scholarly journals Patient-Level Factors Associated With Lack of Health Care Provider Recommendation for the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Among Young Cancer Survivors

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (25) ◽  
pp. 2892-2901
Author(s):  
Jocelyn M. York ◽  
James L. Klosky ◽  
Yanjun Chen ◽  
James A. Connelly ◽  
Karen Wasilewski-Masker ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Young cancer survivors are at increased risk for morbidities related to infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV), yet their HPV vaccine initiation rates remain low. Patient-/parent-reported lack of health care provider recommendation for HPV vaccination is strongly associated with vaccine noninitiation. We aimed to identify patient-level factors associated with survivor-/parent-reported lack of provider recommendation for HPV vaccination among young cancer survivors. METHODS Cancer survivors ages 9-26 years and 1-5 years off therapy completed a cross-sectional survey (parent-completed for survivors 9-17 years of age). Lack of health care provider HPV vaccine recommendation was the outcome of interest in a multivariable logistic regression model that included relevant patient-level sociodemographic, clinical, and vaccine-related variables. RESULTS Of 955 survivors, 54% were male, 66% were non-Hispanic White, and 36% had leukemia. At survey participation, survivors were an average age (± standard deviation) of 16.3 ± 4.7 years and 32.8 ± 14.7 months off therapy. Lack of provider HPV vaccine recommendation was reported by 73% (95% CI, 70% to 75%) of survivors. For the entire cohort, patient-level factors associated with lack of reported provider recommendation included perceived lack of insurance coverage for the HPV vaccine (odds ratio [OR], 4.0; 95% CI, 2.7 to 5.9; P < .001), male sex (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9 to 4.0; P < .001), and decreased parent-survivor communication regarding HPV vaccination (OR, 1.7 per unit decrease in score; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.2; P < .001). In the sex- and age-stratified models, perceived lack of insurance coverage (all models) and male sex (age-stratified models) were also significantly associated with lack of reported provider recommendation. CONCLUSION We identified factors characterizing survivors at risk for not reporting receipt of a health care provider HPV vaccine recommendation. Future research is needed to develop interventions that facilitate effective provider recommendations for HPV vaccination among all young cancer survivors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 282-290
Author(s):  
Traber D. Giardina ◽  
Kathryn E. Royse ◽  
Arushi Khanna ◽  
Helen Haskell ◽  
Julia Hallisy ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 119 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S61-S67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beth Zeni ◽  
William Sappenfield ◽  
Dan Thompson ◽  
Hailin Chen

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205031211985426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Chalian ◽  
Pegah Khoshpouri ◽  
Arya M Iranmanesh ◽  
Joseph G Mammarappallil ◽  
Shervin Assari

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to estimate the percentage of individuals possibly eligible for lung cancer screening that report having discussed screening with a health care provider. The secondary objective was to investigate the associated factors of having patient–provider lung cancer screening discussion. Methods: Data from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2017 were used ( n = 3217). Lung cancer screening eligibility was based on the criteria utilized by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Gender, race, educational attainment, health insurance coverage, and usual source of health care were covariates. Current or former smokers ages 55–77 ( n = 706) were considered potentially eligible for lung cancer screening (dependent variable). Results: Only 12.24% of individuals potentially eligible for lung cancer screening report prior discussion regarding lung cancer screening with a health care provider. Being eligible for lung cancer screening based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services eligibility criteria was positively associated with the odds of a patient–provider lung cancer screening discussion (odds ratio = 3.95, 95% confidence interval = 2.48–6.30). Unlike gender, race, education, or insurance coverage, a usual source of health care was positively associated with a patient–provider screening discussion (odds ratio = 2.48, 95% confidence interval = 1.31–4.70). Conclusion: Individuals potentially eligible for lung cancer screening are more likely to have screening discussions with a health care provider. Having a usual source of health care may increase the odds of such a discussion, while patients are not discriminated based on race, gender, education, and insurance coverage. However, the relatively low rate (12.24%) of reported patient–provider lung cancer screening discussion indicates that significant barriers still remain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document