Decision analysis in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: is it useful?

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 873-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
M D Brundage ◽  
P A Groome ◽  
D Feldman-Stewart ◽  
J R Davidson ◽  
W J Mackillop

PURPOSE The optimal management of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been established. While combined-modality treatments have been shown to increase the survival of patients with this illness, the appropriate balance between the benefit of increased quantity of life and the quality-of-life costs of the more toxic treatment combinations remains unresolved. Decision analysis has been promoted as useful when medical decisions must be made under conditions of uncertainty. We consider the potential of this method to guide therapy in locally advanced NSCLC. METHODS We developed two types of decision models that addressed the choice between radiation alone and combined chemotherapy-radiation therapy in locally advanced NSCLC. The models were constructed using the principles of decision analysis. RESULTS The models successfully replicated results of relevant clinical trials published in the literature. The analyses of both models showed that the treatment decision was sensitive to patients' values, despite significant increases in survival rates. The models clarified a need for further validation of the three fundamental components: structuring the decision, determining the probabilities of events, and assigning utilities to treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION In the setting of NSCLC, the models suggest that quality-of-life considerations are important in the treatment choice. Further research is required to identify the health states critical to the decision, the probabilities for occurrence of these health states, and valid measures of their utility.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Li ◽  
Chunbo Zhai ◽  
Jianpeng Che ◽  
Weiqian Wang ◽  
Bingchun Liu

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors were used for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) more and more frequently and the effects were thrilling. Toripalimab as a new immune checkpoint inhibitor has been shown to be effective in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, data regarding the safety and feasibility of surgical resection after treatment with toripalimab for NSCLC remain scarce. Here, we present a case with locally advanced NSCLC that received video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy after treatment with toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy.Case presentation: A 62-year-old male patient with a history of coronary artery stenting operation for two times was found a 3.4 × 3.2cm cavity mass in the upper lobe of the left lung and enlarged left hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. Pathological results identified squamous cell carcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with a locally advanced NSCLC and received VATS left upper lobectomy and lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus toripalimab for 3 cycles. The postoperative pathological results showed complete tumor remission. Short-term follow-up results were excellent, and long-term results remain to be revealed.Conclusions: Our preliminary results showed that the use of neoadjuvant toripalimab and chemotherapy for the locally advanced NSCLC before surgical resection is safe and feasible.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7515-7515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Katakami ◽  
Akihiko Gemma ◽  
Hiroshi Sakai ◽  
Kaoru Kubota ◽  
Makoto Nishio ◽  
...  

7515 Background: Although molecularly targeted therapy improves outcome of selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most of the patients ultimately become candidates of cytotoxic chemotherapy, which is the cornerstone of patient management. S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) has shown activity and good tolerability in phase II settings. Docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP) is the only third-generation regimen that demonstrated statistically significant improvement of overall survival and quality of life by head to head comparison with a second-generation regimen, vindesine plus cisplatin, in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: Patients with previously untreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, an ECOG PS of 0-1 and adequate organ functions were randomized to receive either oral S-1 80 mg/m2/day (40 mg/m2 b.i.d.) on days 1 to 21 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 8 every 5 weeks or docetaxel 60mg/m2 on day 1 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks, both up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Non-inferiority study design was employed as upper confidence interval (CI) limit for HR<1.322. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), response, safety, and quality of life (QOL). Results: From April 2007 to December 2008, 608 patients from 66 sites in Japan were randomized to SP (n=303) or DP (n=305). Patient demographics were well balanced between the two groups. Two interim analyses were preplanned. At the final analysis, total of 480 death events were observed. The primary endpoint was met. OS for SP was non inferior to DP (median survival, 16.1 v 17.1 months, respectively; HR=1.013; 96.4% CI, 0.837-1.227). PFS was 4.9 months in the SP arm and 5.2 months in the DP arm. Statistically significantly lower rate of febrile neutropenia (7.4% v 1.0%), grade 3/4 neutropenia (73.4% v 22.9%), grade 3/4 infection (14.5% v 5.3%), grade 1/2 alopecia (59.3% v 12.3%) were observed in the SP arm than in the DP arm. QOL data investigated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13 favored for the SP arm. Conclusions: S-1 plus cisplatin is a standard first-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Maria Rodriguez ◽  
Elizabeth M Duus ◽  
John Friend

71 Background: The main objectives of this study were to characterize and compare the burden of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who reported considerable weight loss ( ≥ 5% of their body weight in the past 6 months or ≥ 2% for a BMI less than 20 kg/m2) to those who did not. Methods: 95 advanced NSCLC patients were surveyed from the online patient-powered community PatientsLikeMe. Self-reported demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Appetite, distress and concerns, health-related quality of life (QLQ-C15-PAL) and anorexia-cachexia symptoms/concerns (FAACT A/CS) were summarized. The results obtained between patients who lost considerable weight and those who did not were compared, using a two-tailed t-test or a Kruskal-Wallis test. Patients with weight loss were additionally asked open-ended questions on burden and concerns. Results: 35 (37%) patients were classified as having considerable weight loss at the time of the survey and 60 (63%) where classified without. Most patients were female (81%), American (81%), and mean age was 59 years. 61% of patients indicated not receiving either chemotherapy or radiotherapy at the time of the survey. Patients with weight loss reported significantly (p < 0.05) lower overall quality of life (55.2 vs. 66.9), worsened anorexia-cachexia symptoms/concerns (30.7 vs. 36.0), and higher symptomology, specifically fatigue (64.8 vs. 49.1), nausea (19.5 vs. 9.2), and appetite loss (41.0 vs. 23.9) – than patients without weight loss. In addition, significantly more patients who lost weight reported moderate/high distress levels than patients who did not (71% vs. 38%). For patients with weight loss, change in food taste, fatigue, and decrease in appetite were the most frequently reported symptoms with the greatest impact on their lives. Conclusions: Our results support that weight loss negatively affects cancer patients’ quality of life and is associated with more distress and symptoms—particularly fatigue, and appetite loss. Weight loss-related symptoms also significantly impact their lives. Interventions targeted at maintaining/increasing body weight may help to improve well-being and reduce key symptoms in advanced NSCLC patients with considerable weight loss.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Swaminath ◽  
E. T. Vella ◽  
K. Ramchandar ◽  
A. Robinson ◽  
C. Simone ◽  
...  

Background: Chemoradiation with curative intent is considered standard of care in patients with locally-advanced, stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there may be patients with stage III (N2 or N3, including T4) NSCLC who may be eligible for surgery. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the efficacy of surgery after chemoradiotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally-advanced NSCLC.Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgery after chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with stage III (N2 or N3, excluding T4) NSCLC.Results: Three included RCTs consistently found no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients with locally-advanced NSCLC who received surgery and chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy alone. Only one RCT found a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with chemoradiation and surgery (HR, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.96). In a post-hoc analysis of the same trial, the rate of overall survival was higher in the surgical group compared with patients matched in the chemoradiation-alone group if a lobectomy was performed (p=0.002), but not when a pneumonectomy was performed. Furthermore, fewer treatment-related deaths occurred among patients who received lobectomy compared with pneumonectomy.Conclusion: For patients with locally-advanced NSCLC, the benefits of surgery following chemoradiation were uncertain. Surgery after chemoradiation for patients who do not require a pneumonectomy may be an option.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 621-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwin H.J. Tonk ◽  
Anne S.R. van Lindert ◽  
Joost J.C. Verhoeff ◽  
Karijn P.M. Suijkerbuijk

In locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, consolidation therapy with durvalumab (an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) has proven to significantly increase both progression free and overall survival after chemoradiotherapy. Here, we describe a case of acute pneumonitis during durvalumab administration for locally advanced NSCLC, causing persistent symptomatology and steroid treatment to date. To our knowledge, acute-onset pneumonitis during infusion of a PD-L1 inhibitor has not been described previously. This case illustrates that ICI-induced pneumonitis can occur anytime during treatment, especially after chemoradiation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18502-e18502
Author(s):  
S. Ma ◽  
Y. Xu ◽  
X. Yu

e18502 Background: Pemetrexed in combination with carboplatin has been shown to have promising activity, as well as superior toxicity profile in advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Radiotherapy(RT) has been shown to improve survival of patients with locally advanced NSCLC when combined with other platin doublets. This phase II study of concomitant pemetrexed/carboplatin chemotherapy(CT) with 3-D conformal RT followed by pemetrexed/carboplatin consolidation CT in locally advanced NSCLC was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this novel regimen. This report presents preliminary information of 10 patients who have completed treatment. Methods: 10 chemoradiation (CRT)-naive and stage IIIA or IIIB (not effusion) with KPS≥80 patients were included in this study between February 2008 and October 2008. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, carboplatin AUC 5 CT repeated q3 weeks for 2 cycles concomitant with RT and 3 cycles of consolidation pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC=5) q3 weeks. Median total dose of RT, without elective nodal irradiation, was 62 Gy (range: 60-66 Gy) with 2 Gy daily fractions. Results: 1 (10%) and 8 patients (80%) had a complete or partial response respectively, while 1 patient(10%) had progression of the disease(brain metastases). The overall response rate (90%,95% confidence interval (CI): 68%-97%) exceeded the goal per study design. After concomitant CRT, the main toxicity was neutropenia, with a median ANC nadir of 1.6, three patients had Grade 3 neutropenia, One patient had Grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen in one patient, grade 3 esophagitis in one patient and grade 3 radiation pneumonitis in one patient. Consolidation CT was not administered to 3 patients- one due to the development of brain metastases during the first month after chemoradiation, one due to patient refusal and one due to grade 3 radiation pneumonitis. Conclusions: This preliminary data suggests that concomitant treatment was well tolerated, with promising activity and a significant improvement of QoL in a Chinese population with locally advanced NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7020-7020
Author(s):  
Wen Wen Shan ◽  
Sophie Sun ◽  
Janessa J. Laskin ◽  
Cheryl Ho ◽  
Barbara L. Melosky ◽  
...  

7020 Background: The role of surgery following concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial, with high surgical mortality rates reported in a large randomized clinical trial. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation with or without surgery over an 11 period at the BC Cancer Agency. Methods: Patients were identified by the Vancouver Centre Pharmacy database. Charts were reviewed and data extracted included patient characteristics, weight loss, performance status, and method of mediastinal staging. Outcome measures were overall survival, pathological response rate, and treatment-associated morbidity and mortality. Results: Between January 1999-2010, 177 patients were identified with locally advanced NSCLC (stage IIIA/B) treated with platinum and etoposide and ≥40Gy radiation therapy, with or without surgical resection. The majority of treatment plans were reached by a multidisciplinary conference consensus. 74% (n=131) of patients received chemoradiation alone (bimodality therapy) and 36% (n=46) received chemoradiation followed by surgical resection (trimodality therapy). Among the trimodality therapy group, 16 patients underwent pneumonectomy and 30 lobectomy. Conclusions: In this series, bimodality therapy for patients with locally advanced NSCLC had similar treatment associated mortality and survival outcomes as reported in the literature. Trimodality therapy was associated with low treatment mortality rates and favourable survival. These two groups cannot be directly compared in this retrospective study. However, these results support a multidisciplinary approach to identify and carefully select patients with locally advanced NSCLC to undergo additional surgical resection following concurrent chemoradiation. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document