Impact of high-dose cytarabine and asparaginase intensification on childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Childrens Cancer Group.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 538-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Wells ◽  
W G Woods ◽  
B C Lampkin ◽  
M E Nesbit ◽  
J W Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Myeloid

PURPOSE The purpose of this review was to determine the impact of high-dose cytarabine and asparaginase intensification, administered shortly after remission induction, on the outcome of childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MATERIALS AND METHODS Three consecutive Childrens Cancer Group (CCG) trials of acute myeloid leukemia, CCG 251 (1979 to 1983), CCG 213P (1983 to 1985), and CCG 213 (1985 to 1989) with a total of 1,294 patients, were reviewed and provide the basis of this report. RESULTS CCG 213P demonstrated the importance of dose interval, in that two courses of cytarabine and asparaginase administered at 7-day intervals gave superior 5-year survival rates (58% v 41% from the end of induction, P < .04) to the same therapy administered at 28-day intervals. CCG 213 showed that there was no advantage to the maintenance therapy used for patients who received two courses of cytarabine and asparaginase at 7-day intervals (5-year survival, 68% [no maintenance] v 44% [maintenance] from the end of consolidation, P < .01). Inclusion of the 7-day interval cytarabine/asparaginase intensification was accompanied by an overall improvement in 5-year survival rates from diagnosis when compared with historical controls (CCG 213, 36% v CCG 251, 29%, P < .02) although other differences between these studies could also be responsible for the improvement seen. CONCLUSION High-dose cytarabine and asparaginase intensification eliminated the benefit of prolonged maintenance therapy in childhood AML and was accompanied by an overall improvement in survival.

scholarly journals Varying intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1924-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
PA Cassileth ◽  
E Lynch ◽  
JD Hines ◽  
MM Oken ◽  
JJ Mazza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a randomized trial in patients less than or equal to 65 years old (median, 44 years) to determine whether increasing the intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) would improve the outcome. After uniform induction therapy, patients in complete remission (CR) who were less than 41 years old and who had a histocompatible sibling underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) (54 patients). The remainder of patients in CR were randomized to receive either 2 years of continuous outpatient maintenance therapy with cytarabine and 6- thioguanine (83 patients) or a single course of inpatient consolidation therapy consisting of 6 days of high-dose cytarabine plus 3 days of amsacrine (87 patients). The median duration of follow-up is now 4 years, and patients are included in the analyses of outcome regardless of whether they relapsed before starting the intended treatment. Four- year event-free survival (EFS) was 27% +/- 10% for consolidation therapy versus 16% +/- 8% for maintenance therapy (P = .068) and 28% +/- 11% versus 15% +/- 9% (P = .047) in patients less than 60 years old. The outcome for patients receiving alloBMT was compared with the subset of patients less than 41 years old who received consolidation therapy (N = 29) or maintenance therapy (N = 21). Four-year EFS was 42% +/- 13% for alloBMT, 30% +/- 17% for consolidation therapy, and 14% +/- 15% for maintenance therapy. AlloBMT had a significantly better EFS (P = .013) than maintenance therapy, but was not different from consolidation therapy. In patients less than 41 years old, 4-year survival after alloBMT (42% +/- 14%) did not differ from consolidation therapy (43% +/- 18%), but both were significantly better than maintenance therapy (19% +/- 17%), P = .047 and .043, respectively. The mortality rate for maintenance therapy was 0%, consolidation therapy, 21%; and alloBMT, 36%. Consolidation therapy caused an especially high mortality rate in the patients greater than or equal to 60 years old (8 of 14 or 57%). The toxicity of combined high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine is unacceptable, especially in older patients, and alternative approaches to consolidation therapy such as high-dose cytarabine alone need to be tested. In AML, a single course of consolidation therapy or alloBMT after initial CR produces better results than lengthy maintenance therapy. Although EFS and survival of alloBMT and consolidation therapy do not differ significantly, a larger number of patients need to be studied before concluding that they are equivalent.

Optimizing Cardiovascular Care in Children With Acute Myeloid Leukemia to Improve Cancer-Related Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saro H. Armenian ◽  
Matthew J. Ehrhardt
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Laboratory Evaluation ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Lv Systolic Function ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors’ suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice. A 14-year-old African American female presented with fatigue, easy bruising, and fever. On examination, she had scattered bruising, lymphadenopathy, and hepatosplenomegaly. Laboratory evaluation revealed pancytopenia with peripheral blasts, and acute myeloid leukemia (AML; French-American-British M2, t[8;21][q22;q22.1]) was diagnosed on bone marrow biopsy. A baseline echocardiogram revealed normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function (ejection fraction [EF], 60%; shortening fraction [SF], 32%), and conventional chemotherapy was initiated that consisted of two cycles of remission induction (cytarabine, etoposide, and daunorubicin [50 mg/m2 × 3 days per cycle]) followed by intensification 1 (high-dose cytarabine and etoposide), intensification 2 (high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone [12 mg/m2/dose daily; four total doses]), and intensification 3 (high-dose cytarabine and l-asparaginase). Of note, an echocardiogram was not repeated before the start of intensification 1. During intensification 1, the patient developed Streptococcus viridans sepsis, which required 4 days in the intensive care unit with antimicrobial and inotropic support. Repeat echocardiogram after recovery from the sepsis episode demonstrated low-normal LV systolic function (EF, 53%; SF, 27%), and she subsequently began intensification 2. On day 3 of intensification 2, the patient developed afebrile tachypnea, tachycardia, and an increasing oxygen requirement. Chest x-ray revealed cardiomegaly and pulmonary vascular congestion. Cardiac troponins were normal, whereas N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide was 10 times the upper limit of normal. Repeat echocardiogram showed an enlarged LV with moderate to severely depressed LV function (EF, 28%; SF, 14%). Day 4 mitoxantrone was omitted and a cardiology consult obtained.

Successful use of high-dose cytarabine in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia and severe hepatic dysfunction

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 811-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob A Barker ◽  
Bernard L Marini ◽  
Dale Bixby ◽  
Anthony J Perissinotti
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hepatic Dysfunction ◽  
Hematologic Malignancy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Acute myeloid leukemia is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal expansion of myeloid blasts in the peripheral blood, bone marrow, and other tissues. Prognosis is poor with 5-year survival rates ranging from 5–65% depending on demographic and clinical features. Outcomes are worse for patients that have an antecedent myeloproliferative neoplasm that evolves to acute myeloid leukemia, with a survival rate of <10%. Treatment for acute myeloid leukemia has remained cytarabine and an anthracycline given in the standard 3 + 7 regimen. However, for patients with liver dysfunction this regimen, among many others, cannot be given safely. There is currently a lack of data regarding the use of cytarabine in patients with severe hepatic dysfunction. In this case report, we present a patient with secondary acute myeloid leukemia who successfully received a modified regimen of high-dose cytarabine while in severe hepatic dysfunction (bilirubin >15 mg/dL).

Alpha Hemolytic Streptococcal Infection During Intensive Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report From the Children’s Cancer Group Study CCG-2891

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1845-1855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan S. Gamis ◽  
William B. Howells ◽  
Joetta DeSwarte-Wallace ◽  
James H. Feusner ◽  
Jonathan D. Buckley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Associated Risk Factors ◽  
Acute Myeloid

PURPOSE: Past reports indicate that alpha hemolytic streptococcal (AHS) organisms are a common cause of infection among acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. This study was intended to ascertain the population incidence and rate (infections per 100 patient-days of treatment) of AHS and to identify associated risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 874 with 151,350 days of risk) enrolled on the Children’s Cancer Group (CCG) protocol for newly diagnosed AML, CCG-2891, which randomly assigned intensity of induction and intensification, were prospectively evaluated for infectious complications. RESULTS: AHS occurred in 21% of patients, was primarily blood borne (86%), made up 21% of bacteremic infections, and had a recurrent incidence of 31% during subsequent therapy. AHS was more often life-threatening (59%) than other infections (41%) (P = .001). AHS rates increased with age less than 10 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; P = .007), intensively timed induction (OR, 1.8 to 1.9; P = .02), and high-dose cytarabine intensification (OR, 3.7; P < .0001). Among all courses, the greatest incidence (19%) and rate (0.41) were associated with the use of high-dose cytarabine. Gastrointestinal toxicity correlated significantly with AHS bacteremia (P < .01). Infection with AHS resulted in increased hospital days (P = .0001). Only among bone marrow transplant patients were overall survival (OR, 2.8; P = .0001) and disease-free survival (OR, 2.1; P = .008) decreased after AHS bacteremia. CONCLUSION: This study, the first to prospectively examine AHS incidence among uniformly treated patients in multiple institutions, established that as the intensity of AML therapy has increased, so has the rate of AHS. Young children, those with previous AHS bacteremias, and those receiving high-dose cytarabine are at particularly high risk of AHS bacteremia.

Optimization of Chemotherapy for Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of the Medical Research Council AML15 Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (27) ◽  
pp. 3360-3368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan K. Burnett ◽  
Nigel H. Russell ◽  
Robert K. Hills ◽  
Ann E. Hunter ◽  
Lars Kjeldsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose Treatment outcomes in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved, but optimization and new combinations are needed. We assess three combinations in induction and consolidation. Patients and Methods Younger untreated patients with AML (median age, 49 years; range, 0 to 73 years) were randomly allocated to two induction courses of daunorubicin and cytarabine (DA) with or without etoposide (ADE; n = 1983) or ADE versus fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida; n = 1268), and to amsacrine, cytarabine, etoposide, and then mitoxantrone/cytarabine (MACE-MidAC) or high-dose cytarabine (n = 1,445) 3 g/m2 or 1.5 g/m2 (n = 657) in consolidation, and finally to a fifth course (cytarabine) or not (n = 227). Results Overall remission rates were similar for DA versus ADE (84% v 86%; P = .14) and ADE versus FLAG-Ida (86% v 85%; P = .7), with more course 1 remissions after FLAG-Ida (77%) reducing relapse (38% v 55%; P < .001) and improving relapse-free survival (45% v 34%; P = .01), overall and in subgroups, but with increased myelosuppression, reducing participation in the consolidation randomization. Overall outcomes were similar between MACE/MidAc and high-dose cytarabine (1.5/3.0 g/m2), but cytarabine required less supportive care. MACE/MidAc was superior for high-risk patients. A fifth course provided no benefit. The outcome for recipients of only two FLAG-Ida courses were not different from that with DA/ADE with consolidation. Conclusion FLAG-Ida is an effective remission induction treatment, with a high complete remission rate after course 1 and reduced relapse. Consolidation with MACE/MidAc is similar overall to high-dose cytarabine, but superior in high-risk patients. Cytarabine at 1.5 g/m2 is equivalent to a 3 g/m2 dose. A fifth course is unnecessary. In patients receiving FLAG-Ida (two courses) and cytarabine (two courses), 8-year survival was 63% for patients with intermediate-risk and 95% for those with favorable-risk disease.

scholarly journals Clofarabine Can Replace Anthracyclines and Etoposide in Remission Induction Therapy for Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The AML08 Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (23) ◽  
pp. 2072-2081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E. Rubnitz ◽  
Norman J. Lacayo ◽  
Hiroto Inaba ◽  
Kenneth Heym ◽  
Raul C. Ribeiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Myeloid

PURPOSE To identify effective and less toxic therapy for children with acute myeloid leukemia, we introduced clofarabine into the first course of remission induction to reduce exposure to daunorubicin and etoposide. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 2008 through 2017, 285 patients were enrolled at eight centers; 262 were randomly assigned to receive clofarabine and cytarabine (Clo+AraC, n = 129) or high-dose cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide (HD-ADE, n = 133) as induction I. Induction II consisted of low-dose ADE given alone or combined with sorafenib or vorinostat. Consolidation therapy comprised two or three additional courses of chemotherapy or hematopoietic cell transplantation. Genetic abnormalities and the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) at day 22 of initial remission induction determined final risk classification. The primary end point was MRD at day 22. RESULTS Complete remission was induced after two courses of therapy in 263 (92.3%) of the 285 patients; induction failures included four early deaths and 15 cases of resistant leukemia. Day 22 MRD was positive in 57 of 121 randomly assigned evaluable patients (47%) who received Clo+AraC and 42 of 121 patients (35%) who received HD-ADE (odds ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.41; P = .04). Despite this result, the 3-year event-free survival rate (52.9% [44.6% to 62.8%] for Clo+AraC v 52.4% [44.0% to 62.4%] for HD-ADE, P = .94) and overall survival rate (74.8% [67.1% to 83.3%] for Clo+AraC v 64.6% [56.2% to 74.2%] for HD-ADE, P = .1) did not differ significantly across the two arms. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that the use of clofarabine with cytarabine during remission induction might reduce the need for anthracycline and etoposide in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia and may reduce rates of cardiomyopathy and treatment-related cancer.

Treatment of newly diagnosed children and adolescents with acute myeloid leukemia: a Childrens Cancer Group study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 2367-2377 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Wells ◽  
W G Woods ◽  
J D Buckley ◽  
L F Odom ◽  
D Benjamin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Drug Regimen ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Acute Myeloid

PURPOSE The objectives of this study were to determine if the addition of etoposide, thioguanine, and dexamethasone to daunorubicin and cytarabine (five-drug regimen) during induction would improve remission induction rates and survival of children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) when compared with the standard regimen of cytarabine and daunorubicin (7 + 3) and whether allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or intensive chemotherapy consolidation with or without maintenance would give a superior outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 591 assessable children with AML entered Childrens Cancer Group (CCG) trial 213 between January 1986 and February 1989. The status of patients as of September 1, 1992 forms the basis of this report. The results were compared with previous AML studies. RESULTS The projected survival rate of all patients at 5 years is 39% (event-free survival [EFS] rate, 31%), which is superior to that of the prior CCG study (P = .01). The induction rate was 79% for 7 + 3 and 76% for the five-drug regimen (not significant). Comparisons of BMT to chemotherapy favored BMT, but these differences do not always reach statistical significance (eg, 5-year disease-free survival [DFS] rate, 46% v 38% [P = .06] with donor available and 54% v 37% [P = .002] if treated according to protocol intent). No benefit for maintenance therapy was found and, in some comparisons, it was inferior to discontinuation of therapy (5-year survival rate, 46% v 68%, P < .01). CONCLUSION The 5-year EFS rate of patients with AML is 31% and has improved. The five-drug induction regimen is no better than standard induction, BMT appears superior to chemotherapy, and maintenance therapy was not beneficial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document