scholarly journals Strategies for smarter catchment hydrology models: incorporating scaling and better process representation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy C. Sidle

AbstractHydrological models have proliferated in the past several decades prompting debates on the virtues and shortcomings of various modelling approaches. Rather than critiquing individual models or modelling approaches, the objective here is to address the critical issues of scaling and hydrological process representation in various types of models with suggestions for improving these attributes in a parsimonious manner that captures and explains their functionality as simply as possible. This discussion focuses mostly on conceptual and physical/process-based models where understanding the internal catchment processes and hydrologic pathways is important. Such hydrological models can be improved by using data from advanced remote sensing (both spatial and temporal) and derivatives, applications of machine learning, flexible structures, and informing models through nested catchment studies in which internal catchment processes are elucidated. Incorporating concepts of hydrological connectivity into flexible model structures is a promising approach for improving flow path representation. Also important is consideration of the scale dependency of hydrological parameters to avoid scale mismatch between measured and modelled parameters. Examples are presented from remote high-elevation regions where water sources and pathways differ from temperate and tropical environments where more attention has been focused. The challenge of incorporating spatially and temporally variable water inputs, hydrologically pathways, climate, and land use into hydrological models requires modellers to collaborate with catchment hydrologists to include important processes at relevant scales—i.e. develop smarter hydrological models.

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 3599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lane ◽  
Murdock ◽  
Genskow ◽  
Betz ◽  
Chatrchyan

Climate change impacts on agriculture have been intensifying in the Northeastern and Midwestern United States. Few empirical studies have considered how dairy farmers and/or their advisors are interpreting and responding to climate impacts, risks, and opportunities in these regions. This study investigates dairy farmer and advisor views and decisions related to climate change using data from seven farmer and advisor focus groups conducted in New York and Wisconsin. The study examined how farmers and advisors perceived climate impacts on dairy farms, the practices they are adopting, and how perceived risks and vulnerability affect farmers’ decision making related to adaptation strategies. Although dairy farmers articulated concern regarding climate impacts, other business pressures, such as profitability, market conditions, government regulations, and labor availability were often more critical issues that affected their decision making. Personal experience with extreme weather and seasonal changes affected decision making. The findings from this study provide improved understanding of farmers’ needs and priorities, which can help guide land-grant researchers, Extension, and policymakers in their efforts to develop and coordinate a comprehensive strategy to address climate change impacts on dairy in the Northeast and the Midwest US.


2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianping Shen ◽  
Van E. Cooley

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Gnann ◽  
Nicholas Howden ◽  
Ross Woods ◽  
Hilary McMillan

<p>Hydrological signatures aim at extracting information about certain aspects of hydrological behaviour. They can be used to quantify hydrological similarity, to explore catchment functioning and to evaluate hydrological models. Relating hydrological signatures to hydrological processes is, however, still a challenge and many signatures remain poorly understood.</p><p>We propose a flexible approach for linking hydrological signatures to hydrological processes, which might help to improve our understanding and hence the usefulness of certain hydrological signatures. As a first step, we should build a perceptual model describing the hydrological process of interest. We should then try to find or create relevant – and ideally widely available – catchment attributes that target the process of interest, and hence have the potential to explain the signature in a process-based way. We should control for climate by either incorporating it into our perceptual model or by analysing sub-climates individually, to disentangle the influences of forcing and catchment form. Lastly, simple conceptual models might be a useful tool to systematically explore the controlling factors (parameters, forcing) of a signature. Focusing on hydrological processes and explaining hydrological signatures in a process-based way will make hydrological signatures more meaningful, useful and robust.</p><p>The proposed approach is tested on signatures related to baseflow and groundwater processes, such as the baseflow index. Baseflow generation has been studied extensively, and while many regional studies could identify landscape controls on baseflow generation (e.g. soils and geology), continental or global studies have resulted in a less clear picture, partially because of the masking influence of climate at these scales. Furthermore, the relationship between controls, such as climate and catchment form, and baseflow response has often been only described statistically (e.g. by means of regression-type approaches).  A mechanistic theory based on widely available catchment attributes (e.g. soils, geology, topography) would thus be a major step towards improved understanding and transferability.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 961-976
Author(s):  
Gijs van Kempen ◽  
Karin van der Wiel ◽  
Lieke Anna Melsen

Abstract. Hydrological extremes affect societies and ecosystems around the world in many ways, stressing the need to make reliable predictions using hydrological models. However, several different hydrological models can be selected to simulate extreme events. A difference in hydrological model structure results in a spread in the simulation of extreme runoff events. We investigated the impact of different model structures on the magnitude and timing of simulated extreme high- and low-flow events by combining two state-of-the-art approaches: a modular modelling framework (FUSE) and large ensemble meteorological simulations. This combination of methods created the opportunity to isolate the impact of specific hydrological process formulations at long return periods without relying on statistical models. We showed that the impact of hydrological model structure was larger for the simulation of low-flow compared to high-flow events and varied between the four evaluated climate zones. In cold and temperate climate zones, the magnitude and timing of extreme runoff events were significantly affected by different parameter sets and hydrological process formulations, such as evaporation. In the arid and tropical climate zones, the impact of hydrological model structures on extreme runoff events was smaller. This novel combination of approaches provided insights into the importance of specific hydrological process formulations in different climate zones, which can support adequate model selection for the simulation of extreme runoff events.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Avanzi ◽  
Simone Gabellani ◽  
Edoardo Cremonese ◽  
Umberto Morra di Cella ◽  
Matthias Huss

<p>Glacier mass balance is an essential component of the water budget of high-elevation and high-latitude regions, and yet this process is rather oversimplified in most hydrological models. This oversimplification is particularly relevant when it comes to representing two mechanisms: ice flow dynamics and melt beneath a supraglacial debris cover. In 2010, Huss et al. proposed a parsimonious approach to account for  glacier dynamics in hydrological models without solving complex equations of three-dimensional ice flow, the so-called delta-h parametrization. On the other hand, accounting for melt of debris-covered ice is still challenging as  estimates of debris thickness are rare. </p><p>Here, we leveraged a distributed dataset of glacier-thickness change to derive a glacier-specific delta-h parametrization for 54 glaciers across the Aosta Valley (Italy), as well as  develop a novel approach for modeling melt beneath supraglacial debris based on residuals between locally observed change in thickness and that expected by regional elevation gradients. This approach does not require any on-the-ground data on debris cover, and as such it is particularly suited for ungauged regions where remote sensing is the only, feasible source of information for modeling. </p><p>We found an expected, significant variability in both the delta-h parametrization and residuals over debris-covered ice across glaciers, with somewhat steeper orographic gradients in the former compared to the curves originally proposed by Huss et al. for Swiss glaciers. At a regional scale, the glacier mass balance showed a clear transition between a regime dominated by active glacier flow above 2,300 m ASL and a debris-dominated regime below this elevation threshold, which makes accounting for melt in the debris-covered area essential to correctly capture the future fate of low-elevation glaciers. Implementing the delta-h parametrization and our proposed approach to melt beneath supraglacial debris into S3M, a distributed cryospheric model, yielded an improved realism in estimates of future changes in glacier geometry  compared to assuming non-dynamic downwasting.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael McCarthy ◽  
Flavia Burger ◽  
Alvaro Ayala ◽  
Stefan Fugger ◽  
Thomas E Shaw ◽  
...  

<p>The Andean cryosphere is a vital water resource for downstream populations. In recent years, it has been in steep decline as a whole, but shown strong spatio-temporal variability due to climatic events such as the current mega drought in central Chile. Glacio-hydrological models are necessary to understand and predict changes in water availability as a result of changes to the cryosphere. However, due to a lack of data for initialisation, forcing, calibration and validation, they are rarely used, especially in the Andes, for periods longer than a few years or decades. While useful insights can be gained from short-term modelling, there is a gap in our understanding of how glaciers impact hydrology on longer timescales, which may prevent local communities and governments from achieving effective planning and mitigation. Here we use the glacio-hydrological model TOPKAPI-ETH – initialised, forced, calibrated and validated using unique and extensive field and remote sensing datasets – to investigate glacier contributions to the streamflow of the high-elevation Rio Yeso catchment, Chile, over the past 50 years. We focus in particular on: 1) fluctuations in glacier surface mass balance and runoff and associated climatic variability; 2) if peak water has already occurred and when; 3) the effect of supraglacial debris cover on seasonal and long-term hydrographs. We offer insights into some of the challenges of running glacio-hydrological models on longer timescales and discuss the implications of our findings in the context of a shrinking Andean cryosphere.</p>


2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 356-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
András Bárdossy ◽  
Shailesh Kumar Singh

The parameters of hydrological models with no or short discharge records can only be estimated using regional information. We can assume that catchments with similar characteristics show a similar hydrological behaviour. A regionalization of hydrological model parameters on the basis of catchment characteristics is therefore plausible. However, due to the non-uniqueness of the rainfall/runoff model parameters (equifinality), a procedure of a regional parameter estimation by model calibration and a subsequent fit of a regional function is not appropriate. In this paper, a different procedure based on the depth function and convex combinations of model parameters is introduced. Catchment characteristics to be used for regionalization can be identified by the same procedure. Regionalization is then performed using different approaches: multiple linear regression using the deepest parameter sets and convex combinations. The assessment of the quality of the regionalized models is also discussed. An example of 28 British catchments illustrates the methodology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document