Phase II trial of carboplatin in the management of malignant mesothelioma.

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Raghavan ◽  
P Gianoutsos ◽  
J Bishop ◽  
J Lee ◽  
I Young ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Malignant Mesothelioma ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Health Organization

Thirty-one patients with advanced malignant mesothelioma, previously untreated or having received only one prior cytotoxic regimen, were treated in a prospective, single-arm phase II trial with carboplatin (NSC 241240) at a dose of 150 mg/m2 per day intravenously (IV) for 3 days (450 mg/m2/course). One complete remission and four partial remissions were achieved, yielding an overall objective response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4% to 34%). The median duration of remission was 8 months (range, 5 to 17). Nonhematological toxicity was mild (only 12% with World Health Organization [WHO] grade 3 vomiting); 16% suffered WHO grade 3 to 4 hematological toxicity, but there were no life-threatening episodes and no treatment-related deaths. Carboplatin has modest activity against malignant mesothelioma and, because of its low toxicity, has a role in the management of this disease.

Multicentric phase II trial of gemcitabine plus capecitabine combination in the treatment of previously anthracycline(An)-treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): SOLTI 0301 study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1051-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Ciruelos ◽  
J. Baselga ◽  
H. Cortes-Funes ◽  
A. Lluch ◽  
J. I. Mayordomo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group 1

1051 Background: Based on clinical activity of capecitabine(C) and gemcitabine (G) on the treatment of MBC, we performed a multicentric phase II trial of the combination to test its efficacy and safety profile. Methods: Sample size of 72 evaluable MBC patients (pts) previously An-treated (neoadjuvant 8%, adjuvant 69%, advanced 30%). Median age: 59 years (35–76 years). Estrogen Receptor positive: 47 (65%). HER2 overexpression: 16 (22%). Prior hormonal/trastuzumab allowed. Soft tissue/ganglionar/pleural/bone disease: 19 (26%); visceral metastasis: 53(74%). Stratification: previous chemotherapy (CT) for advanced disease (none: group 1; any: group 2). Study treatment: oral bid C 1,660 mg/m2/day (d) (d1–14) + iv G 1,000 mg/m2/d (d1&8). Cycles repeated every 3 weeks. RECIST/NCI-CTC 2.0 criteria. Primary end point: Objective Response Rate. Results: Response Rates and Clinical Benefit (CB) are detailed in the table . Median follow-up 7.2 months (m) (0.2–18.4). Median time to progression 11.2 m: group 1, 12 m (95%CI: 6.4–14.5); group 2, 8.9 m (95%CI: 6.9–14).Total and median administered cycles/pt: 479 and 8. Delayed cycles: 103(21.5%): 27% due to hematological toxicity, 11% due to non-hematological toxicity, 62% due to other causes. C dose reduced in 27 cycles (5.6%), 12 of them due to non- hematological toxicity. G dose reduced in 169 cycles (35%), mostly on day 8, and due to hematological toxicity (80% of reduced cycles). Grade 3–4 neutropenia: 32 pts (56%), 1 case of febrile neutropenia. Grade 3–4 non-hematological toxicities: asthenia 8 pts (14%), hand- foot syndrome 6 pts (10.5%), mucositis 3 pts (5%), diarrhea 2 pts (3.5%). Conclusions: Combination of C+G in the treatment of previously anthracycline-treated MBC is safe and active, with a manageable toxicity profile and a good clinical activity. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of fludarabine monophosphate in patients with mantle-cell lymphomas.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 579-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Decaudin ◽  
J Bosq ◽  
G Tertian ◽  
G Nedellec ◽  
A Bennaceur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
World Health ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Fludarabine Monophosphate ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE The aim of this phase II trial was to assess the efficacy of fludarabine monophosphate in untreated and pretreated mantle-cell lymphomas (MCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifteen patients with MCL were included in the study. In two cases, fludarabine was the first-line therapy, the second in four cases, the third in five cases, and the fourth in four cases. The diagnosis of MCL was based on the criteria of the European Lymphoma Task Force (ELTF), with morphologic, immunologic, and cytogenetic data. Patients were treated with intravenous fludarabine 25 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 4 weeks. RESULTS Toxicity of fludarabine was mild: World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 15 of 56 assessable cycles (cy) (27%), there was no grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, one grade 3 bacterial lung infection, and no treatment-related death. There were five partial responses (33%) but no complete response. The duration of these responses was short and ranged from 4 to 8 months. CONCLUSION These results suggest that fludarabine can be moderately effective in the treatment of MCL. Fludarabine appears to be far less effective than in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Therefore, fludarabine should be evaluated in association with other chemotherapeutic agents in MCL.

Final analysis of a multicenter, randomized phase II trial comparing three different chemoradiotherapy regimens in the treatment of patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4610-4610
Author(s):  
R. Wilkowski ◽  
S. Boeck ◽  
S. Ostermaier ◽  
R. Sauer ◽  
M. Herbst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Grade 3

4610 Background: To date, no standard treatment approach for patients (pts) with non-resectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) is defined. Methods: Within a prospective phase II trial treatment-naive pts with locally advanced PC and adequate organ function were randomly assigned to three different CRT regimens; all pts received a conventionally fractionated radiotherapy of 50 Gy (with a daily dose of 2.0 Gy) and were randomized to either concurrent 5-FU as a 24h-infusion (350 mg/m2/d on each day of radiotherapy, RT-5FU arm), concurrent low-dose gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 (RT-GC arm), or the same concurrent treatment followed by a sequential chemotherapy with full- dose gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and cisplatin (50 mg/m2) every two weeks (RT-GC+GC arm). Treatment duration in the RT- GC+GC arm was upon disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary study endpoint was the overall survival (OS) rate after 9 months (mo); secondary endpoints included response rate (WHO criteria), progression-free survival (PFS), resectability and toxicity. Results: Ninety-five patients (median age 64 years, 54% male, 50% KPS 90–100%) were recruited from 12 German centers. Seventy patients were evaluable for objective response: the intent-to-treat response rate (CR+PR) was 19% in the RT-5FU arm, 22% in the RT-GC arm and 13% in the RT-GC+GC arm, respectively. Overall, 18 pts (19%) underwent surgical resection after initial CRT (R0 in 8 pts). After a median follow-up of 8.6 mo, median PFS was estimated with 4 mo (RT-5FU), 5.6 mo (RT-GC) and 6 mo (RT- GC+GC), respectively (p=0.21). The corresponding median OS times were 9.6 mo, 9.3 mo and 7.3 mo (p=0.61). Hematological grade 3/4 toxicities were higher in the two gemcitabine/cisplatin-containing arms, but no grade 3/4 febrile neutopenia was observed. Regarding non-hematological toxicity, nausea/vomiting were more frequently in the RT-GC and RT-GC+GC arm, whereas diarrhea was more frequent in the RT-5FU arm. Conclusions: Based on these data, gemcitabine/cisplatin-based CRT does not achieve a higher clinical efficacy compared to RT-5FU, and is associated with increased hematological toxicity. [Table: see text]

Phase II Trial of Chronomodulated Infusion of High-Dose Fluorouracil and l-Folinic Acid in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1175-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Curé ◽  
V. Chevalier ◽  
A. Adenis ◽  
N. Tubiana-Mathieu ◽  
G. Niezgodzki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Folinic Acid ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
High Dose

PURPOSE: To study tolerability and efficacy of an intensified chronomodulated schedule of fluorouracil (5-FU) and l-folinic acid (l-FA) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, 5-FU was given near individually determined dose-limiting toxicity in a multicenter phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients (68 men and 32 women, median age 62 years, World Health Organization performance status ≤ 2) with previously untreated and inoperable metastases received chronomodulated daily infusion of 5-FU/l-FA (from 10:00 pm to 10:00 am with peak at 4:00 am). 5-FU dose was escalated from 900 to 1,100 mg/m2/d with fixed dose of l-FA at 150 mg/m2/d for 4 days every 14 days. RESULTS: 5-FU dose escalation was achieved in 66% of the patients. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities mainly consisted of nausea or vomiting (14% of patients and 1.5% of courses), hand-foot syndrome (38% of patients and 8% of courses), mucositis (26% of patients and 4% of courses), and diarrhea (21% of patients and 2.3% of courses). Objective response rate (ORR) was 41% (95% confidence interval, 31.5% to 50.5%). Twenty patients underwent metastases surgery; among these, 12 had a complete resection. Median progression-free survival was 7 months. Median survival was 17 months; 28% of the patients were alive at 2 years and 18.6% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: The ORR achieved with intensified chronomodulated delivery of 5-FU/l-FA was nearly twice as high as that earlier obtained by our cooperative group using less intensive 5-FU/FA chronotherapy.

Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Rougier ◽  
R Bugat ◽  
J Y Douillard ◽  
S Culine ◽  
E Suc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred thirteen patients (aged 18 to 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 3 months were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All 178 patients eligible for efficacy analysis had not received more than one prior fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimen (adjuvant or palliative) and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS Primary tumor sites were the colon (71%) and rectum (28%). Sixty-six percent of the patients had > or = two metastatic sites. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had undergone previous surgery, and 77.5% had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two of 178 eligible patients achieved on objective response (four complete responses [CRs] and 28 partial responses [PRs]; response rate, 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12.6% to 24.4%), 65 were stable, and 59 progressed. The response rate was 17.7% in the pretreated group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy-naive group. Within the former subgroup, response rates of 16.1% were reported in patients who were progressive on prior 5-FU chemotherapy and 19.1% in patients who were progressive off such treatment. The median duration of objective response (9.1 months) and median time to achievement of a response (9.3 weeks) did not differ between chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, which developed in 80% of the patients, delayed diarrhea (87%), alopecia (88%), fatigue (81%), and nausea/vomiting (77%). All these adverse events were manageable. Severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was only observed in 18% of the cycles, leukopenia in 11%, delayed diarrhea in 11%, and nausea and vomiting in 3%. Development of simultaneous grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and delayed diarrhea during 4% of the cycles was the safety issue of greatest concern. CONCLUSION CPT-11 has definite activity in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients who experienced disease progression on 5-FU, which suggests a lack of cross-resistance between CPT-11 and 5-FU. Diarrhea and neutropenia, the major toxicities of CPT-11, contribute to the risk to develop febrile neutropenic sepsis.

scholarly journals Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study Group

Blood ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
JF Bishop ◽  
RM Lowenthal ◽  
D Joshua ◽  
JP Matthews ◽  
D Todd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Patients ◽  
World Health ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Acute Nonlymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Remission Duration ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Additional Clinical Benefit ◽  
Health Organization

Abstract Previously untreated patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) aged 15 to 70 years were randomized to either cytosine arabinoside 100 mg/m2/d continuous intravenous (IV) infusion days 1 through 7, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 3 (7–3), or the same drugs intensified with etoposide 75 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 7 (7–3–7) as induction therapy. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) received two courses of consolidation therapy (5–2 or 5–2–5) followed by maintenance therapy. Of 264 eligible patients, CR occurred in 56% of 7– 3 and 59% of 7–3–7 patients; 7–3–7 significantly improved remission duration (P = .01). The median remission duration was 12 months for 7–3 and 18 months for 7–3–7. Survival was similar when the two arms were compared overall. Subset analysis performed to identify patients with the most benefit showed that etoposide significantly prolonged remission duration in younger patients (less than 55 years) with a median of 12 months for 7–3 and 27 months for 7–3–7 (P = .01). Survival appeared to be prolonged with 7–3–7 in patients aged less than 55 years, with a median of 9 months for 7–3 as compared with 17 months for 7–3–7 (P = .03). In older patients (aged greater than or equal to 55 years), 7–3–7 was more toxic, with significantly more severe [World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 or 4] stomatitis (P = .02) and no additional clinical benefit. Hematologic toxicity for induction courses was similar, with granulocytopenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L for a median of 16 days per course for 7–3 and 15 days for 7–3–7. Hematologic toxicity was more severe for 5–2–5 consolidation courses (P = .003). Induction and consolidation therapy intensified with etoposide resulted in significantly improved remission duration but not survival.

A phase II trial of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14599-14599
Author(s):  
N. Lee ◽  
S. Bae ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
D. Kim ◽  
K. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

14599 Background: We prospectively conducted a phase II trial to test the efficacy and safety of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) regimens for the first-line treatment of previously untreated patients with recurrent or metastatic advanced CRC. Methods: Thirty-four previously untreated patients with advanced CRC were enrolled in this study from June 2001 to December 2006. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, no prior systemic therapy in palliative setting, ECOG PS = 2, adequate organ function, written informed consent and at least one measurable disease. The patients received either irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1 with a LV bolus of 200 mg/m2 and a FU bolus of 400 mg/m2, and this was followed by a FU continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 2 (the classic FOLFIRI regimen), or they were treated with a LV bolus of 400 mg/m2 and a FU bolus of 400 mg/m2 followed by a FU continuous infusion of 2,400 mg/m2 for 46 hours (the simplified FOLFIRI regimen), and these treatments were repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression. Results: There were 13 females and 21 males with median age of 54 years (range: 41–79). The most common metastatic sites were lung and liver. A total of 262 cycles were administrated with median 6 cycles per patient (range: 1–22). All pts were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 pts for response to the treatment. The objective response rate was 26.4% with 2 complete responses respectively. Sixteen (47%) pts had stable disease and 7 (20.5%) had a progression. The tumor control rate was 73.4%. The median TTP was 5.3 months, and the overall survival was 10.1 months. The prognostic factor for longer TTP and survival was the ECOG performance status (PS). The type of regimens was not affected on response rate, TTP and survival. The chemotherapy was generally well tolerated and the most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia, diarrhea. The non- hematological toxicities were similar for both treatment groups, with more frequent grade =3 neutropenia being noted for the simplified FOLFIRI regimen. Conclusions: The FOLFIRI regimen was demonstrated to have a moderate antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity profiles, and tend to show more favorable outcome for patients with good ECOG PS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of the c-Met inhibitor tepotinib in advanced lung adenocarcinoma with MET exon 14 skipping mutations.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20541-e20541
Author(s):  
Paul K. Paik ◽  
Enriqueta Felip ◽  
Remi Veillon ◽  
Jürgen Scheele ◽  
Rolf Bruns
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Met Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinomas ◽  
Platinum Doublet

e20541 Background: Approximately 3-4% of lung adenocarcinomas express a truncated form of c-Met (c-Metex14) due to mutation-induced exon 14 skipping. c-Metex14 accumulates on the cell surface and is constitutively active with the ability to drive NSCLC. Data suggest that lung adenocarcinomas harboring c-METex14 are sensitive to c-Met kinase inhibitors. The highly selective c-Met inhibitor tepotinib is well tolerated and active at an oral dose of 500 mg QD. This single-arm phase II trial (NCT02864992) is investigating the efficacy and safety of tepotinib in patients (pts) with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring METex14. Methods: Adults with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma who have failed 1 or 2 lines of systemic therapy, including a platinum doublet-containing regimen, are eligible. Tumors must harbor mutations that are known to cause exon 14 skipping, confirmed by a central laboratory, but not activating EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. Pts receive tepotinib 500 mg QD until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal from treatment for other reasons. The primary endpoint is objective response rate. Secondary endpoints include progression-free and overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics, and quality of life. Recruitment of 60 patients in Europe, USA, and Japan is planned. Results: Four pts (age 64–77 years; 3 stage IV, 1 stage IIIB, all Caucasian males) have been enrolled. All had received two prior chemotherapy regimens including a platinum doublet. Pts have currently completed 1–5 cycles of tepotinib therapy. The majority of adverse events observed to date have been grade 1/2 in severity; grade 3 disease-related dyspnea, pulmonary embolism, and pleural effusion were observed in one patient and grade 3 tepotinib-related elevated serum amylase in another. Of the 3 pts with post-baseline tumor evaluations, two have had an unconfirmed partial response and the third (with only one post-baseline assessment) stable disease. Conclusions: These initial data suggest that the efficacy of tepotinib 500 mg QD is comparable to that of less selective c-Met inhibitors in pts with c-METex14 NSCLC (ORR > 40%). Tepotinib is also well tolerated. Recruitment to the trial is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02864992.

Oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and cetuximab in advanced gastric cancer. First efficacy results of a multicenter phase II trial (AGMT Gastric-2) of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentoese Tumortherapie (AGMT)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4538-4538
Author(s):  
E. Woell ◽  
R. Greil ◽  
W. Eisterer ◽  
M. Fridrik ◽  
B. Grünberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Setting

4538 Background: Patients (pts.) suffering from advanced gastric cancer have still a poor prognosis and treatment options are limited. In our previous phase II trial (AGMT-Gastric-1) we could show that the combination of oxaliplatin and irinotecan was well tolerated and showed an objective response rate of 58% (Anticancer Res 28:2901–2906, 2008). This chemotherapy regimen was tested in combination with cetuximab in a multicenter phase II trial. Methods: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 biweekly and irinotecan 125 mg/m2 biweekly were combined with cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose and subsequently weekly 250 mg/m2. 51 patients with histological proven unresectable and/or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma were treated in a first line setting. Median age: 62 years (range 19–79 years), PS 0: 25 patients, PS 1+2 26 patients, single metastatic site: 24 patients, multiple metastases: 27 patients. Results: Frequently reported adverse events (more than 20% of pts.) were predominantly grade 1 or 2 and included neutropenia (35% of pts.), thrombocytopenia (33%), anemia (73%), nausea (45%), diarrhea (57%), alopecia (22%), and fatigue (37%). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 9/1 pts., thrombocytopenia in 1/0 pts., anemia in 3/1 pts., nausea in 2/0 pts., and diarrhea in 7/2 pts. Sensory neuropathy occurred mostly as grade 1 and 2 in 37% of pts., in 7 pts. grade 3 neurotoxicity was observed. Acneiform skin rash grade 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 was reported in 31% / 20% / 6% / 2% of pts. respectively. 16 pts. went off-study due to neutropenia (n=5), nausea/vomiting (n=1), diarrhea (n=1), progressive disease (n=3), toxic colon (n=2), and allergic reaction to cetuximab at first (n=2), second (n=1) or third infusion (n=1). 35 patients are assessable for response with 1 pt. (3%) showing a CR, 21 pts. (60%) a PR, 7 pts. (20%) a SD and PD in 6 pts. (17%). A disease control rate was achieved in 83%. Median time to progression was 24.8 weeks (n=29), median overall survival 38.1 weeks (n=32). Conclusions: The combination of oxaliplatin and irinotecan with cetuximab is feasible, safe and active in advanced gastric cancer. [Table: see text]

A single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the combination of cetuximab plus docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) as induction chemotherapy (IC) in patients (pts) with unresectable SCCHN

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6015-6015 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Mesia ◽  
S. Vázquez ◽  
J. J. Grau ◽  
J. A. García-Sáenz ◽  
C. Bayona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Concomitant Boost ◽  
Secondary Neoplasm ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

6015 Background: TPF combination is the new standard IC. Adding cetuximab to PF chemotherapy is superior to PF alone in metastatic disease. We incorporated cetuximab into IC with TPF and subsequent radiotherapy (RT) in unresectable SCCHN. Methods: Phase II trial conducted in 7 Spanish hospitals. Previously untreated pts aged 18–70 yrs, ECOG PS 0–1 with unresectable SCCHN were eligible. Induction comprised T 75mg/m2 day 1, P 75mg/m2 day 1, F 750mg/m2 days 1–5, and cetuximab 250mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 (initial dose 400mg/m2 on cycle (C) 1, day 1), repeated every 21 days x 4 C, with prophylactic antibiotics and G-CSF support. Subsequently, pts received accelerated RT with a concomitant boost (69.9Gy) and cetuximab 250mg/m2 weekly. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (RR) to cetuximab TPF as neoadjuvant therapy. Simon's optimal two-stage design was used to calculate the sample size of 49 evaluable pts. Results: 50 pts were enrolled: median age 54 yrs (33–68); 44 male; all stage IV (T4=31, N2–3=40). Primary sites were: oropharynx, 23; hypopharynx, 16; oral cavity, 5; larynx, 4.41(82%) pts received all 4 cycles of cetuximab TPF; 47 pts received ≥2 C and were evaluable for response using RECIST. 3 pts received <2 C (2 deaths from intercurrent disease and febrile neutropenia, 1 secondary neoplasm diagnosed). The table shows RR. Serious grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were: neutropenia 24%; neutropenic fever 20%; infection 6%; thrombocytopenia 4%; diarrhea 12%; hepatotoxicity 4%; hypomagnesemia 2%. Grade 3 AEs were: nausea/vomiting 2%; mucositis 6%; renal failure 4%; asthenia 4%; rash 4%; hypotension 4%. There were 2 AE-related deaths (febrile neutropenia and hepatic insufficiency). Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab to TPF IC in pts with unresectable SCCHN yields a high RR, mainly CR, potentially prolonging survival. Cetuximab TPF combination should be given to pts with good PS with specialized support provided. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document