Optimizing Cardiovascular Care in Children With Acute Myeloid Leukemia to Improve Cancer-Related Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saro H. Armenian ◽  
Matthew J. Ehrhardt
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Laboratory Evaluation ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Lv Systolic Function ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors’ suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice. A 14-year-old African American female presented with fatigue, easy bruising, and fever. On examination, she had scattered bruising, lymphadenopathy, and hepatosplenomegaly. Laboratory evaluation revealed pancytopenia with peripheral blasts, and acute myeloid leukemia (AML; French-American-British M2, t[8;21][q22;q22.1]) was diagnosed on bone marrow biopsy. A baseline echocardiogram revealed normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function (ejection fraction [EF], 60%; shortening fraction [SF], 32%), and conventional chemotherapy was initiated that consisted of two cycles of remission induction (cytarabine, etoposide, and daunorubicin [50 mg/m2 × 3 days per cycle]) followed by intensification 1 (high-dose cytarabine and etoposide), intensification 2 (high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone [12 mg/m2/dose daily; four total doses]), and intensification 3 (high-dose cytarabine and l-asparaginase). Of note, an echocardiogram was not repeated before the start of intensification 1. During intensification 1, the patient developed Streptococcus viridans sepsis, which required 4 days in the intensive care unit with antimicrobial and inotropic support. Repeat echocardiogram after recovery from the sepsis episode demonstrated low-normal LV systolic function (EF, 53%; SF, 27%), and she subsequently began intensification 2. On day 3 of intensification 2, the patient developed afebrile tachypnea, tachycardia, and an increasing oxygen requirement. Chest x-ray revealed cardiomegaly and pulmonary vascular congestion. Cardiac troponins were normal, whereas N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide was 10 times the upper limit of normal. Repeat echocardiogram showed an enlarged LV with moderate to severely depressed LV function (EF, 28%; SF, 14%). Day 4 mitoxantrone was omitted and a cardiology consult obtained.

Optimization of Chemotherapy for Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of the Medical Research Council AML15 Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (27) ◽  
pp. 3360-3368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan K. Burnett ◽  
Nigel H. Russell ◽  
Robert K. Hills ◽  
Ann E. Hunter ◽  
Lars Kjeldsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose Treatment outcomes in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved, but optimization and new combinations are needed. We assess three combinations in induction and consolidation. Patients and Methods Younger untreated patients with AML (median age, 49 years; range, 0 to 73 years) were randomly allocated to two induction courses of daunorubicin and cytarabine (DA) with or without etoposide (ADE; n = 1983) or ADE versus fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida; n = 1268), and to amsacrine, cytarabine, etoposide, and then mitoxantrone/cytarabine (MACE-MidAC) or high-dose cytarabine (n = 1,445) 3 g/m2 or 1.5 g/m2 (n = 657) in consolidation, and finally to a fifth course (cytarabine) or not (n = 227). Results Overall remission rates were similar for DA versus ADE (84% v 86%; P = .14) and ADE versus FLAG-Ida (86% v 85%; P = .7), with more course 1 remissions after FLAG-Ida (77%) reducing relapse (38% v 55%; P < .001) and improving relapse-free survival (45% v 34%; P = .01), overall and in subgroups, but with increased myelosuppression, reducing participation in the consolidation randomization. Overall outcomes were similar between MACE/MidAc and high-dose cytarabine (1.5/3.0 g/m2), but cytarabine required less supportive care. MACE/MidAc was superior for high-risk patients. A fifth course provided no benefit. The outcome for recipients of only two FLAG-Ida courses were not different from that with DA/ADE with consolidation. Conclusion FLAG-Ida is an effective remission induction treatment, with a high complete remission rate after course 1 and reduced relapse. Consolidation with MACE/MidAc is similar overall to high-dose cytarabine, but superior in high-risk patients. Cytarabine at 1.5 g/m2 is equivalent to a 3 g/m2 dose. A fifth course is unnecessary. In patients receiving FLAG-Ida (two courses) and cytarabine (two courses), 8-year survival was 63% for patients with intermediate-risk and 95% for those with favorable-risk disease.

Impact of high-dose cytarabine and asparaginase intensification on childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Childrens Cancer Group.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 538-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Wells ◽  
W G Woods ◽  
B C Lampkin ◽  
M E Nesbit ◽  
J W Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Myeloid

PURPOSE The purpose of this review was to determine the impact of high-dose cytarabine and asparaginase intensification, administered shortly after remission induction, on the outcome of childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MATERIALS AND METHODS Three consecutive Childrens Cancer Group (CCG) trials of acute myeloid leukemia, CCG 251 (1979 to 1983), CCG 213P (1983 to 1985), and CCG 213 (1985 to 1989) with a total of 1,294 patients, were reviewed and provide the basis of this report. RESULTS CCG 213P demonstrated the importance of dose interval, in that two courses of cytarabine and asparaginase administered at 7-day intervals gave superior 5-year survival rates (58% v 41% from the end of induction, P < .04) to the same therapy administered at 28-day intervals. CCG 213 showed that there was no advantage to the maintenance therapy used for patients who received two courses of cytarabine and asparaginase at 7-day intervals (5-year survival, 68% [no maintenance] v 44% [maintenance] from the end of consolidation, P < .01). Inclusion of the 7-day interval cytarabine/asparaginase intensification was accompanied by an overall improvement in 5-year survival rates from diagnosis when compared with historical controls (CCG 213, 36% v CCG 251, 29%, P < .02) although other differences between these studies could also be responsible for the improvement seen. CONCLUSION High-dose cytarabine and asparaginase intensification eliminated the benefit of prolonged maintenance therapy in childhood AML and was accompanied by an overall improvement in survival.

scholarly journals Clinical Impact of an Accurate Genetic Characterization of Older Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Report from the Northern Italy Leukemia Group (NILG) Randomized Trial 02/06

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 434-434
Author(s):  
Chiara Caprioli ◽  
Tamara Intermesoli ◽  
Orietta Spinelli ◽  
Silvia Salmoiraghi ◽  
Pamela Zanghì ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Genetic Characterization ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) older age is independently associated with poor outcome, due to patient- and disease-related factors. Different genetic profiles characterize AML patients and their frequency varies according to age. Their identification can improve early risk stratification to select the most appropriate therapy, including alternative, not chemotherapy based, treatment modalities, such as hypomethylating and targeted agents (Döhner H et al., Blood 2017). We analyzed the clinical outcome of AML patients aged ≥60 years who were enrolled in the randomized multicentric trial NILG 02/06, and were deeply genetically characterized (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT00495287). Patients and Methods Five hundred seventy-four newly diagnosed AML patients were enrolled into the study and 168 were aged ≥60 years; all patients were randomized to receive conventional induction chemotherapy with idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide (ICE) or sequential high-dose cytarabine and idarubicin (sHD), followed by consolidation courses with high dose cytarabine (Bassan R et al., annual congress EHA. Jun 9, 2016, abstr S485). Genetic characterization at diagnosis was obtained by conventional cytogenetics and RT-PCR for 145 and 168 patients, respectively, while Next Generation Sequencing was performed for 51 patients with normal karyotype. Patients were re-classified as per the 2017 European Leukemia Net (ELN) guidelines (Döhner H et al., Blood 2017). A myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN) related genetic signature was defined according to cytogenetic WHO criteria and/or molecular abnormalities known to be associated with MDS/MPN (Bullinger L et al., J Clin Oncol 2017) and used for outcome correlation. Results The characteristics of patients are summarized in Table 1. According to the ELN risk stratification, patients were classified as favorable, intermediate or adverse risk (23%, 38% and 39% of patients, respectively). A genetic MDS/MPN signature was demonstrated in 42% of patients (63/149), which was a higher proportion compared to that of patients with a clinical diagnosis of an antecedent MDS/MPN (19% of patients, 32/168). No significant difference was observed between the induction regimens regarding the achievement of complete remission (CR) (71% for sHD and 61% for ICE, P=0.23) and early death rate (12% and 10.6%, P=0.96). After achieving CR, a median of 2 consolidation courses was administered (range 1-5) within both treatment arms. A limited proportion of patients with high-risk genetic or clinical features (14%) had the opportunity to undergo an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT), the majority of them (63%) receiving a reduced intensity conditioning. By intention to treat, 5-years overall survival (OS) and disease- free survival (DFS) on the whole study population were 29% and 32% respectively, without significant differences between the remission induction treatment (for sHD and ICE, OS: 29% and 28%, P=0.88; DFS: 34% and 29%, P=0.90). According to the ELN risk stratification, 5-years OS was 68%, 25% and 7% for favorable, intermediate and adverse groups (P<0.0001), while 3-years DFS was 73%, 28% and 13% (P<0.0001) (Figure 1A). According to the presence or absence of a MDS/MPN signature at diagnosis, 5-years OS was 11% vs 41% (P=0.0001) while 3-years DFS was 12% vs 49% (P<0.0001) (Figure 1B). AlloHSCT was associated with a significant benefit in terms of 5-years OS (57% vs 25%, P=0.0162) and DFS (53% vs 26%, P=0.0363) (Figure 1C). As expected, age had also an impact, with patients aged 60-64 years performing better than patients aged ≥65 years (5-years OS 38% vs 13%, P=0.003; 5-years DFS 43% vs 10%, P=0.002). Conclusions Older AML patients with favorable risk features according to ELN benefit from standard chemotherapy. The definition of an adverse genetic risk profile and particularly of a MDS/MPN signature is crucial to identify patients who have a very dismal outcome. These patients should be considered for alternative, innovative treatment options. In high-risk, ≥60 years old AML patients with a good performance status, alloHSCT significantly improves both OS and DFS and should always be considered as the most effective post consolidation treatment. Disclosures Cattaneo: GILEAD: Other: Advisory Board. Cortelezzi:janssen: Consultancy; novartis: Consultancy; abbvie: Consultancy; roche: Consultancy. Rambaldi:Italfarmaco: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Sense and nonsense of high-dose cytarabine for acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bob Löwenberg
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Leukemia Treatment ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract High-dose cytarabine applied during remission induction or as consolidation after attainment of a complete remission has become an established element in the treatment of adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Recent evidence has challenged the need for these exceptionally high-dose levels of cytarabine. In this review, we present a reappraisal of the usefulness of high-dose cytarabine for acute myeloid leukemia treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document