Automatic algorithm for triaxial hodogram source location in downhole acoustic emission measurement

Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 508-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Nagano ◽  
H. Niitsuma ◽  
N. Chubachi

An automatic acoustic emission (AE) source location algorithm has been developed for downhole AE measurement of subsurface cracks by using the triaxial hodogram method. The P-wave arrival time is detected by analyzing crosscorrelation coefficients among three components of AE signal energy; the P-wave direction is determined by the method of least squares. For detection of S-wave arrival time, a maximum‐likelihood method analyzes a distribution of instantaneous values of the SH-wave component amplitude. This algorithm can locate an AE source as accurately as human analysis. For field measurements, it takes less than 4 s to locate an AE source using a 16-bit personal computer with a program in C language. Automatic AE source location by the triaxial hodogram method has been realized with this algorithm.

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. KS63-KS73
Author(s):  
Yangyang Ma ◽  
Congcong Yuan ◽  
Jie Zhang

We have applied the cross double-difference (CDD) method to simultaneously determine the microseismic event locations and five Thomsen parameters in vertically layered transversely isotropic media using data from a single vertical monitoring well. Different from the double-difference (DD) method, the CDD method uses the cross-traveltime difference between the S-wave arrival time of one event and the P-wave arrival time of another event. The CDD method can improve the accuracy of the absolute locations and maintain the accuracy of the relative locations because it contains more absolute information than the DD method. We calculate the arrival times of the qP, qSV, and SH waves with a horizontal slowness shooting algorithm. The sensitivities of the arrival times with respect to the five Thomsen parameters are derived using the slowness components. The derivations are analytical, without any weak anisotropic approximation. The input data include the cross-differential traveltimes and absolute arrival times, providing better constraints on the anisotropic parameters and event locations. The synthetic example indicates that the method can produce better event locations and anisotropic velocity model. We apply this method to the field data set acquired from a single vertical monitoring well during a hydraulic fracturing process. We further validate the anisotropic velocity model and microseismic event locations by comparing the modeled and observed waveforms. The observed S-wave splitting also supports the inverted anisotropic results.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 1620-1632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avik Kumar Das ◽  
Christopher KY Leung

Acoustic emission is a powerful experimental structural health monitoring technique for determining the location of cracks formed in a member. Pinpointing wave arrival time is essential for accurate source location. Conventional arrival detection technique’s accuracy deteriorates rapidly in low signal to noise ratio (5–40 dB) region, thus unsuitable for source location due to this inaccuracy. A new technique to pinpoint the arrival time based on the power of the wave is proposed. We have designed an adaptive filter based on the power characteristics of acoustic emission wave. After filtration of the acoustic emission wave, sliding window is employed to accurately identify the region of wave arrival based on the change in transmitted power. The results from various experimental and numerical arrival time detection experiments consistently show that the proposed methodology is stable and accurate for a wide range of signal to noise ratio values (5–100 dB). Particularly, in signal to noise ratio region (5–40 dB), the method is significantly more accurate as compared to the other methods described in the literature. The method was then employed to study the localized damage progression in a steel fiber–reinforced beam under four-point bending. The results suggest that calculated source location using the new method is consistent with that from visual inspection of the member at failure and more accurate than the localization results from existing method.


2021 ◽  
Vol 873 (1) ◽  
pp. 012014
Author(s):  
Sri Kiswanti ◽  
Indriati Retno Palupi ◽  
Wiji Raharjo ◽  
Faricha Yuna Arwa ◽  
Nela Elisa Dwiyanti

Abstract Initial identification on an earthquake record (seismogram) is something that needs to be done precisely and accurately. Moreover, the discovery of a series of unexpected successive earthquake events has caused unpreparedness for the community and related agencies in tackling these events. Determining the arrival time of the P and S waves becomes an important parameter to finding the location of the earthquake source (hypocenter) as well as further information related to the earthquake event. However, manual steps that are currently often used are considered to be less effective, because it requires a lot of time in the process. Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) analysis can be a solution for this problem. With further CWT analysis in the form of a scalogram, can help to determine the arrival time of P and S waves automatically (automatic picking) becomes simpler. In addition, further CWT analysis can also be utilized to help identify the sequence of earthquake events (foreshock, mainshock, aftershock) through the resulting scalogram pattern.


Author(s):  
Masumi Yamada ◽  
Jim Mori

Summary Detecting P-wave onsets for on-line processing is an important component for real-time seismology. As earthquake early warning systems around the world come into operation, the importance of reliable P-wave detection has increased, since the accuracy of the earthquake information depends primarily on the quality of the detection. In addition to the accuracy of arrival time determination, the robustness in the presence of noise and the speed of detection are important factors in the methods used for the earthquake early warning. In this paper, we tried to improve the P-wave detection method designed for real-time processing of continuous waveforms. We used the new Tpd method, and proposed a refinement algorithm to determine the P-wave arrival time. Applying the refinement process substantially decreases the errors of the P-wave arrival time. Using 606 strong motion records of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake sequence to test the refinement methods, the median of the error was decreased from 0.15 s to 0.04 s. Only three P-wave arrivals were missed by the best threshold. Our results show that the Tpd method provides better accuracy for estimating the P-wave arrival time compared to the STA/LTA method. The Tpd method also shows better performance in detecting the P-wave arrivals of the target earthquakes in the presence of noise and coda of previous earthquakes. The Tpd method can be computed quickly so it would be suitable for the implementation in earthquake early warning systems.


Geophysics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa V. Block ◽  
C. H. Cheng ◽  
Michael C. Fehler ◽  
W. Scott Phillips

Seismic imaging using microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing produces a three-dimensional (3-D), S-wave velocity model of the fractured zone, improves the calculated locations of the microearthquakes, and may lead to better estimates of fractureplane orientations, fracture density, and water flow paths. Such information is important for predicting the amount of heat energy that may be extracted from geothermal reservoir. A fractured zone was created at the Los Alamos Hot Dry Rock Reservoir in north-central New Mexico within otherwise impermeable basement rock by injecting [Formula: see text] of water into a borehole under high pressure at a depth of 3.5 km. Induced microearthquakes were observed using four borehole seismometers. The P-wave and S-wave arrival times have been inverted to find the 3-D velocity structures and the microearthquake locations and origin times. The inversion was implemented using the separation of parameters technique, and constraints were incorporated to require smooth velocity structures and to restrict the velocities within the fractured region to be less than or equal to the velocities of the unfractured basement rock. The rms amval time residuals decrease by 11–15 percent during the joint hypocenter-velocity inversion. The average change in the microearthquake locations is 20–27 m, depending on the smoothing parameter used. Tests with synthetic data imply that the absolute locations may improve by as much as 35 percent, while the relative locations may improve by 40 percent. The general S-wave velocity patterns are reliable, but the absolute velocity values are not uniquely determined. However, studies of inversions using various degrees of smoothing suggest that the S-wave velocities decrease by at least 13 percent in the most intensely fractured regions of the reservoir. The P-wave velocities are poorly constrained because the P-wave traveltime perturbations caused by the fluid-filled fractures are small compared to the amval time noise level. The significant difference in the relative signal-to-noise levels of the P-wave and S-wave arrival time data, coupled with the limited ray coverage, can produce a bias in the computed [Formula: see text] ratios, and corresponding systematic rotation of the microearthquake cluster. These adverse effects were greatly reduced by applying a [Formula: see text] lower bound based on the [Formula: see text] ratio of the unfractured basement rock.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 00019
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Hubicka ◽  
Jakub Sokolowski

Seismic event consists of surface waves and body waves. Due to the fact that the body waves are faster (P-waves) and more energetic (S-waves) in literature the problem of their analysis is taken more often. The most universal information that is received from the recorded wave is its moment of arrival. When this information is obtained from at least four seismometers in different locations, the epicentre of the particular event can be estimated [1]. Since the recorded body waves may overlap in signal, the problem of wave onset moment is considered more often for faster P-wave than S-wave. This however does not mean that the issue of S-wave arrival time is not taken at all. As the process of manual picking is time-consuming, methods of automatic detection are recommended (these however may be less accurate). In this paper four recently developed methods estimating S-wave arrival are compared: the method operating on empirical mode decomposition and Teager-Kaiser operator [2], the modification of STA/LTA algorithm [3], the method using a nearest neighbour-based approach [4] and the algorithm operating on characteristic of signals’ second moments. The methods will be also compared to wellknown algorithm based on the autoregressive model [5]. The algorithms will be tested in terms of their S-wave arrival identification accuracy on real data originating from International Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS) database.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document