Hydrogeologic assessment of the Amchitka Island nuclear test site (Alaska) with magnetotellurics

Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. B47-B57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martyn Unsworth ◽  
Wolfgang Soyer ◽  
Volkan Tuncer ◽  
Anna Wagner ◽  
David Barnes
Keyword(s):  
Marine Environment ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Nuclear Testing ◽  
Test Program ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
Transit Times ◽  
Underground Nuclear Testing ◽  
Radionuclide Release

Amchitka Island, in Alaska, was used for underground nuclear testing from 1965 to 1971. Since the test program concluded, there have been concerns about the possible release of radionuclides into the marine environment of the Aleutian Islands. The hydrogeology of islands such as Amchitka is characterized by a layer of freshwater overlying a saltwater layer, with the salinity increasing across a transition zone (TZ). Hydrogeologic modeling can provide an estimate of the timing and amount of radionuclide release from the explosions beneath Amchitka Island. This modeling is inconclusive because of a lack of information regarding subsurface structure. To address this problem, magnetotelluric (MT) data were collected on Amchitka Island in 2004. Broadband MT data were recorded on profiles passing through three explosion sites to give information about subsurface porosity and salinity. A 2D MT inversion produced models of sub-surface electrical resistivity and showed a pattern of increasing, decreasing, and increasing resistivity with depth at each test site. The depth at which resistivity begins to decrease defines the top of the TZ. The deeper increase in resistivity approximates the base of the TZ. The depths of the top and bottom of the TZ were determined as follows: Cannikin 900–2500 m; Long Shot 600–1700 m; Milrow 900–1700 m. Uncertainties were estimated for these depths. Effective porosities were also estimated and ranged from 10%–20% at the surface to 1%–3% at 3-km depth. These porosities are higher than those assumed in several hydrogeologic models, and give longer transit times from the explosion to the marine environment. Subject to the limits of the analysis, it appears that each of the cavities resulting from underground nuclear explosions is located in the TZ from fresh to saltwater. This implies shorter transit times to the marine environment than if the detonations had been located in the saltwater layer.

Study of low-magnitude seismic events near the Novaya Zemlya nuclear test site

1997 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 1563-1575
Author(s):  
Frode Ringdal
Keyword(s):  
Monitoring Network ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Nuclear Test ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Scaling Effects ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Novaya Zemlya ◽  
Source Scaling ◽  
Low Magnitude

Abstract A study of available seismic data shows that all but one of the 42 known underground nuclear explosions at Novaya Zemlya have been detected and located by stations in the global seismic network. During the past 30 years, only one seismic event in this area has been unambiguously classified as an earthquake (1 August 1986, mb = 4.3). Several other small events, most of which are thought to be either chemical explosions or aftereffects of nuclear explosions, have also been detected. Since 1990, a network of sensitive regional arrays has been installed in northern Europe in preparation for the global seismic monitoring network under a comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty (CTBT). This regional network has provided a detection capability for Novaya Zemlya that is shown to be close to mb = 2.5. Three low-magnitude events have been detected and located during this period, as discussed in this article: 31 December 1992 (mb = 2.7), 13 June 1995 (mb = 3.5), and 13 January 1996 (mb = 2.4). To classify the source types of these events has proved very difficult. Thus, even for the mb = 3.5 event in 1995, we have been unable to provide a confident classification of the source as either an earthquake or explosion using the available discriminants. A study of mb magnitude in different frequency bands shows, as expected, that the calculation of mb at regional distances needs to take into account source-scaling effects at high frequencies. Thus, when comparing a 4 to 8 or 8 to 16 Hz filter band to a “teleseismic” 2 to 4 Hz band, the smaller events have, relatively speaking, significantly more high-frequency energy (up to 0.5 mb units) than the larger events. This suggests that a P-wave spectral magnitude scale might be appropriate. The problem of accurately locating small events using a sparse array network is addressed using the 13 January 1996 event, which was detected by only two arrays, as an illustrative example. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of using accurately calibrated regional travel-time curves and, at the same time, illustrates how array processing can be used to identify an interfering phase from a local disturbance, thereby avoiding location errors due to erroneous phase readings.

Evidence of tectonic release from underground nuclear explosions in long-period P waves

1983 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 593-613
Author(s):  
Terry C. Wallace ◽  
Donald V. Helmberger ◽  
Gladys R. Engen
Keyword(s):  
Upper Mantle ◽  
High Stress ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Body Waves ◽  
Release Time ◽  
P Waves ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Long Period

abstract In this paper, we study the long-period body waves at regional and upper mantle distances from large underground nuclear explosions at Pahute Mesa, Nevada Test Site. A comparison of the seismic records from neighboring explosions shows that the more recent events have much simpler waveforms than those of the earlier events. In fact, many of the early events produced waveforms which are very similar to those produced by shallow, moderate-size, strike-slip earthquakes; the phase sP is particularly obvious. The waveforms of these explosions can be modeled by assuming that the explosion is accompanied by tectonic release represented by a double couple. A clear example of this phenomenon is provided by a comparison of GREELEY (1966) and KASSERI (1975). These events are of similar yields and were detonated within 2 km of each other. The GREELEY records can be matched by simply adding synthetic waveforms appropriate for a shallow strike-slip earthquake to the KASSERI observations. The tectonic release for GREELEY has a moment of 5 ՠ1024 dyne-cm and is striking approximately 340°. The identification of the sP phase at upper mantle distances indicates that the source depth is 4 km or less. The tectonic release time function has a short duration (less than 1 sec). A comparison of these results with well-studied strike-slip earthquakes on the west coast and eastern Nevada indicate that, if tectonic release is triggered fault motion, then the tectonic release is relatively high stress drop, on the order of several hundred bars. It is possible to reduce these stress drops by a factor of 2 if the tectonic release is a driven fault; i.e., rupturing with the P velocity. The region in which the stress is released for a megaton event has a radius of about 4 km. Pahute Mesa events which are detonated within this radius of a previous explosion have a substantially reduced tectonic release.

Seismic effects of the MILROW and CANNIKIN nuclear explosions

1972 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1411-1423 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. R. Engdahl
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Test Site ◽  
High Gain ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Upper Crust ◽  
Seismic Effects ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Nuclear Explosions

abstract Seismic effects of the underground nuclear explosions MILROW (October 1969, about 1 megaton) and CANNIKIN (November 1971, under 5 megatons) were monitored by a network of continuously recording, high-frequency, high-gain seismographs located on Amchitka and nearby islands. Each explosion was immediately followed by hundreds of small, discrete events (mB < 4), of similar focal mechanism and with a characteristic low-frequency signature, which were apparently related to the deterioration of the explosion cavity. This activity intensified, then terminated within minutes of a large, complex multiple event and concurrent formation of a surface subsided area that signaled complete collapse of the explosion cavity (MILROW, 37 hr; CANNIKIN, 38 hr). A number of small explosion-stimulated tectonic events, apparently unrelated to the collapse phenomenon, occurred intermittently for several weeks following each explosion—near the explosion cavity and up to 13 km southeast of CANNIKIN ground zero along the Island. These events were confined to the upper crust of the Island, had characteristic high-frequency signatures, and, near the Rifle Range Fault, had focal mechanisms which could be correlated with pre-existing faulting. The evidence points to a short-term interaction of the explosions with local ambient tectonic stresses. Because these stresses are of relatively low level on Amchitka, the observed seismic effects were significantly less extensive and smaller than similar effects reported from high-yield explosions at the Nevada Test Site. Continuous monitoring of the natural seismicity of the Amchitka region since 1969 has not revealed other evidence for an interaction between either MILROW or CANNIKIN and natural tectonic processes. The structural stability and apparent low level of stress in the upper crust of Amchitka suggest that the Island effectively is seismically decoupled from the active subduction zone below.

Strain effects of nuclear explosions in Nevada

1971 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Boucher ◽  
Stephen D. Malone ◽  
E. Fred Homuth
Keyword(s):  
Body Wave ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Strain Effects ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Static Strain ◽  
Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Shot Point ◽  
A Minor ◽  
The University

abstract The University of Nevada's three-component quartz-rod strain meter installation at Round Mountain, Nevada (38°42.1′N, 117°04.6′W) has recorded a number of underground nuclear explosions at the Nevada Test Site, beginning with the megaton-sized JORUM event September 16 1969. Both that explosion and the larger HANDLEY event on March 26 1970 produced static strain offsets of a few parts in 109 at Round Mountain. These offsets did not decay within the first few hours after the explosions. In both cases, the strain offsets were in the sense of ground extension radial to the shot point, which is inconsistent with the assumption of a pure compressive source of strain. The strain-change ellipse for the HANDLEY event was found to have a major strain axis of 11 × 10−9 extensional, oriented N 34°W, and a minor axis of 7.4 × 10−9 compressional. A single-component strain meter at Mina, Nevada, (38°26.3′N, 118°9.3′W) was operated for the HANDLEY event, and recorded a strain offset of 2.6 × 10−9 in the direction N 74°E. Strain offsets at the time of the largest collapse events following HANDLEY were observed at Round Mountain. These offsets had the same sense on each component as those following the explosion itself. This is interpreted as support for the hypothesis that the strain changes are tectonic in origin, and the explosion initiates the strain release. Small offsets were observed for three smaller explosions out of a total of 13 studied. The relationship between body-wave magnitude mb and maximum dynamic strains at Round Mountain may be described empirically by the equation Log S = − 13.4 + 1.10 mb. Because of its high sensitivity and stability, the Round Mountain strain meter is capable of obtaining useful measurements of dynamic and static strain effects of intermediate- to large-sized explosions, at distances ranging from 160 to 200 km.

Lg magnitudes and yield estimates for underground Novaya Zemlya nuclear explosions

1988 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 873-884
Author(s):  
Otto W. Nuttli
Keyword(s):  
Large Range ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Nevada Test Site ◽  
P Values ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Novaya Zemlya ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Lg Wave ◽  
Range Of Values

Abstract Lg-wave amplitudes of 30 Novaya Zemlya underground nuclear explosions, as recorded by short-period seismographs in Denmark, Finland, Germany, Norway, Spitsbergen, and Sweden, are used to determine mb(Lg) values. Assuming that the mb(Lg) versus explosion yield relation derived from Nevada Test Site data applies to all continental areas, the yields of the explosions are estimated. They cover a large range of values, from 2.5 to 4900 kt. The largest explosion since April 1976 had an estimated yield of 145 kt. The mb(Lg) values, when subtracted from the mb(P) values, can be used to estimate the mb(P) bias between two test sites. In this way, the mb(P) bias between Novaya Zemlya and the Nevada Test Site is estimated to be 0.20 magnitude units.

Effects of Secondary Sources of Underground Nuclear Explosions on the mb : Ms Criterion and Implications for Discrimination of the DPRK’s Nuclear Tests

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henglei Xu ◽  
Sidao Ni ◽  
Ping Jin ◽  
Shiban Ding ◽  
Hongchun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Body Wave ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Nuclear Test ◽  
Source Spectrum ◽  
Secondary Source ◽  
Underground Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Nuclear Explosions ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
Nuclear Tests ◽  
Recognition Criterion

ABSTRACT The mb :  Ms (mb vs. Ms) relationship is an important criterion for screening explosions from earthquakes and has been widely adopted in seismological monitoring by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. In general, the earthquakes have larger Ms than the underground explosions with equivalent mb. However, it has been reported that this recognition criterion failed to identify some explosions at the North Korea nuclear test site. In this study, we investigate the potential effects of secondary source components, including the compensated linear vector dipole (CLVD) and double-couple (DC) sources, on mb and Ms magnitude measurements and the physical mechanism of the mb :  Ms recognition criterion by calculating synthetic seismograms. The results show an apparent critical body-wave magnitude of 5 when using the mb :  Ms method to discriminate North Korean underground nuclear explosions. The Ms measurements decrease as the CLVD components increase, whereas the effects from the DC source can be neglected. Small events, such as the first five North Korean nuclear tests, generate weak CLVD components, leading to the failure of mb :  Ms-based discrimination, whereas the last event, with a larger magnitude, caused extensive damage and hence can be successfully discriminated. In addition, the large difference between the source spectrum of explosions and those of earthquakes might be another important factor in the successful mb :  Ms-based discrimination of the sixth North Korean nuclear test.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document