has both clinical and financial implications in Medicare Star ratings and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures.

scholarly journals PRESCRIPTION ANALYSIS AND PREVALENCE OF POTENTIALLY INAPPROPRIATE MEDICATION USE IN OLDER ADULTS; AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

2020 ◽  
pp. 108-112
Author(s):  
N. SENTHIL KUMAR ◽  
GEENA K. REJI ◽  
REEMA K. A. ◽  
VIJAYARANGAN S. ◽  
RAMYA A.
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Inappropriate Medication ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Geriatric Population ◽  
Institutional Ethics ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

Objective: The objectives of the present study were to determine the prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medications and Adverse Drug Reactions in older adults and to collect doctors’ responses regarding the PIM list or any other criteria to treat older adults in India. Methods: This was an observational study conducted in different tertiary care hospitals of two districts, Erode and Salem after obtaining approval of the Institutional Ethics Committee. A sample of 250 older adults (60 y and above) and 97 doctors were included during the study period of 6 mo from February 2019 to July 2019. Inappropriate medications were identified by using 2019 updated Beer’s criteria. The causality of the adverse events was assessed by Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. Results: Out of the 250 prescriptions, only 86(34.4%) of the prescriptions were appropriate and 164(65.6%) were inappropriate. The most commonly inappropriate prescribed medications were diuretics, ranitidine, and tramadol. A total of 74 ADRs was observed in 74 patients. Of these, 57(22.8%) ADRs were due to inappropriate medications listed in Beers criteria. There was a significant association between the occurrence of ADRs and the use of PIMs listed in 2019 updated Beer’s criteria [χ2 = 6.08, P = 0.013 (df = 1)]. Conclusion: The study shows that there is a high prevalence of inappropriate medications and adverse drug reactions in hospitalized older adults. Beer’s criteria can be used as a guideline by the physicians while prescribing the drugs to the geriatric population.

scholarly journals Examining Success Factors in Deprescribing Proposals from Community Pharmacists

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Osada
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Community Pharmacists ◽  
Critical Issue ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Unused Medications ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

Abstract Background: Polypharmacy is a critical issue that affects elderly people in particular. In Japan, fees to support deprescription are calculated bycommunity pharmacists who propose deprescribing 2 or more medications for patients prescribed 6 or more. However, the fees are rarely calculated.The objective of this study is toexamine success factors in deprescribing proposals submitted bycommunity pharmacists to prescribing doctors.Methods: Tracing reports submitted from Aug 2017 to Mar 2020 were investigated retrospectively to uncover factors that influenced the success of deprescribing using statisticalanalyses.Results:One hundred and twenty-three unique tracing reports were submitted to the prescribing doctors. Of these, 67 reports were successful in deprescribing and 56 failed; the success rate was 54.5%. Deprescribing proposals with existingunused medications significantly increased the deprescribing success rate. Possible adverse events, potentially inappropriate medications, and overlapping medications with the same effecttended to increase the success rate, but not significantly. Whether the pharmacist experienced face-to-face communication with the prescribing doctors did not significantly influence the outcome.Conclusions:Tracing reports with deprescribing proposals submitted by community pharmacists may help resolve problems arising frompolypharmacy. Mentioning unused medications could increase the deprescribing success rate.Trial registration: This study did not registered due to purely observational study.

Potentially Inappropriate Medications Use in A Population of Iraqi Geriatric Outpatients According to Beers Criteria

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ola Albaghdadi ◽  
Salam , Mohammad Hassan Morteza, Firas A Ahjel ◽  
Mohammad Hassan Morteza ◽  
Firas Aziz Rahi
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Beers Criteria ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Inappropriate Drugs ◽  
Elderly Outpatients ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

Aims: Elderly in Iraq kept suffering multiple burdens, as they are a truly fragile and vulnerable segment. A major public health issue among elderly is adverse drug reactions. This study is aimed at contributing in overcoming this treatment gap by determining the prevalence of inappropriate medications used by a group of Iraqi elderly outpatients. Methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted in a sample of 85 Iraqi elderly aged ≥65 years of either gender. Participants had face-to-face interviews to answer a comprehensive questionnaire. Each drug taken by the patient was evaluated according to Beers criteria. Results: Females constituted 45.9% of the total. The average age was 69.9 years (± 4.6). Nearly 30% of the patients had 3 different diseases, and 17.8% had ≥4 different ones, with cardiovascular diseases were the most prevalent. Polypharmacy was notably identified in 47.1% of the total studied population. Twenty-eight out of 85 patients did not know the actual reason of taking at least one of their medications, and 42% were not taking their drugs as directed. Remarkably, 43.5% of patients were recognized as taking at least one medication to be avoided in elderly people according to the Beers criteria. The most common inappropriate drugs were glyburide, and proton-pump inhibitors. Conclusion: There was an obvious absence of any role of pharmacists in the health care system for our studied population. Health care professionals are encouraged to review the medications prescribed for geriatric patients using updated safety guidelines to prevent the risks associated with potentially inappropriate medications.

scholarly journals Elderly Patients in Primary Care are Still at Risks of Receiving Potentially Inappropriate Medications

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110350
Author(s):  
Pasitpon Vatcharavongvan ◽  
Viwat Puttawanchai
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

Background Most older adults with comorbidities in primary care clinics use multiple medications and are at risk of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prescription. Objective This study examined the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIMs using Thai criteria for PIMs. Methods This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were collected from electronic medical records in a primary care clinic in 2018. Samples were patients aged ≥65 years old with at least 1 prescription. Variables included age, gender, comorbidities, and medications. The list of risk drugs for Thai elderly version 2 was the criteria for PIMs. The prevalence of polypharmacy and PIMs were calculated, and multiple logistic regression was conducted to examine associations between variables and PIMs. Results Of 2806 patients, 27.5% and 43.7% used ≥5 medications and PIMs, respectively. Of 10 290 prescriptions, 47% had at least 1 PIM. The top 3 PIMs were anticholinergics, proton-pump inhibitors, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Polypharmacy and dyspepsia were associated with PIM prescriptions (adjusted odds ratio 2.48 [95% confident interval or 95% CI 2.07-2.96] and 3.88 [95% CI 2.65-5.68], respectively). Conclusion Prescriptions with PIMs were high in the primary care clinic. Describing unnecessary medications is crucial to prevent negative health outcomes from PIMs. Computer-based clinical decision support, pharmacy-led interventions, and patient-specific drug recommendations are promising interventions to reduce PIMs in a primary care setting.

scholarly journals Potentially inappropriate medications and medication combinations before, during and after hospitalizations: an analysis of pathways and determinants in the Swiss healthcare setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Migliazza ◽  
Caroline Bähler ◽  
Daniel Liedtke ◽  
Andri Signorell ◽  
Stefan Boes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Medication Safety ◽  
Drug Effects ◽  
Healthcare Setting ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Medical Needs ◽  
Hospitalization Period ◽  
Mandatory Health Insurance ◽  
Preceding Period ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

Abstract Background A hospitalization phase represents a challenge to medication safety especially for multimorbid patients as acute medical needs might interact with pre-existing medications or evoke adverse drug effects. This project aimed to examine the prevalence and risk factors of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and medication combinations (PIMCs) in the context of hospitalizations. Methods Analyses are based on claims data of patients (≥65 years) with basic mandatory health insurance at the Helsana Group, and on data from the Hirslanden Swiss Hospital Group. We assessed PIMs and PIMCs of patients who were hospitalized in 2013 at three different time points (quarter prior, during, after hospitalization). PIMs were identified using the PRISCUS list, whereas PIMCs were derived from compendium.ch. Zero-inflated Poisson regression models were applied to determine risk factors of PIMs and PIMCs. Results Throughout the observation period, more than 80% of patients had at least one PIM, ranging from 49.7% in the pre-hospitalization, 53.6% in the hospitalization to 48.2% in the post-hospitalization period. PIMCs were found in 46.6% of patients prior to hospitalization, in 21.3% during hospitalization, and in 25.0% of patients after discharge. Additional medication prescriptions compared to the preceding period and increasing age were the main risk factors, whereas managed care was associated with a decrease in PIMs and PIMCs. Conclusion We conclude that a patient’s hospitalization offers the possibility to increase medication safety. Nevertheless, the prevalence of PIMs and PIMCs is relatively high in the study population. Therefore, our results indicate a need for interventions to increase medication safety in the Swiss healthcare setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document