Phase III Study of Gemcitabine in Combination With Fluorouracil Versus Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 3270-3275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan D. Berlin ◽  
Paul Catalano ◽  
James P. Thomas ◽  
John W. Kugler ◽  
Daniel G. Haller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Carcinoma ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine is generally considered to constitute first-line therapy for pancreatic cancer. To determine whether the addition of fluorouracil (5-FU) improves on the results from single-agent gemcitabine, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) compared gemcitabine plus bolus 5-FU with gemcitabine alone for patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This trial involved patients with biopsy-proven, advanced carcinoma of the pancreas not amenable to surgical resection. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine alone (1,000 mg/m2/wk) weekly for 3 weeks of every 4 or to receive gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2/wk) followed by 5-FU (600 mg/m2/wk) weekly on the same schedule. The primary end point of the trial was survival, with secondary end points of time to progression and response rate. RESULTS: Of 327 patients enrolled over 18 months, 322 were eligible. Overall, the median survival was 5.4 months for gemcitabine alone and 6.7 months for gemcitabine plus 5-FU (P = .09). Progression-free survival for gemcitabine alone was 2.2 months, compared with 3.4 months for gemcitabine plus 5-FU (P = .022). Objective responses were uncommon and were observed in only 5.6% of patients treated with gemcitabine and 6.9% of patients treated with gemcitabine plus 5-FU. Most toxicities were hematologic or gastrointestinal; no significant differences were noted between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION: 5-FU, administered in conjunction with gemcitabine, did not improve the median survival of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma compared with single-agent gemcitabine. Further studies with other combinations of gemcitabine and 5-FU are not compelling, and clinical trial resources should address other combinations and novel agents.

Docetaxel Plus Gemcitabine or Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin in Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma: Randomized Phase II Study 40984 of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (36) ◽  
pp. 9250-9256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred P. Lutz ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Theo Wagener ◽  
Jean-Luc Van Laethem ◽  
Udo Vanhoefer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Pancreatic Carcinoma ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma ◽  
To Receive

Purpose To define the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel plus gemcitabine or docetaxel plus cisplatin for advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable disease and WHO performance status less than 2 were randomly assigned to receive 21-day cycles of gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 85 mg/m2 on day 8 (arm A) or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 (arm B). Primary end points were tumor response and rate of febrile neutropenia grade. Results Of 96 randomly assigned patients (49 patients in arm A and 47 patients in arm B), 70 patients were analyzed for response (36 in arm A and 34 in arm B) and 89 patients were analyzed for safety (45 in arm A and 44 in arm B). Confirmed responses were observed in 19.4% (95% CI, 8.2% to 36.0%) of patients in arm A and 23.5% (95% CI, 10.7% to 41.2%) in arm B. In arm A, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 4.7 months), median survival was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 11.0 months), and 1-year survival was 30%. In arm B, the median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 4.6 months), median survival was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.8 to 8.7 months), and 1-year survival was 16%. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 9% and 16% of patients in arms A and B, respectively. Conclusion Both regimens are well tolerated and show activity in advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The safety profile and survival analyses favor docetaxel plus gemcitabine for further evaluation.

scholarly journals Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Docetaxel With or Without Gefitinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1405-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanassios Argiris ◽  
Musie Ghebremichael ◽  
Jill Gilbert ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Kamakshi Sachidanandam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose We hypothesized that the addition of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to docetaxel would enhance therapeutic efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2, or patients with ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 but were previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive weekly docetaxel plus either placebo (arm A) or gefitinib 250 mg/d, orally (arm B) until disease progression. At the time of progression, patients in the placebo arm could receive single-agent gefitinib. EGFR, c-MET, and KRAS mutations and polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters were evaluated by pyrosequencing. Results Two hundred seventy patients were enrolled before the study was closed early at interim analysis (arm A, n = 136; arm B, n = 134). Median overall survival was 6.0 months in arm A versus 7.3 months in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.21; P = .60). An unplanned subset analysis showed that gefitinib improved survival in patients younger than 65 years (median 7.6 v 5.2 months; P = .04). Also, there was a trend for improved survival in patients with c-MET wild-type (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .09) regardless of treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities were comparable between the two arms except that grade 3/4 diarrhea was more common with docetaxel/gefitinib. Of 18 eligible patients who received gefitinib after disease progression in arm A, one patient had a partial response. Conclusion The addition of gefitinib to docetaxel was well tolerated but did not improve outcomes in poor prognosis but otherwise unselected patients with SCCHN.

A phase II study of picoplatin (pico) as second-line therapy for patients (pts) with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who have resistant or refractory disease or have relapsed within 180 days of completing first-line, platinum (plat)-containing chemotherapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7722-7722 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Bentzion ◽  
O. Lipatov ◽  
I. Polyakov ◽  
R. MacKintosh ◽  
J. Eckardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

7722 Background: Pico is a sterically hindered plat analogue designed to overcome plat resistance with improved safety and efficacy. In >600 pts pico had single-agent activity in lung, prostate, ovarian and other malignancies with rare significant nephro-, oto-, or neurotoxicity (∼2% grade 3 and 0% grade 4). In a previous phase 2 study of single agent pico as 2nd line therapy in SCLC, 4 of 48 pts (8%) had a partial response and 21 (44%) stable disease. Median survival was 27.0 (95% CI = 16–35) wks. This multi-center phase 2 trial was designed to confirm the activity of pico as 2nd line monotherapy for plat-resistant SCLC. Methods: Pts with SCLC who either 1) failed or progressed through 1st line plat-containing chemo (refractory disease), or 2) initially responded to 1st line plat-containing chemo and then relapsed/ progressed within 3 months (resistant disease), or 3) initially responded and then relapsed/progressed between 90 to 180 days (sensitive, relapsed 90 to 180 days), had measurable disease and ECOG PS 0–2 were treated with pico, 150 mg/m2 iv over1–2 hrs, q 21 days. Tumor response was assessed q 6 wks. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the NCI CTCAE. Results: 77 pts received pico (45 refractory, 27 resistant, 5 sensitive). The median number of cycles received was 2 (mean = 2.9). The most frequently reported AEs of any severity were thrombocytopenia (39% of pts), anemia (35%), neutropenia (22%), nausea (20%), emesis (14%) and dyspnea (25%). Neutropenic fever occurred in 1 pt; there were no treatment related deaths. One pt had grade 3 neuropathy; there was no grade 3 or 4 ototoxicity or nephrotoxicity. Median overall survival is 28.1 (95% CI = 26–37) wks. Median progression free survival is 9.3 (95% CI = 7–12) wks. Of 63 pts with at least 1 post-treatment assessment of disease status, 33 (52%) had stable disease. Conclusion: Median survival compares favorably with other therapeutic options and toxicity is reduced in pico treated SCLC pts who have failed prior plat-containing first-line chemo or who have progressed within 180 days of first-line chemo. A phase III trial to confirm these results has been initiated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of gemcitabine (Gem) + docetaxel (D) in combination with trastuzumab (T) in patients (pts) with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10730-10730
Author(s):  
D. R. Fescina ◽  
W. Gradishar ◽  
M. Orlando ◽  
J. Rubinsak ◽  
L. Haney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Ecog Ps

10730 Background: Addition of T to chemotherapy (chemo) is assoc. with improved overall survival (OS) in pts with HER2+ tumors. Combination chemo has shown improvements in PFS and OS over single agent in recent phase III studies. Pre-clinical models suggest that the combination of G and D appears to be synergistic and that either agent is also synergistic with T. Objectives: This multi-institutional study was designed to determine overall RR (primary endpoint), TTP, OS and the toxicity profile of the combination of G + D + T as first-line therapy for MBC pts. Design: Pts with measurable HER2-overexpressing (FISH+) MBC, no prior chemo in the metastatic setting, adequate end-organ function and PS 0–2, received Gem 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min on days 1 and 8 + D 75 mg/m2 day 1 and T on day 1 (8 mg/kg over 90 min on cycle 1, then 6 mg/kg over 30 min on subsequent cycles) of a 21-day cycle, until progressive disease or undue toxicity. Results: 8 pts have been enrolled over a period of 16 months. Median age: 53 years (range 40–74); ER status ±: 5/3 pts; ECOG PS 0 = 3 pts, 1 = 4 pts, 2 = 1 pt; Prior adjuvant therapy: Chemo ± Hormonal 3, Hormonal only 3, T 1. Sites of Disease: All pts had visceral involvement (Lung 4, Liver 5) and 5 pts ≥ 2 sites of metastatic disease. Total number of cycles administered was 52; median per pt. 7 (range 4–10). Median delivered dose intensity for G, D and T was 91%, 92% and 100% respectively. Toxicity was generally manageable. One pt discontinued therapy due to adverse events (grade 3 pneumonitis). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 27% and 10% of cycles; no grade 3/4 anemia or thrombocytopenia were recorded; Non-Heme toxicities of grade 2/3, included with dyspnea (0/2 pts), emesis (2/1), fatigue (4/1), diarrhea (1/1), dehydration (0/1), constipation (1/0). Complete alopecia was observed in 2 pts. No symptomatic cardiac toxicity was recorded. Best Overall RR assessment (N = 8): CR 3, PR 4, SD 1, PD 0, for an ORR of 7 out of 8 pts or 88% (95% CI: 47%–100%). Only 3 pts have progressed, and no pt has died. Progression-free survival at 1 year is 58%. Conclusion: According to this limited experience, the combination of G + D + T in front-line MBC is well tolerated and active. Study was discontinued due to slow accrual as of Feb 2004. Supported by Eli Lilly & Company. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase II Study of Ifosfamide+Doxorubicin in Patients With Advanced Synovial Sarcomas (E1793): A Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Sarcoma ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Edmonson ◽  
Louise M. Ryan ◽  
Carla I. Falkson ◽  
David G. Hicks ◽  
Ronald H. Blum
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Treatment Cycle ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Synovial Sarcomas ◽  
Subsequent Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Because we had observed in the synovial sarcoma subgroup of a broad phase III advanced soft tissue sarcoma study a significantly greater objective regression rate from ifosfamide+doxorubicin (88%) than from doxorubicin alone (20%) (P = 0.02), the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) decided to further assess this two drug combination in a subsequent Phase II study.Patients Between 1994 and 1999, twelve adult patients with advanced synovial sarcomas were enrolled to receive, as their initial chemotherapy, ifosfamide 7.5 gm/m2 plus doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, given intravenously over two consecutive days every 3 weeks.Methods Each day for 2 days doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 was infused over 5 min through a running i.v., followed by ifosfamide 3750 mg/m2 over 4 h. Continuous i.v. fluid was infused at 300 mL/h for 3 h on day 1, before chemotherapy was begun; then the infusion was continued at 100 mL/h for a total of 3 days. Mesna 750 mg/m2 was given 15 min before ifosfamide and at 4 and 8 h after ifosfamide on days 1 and 2 of each treatment cycle. Filgrastim (G-CSF) 5 μg/kg was given subcutaneously each day for 14 days beginning on day 3 of each treatment cycle to limit the severity of neutropenia.Results Five of our 12 patients (42%) experienced partial regression of their advanced synovial sarcomas; however, this first stage result was borderline for proceeding to the second planned stage of accrual and our case accrual was quite poor. Thus, the study was closed after stage one accrual. Our patients received a median of four cycles of chemotherapy (range: 1 to 6). All patients experienced at least grade 3 neutropenia (grade 4 in nine of them), and one patient died of treatment-related sepsis following the initial cycle of chemotherapy. Median survival was 11 months.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Immunotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubens Copia Sperandio ◽  
Roberto Carmagnani Pestana ◽  
Beatriz Viesser Miyamura ◽  
Ahmed O. Kaseb
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Annual Review ◽  
Publication Date ◽  
Liver Malignancy ◽  
First Line Therapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Single-agent anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrated promising efficacy in early-phase trials, a finding that was not confirmed in phase III studies. The combination of atezolizumab (an anti-PD-L1 ICI) with bevacizumab (an anti-VEGF antibody) was approved as first-line therapy in 2020, however, with significant improvement in response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in comparison with the previous standard of care, sorafenib. Numerous ongoing clinical trials are assessing ICIs in combination with each other or with targeted agents, and also in earlier stages with local therapies. This review summarizes the latest concepts in the use of ICIs for the management of HCC. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Medicine, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

A randomized phase II study of axitinib in combination with pemetrexed/cisplatin (pem/cis) as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7551-7551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandra Prakash Belani ◽  
Nobuyuki Yamamoto ◽  
Igor Bondarenko ◽  
Sergey V Orlov ◽  
Jie Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

7551 Background: Axitinib is a potent and selective second-generation inhibitor of VEGF receptors 1, 2, and 3 that has promising single-agent activity in advanced NSCLC. Efficacy and safety of axitinib (in 2 dosing schedules) combined with pem/ciswere evaluatedfor non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: Patients with confirmed stage IIIB, IV, or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC and ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1 were stratified by gender and PS, and randomized 1:1:1 to receive six 21-day cycles of axitinib continuously plus pem/cis (arm I); axitinib on Days 2 through 19 followed by a 3-day interruption plus pem/cis (arm II); or pem/cis alone (arm III). Axitinib was administered at a starting dose of 5 mg BID. Pem/cis (500/75 mg/m2) was infused on Day 1 of each cycle. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Baseline characteristics of patients in arm I (n=55), arm II (n=58), or arm III (n=57) ranged between 59–62 yr median age; 62–65% male; 71–85% White; 73–85% current/ex-smokers; and 43–47% PS 0. There were no significant differences in PFS or overall survival (OS) between axitinib-containing arms I and II compared with pem/cis alone, but objective response rates (ORR) were higher (Table). Most common all causality grade 3 adverse events (AEs) in arm I, II, and III, respectively, were hypertension (20%, 17%, 0%); neutropenia (18%, 10%, 9%); nausea (16%, 5%, 7%); vomiting (13%, 5%, 4%); fatigue (11%,16%,16%); and anemia (7%, 14%, 9%). Grade 4 AEs observed in >1 patient were asthenia and pulmonary embolism (2 patients each in arm II). Conclusions: Axitinib combined with pem/cis was generally well tolerated, but efficacy was not significantly better than pem/cis alone in non-squamous NSCLC. [Table: see text]

Phase III Study Comparing Three Cycles of Infusional Carmustine and Cisplatin Followed by Radiation Therapy With Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Carmustine in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial Glioblastoma Multiforme: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 2394

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1485-1491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart A. Grossman ◽  
Anne O’Neill ◽  
Margaret Grunnet ◽  
Minesh Mehta ◽  
James L. Pearlman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Ambulatory Treatment

Purpose: This phase III Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Southwest Oncology Group intergroup study was conducted to determine whether three 72-hour infusions of carmustine (BiCNU) and cisplatin administered monthly before external-beam radiotherapy would improve the survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. The control arm consisted of radiation with standard adjuvant BiCNU. Patients and Methods: A total of 223 patients were accrued from 1996 to 1999. Of these, 219 patients were eligible; 109 were randomly assigned to the experimental arm, and 110 were randomly assigned to the control arm. Randomization was stratified by age, performance status, and extent of resection. Results: The median age of the patients was 55 years; 55% were male, 93% were white, 26% had a biopsy only, and 84% were ambulatory. Treatment arms were well balanced with respect to baseline characteristics. Median follow-up time of the 15 patients still alive at the time of analysis was 3.3 years (range, 2 to 5 years). Median survival times for the standard and experimental arms were 11.2 and 11.0 months (P = .33, two-sided log-rank test), and survival at 1 year was 45% versus 44%, respectively. Fifty-six percent of patients received all three cycles of BiCNU/cisplatin, 12% received two cycles, and 31% received only one cycle. Toxicity was primarily hematologic and was more common in the experimental arm (P < .01). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that 72-hour infusions of BiCNU and cisplatin followed by radiation do not improve median survival, survival at 1 year, or time to progression. Furthermore, this treatment requires more time in the hospital and is associated with more serious toxicities than standard therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document