scholarly journals Comparative study of intrathecal preservative-free midazolam versus nalbuphine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine (0.5%) in patients undergoing elective lower-segment caesarean section

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manisha Kapdi ◽  
Shruti Desai
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Hemodynamic Stability ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Preservative Free

Abstract Background Intrathecal anesthesia is common for parturients undergoing lower-segment caesarean section. Various adjuvants are added to intrathecal bupivacaine for potentiating pharmacological effects, improving quality of sensorimotor block and postoperative analgesia, and preventing adverse effects. The study period was from November 2017 to September 2018, and it was a randomized double-blinded observational study. The sample size calculation was done according to results of our pilot study (done with 5 patients in each group) and discussion with the institutional review board. Also, in this study, we aim to assess nalbuphine/midazolam as adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine for LSCS in terms of quality of sensorimotor block, postoperative analgesia, adverse effects, hemodynamic stability, and Apgar scores of baby at 1 and 5 min. One hundred full-term parturients between 20 and 35 years of ASA grade I/II scheduled for elective lower-segment caesarean section after approval from the institutional review board, and written informed consent were allocated into 2 groups. Randomization was done at the time of giving intrathecal anesthesia by odd and even numbers in an opaque sealed envelope. Group A (n = 50): Bupivacaine heavy (0.5%) 2.0 ml (10 mg) + 0.2 ml Preservative-free inj. midazolam 1 mg Group B (n = 50): Bupivacaine heavy (0.5 %) 2.0 ml (10 mg) + 0.2 ml (0.75 mg) Preservative-free inj. nalbuphine The primary outcome was to assess the perioperative hemodynamic stability, Apgar score, and postoperative analgesia, and the secondary outcome was to assess the complications and adverse effects during the study period. Results The onset of sensory and motor block was earlier in group A than in group B. Total duration of effective postoperative analgesia was more in the midazolam group as compared with the nalbuphine group. The incidence of complications (nausea, vomiting, and pruritus) were more in group B as compared with group A. Conclusion Nalbuphine and midazolam both are good adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for LSCS in terms of hemodynamic stability and good Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min. Intrathecal midazolam provides better postoperative analgesia and less adverse effects.

scholarly journals A comparative study of induction of preterm vaginal delivery at 20 to 28 weeks gestation in previous one lower segment caesarean section by foley catheter and prostaglandin E2 gel

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 3581
Author(s):  
Shruti Agarwal ◽  
Neelam Bharadwaj ◽  
Lata Rajoria ◽  
Indira Lamba
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Prostaglandin E2 ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
P Value ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Catheter Group ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: The aim of the study to assess the maternal outcome and safety of induced preterm vaginal birth after a previous one lower segment caesarean delivery.Methods: In this study, 100 women who had singleton pregnancies with a previous one term lower segment caesarean section, in whom induction of labour was required in between 20 to 28 wks of gestation, were included. Group A (n= 50) were induced by transcervical foley catheter and group B (n= 50) were induced by prostaglandin E2 gel and then progression of labour was monitored. Both groups were compared in terms of induction delivery interval, efficacy and safety.Results: In our study, all women were delivered vaginally and hysterotomy was not required. The mean induction delivery interval in Foley catheter group (20.180±3.3499 hrs) was significantly shorter (p-value <0.001) than PGE2 gel group B (24.050±3.6537 hrs). There was no case of uterine rupture, puerperal pyrexia, postpartum haemorrhage and uterine hyperstimulation.Conclusions: Women with previous lower segment caesarean section in whom premature induction of labour is required for any reason can be done easily, safely and effectively without maternal morbidity. Induction can be done more effectively by using transcervical foley catheter than intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel. It has shorter induction delivery interval and low complication. Hence, I suggest that every woman with previous one lower segment caesarean section who requires premature induction should go for trial of labour before repeating caesarean section.

scholarly journals Comparison of the efficacy, safety, acceptability and fetomaternal outcomes of combination of mifepristone and foley’s catheter with foley’s catheter alone in induction of labour in term pregnancies with previous lower segment caesarean section

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 4181
Author(s):  
Nancy Thind ◽  
Pranav Sood ◽  
Rajeev Sood ◽  
Geetika Gupta Syal
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Group A ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Failed Induction ◽  
Group B

Background: Objective of the study was to compare the efficacy, safety, acceptability, fetomaternal outcomes of combination of mifepristone and Foley’s catheter with Foley’s catheter alone in induction of labor in term pregnancies with previous Lower segment caesarean section (LSCS).Methods: This was a prospective study of 36 women induced with mifepristone and foley’s catheter and 36 women induced with foley’s catheter alone at 37 weeks to 41+6 weeks with previous LSCS.Results: Mean bishop score on admission in combined group (2.44) was comparable with that of foley’s alone group (2.91, p=0.888). Mean Bishop score (BS) after foley’s expulsion in group A and group B was 7.46 and 6.33 respectively, which was statistically significant (p<0.001). In group A 69.5% of women delivered vaginally compared to 52.2% in group B which was comparable (p=0.230). Mean induction to delivery interval was significantly short in combination group (15.5±1.3 hours versus 20.8±1.07 hours, p=0.003). 50% women in group A required oxytocin for induction/ augmentation of labour as compared to 77.8% in group B (p=0.02). Failed induction was statistically higher in group B (p<0.05). No difference was found with regards scar dehiscence, scar rupture, Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), wound infection, puerperal pyrexia, Meconium stained liquor (MSL), fetal distress, mean birth weight, 1 and 5 minutes Appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (APGAR) score, neonatal outcome, hospital stay.Conclusions: Priming with mifepristone before insertion of foley’s catheter results in significant change in BS signifying that combination promotes early cervical ripening as compared to foley’s catheter alone. Mifepristone plays significant role in cervical ripening, reduces induction to delivery interval, oxytocin requirement and failed induction.

scholarly journals TO DETERMINE EFFICACY OF GRANISETRON VERSUS PLACEBO FOR REDUCING SHIVERING IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION UNDER SPINAL ANAESTHESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 530-34
Author(s):  
Sana Abbas ◽  
Bilal Yasin ◽  
Basit Mehmood Khan ◽  
Umer Hayat ◽  
Beenish Abbas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Intravenous Bolus ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To determine the efficacy of granisetron versus placebo (saline) for reducing shivering in patients undergoing lower segment caeserian section under spinal anaesthesia. Study Design: Comparative cross - sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Apr to Sep 2019. Methodology: Total 178 patients undergoing lower segment ceaserian section under spinal anaesthesia with age ranges from 18-40 years of American Society of Anaesthesiologists status I & II with full term pregnancy scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Group A (n=92) received an intravenous bolus of 1 mg granisetron in a 10ml syringe and Group B (n=86) received intravenous bolus of normal saline in a 10ml syringe, drugs were administered immediately before spinal anaesthesia by anaesthetist as coded syringes. Heart rate, blood pressure, core body temperature and shivering scores were measured at 0 minutes, 30 minutes and 60 minutes, average surgery time recorded to be 60 minutes. Results: None of the patients in group A (drug group) exhibited appreciable post spinal shivering whereas 25 (29%) in group B (placebo) had clinically significant shivering necessitated administration of other established pharmacological agents to abort shivering in order to ensure patient comfort and satisfaction with statistically significant p-value of <0.05. Conclusion: Prophylactic injection granisetron was efficacious against post spinal shivering, moreover provides worth while relief of nausea and vomiting which is dilemma with most of the drugs employed for control of post spinal shivering.

scholarly journals Low Dose Bupivacaine plus Fentanyl in Subarachnoid Block for Caesarean Section

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-30
Author(s):  
Nasir Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Masuda Islam Khan ◽  
Aynul Islam Khan ◽  
AKM Akhtaruzzaman
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Haemodynamic Stability ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Mean Time

Background: Spinal anaesthesia induced hypotension, a common problem during caesarean section, is associated with maternal nausea and vomiting and the risk of neonatal acidosis. Low dose local anaesthetic combined with opioids spinal anaesthesia better preserves maternal haemodynamic stability, resulting in equally efficacious anaesthesia.Objectives: To investigate whether this synergistic action could be used to provide effective anaesthesia while preventing hypotension during caesarean operation.Materials and method: This prospective study included 60 pregnant mothers scheduled for caesarean operation who were then divided into two groups (thirty in each). Group-A received a spinal injection of 12.5 mg of standardized 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and group-B received 8 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 20 ?gm fentanyl. Hypotension was defined as the systolic blood pressure drops below 90 mm of Hg or a decrease of systolic blood pressure 25% from pre anaesthesia level and hypotension was treated with a bolus of 5 to 10 mg of intravenous ephedrine. The quality of anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia were evaluated.Results: The mean time required to reach peak sensory level was earlier in group-B than group-A and was statistically significant (p<0.05). The decrease in systolic blood pressure in group-A was significantly more than group-B (p<0.05) and vasopressor requirement was also significantly more in group-A compared to group-B (p<0.05). Mean time of two segment regression of sensory analgesia and complete sensory recovery was significantly early in group-B (p<0.05). Duration of motor recovery in group-B was significantly earlier (p<0.05). The duration of effective analgesia was significantly more in group-B (p<0.05).Conclusion: Low dose Bupivacaine with fentanyl provided excellent intraoperative sensory and motor blockade, haemodynamic stability, and effective postoperative analgesia for caesarean delivery.Delta Med Col J. Jan 2016 4(1): 24-30

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF PHENYLEPHRINE OVER EPHEDRINE IN CONTROLLING FALL OF BLOOD PRESSURE: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keshav Saran Agrawal ◽  
Aruna Mahanta
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Block Level ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: most of the lower segment caesarean sections are done under spinal anesthesia and in more that 80% of the cases, maternal fall in blood pressure can be observed intraoperatively. Throughout history many vasopressor drugs have been evaluated for the treatment. Aim: our research was conducted to compare the effect of phenylephrine with ephedrine given for the prophylaxis of prevention of intraoperative fall in blood pressure in females who are undergoing LSCS. Materials and Methods: a total of 100 cases were considered for our study and were randomly distributed in two groups. Group A cases were administered Phenylephrine while ephedrine was given to group B cases just after spinal anesthesia. Results: most of our study subjects were in the age group of 21-25 years who were in the range of 51-55 kgs. Spinal anesthesia was given by using bupivacaine & block level was checked at 2 & 5 mins. Phenylephrine was found to be superior in control of fall in blood pressure as more than 90% of the cases were brought back to their preoperative levels in less than 4 mins after spinal anesthesia. Whereas in group B, ephedrine took much more time of around 10 mins for control of BP. Conclusion: with proper monitoring of heart rate, phenylephrine is superior to ephedrine in controlling the fall in blood pressure. Keywords: Ephedrine, Phenylephrine, Hypotension, Bradycardia.

scholarly journals Incidence of post-operative (caesarean section) infectious morbidities in cleansing and non-cleansing group after povidone iodine vaginal cleaning

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3393
Author(s):  
Pragya Verma ◽  
Dolly Chawla ◽  
Rashmi Khatri ◽  
Preeti Verma
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Maternal Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Group B ◽  
Control Study

Background: Despite of wide spread use of prophylactic antibiotics and various antiseptic measures, post-operative infection remains one of the significant and serious complication of caesarean delivery contributing to high maternal morbidity and mortality. Objective was to study the incidence of post-operative infectious morbidities in patients with/without povidone iodine vaginal cleansing done prior to caesarean section.Methods: A prospective randomized control study was done in the department of obstetrics and gynecology of Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, New Delhi.Results: Mean age of participants in group A is 26.22±2.47 years and in group B is 26.48±2.3 years. Majority women (84.0%) underwent emergency lower segment caesarean section (LSCS). (6.4%) women developed post-operative endometritis, out of which maximum (4.6%) belong to no vaginal cleansing group (B) compared to 1.8% in povidone iodine vaginal cleansing group(A), which is statistically significant (p=0.01). Over all (13%) women had post-operative fever, with significant difference among the two groups i.e. (8.6%) were in group B versus (4.4%) in group A (p=0.005).Conclusions: Povidone iodine vaginal cleansing prior to caesarean section is significantly effective in reducing post-operative infectious morbidities.

Transversus abdominis plane block by landmark technique with ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing lower segment caesarean section deliveries

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 551-555
Author(s):  
Aishwarya M Chavan ◽  
Geetha R Acharya ◽  
Jyoti V Kale ◽  
Nidhi R Dabral
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Group B

Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block is an efficacious abdominal field block which is widely used component of multimodal analgesia. Compare the efficacy of Inj. Ropivacaine 0.2% and Inj. Bupivacaine 0.2% when used in TAP block for post-operative analgesia in lower segment caesarean section deliveries(LSCS) done under spinal anaesthesia. Randomized double blinded prospective study conducted after institutional ethics committee in our institute. We have recruited sixty patients scheduled for an elective LSCS which were enrolled into two groups to receive TAP block with bupivacaine 0.2% 15ml Group B (n=30) versus ropivacaine 0.2% 15ml Group R (n=30) + dexamethasone 2mg bilaterally. TAP block was administered on completion of surgery. Primary objective was to compare time to rescue analgesia in postoperative period. Secondary Objectives wereto compare hemodynamic response during postoperative period, measure the intensity of pain using visual analogue scale (VAS), number of analgesic doses in first 24 hours, patient satisfaction with pain management and complications if any.SPSS software 16 version. Time for rescue analgesia was shorter in Group B (6.7 hour) than in Group R (9.47 hour) (p = 0.00). VAS was lower in Group R. Higher dose of analgesics was required in Group B (p=0.008). All this led to higher patient satisfaction score in Group R. This study concludes that 0.2% ropivacaine provided a longer duration of analgesia compared to 0.2% bupivacaine when used in TAP block for post-operative analgesia in LSCS deliveries.

scholarly journals Comparative Efficacy of Intrathecal Pethidine with Lignocaine 5% (Heavy) as Sole Anaesthetic Agent for Perineal Operations

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-83
Author(s):  
Jitta Sudershan Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Anaesthetic Agent ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Motor Paralysis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Preservative Free

Background: The discovery of opioid receptors and ligand in the brain and spinal cord lead to the feasibility of their use intrathecally. Pethidine is the only narcotic that has been shown to be effective intrathecally for surgery. This is probably because it as a phenyl-piperidine derivative and has a structure and action similar to that of local anaesthetic.Subjects and Methods:50 patients belonging to ASA grade 1 and 2 physical status were randomly assigned to two groups A and B. Patients in group A received 1 ml of 5% lignocaine (heavy) intrathecally and those in group B gained intrathecal Pethidine (preservative-free) 0.5mg/kg body weight. The time for onset and level of sensory blockade, onset and degree of motor blockade, hemodynamic parameters, time for regression of sensory and motor blockade, duration of postoperative analgesia and side effects were noted and compared in both the groups.Results:Two groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, height and weight. The onset of sensory and motor blockade in-group A was 2.00±1.06min and 2.56±0.88 and in-group B it was 3.56±1.64 min and 7.22±1.11 min respectively, which was statistically significant. Grade I motor paralysis was seen in 2 cases (10%) in group A and 15 cases (75%) in groupB. Grade II motor paralysis was seen in 6 cases (30%) in group A and 5 cases (25%) in group B. Grade III motor paralysis was viewed in 12 cases (60%) in group A and 0 cases(0%) in group B. Grade I and III motor paralysis in the groups were statistically significant (p<0.05). Time for sensory regression at L1 was 65.12±4.83 min in-group A and 94.60±6.88 min in-group B that was statistically very significant (p<0.05). The time for regression of motor blockade was 60.40±3.85 in-group A and 60.20±5.02 in group B, which was statistically not significant (p>0.05). The duration of postoperative analgesia was 122.84±9.37 min in-group A and 320.60±23.02 in group B, which was statistically very significant. The incidence of side effects was comparable in both groups.Conclusion:Pethidine (preservative-free) 0.5mg/kg body weight can be used intrathecally as a sole anaesthetic agent to provide prolonged postoperative analgesia associated with hemodynamic stability and early ambulation in patients undergoing perineal surgeries.

scholarly journals Comparison between fractionated dose with bolus dose in Spinal Anaesthesia for haemodynamic stability and duration of analgesia in patients undergoing elective Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS)

Mediscope ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-102
Author(s):  
Md Munjur Hossain ◽  
Biplab Biswas ◽  
Pankaj Kumar Mohanta ◽  
Muhammad Masud Hassan ◽  
Plabon Basu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Bolus Dose ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Haemodynamic Stability ◽  
Spine Deformities ◽  
Group B

Background: Elective or emergency caesarean sections are routinely done under spinal anaesthesia (SA) with bolus dose of local anaesthetic drugs. Objective: To compared fractionated dose with bolus dose in SA for haemodynamic stability and duration of analgesia in patients undergoing elective lower segment caesarean section (LSCS). Methods: The present study was carried out in the Department of Anaesthesiology, Ad-din Akij Medical College Hospital, Khulna from January 2018 to December 2018 on sixty female patients (thirty in each group) of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–III, age from 18 to 40 years, height from 140 to 180 cm, singleton pregnancies scheduled for elective LSCS under SA. Patients with pre-existing diseases or pregnancy-induced hypertension, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, any contraindication to SA, those weighing <50 kg or >110 kg and those taller than 180 cm or shorter than 140 cm and severely altered mental status, spine deformities or history of laminectomy were excluded from the study. Results: The mean duration of analgesia was statistically significant (p<0.05) between two groups. Mean pulse rate- after 5 min, after 10 min, after 15 min, after 30 min, after 45 min and after 60 min were significantly (p<0.05) higher in group F than group B. Mean arterial pressure- before given study drug, after 0 min, after 5 min, after 10 min, after 15 min, after 30 min, after 45 min and after 60 min were not significantly (p>0.05) between two group. 14 patients (46.7%) in group B and 5 patients (16.7%) in group F required vasopressor. The difference was significant (p<0.05) between two groups. Conclusion: Separation process in which a certain quantity of a mixture dose of SA provides better haemodynamic stability and longer period of analgesia compare to bolus dose in patients undergoing elective caesarean section. Mediscope Vol. 7, No. 2: July 2020, Page 95-102

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF LEVOBUPIVACAINE IN TRANSVERSE ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CAESAREAN SECTION: A DOUBLE BLINDED, RANDOMIZED STUDY

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Praveen S ◽  
Shashank M
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Transverse Abdominis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Double Blinded

Background: Dexamethasone has a long and efficient glucocorticoid structure and presents anti-inflammatory properties. When used as an adjuvant to local anaesthetics, it prolongs the duration of analgesia. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in TAP block given to patients who underwent caesarean section. Materials & Methods: 70 patients posted for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were included in the study and divided into two groups. Group A received bilateral 30 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine and 2 ml dexamethasone(8mg). Group B received bilateral 30 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine and 2 ml 0.9% NaCl in a TAP block performed with ultrasonography. The time needed for the first rescue analgesia in the postoperative period was recorded. 24hr tramadol consumption & VAS was recorded. Results: Time for first analgesic administration (tramadol) was prolonged significantly in Group A (mean ± SD- 12.24 ± 1.22hrs) as compared to Group B (mean ± SD ‑ 8.37± 1.07 hrs), P < 0.0001. Tramadol requirement for 24hrs in Group A was 115.71± 16.89 mg and for Group B was 198.57± 22.64 mg, which was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). VAS was noted at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 24 h. VAS was greatly reduced in group A for the first 8–10 h post‑operatively as compared to patients in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone when used as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in TAP block, enhances the duration of block & decreases opioid consumption in the post- caesarean section patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document