Inversion of reflection traveltimes for transverse isotropy

In anisotropic media, the short‐spread stacking velocity is generally different from the root‐mean‐square vertical velocity. The influence of anisotropy makes it impossible to recover the vertical velocity (or the reflector depth) using hyperbolic moveout analysis on short‐spread, common‐midpoint (CMP) gathers, even if both P‐ and S‐waves are recorded. Hence, we examine the feasibility of inverting long‐spread (nonhyperbolic) reflection moveouts for parameters of transversely isotropic media with a vertical symmetry axis. One possible solution is to recover the quartic term of the Taylor series expansion for [Formula: see text] curves for P‐ and SV‐waves, and to use it to determine the anisotropy. However, this procedure turns out to be unstable because of the ambiguity in the joint inversion of intermediate‐spread (i.e., spreads of about 1.5 times the reflector depth) P and SV moveouts. The nonuniqueness cannot be overcome by using long spreads (twice as large as the reflector depth) if only P‐wave data are included. A general analysis of the P‐wave inverse problem proves the existence of a broad set of models with different vertical velocities, all of which provide a satisfactory fit to the exact traveltimes. This strong ambiguity is explained by a trade‐off between vertical velocity and the parameters of anisotropy on gathers with a limited angle coverage. The accuracy of the inversion procedure may be significantly increased by combining both long‐spread P and SV moveouts. The high sensitivity of the long‐spread SV moveout to the reflector depth permits a less ambiguous inversion. In some cases, the SV moveout alone may be used to recover the vertical S‐wave velocity, and hence the depth. Success of this inversion depends on the spreadlength and degree of SV‐wave velocity anisotropy, as well as on the constraints on the P‐wave vertical velocity.