scholarly journals Total Body Irradiation or Chemotherapy Conditioning in Childhood ALL: A Multinational, Randomized, Noninferiority Phase III Study

2020 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02529
Author(s):  
Christina Peters ◽  
Jean-Hugues Dalle ◽  
Franco Locatelli ◽  
Ulrike Poetschger ◽  
Petr Sedlacek ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Total body irradiation (TBI) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is efficacious, but long-term side effects are concerning. We investigated whether preparative combination chemotherapy could replace TBI in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS FORUM is a randomized, controlled, open-label, international, multicenter, phase III, noninferiority study. Patients ≤ 18 years at diagnosis, 4-21 years at HSCT, in complete remission pre-HSCT, and with an HLA-compatible related or unrelated donor were randomly assigned to myeloablative conditioning with fractionated 12 Gy TBI and etoposide versus fludarabine, thiotepa, and either busulfan or treosulfan. The noninferiority margin was 8%. With 1,000 patients randomly assigned in 5 years, 2-year minimum follow-up, and one-sided alpha of 5%, 80% power was calculated. A futility stopping rule would halt random assignment if chemoconditioning was significantly inferior to TBI (EudraCT: 2012-003032-22; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01949129 ). RESULTS Between April 2013 and December 2018, 543 patients were screened, 417 were randomly assigned, 212 received TBI, and 201 received chemoconditioning. The stopping rule was applied on March 31, 2019. The median follow-up was 2.1 years. In the intention-to-treat population, 2-year overall survival (OS) was significantly higher following TBI (0.91; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.95; P < .0001) versus chemoconditioning (0.75; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.81). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse and treatment-related mortality were 0.12 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.17; P < .0001) and 0.02 (95% CI, < 0.01 to 0.05; P = .0269) following TBI and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.40) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.14) following chemoconditioning, respectively. CONCLUSION Improved OS and lower relapse risk were observed following TBI plus etoposide compared with chemoconditioning. We therefore recommend TBI plus etoposide for patients > 4 years old with high-risk ALL undergoing allogeneic HSCT.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3520-3520
Author(s):  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
Mohamad Sobh ◽  
Stephane Morisset ◽  
Mohamad Mohty ◽  
Gerard Socie ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3520 Background: CLL remains incurable with standard therapies. Myeloablative allogeneic SCT (allo-HSCT) is still associated with high TRM and few late relapses. Recently, the major focus of transplantation in CLL has been with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HSCT, which is applicable to the more elderly patient population and which attempts to exploit the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect that was proved in CLL Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity a RIC regimen including fludarabine and total body irradiation (TBI) with the introduction of rituximab for allo-HSCT in patients with a CLL stage B or C diagnosis. Materials and methods: This prospective study included adult CLL patients with age < 65 years in stage B or C in response after a salvage treatment either following at least 2 treatment lines (1 including fludarabine) or after a progressive disease after auto-HSCT, having a HLA identical sibling donor and a good performance status (Karnfosky >70%). Donors were mobilized by G-CSF and in case of collection failure, bone marrow aspiration was authorized. The conditioning included: rituximab 375mg/m2 on day -5, fludarabine 30 mg/m2 from day-4 to day-2, TBI 2grays (6-7 cGrays/minute) on day 0 and rituximab 500mg/m2 on day1 and day8. GVHD prophylaxis used cyclosporine A (IV 3mg/kg/day) from day-2 and mycomofetil fenolate oral (2g/day) from day 1. Results: Between April 2003 and December 2008, 40 patients were included, 34 (85%) males and 6 females with a median age of 54 years (35-65), 38 (95%) were in B stage at diagnosis and 2 in stage C. Among 23 explored for cytogenetics, 8 were abnormal (3 del17, 1 trisomy12, 1 t(8-11) & 1 del13). Before transplantation, 17 patients received 2 lines treatment, 10 three lines, 5 four lines, and 8>4. Only 1 patient received a previous auto-HSCT. Among 18 explored for Matutes status, 1 was in score 1, 1 in score 2, 3 in score 3, 5 in score 4 & 9 in score 5. At time of allograft, 7 (17%) patients were in complete response (CR), 29 (73%) in partial response (PR) and 4 (10%) < PR. For sex-matching, 59% were mismatched (27%of them were F>M). For ABO matching, 68% were compatible, 19% major incomp. & 13% minor incopm. The median interval diagnosis-allo-HSCT was 58 months (6-177). Median CD34+ number was 7.64 (3.1-18.7). Seven (17%) patients did not receive rituximab during conditioning because the protocol did not include it at the beginning and has been amended later. Thirty-nine (98%) patients engrafted with a median time to neutrophils recovery of 20 days (11-70), 79% of patients reached a total donor chimerism at day 90. Seventeen patients developed aGVHD grade ≥II (8 grII, 8 grIII & 1 grIV) with a cumulative incidence at 3 months of 44% (36-52). The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was, at 12 months: 29% (21-36) for limited and extensive; at 18 months: 32% (24-40) limited and 42% (34-50) extensive. After a median follow-up of 28 months (3-71), the median OS was not reached with 3 and 5-years probability of 55%(41-74). The median time of EFS was 30 months (15 - 70) with a 5-years probability of 46%(33-66). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 and 3 years was 17% (11-23) and 22% (15-29) respectively. The cumulative incidence TRM at 1 and 3 years was 10% (5-15) and 27% (20-35) respectively. At the last follow-up, 17 patients died, 6 due to relapse and 11 due to TRM. We noticed a high severe infection rate (56%) and 4% of deaths related only to infection. The univariate analysis showed a positive trend of rituximab on OS and relapse, and a significant protective effect on aGVHD>=2 (p=0.02). The multivariate analysis studying age, interval diagnosis-allo-HSCT, ABO and sex matching, disease status at allo-HSCT, CD34+ number, and rituximab, showed a positive significant impact of this last factor (rituximab) on OS and EFS [HR=0.1 [0-0.6] p=0.02 & HR=0.1[0-0.4] p=0.035 respectively]. Conclusion: We showed interesting results in terms of OS, relapse and TRM in patients with advanced CLL after Fludarabine/TBI allo-HSCT. The introduction of rituximab allowed a better outcome especially a significant reduction of incidence and severity of acute GVHD. Nevertheless there was still a high incidence of cGVHD, already known following the Fludarabine/TBI conditioning, leading us to propose either to increase the number of rituximab injections after allo-HSCT, or to test Fludarabine/busilvex/ATG associated to rituximab. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (25) ◽  
pp. 6155-6161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Veys ◽  
Robert F. Wynn ◽  
Kwang Woo Ahn ◽  
Sujith Samarasinghe ◽  
Wensheng He ◽  
...  

AbstractTo determine whether in vivo T-cell depletion, which lowers GVHD, abrogates the antileukemic benefits of myeloablative total body irradiation–based conditioning and unrelated donor transplantation, in the present study, we analyzed 715 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Patients were grouped for analysis according to whether conditioning included antithymocyte globulin (ATG; n = 191) or alemtuzumab (n = 132) and no in vivo T-cell depletion (n = 392). The median follow-up time was 3.5 years for the ATG group and 5 years for the alemtuzumab and T cell–replete groups. Using Cox regression analysis, we compared transplantation outcomes between groups. Compared with no T-cell depletion, grade 2-4 acute and chronic GVHD rates were significantly lower after in vivo T-cell depletion with ATG (relative risk [RR] = 0.66; P = .005 and RR = 0.55; P < .0001, respectively) or alemtuzumab (RR = 0.09; P < .003 and RR = 0.21; P < .0001, respectively). Despite lower GVHD rates after in vivo T-cell depletion, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, overall survival, and leukemia-free survival (LFS) did not differ significantly among the treatment groups. The 3-year probabilities of LFS after ATG-containing, alemtuzumab-containing, and T cell–replete transplantations were 43%, 49%, and 46%, respectively. These data suggest that in vivo T-cell depletion lowers GVHD without compromising LFS among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who are undergoing unrelated donor transplantation with myeloablative total body irradiation–based regimens.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2157-2157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged I. Gharib ◽  
Hayley M. Greenfield ◽  
Robert F. Wynn ◽  
Paul Veys ◽  
Paru Naik ◽  
...  

Abstract Bristol has previously published extensively on the use of Campath antibodies during the unrelated donor cell transplantation of children with relapsed or otherwise high risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (A.L.L.). These former reports (Br J Haematol1996;94(3):574–8; Blood1999; 94(7) 2236–46) concerned the use of Campath IG (a rat monoclonal antibody directed at CD52) given pre-transplant to the patients by intravenous infusion during conditioning therapy that also included cyclophosphamide (120 mgs/kg) and fractionated total body irradiation (1440 Gy). During this treatment the unrelated donor marrow was T cell depleted in vitro using Campath IM (also monoclonal and of rat origin). The results of such treatment demonstrated results comparable with HLA-matched sibling BMT, with low levels of acute graft versus host disease. In this communication transplant centres in 3 UK hospitals (Bristol, Great Ormond Street, London and Manchester) report their combined experience of using Campath IH (Alemtuzumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody - also directed at CD52) in the conditioning therapy of children with relapsed or otherwise high risk A.L.L.. The conditioning was otherwise again with Cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation. In this protocol a T cell replete graft was given and there was no in vitro T cell depletion of the unrelated donor marrow. We report 34 successive patients where follow up for at least 12 months was available. The median age was 6.5 years and 28 patients received fully matched grafts (matched at HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and DQB1). The remaining patients received a graft that was mismatched at one of these class I loci. All patients engrafted and the median time to neutrophil count sustained above 0.5x10e9 / l was 20 days (range 12–58 days). Only tow patients experienced grade III acute GvHD and no patient experienced grade IV acute GvHD. 22 patients survive at a median follow up of 23.8 months including 4 of the patients who received a mismatched graft. There were only 3 deaths in the first 100 days following transplant (2 due to disseminated, invasive adenovirus and one to aspergillus). Beyond 100 days 3 further patients have died of adenovirus, 3 have relapsed, 2 have died of chronic GvHD and one died of a pulmonary haemorrhage of uncertain aetiology. We therefore conclude the combination of Aletuzumab with cyclophosphamide and TBI is an effective and safe conditioning therapy for children with relapsed A.L.L. All patients engraft and there are low rates of acute and chronic GvHD.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 11-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara De Moerloose ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Yves Bertrand ◽  
Francoise Mazingue ◽  
Alain Robert ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: An overview of trials dating back to the ‘70s and ‘80s has shown that addition of vincristine (VCR)+prednisone/prednisolone pulses to continuation therapy of childhood ALL, i.e. 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) + methotrexate (MTX), improved disease-free survival (DFS) (Lancet, 1996). However, a recent randomized intergroup trial (IGT) has shown that, when given to intermediate risk (age&lt;1 or &gt;=6 yrs or WBC&gt;20×109/L) patients (pts) treated according to the BFM protocol, VCR+dexamethasone (DEX) pulses in continuation therapy failed to improve DFS and overall survival (Lancet, 2007). Methods: In 12/1998, EORTC CLG started the randomized phase III 58951 trial addressing 3 questions: R1) the value of DEX vs PRED in induction; R2) the value of prolonged (24 injections) vs conventional (12 injections) duration of L-asparaginase (ASPA) courses during consolidation and late intensification; R3) for average risk (AR) pts only: the value of 6 (VCR+corticosteroid) pulses every 10 weeks during continuation therapy. The corticoid of the pulses was that assigned to the patient at R1: DEX (6 mg/sm/d) or prednisolone (PRED) (60 mg/sm/d) during 7 days. AR pts were defined by being neither low risk (hyperploidy &gt; 50 or DNI&gt;1.16, and WBC&lt;10×109/L and no extramedullary involvement) nor very high risk (Leukemia 2000). A total of 81 pts from the EORTC 58951 trial were included in the IGT study. Randomization was done centrally, and the main endpoint was DFS; secondary endpoints were OS and toxicity. Intent-to-treat analysis was used. Results: Between 6.1999 and 11.2004, 411 pts, ALL (N=384) and NHL (N=27), were randomized for the pulse question. In the Pulses group, 101 vs 101 pts were randomized for PRED vs DEX. At a median follow-up of 6.3 years, there were 19 vs 34 DFS events for the Pulses vs No Pulses comparison: BM (10 vs 16), CNS only (1 vs 4), other isolated (2 vs 3), BM+CNS (2 vs 5), BM+other (4 vs 4), death in CR (0 vs 2). The 6-year DFS rate from randomization was 90.6% (SE 2.1%) in the Pulses group and 82.8% (SE 2.8%) in the No Pulses group (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.54, 95% CI 0.32–0.94, 2-sided logrank p=0.027). The impact of pulses on DFS was similar in the PRED group (HR=0.56) and the DEX group (HR=0.59). In girls the treatment difference seemed to be more pronounced (HR=0.25, 99% CI 0.04–1.25; p=0.015) than in boys (HR=0.71, 99% CI 0.30–1.66; p=0.30), and also in those having been randomized to receive conventional duration of ASPA courses (HR=0.46, 99% CI 0.18–1.19; p=0.03) than in prolonged ASPA arm (HR=0.87, 99% CI 0.23–3.29; p=0.78). Grade 3–4 hepatic toxicity was lower in the Pulses group (30% vs 40%); incidence of grade 2–3 osteonecrosis was 4.4% (Pulses) vs 2% (No Pulses) and pancreatitis rate was 4.9% (Pulses) vs 2.9% (No Pulses). Conclusion: VCR+corticosteroid pulses, at long follow-up (median=6.3 yrs), significantly improved the DFS, particularly in pts having received conventional duration of ASPA. Pulses did not increase toxic effects. In future, for AR pts treated according to the BFM protocol, pulses should become a standard component of therapy.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3102-3102
Author(s):  
Partow Kebriaei ◽  
Kaci Wilhelm ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Rima M. Saliba ◽  
Marcos De Lima ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3102 No highly effective salvage therapy exists for patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO) is a CD22 monoclonal antibody attached to calicheamycin and targets B lymphocytes in early stages of development. A 56% overall response rate was noted in a Phase I study of single agent IO in patients with refractory ALL (Jabbour ASCO 2011), enabling subsequent transplant in remission in a relatively large number of patients. Of note, in the year prior to the availability of IO, we consulted on 13 patients will ALL beyond second remission and transplanted 5 (38%), and after the availability of IO, we consulted on 41 patients and transplanted 27 (67%). Methods: We describe our findings in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following treatment with IO between June 2010 and May 2011. IO was administered at 1.8 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks. Results: 19 patients with median age 32 years (range 5–60) received an allogeneic matched sibling (n=6), matched unrelated donor (n=8), mismatched unrelated donor (n=4), or cord blood HSCT (n=1) in complete remission (CR) (n=2), CR without platelet recovery (n=14), and active disease (n=3); 10 patients were MRD negative at time of HSCT as determined by multiparameter flow cytometry. Patients had received 2 (n=3), 3 (n=9), 4 (n=4), 5 (n=2), or 6 (n=1) lines of salvage therapy prior to HSCT, including 3 patients who had received a prior allogeneic HSCT; IO was the last agent in 17 patients (2 patients refractory to IO received other therapy prior to HSCT). Patients received 1 (n=1), 2 (n=9), 3 (n=6), 4 (n=2), or 5 (n=1) courses of IO a median of 35 days (range 18–69) prior to transplant conditioning with busulfan (Bu) and colafarabine (Clo) (n=8), BuClo+ thiotepa (TT) (n=4), fludarabine (Flu) and melphalan (Mel) (n=1), FluMelTT (n=3), or etoposide and total body irradiation (TBI) (n=3); GVHD prophylaxis was tacrolimus-based for all patients, with post-HSCT cyclophosphamide added for patients receiving mismatched unrelated donors. With a median follow-up of 3 months among surviving patients (0.6–8.2), overall and progression-free survival is 59% at 3 months. There were 11 deaths, 6 from relapse, 4 from multi-organ failure involving VOD, and 1 from pneumonia. Transient liver enzyme elevations were noted in all of the patients, with 26% (n=5) patients developing VOD. The development of VOD was associated with greater lines of prior therapy prior to HSCT (3–5 lines prior salvage therapy, including 2 patients who had a prior allo-HSCT) and more intense transplant conditioning regimens (4 of the 5 patients received BuCloTT or FluMelTT). Conclusions: IO is an effective salvage therapy in patients with advanced ALL, allowing more patients to receive HSCT with encouraging response rates. Longer follow-up is needed to more completely assess disease control. Using reduced intensity HSCT conditioning regimens and avoiding multiple lines of prior therapies may result in less hepatic toxicity. Disclosures: O'Brien: Pfizer: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Pfizer: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1986-1986
Author(s):  
Jiong Hu ◽  
han-Bo Dou ◽  
Ling Wang ◽  
Wei Tang

Abstract Abstract 1986 For adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from HLA-matched related donor (MSD) is recommended for standard and high-risk patients. The role of unrelated donor transplantation (URD) is not fully determined. In this single-center retrospective analysis, we included all consecutive adult patients with high-risk ALL in 1st complete remission (CR) without sibling donor between Jan 2007 to June 2012. Overall, 74 patients were included in the analysis in which 32 patients received URD allo-HSCT during 1st CR with busulfan-cyclophophamide preparation regimen and in vivo T cell depletion with anti-T-lymphoglobulin (ATG). The median time from remission to transplantation was 4.5 months (3∼13). Forty-two patients in the chemotherapy group with 1st CR more than 6 months received consolidation chemotherapy alone either due to lack of suitable URD (n=21), refuse to URD search (n=14), unwillingness to undergo transplantation with available URD (n=5) and donor refuse to donate (n=2). Salvage allo-HSCT was allowed after relapse and actually 5 patients in the chemotherapy group received transplantation from URD donor (n=2) or haplo-identical donor (n=2) in the subsequent remission. The clinical characteristics such age, sex, initial WBC, and Philadelphia chromosome are all distributed equally in the two groups. With a median follow-up of 18 months for the whole group, 30 patients relapsed with estimated 3-year relapse rate (RR) at 58.1±8.5%. The 3-year event-free survival (LFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) were 38.0±7.9%, 11.1±4.4% and 46.0±9.0% respectively. In the URD allo-HSCT group, RR was 30.6±11.4% which was significantly lower than chemotherapy group (80.5±10.1%, p<0.001) while NRM was higher (16.4±6.7% vs. 0, p=0.028). Overall, 3-year LFS was superior in URD allo-HSCT group compared to chemotherapy (57.8±10.6% vs. 19.5±10.5%; median not reached vs. 13 months, p=0.002) and 3-year OS was also improved in URD allo-HSCT group (63.5±13.3%, median not reached versus 31.6±10.6%, median 24 months, p=0.016). Based on our data, URD allo-HSCT significantly reduced the relapse rate in high-risk ALL and the benefit translated into improvement in both LFS and OS. Prospective randomized study based on availability of HLA matched URD is warranted to confirm the exact role of URD transplantation in adult ALL. Table 1. Patient's characteristics Chemotherapy URD-allo-HSCT P value No of patients N=42 N=32 Median Follow-up (months) 15 (7.7∼48) 22 (8.2∼49) Sex (M/F) 19/23 21/11 0.08 Age 24.5 (16∼60) 25 (16∼57) 0.10     >35 14 9 0.61     <=35 28 23 Initial WBC (×109/L) 80.3 (15.3∼97.9) 61.5 (3.2∼98.4) 0.12 Cytogenetics     Ph+ 8 10 0.33     Ph− 33 22 Table 2. Clinical outcome in different treatment strategies Chemotherapy URD-allo-HSCT P value No of patients N=42 N=32 OS 31.6 ± 10.6% 63.5 ± 13.3% 0.016     median 24.9 months not reached LFS 19.5 ± 10.5% 57.8 ± 10.6% 0.002     median 13.2 months not reached Relapse rate 80.5 ± 10.1% 30.6 ± 11.4% <0.001 NRM 0% 16.4 ± 6.7% 0.028 Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Author(s):  
Anita W Rijneveld ◽  
Bronno van der Holt ◽  
Okke de Weerdt ◽  
Bart J Biemond ◽  
Arjan A Van de Loosdrecht ◽  
...  

Clofarabine (CLO) is a nucleoside analogue with efficacy in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This randomized phase III study aimed to evaluate whether CLO added to induction and consolidation would improve outcome in adults with newly diagnosed ALL. Treatment for younger (18-40 years) patients consisted of a pediatric inspired protocol and for older patients (41-70 years) of a semi-intensive protocol was used. 340 patients were randomized. After a median follow up of 70 months, 5-year EFS was 50% and 53% for arm A and B (CLO arm). For patients ≤40 years, EFS was 58% vs 65% in arm A vs B, while in patients &gt;40 years EFS was 43% in both arms. CR rate was 89% in both arms and similar in younger and older patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in 200 patients (60%). Fifty-four of 76 evaluable patients (71%) were MRD negative after consolidation 1 in arm A vs 75/81 (93%) in arm B (p=0.001). Seventy (42%) patients proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in both arms. Five years OS was similar in both arms, 60% vs 61%. Among patients achieving CR, relapse rates were 28% and 24%, and non-relapse mortality was 16% vs 17% after CR. CLO treated patients experienced more serious adverse events, more infections, and more often went off-protocol. This was most pronounced in older patients. We conclude that, despite a higher rate of MRD-negativity, addition of CLO does not improve outcome in adults with ALL, which might be due to increased toxicity. The trial is registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR2004.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document