Anisotropic parameters and P‐wave velocity for orthorhombic media

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1292-1309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Fractured Reservoirs ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Azimuthal Velocity ◽  
Analytic Solutions ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
P Waves ◽  
Velocity Anisotropy ◽  
Wide Range

Although orthorhombic (or orthotropic) symmetry is believed to be common for fractured reservoirs, the difficulties in dealing with nine independent elastic constants have precluded this model from being used in seismology. A notation introduced in this work is designed to help make seismic inversion and processing for orthorhombic media more practical by simplifying the description of a wide range of seismic signatures. Taking advantage of the fact that the Christoffel equation has the same form in the symmetry planes of orthorhombic and transversely isotropic (TI) media, we can replace the stiffness coefficients by two vertical (P and S) velocities and seven dimensionless parameters that represent an extension of Thomsen's anisotropy coefficients to orthorhombic models. By design, this notation provides a uniform description of anisotropic media with both orthorhombic and TI symmetry. The dimensionless anisotropic parameters introduced here preserve all attractive features of Thomsen notation in treating wave propagation and performing 2-D processing in the symmetry planes of orthorhombic media. The new notation has proved useful in describing seismic signatures outside the symmetry planes as well, especially for P‐waves. Linearization of P‐wave phase velocity in the anisotropic coefficients leads to a concise weak‐anisotropy approximation that provides good accuracy even for models with pronounced polar and azimuthal velocity variations. This approximation can be used efficiently to build analytic solutions for various seismic signatures. One of the most important advantages of the new notation is the reduction in the number of parameters responsible for P‐wave velocities and traveltimes. All kinematic signatures of P‐waves in orthorhombic media depend on just the vertical velocity [Formula: see text] and five anisotropic parameters, with [Formula: see text] serving as a scaling coefficient in homogeneous media. This conclusion, which holds even for orthorhombic models with strong velocity anisotropy, provides an analytic basis for application of P‐wave traveltime inversion and data processing algorithms in orthorhombic media.

Geometrical spreading of P-waves in horizontally layered, azimuthally anisotropic media

Geophysics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. D43-D53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxia Xu ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin ◽  
Andrés Pech
Keyword(s):  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Anisotropic Media ◽  
Azimuthal Velocity ◽  
Azimuthal Anisotropy ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Geometrical Spreading ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
P Waves ◽  
Anisotropic Models ◽  
Wide Range

For processing and inverting reflection data, it is convenient to represent geometrical spreading through the reflection traveltime measured at the earth's surface. Such expressions are particularly important for azimuthally anisotropic models in which variations of geometrical spreading with both offset and azimuth can significantly distort the results of wide-azimuth amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) analysis. Here, we present an equation for relative geometrical spreading in laterally homogeneous, arbitrarily anisotropic media as a simple function of the spatial derivatives of reflection traveltimes. By employing the Tsvankin-Thomsen nonhyperbolic moveout equation, the spreading is represented through the moveout coefficients, which can be estimated from surface seismic data. This formulation is then applied to P-wave reflections in an orthorhombic layer to evaluate the distortions of the geometrical spreading caused by both polar and azimuthal anisotropy. The relative geometrical spreading of P-waves in homogeneous orthorhombic media is controlled by five parameters that are also responsible for time processing. The weak-anisotropy approximation, verified by numerical tests, shows that azimuthal velocity variations contribute significantly to geometrical spreading, and the existing equations for transversely isotropic media with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI) cannot be applied even in the vertical symmetry planes. The shape of the azimuthally varying spreading factor is close to an ellipse for offsets smaller than the reflector depth but becomes more complicated for larger offset-to-depth ratios. The overall magnitude of the azimuthal variation of the geometrical spreading for the moderately anisotropic model used in the tests exceeds 25% for a wide range of offsets. While the methodology developed here is helpful in modeling and analyzing anisotropic geometrical spreading, its main practical application is in correcting the wide-azimuth AVO signature for the influence of the anisotropic overburden.

Reflection moveout approximations for P-waves in a moderately anisotropic homogeneous tilted transverse isotropy layer

Geophysics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. C175-C185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Pšenčík ◽  
Véronique Farra
Keyword(s):  
Transverse Isotropy ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
P Waves ◽  
3D Space ◽  
Axis Of Symmetry ◽  
Relative Errors ◽  
Symmetry Tests ◽  
Ti Media

We have developed approximate nonhyperbolic P-wave moveout formulas applicable to weakly or moderately anisotropic media of arbitrary anisotropy symmetry and orientation. Instead of the commonly used Taylor expansion of the square of the reflection traveltime in terms of the square of the offset, we expand the square of the reflection traveltime in terms of weak-anisotropy (WA) parameters. No acoustic approximation is used. We specify the formulas designed for anisotropy of arbitrary symmetry for the transversely isotropic (TI) media with the axis of symmetry oriented arbitrarily in the 3D space. Resulting formulas depend on three P-wave WA parameters specifying the TI symmetry and two angles specifying the orientation of the axis of symmetry. Tests of the accuracy of the more accurate of the approximate formulas indicate that maximum relative errors do not exceed 0.3% or 2.5% for weak or moderate P-wave anisotropy, respectively.

Quartic moveout coefficient: 3D description and application to tilted TI media

Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1600-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Pech ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin ◽  
Vladimir Grechka
Keyword(s):  
Heterogeneous Media ◽  
Symmetry Axis ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Individual Values ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
Essential Information ◽  
Ti Media

Nonhyperbolic (long‐spread) moveout provides essential information for a number of seismic inversion/processing applications, particularly for parameter estimation in anisotropic media. Here, we present an analytic expression for the quartic moveout coefficient A4 that controls the magnitude of nonhyperbolic moveout of pure (nonconverted) modes. Our result takes into account reflection‐point dispersal on irregular interfaces and is valid for arbitrarily anisotropic, heterogeneous media. All quantities needed to compute A4 can be evaluated during the tracing of the zero‐offset ray, so long‐spread moveout can be modeled without time‐consuming multioffset, multiazimuth ray tracing. The general equation for the quartic coefficient is then used to study azimuthally varying nonhyperbolic moveout of P‐waves in a dipping transversely isotropic (TI) layer with an arbitrary tilt ν of the symmetry axis. Assuming that the symmetry axis is confined to the dip plane, we employed the weak‐anisotropy approximation to analyze the dependence of A4 on the anisotropic parameters. The linearized expression for A4 is proportional to the anellipticity coefficient η ≈ ε − δ and does not depend on the individual values of the Thomsen parameters. Typically, the magnitude of nonhyperbolic moveout in tilted TI media above a dipping reflector is highest near the reflector strike, whereas deviations from hyperbolic moveout on the dip line are substantial only for mild dips. The azimuthal variation of the quartic coefficient is governed by the tilt ν and reflector dip φ and has a much more complicated character than the NMO–velocity ellipse. For example, if the symmetry axis is vertical (VTI media, ν = 0) and the dip φ < 30°, A4 goes to zero on two lines with different azimuths where it changes sign. If the symmetry axis is orthogonal to the reflector (this model is typical for thrust‐and‐fold belts), the strike‐line quartic coefficient is defined by the well‐known expression for a horizontal VTI layer (i.e., it is independent of dip), while the dip‐line A4 is proportional to cos4 φ and rapidly decreases with dip. The high sensitivity of the quartic moveout coefficient to the parameter η and the tilt of the symmetry axis can be exploited in the inversion of wide‐azimuth, long‐spread P‐wave data for the parameters of TI media.

Quartic moveout coefficient for a dipping azimuthally anisotropic layer

Geophysics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Pech ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Fractured Reservoirs ◽  
Symmetry Plane ◽  
Exact Expression ◽  
Naturally Fractured Reservoirs ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Orthorhombic Symmetry ◽  
Fracture Density ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
Velocity Anisotropy

Interpretation and inversion of azimuthally varying nonhyperbolic reflection moveout requires accounting for both velocity anisotropy and subsurface structure. Here, our previously derived exact expression for the quartic moveout coefficient A4 is applied to P‐wave reflections from a dipping interface overlaid by a medium of orthorhombic symmetry. The weak‐anisotropy approximaton for the coefficient A4 in a homogeneous orthorhombic layer is controlled by the anellipticity parameters η(1), η(2), and η(3), which are responsible for time processing of P‐wave data. If the dip plane of the reflector coincides with the vertical symmetry plane [x1, x3], A4 on the dip line is proportional to the in‐plane anellipticity parameter η(2) and always changes sign for a dip of 30○. The quartic coefficient on the strike line is a function of all three η–parameters, but for mild dips it is mostly governed by η(1)—the parameter defined in the incidence plane [x2, x3]. Whereas the magnitude of the dip line A4 typically becomes small for dips exceeding 45○, the nonhyperbolic moveout on the strike line may remain significant even for subvertical reflectors. The character of the azimuthal variation of A4 depends on reflector dip and is quite sensitive to the signs and relative magnitudes of η(1), η(2), and η(3). The analytic results and numerical modeling show that the azimuthal pattern of the quartic coefficient can contain multiple lobes, with one or two azimuths of vanishing A4 between the dip and strike directions. The strong influence of the anellipticity parameters on the azimuthally varying coefficient A4 suggests that nonhyperbolic moveout recorded in wide‐azimuth surveys can help to constrain the anisotropic velocity field. Since for typical orthorhombic models that describe naturally fractured reservoirs the parameters η(1,2,3) are closely related to the fracture density and infill, the results of azimuthal nonhyperbolic moveout analysis can also be used in reservoir characterization.

Seismic inversion for the parameters of two orthogonal fracture sets in a VTI background medium

Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Bakulin ◽  
Vladimir Grechka ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Fractured Reservoirs ◽  
Crack Density ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Naturally Fractured Reservoirs ◽  
Multiple Fracture ◽  
Effective Parameters ◽  
Wide Range

Characterization of naturally fractured reservoirs often requires estimating parameters of multiple fracture sets that develop in an anisotropic background. Here, we discuss modeling and inversion of the effective parameters of orthorhombic models formed by two orthogonal vertical fracture sets embedded in a VTI (transversely isotropic with a vertical symmetry axis) background matrix. Although the number of the microstructural (physical) medium parameters is equal to the number of effective stiffness elements (nine), we show that for this model there is an additional relation (constraint) between the stiffnesses or Tsvankin's anisotropic coefficients. As a result, the same effective orthorhombic medium can be produced by a wide range of equivalent models with vastly different fracture weaknesses and background VTI parameters, and the inversion of seismic data for the microstructural parameters is nonunique without additional information. Reflection moveout of PP‐ and PS‐waves can still be used to find the fracture orientation and estimate (in combination with the vertical velocities) the differences between the normal and shear weaknesses of the fracture sets, as well as the background anellipticity parameter ηb. Since for penny‐shaped cracks the shear weakness is close to twice the crack density, seismic data can help to identify the dominant fracture set, although the crack densities cannot be resolved individually. If the VTI symmetry of the background is caused by intrinsic anisotropy (as is usually the case for shales), it may be possible to determine at least one background anisotropic coefficient from borehole or core measurements. Then seismic data can be inverted for the fracture weaknesses and the rest of the background parameters. Therefore, seismic characterization of reservoirs with multiple fracture sets and anisotropic background is expected to give ambiguous results, unless the input data include measurements made on different scales (surface seismic, borehole, cores).

Anisotropic velocity analysis for lithology discrimination

Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1564-1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Byun ◽  
D. Corrigan ◽  
J. E. Gaiser
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Velocity ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Wave Model ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Anisotropy ◽  
Transversely Isotropic Media ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Isotropic Media ◽  
Vsp Data

A new velocity analysis technique is presented for analyzing moveout of signals on multichannel surface seismic or VSP data. An approximate, skewed hyperbolic moveout formula is derived for horizontally layered, transversely isotropic media. This formula involves three measurement parameters: the average vertical velocity and horizontal and skew moveout velocities. By extending Dix‐type hyperbolic moveout analysis, we obtain improved coherence over large source‐geophone offsets for more accurate moveout correction. Compared with the stacking velocity obtained by simple hyperbolic analysis methods, the three velocity parameters estimated by this technique contain more physically meaningful geologic information regarding the anisotropy and/or velocity heterogeneity of the subsurface. Synthetic P‐wave model experiments demonstrate that the skewed hyperbolic moveout formula yields an excellent fit to time‐distance curves over a wide range of ray angles. Consequently, the measurement parameters are shown to reflect adequately the characteristics of velocity dependence on ray angle, i.e., velocity anisotropy. The technique is then applied to two field offset VSP data sets to measure and analyze the velocity parameters. The results show that the apparent anisotropy, defined as the ratio between the horizontal moveout velocity and average vertical velocity, correlates reasonably well with lithology. Highly anisotropic shale and chalk exhibit higher horizontal‐to‐vertical velocity ratios and sandstones show lower ratios.

Geometrical spreading in a layered transversely isotropic medium with vertical symmetry axis

Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 2082-2091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjørn Ursin ◽  
Ketil Hokstad
Keyword(s):  
Ray Tracing ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Symmetry Axis ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Analytical Approximation ◽  
Geometrical Spreading ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
P Waves ◽  
Amplitude Versus

Compensation for geometrical spreading is important in prestack Kirchhoff migration and in amplitude versus offset/amplitude versus angle (AVO/AVA) analysis of seismic data. We present equations for the relative geometrical spreading of reflected and transmitted P‐ and S‐wave in horizontally layered transversely isotropic media with vertical symmetry axis (VTI). We show that relatively simple expressions are obtained when the geometrical spreading is expressed in terms of group velocities. In weakly anisotropic media, we obtain simple expressions also in terms of phase velocities. Also, we derive analytical equations for geometrical spreading based on the nonhyperbolic traveltime formula of Tsvankin and Thomsen, such that the geometrical spreading can be expressed in terms of the parameters used in time processing of seismic data. Comparison with numerical ray tracing demonstrates that the weak anisotropy approximation to geometrical spreading is accurate for P‐waves. It is less accurate for SV‐waves, but has qualitatively the correct form. For P waves, the nonhyperbolic equation for geometrical spreading compares favorably with ray‐tracing results for offset‐depth ratios less than five. For SV‐waves, the analytical approximation is accurate only at small offsets, and breaks down at offset‐depth ratios less than unity. The numerical results are in agreement with the range of validity for the nonhyperbolic traveltime equations.

Anisotropic geometrical-spreading correction for wide-azimuth P-wave reflections

Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. D161-D170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxia Xu ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Azimuthal Anisotropy ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Fractured Reservoir ◽  
Geometrical Spreading ◽  
Spreading Factor ◽  
Velocity Anisotropy ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Fitting Procedure ◽  
Avo Attributes

Compensation for geometrical spreading along a raypath is one of the key steps in AVO (amplitude-variation-with-offset) analysis, in particular, for wide-azimuth surveys. Here, we propose an efficient methodology to correct long-spread, wide-azimuth reflection data for geometrical spreading in stratified azimuthally anisotropic media. The P-wave geometrical-spreading factor is expressed through the reflection traveltime described by a nonhyperbolic moveout equation that has the same form as in VTI (transversely isotropic with a vertical symmetry axis) media. The adapted VTI equation is parameterized by the normal-moveout (NMO) ellipse and the azimuthally varying anellipticity parameter [Formula: see text]. To estimate the moveout parameters, we apply a 3D nonhyperbolic semblance algorithm of Vasconcelos and Tsvankin that operates simultaneously with traces at all offsets andazimuths. The estimated moveout parameters are used as the input in our geometrical-spreading computation. Numerical tests for models composed of orthorhombic layers with strong, depth-varying velocity anisotropy confirm the high accuracy of our travetime-fitting procedure and, therefore, of the geometrical-spreading correction. Because our algorithm is based entirely on the kinematics of reflection arrivals, it can be incorporated readily into the processing flow of azimuthal AVO analysis. In combination with the nonhyperbolic moveout inversion, we apply our method to wide-azimuth P-wave data collected at the Weyburn field in Canada. The geometrical-spreading factor for the reflection from the top of the fractured reservoir is clearly influenced by azimuthal anisotropy in the overburden, which should cause distortions in the azimuthal AVO attributes. This case study confirms that the azimuthal variation of the geometrical-spreading factor often is comparable to or exceeds that of the reflection coefficient.

Normal moveout from dipping reflectors in anisotropic media

Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Symmetry Axis ◽  
Transverse Isotropy ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Anisotropic Media ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
Anisotropic Models ◽  
Transversely Isotropic Media ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Isotropic Media ◽  
The Difference

Description of reflection moveout from dipping interfaces is important in developing seismic processing methods for anisotropic media, as well as in the inversion of reflection data. Here, I present a concise analytic expression for normal‐moveout (NMO) velocities valid for a wide range of homogeneous anisotropic models including transverse isotropy with a tilted in‐plane symmetry axis and symmetry planes in orthorhombic media. In transversely isotropic media, NMO velocity for quasi‐P‐waves may deviate substantially from the isotropic cosine‐of‐dip dependence used in conventional constant‐velocity dip‐moveout (DMO) algorithms. However, numerical studies of NMO velocities have revealed no apparent correlation between the conventional measures of anisotropy and errors in the cosine‐of‐dip DMO correction (“DMO errors”). The analytic treatment developed here shows that for transverse isotropy with a vertical symmetry axis, the magnitude of DMO errors is dependent primarily on the difference between Thomsen parameters ε and δ. For the most common case, ε − δ > 0, the cosine‐of‐dip–corrected moveout velocity remains significantly larger than the moveout velocity for a horizontal reflector. DMO errors at a dip of 45 degrees may exceed 20–25 percent, even for weak anisotropy. By comparing analytically derived NMO velocities with moveout velocities calculated on finite spreads, I analyze anisotropy‐induced deviations from hyperbolic moveout for dipping reflectors. For transversely isotropic media with a vertical velocity gradient and typical (positive) values of the difference ε − δ, inhomogeneity tends to reduce (sometimes significantly) the influence of anisotropy on the dip dependence of moveout velocity.

scholarly journals Seismic AVOA Inversion for Weak Anisotropy Parameters and Fracture Density in a Monoclinic Medium

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 5136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zijian Ge ◽  
Shulin Pan ◽  
Jingye Li
Keyword(s):  
Fractured Rock ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
Fracture Density ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
Amplitude Versus Offset ◽  
Porosity And Permeability ◽  
Transverse Isotropic

In shale gas development, fracture density is an important lithologic parameter to properly characterize reservoir reconstruction, establish a fracturing scheme, and calculate porosity and permeability. The traditional methods usually assume that the fracture reservoir is one set of aligned vertical fractures, embedded in an isotropic background, and estimate some alternative parameters associated with fracture density. Thus, the low accuracy caused by this simplified model, and the intrinsic errors caused by the indirect substitution, affect the estimation of fracture density. In this paper, the fractured rock of monoclinic symmetry assumes two non-orthogonal vertical fracture sets, embedded in a transversely isotropic background. Firstly, assuming that the fracture radius, width, and orientation are known, a new form of P-wave reflection coefficient, in terms of weak anisotropy (WA) parameters and fracture density, was obtained by substituting the stiffness coefficients of vertical transverse isotropic (VTI) background, normal, and tangential fracture compliances. Then, a linear amplitude versus offset and azimuth (AVOA) inversion method, of WA parameters and fracture density, was constructed by using Bayesian theory. Tests on synthetic data showed that WA parameters, and fracture density, are stably estimated in the case of seismic data containing a moderate noise, which can provide a reliable tool in fracture prediction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document