Combination Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Gemcitabine Is an Active Treatment for Advanced Urothelial Cancer

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 2527-2533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha Hussain ◽  
Ulka Vaishampayan ◽  
Wei Du ◽  
Bruce Redman ◽  
David C. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Target Area ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Visceral Metastases ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of the drug combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients eligible included those with advanced urothelial malignancy of any histology, no previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease, Southwest Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, serum creatinine levels of 2 mg/dL or less, and adequate bone marrow and hepatic function. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2, carboplatin (target area under the curve = 5) on day 1, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (44 men and five women) were enrolled; the patients’ median age was 63 years, and their median creatinine clearance was 78 mL/min (range, 26 to 165 mL/min). Forty-three patients had transitional cell carcinoma, and six had squamous cell carcinoma or mixed histology. Ten patients had metastases to lymph nodes only, six had locally advanced disease, four had locally recurrent disease, 24 patients had visceral metastases, and five had soft tissue metastases. Twenty-one patients had disease in one site, 16 in two sites, and 12 in three sites. A total of 272 cycles were administered (median, six cycles; range, 1 to 15 cycles). Major toxicities were grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 17 and 19 patients, respectively; grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 15 and six patients, respectively; grade 3 and 4 anemia in 10 and two patients, respectively; grade 3 neuropathy in four patients; and diarrhea in two patients. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 1.4%; no patients died of drug toxicity. Forty-seven of the 49 patients were assessable for response. Fifteen (32%) patients experienced a complete response, and 17 (36%) patients experienced a partial response (32 of 47 patients, 68%; 95% confidence interval, 56.27 to 82.86). Responses were seen in all sites, including 15 (68%) of 22 patients with visceral metastases. The median survival was 14.7 months, with a 1-year survival of 59%. CONCLUSION: Combination paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine is active; an encouraging number of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with this regimen experienced complete remission.

Safety of Vinflunine in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Refractory to Platinum-based Chemotherapy: A Prospective Pilot Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Raafat Abdel-Malek ◽  
Kyrillus S. Shohdy ◽  
Noha Abbas ◽  
Mohamed Ismail ◽  
Emad Hamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Several single chemotherapeutic agents have been evaluated as the second-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Despite encouraging efficacy outcomes, toxicity has often led to dose modifications or discontinuation. We aimed to assess the safety of vinflunine in a particular population of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of urothelium (TCCU), that were exposed to the previous toxicity of chemotherapy. Methods: This is an open-label, prospective, single-center pilot study to evaluate the response rate and safety profile of vinflunine in patients with advanced TCCU. It was planned to enroll 25 evaluable patients. Eligible patients are those with progressive disease after first-line platinum-based regimen for advanced or metastatic disease. Results: The study was prematurely closed due to two sudden deaths that were judged by the review board as treatment-related. Only ten patients were evaluated and received at least one cycle of vinflunine. All but one were male and seven underwent radical surgery. Eight had a distant metastasis (mainly lung and/or liver). Disease control rate was 40%, four patients had a partial response with median duration of response of 3.5 months. The median overall survival was 3.2 months (95% CI:1.67- 4.73). There were three serious adverse events namely two sudden deaths and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Nine grade 3/4 adverse events occurred. The most common all-grade adverse events were fatigue (50%), constipation (40%) and vomiting (40%). Moreover, grade 3 fatigue occurred in 30% of patients. Only one patient, who achieved PR for 5 months, was fit to receive further cytotoxic chemotherapy. Conclusion: The activity of vinflunine in advanced urothelial carcinoma came at the expense of its safety. The use of vinflunine has to be limited to the selected group of patients. However, this is a single institute experience in a limited number of patients.

Phase I-II Study of Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Gemcitabine in Advanced Transitional-Cell Carcinoma of the Urothelium

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (18) ◽  
pp. 3247-3255 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bellmunt ◽  
V. Guillem ◽  
L. Paz-Ares ◽  
J.L. González-Larriba ◽  
J. Carles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Transitional Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the antitumor activity of a combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic TCC and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2 and creatinine clearance ≥ 55 mL/min were eligible. Cisplatin was given on day 1 at a fixed dose of 70 mg/m2. Paclitaxel and gemcitabine were given on days 1 and 8 at increasing dose levels. Cycles were repeated every 21 days to a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were registered. In phase I, 15 patients were entered at four different dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of early onset (after the first cycle) grade 2 asthenia (two of six patients) and grade 3 asthenia (one of six patients) at dose level 4. A paclitaxel dose of 80 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was recommended for phase II, and 46 additional patients were entered at this level for a total of 49 patients. Main nonhematologic toxicity was grade 2 asthenia in 18 patients, with early onset in five patients, and grade 3 in four patients. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 27 (55%) and 11 (22%) patients, respectively. Overall, febrile neutropenia was seen in 11 patients, and one toxic death occurred because of neutropenic sepsis. The combination was active at all dose levels. In total, 58 of 61 eligible patients were assessable for response; 16 complete responses (27.6%) and 29 partial responses (50%) were observed for an overall response rate of 77.6% (95% confidence interval, 60% to 98%). The median survival time (MST) available for the phase I part of the study is 24.0 months. MST has not been reached for the whole group with the current follow-up. CONCLUSION: This combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine is feasible and highly active in patients with advanced TCC of the urothelium. Further evaluation of this regimen in patients with TCC is warranted.

Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin, an Active Regimen in Advanced Urothelial Cancer: A Phase II Trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 2876-2876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm J. Moore ◽  
Eric W. Winquist ◽  
Nevin Murray ◽  
Ian F. Tannock ◽  
Susan Huan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transitional Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine (2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) plus cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with measurable advanced transitional-cell carcinoma who had received no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were scheduled to receive gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 over 1 hour on day 2 of a 28-day cycle. Prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease was allowed if this was completed more than 1 year before study entry. RESULTS: There were six complete responses and 10 partial responses in 28 assessable patients, for anoverall response rate of 16 of 28 (57%). The response rate on an intent-to-treat basis was 16 of 31 patients (52%). The median survival is 13.2 months, with 18 patients still alive at this time. Toxicity was primarily hematologic, with 12 of 31 patients (39%) having ≥ grade 3 granulocytopenia and 17 of 31 (55%) having ≥ grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Two patients had febrile neutropenia. All patients required a dose modification of gemcitabine at some point in their therapy; the primary reason was thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is an active regimen for the treatment of urothelial cancer.

Updated efficacy and tolerability of durvalumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 286-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Peter H. O'Donnell ◽  
Christophe Massard ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Terence W. Friedlander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Visceral Metastases ◽  
Grade 3

286 Background: Anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy has shown promising clinical activity in urothelial carcinoma (UC). We report on a planned update of efficacy and follow-up in patients (pts) receiving durvalumab for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic UC. Methods: Pts received durvalumab 10 mg/kg Q2W up to 12 months (mo), unacceptable toxicity or confirmed progressive disease. Tumor PD-L1 expression was assessed using the validated Ventana SP263 assay (PD-L1 high = TC ≥ 25% or IC ≥ 25%). Primary endpoints were confirmed ORR by RECIST v1.1 with blinded independent central review (BICR) and safety. Duration of response (DoR) and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Results: As of July 24, 2016 (data cutoff [DCO]), the primary efficacy population included 103 pts who were followed for at least 13 weeks (median duration of follow up 7.3 mo); 37% had ≥ 2 prior regimens; 97% had prior platinum treatment; 95% had visceral metastases; and 49% had liver metastases at baseline. As of the DCO, 21 pts (20.4%) had a confirmed response per BICR (including 5 pts [4.9%] with a complete response) and an additional 3 pts had an unconfirmed response. Responses were seen in both PD-L1 high and PD-L1 low/negative subgroups (Table). Responses occurred early (median time to response 1.4 mo) and were durable. Median DoR has not been reached. Of the 21 confirmed responders, 18 pts had an ongoing response, 16 pts had DoR ≥ 6 mo and 7 pts had DoR ≥ 9 mo. Treatment-related Grade 3/4 AE rates were low (5.2%; as treated population, n = 191); Grade 3/4 immune-mediated AEs (imAEs) occurred in 3 pts, and 1 pt discontinued treatment due to an imAE of acute kidney injury. Conclusions: Durvalumab administered at 10 mg/kg Q2W showed clinical activity and an excellent safety profile in pts with locally advanced or metastatic UC. Clinical trial information: NCT01693562. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma: JAVELIN Bladder 100 Japanese subgroup analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiko Tomita ◽  
Yoshiaki Yamamoto ◽  
Norihiko Tsuchiya ◽  
Hiroomi Kanayama ◽  
Masatoshi Eto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supportive Care ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background The phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial showed significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) with avelumab as first-line (1L) maintenance therapy + best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) that had not progressed with 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy. Efficacy and safety were assessed in patients enrolled in Japan. Methods Patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC that had not progressed with 4–6 cycles of 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomized to avelumab (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) + BSC or BSC alone. The primary endpoint was OS, and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results In Japanese patients (n = 73) randomized to avelumab + BSC (n = 36) or BSC alone (n = 37), median OS was 24.7 months (95% CI, 18.2-not estimable) vs 18.7 months (95% CI, 12.8–33.0), respectively (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.41–1.58]), and median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 1.9–9.4) vs 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.9–3.8), respectively (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.36–1.11]). In the avelumab + BSC and BSC-alone arms, grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 50.0% vs 8.1%, including grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs in 13.9% vs 0%, respectively. Efficacy and safety results in Japanese patients were generally consistent with findings in the overall trial population. Conclusion Avelumab 1L maintenance treatment showed a favorable benefit-risk balance in Japanese patients, supporting avelumab 1L maintenance as a new standard of care in Japanese patients with advanced UC that has not progressed with 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02603432.

Significant activity of paclitaxel in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium: a phase II trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 2264-2270 ◽  
Author(s):  
B J Roth ◽  
R Dreicer ◽  
L H Einhorn ◽  
D Neuberg ◽  
D H Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transitional Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE To assess the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-six eligible patients were enrolled onto this cooperative group study and treated with paclitaxel at a dosage of 250 mg/m2 by 24-hour continuous infusion every 21 days until progression or patient intolerance. All patients received recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) at 5 micrograms/kg/d for at least 10 days during each cycle. RESULTS Eleven of 26 patients (42%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 23% to 63%) demonstrated an objective response, with seven achieving a complete clinical response (CR) (27%; 95% CI, 12% to 48%) and four (15%) a partial response (PR). The median duration of response in the 11 responders is 7+ months (range, 4 to 17), with five responders (four CRs, one PR) remaining progression-free at 5, 6, 10, 12, and 16 months from the start of therapy. The estimated median survival duration for all patients is 8.4 months. Hematologic toxicity consisted of anemia (12% grade 3) and granulocytopenia (4% grade 3, 19% grade 4), with two patients developing granulocytopenic fevers. Nonhematologic toxicity included grade 3 mucositis in 11%, grade 3 neuropathy in 11%, and grade 4 diarrhea in 4%. CONCLUSION Single-agent paclitaxel at this dosage and schedule is one of the most active single agents in previously untreated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, and is well tolerated by this patient population when given with hematopoetic growth factor support.

Gemcitabine: a promising new agent in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3441-3445 ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Moore ◽  
I F Tannock ◽  
D S Ernst ◽  
S Huan ◽  
N Murray
Keyword(s):  
Transitional Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Nonhematologic Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) in previously untreated patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-one patients with measurable advanced transitional cell carcinoma who had received no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were scheduled to receive gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease was allowed if this was completed greater than 1 year prior to study entry. All patients were treated on an outpatient basis. RESULTS There were three complete responses and six partial responses seen in 37 assessable patients, for an overall response rate of nine of 37 (24.3%; 95% confidence interval, 12 to 41). Four patients remain in remission at 14, 23, 24, and 31 months. The median survival was 8 months with 17% of patients alive at 2 years. Treatment generally was well-tolerated with three patients having > or = grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, five having grade 3 neutropenia, two having grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and two episodes of febrile neutropenia. Most patients were able to receive the drug as scheduled with the primary reason for dose reduction or dose delay being neutropenia. CONCLUSION Gemcitabine has promising single-agent activity against urothelial cancer with a favorable toxicity profile. Further studies in combination with other active agents are warranted.

281 JAVELIN Medley VEGF: phase 2 study of avelumab + axitinib in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or treatment naive, cisplatin-ineligible urothelial cancer (UC)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A307-A307
Author(s):  
Gabriella Galffy ◽  
Iwona Lugowska ◽  
Elena Poddubskaya ◽  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
Myung-Ju Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundAvelumab, a human anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, has shown a manageable safety profile and antitumor activity in multiple tumor types, including platinum-resistant metastatic or recurrent NSCLC,1 and is approved for patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who have progressed after ≥1 previous line of platinum-based chemotherapy2 3 and as maintenance treatment for those who have not progressed with platinum-based chemotherapy.4 JAVELIN Medley VEGF (NCT03472560) evaluated the efficacy and safety of avelumab + axitinib, a potent inhibitor of VEGFR 1, 2, and 3, in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC or UC.MethodsEligible patients with NSCLC had received ≥1 prior platinum-containing therapy and ≤2 prior lines of systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease; patients with UC were treatment naive in the locally advanced or metastatic setting and ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Patients were immune checkpoint inhibitor naïve and received avelumab 800 mg intravenously every 2 weeks + axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response (OR) per investigator assessment (RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. PD-L1 expression was assessed in baseline tumor samples (Ventana SP263 assay). Data have not undergone standard quality checks and are subject to change due to COVID-19–related healthcare burden.ResultsA total of 41 patients with NSCLC and 20 with UC received avelumab + axitinib. The confirmed OR rate was 31.7% (95% CI, 18.1–48.1) in the NSCLC cohort and 10% (95% CI, 1.2–31.7) in the UC cohort (all partial responses); 16 patients (39.0%) and 5 (25.0%) had stable disease, respectively. Responses were observed regardless of PD-L1 expression status. Median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 2.5–7.0) in the NSCLC cohort and 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.8–5.6) in the UC cohort. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 24 patients (58.5%) in the NSCLC cohort; the most common was hypertension (n=7 [17.1%]). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 9 patients (45.0%) in the UC cohort; the most common were amylase increased, asthenia, decreased appetite, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (n=2 [10%] each). One patient in each cohort experienced a TRAE that led to death (gastric perforation and urinary bladder hemorrhage).ConclusionsAvelumab + axitinib showed antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC or UC consistent with findings from studies of each drug alone and in combination.Trial RegistrationNCT03472560Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by each site’s independent ethics committee.ConsentN/AReferencesGulley JL, Rajan A, Spigel DR, et al. Avelumab for patients with previously treated metastatic or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): dose-expansion cohort of a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:599–610.Patel MR, Ellerton J, Infante JR, et al. Avelumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum failure (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): pooled results from two expansion cohorts of an open-label, phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:51–64.Bavencio(avelumab) injection. [package insert] Darmstadt, Germany: Merck KGaA; 2019.US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves avelumab for urothelial carcinoma maintenance treatment. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/fda-approves-avelumab-urothelial-carcinoma-maintenance-treatment. Accessed August 19, 2020.

scholarly journals Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Lei Zhou ◽  
Chang-Hua Yu ◽  
Wan-Wei Wang ◽  
Fu-Zhi Ji ◽  
Yao-Zu Xiong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275). Conclusion CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Microcystic Transitional Cell Carcinoma

2002 ◽  
Vol 126 (7) ◽  
pp. 859-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Leroy ◽  
Emmanuelle Leteurtre ◽  
Alexandre De La Taille ◽  
David Augusto ◽  
Jacques Biserte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transitional Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Pelvis ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Macroscopic Hematuria ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
First Case ◽  
History Of ◽  
Invasive Transitional Cell Carcinoma

Abstract Microcystic transitional cell carcinoma is a rare variant of urothelial carcinoma; to date, it has been described only in the urinary bladder. We report 2 cases of microcystic transitional cell carcinoma arising in the renal pelvis. The first case occurred in a 73-year-old man with a history of superficially invasive transitional cell carcinoma who presented with macroscopic hematuria and anemia. The second case occurred in a 62-year-old woman who had no relevant medical history and presented with hematuria. Computed tomographic scan revealed a tumor of the renal pelvis. In both cases, microscopic examination showed invasive transitional cell carcinoma with prominent cystic features. The cysts were irregular in size and were deeply infiltrative. The cysts were lined by single or multiple layers of cuboidal or flattened cells with minimal cytological atypia. The first patient died of his disease 18 months after presentation. The second patient remained well at her 6-month follow-up examination. Microcystic transitional cell carcinoma is an unusual, deceptively bland variant of urothelial carcinoma, which can mimic benign lesions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document