scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of double inversion recovery (DIR) in detection of cortical gray matter lesions in patients with MS

2022 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud M. Higazi ◽  
Hosny Sayed Abd El Ghany ◽  
Alaa Wagih Fathy ◽  
Muhammad Mamdouh Ismail ◽  
Manal F. Abu Samra
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Gray Matter ◽  
Grey Matter ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Inversion Recovery ◽  
Double Inversion Recovery ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Cortical Grey Matter ◽  
Cortical Gray Matter ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Conventional imaging techniques have a low sensitivity for detection of cortical and deep grey matter lesions in MS which hinder accurate assessment of the total lesion burden. Aim of this work was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of double inversion recovery (DIR) sequence in the detection of cortical grey matter lesions in MS patients. Results Forty MS patients were prospectively included in this study. Imaging was performed using Philips Ingenia 1.5 T device. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of DIR sequence in detection of cortical grey matter lesions were 60%, 100%, 100%, 55.6% and 73.3%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values as well as accuracy of Flair sequence were 50%, 100%, 100%, 50% and 66.7%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values as well as accuracy of T2 sequence in the detection of cortical grey matter lesions were 22.5%, 100%, 100%, 39.2% and 48.3%, respectively. Conclusions Detection rate of cortical gray matter lesions was significantly higher on DIR sequence than on T2 and Flair sequences.

scholarly journals A Study of the Diagnostic Accuracy of an Existing Multivariable Test to Predict Shoulder Dystocia

2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. e262-e267
Author(s):  
Henry Alexander Easley ◽  
Todd Michael Beste
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Study Design ◽  
False Positive ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Shoulder Dystocia ◽  
The Other ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a multivariable prediction model, the Shoulder Screen (Perigen, Inc.), and compare it with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines to prevent harm from shoulder dystocia. Study Design The model was applied to two groups of 199 patients each who delivered during a 4-year period. One group experienced shoulder dystocia and the other group delivered without shoulder dystocia. The model's accuracy was analyzed. The performance of the model was compared with the ACOG guideline. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of the model were 23.1, 99.5, 97.9, and 56.4%, respectively. The sensitivity of the ACOG guideline was 10.1%. The false-positive rate of the model was 0.5%. The accuracy of the model was 61.3%. Conclusion A multivariable prediction model can predict shoulder dystocia and is more accurate than ACOG guidelines.

scholarly journals Feasibility and Validity of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Michail ◽  
Abdul-Rahman Ihdayhid ◽  
Andrea Comella ◽  
Udit Thakur ◽  
James D. Cameron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) is a clinically used modality for assessing coronary artery disease, however, its use has not been validated in patients with severe aortic stenosis. This study assesses the safety, feasibility, and validity of CT-FFR in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Methods: Prospectively recruited patients underwent standard-protocol invasive FFR and coronary CT angiography (CTA). CTA images were analyzed by central core laboratory (HeartFlow, Inc) for independent evaluation of CT-FFR. CT-FFR data were compared with FFR (ischemia defined as FFR ≤0.80). Results: Forty-two patients (68 vessels) underwent FFR and CTA; 39 patients (92.3%) and 60 vessels (88.2%) had interpretable CTA enabling CT-FFR computation. Mean age was 76.2±6.7 years (71.8% male). No patients incurred complications relating to premedication, CTA, or FFR protocol. Mean FFR and CT-FFR were 0.83±0.10 and 0.77±0.14, respectively. CT calcium score was 1373.3±1392.9 Agatston units. On per vessel analysis, there was positive correlation between FFR and CT-FFR (Pearson correlation coefficient, R =0.64, P <0.0001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were 73.9%, 78.4%, 68.0%, and 82.9%, respectively, with 76.7% diagnostic accuracy. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for CT-FFR was 0.83 (0.72–0.93, P <0.0001), which was higher than that of CTA and quantitative coronary angiography ( P =0.01 and P <0.001, respectively). Bland-Altman plot showed mean bias between FFR and CT-FFR as 0.059±0.110. On per patient analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values were 76.5%, 77.3%, 72.2%, and 81.0% with 76.9% diagnostic accuracy. The per patient area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was 0.81 (0.67–0.95, P <0.0001). Conclusions: CT-FFR is safe and feasible in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Our data suggests that the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR in this cohort potentially enables its use in clinical practice and provides the foundation for future research into the use of CT-FFR for coronary evaluation pre-aortic valve replacement.

Interpretations of the dial test should be reconsidered. A diagnostic accuracy study reporting sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-204
Author(s):  
Richard Norris ◽  
Christian Kopkow ◽  
Michael James McNicholas
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Knee Ligament ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Medial Knee ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Dial Test

ObjectivesTo determine the accuracy of the dial test, used alone and in combination with additional clinical tests, in the diagnosis of an isolated posterolateral corner (PLC) injury, combined PLC-posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury or medial knee injury.MethodsA retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic and/or open knee ligament reconstruction surgery was conducted. The dial test was performed in an outpatient’s clinic as part of a routine knee examination. Examination under anaesthetic and intraoperative findings were used as the reference standard test to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the dial test used alone and in combination with other PCL and medial knee tests. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR−) were calculated with corresponding 95% CI.ResultsData from 87 patients were available and included in the data analysis. For an isolated PLC injury, the dial test sensitivity and specificity were 0.20 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.39) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.00). The PPV and NPV were 1.00 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.00) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.80). LR+ and LR− of the dial test detecting isolated PLC injury were infinity (95% CI calculation not possible, infinity) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.57). The diagnostic accuracy of the dial test, when used alone and in combination with other PCL and medial knee tests, was also calculated for combined PLC-PCL and medial knee injuries.ConclusionA negative dial test at 30° of knee flexion can rule out a PLC injury, while a test that is positive at 30° and negative at 90° indicates a PLC injury, without concomitant injury to the PCL or medial knee ligaments. A positive test at both 30° and 90° can indicate isolated PLC, combined PLC-PCL or medial ligament injuries, and other knee examination findings are required to differentially diagnose these injury patterns.Level of evidenceII.

scholarly journals Nuclear imaging does not have clear added value in patients with low a priori chance of periprosthetic joint infection. A retrospective single-center experience

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Karsten D. Ottink ◽  
Stefan J. Gelderman ◽  
Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker ◽  
Joris J. W. Ploegmakers ◽  
Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Nuclear Imaging ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract. Background: A low-grade periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) may present without specific symptoms, and its diagnosis remains a challenge. Three-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) and white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy are incorporated into recently introduced diagnostic criteria for PJI, but their exact value in diagnosing low-grade PJI in patients with nonspecific symptoms remains unclear. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated patients with a prosthetic joint of the hip or knee who underwent TPBS and/or WBC scintigraphy between 2009 and 2016 because of nonspecific symptoms. We reviewed and calculated diagnostic accuracy of the TPBS and/or WBC scintigraphy to diagnose or exclude PJI. PJI was defined based on multiple cultures obtained during revision surgery. In patients who did not undergo revision surgery, PJI was ruled out by clinical follow-up of at least 2 years absent of clinical signs of infection based on MSIS 2011 criteria. Results: A total of 373 patients were evaluated, including 340 TPBSs and 142 WBC scintigraphies. Thirteen patients (3.5 %) were diagnosed with a PJI. TPBS sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were 71 %, 65 %, 8 % and 98 %, respectively. Thirty-five percent of TPBS showed increased uptake. Stratification for time intervals between the index arthroplasty and the onset of symptoms did not alter its diagnostic accuracy. WBC scintigraphy sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 30 %, 90 %, 25 % and 94 %, respectively. Conclusion: Nuclear imaging does not have clear added value in patients with low a priori chance of periprosthetic joint infection.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of videofluoroscopy for symptomatic cervical spine injury following whiplash trauma

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D Freeman ◽  
Evan A Katz ◽  
Scott L. Rosa ◽  
Bryan D Gatterman ◽  
Ellen M F Strömmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Spinal Injury ◽  
Chronic Neck Pain ◽  
Common Finding ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Whiplash Trauma ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract BackgroundIntervertebral instability is a relatively common finding among patients with chronic neck pain after whiplash trauma. Videofluoroscopy (VF) of the cervical spine is a potentially sensitive diagnostic tool for evaluating instability, as it offers the ability to examine relative intervertebral movement over time, and across the entire continuum of voluntary movement of the patient. At the present time there are no studies of the diagnostic accuracy of VF for discriminating between injured and uninjured populations.MethodsSymptomatic (injured) study subjects were recruited from consecutive patients with chronic (>6 weeks) post-whiplash pain presenting to medical and chiropractic offices equipped with VF facilities. Asymptomatic (uninjured) volunteers were recruited from family and friends of patients. Ethical review and oversight was provided by the Spinal Injury Foundation, Broomfield, CO. Three statistical models were utilized to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of positive VF findings to correctly discriminate between injured and injured subjects. ResultsAll 3 models demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity (i.e. ROC values of 0.71 to 0.95), however, the model with the greatest practical clinical utility was based on the number of abnormal VF findings. For 2+ abnormal VF findings the ROC was 0.88 (93% sensitivity, 79% specificity), and the PPV and NPV were both 88%. ConclusionsVideofluoroscopic examination of the cervical spine provides a high degree of diagnostic accuracy for identification of vertebral instability in patients with chronic pain stemming from whiplash trauma.

scholarly journals A comparative study of RIPASA score and ALVARADO score in diagnosis of acute appendicitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 796
Author(s):  
Vamsavardhan Pasumarthi ◽  
C. P. Madhu
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Ripasa Score

Background: The RIPASA Score is a new diagnostic scoring system developed for the diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis which showed higher sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy compared to ALVARADO Score, particularly when applied to Asian population. Not many studies have been conducted to compare RIPASA and ALVARADO scoring systems. Hence, author want to compare prospectively Alvarado and RIPASA score by applying them to the patients attending the hospital with right iliac fossa pain that could probably be acute appendicitis.Methods: A prospective analysis of 116 cases admitted with RIF pain during a 2 years period was performed. Patients between 15-60 years were scored as per Alvarado and RIPASA scoring system. Histopathological reports of the cases were collected and compared with the scores. ROC curve area analysis was performed to examine diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA and ALVARADO scores.Results: The sensitivity of ALVARADO score is estimated to be 52.08 for a cut off of 6. The specificity is 80%, positive predictive value is 92.59, negative predictive value is 25.81. The Diagnostic accuracy of ALVARADO scoring is found to be 56.9. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values of RIPASA scoring system are 75%, 65%, 91.14%, 35.14%. The diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA score is 73.28.Conclusions: The difference in the diagnostic accuracy between ALVARADO and RIPASA scoring system is significant indicating that the RIPASA score is a much better diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. When the ROC curve was observed the area under the curve is high for RIPASA scoring system.

Usefulness of Grey Scale and Doppler transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of ovarian torsion

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-102
Author(s):  
Khalid Rehman `Yousaf ◽  
Shahzad Saeed ◽  
Saman Chaudhry ◽  
Rabia Bashrat ◽  
Abadullah Khalid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Ovarian Torsion ◽  
Transvaginal Sonography ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Grey Scale ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Ovarian torsion diagnosis is a great challenge as delay in diagnosis can cause severe morbidity. Early accurate diagnosis is crucial to preserve ovarian function. Ultrasonography being the primary imaging modality plays a vital role in the evaluation of suspected ovarian torsion by helping surgeons reach the correct diagnosis, thus avoiding unnecessary intervention. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of isolated and combined sonographic features of ovarian torsion on grey scale and Doppler transvaginal ultrasonography. Patients and methods: From radiology database, from January 2016 till December 2019, sonographic signs of ovarian torsion in 113 women with suspected ovarian torsion on ultrasonography and subsequent surgical diagnosis were evaluated. Ultrasound findings were compared with surgical findings to determine the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of individual and combined ultrasound signs. Results: Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for ovarian torsion was 85.8%. Abnormal ovarian Doppler flow was the most accurate individual sonographic sign with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of 85.8%, 83.5%, 100% and 100% respectively followed by ovarian enlargement and ovarian edema. Combined ultrasound signs resulted in higher sensitivity and positive predictive values, and lower specificity and negative predictive values for ovarian torsion. Increasing the number of sonographic parameters increased the specificity but decreased sensitivity. High accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value, specificity and negative predictive value was seen when combination of three or two sonographic parameters was used as diagnostic criteria. Conclusion: Transvaginal sonography is a convenient, reliable and extremely useful imaging modality for preoperative diagnosis of ovarian torsion with high specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy helping treating physicians to take prompt decisions regarding timely surgical intervention. However, due to low negative predictive values, absence of sonographic signs does not rule out ovarian torsion and high index of clinical suspicion remains of utmost importance.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of the defining characteristics of the excessive fluid volume diagnosis in hemodialysis patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1057-1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Isabel da Conceição Dias Fernandes ◽  
Miclécia de Melo Bispo ◽  
Érida Maria Diniz Leite ◽  
Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes ◽  
Viviane Martins da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Fluid Volume ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Northeastern Brazil ◽  
Pulmonary Congestion ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Nursing Diagnosis ◽  
Breath Sounds ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objective: to evaluate the accuracy of the defining characteristics of the excess fluid volume nursing diagnosis of NANDA International, in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Method: this was a study of diagnostic accuracy, with a cross-sectional design, performed in two stages. The first, involving 100 patients from a dialysis clinic and a university hospital in northeastern Brazil, investigated the presence and absence of the defining characteristics of excess fluid volume. In the second step, these characteristics were evaluated by diagnostic nurses, who judged the presence or absence of the diagnosis. To analyze the measures of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Approval was given by the Research Ethics Committee under authorization No. 148.428. Results: the most sensitive indicator was edema and most specific were pulmonary congestion, adventitious breath sounds and restlessness. Conclusion: the more accurate defining characteristics, considered valid for the diagnostic inference of excess fluid volume in patients undergoing hemodialysis were edema, pulmonary congestion, adventitious breath sounds and restlessness. Thus, in the presence of these, the nurse may safely assume the presence of the diagnosis studied.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document