scholarly journals Impact of Consensus Molecular Subtype on Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance)

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (22) ◽  
pp. 1876-1885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Alan P. Venook ◽  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
Donna Niedzwiecki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Consensus Molecular Subtype ◽  
Predictive And Prognostic Value

PURPOSE To determine the predictive and prognostic value of the consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) that represent a merging of gene expression–based features largely in primary tumors from six independent classification systems and provide a framework for capturing the intrinsic heterogeneity of CRC in patients enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405. PATIENTS AND METHODS CALGB/SWOG 80405 is a phase III trial that compared the addition of bevacizumab or cetuximab to infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan as first-line treatment of advanced CRC. We characterized the CMS classification using a novel NanoString gene expression panel on primary CRCs from 581 patients enrolled in this study to assess the prognostic and predictive value of CMSs in these patients. RESULTS The CMSs are highly prognostic for overall survival (OS; P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; P < .001). Furthermore, CMSs were predictive for both OS ( P for interaction < .001) and PFS ( P for interaction = .0032). In the CMS1 cohort, patients treated with bevacizumab had a significantly longer OS than those treated with cetuximab ( P < .001). In the CMS2 cohort, patients treated with cetuximab had a significantly longer OS than patients treated with bevacizumab ( P = .0046). CONCLUSION These findings highlight the possible clinical utility of CMSs and suggests that refinement of the CMS classification may provide a path toward identifying patients with metastatic CRC who are most likely to benefit from specific targeted therapy as part of the initial treatment.

Phase III Trial of Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) Compared With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) As First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 1670-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Falcone ◽  
Sergio Ricci ◽  
Isa Brunetti ◽  
Elisabetta Pfanner ◽  
Giacomo Allegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Peripheral Neurotoxicity ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Resection ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) conducted a phase III study comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI [irinotecan 165 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 day 1, fluorouracil 3,200 mg/m2 48-hour continuous infusion starting on day 1, every 2 weeks]) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Methods Selection criteria included unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary end point was response rate (RR). Results A total of 244 patients were randomly assigned. An increase of grade 2 to 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (0% v 19%; P < .001), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (28% v 50%; P < .001) were observed in the FOLFOXIRI arm. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% v 5%) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (12% v 20%) were not significantly different. Responses, as assessed by investigators, were, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively, complete, 6% and 8%; and partial, 35% and 58%, (RR, 41% v 66%; P = .0002). RR confirmed by an external panel was 34% versus 60% (P < .0001). The R0 secondary resection rate of metastases was greater in the FOLFOXIRI arm (6% v 15%; P = .033, among all 244 patients; and 12% v 36%; P = .017 among patients with liver metastases only). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were both significantly improved in the FOLFOXIRI arm (median PFS, 6.9 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .0006; median OS, 16.7 v 22.6 months; HR, 0.70; P = .032). Conclusion The FOLFOXIRI regimen improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with FOLFIRI, with an increased, but manageable, toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with favorable prognostic characteristics. Further studies of FOLFOXIRI in combination with targeted agents and in the neoadjuvant setting are warranted.

Impact of primary tumor sidedness on erlotinib efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab maintenance: Results from the DREAM phase III trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 737-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoist Chibaudel ◽  
Thierry Andre ◽  
Benoit Samson ◽  
Marie-Line Garcia-Larnicol ◽  
Jérôme Dauba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Mutational Status

737 Background: Primary tumor sidedness (PTS) could be a predictive maker for treatment efficacy of EGFR inhibitors monoclonal antibodies in patients with wild-type (WT) RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC), cetuximab having limited efficacy in patients with WT-RAS right-sided tumors. DREAM study demonstrated that adding erlotinib, an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to bevacizumab during maintenance therapy improved clinical outcomes (RR, PFS, OS) in patients with MCRC, whatever KRAS status. The aim of this post-hoc analysis is to evaluate the clinical outcomes according to KRAS mutational status and PTS when adding erlotinib to bevacizumab maintenance therapy. Methods: PTS was retrospectively collected in patients from the DREAM phase III trial treated with bevacizumab with or without erlotinib as maintenance therapy for MCRC who have been controlled by induction therapy. The limit for the definition of PTS was splenic flexure, and rectal tumors were considered as left-sided tumors. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: Among 452 patients who received maintenance therapy, PTS ascertainment was 84.7% (n = 383) with 265 (71.0%) patients having left-sided primary tumor and 108 (28.9%) having right-sided primary tumors (3 patients had both and tumor location was unknown in 7 patients). Median OS and treatment effect are presented in table 1. Conclusions: The greatest OS benefit of adding erlotinib to bevacizumab maintenance therapy was observed in patients with WT-KRAS and right-sided MCRC, suggesting a clinical impact of the different mechanism of action between EGFR TKI and monoclonal antibodies. Clinical trial information: NCT00265824. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Aflibercept in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. CMO.S7432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzu-Fei Wang ◽  
Albert Craig Lockhart
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Third ◽  
Common Cancer ◽  
The Us

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the US. In recent decades, an improved understanding of the role of the angiogenesis pathway in colorectal cancer has led to advancements in treatment. Bevacizumab has been shown to improve the progression-free survival and overall survival when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and at present is the only antiangiogenesis agent approved for the treatment of this cancer. Aflibercept is a novel angiogenesis-targeting agent, and has demonstrated efficacy in treating metastatic colorectal cancer in a recent randomized Phase III trial. Here we review the role of angiogenesis in the tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer, strategies for targeting angiogenesis, and the clinical development of aflibercept.

A randomized phase III trial of S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab versus 5-FU/l-LV/oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus bevacizmab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: The SOFT study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3519-3519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
Yasuhide Yamada ◽  
Hiroshi Matsumoto ◽  
Hideo Baba ◽  
Kazuhiro Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

3519 Background: Several studies of oxaliplatin plus S-1 combination therapy (SOX) conducted in Asia have shown promising efficacy and safety for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), suggesting the potential to replace mFOLFOX6. We performed a randomized phase III trial to determine whether SOX plus bevacizmab (SOX+Bev) is non-inferior to mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizmab (mFOLFOX6+Bev) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: The SOFT study was a randomized, open-label, phase III trial. Chemotherapy-naïve patients (pts) with mCRC, an ECOG PS of 0-1, and adequate organ functions were randomized to receive either mFOLFOX6+Bev (5 mg/kg of bevacizumab, followed by 200 mg/m2 of l-leucovorin given simultaneously with 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin, followed by a 400 mg/m2 bolus of 5-FU on day 1 and then 2,400 mg/m2 of 5-FU over 46 h, every 2 weeks) or SOX+Bev (7.5 mg/kg of bevacizumab, 130 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1, and 40−60 mg of S-1 twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest). The primary endpoint was PFS. A sample size of 225 pts per group was estimated to be necessary based on a median PFS of 10.0 months in each group and an 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority of SOX+Bev with a 2.5-month margin (hazard ratio, HR = 1.33) and a 2-sided alpha of 0.05. Results: A total of 512 pts were enrolled from February 2009 to March 2011. Data were analyzed after confirming >388 events as planned. Demographic factors were well balanced. Pts received a median of 12 cycles (1 cycle = 2 weeks) of mFOLFOX6+Bev and 8 cycles (1 cycle = 3 weeks) of SOX+Bev (range: 1−16). Median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI: 10.7−13.2) with mFOLFOX6+Bev and 11.7 months (95% CI: 10.7−12.9) with SOX+Bev. The adjusted HR for PFS was 1.043 (95% CI: 0.860−1.266), and the p value for non-inferiority was 0.0139. Response rate was 62.7% with mFOLFOX6+Bev and 61.5% with SOX+Bev. Grade 3/4 toxicities (%) with mFOLFOX6+Bev/SOX+Bev were leukopenia 8.4/2.4, neutropenia 33.7/8.8, anorexia 1.2/5.2, and diarrhea 2.8/9.2. Conclusions: SOX+Bev is non-inferior to mFOLFOX6+Bev with respect to PFS as 1st-line treatment for mCRC and thus can replace mFOLFOX6+Bev. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-090699.

Predictive and prognostic value of HER2 gene expression and HER2 amplification in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4086-4086
Author(s):  
Francesca Battaglin ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Xueping Qu ◽  
Monica M. Bertagnolli ◽  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Her2 Amplification ◽  
Her2 Gene ◽  
Molecular Features ◽  
Predictive And Prognostic Value

4086 Background: The randomized phase III CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial found no difference in overall survival (OS) in first-line mCRC pts treated with either bevacizumab (Bev) or cetuximab (Cet) combined with the same chemotherapy. We investigated the potential prognostic and predictive value of HER2 amplification and HER2 gene expression using NGS and Nanostring data. Methods: Primary tumor DNA from 559 patients (pts) was profiled for HER2 amplification by NGS (Foundation One). Tumor tissue from 925 pts was tested for Nanostring gene expression using an 800 gene panel. OS and progression free survival (PFS) were the endpoints as time-to-event variables. Cox proportional hazard models with gene expression fitted with linear spline (one internal knot at median) were used, adjusting for pts baseline characteristics, treatment assignment, and molecular features (microsatellite instability, BRAF, all RAS). Results: Of 505 tumors with both NGS and Nanostring data, 16 harbored HER2 amplification (copy number variation > 6), limited to microsatellite stable tumors and significantly associated with HER2 expression ( P < 0.001) and wild-type RAS ( P = 0.036). HER2 amplification was neither prognostic nor predictive for OS or PFS. Conversely, HER2 expression higher than median was associated with longer PFS ( P = 0.018) but not OS ( P = 0.13). Among pts with HER2 not amplified, higher HER2 expression was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95%CI, 0.72-0.97; P = 0.016) and PFS (HR, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.74-0.98; P = 0.027) when the expression was less than median. Additionally, in pts with no HER2 amplification and HER2 expression lower than median, treatment with Cet was associated with worse PFS compared to Bev (HR, 1.46; 95%CI, 1.12-1.90; P = 0.005). This effect was not observed with expression higher than median regardless of HER2 amplification status. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest analysis of HER2 amplification and gene expression in mCRC pts treated with standard therapy. Our results provide novel insight on the predictive and prognostic value of HER2 gene expression in pts treated with Cet- and Bev-based regimens. Upon validation, these findings could inform pts selection and the design of more effective treatment options for pts with low HER2 expression. Clinical trial information: NCT00265850.

Consensus molecular subtype (CMS) as a novel integral biomarker in colorectal cancer: A phase II trial of bintrafusp alfa in CMS4 metastatic CRC.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4084-4084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Mehrvarz Sarshekeh ◽  
Michael Lam ◽  
Isabel R. Zorrilla ◽  
Emma Brey Holliday ◽  
Prajnan Das ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Consensus Molecular Subtype

4084 Background: Consensus Molecular Subtype 4 (CMS4) colorectal cancer (CRC) features increased TGFβ signaling, which may account for de novo resistance to immunotherapy for patients (pts) with microsatellite stable mCRC. To date, no prior trial has incorporated CMS status as an integral biomarker. Bintrafusp alfa (M7824) is a dual PD-L1 antibody/TGFβ trap with acceptable safety. Methods: Primary tumors from pts with metastatic CRC underwent CMS testing in a CLIA setting. In this Simon two-stage phase II trial (Ho: p < .05; Ha: p≥.25) for CMS4 mCRC, pts received bintrafusp alfa 1200mg IV every 14 days. RT (8Gy/day x 3 days) to a single metastatic lesion with abscopal intent was administered between doses 2 and 3. The primary objective was to estimate response rate (RR) per iRECIST. Correlative studies including RNA sequencing were performed on pre- and on-treatment biopsies. Results: 53 of 137 tested pts (39%) between June 2018-December 2019 had CMS4 mCRC. 13 of 15 treated pts received the agent with RT. All pts were evaluable for toxicity, and 13 for response. Median number of doses was 3 (IQR, 2-4). There was one grade 3 immune-related adverse event (colitis) requiring study discontinuation. There were 2 pts with stable disease and 11 with progressive disease as best response (RR 0%, 95% CI 0-22%). Enrollment was stopped after first stage for futility. Median PFS and OS were 1.6 months and 5.0 months, respectively. In paired samples, treatment with bintrafusp alfa resulted in an increase in the expression of IFNγ signature in nonirradiated metastatic lesions ( p< .001, q< .001). Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: This is the first reported clinical trial to utilize CMS status as an integral biomarker for pts with metastatic CRC and capitalizes on treating CRC subpopulations with targeted agents based upon validated RNA-based signatures. Although the efficacy for bintrafusp alfa and RT is low, changes in IFNγ signature provides a potential signal for refining therapeutic strategies based upon TGFβ enrichment in pts with mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03436563 .

Randomized, Phase III Trial of Panitumumab With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) Versus FOLFOX4 Alone As First-Line Treatment in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The PRIME Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (31) ◽  
pp. 4697-4705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Yves Douillard ◽  
Salvatore Siena ◽  
James Cassidy ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Ronald Burkes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
End Point

Purpose Panitumumab, a fully human anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody that improves progression-free survival (PFS), is approved as monotherapy for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The Panitumumab Randomized Trial in Combination With Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to Determine Efficacy (PRIME) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as initial treatment for mCRC. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, phase III trial, patients with no prior chemotherapy for mCRC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, and available tissue for biomarker testing were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. The primary end point was PFS; overall survival (OS) was a secondary end point. Results were prospectively analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis by tumor KRAS status. Results KRAS results were available for 93% of the 1,183 patients randomly assigned. In the wild-type (WT) KRAS stratum, panitumumab-FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS compared with FOLFOX4 (median PFS, 9.6 v 8.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.97; P = .02). A nonsignificant increase in OS was also observed for panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 (median OS, 23.9 v 19.7 months, respectively; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.02; P = .072). In the mutant KRAS stratum, PFS was significantly reduced in the panitumumab-FOLFOX4 arm versus the FOLFOX4 arm (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.62; P = .02), and median OS was 15.5 months versus 19.3 months, respectively (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.57; P = .068). Adverse event rates were generally comparable across arms with the exception of toxicities known to be associated with anti-EGFR therapy. Conclusion This study demonstrated that panitumumab-FOLFOX4 was well tolerated and significantly improved PFS in patients with WT KRAS tumors and underscores the importance of KRAS testing for patients with mCRC.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110091
Author(s):  
Keigo Chida ◽  
Daisuke Kotani ◽  
Yoshiaki Nakamura ◽  
Akihito Kawazoe ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

Background: The C-TASK-FORCE phase I/II and Danish randomized phase II trials reported the promising efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS102) plus bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there had been no direct comparative phase III trial to compare the efficacy between TAS102 plus BEV and standard therapy with either TAS102 or regorafenib monotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with mCRC who received TAS102 plus BEV, TAS102 monotherapy, or regorafenib monotherapy after standard chemotherapies during 2013–2019. Results: Patients received TAS102 plus BEV ( n = 139), TAS102 monotherapy ( n = 153), or regorafenib monotherapy ( n = 133). With a median follow-up of 25.3 months, median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.9–13.9] for TAS102 plus BEV, 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.8–9.2) for TAS102 monotherapy, and 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.7–8.5) for regorafenib monotherapy. The hazard ratios were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.51–0.88) for TAS102 plus BEV versus TAS102 monotherapy and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54–0.94) for TAS102 plus BEV versus regorafenib monotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.4) for TAS102 plus BEV, 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.6–2.3) for TAS102 monotherapy, and 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.6–2.3) for regorafenib monotherapy. The hazard ratios were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45–0.73) for TAS102 plus BEV versus TAS102 monotherapy and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.34–0.58) for TAS102 plus BEV versus regorafenib monotherapy. On multivariate analysis, TAS102 plus BEV was independently correlated with better OS and PFS. No unexpected adverse events were observed in any group. Conclusion: Our study shows that OS and PFS are longer in patients treated with TAS102 plus BEV than in those treated with TAS102 or regorafenib monotherapy.

scholarly journals Randomized Trial of Irinotecan and Cetuximab With or Without Vemurafenib in BRAF-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (SWOG S1406)

2020 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.01994
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Katherine A. Guthrie ◽  
Van K. Morris ◽  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Anthony M. Magliocco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Rna Profiling ◽  
Low Incidence ◽  
Consensus Molecular Subtype

PURPOSE BRAF V600E mutations are rarely associated with objective responses to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Blockade of BRAF V600E by vemurafenib causes feedback upregulation of EGFR, whose signaling activities can be impeded by cetuximab. METHODS One hundred six patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic CRC previously treated with one or two regimens were randomly assigned to irinotecan and cetuximab with or without vemurafenib (960 mg PO twice daily). RESULTS Progression-free survival, the primary end point, was improved with the addition of vemurafenib (hazard ratio, 0.50, P = .001). The response rate was 17% versus 4% ( P = .05), with a disease control rate of 65% versus 21% ( P < .001). A decline in circulating tumor DNA BRAF V600E variant allele frequency was seen in 87% versus 0% of patients ( P < .001), with a low incidence of acquired RAS alterations at the time of progression. RNA profiling suggested that treatment benefit did not depend on previously established BRAF subgroups or the consensus molecular subtype. CONCLUSION Simultaneous inhibition of EGFR and BRAF combined with irinotecan is effective in BRAF V600E-mutated CRC.

Relevance of serum HER2 extracellular domain (sECD) in EGF30008, a study of letrozole ± lapatinib in patients (pts) with hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1019-1019
Author(s):  
G. T. Platek ◽  
M. Koehler ◽  
R. Gagnon ◽  
L. O'Rourke ◽  
J. D. Maltzman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Predictive And Prognostic Value

1019 Background: Elevated baseline sECD (BsECD) correlates weakly with HER2 overexpression (HER2+). HR+ MBC. Lapatinib benefit was reported in pts with HER2+ tumors irrespective of BsECD status; BsECD status did not predict benefit for HER2- negative (HER2-ve) tumors. sECD levels and their predictive and prognostic value for progression-free survival (PFS) were further examined in a randomized, phase III trial of letrozole ± lapatinib. Methods: Pts (n=1286) with HR+ MBC were randomized to letrozole with placebo (P) or lapatinib (L). HER2 status was evaluated by FISH or IHC in archived tissue. sECD was measured by ELISA at baseline (n=1102 available samples), and every 4 wk. Pts were considered sECD+ if serum sECD was >15 ng/ml. Results: BsECD was positive in 14% (125/894) and 42% (87/208) of pts with HER2-ve and HER2+ tumors, respectively. Correlation between BsECD and FISH was weak but significant in HER2+ pts (R=0.35, p<0.0001) but not in HER2-ve pts (R=0.03, p=0.362). Unlike for HER2+ tumors, BsECD+ did not predict benefit in PFS from L in pts with HER2-ve tumors. HR: Hazard Ratio In pts with HER2- ve tumors, median ECD levels were stable in the P arm but increased slightly (4 ng/mL) in the L arm. In the HER2+ group, median levels in the P arm declined (3.5 ng/mL) but increased at 4 wk in L arm (3.4 ng/mL) and were stable thereafter. Conversion from sECD-ve to sECD+ was observed in both arms but did not correlate with outcome or provide predictive value. Data related to ECD status conversion will be reported. Conclusions: BsECD+ status correlates with HER2+ tumor status and may predict L benefit but BsECD+ status did not predict benefit in pts with HER2-ve tumors. On therapy changes in median sECD were small. Conversion from BsECD-ve to sECD+ did not predict L benefit and we could not confirm that evaluation of on treatment ECD status may help treatment decision. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document