Breast cancers negative for estrogen receptor but positive for progesterone receptor, a true entity?

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 662-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
D T Kiang ◽  
R Kollander

By the conventional steroid-binding assay method for receptor, 3% of 1,095 primary breast cancers (or 10.6% of 263 premenopausal tumors) were classified as negative for estrogen receptor (ER), but positive for progesterone receptor (PR). The true ER status in this rare group of tumors was further investigated by the enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) or immunocytochemical (ICA) staining method using monoclonal antibodies H222 and D547. Immunoreactive ER was present in nine ER-/PR+ tumors studied, whereas it was not detectable in nine age-matched ER-/PR- tumors. Immunoreactive ER was also present in 24 ER+ breast cancers studied, and was particularly higher in tumors that were PR+. Measurement of immunoreactive ER by monoclonal antibody method provides certain advantages over the conventional dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) method, especially in ER-/PR+ tumors.

1988 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1987-1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
J T Wu ◽  
L W Wilson

Abstract We evaluated and compared Abbott Laboratories' newly developed enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for measuring progesterone receptors (PgR) with that of DuPont's steroid-binding assay (SBA). We also used both methods to study the stability of PgR under various conditions. THere were excellent correlations for all 59 cytosols compared (r = 0.94) and for the 44 cytosols containing PgR greater than 10 fmol per milligram of protein (r = 0.93), but the correlation for cytosols containing less than 10 fmol of PgR per milligram was poor. We found PgR to be more stable as assayed by EIA than by SBA. The biological half-lives of PgR at 30, 4, and -60 degrees C were approximately 3 h, 6 days, and 19 days, respectively. The effect of molybdate on PgR is complex. Its presence during tissue homogenization leads to analytical recovery of more PgR and may stabilize PgR during storage. Its presence during enzyme immunoassay is less critical. Unlike estrogen receptor, PgR is not protected by its ligand, R5020.


1988 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Riccobon ◽  
Wainer Zoli ◽  
Antonella Capucci ◽  
Annalisa Volpi ◽  
Mara Vasini ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results obtained from a new enzyme immunoassay (Abbott-ER-EIA) for the determination of estrogen receptor levels in tumor cytosols in comparison with the currently used DCC method. One hundred and fifteen consecutive primary breast cancer specimens were examined; 66 of the women were postmenopausal and 49 were premenopausal. A good correlation (r = 0.88, p < 0.001 and a slope of 1.3) was found between ER-EIA and the steroid binding assay (DCC). When these data were analyzed according to menopausal status, no differences were observed for the slopes and correlation coefficients in pre’ and postmenopausal groups. The ER-EIA appears to produce results comparable to those obtained with the conventional DCC method for the determination of ER in breast tumor cytosols.


1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1474-1474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennet M. Harvey ◽  
Gary M. Clark ◽  
C. Kent Osborne ◽  
D. Craig Allred

PURPOSE: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a newer technique for assessing the estrogen receptor (ER) status of breast cancers, with the potential to overcome many of the shortcomings associated with the traditional ligand-binding assay (LBA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of ER status determination by IHC, compared with LBA, to predict clinical outcome—especially response to adjuvant endocrine therapy—in a large number of patients with long-term clinical follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ER status was evaluated in 1,982 primary breast cancers by IHC on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections, using antibody 6F11 and standard methodology. Slides were scored on a scale representing the estimated proportion and intensity of positive-staining tumor cells (range, 0 to 8). Results were compared with ER values obtained by the LBA in the same tumors and to clinical outcome. RESULTS: An IHC score of greater than 2 (corresponding to as few as 1% to 10% weakly positive cells) was used to define ER positivity on the basis of a univariate cut-point analysis of all possible scores and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients receiving any adjuvant endocrine therapy. Using this definition, 71% of all tumors were determined to be ER-positive by IHC, and the level of agreement with the LBA was 86%. In multivariate analyses of patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy alone, ER status determined by IHC was better than that determined by the LBA at predicting improved DFS (hazard ratios/P = 0.474/.0008 and 0.707/.3214, respectively) and equivalent at predicting overall survival (0.379/.0001 and 0.381/.0003, respectively). CONCLUSION: IHC is superior to the LBA for assessing ER status in primary breast cancer because it is easier, safer, and less expensive, and has an equivalent or better ability to predict response to adjuvant endocrine therapy.


Cancer ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 72 (7) ◽  
pp. 2291-2292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent F. Guinee ◽  
Kenneth R. Hess ◽  
Richard M. Elledge ◽  
Gregory Langone ◽  
Daniel R. Ciocca

2003 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Muir ◽  
R. Kanthan ◽  
S. C. Kanthan

Abstract Context.—The rate of male breast cancer is a small fraction of that observed in females, thus severely limiting our understanding of the pathogenesis of this condition. It remains unclear whether the biological behavior and tumor progression associated with male breast cancer parallel that of the female form. Objectives.—To evaluate the immunohistochemical profile of male breast carcinomas and to compare this profile with that of stage-matched female breast cancers. Design.—Seventy-five cases of primary male breast cancer were identified using the records of the Saskatchewan Cancer Foundation over a period of 26 years (1970–1996). Fifty-nine of these cases had formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks available for the purposes of this study. All cases were reviewed and a standardized modified Bloom-Richardson grading criterion was applied. Estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, c-Erb-B2 expression, p53 expression, and Bcl-2 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Results from 240 consecutive cases of stage-matched female breast cancers analyzed in the same laboratory were used as a standard set for comparison. Results.—Male breast cancers tended to be high grade (85% grade 3) in comparison with the female breast cancers (50% grade 3). In descriptive analysis across all stages of disease, male carcinomas were more frequently estrogen receptor positive (81% vs 69%) than their female counterparts. Despite their high grade, they were less likely to overexpress p53 (9% vs 28%) and Erb-B2 (5% vs 17%) than the female counterparts. There was no significant difference in either progesterone receptor (63% vs 56%) or Bcl-2 (79% vs 76%) overexpression. Stratified analysis by stage-matched controls showed no statistically significant differences among the men and women with stage I disease. However, in stage II–matched samples, statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups. The male cancers were more likely to overexpress estrogen receptor (81.6% vs 64.4%, P = .04), progesterone receptor (71.1% vs 47.5%, P = .01), and Bcl-2 (78.9% vs 69.4%, P = .20). They also showed statistically significant lower expression of p53 (7.9% vs 36.3%, P = .001) and Erb-B2 (5.3% vs 23.8% P = .01). Conclusion.—Male breast cancers display distinct immunophenotypic differences from those occurring in women, implying a different pathogenesis in the evolution and progression of this disease. Such differences may play key roles in therapeutic management, warranting different treatment strategies in comparison to female breast cancers.


1983 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 349-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Fisher ◽  
D L Wickerham ◽  
A Brown ◽  
C K Redmond

Increasing evidence indicates the importance of ascertaining the quantitative estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) content (in femtomoles per milligram cytosol protein) of primary breast cancers. Those values obtained from the tumors of 1,887 patients participating in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-09 have been analyzed to define (1) the distribution of tumor ER or PR according to patient age, (2) the distribution of tumor PR within a specific ER interval, and (3) the concordance of tumor ER and PR levels. The present findings indicate how predictive the knowledge of the amount of one receptor (e.g., ER) may be for estimating the amount of the other (PR), when the latter is unknown.


1989 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-102
Author(s):  
R.M. Tomasino ◽  
E. Daniele ◽  
R. Nuara ◽  
V. Morello ◽  
M. Salvato ◽  
...  

A series of 65 cases of different histological types of breast carcinoma was investigated for the immunohistochemical location of the estrogen receptor-related, 29 kD phosphoprotein using the ER-D5 monoclonal antibody. The ER-D5 response is heterogeneous in relation to some therapeutic limitations and is correlated with histopathological features of the tumors and survival. The main parameters for evaluation of breast cancers are reviewed, both those that are statistically correlated and those that are not apparently always correlated but are known to have considerable biological meaning, such as the ER-status of tumors.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22223-e22223
Author(s):  
N. A. Zarubina ◽  
V. D. Petrova ◽  
T. V. Sinkina ◽  
S. A. Terekhova ◽  
A. F. Lazarev ◽  
...  

e22223 Background: Hereditary breast carcinomas that are attributable to BRCA1 mutations have their own morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics. This study was aimed to analyze the level of expression of steroids (estrogen and progesterone) and HER2-neu receptors in BRCA1 associated breast cancer. Methods: DNA patterns from 264 patients with hereditary breast cancers (breast cancer diagnosed at the age under 40; bilateral breast cancer; combination of breast and ovarian cancers; 2 and more breast cancers in blood relatives). All the patients were residents of the Altai Territory. BRCA1 gene mutations were registered in 34 patients (12.9%): 5382insC gene mutation - in 28 patients; 300A/C - in 2 patients; 4153del - in 3 patients; 185del - in 1 patient. The frequency of the BRCA1 5382insC allele mutation was 7.3; 300A/C - 0.52; 4153del - 0.26; 185del - 0.83. Immunohistochemical characteristics of BRCA1-associated breast tumors tissue from these patients were investigated. Results: 32 BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas were estrogen receptor- negative; 1 - week positive (H-score 50–100); 1 - moderate positive (H- score 100–200). 33 BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas were progesterone receptor- negative; 1 - positive (H-score 200 and more). HER2-negative were 31 BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas; 2 were week positive (HER2-neu +); 1 - was moderate positive (HER2-neu ++). Conclusion: BRCA1-associated beast carcinomas have been found to be more frequently estrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor-, and HER2- negative. These data show that hereditary breast cancer associated with BRCA1 gene mutations poses poor prognosis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document