Phase II study of vinorelbine in patients with pretreated advanced ovarian cancer: activity in platinum-resistant disease.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2546-2551 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Bajetta ◽  
A Di Leo ◽  
L Biganzoli ◽  
L Mariani ◽  
F Cappuzzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Resistant Disease ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Exact Confidence Interval

PURPOSE The aim of the study was to evaluate the activity of vinorelbine (VNLB) in a population of advanced ovarian cancer patients, with particular attention to defining its role in platinum-resistant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-three patients were recruited and treated with VNLB 25 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) weekly. the median age was 53 years, performance status 0 to 2, and number of previous chemotherapy regimens two (range, one to five). Twenty-four patients were platinum-resistant; the remaining nine either were platinum-sensitive (four cases) or had undetermined sensitivity (five cases). RESULTS The mean delivered dose-intensity of VNLB was 67% of the planned level, because 60% of the cycles were delayed due to neutropenia or anemia. Four partial responses (PRs) and one complete response (CR) were observed, for an overall response rate of 15% (95% exact confidence interval, 5.1% to 31.9%). All the responses occurred in the subgroup of 24 platinum-resistant cases, in whom the response rate was 21% (95% exact confidence interval, 7.1% to 42.1%). Seven patients became stabilized on VNLB, and 27% of the cases showed a reduction in serum cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) levels. G3/G4 side effects consisted of neutropenia, anemia, and worsening of preexisting peripheral neuropathy. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION VNLB led to a 21% response rate in the population of heavily pretreated and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. Further studies of VNLB alone or in combination with taxanes are warranted in patients with less pretreatment.

INNOVATE: A phase II study of TTFields (200 kHz) concomitant with weekly paclitaxel for recurrent ovarian cancer—Updated safety and efficacy results.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5580-5580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
Roger von Moos ◽  
Luis Manso ◽  
Cristiana Sessa
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Intermediate Frequency ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Platinum Resistant

5580 Background: TTFields are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality, which have been approved for the treatment of recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma by the FDA. TTFields act by delivering intermediate frequency alternating electric fields to the tumor, predominantly by disrupting the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase. INNOVATE was the first trial testing TTFields (200kHz) in ovarian cancer patients. Methods: Thirty-one recurrent, platinum-resistant, unresectable ovarian cancer patients were enrolled in the INNOVATE trial and treated with TTFields in combination with weekly paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was treatment emergent adverse events. Secondary endpoints included progression free-survival, overall survival and radiological response rate. Results: The median age was 60 (range – 45-77), most patients (77%) had serous histology. 52% had an ECOG score of 0. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 4.1 (range 1-11). All patients were platinum-resistant, and 97% of patients received prior taxane-containing regimens. Ten (32%) patients suffered from serious adverse events (SAEs) during the study, none were related to TTFields. Of all reported SAEs, 31% were related to gastrointestinal disorders (ileus, jaundice and ascites) and 31% were respiratory events (dyspnea, pleural effusion and pulmonary embolism). Only one SAE which, related to the tumor, led to permanent discontinuation of the device. Most patients were reported to have mild-moderate, TTFields-related skin irritation, out of whom only two patients (6.4%) had severe-grade events. The median PFS was 8.9 months (95% CI 4.7, NA). Of the evaluable tumors, 25% had partial response and another 46.4% stable disease – a clinical benefit of 71.4%. Six patients (19.4%) had a CA 125 response, translating into a decrease of 50% or more in serum levels. The median OS was not reached. Conclusions: TTFields concomitant to weekly paclitaxel are tolerable and safe in heavily pre-treated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer ovarian cancer patients. These data support further clinical testing of TTFields with chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02244502.

Role of Extended Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients with High Posttreatment Serum CA-125 Levels

2011 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sokbom Kang ◽  
Tae-Joong Kim ◽  
Sang-Soo Seo ◽  
Byoung-Gie Kim ◽  
Duk-Soo Bae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Ca 125

scholarly journals 767P Retrospective analysis of the impact of bevacizumab dose-intensity on the survival of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S750-S751
Author(s):  
J.A. Bahena ◽  
L. Cetina-Pérez ◽  
D. Gallardo-Rincón ◽  
P. Cabrera-Galeana ◽  
G.C. Alamilla Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
The Impact

Carboplatin plus ifosfamide as salvage treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: a pilot study.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1952-1956 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Lorusso ◽  
A Catino ◽  
B Leone ◽  
M Rabinovich ◽  
G Gargano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Previous Response ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Platinum Resistant

PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of carboplatin (PPL) and ifosfamide (IFO) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin (CDDP)-containing regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS From July 1989 to December 1991, 35 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer relapsed or refractory to CDDP as first-line chemotherapy were treated. PPL was administered at a dose of 300 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and IFO at a dose of 1,500 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 3 every 3 to 4 weeks. Criteria for evaluating previous response to CDDP were strictly defined. RESULTS The overall response rate was 43% (complete response [CR], 6%; partial response [PR], 37%) and the median duration of response was 7 months (range, 3 to 16). In potentially platinum-sensitive (PPS; relapsed) patients, the overall response rate was 56%. None of the primary platinum-resistant (PPR) patients obtained a clinical response to PPL plus IFO, whereas one of five secondary platinum-resistant (SPR) patients obtained a PR. The regimen was easily manageable. CONCLUSION PPL plus IFO is useful and well-tolerated combination in salvage treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. However, clear synergism between PPL and IFO that could overcome intrinsic or acquired CDDP resistance was not observed. The advantage of PPL plus IFO as compared with CDDP-containing regimens is represented by the increased tolerability and the reduced neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and ototoxicity as compared with CDDP-containing regimens. It is essential that the patient population be defined according to their previous response to platinum therapy in trials involving second-line therapy of ovarian cancer.

Clinical activity of imatinib mesylate in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer—Hoosier Oncology Group GYN03–62

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5091-5091 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Matei ◽  
R. E. Emerson ◽  
N. Menning ◽  
J. Schilder ◽  
J. McClean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Cells ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Platinum Resistant

5091 Background: Ovarian tumors harborc-Kit and PDGF receptors. We showed in an in-vitro model that Imatinib (G) inhibits the growth of ovarian cancer cells. We hypothesized that G in combination with chemotherapy inhibits the growth of ovarian tumors. Data from a phase II clinical trial utilizing G in combination with Docetaxel (D) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC) are presented. Methods: This was an open label, one stage, multi-center phase II clinical trial. Planned sample size was 23. Patients with relapsed, platinum-resistant or refractory OC expressing PDGFR or c-kit were eligible. PDGFR and c-kit expression was assessed prior to enrollment by IHC using archival tumor tissue. G was administered at 600mg/d continuously and D was given weekly (30mg/m2) for 4 weeks, with 2 weeks break. Each cycle was 6 weeks, with a maximum of 6 cycles allowed. Tumor assessments were obtained after 2, 4 and 6 cycles. Response rate by RECIST was the primary endpoint. Results: 34 patients were screened. 17 tumors were c-kit + and 25 were PDGFRα +. 23 patients were enrolled. Of those, 4 patients had c-kit+/PDGFR- tumors, 12 were PDGFR+/c-kit- and 7 were c-kit+/PDGFR+. Median age was 55 (range 33–76) and median PS was 0 (range 0–2). Median number of prior treatments was 3 (range 1–9). Efficacy and toxicity data are available for 20 and 14 patients, respectively. Based on RECIST, there were 3 patients with PR and 3 patients with SD lasting at least 12 weeks. Of these 6 patients, 2 pts were c-kit+, 2 were PDGFR+ and 2 were PDGFR and c-kit+. All 6 patients had carboplatin and taxane resistant disease. Grade 3–4 toxicities were: neutropenia (2), thrombocytopenia (1), fatigue (1), dehydration (1), constipation (1), cardiac ischemia (1), nausea/vomiting (2), urinary frequency (1). Other G1–2 toxicities were: N/V (9), diarrhea (7), fatigue (8), mucositis (4), anemia (4), hypocalcemia (5), rash (6), anorexia (7), edema (5), hemolysis (1), non-neutropenic infections (7). Additional data will be available in May 2006. Conclusions: The combination G+D is tolerated well. Clinical activity consisted of 3 PRs (15% response rate) and 3 SD > 3 months in pts with heavily pre-treated, platinum resistant OC expressing c-kit or PDGFRα. [Table: see text]

Panitumumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer with KRAS wild-type: The PaLiDo study, a phase II nonrandomized multicenter study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5052-5052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Dahl Steffensen ◽  
Marianne Waldstrøm ◽  
Niels Pallisgaard ◽  
Bente Lund ◽  
Kjell Bergfeldt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Dermatologic Toxicity

5052 Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) patients with platinum-resistant recurrent disease have few therapeutic options and the response rates are only 10-20% using non-cross-resistant chemotherapeutic agents. The increasing number of negative trials for OC treatment has prompted an evaluation of new biologic agents, which in combination with chemotherapy may result in improvement in survival. Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody specific to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). No previous studies have evaluated the effect of panitumumab in OC based on KRAS mutation status. The main purpose was to investigate the response rate in platinum-resistant, KRAS wild-type OC patients treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) supplemented with panitumumab. Methods: Major eligibility criteria were confirmed stage I-IV primary epithelial ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer patients with progression either during or within 6 months after end of first or second line platinum-based chemotherapy. Only patients with measurable disease by CA125 criteria and with KRAS wild type were eligible. Patients were treated with panitumumab 6 mg/kg day 1 and day 15 and with PLD 40 mg/m² day 1, every 4 weeks. Tumor assessment was performed at baseline and at every third cycle according to CA-125 criteria. Results: A total of 46 patients were enrolled by 6 study sites in this multi-institutional phase II trial. Within the population evaluable for response (N=33), there was 8 CA125 responders for an overall response rate of 24.3 %. Progression-free and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population (N=43) was 2.7 months (2.5-3.2 months, 95%CI) and 8.1 months (5.6-11.7 months, 95%CI), respectively. The most common treatment related grade 3 toxicities included skin toxicity (42%), fatigue (19%) and vomiting (12%). Conclusions: The combination of PLD and panitumumab demonstrates efficacy in platinum refractory/resistant patients although the dermatologic toxicity was considerable.

Second-Line Treatment with Intravenous Gemcitabine and Oral Etoposide in Platinum-Resistant Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients: Results of a Phase II Study

Oncology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 80 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 238-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bruzzone ◽  
M.G. Centurioni ◽  
P. Giglione ◽  
M. Gualco ◽  
D.F. Merlo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Oral Etoposide ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Platinum Resistant

Salvage Chemotherapy with Paclitaxel in Platinum-Resistant Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients

Oncology ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 349-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bruzzone ◽  
E. Catsafados ◽  
L. Miglietta ◽  
D. Amoroso ◽  
F. Pedulla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Resistant

Uplift (ENGOT-ov67): A pivotal cohort to evaluate XMT-1536 (upifitamab rilsodotin), a NaPi2b-directed antibody drug conjugate for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5607-TPS5607
Author(s):  
Debra L. Richardson ◽  
Erika P. Hamilton ◽  
Ana Oaknin ◽  
Leslie M. Randall ◽  
Susana N. Banerjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Regulatory Review ◽  
Platinum Resistant

TPS5607 Background: XMT-1536 (upifitamab rilsodotin), is a first-in-class Dolaflexin ADC targeting NaPi2b, a sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein, broadly expressed in solid tumors such as serous epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) and non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma. XMT-1536 uses the Dolaflexin platform to deliver approximately 10 DolaLock auristatin payload molecules per antibody and is being evaluated in a Phase I study (NCT03319628). Observation of preliminary antitumor activity was reported in the ovarian cancer expansion cohort, including in patients previously treated with bevacizumab and PARPi (Tolcher et al, ASCO 2019; Richardson et al, ASCO 2019; Hamilton et al, ESMO 2020). Updated data on the OC cohort included 31 patients with higher NaPi2b expression as of December 2020 (Mersana Therapeutics, 2021). In these patients, the ORR was 32% and the DCR was 74%. Complete responses were observed in 2 patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, both of whom had received prior treatment with bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors. Platinum resistant ovarian cancer remains a serious unmet medical need as treatment options are limited and response rates to these treatments are low. Based on the favorable safety and efficacy profile of XMT-1536, UPLIFT was designed as a Phase 2 single-arm registrational cohort of patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancer as part of the ongoing Phase I FIH dose escalation and expansion study to accelerate development and provide a streamlined pathway to regulatory review. Methods: The UPLIFT cohort is enrolling patients with platinum resistant high grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer with up to 4 prior lines of therapy. The RP2D of XMT-1536 was determined to be 43 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 4 weeks (q4w) and will be the dose evaluated in the UPLIFT cohort. UPLIFT will enroll approximately 180 patients with platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer to obtain approximately 100 patients with higher NaPi2b expression. Prior bevacizumab is required for those patients with 1 or 2 prior lines of therapy. Tumor samples (fresh or archived) will be collected prior to enrollment for retrospective tumor tissue evaluation of NaPi2b expression. The primary objective is assessment of confirmed objective response rate to XMT-1536 as assessed by Investigator in patients with higher NaPi2b expression. Secondary endpoints include confirmed objective response rate regardless of NaPi2b expression, duration of response, and adverse events. Correlative aims include assessing blood and tissue biomarkers for association with clinical benefit. This study is being conducted in collaboration with ENGOT and GOG. Patients will be enrolled globally. Clinical trial information: NCT03319628.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document